SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 2
PRINT BASED MEDIA
                           Written Evaluation
When reflecting back on my Print Based Media project on producing a Digipak,
there are several things I can think of about what I liked, what I dislike and
what I would have done better if I decided to have the chance of doing this
again.

What I liked about my Digipak specifically was how I met the brief and my
audience’s inputs. I met the brief by sticking true to what had to be produced
and produce each element of the digipak so as the album cover/front cover,
the CD cover, the back cover and the inside covers. I tried my best to keep it
the same size of an actual digipak but I was having trouble on Adobe
Photoshop getting that to work correctly.

As for the audience’s feedback, I took that to heart and felt I put that on board
greatly without sacrificing too much of my initial ideas. I kept a lion decal,
pretty much the same title names and some similarities between the draft
cover and the final piece but the feedback I got seemed correct and a wise
decision to take on board.

The idea of having a lion represent the element of fire was something I really
enjoyed and I felt I got that on point in areas.

What I disliked about it was how samey everything looked. Due to a lack of
general creativity, I wasn’t sure how to convey each piece. I thought having the
back cover be the same but having the decal be filled in black was an
interesting effect and I felt that worked nicely but the inside covers and the CD
design itself, all shared the red and yellow sunburst effect. I should have done
something differently for each but I wanted to keep consistency. In my head, I
thought it would have worked out great, but I don’t think it did in the end.
Good on paper, bad execution.

Another thing I disliked about my digipak was the lack of information. To bring
a bit of life or flavour if you will to the digipak, I should have incorporated
some information on the band, some information on the track of the digipak. I
was missing a couple of essential features and other features that could have
enhanced the digipak quite a lot and made it have a good sense of
professionalism. Whilst I feel the design is quite nice and could be somewhat
professional, I don’t think the execution of it all was and that’s a shame.

If I was to do this again, I would incorporate a lot of things I have mentioned
before. I would make sure to include more essential details/features into the
digipak design as well as some other things that bring it to life some more. I
wouldn’t rely so much on what design (the sunburst effect) for each piece of
digipak because it can wear off a little and not be very pleasing to the eye, it
shows lack of creativity and overall design.

I think having the lion decal was a good idea but I probably wouldn’t rely so
much on that either as that was probably overused a little and next time, I
would probably research more into other designs and how those digipaks
become so enlightening and interesting.

More Related Content

What's hot

1.1 Initial Ideas _ Context.pptx
1.1 Initial Ideas _ Context.pptx1.1 Initial Ideas _ Context.pptx
1.1 Initial Ideas _ Context.pptxScottMandis
 
Unit78 production log
Unit78 production logUnit78 production log
Unit78 production logLuke Summers
 
Design by Brad Campbell
Design by Brad CampbellDesign by Brad Campbell
Design by Brad CampbellBrad Campbell
 
Making of the cover
Making of the coverMaking of the cover
Making of the coverjoshfoo
 
Portfolio - Jenner Porter
Portfolio - Jenner PorterPortfolio - Jenner Porter
Portfolio - Jenner PorterJenner Porter
 
3. fmp production experiments
3. fmp production experiments3. fmp production experiments
3. fmp production experimentsjay birkin
 
Preliminary task
Preliminary taskPreliminary task
Preliminary taskLaysan94
 
Rebekah Harris Portfolio Visual Media
Rebekah Harris Portfolio Visual MediaRebekah Harris Portfolio Visual Media
Rebekah Harris Portfolio Visual MediaRebekah Harris
 
Presentation - PRESENTING WORK
Presentation - PRESENTING WORKPresentation - PRESENTING WORK
Presentation - PRESENTING WORKcaleb wilcox
 
7. evaluation final version
7. evaluation final version7. evaluation final version
7. evaluation final versionTheaJennings1
 

What's hot (20)

7. evaluation done
7. evaluation   done7. evaluation   done
7. evaluation done
 
1.1 Initial Ideas _ Context.pptx
1.1 Initial Ideas _ Context.pptx1.1 Initial Ideas _ Context.pptx
1.1 Initial Ideas _ Context.pptx
 
Unit78 production log
Unit78 production logUnit78 production log
Unit78 production log
 
Part 2.5
Part 2.5Part 2.5
Part 2.5
 
Part 2.5
Part 2.5Part 2.5
Part 2.5
 
Design by Brad Campbell
Design by Brad CampbellDesign by Brad Campbell
Design by Brad Campbell
 
