Considering applying for CHI's Preparing for Research by Engaging Patient and Public Partners (PREPPP) Award? Check out this slide deck of tips & suggestions for your application.
More info at www.chimb.ca/preppp
Service Assessment Tool for Post-Secondary Student Mental Health
Su-Ting Teo, Ryerson University, Meg Houghton, Humber College, Cheryl Washburn, UBC, John Meissner, Carleton University
In follow up to the CACUSS 2014 presentation: āIn House and Outsourced Health and Counselling Services: How Do They Stack Up?ā, a group of practitioners representing diverse post-secondary institutions across Canada will present a paper to assist campuses in making objective decisions regarding health and counselling services to best meet the needs of their students.
Reflections on Research and Evaluation Reality Jan 2016John Wren
Ā
This PPT presents personal reflections on the challenging environment many researchers and evaluators in government agencies face. The reflections come from 15 years of experience, and observing and listening and talking to colleagues in NZ and Australia.
Showing Appreciation & Building Meaningful RelationshipsCHICommunications
Ā
Learning Objectives:
- Describe methods for meaningful relationship-building
- Discuss challenges & opportunities for implementing appreciation guidelines in your own work
- Implement methods for appreciation beyond financial compensation
The following resource was developed by RESYST for a research uptake workshop held in Kilifi, Kenya.
In this resource:
- Understand the importance of strategic planning for research uptake
- Familiarise key aspects of a research uptake strategy
- Develop research uptake objectives for your research group, project, hub or an event
- Identify key stakeholders using stakeholder analysis techniques
- Review communications channels, outputs and activities
- Explore indicators and tools for monitoring and evaluation
- Key questions to consider in a research uptake strategy
Find more: http://resyst.lshtm.ac.uk/resources/resource-bank-research-uptake
ICCH 2011--Agenda-setting in Routine Ambulatory Encounters: Zackary Berger
Ā
Background: Although studies have demonstrated that physicians often fail to elicit the full spectrum of patient concerns, few studies have described the ways in which physicians elicit concerns and the extent to which they set an explicit agenda.
Methods: We performed a qualitative analysis of audio recorded, transcribed routine patient-provider encounters from the Enhancing Communication and HIV Outcomes (ECHO) Study. We developed themes related to whether and how providers elicit patient concerns and then set an agenda for the visit. We developed a coding scheme that we applied to a random selection of 2 encounters per provider (33 providers, 66 encounters total).
Findings: In 41/66 encounters, providers opened the visit with a general question (āHow are you doing?ā). Seven visits opened with a leading question (āEverythingās okay?ā) and 1 with the provider explicitly asking which concerns s/the patient wanted to discuss. Patients more often responded to these opening questions with brief positive statements (āFineā, n=30) than with actual concerns (n=14). In 12 encounters (18%), the provider continued to elicit concerns until the patient stated that s/he had no further concerns (probe to exhaustion). In 30 encounters, there was no agenda statement. When an agenda statement was made, it most often (n=20) centered on physiciansā priorities. Rarely, there was an agenda statement made by the patient (n=3) or one that was collaboratively negotiated (n=3). In 53% of encounters (n=35), patients brought up new concerns later in their visit.
Implications: Providers frequently use generic opening questions that may not be effective in eliciting patientsā concerns, and then do not continue to elicit further concerns. Negotiation of the visit agenda is rare, and new concerns continue to arise later in most encounters. Providers need further training to more effectively invest in the beginning of each encounter.
Word Count 293
KEY WORDS HIV - communication - decision-making preferences
ā
Service Assessment Tool for Post-Secondary Student Mental Health
Su-Ting Teo, Ryerson University, Meg Houghton, Humber College, Cheryl Washburn, UBC, John Meissner, Carleton University
In follow up to the CACUSS 2014 presentation: āIn House and Outsourced Health and Counselling Services: How Do They Stack Up?ā, a group of practitioners representing diverse post-secondary institutions across Canada will present a paper to assist campuses in making objective decisions regarding health and counselling services to best meet the needs of their students.
Reflections on Research and Evaluation Reality Jan 2016John Wren
Ā
This PPT presents personal reflections on the challenging environment many researchers and evaluators in government agencies face. The reflections come from 15 years of experience, and observing and listening and talking to colleagues in NZ and Australia.
