SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 141
Petrophysicist (Geologist)
For Practical Use and References
PETROPHYSICAL INTERPRETATION:
 Logging Environment & HC EVALUATION
 Logs Show Permeable Zone .
A. Spontaneous Potential (SP)
B. Gamma Ray (GR)
 Logs measure Formation resistivity
A. Log Induction
B. Log Lateral
 Logs measure Formation porosity
A. Log Neutron
B. Log Densities
C. Log Sonic
 Clean Formation Evaluation
 Shaly Formation Evaluation
LOGGING ENVIRONMENT
Logging Environment & HC EVALUATION
LOGGING ENVIRONMENT
Drilling Process:
 Mud Pressure (Pm)
 hydrostatic fluid Pressure in pore
Formation (Pr) Differ to :
 Avoid “Blowout”
 Push Liquid to Formation (invasion proses).
 invasion Proses make solid material (mud cake).
 Liquid in to formation Mud Fitrate
LOGGING ENVIRONMENT
LOGGING ENVIRONMENT
Nomenclature:
Borehole:
Rm = Resistivity of mud.
Rmc = Resistivity of mud cake.
Flushed Zone:
Rmf = Resistivity of mud filtrate.
RXO = Resistivity of flushed zone.
SXO = Water Saturation of flushed zone.
Uninvaded or Virgin Zone:
RT = True resistivity of formation.
RW = Resistivity of formation water.
SW = Formation Water Saturation.
RS = Resistivity of adjacent bed or shoulder
bed resistivity.
di = Diameter of invasion.
dh = Borehole diameter.
h = Bed thickness.
1. “Flushed zone” with diameter (df.)
Contain “Mud Filtrate” (Rm )
Contain “Residual Hydrocarbon”
Has Rock Resistivity Rxo.
Thick~ 6 inches, less or more
2. “Transition zone” with diameter (dj.)
Several feet.
3. Undisturbed zone:
Has Water Formation Resistivity (Rw), Rock Resistivity (Rt), and
Water Saturation (Sw) .
Archie experiment
A. Water Formation resistivity, Rw
Archie first measure water Formation resistivity in Tank.
“Measure flow I and voltage V, then water Formation resistivity , Rw”
formulate as follows:
V
Rw = ----- [ ohmm]
I
B. Rock Resistivity, Ro.
Archie analyse the rock. Begin with porosity calculation Ø.
Then the pore filled with water formation which the resistivity
was measured (Sw = 1).
On the experiment is Rw.
therefore :
V
Ro = --------- [ ohmm]
I2
Apparently Ro > Rw
Archie experiment
Archie repeat the experiment with different water salinity formation.
Resulting:
Ro1 = F Rw1
Ro2 = F Rw2
Ro3 = F Rw3
It seen that rock Resistivity (Ro) equal linearly with
Water Formation Resistivity (Rw).
Ro = F Rw (1)
whereF = Formation Resistivity Factor.
The experiment uses F & Ø data for about 300 rock sample.
The Value F & Ø plotted on axis and ordinate mathematically as follows:
1
F = ----------- (2)
Ø m
m = Cementation exponent, m = 1.3 - 2.2
Archie experiment
THE RELATION OF FORMATION RESISTIVITY FACTOR (F) VERSUS
PERMEABILITY (K) AND POROSITY (Ø)
C. Rock Resistivity (Rt).
Due to search oil, then the rock on experiment
begin with filled with oil and water.
Addition oil mean Sw smaller than one:
Sw < 1
The measurement resulting Rock Resistivity ( Rt )
Where:
Rt bigger thanRo,
Rt equal linearly with Ro.
Rt = I Ro (3)
Were I = Resistivity index
“ Smaller Sw mean more oil in the pore & bigger Rt bigger resistivity index (I).”
So I andSw relation as follows:
1
I = ----------- (4)
Sw n
where n = Saturation exponent, about = 2
From above, can be formulated as follows :
F. Rw
Sw n = ------------------- (5)
Rt
The formula known as Archie Formula.
Principal Logging Measurement:
Measure Reservoir Resistivity (R1).
Measure Water Resistivity (R2).
if (R1) > (R2), then there is HC in the reservoir (R1) .
