SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Copyright © 2015
DIRECTIONAL DRILLING DD-1
IADC Drilling Manual
Evolution of directional drilling since 1900
Directional drilling is the science of controlling or correcting
a wellbore, along a predetermined trajectory, to one or more
underground targets or locations at given horizontal dis-
placements (HD) and true vertical depths (TVD) from the
point of origin. The central advantage of drilling directionally
is that significantly more of the production formation is ex-
posed to the well, compared to vertical wells (Figures DD-1
and DD-2).
These techniques have been integral parts of the oil and gas
industry since the 1920s. Operators must maintain well-
bore verticality, construct curves (inclination builds and/or
drops) and maintain tangents all in a specific direction. Ap-
plications include drilling to difficult-to-access locations and
at river crossings as well as drilling relief wells, sidetrack-
ing, drilling multiple wells from one surface location or main
wellbore (multilaterals) and drilling with wellbores having
inclinations up to and exceeding 90°. High-inclination wells
(80°+) are considered horizontal and have significantly aug-
mented production due to their increased reservoir expo-
sure as compared to their low-angle counterparts. Extend-
ed-reach (ER) wells push the horizontal limits of directional
drilling even further.
Directional drilling has found a respected place in oilfields
worldwide. Historically, engineers have used established
methods based on years of prior experience to advance
the science toward modern techniques. Directional drilling
techniques were designed to improve the mechanics of de-
viated wells so that multiple boreholes could be drilled from
one location and at various angles. These techniques allow
drilling to contact larger quantity of oil and gas reserves,
thereby minimizing associated drilling costs, as well as envi-
ronmental impact.
1900-1920s
Directional drilling has come a long way since its origins.
Through most of the 1800s, wells ostensibly went in only
one direction—straight down. It was in the 1920s that the
industry first became aware of wellbore deviation of appar-
ently vertical holes. Once these holes could be surveyed,
operators discovered that, having had no prior method for
measuring inclination or direction, they had unknowingly
drilled holes with up to 50° +/- of inclination. Deviation ten-
dencies caused by formation dips, faults, bedding planes,
etc., acting on the drill bit were causing the drift away from
vertical. The bending characteristics of the drillstring, cou-
pled with the amount of weight applied to the bit, were also
factors affecting the desired outcome. Ultimately, surveys
consisting of depth, inclination and direction would be used
to accurately calculate a well’s position.
The acid bottle technique, developed in the late 1800s in
South African diamond mines to survey boreholes, became
in the 1920s, the first method to be utilized solely for mea-
suring inclination. A glass bottle filled with acid was lowered
into the borehole where the acid would settle at an angle
in the bottle lying parallel to the angle of inclination. After
some time, the acid etched the glass, which allowed calcu-
Bent
Housing
Motors
Relief Well
Steel
Whipsticks
Hardwood
Wedges
Gyroscopic
technology
development
Gyro
MWD
Rotary
Steerable
Systems
Measurement
While Drilling
(MWD)
Multilateral
in Russia
Entirely
Vertical/blind
“Straight Holes”
Magnetic
Single Shot
Mud Motor
Surface
Readout
Gyro
1900 1910 1920
Acid bottle
Surveying
Totco Drift
tool
Magnetic
Steering tools
North
Seeking Gyro
Stabilized
Rotary BHAs
Jetting
method
Horizontal
Drilling
Viable
Adjustable
Gauge Stabs
Extended
Reach Record
41,667 ft*
Gyro
Steering
Tool
* Set by Exxon Neftegas Ltd on the Sahkalin Shelf during 2013
Figure DD-1: Evolution of directional drilling.
Copyright © 2015
IADC Drilling Manual
DD-2 DIRECTIONAL DRILLING
lation of the wellbore’s inclination at a given depth. In the
1920s, Totco developed the mechanical drift recorder, which
could only measure borehole inclination but was more accu-
rate than the acid bottle and other early techniques.
Unfortunately, neither of these methods shed light on the
direction of well drift. The drive for wellbore control tech-
niques and improved surveying methods was partly ac-
celerated by the possibility that wells were drifting across
lease lines. This led to court decrees that lease holders only
owned deposits found within the downward vertical projec-
tion of their lease lines. Few at the time possessed technol-
ogy enabling control of well drift. Among those leaseholders
who did, some could not resist the temptation to produce oil
from an unaware neighbor.
Another method, developed by George Maas, used an ac-
id-etch test tube in parallel with a compass needle that
would lock into cooling gelatin, to record both inclination
and direction. A vacuum flask was used to protect the gel-
atin from external heat in the borehole. This development
was first described around 1912, yet the heat-shield principle
is still used in modern survey instruments.
In 1926, Sun Oil enlisted Sperry Corporation to use gyro-
scopic-based technology to make survey instruments for
accurately measuring borehole inclination and direction.
The rotating gyroscopes provided accurate measurements
across three different axes and allowed drillers to accurately
determine a borehole’s azimuth and inclination.
The first magnetic single-shot and multi-shot instruments,
which measured both inclination and direction, were devel-
oped in 1929 by H. John Eastman. These instruments used
sensors employing magnetic compass needles and plumb
bobs. They also featured mechanical timers that triggered
a simple camera to record the survey on photographic film.
The science of controlled directional drilling did not come
about until the development of these magnetic single-shot
and multi-shot instruments.
There were three natural consequences of these accurate
surveying methods: intentionally deviating wells to precise
bottomhole locations; restricting vertical wells to at most a
few degrees in inclination; and limiting the resultant well-
bore drift. The first deliberately deviated wells were drilled
in the late 1920s. Hardwood wedges were used, pushing the
bit to one side of the hole and producing a deflection to di-
rect the wells from vertical toward an intended direction.
1930s
In 1930, a French inventor named René Moineau discovered
the principle of the progressive cavity pump which led to
the development of downhole positive displacement motors
(PDMs). PDMs would eventually become the most effective
and commonly used deviation tools in the industry.
Records from two wells drilled in Huntington Beach, Cali-
fornia, in 1930 are the first records from directionally con-
trolled boreholes drilled from an onshore location to oil/gas
deposits under the ocean (offshore). The steel whipstock
was the main deflection tool used from the 1930s until the
1950s. Early whipstocks were simply lowered into the bore-
hole, oriented with the whip face in the desired direction
and mechanically anchored at the bottom of the main well-
bore (Figure DD-3). When the wellbore drifted off course, a
whipstock was set and drilling operations would be divert-
ed along the whip face. No attempts were made to retrieve
these whipstocks and they were typically abandoned in
the well. Beginning in 1932, directional wells were regularly
drilled along the beachfront beneath the ocean. In 1933, the
Signal Hill field was developed in Long Beach, Calif.
The orientation of directional tools, including whipstocks,
was accomplished by using a visual surface reference and
maintaining the tool facing while it was lowered into the
hole. Another method entailed running in a survey instru-
ment so that it landed in a special mule-shoe key designed to
Figure DD-2: Key parameters in directional drilling.
Copyright © 2015
DIRECTIONAL DRILLING DD-3
IADC Drilling Manual
align it with the tool facing (Figure DD-4). This was record-
ed as a reference to the magnetic direction or high side of an
inclined wellbore and the deviation tool could then be turned
to the desired facing/direction.
In 1934, a blowout occurred in a field owned by Humble Oil
Company of Conroe, Texas. A gas kick from a high-pressure
zone ignited, and the entire rig was engulfed in flames. After
many months and attempts to bring the fire under control,
other nearby rigs had to be closed down and the entire field
was threatened. H. John Eastman, with his experience using
whipstocks and surveying instruments, used a mobile drill-
ing truck to drill a directional relief well close enough to the
blowout well, killing the blowout on the first attempt. The
