SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Prenatal screening
of Down‘s syndrom
in the first and the
second trimester of
pregnancy
pregnancy
Drahomira Springer
ULBLD and 1.LF UK
Praha
Aim of maternal-foetal care
the uncomplicated birth of a healthy baby
to a healthy mother at term
Paulus Orosius, Histoire du monde, 1460 ?
Screening tests in pregnancy
Risk for mother and foetus
- curable
– gestational diabetes
– infection (HIV, hepatitis and syphilis)
– rhesus incompatibility
– rhesus incompatibility
– thyroid dysfunction
Screening of congenital development defects
Screening of DS and NTD in the 2nd trimester
• hCG, AFP, uE3, inhibin
Screening of DS in the 1st trimester
• Free β hCG, PAPP-A
• Nuchal translucency – NT, other US markers
1866 : First description of Down Syndrom (John Langdon
Down)
 1930 - Down syndrome – maternal age association
 1966 : First karyotype on amniotic cells culture
 1974 : First foetal ultrasound scan in France
 1980 - 2nd trimester AFP (with maternal age)
Prenatal screening history
 1980 - 2nd trimester AFP (with maternal age)
– 2nd trimester Multiple markers (double, triple, quad)
 1990 - 1st trimester nuchal translucency (NT)
– 1st trimester NT + PAPP-A + free βhCG
 2000 -Integrated 1st and 2nd trimester
– Sequential 1st and 2nd trimester
 2012 - Foetal nucleic acids in maternal plasma?
Jacob Canick, PhD, Brown University, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
Prenatal screening in the Czech
Republic
 In 80. started investigation with AFP in
combination with age – for women over 35 was
automatically offered AMC
 In 90. was prenatal testing in the second
 In 90. was prenatal testing in the second
trimester obligatory for all pregnant women
 After 2000 started first trimester screening and
the care shifted from biochemistry to
gynaecology
 More than 95% women with prenatal diagnosed
DS choose termination of pregnancy
– Down’s syndrome (DS) is
a congenital disorder,
caused by a trisomy of
chromosome 21
Down’s Syndrome
– First described 1866
JLH Down
– ~1 in 900 births in Czech
Republic
– risk increases with the
mother’s age
Downs Syndrome - Trisomy 21
 Clinical Features
– Average life expectancy 30 years
– Characteristic phenotype
– Learning disability (IQ 20-60)
– Developmental delay / Hypotonia
– Developmental delay / Hypotonia
– Delayed puberty / Early menopause
 Major Causes of Morbidity  Mortality
– 96% portal tract anomalies / Duodenal atresia
– 50% congenital cardiac lesions
– 60% Pre-senile dementia
– majority of babies (95%) are born to
women under 35 years of age
– majority of DS babies (80%) are born to
Incidence of Down’s Syndrome
– majority of DS babies (80%) are born to
women under 35 years of age
– need mass screening programme for low-
risk group
Testing for Downs Syndrome
–no screening test capable of detecting
parental predisposition for a Down’s
syndrome birth
–earlier methods used direct foetal testing,
by invasive tests (e.g.amniocentesis)
by invasive tests (e.g.amniocentesis)
–amniocentesis not suitable for mass
screening programmes
–amniocentesis can cause foetal abort
Maternal age at
birth
Risk of Down’s
syndrome
24 1 in 950
30 1 in 680
Down’s Syndrome and maternal age
30 1 in 680
36 1 in 210
42 1 in 40
Age Distribution of Risk
0
200
400
Maternal Age
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
1:Risk
Aim of Antenatal Screening
for Down’s Syndrome
To identify a group of women at sufficiently
high risk of having an affected child to
justify the offer of a diagnostic test
justify the offer of a diagnostic test
(chorionic villus sampling or
amniocentesis).
– indirect foetal testing, by biochemical maternal
serum screening
– maternal serum screening does not detect specific
marker
Testing for Downs Syndrome
marker
– multiple biochemical markers used to calculate
risk
– software packages available to calculate risk
– can screen in first or second trimester
Second trimester risk factors
− maternal age
− serum AFP
− serum total hCG
− unconjugated oestriol (uE3)
Scheme of distribution positivity
in 2nd trimester
Positivity of DS
Positivity of NTD
Truly affected
pregnancy
Negative results
of screening
Medians for biochemical markers
40
hCG
Decreasing levels
of hCG
Increasing levels
uE3
A
FP
15 16 17 18
týdnygestace
Increasing levels
of AFP and uE3
Pregnancy with
DS are delated
– high hCG
– low AFP and uE3
MoM (multiple of median)
– result reported strictly as multiple of median
MoM’s vary with gestational age
MoM’s vary with assay method
MoM’s vary with population tested
May need adjustment for:
– weight
– ethnic group
– other conditions e.g. diabetes
– twin pregnancies
Maternal serum Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)
– Glycoprotein of foetal origin.
– Synthesized initially in embryonic yolk sac  then by
foetal liver
– Maternal serum concentration maximal at 30 weeks
gestation
gestation
– Maternal serum AFP is lower in DS pregnancies
– Geometric mean MoM is 0.74
– also useful marker of neural tube defects (NTD)
– Maternal serum AFP is elevated in NTD
pregnancies
AFP Distribution curves
100
70
80
90
Down's
syndrome
Unaffected
Maternal Serum AFP MoM
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Serum human chorionic
gonadotrophin (hCG)
– Dimeric glycoprotein hormone (α  ß subunits) secreted by
the fertilised ovum and later by placental tissue.
– Primary function is to maintain the corpus luteum, later
produces Prog  Oest to maintain early pregnancy
– Maternal serum hCG maximal during first trimester, then
declines during second trimester
– Maternal serum hCG is elevated in DS pregnancies
hCG Distribution curves
50
60
70
80
90
100
Down's
Unaffected
0
10
20
30
40
50
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
Maternal Serum hCG MoM
Unconjugated Oestriol (uE3)
− Derived from foetal adrenal DHEAS. Latter hydroxylated in
foetal liver  cleaved by steroid sulphatase in placenta
where the unconjugated fraction converted to uE3
− Low levels uE3 + hCG can detect Edward’s Syndrome
− Low levels uE3 + hCG can detect Edward’s Syndrome
− Low levels seen in maternal serum from Down’s syndrome
− circadian rhythm; levels 15% lower in the morning
− no advantage over double test (AFP/hCG)
Double or triple test?
uE3 – very unstable
interfere of lipaemia
different quality of diagnostics sets
growth of positivity don‘t comport with
growth of positivity don‘t comport with
recovery
long-term comparision showed
irresponsibility results of triple test in our
conditions
Inhibin A
Dimeric inhibin-A (DIA) is a fourth
biochemical marker for Down syndrome
screening,
It is a glycoprotein of placental origin
It is a glycoprotein of placental origin
similar to hCG. Levels in maternal serum
remain relatively constant through the
15th-18th weeks of pregnancy.
Maternal serum levels of DIA are twice as
high in pregnancies affected by Down
syndrome as in unaffected pregnancies.
Importance of gestational dating
– exact gestational dating is essential to calculate risk of DS
