LO1 Understand how to formulate a research specification Research
formulation: aims and objectives; rationale for selection; methodology for data collection and analysis; literature review; critique of references from primary sources eg questionnaires, interviews; secondary sources eg books, journals, internet; scope and limitations; implications eg resources Hypothesis: definition; suitability; skills and knowledge to be gained; aims and objectives; terms of reference; duration; ethical issues Action plan: rationale for research question or hypothesis; milestones; task dates; review dates; monitoring/reviewing process; strategy Research design: type of research eg qualitative, quantitative, systematic, original; methodology; resources; statistical analyses; validity; reliability; control of variables
Research methods for strategic managersBhavi Bhatia
Thanks to all my readers. It gives boost when I get calls from my readers and am always happy to revert back to my followers and readers. I am sorry if I am unable to reply to all the e-mails due to my busy schedule.
Contact me for any type of assignments help(nominal charges).
Thanks and Regards,
Er. Bhavi Bhatia
e-mail: bhavi.bhatia.411@gmail.com
Phone: +91-9779703714, +91-9814614666
Presentation held at Dundee University on 19 January 2011 for postgraduate students for the purpose of providing guidelines and advice on how to complete their PhD research degrees, successfully.
LO1 Understand how to formulate a research specification Research
formulation: aims and objectives; rationale for selection; methodology for data collection and analysis; literature review; critique of references from primary sources eg questionnaires, interviews; secondary sources eg books, journals, internet; scope and limitations; implications eg resources Hypothesis: definition; suitability; skills and knowledge to be gained; aims and objectives; terms of reference; duration; ethical issues Action plan: rationale for research question or hypothesis; milestones; task dates; review dates; monitoring/reviewing process; strategy Research design: type of research eg qualitative, quantitative, systematic, original; methodology; resources; statistical analyses; validity; reliability; control of variables
Research methods for strategic managersBhavi Bhatia
Thanks to all my readers. It gives boost when I get calls from my readers and am always happy to revert back to my followers and readers. I am sorry if I am unable to reply to all the e-mails due to my busy schedule.
Contact me for any type of assignments help(nominal charges).
Thanks and Regards,
Er. Bhavi Bhatia
e-mail: bhavi.bhatia.411@gmail.com
Phone: +91-9779703714, +91-9814614666
Presentation held at Dundee University on 19 January 2011 for postgraduate students for the purpose of providing guidelines and advice on how to complete their PhD research degrees, successfully.
Evaluation for researchers is an important tool in assessing the merit of public and charitable services that everyone can use, and identifying ways in which those services could be improved.
Dr Helen Kara, an evaluation research specialist, presents the key elements of good practice at each stage of the evaluation process, helping you to better understand your research.
To learn more about evaluation download Helen's eBook: Beginners’ Guide to Evaluation - http://bit.ly/1Kr0vsG
Developing a Workplace Health and Safety Action Plan with NVivoQSR International
See how data was gathered from multiple sources, including consultation sessions, focus groups and a survey. See how the thematic analysis was conducted, including how NVivo features such as auto-coding, word frequency queries, and matrix coding queries were used to inform the analysis.
This is a sample thesis defense external mentor service. I have helped my client in preparing the pre-defense that enables original thinking, making proper points that enable approval from the university to complete the thesis and present at the end of the term
Ph.D. Research Proposal The thesis is focused on researching and constructing an internationally-relevant Learning and Development (L&D) scorecard and conceptual framework, which will enable the transformation of L&D practices into a strategic business partner.
Evaluation for researchers is an important tool in assessing the merit of public and charitable services that everyone can use, and identifying ways in which those services could be improved.
Dr Helen Kara, an evaluation research specialist, presents the key elements of good practice at each stage of the evaluation process, helping you to better understand your research.
To learn more about evaluation download Helen's eBook: Beginners’ Guide to Evaluation - http://bit.ly/1Kr0vsG
Developing a Workplace Health and Safety Action Plan with NVivoQSR International
See how data was gathered from multiple sources, including consultation sessions, focus groups and a survey. See how the thematic analysis was conducted, including how NVivo features such as auto-coding, word frequency queries, and matrix coding queries were used to inform the analysis.
