Group decision making involves making choices collectively from alternatives. It can be more effective than individual decisions but also prone to flaws. Some techniques for group decision making include brainstorming, nominal group technique, and Delphi technique. While group decisions benefit from shared information and synergy, they also risk diffusion of responsibility, lower efficiency, and groupthink. Factors like leadership, personalities, and time constraints can influence group behaviors and decisions.
This presentation is based upon the topic "Group decision making".
Its styles and techniques,advantages & disadvantages,group-size,consensus,process group of decision making
This presentation is based upon the topic "Group decision making".
Its styles and techniques,advantages & disadvantages,group-size,consensus,process group of decision making
Group Decision Making Techniques - These techniques are only useful to improve the Group decision making.
1. Brainstorming
2. Nominal Group Technique
3. Delphi Technique
4. Consensus Mapping
Reference - "Principles and Practice of Management" L.M.Prasad
Decision Making remains one enigma for managers. Although no prescription can be offered for mastering this technique yet these fillers will certainly improve your skill
ORGANISATIONAL BEHAVIOUR- Organisational conflict
CAUSES OF CONFLICT
CONSEQUENCES OF CONFLICT
TYPES OF CONFLICT
MANAGEMENT OF CONFLICT
CONFLICT RESOLUTION
Decision Making PowerPoint PPT Content Modern SampleAndrew Schwartz
164 slides include: the 6 C's of decision making, inherent personal and system traps, decision trees, decision making methods and tips, 4 slides on the GOR approach to decision making, common pitfalls in decision making, effective strategies in making decisions, the 8 major decision making traps and how to effectively minimize each, different decision making perspectives, 3 different types of analysis (grid analysis - paired comparison analysis, and cost/benefit analysis), utilizing planning and overarching questions, 4 modes of decision making and 6 factors in decision making plus more.
Group Decision Making Techniques - These techniques are only useful to improve the Group decision making.
1. Brainstorming
2. Nominal Group Technique
3. Delphi Technique
4. Consensus Mapping
Reference - "Principles and Practice of Management" L.M.Prasad
Decision Making remains one enigma for managers. Although no prescription can be offered for mastering this technique yet these fillers will certainly improve your skill
ORGANISATIONAL BEHAVIOUR- Organisational conflict
CAUSES OF CONFLICT
CONSEQUENCES OF CONFLICT
TYPES OF CONFLICT
MANAGEMENT OF CONFLICT
CONFLICT RESOLUTION
Decision Making PowerPoint PPT Content Modern SampleAndrew Schwartz
164 slides include: the 6 C's of decision making, inherent personal and system traps, decision trees, decision making methods and tips, 4 slides on the GOR approach to decision making, common pitfalls in decision making, effective strategies in making decisions, the 8 major decision making traps and how to effectively minimize each, different decision making perspectives, 3 different types of analysis (grid analysis - paired comparison analysis, and cost/benefit analysis), utilizing planning and overarching questions, 4 modes of decision making and 6 factors in decision making plus more.
This document contains the lecture notes on the elements/components of social casework based on the Helen Harris Perlman's five Ps in social casework. Person, Problem, Place, Process, Professional representative.
IMRAN AHMAD SAJID,
Peshawar
The key book for this document is Forsyth's "Group Dynamics". These are lecture notes for BS students of Social Work and Sociology, 1st semester, University of Peshawar.
Dr. Fred C. Lunenburg [1]. group decision making nftej v20 n3 2010William Kritsonis
Dr. Fred C. Lunenburg, www.nationalforum.com, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Editor-in-Chief, National FORUM Journals, Houston, Texas
www.nationalforum.com
Dr. Fred C. Lunenburg, lunenburg, Devil's Advocacy & Dialectical Inquiry - IN...William Kritsonis
Dr. Fred C. Lunenburg, lunenburg, Devil's Advocacy & Dialectical Inquiry - INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCHOLARLY ACADEMIC INTELLECTUAL DIVERSITY - www.nationalforum.com - Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Editor-in-Chief, Houston, Texas
Group decision making refers to the process of making a collective decision by a group of individuals. It is a common practice in many organizations and can be used in a variety of situations, such as when developing new strategies, setting goals, solving problems, and selecting a course of action.