Making of the cover
Making of the coverMaking of the cover
Making of the cover
 
review
reviewreview
review
 
13A Michael Mann
13A Michael Mann13A Michael Mann
13A Michael Mann
 
7. evaluation(2)
7. evaluation(2)7. evaluation(2)
7. evaluation(2)
 
Portfolio - Jenner Porter
Portfolio - Jenner PorterPortfolio - Jenner Porter
Portfolio - Jenner Porter
 
3. fmp production experiments
3. fmp production experiments3. fmp production experiments
3. fmp production experiments
 
Preliminary task
Preliminary taskPreliminary task
Preliminary task
 
13 a carliejones
13 a carliejones13 a carliejones
13 a carliejones
 
13 a jerrodthomas
13 a jerrodthomas13 a jerrodthomas
13 a jerrodthomas
 
Rebekah Harris Portfolio Visual Media
Rebekah Harris Portfolio Visual MediaRebekah Harris Portfolio Visual Media
Rebekah Harris Portfolio Visual Media
 
Presentation - PRESENTING WORK
Presentation - PRESENTING WORKPresentation - PRESENTING WORK
Presentation - PRESENTING WORK
 
7. evaluation1
7. evaluation17. evaluation1
7. evaluation1
 
7. evaluation final version
7. evaluation final version7. evaluation final version
7. evaluation final version
 
Video game evaluation
Video game evaluationVideo game evaluation
Video game evaluation
 

Similar to Print based media written evaluation

7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluationjay birkin
 
7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluationchrislaw34
 
Add to photoshop editing
Add to photoshop editingAdd to photoshop editing
Add to photoshop editingjodieleighx
 
5. Evaluation.pptx
5. Evaluation.pptx5. Evaluation.pptx
5. Evaluation.pptxLukeAskew6
 
Digipak and Advert Feedback
Digipak and Advert FeedbackDigipak and Advert Feedback
Digipak and Advert Feedbackpaige_rowell
 
Digipak ideas - initial (album art)
Digipak ideas - initial (album art)Digipak ideas - initial (album art)
Digipak ideas - initial (album art)nathanbeardlcm1415
 
Feedback on digipak drafts
Feedback on digipak draftsFeedback on digipak drafts
Feedback on digipak draftsmollieafh
 
Initial plans final
Initial plans final Initial plans final
Initial plans final Tom Batty
 
Evaluation
EvaluationEvaluation
EvaluationReeceEcR
 
Factual layout evaluation
Factual layout evaluationFactual layout evaluation
Factual layout evaluationashboyne
 
Fmp evaluation
Fmp evaluationFmp evaluation
Fmp evaluationTom Batty
 

Similar to Print based media written evaluation (20)

7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation
 
7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation
 
Digipak plans
Digipak plansDigipak plans
Digipak plans
 
Add to photoshop editing
Add to photoshop editingAdd to photoshop editing
Add to photoshop editing
 
5. Evaluation.pptx
5. Evaluation.pptx5. Evaluation.pptx
5. Evaluation.pptx
 
Digipak and Advert Feedback
Digipak and Advert FeedbackDigipak and Advert Feedback
Digipak and Advert Feedback
 
Digipak ideas - initial (album art)
Digipak ideas - initial (album art)Digipak ideas - initial (album art)
Digipak ideas - initial (album art)
 
Feedback on digipak drafts
Feedback on digipak draftsFeedback on digipak drafts
Feedback on digipak drafts
 
Initial plans final
Initial plans final Initial plans final
Initial plans final
 
Evaluation
EvaluationEvaluation
Evaluation
 
Digipak Progress
Digipak Progress Digipak Progress
Digipak Progress
 
Image manip
Image manipImage manip
Image manip
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
 
Ideas, Sketches
Ideas, SketchesIdeas, Sketches
Ideas, Sketches
 
Question 7
Question 7Question 7
Question 7
 
Factual layout evaluation
Factual layout evaluationFactual layout evaluation
Factual layout evaluation
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
 
7. evaluation [comp]
7. evaluation [comp]7. evaluation [comp]
7. evaluation [comp]
 
7. evaluation [comp]
7. evaluation [comp]7. evaluation [comp]
7. evaluation [comp]
 
Fmp evaluation
Fmp evaluationFmp evaluation
Fmp evaluation
 

More from Ryan McDonnell

More from Ryan McDonnell (20)