This is a sample thesis defense external mentor service. I have helped my client in preparing the pre-defense that enables original thinking, making proper points that enable approval from the university to complete the thesis and present at the end of the term
Ph.D. Research Proposal The thesis is focused on researching and constructing an internationally-relevant Learning and Development (L&D) scorecard and conceptual framework, which will enable the transformation of L&D practices into a strategic business partner.
32 rcm.org.ukmidwivesTh e latest step-by-step practical g.docxtamicawaysmith
32 rcm.org.uk/midwives
Th e latest step-by-step practical guide...
PRACTICE
32
Write a
research
proposal
HOW TO...
Valerie Finigan
covers all aspects
of what a research
proposal needs to
include and where to
begin when writing it.
Writing a research proposal may be the most challenging part of the research
process – the document must
systematically recommend how
your study will be conducted
(Hollins-Martin and Flemming,
2010). It is the key to gaining ethical
approval, grant application success
and academic qualifi cation.
Yet the question is often asked:
‘What will a research proposal
contain and what should it look like?’
First of all, it is important that you
are passionate about the research
topic, have a vested interest in it, and
that it will add to the profession’s
body of scientifi c knowledge.
Discuss your idea with an
experienced researcher too, prior
to starting your proposal.
Th e proposals must be succinctly
written and clearly chronicle facts,
it must craft a convincing line of
reasoning and an argument for study
approval (Marshall, 2012).
Ask the questions:
1. What is the research about?
2. Why is it important?
3. What is the process that will be
taken to accomplish project goals
and objectives?
4. What will the project cost?
5. Who is the best person to conduct
this study? (Marshall, 2012).
Simple steps to follow:
1 Read the criteria for your proposal
If a format for writing is
given, use it. Check grammar, word
count and remember format and
brevity are important (12-point font,
legible and with a generous margin
will make the proposal easier to
read and comment on) to keep the
reviewer more engaged. Find a peer
or colleague to proofread the proposal
before submission, they may fi nd a
fl aw that you have overlooked. Submit
on time, or the work may be declined.
2 Underpin the study with a
research question
Th is enables you to choose the title
and design for your project and
identify the appropriate methodology
to answer the question of interest.
While the idea of the subject may be
in your mind, the question must be
focused and manageable to enable you
a purposeful and planned approach.
Th e title you choose for the
study should be used consistently
throughout all regulatory documents
(ethical approval consideration,
proposal and any grant applications).
Th e title needs to draw the attention
of the reviewer, so make it succinct
and exciting.
3 The abstractA brief description of your
research proposal, the
abstract should be a summary of the
entire project. It includes a statement
of the purpose of your research and
a brief description of its study design
and methodology.
4 Introduction sectionWithin the introduction
you should include some
background information about your
topic that is appropriate and to the
point. Here you convey the main
032-033_MID_summer OPINION_Practice_How_to v2.indd 32032-033_MID_summer OPINION_Practic ...
1 HOW TO LAY OUT A RESEARCH PROPOSAL Title Page .docxoswald1horne84988
1
HOW TO LAY OUT A RESEARCH PROPOSAL
Title Page:
Title
Name of student and student number
Name of Supervisor
Course
University
Date of submission
Table of Contents
List of appendices
Acknowledgements
Abstract (100 - 150 words)
The abstract must communicate the essential parts of the research proposal and should follow the same
order as the proposal. It must convince the reader that the study is interesting and important
Chapter 1: Literature review (2100 words)
This section should include an Introduction and short justification for the proposed research study. The
literature review must show evidence of wide reading and analysis, synthesis and evaluation of research
findings
Chapter 2: Methodology (3300 words)
Design
Design refers to how your research study will be conducted and the reasons for your choice of study
methodology. You must label the methodology that you will employ e.g. quantitative – correlational or
qualitative – phenomenological. This methodology must be justified from the research literature. Enough
detail must be presented so that the reader can determine the adequacy of the methods. However, it is
important to remember that your proposal is not a theory paper on research methods. Your proposed
study must be central to the discussion with the research literature offering support to your proposed
choice.
Population / Sample
You will need to provide details of your choice of sampling technique and sample size, as well as details
about the participants (i.e. age, gender, religion, medical conditions, employed, etc). Inclusion and
exclusion criteria must be stated along with the rationale for these decisions.
