“The Students’ Intensity to Use 
English Dictionaries Related to Their 
Vocabulary Mastery” 
Lia Muliawati 
1210204049
BACKGROUNDS 
• Students’ limited vocabulary 
• The difficulties in determining part of 
speech 
• Spelling of word 
• Do not undestand the meaning and usage 
of word
Nation (2003) states the students who are 
learning vocabulary need to know at least 
2000 words in English to use a English 
Dictionaries provided in the packs 
containing course material because they 
find them difficult to understand.
The research question 
1) What is the students’ intensity to use 
English Dictionaries at EED of UIN 
Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung? 
2) What is the student’s vocabulary 
mastery at EED of UIN Sunan Gunung 
Djati Bandung? 
3) Is there any significant relation 
between the studentst’ intensity to use 
English Dictionaries and the students’ 
vocabulary mastery?
The Purpose of research 
1). To find out the students’ 
intensity to EnglishDictionaries. 
2). To find out the student’s 
vocabulary mastery. 
3). To find out a significant relation 
between the students’ intensity 
to use English Dictionaries and 
the students’t vocabulary 
mastery.
Indicators of students’ intensity 
to use English dictionaries related 
to their vocabulary development 
Intensity to use 
English Dictionaries: 
1. Ownership 
2. Frequent of use 
3. time of use 
4. Place of use 
Vocabulary Mastery 
1. Noun 
2. Verb 
3. Adjective 
4. Plural 
Relation
• H0 accepted if t count < t table : it means that 
there is no significant correlation between the 
students’ intensity to use English Dictionaries 
and their vocabulary mastery. 
• H1 accepted if t count > t table : it means that 
there is a significant corralation between the 
students’ intensity to use English Dictionaries 
and their vocabulary mastery.
Research Methodology 
Methodology 
(Sudjana) 
Research 
Setting 
Research 
subjects 
Type of data Technique of 
collecting data 
Descriptive 
method 
sixth semester 
students’of 
English 
Education 
Department. 
Population: 
135 students’ 
Quantitative 
data 
Questionnare 
Correlational 
study 
at State Islamic 
University of 
Sunan Gunung 
Djati Bandung 
Sample: taken 
10 percent to 
get sample 
(Sugiono).14 
students’. 
Random 
sample. 
Statistic Test
Data Analysis 
Validity Test 
Riduan, et,al (2009) 
Reliability Test 
Jihad, et,al (2009) 
Correlation PPM 
Formula 
Riduan, et,al (2009) 
Determinant 
Coefficient Formula 
Riduan, et,al (2009) 
Valid or not valid The question is 
relied measure 
Knowing relation 
between variable X 
and Y. 
to state significant 
or insignificant 
contribution 
variable X to Y
풓풙풚= 
n( xy)−( x).( y) 
(n x2− x 2).(n y2−( y)2) 
Validity test 
푟11 = 
푛 
푛−1 
1 − 
푆푖 
2 
푆푡 
2 푠2 = 
( 푋) 
푋2− 
2 
푛 
푛 
Realibility test 
KP = r2 x 100% t = 
푟 푛−2 
1−푟2 
Determinant 
Coefficient 
Formula 
Significance test 
푟푥푦 = 
N 푋푌 − 푋 푌 
푁. 푋2 − 푋 2 푁. 푌2 − 푌 2 
Corretalion PPM Formula
Testing Method : 
t count > t table , thus refused H0 it means that there 
is significant 
t count < t table, thus accepted H0 it means that 
there is no significant 
Riduan, et.al (2009)
Proposal Skripsi (SUPS) PBI

Proposal Skripsi (SUPS) PBI

  • 1.
    “The Students’ Intensityto Use English Dictionaries Related to Their Vocabulary Mastery” Lia Muliawati 1210204049
  • 2.
    BACKGROUNDS • Students’limited vocabulary • The difficulties in determining part of speech • Spelling of word • Do not undestand the meaning and usage of word
  • 3.
    Nation (2003) statesthe students who are learning vocabulary need to know at least 2000 words in English to use a English Dictionaries provided in the packs containing course material because they find them difficult to understand.
  • 4.
    The research question 1) What is the students’ intensity to use English Dictionaries at EED of UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung? 2) What is the student’s vocabulary mastery at EED of UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung? 3) Is there any significant relation between the studentst’ intensity to use English Dictionaries and the students’ vocabulary mastery?
  • 5.
    The Purpose ofresearch 1). To find out the students’ intensity to EnglishDictionaries. 2). To find out the student’s vocabulary mastery. 3). To find out a significant relation between the students’ intensity to use English Dictionaries and the students’t vocabulary mastery.
  • 6.
    Indicators of students’intensity to use English dictionaries related to their vocabulary development Intensity to use English Dictionaries: 1. Ownership 2. Frequent of use 3. time of use 4. Place of use Vocabulary Mastery 1. Noun 2. Verb 3. Adjective 4. Plural Relation
  • 7.
    • H0 acceptedif t count < t table : it means that there is no significant correlation between the students’ intensity to use English Dictionaries and their vocabulary mastery. • H1 accepted if t count > t table : it means that there is a significant corralation between the students’ intensity to use English Dictionaries and their vocabulary mastery.
  • 8.
    Research Methodology Methodology (Sudjana) Research Setting Research subjects Type of data Technique of collecting data Descriptive method sixth semester students’of English Education Department. Population: 135 students’ Quantitative data Questionnare Correlational study at State Islamic University of Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung Sample: taken 10 percent to get sample (Sugiono).14 students’. Random sample. Statistic Test
  • 9.
    Data Analysis ValidityTest Riduan, et,al (2009) Reliability Test Jihad, et,al (2009) Correlation PPM Formula Riduan, et,al (2009) Determinant Coefficient Formula Riduan, et,al (2009) Valid or not valid The question is relied measure Knowing relation between variable X and Y. to state significant or insignificant contribution variable X to Y
  • 10.
    풓풙풚= n( xy)−(x).( y) (n x2− x 2).(n y2−( y)2) Validity test 푟11 = 푛 푛−1 1 − 푆푖 2 푆푡 2 푠2 = ( 푋) 푋2− 2 푛 푛 Realibility test KP = r2 x 100% t = 푟 푛−2 1−푟2 Determinant Coefficient Formula Significance test 푟푥푦 = N 푋푌 − 푋 푌 푁. 푋2 − 푋 2 푁. 푌2 − 푌 2 Corretalion PPM Formula
  • 11.
    Testing Method : t count > t table , thus refused H0 it means that there is significant t count < t table, thus accepted H0 it means that there is no significant Riduan, et.al (2009)