Print based media production evaluation
Print based media production evaluationPrint based media production evaluation
Print based media production evaluation
 
Research presentation lo3
Research presentation   lo3Research presentation   lo3
Research presentation lo3
 
Research log lo2 log
Research log   lo2 logResearch log   lo2 log
Research log lo2 log
 
Research unit lo2 booklet
Research unit   lo2 bookletResearch unit   lo2 booklet
Research unit lo2 booklet
 
Research presentation lo3
Research presentation   lo3Research presentation   lo3
Research presentation lo3
 
Research unit lo2 booklet
Research unit   lo2 bookletResearch unit   lo2 booklet
Research unit lo2 booklet
 
Research log lo2 log
Research log   lo2 logResearch log   lo2 log
Research log lo2 log
 
Lo2.7 presentation
Lo2.7 presentationLo2.7 presentation
Lo2.7 presentation
 
Lo2.6 presentation
Lo2.6 presentationLo2.6 presentation
Lo2.6 presentation
 
Lo2.4 presentation
Lo2.4 presentationLo2.4 presentation
Lo2.4 presentation
 
Lo2.3 presentation
Lo2.3 presentationLo2.3 presentation
Lo2.3 presentation
 
Lo2.2 presentation
Lo2.2 presentationLo2.2 presentation
Lo2.2 presentation
 
Lo2.1 presentation
Lo2.1 presentationLo2.1 presentation
Lo2.1 presentation
 
Lo1.5 & 6 presentation
Lo1.5 & 6 presentationLo1.5 & 6 presentation
Lo1.5 & 6 presentation
 
Lo1.4 presentation
Lo1.4 presentationLo1.4 presentation
Lo1.4 presentation
 
Lo1.3 presentation
Lo1.3 presentationLo1.3 presentation
Lo1.3 presentation
 
Lo1.2 presentation
Lo1.2 presentationLo1.2 presentation
Lo1.2 presentation
 
Lo1.1 presentation
Lo1.1 presentationLo1.1 presentation
Lo1.1 presentation
 
Research unit booklet
Research unit bookletResearch unit booklet
Research unit booklet
 
Extended project log
Extended project logExtended project log
Extended project log
 

Print based media written evaluation

  • 1. PRINT BASED MEDIA Written Evaluation When reflecting back on my Print Based Media project on producing a Digipak, there are several things I can think of about what I liked, what I dislike and what I would have done better if I decided to have the chance of doing this again. What I liked about my Digipak specifically was how I met the brief and my audience’s inputs. I met the brief by sticking true to what had to be produced and produce each element of the digipak so as the album cover/front cover, the CD cover, the back cover and the inside covers. I tried my best to keep it the same size of an actual digipak but I was having trouble on Adobe Photoshop getting that to work correctly. As for the audience’s feedback, I took that to heart and felt I put that on board greatly without sacrificing too much of my initial ideas. I kept a lion decal, pretty much the same title names and some similarities between the draft cover and the final piece but the feedback I got seemed correct and a wise decision to take on board. The idea of having a lion represent the element of fire was something I really enjoyed and I felt I got that on point in areas. What I disliked about it was how samey everything looked. Due to a lack of general creativity, I wasn’t sure how to convey each piece. I thought having the back cover be the same but having the decal be filled in black was an interesting effect and I felt that worked nicely but the inside covers and the CD design itself, all shared the red and yellow sunburst effect. I should have done something differently for each but I wanted to keep consistency. In my head, I thought it would have worked out great, but I don’t think it did in the end. Good on paper, bad execution. Another thing I disliked about my digipak was the lack of information. To bring a bit of life or flavour if you will to the digipak, I should have incorporated some information on the band, some information on the track of the digipak. I
  • 2. was missing a couple of essential features and other features that could have enhanced the digipak quite a lot and made it have a good sense of professionalism. Whilst I feel the design is quite nice and could be somewhat professional, I don’t think the execution of it all was and that’s a shame. If I was to do this again, I would incorporate a lot of things I have mentioned before. I would make sure to include more essential details/features into the digipak design as well as some other things that bring it to life some more. I wouldn’t rely so much on what design (the sunburst effect) for each piece of digipak because it can wear off a little and not be very pleasing to the eye, it shows lack of creativity and overall design. I think having the lion decal was a good idea but I probably wouldn’t rely so much on that either as that was probably overused a little and next time, I would probably research more into other designs and how those digipaks become so enlightening and interesting.