Methods of data collection
Any materials used in the study should be described in sufficient detail. This must also indicate how the
data will be collected and where possible offer samples of the data tools as an appendix (i.e.
questionnaires, interview schedules, and participant consent letters). Information on how, where and
when the data is to be collected must be given.
Robustness of data collection methods
2
You will need to identify the issues regarding the reliability and validity of any measurement tools to be
employed. Similarly, for those undertaking a qualitative study identify the robustness of the study
(consistency, truthfulness and transferability).
Data analysis
Discuss the methods of analysis. If quantitative data is to be collected and analysed you must indicate the
specific statistical tests to be utilised and the statistical package that will be used (i.e. SPSS Version 11).
If qualitative, you must provide clear guidelines as to how the data will be analysed, identifying the model
of analysis that you will utilise (This section must also address the issue of data management, data
protection, etc.
Pilot study
Explain the purpose of a pilot study and give details of your proposed .
· Assignment List
· Week 7 - Philosophical Essay
Week 7 - Philosophical Essay
DUE: Mar 22, 2020 11:55 PM
Grade Details
Grade
N/A
Gradebook Comments
None
Assignment Details
Open Date
Feb 3, 2020 12:05 AM
Graded?
Yes
Points Possible
100.0
Resubmissions Allowed?
No
Attachments checked for originality?
Yes
Top of Form
Assignment Instructions
Objective: Students will write a Philosophical Essay for week 7 based on the course concepts.
Course Objectives: 2, 3, & 4
Task:
This 4 - 5 full page (not to exceed 6 pages) Philosophical Essay you will be writing due Week 7 is designed to be a thoughtful, reflective work. The 4 - 5 full pages does not include a cover page or a works cited page. It will be your premier writing assignment focused on the integration and assessment relating to the course concepts. Your paper should be written based on the outline you submitted during week 4 combined with your additional thoughts and instructor feedback. You will use at least three scholarly/reliable resources with matching in-text citations and a Works Cited page. All essays are double spaced, 12 New Times Roman font, paper title, along with all paragraphs indented five spaces.
Details:
You will pick one of the following topics only to do your paper on:
· According to Socrates, must one heed popular opinion about moral matters? Does Socrates accept the fairness of the laws under which he was tried and convicted? Would Socrates have been wrong to escape?
· Consider the following philosophical puzzle: “If a tree falls in the forest and there's no one around to hear it, does it make a sound?” (1) How is this philosophical puzzle an epistemological problem? And (2) how would John Locke answer it?
· Evaluate the movie, The Matrix, in terms of the philosophical issues raised with (1) skepticism and (2) the mind-body problem. Explain how the movie raises questions similar to those found in Plato’s and Descartes’ philosophy. Do not give a plot summary of the movie – focus on the philosophical issues raised in the movie as they relate to Plato and Descartes.
· Socrates asks Euthyphro, “Are morally good acts willed by God because they are morally good, or are they morally good because they are willed by God?” (1) How does this question relate to the Divine Command Theory of morality? (2) What are the philosophical implications associated with each option here?
· Explain (1) the process by which Descartes uses skepticism to refute skepticism, and (2) what first principle does this lead him to? (3) Explain why this project was important for Descartes to accomplish.
Your paper will be written at a college level with an introduction, body paragraphs, a conclusion, along with in-text citations/Works Cited page in MLA formatting. Students will follow MLA format as the sole citation and formatting style used in written assignments submitted as part of coursework to the Humanities Department. Remember - any resource that is listed on the Works Cited page must .
· Assignment List
· Week 7 - Philosophical Essay
Week 7 - Philosophical Essay
DUE: Mar 22, 2020 11:55 PM
Grade Details
Grade
N/A
Gradebook Comments
None
Assignment Details
Open Date
Feb 3, 2020 12:05 AM
Graded?
Yes
Points Possible
100.0
Resubmissions Allowed?
No
Attachments checked for originality?
Yes
Top of Form
Assignment Instructions
Objective: Students will write a Philosophical Essay for week 7 based on the course concepts.
Course Objectives: 2, 3, & 4
Task:
This 4 - 5 full page (not to exceed 6 pages) Philosophical Essay you will be writing due Week 7 is designed to be a thoughtful, reflective work. The 4 - 5 full pages does not include a cover page or a works cited page. It will be your premier writing assignment focused on the integration and assessment relating to the course concepts. Your paper should be written based on the outline you submitted during week 4 combined with your additional thoughts and instructor feedback. You will use at least three scholarly/reliable resources with matching in-text citations and a Works Cited page. All essays are double spaced, 12 New Times Roman font, paper title, along with all paragraphs indented five spaces.