– measured value standardised against expected median value
for a normal population at same stage of gestation
– DS foetuses are relatively retarded compared to normal
– DS foetuses are relatively retarded compared to normal
– results in alteration of maternal serum concentration of foetal
products e.g AFP, hCG
– serum concentrations related to gestational age
Complex Data Required
Accurate measure of gestational age - US
Accurate demographic details
– maternal age
– maternal age
– specimen date
– details of other conditions
– foetal numbers
Sophisticated software essential
NTD
– NTD (Neural tube defects) can affect 1in 500
infants
– Commonest forms of NTD known as anencephaly
or spina bifida
– Neural tube beneath the backbone fails to develop
– definitive diagnosis relies on amniocentesis
– high levels of AFP (Alphafetoprotein) seen in NTD
– Amniocentesis is costly and time-consuming
– miscarriage rate of 1:100
Gynaecologist
15. -16. wk
laboratory
Scheme of 2nd trimester screening
Screening centrum
Geneticist
Calculation of risk
and genetics control
Positive
results
First Trimester Screening
 Determining the overall risk of Down’s syndrome in
the unborn.
 First Trimester Screening determines how specific
quantities of Free β HCG and PAPP-A in one
quantities of Free β HCG and PAPP-A in one
specimen compare to the mediums of a population
database.
 Measured at 10-13 completed weeks (70-97 days)
 Calculation of the Multiple of Median (MoM).
Biochemical Markers –
1st Trimester
Pregnancy Associated Plasma Protein A
(PAPP A)
Free ßhCG
Used with the ultrasound marker - Nuchal
Used with the ultrasound marker - Nuchal
Translucency (NT)
Gold Standard test for Trisomy is
karyotyping of foetal cells
PAPP
PAPP-
-A and Free
A and Free β
β
β
β
β
β
β
β-
-hCG
hCG
On average, baby with trisomy 21 will have 2.0 MoM for β
β
β
β-hCG and 0.4 MoM PAPP-A
Free β
β
β
β hCG
− Free β chain of Human Chorionic Gonadotropin.
Very high in the early stages of the first
trimester, declines in the late first trimester
− Free ßhCG higher in Down’s Pregnancies
− Free ßhCG higher in Down’s Pregnancies
during 1st trimester screening period.
− free β hCG is not stable in blood samples. This
is a serious disadvantage, as blood samples
sent to screening centres may be unseparated
for 24 hours or more
Free Beta-hCG
A
B
C
D
Total HCG D
A
B
C
D
Total HCG
Alpha Subunit
Beta Subunit
Free Beta hCG Assay
Specificity
B
C *
FTB11 Ab
Labelled Ab
B
D
Beta Subunit
Pregnancy Associated Plasma
Protein A (PAPP A)
 PAPP-A - Pregnancy associated Plasma
Protein-A. Placental protein which continues to
increase during the term of the pregnancy
 Homotetrameric glycoprotein synthetized in
 Homotetrameric glycoprotein synthetized in
chorionic villi.
 Specific and potent inhibitor of granulocyte
elastase.
 Serum levels lower in Down’s pregnancies in
1st trimester screening period
Nuchal Translucency (NT)
− Ideally performed between 11  13 weeks (10+2-
14+6 FMF).
− NT thickness is a measure of the amount of fluid
at the back of the foetal neck
at the back of the foetal neck
− 3 measurements to the nearest 0.1 mm are
advised.
− The thickness is higher in Down’s pregnancies
during screening period.
Measuring of NT
(1,5 mm)
Foethus with DS
Foethus with DS
NT (3,4 mm)
NT (3,4 mm)
Foethus with Turner syndrom
NT (10 mm)
NT – influence on result of screening
Age 30 let
NT 1,0 MoM
PAPP-A 0,65 MoM
MS-AFP 0,72 MoM
Age 30 let
NT 1,7 MoM
PAPP-A 0,65 MoM
MS-AFP 0,72 MoM
MS-AFP 0,72 MoM
uE3 0,68 MoM
HCG 1,52 MoM
Inhibin-A 1,49 MoM
1:930 Negative
MS-AFP 0,72 MoM
uE3 0,68 MoM
HCG 1,52 MoM
Inhibin-A 1,49 MoM
1:65 Positive
Risk calculation
Nuchal Translucency (NT) measurement.
Maternal age + NT account for 80% overall
Maternal age + NT account for 80% overall
risk
Maternal age + NT + Biochemistry 88-90%.
RISK ASSESMENT
 MoMs that typically yield a high risk of Down’s are
those where, in combination, the Free β HCG MoM
is  2.5 and the PAPP-A is  0.4
 HIGH RISK- Woman  35 years of age, with a NT of
 2.0 mm, and Free β HCG MoM 2.5 and PAPP-A
 2.0 mm, and Free β HCG MoM 2.5 and PAPP-A
MoM  0.4
 LOW RISK - Women  35 years of age, with a NT of
 2.0 mm, combined with a Free β HCG and PAPP-
A MoM of 1.0.
 Further tests required at an overall risk of 1:150
Advantages of 1st Trimester
Screening
Information earlier, more options
Reduce number of invasive procedures
May identify other severe anomalies (or risk
May identify other severe anomalies (or risk
for) at time of scan and increased risk of
adverse pregnancy outcome—referral for 2nd
trimester
Good time to date pregnancy accurately
NT good for multiple gestation
Gynaecologist
11. – 13. wk US - NT
CRL 45-84mm
10. -12. wk
laboratory
Scheme of 1st trimester screening
Calculation of risk
CVS / AMC
US screening in 20. - 22. wk
Positive
results negative
Diagnostic Tests
 Amniocentesis
– Usually performed between 15  18 weeks.
– Amniotic fluid removed by needle inserted
into uterus transabdominal (located by US).
– foetal cells cultured (cytogenetics lab).
– Molecular biology techniques instead of full
karyotyping.
– Enables detection of other chromosomal abn.
– Risk of miscarriage approx. 1 in 100.
Diagnostic Tests
Chorionic Villus Sampling (CVS)
– Performed around 11 to 13 weeks.
– Chorionic villi sample removed from
developing placenta (trans abdominally
developing placenta (trans abdominally
or trans vaginally under US control).
– Slightly higher miscarriage rate than
amnio.
Screening of congenial
development defects
Currently perform:
– screening of Down syndrom and NTD
in the II.trimester of pregnacy
• hCG
• AFP
• AFP
– screening of DS in the I.trimester
• Free β hCG
• PAPP-A
• Nuchal translucency – NT
• Present of nose bone
– integrated test
Integrated test
1st trimester
 determination of PAPP-A,
optionally free βhCG
2nd trimester
 determination of AFP
and total hCG
 determination of GA by US
 measuring of NT
 first evaluation by
physician
 common evaluation
with I. trimester
results
AMNIO-PCR
 Only a small amount of amniotic fluid is required
 Applicable to a wide range of pregnancies (12 to
34 weeks)
 Definitive results within 24 h
 100% accurate in the detection of major
 100% accurate in the detection of major
autosomal trisomies
• Trisomy 21 (Down syndrom)
• Trisomy 18 (Edwards syndrom)
• Trisomy 13 (Patau syndrom)
• Triploidy
• Sex chromosome aneuploidy
Ethical considerations
Who is the patient?
Who benefits?
Tests far from perfect - 65% detection
Highly stressful - patients and staff
Highly stressful - patients and staff
Stigmatisation of surviving Down’s patients
Can appropriate counselling be provided?
Screening
Ethics
Religion
What will be after diagnosis?
Pregnant women and her family?
Pregnant women and her family?
Gynaecologists and midwifes – agree with abortion?
• The Hippocratic Oath (“primum non nocere”)
• Religion
• Czech Republic – the atheistic country
Conclusions
Down’s Syndrome screening feasible
Technically imperfect
New approaches may help – US, DNA
technology
technology
Current aim is for first trimester screening
Ethical issues cannot be ignored
Informed decision making essential
Information for pregnant
Consultation before
performation of screening
Posibility of consultation
during all pregnancy
during all pregnancy
www pages
Laboratory
communication with
gyneacologists and geneticts
Screening of DS
1st trimester 2nd trimester Integrated
PAPP-A
free β
β
β
β hCG
Nuchal
translucency (NT)
AFP
hCG
uE3
Detection rate
FP for 85% DR DR for 5% FP
I.trimester
combined test
3,8 - 6,8% 85%
II.trimester
9,3 - 14 % 69%
integrated test
0,8 - 1,2% 94%
serum integrated test
2,7 - 5,2% 85%
Prenatal diagnoses of DS
V.Gregor, Genetic, Thomayer Hospital, Prague , Czech Republic
Ratio DS diagnoses in the first and second
trimester
1st trim. 2nd trim.
V.Gregor, Genetic, Thomayer Hospital, Prague , Czech Republic
QUALITY CONTROL
 Quality Control specimens are run daily at all
levels of the working range for all assays
(precision).
 External Quality Control for 2nd trimester is
organized by SEKK or DGKC, for 1st trimester
organized by SEKK or DGKC, for 1st trimester
by UKNEQAS (accuracy). This allows for
comparisons between different methodologies
in different laboratories to be made.
Europe
In
In some
some countries
countries is
is screening
screening defined
defined by
by state
state
health
health care
care
Majority
Majority of
of countries
countries perform
perform AMC
AMC after
after 35.
35.
Majority
Majority of
of countries
countries perform
perform AMC
AMC after
after 35.
35.
France  38
France  38
Finland
Finland  40
 40
International status of abortion law:
Legal on request
llegal with exception for rape, maternal life, health, mental health, foetal defects,
and/or socioeconomic factors
llegal with exception for rape, maternal life, health, mental health, and/or foetal
defects
llegal with exception for rape, maternal life, health, and/or mental health
llegal with exception for maternal life, health, and/or mental health
llegal with no exceptions
Varies by region
No information Wikipedia
Summary
 Despite of increasing participation of US, the
biochemical testing has still major role in Down’s
screening
 Current aim is for first trimester screening but many
practical problems are associated - certification, high
level of cooperation (one-day service)
level of cooperation (one-day service)
 Increased standardization for all participants
 Biochemical testing for NTD is being superseded by
US
 Ethical issues cannot be ignored
 Informed decision making essential
Future in prenatal testing
 1997 First report of free foetal DNA in maternal
circulation. (Lo YMD et al. Lancet 1997;350:485-7)
 Investigations focused on the role of cell-free foetal DNA
and foetal messenger RNA
Placenta Maternal plasma Maternal blood cells
Extraction of cell free foetal nucleic acids
Cell free foetal DNA (3.4%)
Cell free maternal DNA (96.6%)
11 – 17
weeks
Cell free maternal DNA (96.6%)
•Population variation
• Low copy number of cf
foetal DNA
• Background
‘contamination’ with cf
maternal DNA (94 – 97%)
Helen White, PhD. National Genetics, Reference Lab (Wessex)
Development of techniques with improved detection levels
e.g.Pyrophosphorolysis Activated Polymerisation (PAP)
New advances
Real time PCR, mass
spectrometry
(1:106)
Pyrophosphorolysis
Activated Polymerisation
(1:109)
Detection Level
• Theoretical detection level of 10-9 (improvement on RQ-PCR)
• foetal sexing n=54 (Boon et al., Prenatal Diagnosis 2007)
• Sensitivity 100 % (95% CI: 5.56% chance of false negative)
• Specificity 98.1 % (95% CI: 91.5% - 99.9%) [1 false positive]
• Potential for detection of paternal mutations
• Requires high purity blocked oligonucleotides – risk of false positives
spectrometry Activated Polymerisation
(PAP)
Helen White, PhD. National Genetics, Reference Lab (Wessex)
Detection of aneuploidy
The ability to use NIPD to detect foetal aneuploidies, particularly
trisomy 21, represents a major breakthrough in prenatal diagnosis
• Major technical challenge
Background of cf maternal DNA mean direct quantification of foetal
chromosome copy number is not yet feasible
Need targets that are free from maternal background interference
• Recent major breakthroughs
Quantitative analysis of SNPs in foetal specific mRNA transcripts
(Lo et al., PNAS 2007; Lo et al., Nature Medicine 2007; Maron et al, 2007)
Epigenetic analysis (Tong et al., 2006; Old et al, 2007)
Proteomic analysis (e.g. Nagalla et al., 2007) Identification of novel protein
biomarkers in maternal plasma associated with trisomy 21 pregnancies
Helen White, PhD. National Genetics, Reference Lab (Wessex)
Quantitative analysis of SNPs in foetal specific mRNA
• PLAC4 mRNA ( ) is derived exclusively from foetal chromosome 21
• PLAC4 mRNA expressed in the placenta and is found in the plasma of pregnant women
Normal fetus Trisomy 21 fetus
Lo et al., Nature Med  PNAS, 2007
1 : 1 2 : 1
• Correctly diagnosed foetal trisomy 21 in 90% of +21 cases (n=10)
• Excluded diagnosis of trisomy 21 in 96.5% of chromosomally normal controls (n=57)
• Foetus has to be informative for SNP analysed
Hahn S, Lapaire O, Tercanli S, Kolla V,
Hösli I. Expert Rev Mol Med 2011:13:e16
MPS – Implementation
on Ilumina platform
 Sample preparation (cca. 270 USD)
 Cluster preparation (cca. 600 USD)
 sequenator (1500 USD for 1 cell, 7 pac.+QC)
 sequenator (1500 USD for 1 cell, 7 pac.+QC)
 Data analysis, evaluation
 3 working days
 Price of device – 600.000 USD
Summary
DNA Extraction
• Enrichment of cf foetal DNA – will improve reliability of testing
• Any technique that can separate cf maternal and cf foetal DNA would
revolutionise NIPD
Foetal sexing and single gene disorders
• Already in diagnostic use although development of more foetal specific markers
required
• New techniques with increased levels of detection are being reported in research
settings. Requires diagnostic validation
Aneuploidy
• Use of mRNA SNP allele ratio for testing for DS testing has been successfully
applied in research setting. Requires diagnostic validation
• Epigenetic studies ongoing and proteomics studies are promising
Lack of quality control material and method standardisation
Helen White, PhD. National Genetics, Reference Lab (Wessex)
PGD
 PGD – Preimplantation genetic diagnosis
 Combines protocols of IVF and genetic testing
 Handyside and Verlinsky – 1990
 Biopsy of polar bodies of oocytes (less
 Biopsy of polar bodies of oocytes (less
frequenlty)
 Biopsy of embryonal blastomeres (more
frequenlty)
 Sampling – 8 cells embryos i.e. 3. days after
egg fertilization
 Egg must be fertilized by one sperm (ICSI)
Methods of testing
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH)
PCR
Microarray
Diseases that can be
diagnosed
 Aneuploidy (sensitivity 90%)
 Abortion of foetus when one of the parents is
known as a carrier of translocations
 Monogennous diseases (sickle cell anemia, cystic
 Monogennous diseases (sickle cell anemia, cystic
fibrosis, Huntigton’s disease, Tay-Sachs disease
 Carrier translocations
 Maternal Gonosomal mosaicism