oil industry subsequently accepted directional drilling as a
reliable technique (Figure DD-5).
1940s-1960s
It’s likely that basic stabilized rotary bottomhole assembly
(BHA) designs with drill collars for weight and stiffness, to-
gether with stabilizers precisely positioned for inclination
control while drilling, originated in the 1940s. Historically,
it had been possible to control the angle of directional wells
during rotary drilling by correct design of the assembly and
use of suitable drilling parameters. The three basic princi-
ples included holding inclination (locked/packed), building
inclination (fulcrum) and dropping inclination (pendulum).
Drill collars, when used without stabilization, tended to
buckle and cause unwanted deviation and poor hole quality.
Multiple stabilizers were positioned to increase the stiffness
or to promote the natural bending of the drill collars, thereby
pointing the drill bit or applying a side force to encourage the
wellbore in a specific trajectory.
Control of hole direction had traditionally been poor with
basic rotary assemblies. Roller-cone bits usually walked to
the right (clockwise), and directional control was previous-
ly limited to using well-stabilized assemblies to reduce this
tendency. The normal prior practice with non-steerable as-
semblies was to lead the well an estimated amount to the
left of the plan, thereby compensating for anticipated turns.
Magnetic instruments naturally needed to be seated in
a nonmagnetic environment if they were to run inside the
drillstring to accurately measure direction. In the 1940s,
nonmagnetic drill collars (NMDC) were placed in the lowest
possible position of the drillstring with a crow’s foot baffle
plate inserted below it. This allowed the drilling fluid to pass
through the drillstring and, at the same time, provide a con-
venient seat for the survey instrument.
Gyroscopic surveying, developed as early as 1929, was
continuously improved from the 1940s to the 1960s. Gy-
ros were also used to measure inclination, azimuth and the
Ready to Start
Drilling
Drilling Ahead
on Whipstock
In Closed Position
Pin
Sheared
Drilling Ahead
in New Hole
Whipstock
Locked for Setting
Muleshoe
stinger
Key
Muleshoe
stinger
Key
Figure DD-3: Wellbore deviation with whipstocks.
Figure DD-4: One method to orient directional tools was
running in a survey instrument to land in a special mule-
shoe key designed to align it with the tool facing.
Figure DD-5: Directional drilling is well accepted as a
reliable technique to drill relief wells to kill blowouts.
First recorded application was in 1934.
Copyright © 2015
IADC Drilling Manual
DD-4 DIRECTIONAL DRILLING
deviation tool orientation. While magnetic instruments are
dependent on the Earth’s natural lines of magnetic force, gy-
ros use a gyroscopic compass to maintain a fixed-reference
direction and to measure relative changes in direction at se-
lected depths with the aid of a timer. This surveying technol-
ogy enabled even more directional drilling applications, as it
could be used in magnetic environments, e.g., for accurately
sidetracking from inside the casing in a vertical hole where
magnetic toolfaces would otherwise be impossible to orient
or when drilling suffers from magnetic interference from
nearby wells.
The jetting technique was developed in the mid-1950s.
Rarely used in the 21st century, it is still a valid and inexpen-
sive deviation method for soft formations. A special jet bit
may be used, but it is also common practice to use a stan-
dard soft formation tri-cone bit with one very large nozzle
and two smaller ones. The idea is to point the big jet in the
desired direction. With the majority of flow passing through
the large-bore nozzle (big jet), the hole preferentially wash-
es in the direction of the large nozzle and forms a pocket.
Drilling can continue with the assembly following the direc-
tion of the pocket (Figure DD-6).
While jetting is not common today, it can be useful tight an-
ti-collision scenarios exist in surface holes. Other notable
points about jetting include:
• It is relatively inexpensive compared to conventional
deflection tools;
• It allows surveys to be taken closer to the bit than any
other deflection method;
• Jetting dogleg response can be inconsistent and difficult
to predict;
• Effectiveness is reduced as bit diameter and BHA
tubular diameter increase;
• Hole-opening runs are often required, as jetting is often
performed in 8 ½ in. and 12 ¼ in. holes.
The first downhole drilling motors or mud motors were de-
signed and manufactured by Dyna-Drill in 1958. The mo-
tor was based on the 1930 Moineau design for progressive
cavity pumps. The mud motor’s molded elastomeric insert,
which is bonded to the inside of a cylindrical steel case,
comprises the stator of the pump or motor unit. A helical
rotor with one or more lobes rotates eccentrically within the
stator (which contains one more lobe than the rotor). When
differential pressure (i.e., mud flow through this power sec-
tion) is applied across the assembly, the rotary power ex-
tracted from the rotor/stator assembly functions as a motor
driving the drill bit. Many power section configurations have
been developed, from those that generate high bit speeds
Figure DD-6: Jetting was developed in the mid-1950s. Rarely used today, it is still a valid and
inexpensive deviation method in soft formations. Courtesy Baker Hughes Inc.
Copyright © 2015
DIRECTIONAL DRILLING DD-5
IADC Drilling Manual
but are limited to relatively low torque, to those allowing for
slower-bit speeds but at a much higher-torque output (Fig-
ure DD-7).
Mud motors were first used for directional control of bore-
holes in the 1960s. A bent sub (a short component for con-
necting two longer collars) was positioned directly on top
of the mud motor (Figure DD-8). This directional drilling
assembly would normally be used whenever the wellbore
reached a depth that required deviating, normally to initi-
ate/drill a curve or correct the wellbore. With the drillstring
not rotating (rotary drive locked), drilling was accomplished
by the motor-driven drill bit. This bit still rotated as long as
there was mud flow and the ability to make new hole by slid-
ing the drillstring. This would in effect kick off the wellbore in
the direction of the bent-sub toolface. The BHA was usually
pulled back out of the hole to prevent twisting off (breaking)
the motor due to high stresses caused when trying to rotate
the bent-sub configuration. Basic rotary assemblies would
be run to continue controlling the well path until another
motor run was necessary.
Mud motors were sometimes used in vertical applications
where high bit speeds were desirable. They had the added
benefit of minimizing erosion and wear on the drillstring
and casing strings since the drillstring would not need to be
turned as fast due to the reduction of the surface revolutions
per minute (RPM). The majority of mud motors were used
in directional (deviated) wells. In these wells, one run with
the bent-sub configuration could accomplish the same goal
as multiple runs with other methods of steering the bit, but
with greater accuracy, thus reducing time and cost.
The rebel tool was introduced in the 1960s. It was one of
the first directional drilling tools to control the direction of
lateral wellbore trajectory while rotating and could be set up
on surface for a left or right tendency. Inconsistent reliability
of these tools led to their declined use in the industry.
1970s
Magnetic-steering tools were first used in 1969 but became
more common in the 1970s. The steering tool was also used
to measure drift, direction and toolface during semi-contin-
uous drilling and with downhole directional data available in
real time on surface. An instrument assembly containing a
magnetic survey package was sent downhole connected by
a wireline. It was seated in a mule-shoe orienting sub (also
called Universal Bottomhole Orienting sub or UBHO) that
was connected to the top of a mud motor, thereby aligning it
with the motor’s toolface. A coder converted data measure-
ments to electrical pulses and transmitted the measure-
ments to the surface through a shielded electric conduit to
digital or video displays. Measurements were thus available
immediately in real time at the surface for use in directional-
ly controlling the wellbore. Even though these early steering
tools provided the directional driller with valuable data in
real time, the tools would have to be pulled out of the drill-
Figure DD-7: Downhole drilling motors were introduced by Dyna-Drill in 1958. Courtesy Baker Hughes Inc.
Magnetic
single shot
Bent sub
Downhole
mud motor
Drill bit
Figure DD-8: By the 1970s, mud motors dominated
directional drilling. As above, they were used
with a bent-sub for directional kick off.