Details:
You will pick one of the following topics only to do your paper on:
· According to Socrates, must one heed popular opinion about moral matters? Does Socrates accept the fairness of the laws under which he was tried and convicted? Would Socrates have been wrong to escape?
· Consider the following philosophical puzzle: “If a tree falls in the forest and there's no one around to hear it, does it make a sound?” (1) How is this philosophical puzzle an epistemological problem? And (2) how would John Locke answer it?
· Evaluate the movie, The Matrix, in terms of the philosophical issues raised with (1) skepticism and (2) the mind-body problem. Explain how the movie raises questions similar to those found in Plato’s and Descartes’ philosophy. Do not give a plot summary of the movie – focus on the philosophical issues raised in the movie as they relate to Plato and Descartes.
· Socrates asks Euthyphro, “Are morally good acts willed by God because they are morally good, or are they morally good because they are willed by God?” (1) How does this question relate to the Divine Command Theory of morality? (2) What are the philosophical implications associated with each option here?
· Explain (1) the process by which Descartes uses skepticism to refute skepticism, and (2) what first principle does this lead him to? (3) Explain why this project was important for Descartes to accomplish.
Your paper will be written at a college level with an introduction, body paragraphs, a conclusion, along with in-text citations/Works Cited page in MLA formatting. Students will follow MLA format as the sole citation and formatting style used in written assignments submitted as part of coursework to the Humanities Department. Remember - any resource that is listed on the Works Cited page must ...
1. Management Report Assessment Sheet 2010
Student Name: Nikolina Taylor
Title of Management Report: Recording Disciplinary and Grievance in ESR
Date: 22.06.2010
No Criteria Presented Mark Achieved
1 Identification of and approach to the problem or task with
clearly defined objectives. D M P R
√ M
2 Sources of reference and underpinning data.
D M P R
√ M
3 Information collection and analysis.
D M P R
√ D
4 Conclusion or final outcome.
D M P R
√ M
5 Recommendations.
D M P R
√ D
Overall Management Report Assignment Grade: MERIT
Assessors Comments:
• Clearly addresses the problem and demonstrates ability to understand contextual issues and
the implications of change. A justification of using alternative investigation methods, if the
research was undertaken again was considered i.e.; using a focus group and/or conducting a
telephone survey. The appropriateness of using a pilot scheme, questionnaire layout and the
difficulties that can be experienced with question comprehension could have been considered
more.
• Primary data collection was mainly through questionnaires and one-to-one interviews. 28
questionnaires were distributed to all members of staff in the Workforce Information,
Recruitment, Operational HR and Learning and Development Teams. 18 were completed and
returned, giving a response rate of 64%.
• Secondary research consisted of reviewing the disciplinary and grievance procedures;
various HR textbooks; current CIPD Factsheets: Diversity (Feb 2010) and Discipline and
Grievance at Work (April 2010); CIPD People Management Articles ‘How to Avoid
Uncertainties in the ACAS code’ (March 2010) and various websites were utilised. All
research sources were shown in a good bibliography and reference list.
• An excellent analysis given on primary data sources, shown in the findings section. Most
results from the questionnaire were graphically represented, which enabled you to visually
highlight certain points. One-to-one interviews were also summarised in this section.
Secondary data analysis was reasonably well investigated and clearly identified issues
surrounding disciplinary and grievance in previously published material and in your own
organisation.
• The conclusions were developed logically from the information obtained and addresses most
of the key issues.
• The research undertaken, enabled some good recommendations to be made surrounding
disciplinary and grievance issues within your organisation. The recommendations are
practical and logically developed, that consider implication of implementation i.e.: time and
financial issues were considered. Potential difficulties and there resolution could have been
identified and developed.
Appendices incorporated relevant documentation, which showed that research had been
undertaken. The information included was linked well with the main body of the text. Good
bibliography incorporated but remember: it is a numbered list, in alphabetically order according
to authors SURNAME. The references used were linked in well with the reference list. Overall a
good management report, which was well executed and presented. Well Done.
Assessors Signature: Date: 28.06.2010
Internal Verifiers Comments: