For a long time, relational database management systems have been the only solution for persistent data store. However, with the phenomenal growth of data, this conventional way of storing has become problematic.
To manage the exponentially growing data traffic, largest information technology companies such as Google, Amazon and Yahoo have developed alternative solutions that store data in what have come to be known as NoSQL databases.
Some of the NoSQL features are flexible schema, horizontal scaling and no ACID support. NoSQL databases store and replicate data in distributed systems, often across datacenters, to achieve scalability and reliability.
The CAP theorem states that any networked shared-data system (e.g. NoSQL) can have at most two of three desirable properties:
• consistency(C) - equivalent to having a single up-to-date copy of the data
• availability(A) of that data (for reads and writes)
• tolerance to network partitions(P)
Because of this inherent tradeoff, it is necessary to sacrifice one of these properties. The general belief is that designers cannot sacrifice P and therefore have a difficult choice between C and A.
In this seminar two NoSQL databases are presented: Amazon's Dynamo, which sacrifices consistency thereby achieving very high availability and Google's BigTable, which guarantees strong consistency while provides only best-effort availability.
For a long time, relational database management systems have been the only solution for persistent data store. However, with the phenomenal growth of data, this conventional way of storing has become problematic.
To manage the exponentially growing data traffic, largest information technology companies such as Google, Amazon and Yahoo have developed alternative solutions that store data in what have come to be known as NoSQL databases.
Some of the NoSQL features are flexible schema, horizontal scaling and no ACID support. NoSQL databases store and replicate data in distributed systems, often across datacenters, to achieve scalability and reliability.
The CAP theorem states that any networked shared-data system (e.g. NoSQL) can have at most two of three desirable properties:
• consistency(C) - equivalent to having a single up-to-date copy of the data
• availability(A) of that data (for reads and writes)
• tolerance to network partitions(P)
Because of this inherent tradeoff, it is necessary to sacrifice one of these properties. The general belief is that designers cannot sacrifice P and therefore have a difficult choice between C and A.
In this seminar two NoSQL databases are presented: Amazon's Dynamo, which sacrifices consistency thereby achieving very high availability and Google's BigTable, which guarantees strong consistency while provides only best-effort availability.
The Google File System (GFS) presented in 2003 is the inspiration for the Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS). Let's take a deep dive into GFS to better understand Hadoop.
Distribution transparency and Distributed transactionshraddha mane
Distribution transparency and Distributed transaction.deadlock detection .Distributed transaction and their types and threads and processes and their difference.
This presentation discusses the follow topics
What is Hadoop?
Need for Hadoop
History of Hadoop
Hadoop Overview
Advantages and Disadvantages of Hadoop
Hadoop Distributed File System
Comparing: RDBMS vs. Hadoop
Advantages and Disadvantages of HDFS
Hadoop frameworks
Modules of Hadoop frameworks
Features of 'Hadoop‘
Hadoop Analytics Tools
This is the Complete Information about Data Replication you need, i am focused on these topics:
What is replication?
Who use it?
Types ?
Implementation Methods?
I promise that understand NoSQL is as easy as playing with LEGO bricks ! The Google Bigtable presented in 2006 is the inspiration for Apache HBase: let's take a deep dive into Bigtable to better understand Hbase.
The Google File System (GFS) presented in 2003 is the inspiration for the Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS). Let's take a deep dive into GFS to better understand Hadoop.
Distribution transparency and Distributed transactionshraddha mane
Distribution transparency and Distributed transaction.deadlock detection .Distributed transaction and their types and threads and processes and their difference.
This presentation discusses the follow topics
What is Hadoop?
Need for Hadoop
History of Hadoop
Hadoop Overview
Advantages and Disadvantages of Hadoop
Hadoop Distributed File System
Comparing: RDBMS vs. Hadoop
Advantages and Disadvantages of HDFS
Hadoop frameworks
Modules of Hadoop frameworks
Features of 'Hadoop‘
Hadoop Analytics Tools
This is the Complete Information about Data Replication you need, i am focused on these topics:
What is replication?
Who use it?
Types ?
Implementation Methods?
I promise that understand NoSQL is as easy as playing with LEGO bricks ! The Google Bigtable presented in 2006 is the inspiration for Apache HBase: let's take a deep dive into Bigtable to better understand Hbase.