More Related Content

Similar to preview-dd.pdf

Offshore drilling and production equipment (1)
 Offshore drilling and production equipment (1) Offshore drilling and production equipment (1)
Offshore drilling and production equipment (1)
nhuvangiap
 
Chapter 1_INFRASTRUCTURE & DRILLING.pdf
Chapter 1_INFRASTRUCTURE & DRILLING.pdfChapter 1_INFRASTRUCTURE & DRILLING.pdf
Chapter 1_INFRASTRUCTURE & DRILLING.pdf
KaisBenAbdallah2
 
Drilling Equipments
Drilling EquipmentsDrilling Equipments
Drilling Equipments
HardikKarkar2
 
Horizontal drilling
Horizontal drillingHorizontal drilling
Horizontal drilling
Rishabh Gupta
 
Directional drilling
Directional drillingDirectional drilling
Directional drilling
Fayyaz ASNT NDT LEVEL III
 
Machineries and Maintenance Question Patterns for Mining students
Machineries and Maintenance Question Patterns for Mining studentsMachineries and Maintenance Question Patterns for Mining students
Machineries and Maintenance Question Patterns for Mining students
Jessore University of Science & Technology
 
Shaft sinking 2
Shaft  sinking 2Shaft  sinking 2
Shaft sinking 2
Er.Sunil Wasade
 
Drilling enginnering 2-converted.pptx
Drilling enginnering 2-converted.pptxDrilling enginnering 2-converted.pptx
Drilling enginnering 2-converted.pptx
Younisbaloch3
 
Oil and Gas production: from exploration wells to the last stage of production.
Oil and Gas production: from exploration wells to the last stage of production.Oil and Gas production: from exploration wells to the last stage of production.
Oil and Gas production: from exploration wells to the last stage of production.
Eric HAGENIMANA
 
Drilling Engineering - Directional Drilling
Drilling Engineering - Directional DrillingDrilling Engineering - Directional Drilling
Drilling Engineering - Directional Drilling
James Craig
 
Trabajo de perforación
Trabajo de perforaciónTrabajo de perforación
Trabajo de perforación
DeyviMontaezCadillo
 
Mine Power & Drainage System
Mine Power & Drainage SystemMine Power & Drainage System
Mine Power & Drainage System
Ghulam Mehdi
 
Travis_Smith_Work_Term_Report_F2016
Travis_Smith_Work_Term_Report_F2016Travis_Smith_Work_Term_Report_F2016
Travis_Smith_Work_Term_Report_F2016
Travis Smith
 
Rig inspection, Sigve Hamilton Aspelund
Rig inspection, Sigve Hamilton AspelundRig inspection, Sigve Hamilton Aspelund
Rig inspection, Sigve Hamilton Aspelund
Sigve Hamilton Aspelund
 
Site investigation 2nd clayton etc
Site investigation 2nd clayton etcSite investigation 2nd clayton etc
Site investigation 2nd clayton etc
Fungky King
 
Surface mining planning and design of open pit mining
Surface mining planning and design of open pit miningSurface mining planning and design of open pit mining
Surface mining planning and design of open pit mining
Geology Department, Faculty of Science, Tanta University
 
Basics of drilling 1
Basics of drilling 1Basics of drilling 1
Basics of drilling 1
SATYANARAYANA I
 
New introduction to seismic method
New introduction to seismic method New introduction to seismic method
New introduction to seismic method
University of Azad Jammu & Kashmir
 
report for tunnelling by tunnel boring machine
report for tunnelling by tunnel boring machinereport for tunnelling by tunnel boring machine
report for tunnelling by tunnel boring machine
VISHAL KUMAR SINGH
 
Chapter 09
Chapter 09Chapter 09
Chapter 09
SantistebanCampos
 

Similar to preview-dd.pdf (20)

Offshore drilling and production equipment (1)
 Offshore drilling and production equipment (1) Offshore drilling and production equipment (1)
Offshore drilling and production equipment (1)
 
Chapter 1_INFRASTRUCTURE & DRILLING.pdf
Chapter 1_INFRASTRUCTURE & DRILLING.pdfChapter 1_INFRASTRUCTURE & DRILLING.pdf
Chapter 1_INFRASTRUCTURE & DRILLING.pdf
 
Drilling Equipments
Drilling EquipmentsDrilling Equipments
Drilling Equipments
 
Horizontal drilling
Horizontal drillingHorizontal drilling
Horizontal drilling
 
Directional drilling
Directional drillingDirectional drilling
Directional drilling
 
Machineries and Maintenance Question Patterns for Mining students
Machineries and Maintenance Question Patterns for Mining studentsMachineries and Maintenance Question Patterns for Mining students
Machineries and Maintenance Question Patterns for Mining students
 
Shaft sinking 2
Shaft  sinking 2Shaft  sinking 2
Shaft sinking 2
 
Drilling enginnering 2-converted.pptx
Drilling enginnering 2-converted.pptxDrilling enginnering 2-converted.pptx
Drilling enginnering 2-converted.pptx
 
Oil and Gas production: from exploration wells to the last stage of production.
Oil and Gas production: from exploration wells to the last stage of production.Oil and Gas production: from exploration wells to the last stage of production.
Oil and Gas production: from exploration wells to the last stage of production.
 