Showing Appreciation & Building Meaningful RelationshipsCHICommunications
Ā
Learning Objectives:
- Describe methods for meaningful relationship-building
- Discuss challenges & opportunities for implementing appreciation guidelines in your own work
- Implement methods for appreciation beyond financial compensation
The following resource was developed by RESYST for a research uptake workshop held in Kilifi, Kenya.
In this resource:
- Understand the importance of strategic planning for research uptake
- Familiarise key aspects of a research uptake strategy
- Develop research uptake objectives for your research group, project, hub or an event
- Identify key stakeholders using stakeholder analysis techniques
- Review communications channels, outputs and activities
- Explore indicators and tools for monitoring and evaluation
- Key questions to consider in a research uptake strategy
Find more: http://resyst.lshtm.ac.uk/resources/resource-bank-research-uptake
ICCH 2011--Agenda-setting in Routine Ambulatory Encounters: Zackary Berger
Ā
Background: Although studies have demonstrated that physicians often fail to elicit the full spectrum of patient concerns, few studies have described the ways in which physicians elicit concerns and the extent to which they set an explicit agenda.
Methods: We performed a qualitative analysis of audio recorded, transcribed routine patient-provider encounters from the Enhancing Communication and HIV Outcomes (ECHO) Study. We developed themes related to whether and how providers elicit patient concerns and then set an agenda for the visit. We developed a coding scheme that we applied to a random selection of 2 encounters per provider (33 providers, 66 encounters total).
Findings: In 41/66 encounters, providers opened the visit with a general question (āHow are you doing?ā). Seven visits opened with a leading question (āEverythingās okay?ā) and 1 with the provider explicitly asking which concerns s/the patient wanted to discuss. Patients more often responded to these opening questions with brief positive statements (āFineā, n=30) than with actual concerns (n=14). In 12 encounters (18%), the provider continued to elicit concerns until the patient stated that s/he had no further concerns (probe to exhaustion). In 30 encounters, there was no agenda statement. When an agenda statement was made, it most often (n=20) centered on physiciansā priorities. Rarely, there was an agenda statement made by the patient (n=3) or one that was collaboratively negotiated (n=3). In 53% of encounters (n=35), patients brought up new concerns later in their visit.
Implications: Providers frequently use generic opening questions that may not be effective in eliciting patientsā concerns, and then do not continue to elicit further concerns. Negotiation of the visit agenda is rare, and new concerns continue to arise later in most encounters. Providers need further training to more effectively invest in the beginning of each encounter.
Word Count 293
KEY WORDS HIV - communication - decision-making preferences
ā
Presentation from Terry Mason on the needs assessment that she conducted for the Massachusetts Department of Public Health regarding sustainable asthma home visiting interventions. (Presented at the annual meeting of the Asthma Regional Council of New England on June 13, 2013 in Shrewsbury, MA)
The four UK HE funding bodies held two events in September 2017 to seek early views from the sector on aspects of a national feedback survey for taught postgraduate students on which we intend to consult formally in early 2018.
AACU 2010: Connecting Assessment Data to Understand Underserved Student Learn...Sukhwant Jhaj
Ā
In this session, facilitators from Portland State Universityās University Studies program will describe the
ways in which they are combining existing assessment methods to identify underserved students, explore
their learning experiences, and inform programs to support student successāall with few additional resources. Specifically, the facilitators will: (a) describe how results from student surveys, university data,
and student portfolio data were combined to create a rich source of information on student learning and the academic experience; (b) share a holistic model of the student experience developed using the
findings; and (c) discuss strategies for sharing the findings that have led to increased collaboration between the general education program and other areas of campus and that have helped inform wider
campus conversations about underserved student success. Participants will discuss the types of assessment data at their institutions that might be combined to create deeper understanding of the student learning experience. They will also consider ways in which assessment findings can be used as leverage to create conversations regarding underserved students and improve their success.
Rowanna L. Carpenter, Assessment Associate and Sukhwant Jhaj, Director, University Studiesāboth
of Portland State University
This presentation features key information about CHI's Preparing for Research by Engaging Public & Patient Partners (PREPPP) Award including eligibility criteria, key dates, and application package information.