As part of NoSQL series, I presented Google Bigtable paper. In presentation I tried to give some plain introduction to Hadoop, MapReduce, HBase
www.scalability.rs
Modelos de datos relacionales y no relacionalesBEEVA_es
El modelo de datos es el modelo a través del cual percibimos y organizamos nuestros datos. Centrándonos en Bases de Datos, un Modelo de Datos indica cómo interactuamos con los datos almacenados en nuestras Bases de datos.
In this lecture we analyze key-values databases. At first we introduce key-value characteristics, advantages and disadvantages.
Then we analyze the major Key-Value data stores and finally we discuss about Dynamo DB.
In particular we consider how Dynamo DB: How is implemented
1. Motivation Background
2. Partitioning: Consistent Hashing
3. High Availability for writes: Vector Clocks
4. Handling temporary failures: Sloppy Quorum
5. Recovering from failures: Merkle Trees
6. Membership and failure detection: Gossip Protocol
In these slides we introduce Column-Oriented Stores. We deeply analyze Google BigTable. We discuss about features, data model, architecture, components and its implementation. In the second part we discuss all the major open source implementation for column-oriented databases.
AWS re:Invent 2016| DAT318 | Migrating from RDBMS to NoSQL: How Sony Moved fr...Amazon Web Services
In this session, you will learn the key differences between a relational database management service (RDBMS) and non-relational (NoSQL) databases like Amazon DynamoDB. You will learn about suitable and unsuitable use cases for NoSQL databases. You'll learn strategies for migrating from an RDBMS to DynamoDB through a 5-phase, iterative approach. See how Sony migrated an on-premises MySQL database to the cloud with Amazon DynamoDB, and see the results of this migration.
C* Summit 2013: Cassandra at eBay Scale by Feng Qu and Anurag JambhekarDataStax Academy
We have seen rapid adoption of C* at eBay in past two years. We have made tremendous efforts to integrate C* into existing database platforms, including Oracle, MySQL, Postgres, MongoDB, XMP etc.. We also scale C* to meet business requirement and encountered technical challenges you only see at eBay scale, 100TB data on hundreds of nodes. We will share our experience of deployment automation, managing, monitoring, reporting for both Apache Cassandra and DataStax enterprise.
NoSQL databases are currently used in several applications scenarios in contrast to Relations Databases. Several type of Databases there exist. In this presentation we compare Key Value, Column Oriented, Document Oriented and Graph Databases. Using a simple case study there are evaluated pros and cons of the NoSQL databases taken into account.
This is a summary of the sessions I attended at PASS Summit 2017. Out of the week-long conference, I put together these slides to summarize the conference and present at my company. The slides are about my favorite sessions that I found had the most value. The slides included screenshotted demos I personally developed and tested alike the speakers at the conference.
Levelwise PageRank with Loop-Based Dead End Handling Strategy : SHORT REPORT ...Subhajit Sahu
Abstract — Levelwise PageRank is an alternative method of PageRank computation which decomposes the input graph into a directed acyclic block-graph of strongly connected components, and processes them in topological order, one level at a time. This enables calculation for ranks in a distributed fashion without per-iteration communication, unlike the standard method where all vertices are processed in each iteration. It however comes with a precondition of the absence of dead ends in the input graph. Here, the native non-distributed performance of Levelwise PageRank was compared against Monolithic PageRank on a CPU as well as a GPU. To ensure a fair comparison, Monolithic PageRank was also performed on a graph where vertices were split by components. Results indicate that Levelwise PageRank is about as fast as Monolithic PageRank on the CPU, but quite a bit slower on the GPU. Slowdown on the GPU is likely caused by a large submission of small workloads, and expected to be non-issue when the computation is performed on massive graphs.
Opendatabay - Open Data Marketplace.pptxOpendatabay
Opendatabay.com unlocks the power of data for everyone. Open Data Marketplace fosters a collaborative hub for data enthusiasts to explore, share, and contribute to a vast collection of datasets.
First ever open hub for data enthusiasts to collaborate and innovate. A platform to explore, share, and contribute to a vast collection of datasets. Through robust quality control and innovative technologies like blockchain verification, opendatabay ensures the authenticity and reliability of datasets, empowering users to make data-driven decisions with confidence. Leverage cutting-edge AI technologies to enhance the data exploration, analysis, and discovery experience.
From intelligent search and recommendations to automated data productisation and quotation, Opendatabay AI-driven features streamline the data workflow. Finding the data you need shouldn't be a complex. Opendatabay simplifies the data acquisition process with an intuitive interface and robust search tools. Effortlessly explore, discover, and access the data you need, allowing you to focus on extracting valuable insights. Opendatabay breaks new ground with a dedicated, AI-generated, synthetic datasets.
Leverage these privacy-preserving datasets for training and testing AI models without compromising sensitive information. Opendatabay prioritizes transparency by providing detailed metadata, provenance information, and usage guidelines for each dataset, ensuring users have a comprehensive understanding of the data they're working with. By leveraging a powerful combination of distributed ledger technology and rigorous third-party audits Opendatabay ensures the authenticity and reliability of every dataset. Security is at the core of Opendatabay. Marketplace implements stringent security measures, including encryption, access controls, and regular vulnerability assessments, to safeguard your data and protect your privacy.
Techniques to optimize the pagerank algorithm usually fall in two categories. One is to try reducing the work per iteration, and the other is to try reducing the number of iterations. These goals are often at odds with one another. Skipping computation on vertices which have already converged has the potential to save iteration time. Skipping in-identical vertices, with the same in-links, helps reduce duplicate computations and thus could help reduce iteration time. Road networks often have chains which can be short-circuited before pagerank computation to improve performance. Final ranks of chain nodes can be easily calculated. This could reduce both the iteration time, and the number of iterations. If a graph has no dangling nodes, pagerank of each strongly connected component can be computed in topological order. This could help reduce the iteration time, no. of iterations, and also enable multi-iteration concurrency in pagerank computation. The combination of all of the above methods is the STICD algorithm. [sticd] For dynamic graphs, unchanged components whose ranks are unaffected can be skipped altogether.
As Europe's leading economic powerhouse and the fourth-largest hashtag#economy globally, Germany stands at the forefront of innovation and industrial might. Renowned for its precision engineering and high-tech sectors, Germany's economic structure is heavily supported by a robust service industry, accounting for approximately 68% of its GDP. This economic clout and strategic geopolitical stance position Germany as a focal point in the global cyber threat landscape.
In the face of escalating global tensions, particularly those emanating from geopolitical disputes with nations like hashtag#Russia and hashtag#China, hashtag#Germany has witnessed a significant uptick in targeted cyber operations. Our analysis indicates a marked increase in hashtag#cyberattack sophistication aimed at critical infrastructure and key industrial sectors. These attacks range from ransomware campaigns to hashtag#AdvancedPersistentThreats (hashtag#APTs), threatening national security and business integrity.
🔑 Key findings include:
🔍 Increased frequency and complexity of cyber threats.
🔍 Escalation of state-sponsored and criminally motivated cyber operations.
🔍 Active dark web exchanges of malicious tools and tactics.
Our comprehensive report delves into these challenges, using a blend of open-source and proprietary data collection techniques. By monitoring activity on critical networks and analyzing attack patterns, our team provides a detailed overview of the threats facing German entities.
This report aims to equip stakeholders across public and private sectors with the knowledge to enhance their defensive strategies, reduce exposure to cyber risks, and reinforce Germany's resilience against cyber threats.
Adjusting primitives for graph : SHORT REPORT / NOTESSubhajit Sahu
Graph algorithms, like PageRank Compressed Sparse Row (CSR) is an adjacency-list based graph representation that is
Multiply with different modes (map)
1. Performance of sequential execution based vs OpenMP based vector multiply.
2. Comparing various launch configs for CUDA based vector multiply.
Sum with different storage types (reduce)
1. Performance of vector element sum using float vs bfloat16 as the storage type.
Sum with different modes (reduce)
1. Performance of sequential execution based vs OpenMP based vector element sum.
2. Performance of memcpy vs in-place based CUDA based vector element sum.
3. Comparing various launch configs for CUDA based vector element sum (memcpy).
4. Comparing various launch configs for CUDA based vector element sum (in-place).
Sum with in-place strategies of CUDA mode (reduce)
1. Comparing various launch configs for CUDA based vector element sum (in-place).
2. Outline
• Introduction to NoSQL
• Introduction to Dynamo and BigTable
• Dynamo vs. BigTable comparison
• Open source implementations
3. Introduction to NoSQL
• New generation of databases
• Response to a “big data” challenge
• Main characteristics:
– Non-relational
– Distributed
– Fault tolerant
– Scalable
5. Dynamo and BigTable - Introduction
Dynamo (Amazon)
• Giuseppe DeCandia, et al.:
Dynamo: amazon's highly available
key-value store. SOSP 2007
BigTable (Google)
• Fay Chang, et al.: BigTable: A
Distributed Storage System for
Structured Data. OSDI 2006
Highly Available
Key-value Structured Data
7. Architecture
Dynamo
• Decentralized:
– Every node has the same set of
responsibilities as its peers.
– There is no single point of
failure.
BigTable
• Centralized:
– Single master node maintains
all system metadata.
– Other nodes (tablet servers)
handle read and write
requests.
Master
8. Data Model
Dynamo
• Key-value - data is stored as
<key, value> pairs, such that
key is a unique identifier and a
value is an arbitrary entry.
BigTable
• Multidimensional sorted map
– map is indexed by a row key
and a column key, and ordered
by a row key. Column keys are
grouped into sets called
column families.
ValueKey
{
“Name” : ”John”,
“Email” : ”john@g.com”,
“Card” : ”6652”
}
188
{
“Name” : ”Bob”,
“Phone” : ”781455”,
“Card” : ”9875”
}
145
Financial DataPersonal DataUser ID
Card = “9875”Name = "Bob"Phone = "781455"145
Card = “6652”Name = "John"Email = "john@g.com"188
row key column family
column key
9. API
Dynamo
• get – returns an object
associated with the given
key.
• put – associates the given
object with the specified
key.
BigTable
• get – returns values from
the individual rows.
• scan – iterates over multiple
rows.
• put – inserts a value to the
specified table's cell.
• delete – deletes a whole
row or a specified cell inside
a particular row.
10. Security
Dynamo
• No security features
BigTable
• Access control rights are
granted at column family level.
Financial DataPersonal DataRow
Key
Card = “9875”Name = "Bob"Phone = "781455"145
Card = “6652”Name = "John"Email = "john@g.com"188
Views Personal Data
Views/Updates Personal Data
Views/Updates all the Data
11. Partitioning
Dynamo
• Consistent Hashing:
– Each node is assigned to a random
position on the ring.
– Key is hashed to the fixed point on the
ring.
– Node is chosen by walking clockwise from
the hash location.
BigTable
• Data is stored ordered by a row key.
• Each table consists of a set of tablets.
• Each tablet is assigned to exactly one
tablet server.
• METADATA table stores the location of a
tablet under a row key.
A
B
DE
F
G
hash(key)
C
…..id
…..15000
Tablet 1 …..….
…..20000
…..20001
Tablet 2 …..….
…..25000
Tablet-51Tablet-11
Tablet-32Tablet-7
Tablet-16Tablet-8
Tablet-1Tablet-21
Tablet Server 1 Tablet Server 2
12. Replication
Dynamo
• Each data item is replicated at N nodes
(N is a user-defined parameter).
• Each key K is assigned to a coordinator
node.
• Coordinator stores the data associated
with K locally, and also replicates it at
the N-1 healthy clockwise successor
nodes in the ring.
BigTable
• Each tablet is stored in GFS as a
sequence of read-only files called
SSTables.
• SSTables are divided into fixed-size
chunks, and these chunks are stored on
chunkservers.
• Each chunk in GFS is replicated across
multiple chunkservers.
N = 3
A
B
DE
F
G
hash(key)
C
SSTable3SSTable2SSTable1
Chunk3Chunk2Chunk1
Chunk1
Chunk3
Chunk1
Chunk2
Chunkserver 1 Chunkserver 2
Chunk2
Chunk3
Chunkserver 3
13. Storage
Dynamo
• Each node in Dynamo has a
local persistence engine where
data items are stored as binary
objects.
• Different Dynamo instances
may use different persistence
engines (e.g. MySql, BDB)
• Applications choose the
persistence engine based on
their object size distribution.
BigTable
• Data is stored in GFS in SSTable
file format.
• SSTable is an immutable
ordered map, whose keys and
values are arbitrary strings.
• SSTable supports "get by key"
and "get by key range"
requests.
14. Membership and Failure detection
Dynamo
• Gossip-based protocol:
– Each node contacts a peer chosen
at random every second and the
two nodes exchange their
membership data (every node
maintains a persistent view of the
membership).
BigTable
• Failed tablet servers are
identified by regular handshakes
between the master and all tablet
servers.
A
B
DE
F
G
C
Master
15. Dynamo vs. BigTable
BigTableDynamo
centralizeddecentralizedArchitecture
sorted mapkey-valueData model
get, put, scan, deleteget, putAPI
access controlnoSecurity
key range basedconsistent hashingPartitioning
chunkservers in GFS
successor nodes in the
ring
Replication
SSTables in GFSPlug-inStorage
Handshakes initiated by
master
Gossip-based protocol
Membership and failure
detection