Drilling Engineering - Directional Drilling
Drilling Engineering - Directional DrillingDrilling Engineering - Directional Drilling
Drilling Engineering - Directional Drilling
 
Trabajo de perforación
Trabajo de perforaciónTrabajo de perforación
Trabajo de perforación
 
Mine Power & Drainage System
Mine Power & Drainage SystemMine Power & Drainage System
Mine Power & Drainage System
 
Travis_Smith_Work_Term_Report_F2016
Travis_Smith_Work_Term_Report_F2016Travis_Smith_Work_Term_Report_F2016
Travis_Smith_Work_Term_Report_F2016
 
Rig inspection, Sigve Hamilton Aspelund
Rig inspection, Sigve Hamilton AspelundRig inspection, Sigve Hamilton Aspelund
Rig inspection, Sigve Hamilton Aspelund
 
Site investigation 2nd clayton etc
Site investigation 2nd clayton etcSite investigation 2nd clayton etc
Site investigation 2nd clayton etc
 
Surface mining planning and design of open pit mining
Surface mining planning and design of open pit miningSurface mining planning and design of open pit mining
Surface mining planning and design of open pit mining
 
Basics of drilling 1
Basics of drilling 1Basics of drilling 1
Basics of drilling 1
 
New introduction to seismic method
New introduction to seismic method New introduction to seismic method
New introduction to seismic method
 
report for tunnelling by tunnel boring machine
report for tunnelling by tunnel boring machinereport for tunnelling by tunnel boring machine
report for tunnelling by tunnel boring machine
 
Chapter 09
Chapter 09Chapter 09
Chapter 09
 

More from Jalal Neshat

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Jalal Neshat
 
applied science engineering and mechanical properties
applied science engineering and mechanical propertiesapplied science engineering and mechanical properties
applied science engineering and mechanical properties
Jalal Neshat
 
mud volcano study and ggggggggggggggffffff
mud volcano study and ggggggggggggggffffffmud volcano study and ggggggggggggggffffff
mud volcano study and ggggggggggggggffffff
Jalal Neshat
 
fhsdfheahagggggggghjjdthkmdtkdtdujertyjerh1
fhsdfheahagggggggghjjdthkmdtkdtdujertyjerh1fhsdfheahagggggggghjjdthkmdtkdtdujertyjerh1
fhsdfheahagggggggghjjdthkmdtkdtdujertyjerh1
Jalal Neshat
 
CS004-Blowout-During-Fracture-Stimulation-Operations.pdf
CS004-Blowout-During-Fracture-Stimulation-Operations.pdfCS004-Blowout-During-Fracture-Stimulation-Operations.pdf
CS004-Blowout-During-Fracture-Stimulation-Operations.pdf
Jalal Neshat
 
Hydraulics Summary to optimization of drill bit hydraulics
Hydraulics Summary to optimization of drill bit hydraulicsHydraulics Summary to optimization of drill bit hydraulics
Hydraulics Summary to optimization of drill bit hydraulics
Jalal Neshat
 
DSSSSSSSSSSGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHLKKSSSSSSSSSGHHH
DSSSSSSSSSSGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHLKKSSSSSSSSSGHHHDSSSSSSSSSSGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHLKKSSSSSSSSSGHHH
DSSSSSSSSSSGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHLKKSSSSSSSSSGHHH
Jalal Neshat
 
274-Article Text-1503-1-10-20230609.pdf
274-Article Text-1503-1-10-20230609.pdf274-Article Text-1503-1-10-20230609.pdf
274-Article Text-1503-1-10-20230609.pdf
Jalal Neshat
 
CamScanner 09-30-2023 09.22.pdf
CamScanner 09-30-2023 09.22.pdfCamScanner 09-30-2023 09.22.pdf
CamScanner 09-30-2023 09.22.pdf
Jalal Neshat
 
fenrg-11-1120635-1.pdf
fenrg-11-1120635-1.pdffenrg-11-1120635-1.pdf
fenrg-11-1120635-1.pdf
Jalal Neshat
 
7285665.pdf
7285665.pdf7285665.pdf
7285665.pdf
Jalal Neshat
 
pdfcoffee.com_i-openwells-basics-training-3-pdf-free.pdf
pdfcoffee.com_i-openwells-basics-training-3-pdf-free.pdfpdfcoffee.com_i-openwells-basics-training-3-pdf-free.pdf
pdfcoffee.com_i-openwells-basics-training-3-pdf-free.pdf
Jalal Neshat
 
WildWell_TechDataBook-2018web.pdf
WildWell_TechDataBook-2018web.pdfWildWell_TechDataBook-2018web.pdf
WildWell_TechDataBook-2018web.pdf
Jalal Neshat
 
M-Hashemi 2281657930 CV.docx
M-Hashemi 2281657930 CV.docxM-Hashemi 2281657930 CV.docx
M-Hashemi 2281657930 CV.docx
Jalal Neshat
 
s00254-004-1088-y.pdf
s00254-004-1088-y.pdfs00254-004-1088-y.pdf
s00254-004-1088-y.pdf
Jalal Neshat
 
192282-MS.pdf
192282-MS.pdf192282-MS.pdf
192282-MS.pdf
Jalal Neshat
 
Rig Equipment
Rig EquipmentRig Equipment
Rig Equipment
Jalal Neshat
 
SPE171748 Surface Safety System for ZADCO (4).pdf
SPE171748 Surface Safety System for ZADCO (4).pdfSPE171748 Surface Safety System for ZADCO (4).pdf
SPE171748 Surface Safety System for ZADCO (4).pdf
Jalal Neshat
 
Mud_volcanoes_in_the_South_Caspian_basin_Nature_an.pdf
Mud_volcanoes_in_the_South_Caspian_basin_Nature_an.pdfMud_volcanoes_in_the_South_Caspian_basin_Nature_an.pdf
Mud_volcanoes_in_the_South_Caspian_basin_Nature_an.pdf
Jalal Neshat
 
Back-off Procedure.docx
Back-off Procedure.docxBack-off Procedure.docx
Back-off Procedure.docx
Jalal Neshat
 

More from Jalal Neshat (20)

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
 
applied science engineering and mechanical properties
applied science engineering and mechanical propertiesapplied science engineering and mechanical properties
applied science engineering and mechanical properties
 
mud volcano study and ggggggggggggggffffff
mud volcano study and ggggggggggggggffffffmud volcano study and ggggggggggggggffffff
mud volcano study and ggggggggggggggffffff
 
fhsdfheahagggggggghjjdthkmdtkdtdujertyjerh1
fhsdfheahagggggggghjjdthkmdtkdtdujertyjerh1fhsdfheahagggggggghjjdthkmdtkdtdujertyjerh1
fhsdfheahagggggggghjjdthkmdtkdtdujertyjerh1
 
CS004-Blowout-During-Fracture-Stimulation-Operations.pdf
CS004-Blowout-During-Fracture-Stimulation-Operations.pdfCS004-Blowout-During-Fracture-Stimulation-Operations.pdf
CS004-Blowout-During-Fracture-Stimulation-Operations.pdf
 
Hydraulics Summary to optimization of drill bit hydraulics
Hydraulics Summary to optimization of drill bit hydraulicsHydraulics Summary to optimization of drill bit hydraulics
Hydraulics Summary to optimization of drill bit hydraulics
 
DSSSSSSSSSSGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHLKKSSSSSSSSSGHHH
DSSSSSSSSSSGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHLKKSSSSSSSSSGHHHDSSSSSSSSSSGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHLKKSSSSSSSSSGHHH
DSSSSSSSSSSGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHLKKSSSSSSSSSGHHH
 
274-Article Text-1503-1-10-20230609.pdf
274-Article Text-1503-1-10-20230609.pdf274-Article Text-1503-1-10-20230609.pdf
274-Article Text-1503-1-10-20230609.pdf
 
CamScanner 09-30-2023 09.22.pdf
CamScanner 09-30-2023 09.22.pdfCamScanner 09-30-2023 09.22.pdf
CamScanner 09-30-2023 09.22.pdf
 
fenrg-11-1120635-1.pdf
fenrg-11-1120635-1.pdffenrg-11-1120635-1.pdf
fenrg-11-1120635-1.pdf
 
7285665.pdf
7285665.pdf7285665.pdf
7285665.pdf
 
pdfcoffee.com_i-openwells-basics-training-3-pdf-free.pdf
pdfcoffee.com_i-openwells-basics-training-3-pdf-free.pdfpdfcoffee.com_i-openwells-basics-training-3-pdf-free.pdf
pdfcoffee.com_i-openwells-basics-training-3-pdf-free.pdf
 
WildWell_TechDataBook-2018web.pdf
WildWell_TechDataBook-2018web.pdfWildWell_TechDataBook-2018web.pdf
WildWell_TechDataBook-2018web.pdf
 
M-Hashemi 2281657930 CV.docx
M-Hashemi 2281657930 CV.docxM-Hashemi 2281657930 CV.docx
M-Hashemi 2281657930 CV.docx
 
s00254-004-1088-y.pdf
s00254-004-1088-y.pdfs00254-004-1088-y.pdf
s00254-004-1088-y.pdf
 
192282-MS.pdf
192282-MS.pdf192282-MS.pdf
192282-MS.pdf
 
Rig Equipment
Rig EquipmentRig Equipment
Rig Equipment
 
SPE171748 Surface Safety System for ZADCO (4).pdf
SPE171748 Surface Safety System for ZADCO (4).pdfSPE171748 Surface Safety System for ZADCO (4).pdf
SPE171748 Surface Safety System for ZADCO (4).pdf
 
Mud_volcanoes_in_the_South_Caspian_basin_Nature_an.pdf
Mud_volcanoes_in_the_South_Caspian_basin_Nature_an.pdfMud_volcanoes_in_the_South_Caspian_basin_Nature_an.pdf
Mud_volcanoes_in_the_South_Caspian_basin_Nature_an.pdf
 
Back-off Procedure.docx
Back-off Procedure.docxBack-off Procedure.docx
Back-off Procedure.docx
 

Recently uploaded

Manufacturing Process of molasses based distillery ppt.pptx
Manufacturing Process of molasses based distillery ppt.pptxManufacturing Process of molasses based distillery ppt.pptx
Manufacturing Process of molasses based distillery ppt.pptx
Madan Karki
 
Generative AI leverages algorithms to create various forms of content
Generative AI leverages algorithms to create various forms of contentGenerative AI leverages algorithms to create various forms of content
Generative AI leverages algorithms to create various forms of content
Hitesh Mohapatra
 
Advanced control scheme of doubly fed induction generator for wind turbine us...
Advanced control scheme of doubly fed induction generator for wind turbine us...Advanced control scheme of doubly fed induction generator for wind turbine us...
Advanced control scheme of doubly fed induction generator for wind turbine us...
IJECEIAES
 
Literature Review Basics and Understanding Reference Management.pptx
Literature Review Basics and Understanding Reference Management.pptxLiterature Review Basics and Understanding Reference Management.pptx
Literature Review Basics and Understanding Reference Management.pptx
Dr Ramhari Poudyal
 
ISPM 15 Heat Treated Wood Stamps and why your shipping must have one
ISPM 15 Heat Treated Wood Stamps and why your shipping must have oneISPM 15 Heat Treated Wood Stamps and why your shipping must have one
ISPM 15 Heat Treated Wood Stamps and why your shipping must have one
Las Vegas Warehouse
 
KuberTENes Birthday Bash Guadalajara - K8sGPT first impressions
KuberTENes Birthday Bash Guadalajara - K8sGPT first impressionsKuberTENes Birthday Bash Guadalajara - K8sGPT first impressions
KuberTENes Birthday Bash Guadalajara - K8sGPT first impressions
Victor Morales
 
22CYT12-Unit-V-E Waste and its Management.ppt
22CYT12-Unit-V-E Waste and its Management.ppt22CYT12-Unit-V-E Waste and its Management.ppt
22CYT12-Unit-V-E Waste and its Management.ppt
KrishnaveniKrishnara1
 
Unit-III-ELECTROCHEMICAL STORAGE DEVICES.ppt
Unit-III-ELECTROCHEMICAL STORAGE DEVICES.pptUnit-III-ELECTROCHEMICAL STORAGE DEVICES.ppt
Unit-III-ELECTROCHEMICAL STORAGE DEVICES.ppt
KrishnaveniKrishnara1
 
132/33KV substation case study Presentation
132/33KV substation case study Presentation132/33KV substation case study Presentation
132/33KV substation case study Presentation
kandramariana6
 
IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Society as a Graduate Student Member
IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Society as a Graduate Student MemberIEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Society as a Graduate Student Member
IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Society as a Graduate Student Member
VICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ
 
Engine Lubrication performance System.pdf
Engine Lubrication performance System.pdfEngine Lubrication performance System.pdf
Engine Lubrication performance System.pdf
mamamaam477
 
A SYSTEMATIC RISK ASSESSMENT APPROACH FOR SECURING THE SMART IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
A SYSTEMATIC RISK ASSESSMENT APPROACH FOR SECURING THE SMART IRRIGATION SYSTEMSA SYSTEMATIC RISK ASSESSMENT APPROACH FOR SECURING THE SMART IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
A SYSTEMATIC RISK ASSESSMENT APPROACH FOR SECURING THE SMART IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
IJNSA Journal
 
Computational Engineering IITH Presentation
Computational Engineering IITH PresentationComputational Engineering IITH Presentation
Computational Engineering IITH Presentation
co23btech11018
 
Iron and Steel Technology Roadmap - Towards more sustainable steelmaking.pdf
Iron and Steel Technology Roadmap - Towards more sustainable steelmaking.pdfIron and Steel Technology Roadmap - Towards more sustainable steelmaking.pdf
Iron and Steel Technology Roadmap - Towards more sustainable steelmaking.pdf
RadiNasr
 
ACEP Magazine edition 4th launched on 05.06.2024
ACEP Magazine edition 4th launched on 05.06.2024ACEP Magazine edition 4th launched on 05.06.2024
ACEP Magazine edition 4th launched on 05.06.2024
Rahul
 
Presentation of IEEE Slovenia CIS (Computational Intelligence Society) Chapte...
Presentation of IEEE Slovenia CIS (Computational Intelligence Society) Chapte...Presentation of IEEE Slovenia CIS (Computational Intelligence Society) Chapte...
Presentation of IEEE Slovenia CIS (Computational Intelligence Society) Chapte...
University of Maribor
 
New techniques for characterising damage in rock slopes.pdf
New techniques for characterising damage in rock slopes.pdfNew techniques for characterising damage in rock slopes.pdf
New techniques for characterising damage in rock slopes.pdf
wisnuprabawa3
 
ML Based Model for NIDS MSc Updated Presentation.v2.pptx
ML Based Model for NIDS MSc Updated Presentation.v2.pptxML Based Model for NIDS MSc Updated Presentation.v2.pptx
ML Based Model for NIDS MSc Updated Presentation.v2.pptx
JamalHussainArman
 
CSM Cloud Service Management Presentarion
CSM Cloud Service Management PresentarionCSM Cloud Service Management Presentarion
CSM Cloud Service Management Presentarion
rpskprasana
 
学校原版美国波士顿大学毕业证学历学位证书原版一模一样
学校原版美国波士顿大学毕业证学历学位证书原版一模一样学校原版美国波士顿大学毕业证学历学位证书原版一模一样
学校原版美国波士顿大学毕业证学历学位证书原版一模一样
171ticu
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Manufacturing Process of molasses based distillery ppt.pptx
Manufacturing Process of molasses based distillery ppt.pptxManufacturing Process of molasses based distillery ppt.pptx
Manufacturing Process of molasses based distillery ppt.pptx
 
Generative AI leverages algorithms to create various forms of content
Generative AI leverages algorithms to create various forms of contentGenerative AI leverages algorithms to create various forms of content
Generative AI leverages algorithms to create various forms of content
 
Advanced control scheme of doubly fed induction generator for wind turbine us...
Advanced control scheme of doubly fed induction generator for wind turbine us...Advanced control scheme of doubly fed induction generator for wind turbine us...
Advanced control scheme of doubly fed induction generator for wind turbine us...
 
Literature Review Basics and Understanding Reference Management.pptx
Literature Review Basics and Understanding Reference Management.pptxLiterature Review Basics and Understanding Reference Management.pptx
Literature Review Basics and Understanding Reference Management.pptx
 
ISPM 15 Heat Treated Wood Stamps and why your shipping must have one
ISPM 15 Heat Treated Wood Stamps and why your shipping must have oneISPM 15 Heat Treated Wood Stamps and why your shipping must have one
ISPM 15 Heat Treated Wood Stamps and why your shipping must have one
 
KuberTENes Birthday Bash Guadalajara - K8sGPT first impressions
KuberTENes Birthday Bash Guadalajara - K8sGPT first impressionsKuberTENes Birthday Bash Guadalajara - K8sGPT first impressions
KuberTENes Birthday Bash Guadalajara - K8sGPT first impressions
 
22CYT12-Unit-V-E Waste and its Management.ppt
22CYT12-Unit-V-E Waste and its Management.ppt22CYT12-Unit-V-E Waste and its Management.ppt
22CYT12-Unit-V-E Waste and its Management.ppt
 
Unit-III-ELECTROCHEMICAL STORAGE DEVICES.ppt
Unit-III-ELECTROCHEMICAL STORAGE DEVICES.pptUnit-III-ELECTROCHEMICAL STORAGE DEVICES.ppt
Unit-III-ELECTROCHEMICAL STORAGE DEVICES.ppt
 
132/33KV substation case study Presentation
132/33KV substation case study Presentation132/33KV substation case study Presentation
132/33KV substation case study Presentation
 
IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Society as a Graduate Student Member
IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Society as a Graduate Student MemberIEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Society as a Graduate Student Member
IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Society as a Graduate Student Member
 
Engine Lubrication performance System.pdf
Engine Lubrication performance System.pdfEngine Lubrication performance System.pdf
Engine Lubrication performance System.pdf
 
A SYSTEMATIC RISK ASSESSMENT APPROACH FOR SECURING THE SMART IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
A SYSTEMATIC RISK ASSESSMENT APPROACH FOR SECURING THE SMART IRRIGATION SYSTEMSA SYSTEMATIC RISK ASSESSMENT APPROACH FOR SECURING THE SMART IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
A SYSTEMATIC RISK ASSESSMENT APPROACH FOR SECURING THE SMART IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
 
Computational Engineering IITH Presentation
Computational Engineering IITH PresentationComputational Engineering IITH Presentation
Computational Engineering IITH Presentation
 
Iron and Steel Technology Roadmap - Towards more sustainable steelmaking.pdf
Iron and Steel Technology Roadmap - Towards more sustainable steelmaking.pdfIron and Steel Technology Roadmap - Towards more sustainable steelmaking.pdf
Iron and Steel Technology Roadmap - Towards more sustainable steelmaking.pdf
 
ACEP Magazine edition 4th launched on 05.06.2024
ACEP Magazine edition 4th launched on 05.06.2024ACEP Magazine edition 4th launched on 05.06.2024
ACEP Magazine edition 4th launched on 05.06.2024
 
Presentation of IEEE Slovenia CIS (Computational Intelligence Society) Chapte...
Presentation of IEEE Slovenia CIS (Computational Intelligence Society) Chapte...Presentation of IEEE Slovenia CIS (Computational Intelligence Society) Chapte...
Presentation of IEEE Slovenia CIS (Computational Intelligence Society) Chapte...
 
New techniques for characterising damage in rock slopes.pdf
New techniques for characterising damage in rock slopes.pdfNew techniques for characterising damage in rock slopes.pdf
New techniques for characterising damage in rock slopes.pdf
 
ML Based Model for NIDS MSc Updated Presentation.v2.pptx
ML Based Model for NIDS MSc Updated Presentation.v2.pptxML Based Model for NIDS MSc Updated Presentation.v2.pptx
ML Based Model for NIDS MSc Updated Presentation.v2.pptx
 
CSM Cloud Service Management Presentarion
CSM Cloud Service Management PresentarionCSM Cloud Service Management Presentarion
CSM Cloud Service Management Presentarion
 
学校原版美国波士顿大学毕业证学历学位证书原版一模一样
学校原版美国波士顿大学毕业证学历学位证书原版一模一样学校原版美国波士顿大学毕业证学历学位证书原版一模一样
学校原版美国波士顿大学毕业证学历学位证书原版一模一样
 

preview-dd.pdf

  • 1. Copyright © 2015 DIRECTIONAL DRILLING DD-1 IADC Drilling Manual Evolution of directional drilling since 1900 Directional drilling is the science of controlling or correcting a wellbore, along a predetermined trajectory, to one or more underground targets or locations at given horizontal dis- placements (HD) and true vertical depths (TVD) from the point of origin. The central advantage of drilling directionally is that significantly more of the production formation is ex- posed to the well, compared to vertical wells (Figures DD-1 and DD-2). These techniques have been integral parts of the oil and gas industry since the 1920s. Operators must maintain well- bore verticality, construct curves (inclination builds and/or drops) and maintain tangents all in a specific direction. Ap- plications include drilling to difficult-to-access locations and at river crossings as well as drilling relief wells, sidetrack- ing, drilling multiple wells from one surface location or main wellbore (multilaterals) and drilling with wellbores having inclinations up to and exceeding 90°. High-inclination wells (80°+) are considered horizontal and have significantly aug- mented production due to their increased reservoir expo- sure as compared to their low-angle counterparts. Extend- ed-reach (ER) wells push the horizontal limits of directional drilling even further. Directional drilling has found a respected place in oilfields worldwide. Historically, engineers have used established methods based on years of prior experience to advance the science toward modern techniques. Directional drilling techniques were designed to improve the mechanics of de- viated wells so that multiple boreholes could be drilled from one location and at various angles. These techniques allow drilling to contact larger quantity of oil and gas reserves, thereby minimizing associated drilling costs, as well as envi- ronmental impact. 1900-1920s Directional drilling has come a long way since its origins. Through most of the 1800s, wells ostensibly went in only one direction—straight down. It was in the 1920s that the industry first became aware of wellbore deviation of appar- ently vertical holes. Once these holes could be surveyed, operators discovered that, having had no prior method for measuring inclination or direction, they had unknowingly drilled holes with up to 50° +/- of inclination. Deviation ten- dencies caused by formation dips, faults, bedding planes, etc., acting on the drill bit were causing the drift away from vertical. The bending characteristics of the drillstring, cou- pled with the amount of weight applied to the bit, were also factors affecting the desired outcome. Ultimately, surveys consisting of depth, inclination and direction would be used to accurately calculate a well’s position. The acid bottle technique, developed in the late 1800s in South African diamond mines to survey boreholes, became in the 1920s, the first method to be utilized solely for mea- suring inclination. A glass bottle filled with acid was lowered into the borehole where the acid would settle at an angle in the bottle lying parallel to the angle of inclination. After some time, the acid etched the glass, which allowed calcu- Bent Housing Motors Relief Well Steel Whipsticks Hardwood Wedges Gyroscopic technology development Gyro MWD Rotary Steerable Systems Measurement While Drilling (MWD) Multilateral in Russia Entirely Vertical/blind “Straight Holes” Magnetic Single Shot Mud Motor Surface Readout Gyro 1900 1910 1920 Acid bottle Surveying Totco Drift tool Magnetic Steering tools North Seeking Gyro Stabilized Rotary BHAs Jetting method Horizontal Drilling Viable Adjustable Gauge Stabs Extended Reach Record 41,667 ft* Gyro Steering Tool * Set by Exxon Neftegas Ltd on the Sahkalin Shelf during 2013 Figure DD-1: Evolution of directional drilling.
  • 2. Copyright © 2015 IADC Drilling Manual DD-2 DIRECTIONAL DRILLING lation of the wellbore’s inclination at a given depth. In the 1920s, Totco developed the mechanical drift recorder, which could only measure borehole inclination but was more accu- rate than the acid bottle and other early techniques. Unfortunately, neither of these methods shed light on the direction of well drift. The drive for wellbore control tech- niques and improved surveying methods was partly ac- celerated by the possibility that wells were drifting across lease lines. This led to court decrees that lease holders only owned deposits found within the downward vertical projec- tion of their lease lines. Few at the time possessed technol- ogy enabling control of well drift. Among those leaseholders who did, some could not resist the temptation to produce oil from an unaware neighbor. Another method, developed by George Maas, used an ac- id-etch test tube in parallel with a compass needle that would lock into cooling gelatin, to record both inclination and direction. A vacuum flask was used to protect the gel- atin from external heat in the borehole. This development was first described around 1912, yet the heat-shield principle is still used in modern survey instruments. In 1926, Sun Oil enlisted Sperry Corporation to use gyro- scopic-based technology to make survey instruments for accurately measuring borehole inclination and direction. The rotating gyroscopes provided accurate measurements across three different axes and allowed drillers to accurately determine a borehole’s azimuth and inclination. The first magnetic single-shot and multi-shot instruments, which measured both inclination and direction, were devel- oped in 1929 by H. John Eastman. These instruments used sensors employing magnetic compass needles and plumb bobs. They also featured mechanical timers that triggered a simple camera to record the survey on photographic film. The science of controlled directional drilling did not come about until the development of these magnetic single-shot and multi-shot instruments. There were three natural consequences of these accurate surveying methods: intentionally deviating wells to precise bottomhole locations; restricting vertical wells to at most a few degrees in inclination; and limiting the resultant well- bore drift. The first deliberately deviated wells were drilled in the late 1920s. Hardwood wedges were used, pushing the bit to one side of the hole and producing a deflection to di- rect the wells from vertical toward an intended direction. 1930s In 1930, a French inventor named René Moineau discovered the principle of the progressive cavity pump which led to the development of downhole positive displacement motors (PDMs). PDMs would eventually become the most effective and commonly used deviation tools in the industry. Records from two wells drilled in Huntington Beach, Cali- fornia, in 1930 are the first records from directionally con- trolled boreholes drilled from an onshore location to oil/gas deposits under the ocean (offshore). The steel whipstock was the main deflection tool used from the 1930s until the 1950s. Early whipstocks were simply lowered into the bore- hole, oriented with the whip face in the desired direction and mechanically anchored at the bottom of the main well- bore (Figure DD-3). When the wellbore drifted off course, a whipstock was set and drilling operations would be divert- ed along the whip face. No attempts were made to retrieve these whipstocks and they were typically abandoned in the well. Beginning in 1932, directional wells were regularly drilled along the beachfront beneath the ocean. In 1933, the Signal Hill field was developed in Long Beach, Calif. The orientation of directional tools, including whipstocks, was accomplished by using a visual surface reference and maintaining the tool facing while it was lowered into the hole. Another method entailed running in a survey instru- ment so that it landed in a special mule-shoe key designed to Figure DD-2: Key parameters in directional drilling.
  • 3. Copyright © 2015 DIRECTIONAL DRILLING DD-3 IADC Drilling Manual align it with the tool facing (Figure DD-4). This was record- ed as a reference to the magnetic direction or high side of an inclined wellbore and the deviation tool could then be turned to the desired facing/direction. In 1934, a blowout occurred in a field owned by Humble Oil Company of Conroe, Texas. A gas kick from a high-pressure zone ignited, and the entire rig was engulfed in flames. After many months and attempts to bring the fire under control, other nearby rigs had to be closed down and the entire field was threatened. H. John Eastman, with his experience using whipstocks and surveying instruments, used a mobile drill- ing truck to drill a directional relief well close enough to the blowout well, killing the blowout on the first attempt. The oil industry subsequently accepted directional drilling as a reliable technique (Figure DD-5). 1940s-1960s It’s likely that basic stabilized rotary bottomhole assembly (BHA) designs with drill collars for weight and stiffness, to- gether with stabilizers precisely positioned for inclination control while drilling, originated in the 1940s. Historically, it had been possible to control the angle of directional wells during rotary drilling by correct design of the assembly and use of suitable drilling parameters. The three basic princi- ples included holding inclination (locked/packed), building inclination (fulcrum) and dropping inclination (pendulum). Drill collars, when used without stabilization, tended to buckle and cause unwanted deviation and poor hole quality. Multiple stabilizers were positioned to increase the stiffness or to promote the natural bending of the drill collars, thereby pointing the drill bit or applying a side force to encourage the wellbore in a specific trajectory. Control of hole direction had traditionally been poor with basic rotary assemblies. Roller-cone bits usually walked to the right (clockwise), and directional control was previous- ly limited to using well-stabilized assemblies to reduce this tendency. The normal prior practice with non-steerable as- semblies was to lead the well an estimated amount to the left of the plan, thereby compensating for anticipated turns. Magnetic instruments naturally needed to be seated in a nonmagnetic environment if they were to run inside the drillstring to accurately measure direction. In the 1940s, nonmagnetic drill collars (NMDC) were placed in the lowest possible position of the drillstring with a crow’s foot baffle plate inserted below it. This allowed the drilling fluid to pass through the drillstring and, at the same time, provide a con- venient seat for the survey instrument. Gyroscopic surveying, developed as early as 1929, was continuously improved from the 1940s to the 1960s. Gy- ros were also used to measure inclination, azimuth and the Ready to Start Drilling Drilling Ahead on Whipstock In Closed Position Pin Sheared Drilling Ahead in New Hole Whipstock Locked for Setting Muleshoe stinger Key Muleshoe stinger Key Figure DD-3: Wellbore deviation with whipstocks. Figure DD-4: One method to orient directional tools was running in a survey instrument to land in a special mule- shoe key designed to align it with the tool facing. Figure DD-5: Directional drilling is well accepted as a reliable technique to drill relief wells to kill blowouts. First recorded application was in 1934.
  • 4. Copyright © 2015 IADC Drilling Manual DD-4 DIRECTIONAL DRILLING deviation tool orientation. While magnetic instruments are dependent on the Earth’s natural lines of magnetic force, gy- ros use a gyroscopic compass to maintain a fixed-reference direction and to measure relative changes in direction at se- lected depths with the aid of a timer. This surveying technol- ogy enabled even more directional drilling applications, as it could be used in magnetic environments, e.g., for accurately sidetracking from inside the casing in a vertical hole where magnetic toolfaces would otherwise be impossible to orient or when drilling suffers from magnetic interference from nearby wells. The jetting technique was developed in the mid-1950s. Rarely used in the 21st century, it is still a valid and inexpen- sive deviation method for soft formations. A special jet bit may be used, but it is also common practice to use a stan- dard soft formation tri-cone bit with one very large nozzle and two smaller ones. The idea is to point the big jet in the desired direction. With the majority of flow passing through the large-bore nozzle (big jet), the hole preferentially wash- es in the direction of the large nozzle and forms a pocket. Drilling can continue with the assembly following the direc- tion of the pocket (Figure DD-6). While jetting is not common today, it can be useful tight an- ti-collision scenarios exist in surface holes. Other notable points about jetting include: • It is relatively inexpensive compared to conventional deflection tools; • It allows surveys to be taken closer to the bit than any other deflection method; • Jetting dogleg response can be inconsistent and difficult to predict; • Effectiveness is reduced as bit diameter and BHA tubular diameter increase; • Hole-opening runs are often required, as jetting is often performed in 8 ½ in. and 12 ¼ in. holes. The first downhole drilling motors or mud motors were de- signed and manufactured by Dyna-Drill in 1958. The mo- tor was based on the 1930 Moineau design for progressive cavity pumps. The mud motor’s molded elastomeric insert, which is bonded to the inside of a cylindrical steel case, comprises the stator of the pump or motor unit. A helical rotor with one or more lobes rotates eccentrically within the stator (which contains one more lobe than the rotor). When differential pressure (i.e., mud flow through this power sec- tion) is applied across the assembly, the rotary power ex- tracted from the rotor/stator assembly functions as a motor driving the drill bit. Many power section configurations have been developed, from those that generate high bit speeds Figure DD-6: Jetting was developed in the mid-1950s. Rarely used today, it is still a valid and inexpensive deviation method in soft formations. Courtesy Baker Hughes Inc.
  • 5. Copyright © 2015 DIRECTIONAL DRILLING DD-5 IADC Drilling Manual but are limited to relatively low torque, to those allowing for slower-bit speeds but at a much higher-torque output (Fig- ure DD-7). Mud motors were first used for directional control of bore- holes in the 1960s. A bent sub (a short component for con- necting two longer collars) was positioned directly on top of the mud motor (Figure DD-8). This directional drilling assembly would normally be used whenever the wellbore reached a depth that required deviating, normally to initi- ate/drill a curve or correct the wellbore. With the drillstring not rotating (rotary drive locked), drilling was accomplished by the motor-driven drill bit. This bit still rotated as long as there was mud flow and the ability to make new hole by slid- ing the drillstring. This would in effect kick off the wellbore in the direction of the bent-sub toolface. The BHA was usually pulled back out of the hole to prevent twisting off (breaking) the motor due to high stresses caused when trying to rotate the bent-sub configuration. Basic rotary assemblies would be run to continue controlling the well path until another motor run was necessary. Mud motors were sometimes used in vertical applications where high bit speeds were desirable. They had the added benefit of minimizing erosion and wear on the drillstring and casing strings since the drillstring would not need to be turned as fast due to the reduction of the surface revolutions per minute (RPM). The majority of mud motors were used in directional (deviated) wells. In these wells, one run with the bent-sub configuration could accomplish the same goal as multiple runs with other methods of steering the bit, but with greater accuracy, thus reducing time and cost. The rebel tool was introduced in the 1960s. It was one of the first directional drilling tools to control the direction of lateral wellbore trajectory while rotating and could be set up on surface for a left or right tendency. Inconsistent reliability of these tools led to their declined use in the industry. 1970s Magnetic-steering tools were first used in 1969 but became more common in the 1970s. The steering tool was also used to measure drift, direction and toolface during semi-contin- uous drilling and with downhole directional data available in real time on surface. An instrument assembly containing a magnetic survey package was sent downhole connected by a wireline. It was seated in a mule-shoe orienting sub (also called Universal Bottomhole Orienting sub or UBHO) that was connected to the top of a mud motor, thereby aligning it with the motor’s toolface. A coder converted data measure- ments to electrical pulses and transmitted the measure- ments to the surface through a shielded electric conduit to digital or video displays. Measurements were thus available immediately in real time at the surface for use in directional- ly controlling the wellbore. Even though these early steering tools provided the directional driller with valuable data in real time, the tools would have to be pulled out of the drill- Figure DD-7: Downhole drilling motors were introduced by Dyna-Drill in 1958. Courtesy Baker Hughes Inc. Magnetic single shot Bent sub Downhole mud motor Drill bit Figure DD-8: By the 1970s, mud motors dominated directional drilling. As above, they were used with a bent-sub for directional kick off.