This sessionādelivered on March 1, 2024āaims to provide prospective applicants useful information about the Preparing for Research by Engaging Public and Patient Partners (PREPPP) Awards.
Topics include eligibility and assessment criteria, overall quality, and information about the Dr. Wattamon Srisakuldee Memorial PREPPP Award.
Presentation from Terry Mason on the needs assessment that she conducted for the Massachusetts Department of Public Health regarding sustainable asthma home visiting interventions. (Presented at the annual meeting of the Asthma Regional Council of New England on June 13, 2013 in Shrewsbury, MA)
The four UK HE funding bodies held two events in September 2017 to seek early views from the sector on aspects of a national feedback survey for taught postgraduate students on which we intend to consult formally in early 2018.
AACU 2010: Connecting Assessment Data to Understand Underserved Student Learn...Sukhwant Jhaj
Ā
In this session, facilitators from Portland State Universityās University Studies program will describe the
ways in which they are combining existing assessment methods to identify underserved students, explore
their learning experiences, and inform programs to support student successāall with few additional resources. Specifically, the facilitators will: (a) describe how results from student surveys, university data,
and student portfolio data were combined to create a rich source of information on student learning and the academic experience; (b) share a holistic model of the student experience developed using the
findings; and (c) discuss strategies for sharing the findings that have led to increased collaboration between the general education program and other areas of campus and that have helped inform wider
campus conversations about underserved student success. Participants will discuss the types of assessment data at their institutions that might be combined to create deeper understanding of the student learning experience. They will also consider ways in which assessment findings can be used as leverage to create conversations regarding underserved students and improve their success.
Rowanna L. Carpenter, Assessment Associate and Sukhwant Jhaj, Director, University Studiesāboth
of Portland State University
This presentation features key information about CHI's Preparing for Research by Engaging Public & Patient Partners (PREPPP) Award including eligibility criteria, key dates, and application package information.
This sessionādelivered on March 1, 2024āaims to provide prospective applicants useful information about the Preparing for Research by Engaging Public and Patient Partners (PREPPP) Awards.
Topics include eligibility and assessment criteria, overall quality, and information about the Dr. Wattamon Srisakuldee Memorial PREPPP Award.
Organizational Capacity-Building Series - Session 6: Program EvaluationINGENAES
Ā
This session describes different kinds of program evaluations, and key evaluation considerations. These presentations are are part of a workshop series that was implemented in Nepal and 2016 as part of the INGENAES initiative.
Better Healthcare Through Community and Stakeholder Engagement, 2015 Webinar ...Paul Gallant
Ā
"An enjoyable presentation, well-delivered with excellent insight into community and stakeholder engagement strategies. Terry Dyni - July 23, 2015" on the webinar version. This version is my complete slide deck from a live webinar presentation requested by the Conference Board of Canada. April, 2015. Thanks for your interest in Better Healthcare Through Community and Stakeholder Engagement.
Compliments of Paul W. Gallant, CHE, GALLANT HEALTHWORKS & Associates (GHWA), Vancouver, BC, Canada. PS See the last slide for contact details or to arrange customized training/facilitation or advice on your organizational needs.
This session aims to build skills and knowledge in patient engagement and introduce participants to CHI's Methods of Patient & Public Engagement Guide.
Planning the Evaluation
Impact models
Types of inference and choice of design
Defining the indicators and obtaining the data
Carrying out the evaluation
Disseminating evaluation findings
Working in large-scale evaluations
Sills MR. Overview of the SAFTINet Program. Presented to the Emergency Department Research Committee, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine. 6 January 2015.
The failure of researchers to link evidence to policy and practice produces evidence that no one uses, impedes innovation, and leads to mediocre or even detrimental development policies. To help improve the definition, design, and implementation of policy research, researchers should adopt a strategic outcome-oriented approach.