 Each test is always disease specific
Děkuji
za pozornost
Literature:
Pandya, P.P. et al (1995) Br J Obstet Gynacol 102: 957-962
Spencer, K. et al (1999) Ultrasound Obstet Gynacol 13: 231-237
Tasevski V, Ward P, Koe L. and Morris J. Feto-Maternal Medicine Laboratory Kolling
Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards, NSW
AUSTRALIA
Dr Rick Jones, Division of Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Dr Rick Jones, Division of Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Allan Thompson: NTD and Down’s Screening, Bayer Diagnostics
Stevenson, Leslie and Sheridan, Ann.Clin.Biochem 30, 99-100 (1993)

More Related Content

What's hot

Sridhar prenatal diagnosis
Sridhar prenatal diagnosisSridhar prenatal diagnosis
Sridhar prenatal diagnosis
Sridhar Mulaka
 
Mayer rokitansky kuster hauser syndrome
Mayer rokitansky kuster hauser syndromeMayer rokitansky kuster hauser syndrome
Mayer rokitansky kuster hauser syndrome
babyanu14
 
Pediatric gynecology
Pediatric gynecologyPediatric gynecology
Pediatric gynecology
raj kumar
 

What's hot (20)

Rh isoimmunization
Rh isoimmunizationRh isoimmunization
Rh isoimmunization
 
Antenatal assesment of featl well being
Antenatal assesment of featl well beingAntenatal assesment of featl well being
Antenatal assesment of featl well being
 
Tubal factor infertility
Tubal factor infertilityTubal factor infertility
Tubal factor infertility
 
Antenatal / prenatal diagnosis of genetic disorders / diseases . Dr. jaleel
Antenatal / prenatal diagnosis of genetic disorders / diseases . Dr. jaleelAntenatal / prenatal diagnosis of genetic disorders / diseases . Dr. jaleel
Antenatal / prenatal diagnosis of genetic disorders / diseases . Dr. jaleel
 
Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis ( PGD )
Pre-implantation  Genetic Diagnosis ( PGD )Pre-implantation  Genetic Diagnosis ( PGD )
Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis ( PGD )
 
Non invasive pregnancy testing
Non invasive pregnancy testingNon invasive pregnancy testing
Non invasive pregnancy testing
 
Sridhar prenatal diagnosis
Sridhar prenatal diagnosisSridhar prenatal diagnosis
Sridhar prenatal diagnosis
 
antenatal fetal surveillance
antenatal fetal surveillanceantenatal fetal surveillance
antenatal fetal surveillance
 
Early pregnancy ultrasonographic evaluation
Early pregnancy ultrasonographic evaluationEarly pregnancy ultrasonographic evaluation
Early pregnancy ultrasonographic evaluation
 
Management of Female infertility
Management of  Female infertilityManagement of  Female infertility
Management of Female infertility
 
TORCH
TORCHTORCH
TORCH
 
Mayer rokitansky kuster hauser syndrome
Mayer rokitansky kuster hauser syndromeMayer rokitansky kuster hauser syndrome
Mayer rokitansky kuster hauser syndrome
 
AMNIOTIC FLUID PPT
AMNIOTIC FLUID PPT AMNIOTIC FLUID PPT
AMNIOTIC FLUID PPT
 
Urine analysis
Urine analysisUrine analysis
Urine analysis
 
Triple maternal screen
Triple maternal screenTriple maternal screen
Triple maternal screen
 
Ultrasonography of the ovary
Ultrasonography of the ovaryUltrasonography of the ovary
Ultrasonography of the ovary
 
Premature Ovarian Failure
Premature Ovarian FailurePremature Ovarian Failure
Premature Ovarian Failure
 
MULLERIAN DUCT ANOMALIES
MULLERIAN DUCT ANOMALIESMULLERIAN DUCT ANOMALIES
MULLERIAN DUCT ANOMALIES
 
Antepartum fetal assessment
Antepartum fetal assessmentAntepartum fetal assessment
Antepartum fetal assessment
 
Pediatric gynecology
Pediatric gynecologyPediatric gynecology
Pediatric gynecology
 

Similar to Prenatal screening in pregnancy -Springer D.pdf

Genetictesting 140305094745-phpapp01
Genetictesting 140305094745-phpapp01Genetictesting 140305094745-phpapp01
Genetictesting 140305094745-phpapp01
t7260678
 
Gyula Richard Nagy: Prenatal diagnostic methods
Gyula Richard Nagy: Prenatal diagnostic methodsGyula Richard Nagy: Prenatal diagnostic methods
Gyula Richard Nagy: Prenatal diagnostic methods
Katalin Cseh
 

Similar to Prenatal screening in pregnancy -Springer D.pdf (20)

screening for down syndrome
screening for down syndromescreening for down syndrome
screening for down syndrome
 
Maternal screening for fetal Aneuploidy- Update on Laboratory Tests
Maternal screening for fetal Aneuploidy- Update on Laboratory TestsMaternal screening for fetal Aneuploidy- Update on Laboratory Tests
Maternal screening for fetal Aneuploidy- Update on Laboratory Tests
 
prenatal genet.pptx
prenatal genet.pptxprenatal genet.pptx
prenatal genet.pptx
 
Genetictesting 140305094745-phpapp01
Genetictesting 140305094745-phpapp01Genetictesting 140305094745-phpapp01
Genetictesting 140305094745-phpapp01
 
Genetic testing
Genetic testingGenetic testing
Genetic testing
 
Prenatal cytogenetic
Prenatal cytogenetic Prenatal cytogenetic
Prenatal cytogenetic
 
From down syndrome screening to nipt
From down syndrome screening to niptFrom down syndrome screening to nipt
From down syndrome screening to nipt
 
Importance of the 11 13 weeks scan
Importance of the 11 13 weeks scanImportance of the 11 13 weeks scan
Importance of the 11 13 weeks scan
 
genetic tests.pptx
genetic tests.pptxgenetic tests.pptx
genetic tests.pptx
 
First trimester screening Down's
First trimester screening Down's First trimester screening Down's
First trimester screening Down's
 