There are various approaches to group decision making, and each approach has its own advantages and disadvantages
A comparatative study on maggi&top ramenRishi vyas
Different companies and their brands are available in the FMCG (fast moving consumer goods) sector for customers like SUNFEAST,WAI-WAI,KNORR, NESTLE , NISSIN and so many others.
The final decision of purchasing a product is totally dependent on the customer.
To analyze customers’ requirements.
To make a comparative study report ON MAGGI & TOP RAMEN
To know the opinion and suggestions of customers.
EXPENSE TREND ANALYSIS OF CENURY PLY BOARDS.Rishi vyas
Century Ply boards, incorporated in 1982, is well–known manufacturer of plywood and decorative veneers. The company was formed by Sajjan Bhajanka and Sanjay Aggarwal. The manufacturing facility of company is located at Bishnupur near Joka, Kolkata.
A study on issues related to implementation of an Enterprise Resource Plannin...Rishi vyas
ERP is a business management software, usually a suite of integrated applications that a company can use to collect, store, manage and interpret data from many business activities.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
We all have good and bad thoughts from time to time and situation to situation. We are bombarded daily with spiraling thoughts(both negative and positive) creating all-consuming feel , making us difficult to manage with associated suffering. Good thoughts are like our Mob Signal (Positive thought) amidst noise(negative thought) in the atmosphere. Negative thoughts like noise outweigh positive thoughts. These thoughts often create unwanted confusion, trouble, stress and frustration in our mind as well as chaos in our physical world. Negative thoughts are also known as “distorted thinking”.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
How to Create Map Views in the Odoo 17 ERPCeline George
The map views are useful for providing a geographical representation of data. They allow users to visualize and analyze the data in a more intuitive manner.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
1. ’’GROUP DECISION MAKING ’’
Presentation on project
topic
Presenter members:-
Rishi kumar vyas
2. ROOTS OF GROUP DECISION MAKING - 1978
Herbert Alexander Simon (June 15, 1916 – February 9, 2001)
Simon was among the founding fathers of several of today's
important scientific domains, including artificial intelligence,
information processing, decision-making, problem-solving,
attention economics, organization theory, AND complex systems.
He receive the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics "for his
pioneering research into the decision-making process within
economic organizations" (1978).
3. GROUP DECISION MAKING An Overview
It is a situation faced when individuals
collectively make a choice from the alternatives
before them.
Decisions made collectively tend to be more
effective than decisions made by a single
individual. However, there are also examples
where the decisions made by a group are
flawed,
Bay of Pigs invasion
4. Factors that impact group behaviors also affect
group decisions. Like:
1. Designation/status
2. Dominative character
3. Experience/Age
4. limited time
5. Facts and figures
6. Economical condition
7. Financial constraints
5. GROUP DECISION MAKING TECHNIQUES
i. Brainstorming
This technique involves a group of people, usually between five and ten,
sitting around a table, generating ideas in the form of free association. The
primary focus is on generation of ideas rather them on evaluation of ideas.
Brainstorming technique is very effective when the problem is
comparatively specific.
ii. Nominal Group Technique (NGT)
Nominal group technique is similar to brainstorming except that the
approach is more structured. Members form the group in name only and
operate independently, generating ideas for solving the problem on their
own, in silence and in writing. Members do not interact with each other so
that strong personality domination is avoided. It encourages individual
creativity.
6. iii. Delphi Technique:
This technique is the modification of the nominal group technique
1. The problem is identified and a sample of experts is selected.
These experts are asked to provide potential solutions through a
series of carefully designed questionnaires.
2. Each expert completes and returns the initial questionnaire.
3. The results of the questionnaire are compiled at a central location
and the central coordinator prepares a second questionnaire based
on the previous answers.
4. Each member receives a copy of the results along with the second
questionnaire.
5. Members are asked to review the results and respond to second
questionnaire. The results typically trigger new solutions or cause
changes in the original position.
6. The process is repeated until a consensus is reached.
7. iv. Didactic interaction:
This technique is applicable only in certain situations, but is an
excellent method when such a situation exists. The type of problem
should be such that it results in a yes-no solution. For example, the
decision may be to buy or not to buy, to merge or not to merge, to
expand or not to expand and so on. Such a decision requires an
extensive and exhaustive discussion and investigation since a wrong
decision can have serious consequences.
8. Decision-making in social settings
Decision-making in groups is sometimes examined separately as process
and outcome. Process refers to the group interactions.
The use of politics is often judged negatively, but it is a useful way to
approach problems when preferences among actors are in conflict.
Gathering
Sub-committee
Participatory
There are no perfect decision-making rules. Depending on how the rules are
implemented in practice and the situation, all of these can lead to situations
where either no decision is made, or to situations where decisions made are
inconsistent with one another over time.
9. Social decision schemes
Social decision schemes are the methods used by a group to combine individual response
to come up with a single group decision. There are a number of these schemes, but the
following are the most common:
Delegation
An individual, subgroup or external party makes the decision on behalf of the group. For
instance, in an "authority scheme", the leader makes the decision.
Averaging
Group member makes their own independent decision, later "averaged" to produce a decis
Plurality
Group members vote on their preferences, either privately or publicly. These votes are the
used to select a decision, either by simple majority, supermajority or other more or less
complicated voting system.
Unanimity
A consensus scheme whereby the group discusses the issue until it reaches a unanimous
agreement. This decision rule is what dictates the decision-making for most juries.
Random
The group leaves the choice to chance. For example, flipping a coin.
10. DECISION MAKING IN CORPORATES
Individual Decision Making
Decision making without a group's input or a decision made regardless of the
group's opinion is, naturally, an individual decision. This is the more traditional
decision making approach and can work effectively for a manager when the
group's input is not required or in certain cases, desired.
Group Decision Making
There are several models of group decision making that you can put to use.
Two examples are consensus and consultation. Consensus decision making
involves posing several options to the group and using the most popular option
to make a decision.
Consultation
Consultation takes the opinions of the group into consideration when making a
decision. Both methods require the group's participation and call for a manager
who respects the opinions and input of the group in the decision making
process.
11. Advantages of Group Decision Making
Group decision making provides two advantages over decisions made by individuals:
synergy and sharing of information.
Synergy is the idea that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. When a group
makes a decision collectively, its judgment can be keener than that of any of its
members. Through discussion, questioning, and collaboration, group members can
identify more complete and robust solutions and recommendations.
The sharing of information among group members is another advantage of the group
decision-making process. Group decisions take into account a broader scope of
information since each group member may contribute unique information and
expertise. Sharing information can increase understanding, clarify issues, and
facilitate movement toward a collective decision.
12. Disadvantages of Group Decision Making
1. Diffusion of Responsibility
One possible disadvantage of group decision making is that it can create a diffusion of
responsibility that results in a lack of accountability for outcomes. In a sense, if everyone
is responsible for a decision, then no one is. Moreover, group decisions can make it
easier for members to deny personal responsibility and blame others for bad decisions.
2. Lower Efficiency
Group decisions can also be less efficient than those made by an individual. Group
decisions can take additional time because there is the requirement of participation,
discussion, and coordination among group members. Without good facilitation and
structure, meetings can get bogged down in trivial details that may matter a lot to one
person but not to the others.
13. 3.Groupthink
One of the greatest inhibitors of effective group decision making is groupthink.
Groupthink is a psychological phenomenon that occurs within a group of
people in which the desire for harmony or conformity results in an irrational or
dysfunctional decision-making outcome. By isolating themselves from outside
influences and actively suppressing dissenting viewpoints in the interest of
minimizing conflict, group members reach a consensus decision without critical
evaluation of alternative viewpoints.
Loyalty to the group requires individuals to avoid raising controversial issues or
alternative solutions, and there is a loss of individual creativity, uniqueness,
and independent thinking. The dysfunctional group dynamics of the in-group
produces an illusion of invulnerability (an inflated certainty that the right
decision has been made). Thus the in-group significantly overrates its own
decision-making abilities and significantly underrates the abilities of its
opponents (the out-group). Furthermore, groupthink can produce
dehumanizing actions against the out-group.