Patient Engagement Presentation - MPN Network Forum April 18, 2017Alexandra Enns
Ā
April 18, 2017
In April we held a Network Forum on engaging policymakers and patients/public effectively and appropriately. We would like to give a warm thanks to both Carolyn Shimmin, Patient Engagement expert of CHI's Knowledge Translation team, and Marcia Thomson, Assistant Deputy Minister of Manitoba Health, Seniors and Active Living for their presentations. Below you can see Carolyn's presentation - to see more of her work on patient engagement and to learn more about knowledge translation at CHI, please check out the blog Knowledge Nudge here. If you would like more information, helpful tools or advice about patient/public engagement in research, please contact Carolyn Shimmin at cshimmin@exchange.hsc.mb.ca
A Health Equity Toolkit: Towards Health Care Solutions For AllWellesley Institute
Ā
This presentation offers health solutions that will help create a more equitable system.
Bob Gardner, Director of Policy
www.wellesleyinstitute.com
Follow us on twitter @wellesleyWI
Grant Proposals (SF 424): K08-K23 Applications and Individual CDAsUCLA CTSI
Ā
UCLA CTSI K Workshop - February 4, 2016
Isidro B. Salusky, MD
Distinguished Professor of Pediatrics at UCLA Chief, Division of Pediatric Nephrology
Director, Clinical Translational Research Center
Associate Dean of Clinical Research
Navigating Conflict in PE Using Strengths-Based ApproachesCHICommunications
Ā
Delivered on May 15, 2024 by the public and patient engagement team from the George & Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation, this presentation discusses the nuances of navigating conflict in patient engagement.
Learning objectives include:
-Understand the importance of using a trauma-informed approach in patient and public engagement
-Develop a strategy to work with patient and public partners in addressing conflict as it arises
-Employ strengths-based approaches to plan for conflict in your own work
Community Engagement of Sexual & Gender Minority PopulationsCHICommunications
Ā
This session, tailored for intermediate learners, offers a deep dive into patient and community engagement in health research, specifically focusing on its pivotal role in driving policy change. Learners will emerge equipped with:
š A comprehensive understanding of the benefits of patient and community engagement in health research.
š The ability to articulate the principles of authentic patient and community engagement.
š A clear definition of intersectionality and practical insights into incorporating its principles into their patient and community engagement strategies.
š An appreciation for the pivotal role of advocacy and the development of public- and stakeholder-facing materials in research programs aimed at influencing health policy.
Why Patient Engagement Matters in Data Science, Engineering and TechnologyCHICommunications
Ā
This presentation, delivered on February 28, 2024, discusses and defines patient-oriented research as it relates to the fields of data science, engineering and technology.
Participants also learned about CHI's annual Preparing for Research by Engaging Patient and Public Partners (PREPPP) award.
chimb.ca
Engaging with First Nations women with experiences of breast cancerCHICommunications
Ā
Objectives
ā¢ To learn about the impact and meaningfulness of storytelling approaches for patient engagement and decolonizing research
ā¢ To understand the importance of using Indigenous research methods, such as storytelling, in health research
ā¢ To critically reflect on engagement approaches for respectful research in Indigenous health research
This presentation by CHI's Public & Patient Engagement Lead Carolyn Shimmin describes the importance of trauma-informed engagement in health research projects.
Book your free consultation at chimb.ca
Presented on Sept. 20, 2023 by Carolyn Shimmin, CHI's Patient and Public Engagement Lead.
This session is meant for beginners. Get familiar with the basics of patient engagement and learn how good engagement can improve your next research project.
Learning Objectives
By the end of this session, attendees should be able to:
- Describe how to plan for engaging children or youth
- Discuss ideas to set your group up for success
- Identify practices to avoid when engaging children and youth
This session is intended for beginner and intermediate level learners (and anyone who might be newer to working with young people as partners and participants). This session is open to anyone who wants to see young people talking about how they want to be engaged in health research or quality improvement work.
Presented on May 10, 2023
Developing a Provincial Patient and Family Advisor NetworkCHICommunications
Ā
Introductory session on the collaborative planning process that Shared Healthās Public, Patient, and Family Engagement Team led, with patient and family advisors and engagement staff from across the province, to develop a provincial network of advisors.
Join us to learn about the collaborative planning process for the Manitoba Provincial Patient and Family Advisor Network, and how engagement staff can access the Network to help recruit advisors for their projects. We will also share what provincial projects we have been working on and what we see for the future.
Objectives:
ā¢ Describe key steps in a collaborative and engaging planning process;
ā¢ Discuss current and future engagement initiatives in Manitoba; and
ā¢ Use the services of the Patient and Family Advisor Network.
Navigating Conflict in PE Using Strengths-Based ApproachesCHICommunications
Ā
Led by CHI's Patient Engagement team, this session is intended to teach users how to deal with and prepare for conflict as it arises in patient engagement.
Patient Engagement for Data Science, Technology & EngineeringCHICommunications
Ā
Learn the necessities and relationship between patient engagement and data science, engineering and technology.
Presented by Trish Roche, CHI's Knowledge Translation Practice Lead, this presentation is geared towards professionals in data science looking to hone their skills in patient engagement.
Tips and Tricks for Establishing a Patient Advisory GroupCHICommunications
Ā
This session is intended for intermediate learners with an understanding of the basic principles of meaningful, safe, and inclusive patient and public engagement.
Following this session, attendees will be able to:
ā¢ Describe key steps in establishing an advisory group for patient and public engagement;
ā¢ Develop a plan for effective advisory group meetings in the first year; and
ā¢ Maintain advisory group activities of the course of a health research or services project.
This intermediate session looks at how physical presence and performance can influence engagement in health research services.
By the end of this session, learners should be able to describe the concept of critical reflexivity, describe the concept of embodied reflexivity, and discuss why bodies matter in patient and public engagement.
Grand Round: RITHIM ā A New Approach to Research in ManitobaCHICommunications
Ā
Research Improvements Through Harmonization in Manitoba (RITHIM) is the next step in streamlining and improving the research process. Together, we can improve the lives of Manitobans.
PE101: Introduction to Patient Engagement in Health ResearchCHICommunications
Ā
Beginner level introduction to the underlying principles and concepts required for meaningful patient and public engagement.
Following this session, attendees should be able to:
Describe theoretical and practical principles of inclusive, authentic, and meaningful engagement of people with lived experience in health research;
Access resources to improve their knowledge of patient and public engagement practices; and
Participate in intermediate level PE Lunchtime Learning sessions.
This case study by PREPPP Award winner Dr. Anna Chudyk and her team discusses experiences, lessons learned, and barriers and facilitators to engaging in health research scoping reviews.
Dr. Dylan MacKay shares his experiences in early engagement in clinical trials.
CHI's Lunchtime Learning is open to all researchers, decision-makers, clinicians, patients and members of the public who want to learn more about the theory and practice of meaningful, inclusive, and safe patient and public engagement.
Learn how to assess internal (research/project team) and external (patient/public partner) readiness to engage in health research.
CHI's Lunchtime Learning is open to all researchers, decision-makers, clinicians, patients and members of the public who want to learn more about the theory and practice of meaningful, inclusive, and safe patient and public engagement.
Following this session, attendees should be able to:
ā¢ Describe the importance of conducting readiness assessments prior to engagement;
ā¢ Describe key concepts for assessing internal and external readiness; and
ā¢ Conduct readiness assessments in planning patient engagement.
Learn about the use of focus and discussion groups to engage and/or collect data with patients, the public, and research participants.
CHI's Lunchtime Learning is open to all researchers, decision-makers, clinicians, patients and members of the public who want to learn more about the theory and practice of meaningful, inclusive, and safe patient and public engagement.
Following this session, attendees should be able to:
- Describe differences between focus groups and discussion groups;
- Determine when each approach is appropriate to use; and
- Assess challenges and needs for planning effective focus and discussion groups.
The Indian economy is classified into different sectors to simplify the analysis and understanding of economic activities. For Class 10, it's essential to grasp the sectors of the Indian economy, understand their characteristics, and recognize their importance. This guide will provide detailed notes on the Sectors of the Indian Economy Class 10, using specific long-tail keywords to enhance comprehension.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
Ā
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
Ā
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
This is a presentation by Dada Robert in a Your Skill Boost masterclass organised by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan (EFSS) on Saturday, the 25th and Sunday, the 26th of May 2024.
He discussed the concept of quality improvement, emphasizing its applicability to various aspects of life, including personal, project, and program improvements. He defined quality as doing the right thing at the right time in the right way to achieve the best possible results and discussed the concept of the "gap" between what we know and what we do, and how this gap represents the areas we need to improve. He explained the scientific approach to quality improvement, which involves systematic performance analysis, testing and learning, and implementing change ideas. He also highlighted the importance of client focus and a team approach to quality improvement.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
4. ā¢ Manitoba researchers, students and community
organizations
ā¢ Planning a health research project or program
ā¢ Aim to involve patients and/or members of the
public in decision-making about research design
ā¢ Research project not yet funded
Who is Eligible?
5. ā¢ Funding for 18 months
ā¢ Free one-hour consult with CHIās PE team
ā¢ Additional fee-based services available
ā¢ Participation in CHIās Patient & Public
Engagement Lunchtime Learning Series
ā¢ Complete a PREPPP evaluation survey
Successful Applicants
6. Main Criteria:
1. Selection of appropriate participatory approaches
2. Feasibility
3. Adaptability & flexibility to input from partners
4. Level of engagement
5. Accessibility, inclusiveness & diversity
Assessing Your Application
7. Sections:
1. Project Information
2. Engagement Activities
3. Patient and Public Partners
4. The Research Team
5. Impact of Engagement
6. Funding Award Budget
7. Optional: Letters of Support
The Application Form
9. ā¢ Research topic incorporates all or most of the
elements of patient-oriented research
ā¢ Topic is driven by needs, values, and experiences
of communities and populations you plan to
engage with
ā¢ Purpose of engagement is clearly stated and
relevant to the research topic
ā¢ Identification of funding agencies or
opportunities you plan to apply to
1. Project Information
10. ā¢ Clear and detailed description of proposed
engagement activities
ā Frequency/duration, number of partners, etc.
ā¢ Level of engagement matches proposed activities
ā¢ Demonstrated flexibility and adaptability, based
on patient and public partner input
ā¢ Plans to address safety and ensure everyone can
contribute meaningfully
ā¢ Potential for continued/ongoing engagement
2. Engagement Activities
11. ā¢ People involved are partners, not participants
ā¢ Planned/completed external assessment of
readiness to engage
ā¢ Demonstrated direct & indirect benefits for
partners (e.g. capacity-building)
ā¢ Explicit consideration of needs, values, and
expectations of patient and public partners
ā¢ Explicit plans for addressing barriers to
engagement
3. Patient and Public Partners
12. ā¢ Demonstrated desire to learn more about
trauma-informed, intersectional approaches to
research and engagement
ā¢ Clearly outlined roles in engagement activities
ā¢ Evidence of commitment to meaningful and
inclusive engagement
ā¢ Internal assessment of readiness to engage,
including barriers and facilitators affecting the
teamās ability to be flexible and adaptable
4. The Research Team
13. ā¢ Clear description of the level of decision-making
power patient and public partners will have
ā Which decisions they will participate in making
ā How engagement methods inform decision-making
ā Who has the final say in research decisions
ā¢ Processes to ensure partnersā concerns,
interests, and values are represented
ā¢ How engagement in early stages will inform
future research and engagement
5. Impact of Engagement
14. ā¢ Focused on supporting meaningful involvement
(compensation, reimbursement, addressing
barriers, meeting people where theyāre at)
ā¢ Preferably using CHIās Budget Builder (Excel
template)
ā¢ Indicates any additional financial or in-kind
supports from other organizations
ā¢ Does not contain inappropriate research-related
expenses (e.g. publications)
6. Funding Award Budget
15. ā¢ Application form & previous winners info:
www.chimb.ca/preppp
ā¢ Resources (Budgeting Tool, PE Methods guide):
www.chimb.ca/resources
ā¢ Previous PE Lunchtime Learning recordings:
http://bit.ly/PELL-Videos
ā¢ KnowledgeNudge PE Blog Series:
http://bit.ly/PE101Blog
Relevant PE Resources
16. ā¢ Shimmin et al. 2017:
ā Trauma-Informed Intersectional Analysis & Critical
Reflexive Questions for teams
ā http://bit.ly/PEinHealthRes
ā¢ Roche et al. 2020:
ā The Valuing All Voices Framework for Meaningful
Patient & Public Engagement
ā http://bit.ly/Valuing-All-Voices
Relevant PE Articles