Prenatal diagnosis
Prenatal diagnosis Prenatal diagnosis
Prenatal diagnosis
 
Antenatal monitoring of fetal well being 2
Antenatal monitoring of fetal well being 2Antenatal monitoring of fetal well being 2
Antenatal monitoring of fetal well being 2
 
Fetal therapy
Fetal therapyFetal therapy
Fetal therapy
 
Genetic screening..dr.padmesh
Genetic screening..dr.padmeshGenetic screening..dr.padmesh
Genetic screening..dr.padmesh
 
pregnancy111.ppt
pregnancy111.pptpregnancy111.ppt
pregnancy111.ppt
 
Prenatal diagnosis
Prenatal diagnosisPrenatal diagnosis
Prenatal diagnosis
 
Gyula Richard Nagy: Prenatal diagnostic methods
Gyula Richard Nagy: Prenatal diagnostic methodsGyula Richard Nagy: Prenatal diagnostic methods
Gyula Richard Nagy: Prenatal diagnostic methods
 
PRENATAL_DIAGNOSIS[1].pptx
PRENATAL_DIAGNOSIS[1].pptxPRENATAL_DIAGNOSIS[1].pptx
PRENATAL_DIAGNOSIS[1].pptx
 
4. prenatal dx.pptx
4. prenatal dx.pptx4. prenatal dx.pptx
4. prenatal dx.pptx
 
Maternal serum screening
Maternal serum screeningMaternal serum screening
Maternal serum screening
 

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxSynthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
 
Basic_QTL_Marker-assisted_Selection_Sourabh.ppt
Basic_QTL_Marker-assisted_Selection_Sourabh.pptBasic_QTL_Marker-assisted_Selection_Sourabh.ppt
Basic_QTL_Marker-assisted_Selection_Sourabh.ppt
 
Forest and Wildlife Resources Class 10 Free Study Material PDF
Forest and Wildlife Resources Class 10 Free Study Material PDFForest and Wildlife Resources Class 10 Free Study Material PDF
Forest and Wildlife Resources Class 10 Free Study Material PDF
 
PART A. Introduction to Costumer Service
PART A. Introduction to Costumer ServicePART A. Introduction to Costumer Service
PART A. Introduction to Costumer Service
 
INU_CAPSTONEDESIGN_비밀번호486_업로드용 발표자료.pdf
INU_CAPSTONEDESIGN_비밀번호486_업로드용 발표자료.pdfINU_CAPSTONEDESIGN_비밀번호486_업로드용 발표자료.pdf
INU_CAPSTONEDESIGN_비밀번호486_업로드용 발표자료.pdf
 
Introduction to Quality Improvement Essentials
Introduction to Quality Improvement EssentialsIntroduction to Quality Improvement Essentials
Introduction to Quality Improvement Essentials
 
B.ed spl. HI pdusu exam paper-2023-24.pdf
B.ed spl. HI pdusu exam paper-2023-24.pdfB.ed spl. HI pdusu exam paper-2023-24.pdf
B.ed spl. HI pdusu exam paper-2023-24.pdf
 
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdfHome assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
 
Basic Civil Engg Notes_Chapter-6_Environment Pollution & Engineering
Basic Civil Engg Notes_Chapter-6_Environment Pollution & EngineeringBasic Civil Engg Notes_Chapter-6_Environment Pollution & Engineering
Basic Civil Engg Notes_Chapter-6_Environment Pollution & Engineering
 
Salient features of Environment protection Act 1986.pptx
Salient features of Environment protection Act 1986.pptxSalient features of Environment protection Act 1986.pptx
Salient features of Environment protection Act 1986.pptx
 
NCERT Solutions Power Sharing Class 10 Notes pdf
NCERT Solutions Power Sharing Class 10 Notes pdfNCERT Solutions Power Sharing Class 10 Notes pdf
NCERT Solutions Power Sharing Class 10 Notes pdf
 
UNIT – IV_PCI Complaints: Complaints and evaluation of complaints, Handling o...
UNIT – IV_PCI Complaints: Complaints and evaluation of complaints, Handling o...UNIT – IV_PCI Complaints: Complaints and evaluation of complaints, Handling o...
UNIT – IV_PCI Complaints: Complaints and evaluation of complaints, Handling o...
 
Operations Management - Book1.p - Dr. Abdulfatah A. Salem
Operations Management - Book1.p  - Dr. Abdulfatah A. SalemOperations Management - Book1.p  - Dr. Abdulfatah A. Salem
Operations Management - Book1.p - Dr. Abdulfatah A. Salem
 
Fish and Chips - have they had their chips
Fish and Chips - have they had their chipsFish and Chips - have they had their chips
Fish and Chips - have they had their chips
 
2024_Student Session 2_ Set Plan Preparation.pptx
2024_Student Session 2_ Set Plan Preparation.pptx2024_Student Session 2_ Set Plan Preparation.pptx
2024_Student Session 2_ Set Plan Preparation.pptx
 
How to Create Map Views in the Odoo 17 ERP
How to Create Map Views in the Odoo 17 ERPHow to Create Map Views in the Odoo 17 ERP
How to Create Map Views in the Odoo 17 ERP
 
How to Break the cycle of negative Thoughts
How to Break the cycle of negative ThoughtsHow to Break the cycle of negative Thoughts
How to Break the cycle of negative Thoughts
 
How to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS Module
How to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS ModuleHow to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS Module
How to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS Module
 
Ethnobotany and Ethnopharmacology ......
Ethnobotany and Ethnopharmacology ......Ethnobotany and Ethnopharmacology ......
Ethnobotany and Ethnopharmacology ......
 
GIÁO ÁN DẠY THÊM (KẾ HOẠCH BÀI BUỔI 2) - TIẾNG ANH 8 GLOBAL SUCCESS (2 CỘT) N...
GIÁO ÁN DẠY THÊM (KẾ HOẠCH BÀI BUỔI 2) - TIẾNG ANH 8 GLOBAL SUCCESS (2 CỘT) N...GIÁO ÁN DẠY THÊM (KẾ HOẠCH BÀI BUỔI 2) - TIẾNG ANH 8 GLOBAL SUCCESS (2 CỘT) N...
GIÁO ÁN DẠY THÊM (KẾ HOẠCH BÀI BUỔI 2) - TIẾNG ANH 8 GLOBAL SUCCESS (2 CỘT) N...
 

Prenatal screening in pregnancy -Springer D.pdf

  • 1. Prenatal screening of Down‘s syndrom in the first and the second trimester of pregnancy pregnancy Drahomira Springer ULBLD and 1.LF UK Praha
  • 2. Aim of maternal-foetal care the uncomplicated birth of a healthy baby to a healthy mother at term Paulus Orosius, Histoire du monde, 1460 ?
  • 3. Screening tests in pregnancy Risk for mother and foetus - curable – gestational diabetes – infection (HIV, hepatitis and syphilis) – rhesus incompatibility – rhesus incompatibility – thyroid dysfunction Screening of congenital development defects Screening of DS and NTD in the 2nd trimester • hCG, AFP, uE3, inhibin Screening of DS in the 1st trimester • Free β hCG, PAPP-A • Nuchal translucency – NT, other US markers
  • 4. 1866 : First description of Down Syndrom (John Langdon Down) 1930 - Down syndrome – maternal age association 1966 : First karyotype on amniotic cells culture 1974 : First foetal ultrasound scan in France 1980 - 2nd trimester AFP (with maternal age) Prenatal screening history 1980 - 2nd trimester AFP (with maternal age) – 2nd trimester Multiple markers (double, triple, quad) 1990 - 1st trimester nuchal translucency (NT) – 1st trimester NT + PAPP-A + free βhCG 2000 -Integrated 1st and 2nd trimester – Sequential 1st and 2nd trimester 2012 - Foetal nucleic acids in maternal plasma? Jacob Canick, PhD, Brown University, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
  • 5. Prenatal screening in the Czech Republic In 80. started investigation with AFP in combination with age – for women over 35 was automatically offered AMC In 90. was prenatal testing in the second In 90. was prenatal testing in the second trimester obligatory for all pregnant women After 2000 started first trimester screening and the care shifted from biochemistry to gynaecology More than 95% women with prenatal diagnosed DS choose termination of pregnancy
  • 6. – Down’s syndrome (DS) is a congenital disorder, caused by a trisomy of chromosome 21 Down’s Syndrome – First described 1866 JLH Down – ~1 in 900 births in Czech Republic – risk increases with the mother’s age
  • 7. Downs Syndrome - Trisomy 21 Clinical Features – Average life expectancy 30 years – Characteristic phenotype – Learning disability (IQ 20-60) – Developmental delay / Hypotonia – Developmental delay / Hypotonia – Delayed puberty / Early menopause Major Causes of Morbidity Mortality – 96% portal tract anomalies / Duodenal atresia – 50% congenital cardiac lesions – 60% Pre-senile dementia
  • 8. – majority of babies (95%) are born to women under 35 years of age – majority of DS babies (80%) are born to Incidence of Down’s Syndrome – majority of DS babies (80%) are born to women under 35 years of age – need mass screening programme for low- risk group
  • 9. Testing for Downs Syndrome –no screening test capable of detecting parental predisposition for a Down’s syndrome birth –earlier methods used direct foetal testing, by invasive tests (e.g.amniocentesis) by invasive tests (e.g.amniocentesis) –amniocentesis not suitable for mass screening programmes –amniocentesis can cause foetal abort
  • 10. Maternal age at birth Risk of Down’s syndrome 24 1 in 950 30 1 in 680 Down’s Syndrome and maternal age 30 1 in 680 36 1 in 210 42 1 in 40
  • 11. Age Distribution of Risk 0 200 400 Maternal Age 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 1:Risk
  • 12. Aim of Antenatal Screening for Down’s Syndrome To identify a group of women at sufficiently high risk of having an affected child to justify the offer of a diagnostic test justify the offer of a diagnostic test (chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis).
  • 13. – indirect foetal testing, by biochemical maternal serum screening – maternal serum screening does not detect specific marker Testing for Downs Syndrome marker – multiple biochemical markers used to calculate risk – software packages available to calculate risk – can screen in first or second trimester
  • 14. Second trimester risk factors − maternal age − serum AFP − serum total hCG − unconjugated oestriol (uE3)
  • 15. Scheme of distribution positivity in 2nd trimester Positivity of DS Positivity of NTD Truly affected pregnancy Negative results of screening
  • 16. Medians for biochemical markers 40 hCG Decreasing levels of hCG Increasing levels uE3 A FP 15 16 17 18 týdnygestace Increasing levels of AFP and uE3 Pregnancy with DS are delated – high hCG – low AFP and uE3
  • 17. MoM (multiple of median) – result reported strictly as multiple of median MoM’s vary with gestational age MoM’s vary with assay method MoM’s vary with population tested May need adjustment for: – weight – ethnic group – other conditions e.g. diabetes – twin pregnancies
  • 18. Maternal serum Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) – Glycoprotein of foetal origin. – Synthesized initially in embryonic yolk sac then by foetal liver – Maternal serum concentration maximal at 30 weeks gestation gestation – Maternal serum AFP is lower in DS pregnancies – Geometric mean MoM is 0.74 – also useful marker of neural tube defects (NTD) – Maternal serum AFP is elevated in NTD pregnancies
  • 19. AFP Distribution curves 100 70 80 90 Down's syndrome Unaffected Maternal Serum AFP MoM 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
  • 20. Serum human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) – Dimeric glycoprotein hormone (α ß subunits) secreted by the fertilised ovum and later by placental tissue. – Primary function is to maintain the corpus luteum, later produces Prog Oest to maintain early pregnancy – Maternal serum hCG maximal during first trimester, then declines during second trimester – Maternal serum hCG is elevated in DS pregnancies
  • 21. hCG Distribution curves 50 60 70 80 90 100 Down's Unaffected 0 10 20 30 40 50 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 Maternal Serum hCG MoM
  • 22. Unconjugated Oestriol (uE3) − Derived from foetal adrenal DHEAS. Latter hydroxylated in foetal liver cleaved by steroid sulphatase in placenta where the unconjugated fraction converted to uE3 − Low levels uE3 + hCG can detect Edward’s Syndrome − Low levels uE3 + hCG can detect Edward’s Syndrome − Low levels seen in maternal serum from Down’s syndrome − circadian rhythm; levels 15% lower in the morning − no advantage over double test (AFP/hCG)
  • 23. Double or triple test? uE3 – very unstable interfere of lipaemia different quality of diagnostics sets growth of positivity don‘t comport with growth of positivity don‘t comport with recovery long-term comparision showed irresponsibility results of triple test in our conditions
  • 24. Inhibin A Dimeric inhibin-A (DIA) is a fourth biochemical marker for Down syndrome screening, It is a glycoprotein of placental origin It is a glycoprotein of placental origin similar to hCG. Levels in maternal serum remain relatively constant through the 15th-18th weeks of pregnancy. Maternal serum levels of DIA are twice as high in pregnancies affected by Down syndrome as in unaffected pregnancies.
  • 25. Importance of gestational dating – exact gestational dating is essential to calculate risk of DS – measured value standardised against expected median value for a normal population at same stage of gestation – DS foetuses are relatively retarded compared to normal – DS foetuses are relatively retarded compared to normal – results in alteration of maternal serum concentration of foetal products e.g AFP, hCG – serum concentrations related to gestational age
  • 26. Complex Data Required Accurate measure of gestational age - US Accurate demographic details – maternal age – maternal age – specimen date – details of other conditions – foetal numbers Sophisticated software essential
  • 27. NTD – NTD (Neural tube defects) can affect 1in 500 infants – Commonest forms of NTD known as anencephaly or spina bifida – Neural tube beneath the backbone fails to develop – definitive diagnosis relies on amniocentesis – high levels of AFP (Alphafetoprotein) seen in NTD – Amniocentesis is costly and time-consuming – miscarriage rate of 1:100
  • 28. Gynaecologist 15. -16. wk laboratory Scheme of 2nd trimester screening Screening centrum Geneticist Calculation of risk and genetics control Positive results
  • 29. First Trimester Screening Determining the overall risk of Down’s syndrome in the unborn. First Trimester Screening determines how specific quantities of Free β HCG and PAPP-A in one quantities of Free β HCG and PAPP-A in one specimen compare to the mediums of a population database. Measured at 10-13 completed weeks (70-97 days) Calculation of the Multiple of Median (MoM).
  • 30. Biochemical Markers – 1st Trimester Pregnancy Associated Plasma Protein A (PAPP A) Free ßhCG Used with the ultrasound marker - Nuchal Used with the ultrasound marker - Nuchal Translucency (NT) Gold Standard test for Trisomy is karyotyping of foetal cells
  • 31. PAPP PAPP- -A and Free A and Free β β β β β β β β- -hCG hCG On average, baby with trisomy 21 will have 2.0 MoM for β β β β-hCG and 0.4 MoM PAPP-A
  • 32. Free β β β β hCG − Free β chain of Human Chorionic Gonadotropin. Very high in the early stages of the first trimester, declines in the late first trimester − Free ßhCG higher in Down’s Pregnancies − Free ßhCG higher in Down’s Pregnancies during 1st trimester screening period. − free β hCG is not stable in blood samples. This is a serious disadvantage, as blood samples sent to screening centres may be unseparated for 24 hours or more
  • 33. Free Beta-hCG A B C D Total HCG D A B C D Total HCG Alpha Subunit Beta Subunit
  • 34. Free Beta hCG Assay Specificity B C * FTB11 Ab Labelled Ab B D Beta Subunit
  • 35. Pregnancy Associated Plasma Protein A (PAPP A) PAPP-A - Pregnancy associated Plasma Protein-A. Placental protein which continues to increase during the term of the pregnancy Homotetrameric glycoprotein synthetized in Homotetrameric glycoprotein synthetized in chorionic villi. Specific and potent inhibitor of granulocyte elastase. Serum levels lower in Down’s pregnancies in 1st trimester screening period
  • 36. Nuchal Translucency (NT) − Ideally performed between 11 13 weeks (10+2- 14+6 FMF). − NT thickness is a measure of the amount of fluid at the back of the foetal neck at the back of the foetal neck − 3 measurements to the nearest 0.1 mm are advised. − The thickness is higher in Down’s pregnancies during screening period.
  • 38. Foethus with DS Foethus with DS NT (3,4 mm) NT (3,4 mm)
  • 39. Foethus with Turner syndrom NT (10 mm)
  • 40. NT – influence on result of screening Age 30 let NT 1,0 MoM PAPP-A 0,65 MoM MS-AFP 0,72 MoM Age 30 let NT 1,7 MoM PAPP-A 0,65 MoM MS-AFP 0,72 MoM MS-AFP 0,72 MoM uE3 0,68 MoM HCG 1,52 MoM Inhibin-A 1,49 MoM 1:930 Negative MS-AFP 0,72 MoM uE3 0,68 MoM HCG 1,52 MoM Inhibin-A 1,49 MoM 1:65 Positive
  • 41. Risk calculation Nuchal Translucency (NT) measurement. Maternal age + NT account for 80% overall Maternal age + NT account for 80% overall risk Maternal age + NT + Biochemistry 88-90%.
  • 42. RISK ASSESMENT MoMs that typically yield a high risk of Down’s are those where, in combination, the Free β HCG MoM is 2.5 and the PAPP-A is 0.4 HIGH RISK- Woman 35 years of age, with a NT of 2.0 mm, and Free β HCG MoM 2.5 and PAPP-A 2.0 mm, and Free β HCG MoM 2.5 and PAPP-A MoM 0.4 LOW RISK - Women 35 years of age, with a NT of 2.0 mm, combined with a Free β HCG and PAPP- A MoM of 1.0. Further tests required at an overall risk of 1:150
  • 43. Advantages of 1st Trimester Screening Information earlier, more options Reduce number of invasive procedures May identify other severe anomalies (or risk May identify other severe anomalies (or risk for) at time of scan and increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcome—referral for 2nd trimester Good time to date pregnancy accurately NT good for multiple gestation
  • 44. Gynaecologist 11. – 13. wk US - NT CRL 45-84mm 10. -12. wk laboratory Scheme of 1st trimester screening Calculation of risk CVS / AMC US screening in 20. - 22. wk Positive results negative
  • 45. Diagnostic Tests Amniocentesis – Usually performed between 15 18 weeks. – Amniotic fluid removed by needle inserted into uterus transabdominal (located by US). – foetal cells cultured (cytogenetics lab). – Molecular biology techniques instead of full karyotyping. – Enables detection of other chromosomal abn. – Risk of miscarriage approx. 1 in 100.
  • 46. Diagnostic Tests Chorionic Villus Sampling (CVS) – Performed around 11 to 13 weeks. – Chorionic villi sample removed from developing placenta (trans abdominally developing placenta (trans abdominally or trans vaginally under US control). – Slightly higher miscarriage rate than amnio.
  • 47. Screening of congenial development defects Currently perform: – screening of Down syndrom and NTD in the II.trimester of pregnacy • hCG • AFP • AFP – screening of DS in the I.trimester • Free β hCG • PAPP-A • Nuchal translucency – NT • Present of nose bone – integrated test
  • 48. Integrated test 1st trimester determination of PAPP-A, optionally free βhCG 2nd trimester determination of AFP and total hCG determination of GA by US measuring of NT first evaluation by physician common evaluation with I. trimester results
  • 49. AMNIO-PCR Only a small amount of amniotic fluid is required Applicable to a wide range of pregnancies (12 to 34 weeks) Definitive results within 24 h 100% accurate in the detection of major 100% accurate in the detection of major autosomal trisomies • Trisomy 21 (Down syndrom) • Trisomy 18 (Edwards syndrom) • Trisomy 13 (Patau syndrom) • Triploidy • Sex chromosome aneuploidy
  • 50. Ethical considerations Who is the patient? Who benefits? Tests far from perfect - 65% detection Highly stressful - patients and staff Highly stressful - patients and staff Stigmatisation of surviving Down’s patients Can appropriate counselling be provided?
  • 51. Screening Ethics Religion What will be after diagnosis? Pregnant women and her family? Pregnant women and her family? Gynaecologists and midwifes – agree with abortion? • The Hippocratic Oath (“primum non nocere”) • Religion • Czech Republic – the atheistic country
  • 52. Conclusions Down’s Syndrome screening feasible Technically imperfect New approaches may help – US, DNA technology technology Current aim is for first trimester screening Ethical issues cannot be ignored Informed decision making essential
  • 53. Information for pregnant Consultation before performation of screening Posibility of consultation during all pregnancy during all pregnancy www pages Laboratory communication with gyneacologists and geneticts
  • 54.
  • 55.
  • 56. Screening of DS 1st trimester 2nd trimester Integrated PAPP-A free β β β β hCG Nuchal translucency (NT) AFP hCG uE3
  • 57. Detection rate FP for 85% DR DR for 5% FP I.trimester combined test 3,8 - 6,8% 85% II.trimester 9,3 - 14 % 69% integrated test 0,8 - 1,2% 94% serum integrated test 2,7 - 5,2% 85%
  • 58. Prenatal diagnoses of DS V.Gregor, Genetic, Thomayer Hospital, Prague , Czech Republic
  • 59. Ratio DS diagnoses in the first and second trimester 1st trim. 2nd trim. V.Gregor, Genetic, Thomayer Hospital, Prague , Czech Republic
  • 60. QUALITY CONTROL Quality Control specimens are run daily at all levels of the working range for all assays (precision). External Quality Control for 2nd trimester is organized by SEKK or DGKC, for 1st trimester organized by SEKK or DGKC, for 1st trimester by UKNEQAS (accuracy). This allows for comparisons between different methodologies in different laboratories to be made.
  • 61. Europe In In some some countries countries is is screening screening defined defined by by state state health health care care Majority Majority of of countries countries perform perform AMC AMC after after 35. 35. Majority Majority of of countries countries perform perform AMC AMC after after 35. 35. France 38 France 38 Finland Finland 40 40
  • 62. International status of abortion law: Legal on request llegal with exception for rape, maternal life, health, mental health, foetal defects, and/or socioeconomic factors llegal with exception for rape, maternal life, health, mental health, and/or foetal defects llegal with exception for rape, maternal life, health, and/or mental health llegal with exception for maternal life, health, and/or mental health llegal with no exceptions Varies by region No information Wikipedia
  • 63. Summary Despite of increasing participation of US, the biochemical testing has still major role in Down’s screening Current aim is for first trimester screening but many practical problems are associated - certification, high level of cooperation (one-day service) level of cooperation (one-day service) Increased standardization for all participants Biochemical testing for NTD is being superseded by US Ethical issues cannot be ignored Informed decision making essential
  • 64. Future in prenatal testing 1997 First report of free foetal DNA in maternal circulation. (Lo YMD et al. Lancet 1997;350:485-7) Investigations focused on the role of cell-free foetal DNA and foetal messenger RNA Placenta Maternal plasma Maternal blood cells
  • 65. Extraction of cell free foetal nucleic acids Cell free foetal DNA (3.4%) Cell free maternal DNA (96.6%) 11 – 17 weeks Cell free maternal DNA (96.6%) •Population variation • Low copy number of cf foetal DNA • Background ‘contamination’ with cf maternal DNA (94 – 97%) Helen White, PhD. National Genetics, Reference Lab (Wessex)
  • 66. Development of techniques with improved detection levels e.g.Pyrophosphorolysis Activated Polymerisation (PAP) New advances Real time PCR, mass spectrometry (1:106) Pyrophosphorolysis Activated Polymerisation (1:109) Detection Level • Theoretical detection level of 10-9 (improvement on RQ-PCR) • foetal sexing n=54 (Boon et al., Prenatal Diagnosis 2007) • Sensitivity 100 % (95% CI: 5.56% chance of false negative) • Specificity 98.1 % (95% CI: 91.5% - 99.9%) [1 false positive] • Potential for detection of paternal mutations • Requires high purity blocked oligonucleotides – risk of false positives spectrometry Activated Polymerisation (PAP) Helen White, PhD. National Genetics, Reference Lab (Wessex)
  • 67. Detection of aneuploidy The ability to use NIPD to detect foetal aneuploidies, particularly trisomy 21, represents a major breakthrough in prenatal diagnosis • Major technical challenge Background of cf maternal DNA mean direct quantification of foetal chromosome copy number is not yet feasible Need targets that are free from maternal background interference • Recent major breakthroughs Quantitative analysis of SNPs in foetal specific mRNA transcripts (Lo et al., PNAS 2007; Lo et al., Nature Medicine 2007; Maron et al, 2007) Epigenetic analysis (Tong et al., 2006; Old et al, 2007) Proteomic analysis (e.g. Nagalla et al., 2007) Identification of novel protein biomarkers in maternal plasma associated with trisomy 21 pregnancies Helen White, PhD. National Genetics, Reference Lab (Wessex)
  • 68. Quantitative analysis of SNPs in foetal specific mRNA • PLAC4 mRNA ( ) is derived exclusively from foetal chromosome 21 • PLAC4 mRNA expressed in the placenta and is found in the plasma of pregnant women Normal fetus Trisomy 21 fetus Lo et al., Nature Med PNAS, 2007 1 : 1 2 : 1 • Correctly diagnosed foetal trisomy 21 in 90% of +21 cases (n=10) • Excluded diagnosis of trisomy 21 in 96.5% of chromosomally normal controls (n=57) • Foetus has to be informative for SNP analysed
  • 69. Hahn S, Lapaire O, Tercanli S, Kolla V, Hösli I. Expert Rev Mol Med 2011:13:e16
  • 70. MPS – Implementation on Ilumina platform Sample preparation (cca. 270 USD) Cluster preparation (cca. 600 USD) sequenator (1500 USD for 1 cell, 7 pac.+QC) sequenator (1500 USD for 1 cell, 7 pac.+QC) Data analysis, evaluation 3 working days Price of device – 600.000 USD
  • 71. Summary DNA Extraction • Enrichment of cf foetal DNA – will improve reliability of testing • Any technique that can separate cf maternal and cf foetal DNA would revolutionise NIPD Foetal sexing and single gene disorders • Already in diagnostic use although development of more foetal specific markers required • New techniques with increased levels of detection are being reported in research settings. Requires diagnostic validation Aneuploidy • Use of mRNA SNP allele ratio for testing for DS testing has been successfully applied in research setting. Requires diagnostic validation • Epigenetic studies ongoing and proteomics studies are promising Lack of quality control material and method standardisation Helen White, PhD. National Genetics, Reference Lab (Wessex)
  • 72. PGD PGD – Preimplantation genetic diagnosis Combines protocols of IVF and genetic testing Handyside and Verlinsky – 1990 Biopsy of polar bodies of oocytes (less Biopsy of polar bodies of oocytes (less frequenlty) Biopsy of embryonal blastomeres (more frequenlty) Sampling – 8 cells embryos i.e. 3. days after egg fertilization Egg must be fertilized by one sperm (ICSI)
  • 73. Methods of testing Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) PCR Microarray
  • 74. Diseases that can be diagnosed Aneuploidy (sensitivity 90%) Abortion of foetus when one of the parents is known as a carrier of translocations Monogennous diseases (sickle cell anemia, cystic Monogennous diseases (sickle cell anemia, cystic fibrosis, Huntigton’s disease, Tay-Sachs disease Carrier translocations Maternal Gonosomal mosaicism Each test is always disease specific
  • 75.
  • 77. Literature: Pandya, P.P. et al (1995) Br J Obstet Gynacol 102: 957-962 Spencer, K. et al (1999) Ultrasound Obstet Gynacol 13: 231-237 Tasevski V, Ward P, Koe L. and Morris J. Feto-Maternal Medicine Laboratory Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards, NSW AUSTRALIA Dr Rick Jones, Division of Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK Dr Rick Jones, Division of Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK Allan Thompson: NTD and Down’s Screening, Bayer Diagnostics Stevenson, Leslie and Sheridan, Ann.Clin.Biochem 30, 99-100 (1993)