Calculate Volume HC in Reservoir
HC occurrence in pore can be measure with electrical Formation
resistivity.
Assumes:
Rock Matrix cannot flow the electrical current.
it mean electrical current fully done throgh water on pore
Due to the water contain NaCl.
So the rock contain water with High Conductivity (orlow resistivity).
1
Note : Conductivity = -----------------
Resistivity
Archie formula as follows:
F x Rw Ro
Swn = ---------- = -----
Rt Rt
If n = 2,
Ro
Sw =  --------
Rt
This formula can be use if we have zone with containing water
(water bearing), with no porosity data
For Porosity value that usually seen on logging, Formation
Factor (F) calculated as follows:
1
on limestone: F = ---------
 2
0.81 0.62
on sandstone: F = ------ or F = ------
 2  2.15
wherea = cementation factor
Example using Archie Formula
Water Formation Resistivity (Rw) :
Water Formation Resistivity measurement, Rw, can be done using Archie
formula in zone containing water (seefig 2-2) :
Zone D is water zone due to low Resistivity value
, that is Rt = 0.3 ohmm (assumes Sw = 1)
and the Porosity is about 0.35
F Rw
Sw2 = 1 = ---------
0.3
Rw calculated about 0.045 ohmm.
Formation Evaluation conducted with use 3 log type:
 Log show Permeable Zone.
Spontaneous Potential
Gamma Ray
 Log measure Formation Resistivity
Deep Induction
Deep Laterolog
 Log measure Porosity.
Density
Neutron
Sonic
Finding Production zone?
Permeable Zone use Log SP or GR :
“Shale base line” on the right show shale
(impermeable and cannot be produced).
Deflection SP to left shows “Clean Zones”
(sand or limestone) may be productive.
Log-log Resistivity :
High resistivity shows HC or “tight zones” or
zones low porosity.
Low resistivity shows containing water.
Log-log Porosity
Shows zone with pore or
“ tight ”.
SP Log
(Spontaneous Potential)
Log SP APPLICATION :
 To differentiate permeable and non-permeable of rock.
 To “well to well” Correlation.
 As reference of depth for all logs.
 To define layer limit.
 To calculate Rw value.
 As clay indicator.
Work Principal :
 An electrode insert to bore hole then record the electrical potential at
any point with reference on surface electrical potential
 So the SP log is different of potential record between an moveable
electrode in borehole and another electrode on surface
 The Mud must conductive.
 Logging speed may 1500 m/hr.
LOG SP MEASUREMENT
Figure 2.
Figure 1.
Origin Log SP Measurement
Figure 9.
Figure 10.Figure 8.
Figure 7.
Origin Log SP Measurement
SP Deflection.
 The SP curve constant but deflect to another level if pass the limit of the
different formation that differ.
 Rock surface that permeable containing water, then
 If Rmf > Rw SP deflect to left (SP negatif).
 If Rmf < Rw SP deflect right (SP positif).
 There is no SP deflection on rock surface that non-permeabel or shale
surface.
Figure 1. Figure 2.
LOG SP MEASUREMENT
SP DEFLECTION
Figure 4.
SP Log Presentation:
SP curve presented in I with millivolt unit.
There is no Absolut scale, but use 10 mV per small division.
Usually use scale –80 to 20 mV
GR Log
( Gamma Ray )
Application Log GR.
 Standard Gamma Ray Application:
 As main Reference to all run logging.
 To “well to well” correlation.
 Differentiate permeable and nonpermeable zone .
 Calculate volume clay.
 Natural Gamma Ray Tool (NGT) Application:
 To detect, recognize and evaluate radioactive minerals .
 Recognize the clay type and calculate volume clay.
 Permeable zone that may contain Uranium much more than less permeable
zone.
 Uranium reading on NGT log sometime useful as clue the existing fluid
movement.
Principal work of GR Log.
 Gamma Rays that naturally come:
This Gamma Ray comes naturally in rocks and has relatively low
energy.
Device to measure gamma ray natural are:
1. Standard Gamma ray Tool (SGT)
2. Natural Gamma Spectrometry Tool (NGT)
 SGT measure all natural GR.
 NGT beside measure all GR, also measure GR energy and define
the concentration of 3 type radioactive element that usually in
nature :
Uranium (Ur235/238)
Potassium (isotope 19K40) and
Thorium (Th232)
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Type radioactive element
Gamma Ray (GR)
Specifications
Measurement Range :
Gamma API Units : 0 to 400 API
Measurement Accuracy :
Gamma API Units : ± 1 API
Maxium Ratings :
Pressure : 20,000 psi (138,000 kPa)
Temperature : 350 o F (177 o C)
Dimensions :
Tool Length : 4.4 ft (2.30 m)
Tool Weight 80 lb (36 kg)
Maximum Diameter : 3.5 in (89 mm)
The Gamma Ray measures natural formation radioactivity, making it an excellent tool for correlation
purposes over the life of a well
Induced Gamma Ray Tools:
The devices putted radioactive sources that transmit gamma ray with
high energy.
Example density log tools:
FDC - Formation Density Compensated
LDT – Litho Density Tool
Depth of Investigation and
Vertical Resolution.
Depth of Investigation SGT about 10 inci.
Depth of Investigation NGT about 15 inci.
Vertical Resolution SGT about 10 inci
Vertical Resolution NGT about 15 inci.
Presentation kurva GR
The gamma ray curve presented in
Track I.
Common scale use 0-200 API.
Can reduce to 0-150 API or 0-
120 API if gamma ray activity
low.
The NGT curve presented:
○ SGR: Total Gamma
Ray.
○ CGR: total GR less by
Uranium
○ Ratio Th/K
○ Ratio Th/U
LQC dan Corrections
In free shale Rock, log GR recording low value about 20-30 API.
In “Shaly Formation” log GR has value 80 to 300 API.
Environmental corrections
Large borehole and much weight mud can reduce the value of GR rock
measurement.
“centered” tools in borehole will receive gamma ray less than the GR tools that
“eccentered”.
GR devices that survey in well contain KCl mud will accept GR much more
due to high Potassium content.
Therefore the correction as parameter:
Hole size & mud weight.
Correction KCl content
Casing size & Casing weight
cement.
Example of correction GR
As bore hole
 Find GR value after conduct correction
if value log GR = 32 API,
 hole size (dhole) =12 inci,
 mud weight (Wmud) = 9.2 lb/gal,
 tool diameter (dsonde) = 3 3/8”, as
survey “centered”.
 Calculate:
t = Wmud x [2.54(dhole) –
2.54(dsonde)]/[8.345 x 2]
= 12 g/cm2
 Then follow redline (chart) with input t
= 12 g/cm2 for gain correction factor
1.2
 GRcorrected = 1.2 x GRlog = 38.4 API
Interpretation
 Percentage shale in rocks
calculated by formula:
(GRlog – GRclean)
Vshale = ---------------------------------
(GRshale – GRclean)
 Survey by NGT tool give curve
Uranium, Potassium and
Thorium curve .
Figure Mineral Identification from
Spectral Gamma Ray
Interpretation
Interpretation
Logs that measure
Formation Resistivity
 The Main Basic Formula Interpretation is:
F. Rw
Sw2 = ----------
Rt
 The most important Input is Rt, uninvaded zone resistivity .
 With invasion then logging has create 3 type Resistivity tools:
Deep investigation.
Medium investigation.
Shallow investigation.
 Resistivity a liquid always presented with Temperatur.
Example:
Rmf = 0.30 ohm-m @ 80 degF
Rw = 0.10 ohm-m @ 120 degF
 from resistivity data and temperature, can be found liquid salinity with Chart
Gen-9.
Resistivity Logs
Resistivity of NaCl solution
(Schlumberger chart GEN-9)
Classification and Application.
Table 4-1 above is Resistivity tools classification until 1987
classification based on radius of investigation :
Deep : 3 + feet
Medium : 1.5 - 3 feet
Shallow : 1- 6 inches.
all curve deep, medium and shallow recorded use electrodes or
coils putted on mandrel silindris, and placed more less centralized
in borehole.
Microresistivity devices use sensor that putted on pad that
forced close in wall of borehole wall as survey conducted.
 Log Induction worked in:
Fresh mud
Resistivity formation < 200 ohm-m
Rmf/Rw > 2.0
 Log Lateral will better work in:
Salt Mud
Resistivity formation > 200 ohm-m
Rmf/Rw < 2.0
Large borehole >12 in. also deep invasion (>40in.)
Log Induction & Lateral
Figure 1.
Log Induction
Principal Work.
 Induction devices to define
resistivity with measure rocks
conductivity. In transmitter
flowed by high frequency current
with constant amplitude that will
attain magnet field in rocks.
 The magnet fields attain Eddy
current or Foucault current in
other name called ground loop.
 The value of the current equal to
rocks conductivity
Simultaneous triple induction (STI)
SPHERICALLY FOCUSSED RESISTIVITY SECTION
• Electrode System : Integrated into mandrel
• Measurements Range : 0,2 to 2000 ohm-in
• Outputs : V0 and I0
• Accuracy : 5 % of reading
• Inputs : Cal, Zero, Return select
• Full Vertical Resolution : 25 in (64 cm)
Accurate resistivity measurement with high vertical
resolution is vital for the determination of true
formation resistivity and flushed zone resistivity, two
essential parameters of formation evaluation
Open Hole Services
Depth of Investigation & Vertical Resolution.
LATEROLOG – INDUCTION LOGS
Better use Induction than
Laterolog if
1. Rmf/Rw > 2.5
2. Rt < 200 ohmm
3. Thickness > 10ft
If porosity bellow Rw but
Rmf/Rw still > 2.5 then
Laterolog should be used
Presentation Log Induction.
 The deep Induction log
presented on track 3-4 with
logarithmic scale, as dashed
curve with mnemonic ILD.
 The medium induction log
also on track 3-4 with
logarithmic scale, as dashed
curve with mnemonic ILM.
 The shallow focused log
also on track 3-4 with
logarithmic scale, as
continue curve with
mnemonic SFLU (spherically
focused log).
 logarithmic Scale usually 4
cycles, from 0.2 s/d 2000
with unit [ohmm].
LQC / Interpretation
 Due to mud filtrate, therefore ILM
between ILD and SFLU.
 ILD<ILM<SFLU Profile must shown on
log Induction,
because of this condition Rmf/Rw > 2.5
fulfilled.
Figure 4.
Correction Log Induction.
 Induction log need to be
corrected with:
 Borehole corrections: mud
resistivity and borehole size
(figure 11)
 Tool standoff corrections
(figure 11)
 Bed thickness and shoulder
bed corrections (fig.12)
 Invasion corrections (figure
13)
 SFLU log also need to be
corrected as mud resistivity
and borehole size. (figure 10)
Correction Log Induction
Correction Log Induction
Lateral Log
Application Log Lateral.
Laterolog device designed for measure rock resistivity that drilled with salty
mud or very conductive mud also used for detect zones that contain HC.
Prinsipal work Log Lateral.
Sonde on resistivity tools has bucking electrode to focus survey current and
insist to flow in vertical to sonde.
The focused current make possible to measure done on rocks with presize
direction.
This is the fixing tools that use unfocused current such ES (Electrical Survey)
the previous, where the current survey more likely flow in mud due to mud
resistivity is lesser than rock resistivity
Figure 3.
Log Lateral.
The Dual Laterolog measures
formation resistivity over a wide
dynamic range. It provides accurate
readings up to 40,000 ohm-m.
The DLL is generally the resistivity
tool of choice in wells drilled with salt
mud's, Especially if formation resistivity
are high.
DUAL LATEROLOG (DLL)
Measurenment Range
Deep Resistivity, LLd : 0,2 to 40,000 ohm-m
Medium Resistivity, LLm : 0,2 to 40,000 ohm-m
Measurement Precision
Deep Resistivity, LLd : ± 2 %
Medium Resistivity, LLm : ± 2 %
Open Hole Services
DLT & MSFL tools
Micro Spherically Focused Log (MSFL)
SPECIFICATIONS
MEASUREMENT RANGE :
MSFL Conductivity : 0 to 5,000 ms/m
Caliper : 4 to 21 in (100 to 530 mm)
MEASUREMENT PRECISION:
MSFL Conductivity : +/-2 mS/m
Caliper : +/-0,1 in (+/-2.5 mm)
MAXIMUM RATINGS :
Pressure: 20,000Psi (138,000 kPa)
Temperature : 350 o F (177 o C)
DIMENSIONS
• Tool Length : 10,6 ft (3,23m)
• Tool Weight : 200 lb (91 kg)
• Maximum Diameter : 4,0 (102 mm)
The MSFL can be used in fresh or saline muds. The pad
mounted device incorporates a caliper measurement and the
tool is typically run in combination with another resistivity
device, most often the Dual Laterolog.
The MSFL is a pad-Type microresistivity device employing a
concentric arrangement of five electrodes to force the measurement current into a hemispherical pattern
Open Hole Services
Depth of Investigation and Vertical Resolution
LIMITATION & PRESENTATION
 Laterolog tools used to survey on well filled with mud with low
resistivity also in rocks high resistivity
 Laterolog tools can accurately measure rocks resistivity about 0.2 –
40000 ohmm.
Laterolog tools recomed to use if:
 Ratio Rmf/Rw < 2.5
 Rocks resistivity > 200 ohmm.
 Thickness < 10 feet.
 Deep laterolog presented in track 3-4, logarithmic scale as thin line
dashed with mnemonic LLD
 Shallow laterolog presented in track 3-4, logarithmic scale as dotted
line with mnemonic LLS
 Microresistivity presented in track 3-4, logarithmic scale as solid line
with mnemonic MSFL.
 logarithmic scale usually in 4 cycle : 0.2 – 2000 ohmm.
LATEROLOG PRESENTATION
Resistivity Curve can be use as
indicator percentage
clay in rocks, VRT:
(Rsand – Rt)
VRT = ------------------------- x 4 Rclay/Rt
(Rsand – Rclay)
VRT usually relatively too high,
except the rocks with high
Resistivity.
Due to clay is conductive, with
minimal value Rsand will get value
VRT 100%
LATEROLOG PRESENTATION
Correction Lateral Log
MSFL borehole corrections (fig.14)
Borehole corrections – to mud resistivity and borehole size (fig.15)
Bed thickness corrections (fig.16)
Invasion corrections – to invasion mud filtrate (fig. 17)
Fig.15 Laterolog Borehole Correction Chart
Fig. 17: Laterolog Invasion Correction Chart
Log that measure
Porosity
Density Log
Log Density Application
 Density tool measure density of rocks then use to define rock porosity.
 Together with another logs such log neutron, rocks lithology and fluids
type containing in the rocks can be defined.
 Log density can differentiate Oil to gas in pore due to the fluids has
different density.
 Density tool in modern age also measure PEF (photoelectric effect) that
useful for defining rocks lithology, identify heavy minerals and evaluate
clay.
 Log density also use to define Vclay also to calculate “reflection
coefficients” along with log sonic to make synthetics seismogram.
Principal work Density tool
 A radioactive sources Cs137 has 1.5 Curie transmit GR
energy 662 kev to the rocks.
 Gamma rays interact with rocks electrons with
Compton scattering mechanism, where gamma rays
lose its energy also spread to many direction.
 Compton scattering Proses result “clouds” gamma
ray around source with radius vary according Rocks
electron.
 The more rocks electron the shorter clouds radius and
therefore lesser gamma ray reach to the detector
(count rates).
 So e reverse equal to count rates or cps that accepted
by detector
 Gamma ray detected that less amount shows the
existing larger electron density.
 Bulk density b for many element has value near equal
with electron density e as empirical equation bellow:
b = 1.0704 e – 0.1883
 The Litho density tools not only measure density, but also photoelectric
absorption index PEF.
 Photoelectric absorption happen if gamma ray that come has low energy.
 There gamma ray catch by core atom and an electron throw by the atom.
PEF = (Z/10)3.6
where:
Z = number atom (= amount electron inatom).
 Each element has Z particular value therefore PEF can be use as clue for
rocks type.
 PEF value very little depends on rocks porosity as seen on figure bellow
 PEF also only little influenced by fluid in pores, but log PEF influenced by
barite content on mud, because number atom Barium is high (Z=56).
Principal work Density tool
Principal work Density tool
Principal work Density tool
Principal work Density tool
tools
Figure 2.
Figure 1.
Principal work Density tool
Calculation of Density Porosity PHID
(its porosity from RHOB) :
Due to bulk density b is amount of matrix density ma and fluid density f in pores
then the porosity value of rocks can be define if the value ma (Recognize first the
lithology).
b = ma (1-PHID) + f (PHID)
the equation will be:
PHID = (b - ma ) / (f - ma )
where:
ma = matrix density
f = fluid density in pores
Porosity from RHOB
QC/Interpretations.
 Shales Density usually smaller than rocks density that free of clay (clean
formation). Therefore shales porosity higher than rocks porosity.
 The term “limestone compatible scales”, then:
 In clean limestone RHOB & NPHI will overlay in shales RHOB will be in
right side of NPHI,
 In limestone that contain gas, NPHI will be in the right side of RHOB.
 In clean sand that contain water, NPHI will be in right side of RHOB
about 6-7 p.u.
 In dolomite RHOB will be in right side of NPHI, similar with shale but
gamma ray usually has higher value in dolomite.
 The term “Sandstone compatible scales”, then :
 In sandstone rocks the curve RHOB and NPHI will overlay.
 Due to PEF water, hydrogen and oxygen is near zero, then porosity effect
to PEF vey small and basic lithology usually can be define direct to PEF
curve (see6.2 Typical log reading).
Typical log reading
Perhitungan Volume Shale (Vsh)
A shaly formation on the figure if Vsh is shale part in
rocks, then matrix part is (1-Vsh-), then:
b = ma (1-Vsh-) + sh Vsh + f 
and
(ma - b ) – Vsh (ma - sh )
 = -----------------------------------------------
(ma - f )
therfore
(ma - b ) –  (ma - f )
Vsh = ----------------------------------------
(ma - sh )
Shale influence the porosity density and porosity
neutron.
If both corrected with shale effect, it will get effective
porosity as follows:
e = D - Vsh D
e = N - Vsh N
Typical Log Readings:
Recommend Parameter
RHOB correction should be done to:
Mud cake thickness ( in real time)
Mud weight (alsoreal time)
Rugose hole (real time)
Borehole size.
Log Neutron
Application Log Neutron
 Neutron tools used for define primary rocks porosity, that is rocks
pore filled by water, oil or gas
 Together with another log lain such log density, can be use to
define rock type /lithology also fuluid type that fill the rocks pores.
 Elastic scattering:
Neutron Particle collide with another atom, therefore neutron
particle change direction, but has still same energy.
 Inelastic scattering:
The collide with another atom, neutron particle has lose half
its energy that given to atom that collided. This Atom
experiencing “excitation”,then transmit energy again in
Gamma Ray form that has specific spektrum.
neutron Particle also change direction in this collide.
Application Log Neutron
Principal work Neutron tools
 Radioaktif source Am241Be transmit Neutron particle to the rocks about
5 MeV energy.
 After collition with the rocks, the neutron energy reduce to level 0.1-10
eV (level epithermal).
 The collisions next reduces energy further to less than 0.025 eV (level
thermal).
 Due to mass Hydrogen near with Neutron, atom Hydrogen has bigger
ability in slowing down neutron particle than another atoms in rocks.
 Two thermal detector put on 1-2 ft upper radioactive sources.
Ratio between amounts pulse : Nn/Nf are porosity function.
 This Ratio has:
Bore hole influence reduced
Penetration depth further than one detector system .
Principal work Neutron tools
Principal work Neutron tools
Principal work Neutron tools
Principal work Neutron tools
Depth of Investigation and Vertical Resolution.
Presentation Log Neutron.
Neutron porosity presented on
track 5 - 6 with mnemonic NPHI
with scale:
45% sampai - 15% or
.45 sampai -.15 p.u
60% sampai 0% or
.60 sampai 0 p.u
Log Quality Control and Interpretation.
 Shale influence reading log, then NPHI higher than true porosity due to
water bound on shales.
 The washed out well also make reading log higher than true porosity.
 Rocks contain gas has hydrogen concentration lower than contain oil or
water, therefore reading neutron log willl smaller than true porosity.
The term “limestone compatible scale” are:
RHOB : 1.95 - 2.95
NPHI : 45% - -15%
 In limestone without shale content water RHOB curves and NPHI will
overlay.
 In shale rocks RHOB on right side NPHI.
 In limestone contain gas, RHOB on left side NPHI. Separation larger than 6-
7 p.u
 In sand without shale contain water , RHOB on left side NPHI with
separation 6-7 p.u
 In dolomite without shale contain water, RHOB on the right side NPHI.
The term “sandstone compatible scale” are:
RHOB: 1.90 gr/cc - 2.90 gr/cc
NPHI : 45 % - -15 %
 In sandstone without shale contain water RHOB and NPHI curves will
overlay.
 In shale RHOB on the right side NPHI.
 In sandstone contain gas, RHOB on the left side NPHI. Separation larger
than 3 p.u
 In sandstone without shale contain oil , RHOB on the left side NPHI with
separation 1-3 p.u
Log Quality Control and Interpretation
Formation content liquid.
 All points porosity contain water will fall in area line sandstone and
dolomite.
 True Porosity can predict by:
PHI = (PHID + PHIN)/2
 For clean formation contain liquid, porosity above are effective porosity,
and the value can be read as middle Density & Neutron logs.
Formation content gas.
 The exchange liquid with gas in pores reduce bulk density and hydrogen
content.
 Density go down - PHID go up.
 Hydrogen content go down - PHIN go up.
 The result is crossover effect recognize in Neutron and Density logs
shows gas.
 PHIN most bigger than PHID except crossover zone, that shows interval
contain gas.
 Another way measure porosity is use formula:
PHI = (PHID2 + PHIN2)/2
 With above formula will get porosity that close with the chart.
 Therefore in formation contain gas, porosity not middle between
Neutron and Density, but 2/3 distance between log Neutron to log
Density.
 Shale reduce the porosity Density measurement and Neutron. shale
Volume can be calculated as follows:
VDshale = (PHID - PHIeff)/PHIDsh
VNshale = (PHIN - PHIeff)/PHINsh
Environmental Corrections.
 The quality of log guarantee good if been contacted between neutron tools with
borehole wall.
 Environmental corrections should be done to log NPHI are:
 Borehole size
 Borehole salinity
 Borehole temperature and pressure.
 Mud cake
 Mud weight
 Formation salinity
 Toll stand-off from wall of bore hole
Environmental Corrections.
Example Neutron Environmental Correction:
 Uncorrected TNPH =34 pu in hole 12” reduce with 2 pu as correction to bore hole size.
 If mud cake ¼ inch, no mud cake effect.
 If salinity borehole 100 kppm, add with 1 pu.
 If used natural mud with density 11 lb/gal then add with 2 pu.
 If temperature borehole 150 degF, add with 4 pu.
 If 5kpsi water based mud, reduce 1 pu
 If 100kppm formation salinity, reduce 2.5 pu
Total borehole correction: -2+1+2+4-1-2.5 = 1.5 pu.
Associated Mnemonics
Example of Neutron Environmental Correction:
 Uncorrected TNPH =34 pu in hole 12” less by 2 pu as correction to bore
hole size.
 If mud cake ¼ inch, no mud cake effect.
 If salinity borehole 100 kppm, add 1 pu.
 If use natural mud with density 11 lb/gal then add 2 pu.
 If tem. borehole 150 degF, add 4 pu.
 If 5kpsi water based mud, remove 1 pu
 If 100kppm formation salinity, remove 2.5 pu
Total borehole correction: -2+1+2+4-1-2.5 = 1.5 pu.
Sonic Log
log sonic Application
To define sonic porosity (s)
To define volume of clay (Vs)
Along with another logs to define lithology
Time-depth relationship
To define reflection coefficients
Mechanical properties
To define cement CBL-VDL quality
Theory of measurement
Sonic tool measure: speed of voice/sonic in formation.
The principal on figure below :
Transmitter transmit a “pressure pulse” frequency 25 kHz.
The pulse resulting 6 wave:
Compressional wave and refracts wave
shear waving in formation.
direct two wave as long as sonde and in mud.
two surface wave as long as hole wall of well (pseudo Raleigh dan Stoneley)
The speed of the waves about 4000 to 25 000 ft/sec depend on lithology
Principal log sonic tool
 A compressional wave waving from transmitter via mud to formation ,
the waving in formation, then waving in mud again to reach receiver.
 Transmitter transmit one pulse.
 An electronic tool measure time from this pulse until time reach “the
first negative excursion” detected by near receiver.
 Transmitter transmit one pulse again.
 Measured the time from pulse second to time reach “the first negative
excursion” detected by far receiver.
The Differ between those both time then divide by distance between
receiver-receiver (span) as two ft resulting formation
transit times in microseconds/ft (sec/ft).
Compressional transit times vary:
40  sec/ft in hard formation
150  sec/ft in soft formation.
Reverse transit time is velocity [feet/sec].
Shear wave travel time can be measured by logging
Particular along with wave form processing.
Principal log sonic tool
Log sonic presented as DT in track 2
and 3, with sec/ft unit, bigger from
right to left .
The raise of porosity deflect curve to
the left, equal to reading density and
neutron.
Small pips in depth track is
“integrated travel time”.
With small pips: 1 msec; between
large pips: 10 msec
The Caliper dan Gamma Ray curves –
in track 1.
Presentation log sonic
Long spaced sonic tool
Depth of Investigation & Vertical Resolution.
Sonic log presentation
6.3 Mnemonics.
Recommend parameters
Sonic porosity transform:
By using Willie Time Average (WTA):
DTlog – DTma 1
S = -------------------- x -------
DTfl - Dtma Cp
where:
S = porosity sonic
DTma = transit time in 100% matrix.
DTlog = transit time read on log.
DTfl = transit time in 100% fluid
Cp = compaction factor:
Cp = 1 in hard formation
Cp = DTsh/100 in unconsolidated formation
Formula Raymer Hunt Gardner (RHG):
Sonic Porosity calculated with this formula no need Cp and more close to core
porosity value also porosity density-neutron differ by WTA.
Equation RHG as follows:
S = c x (DTlog-DTma)/DTlog
where : c = 0.67
c = 0.60 in gas saturated reservoir rock
Calculate Vsh from log Sonic:
If shale exist in rocks, the formula WTA tobe:
DTlog= DTma (1--Vsh) +DTfl.  + DTsh Vsh.
DTsh value usually found about 80-110 sec/ft.
Quick-look with Delta Log R
 Delta Log R quick-look method to find hydrocarbon by overlay between
deep resistivity curve with curve porosity
 No need to know a,m,n and Rw first
Basic Method Delta log R:
 deep resistivity curve and porosity curve overlay in clean zone content
water.
 In hydrocarbon zone, curve resistivity will raise.
 Resistivity scale: raise for example 0.2 - 2000 ohmm.
 So the raise of resistivity caused curve deflect to right
Delta Log R
Quick-look with Delta Log R
Quick-look with Delta Log R
Quick-look with Delta Log R
md (k) = (kcoef*PHIE**kexp)/(SWirr**2) (graphic 3)
REGRESION LOGARITMIC
grafik 2 Regresi Logaritmik kcore dan PHIcore sumur TJS-03
grafik 3 Permeabilitas core dan Log
md (k) = (kcoef*PHIE**kexp)/(SWirr**2) (graphic 3)
REGRESION LOGARITMIC
graphic 3 Permeability core and Log
INTERPRETATION METHODE
 Quick Look : D LOG R (DELTA LOG R)
 Interpretation by Cross Plot
a. Lithology Model Approach
- Cross Plot N-D
- Cross Plot N-S
- Cross Plot S-D
- Cross Plot M-N
b. Parameter Petrophysic calculation
- Picket Plot (a, m & Rw)
- Hingle Plot (Rw)
- Cross Plot RWA-GR (Rclay & Water formation salinity)
- Cross Plot PHIE-RHOMAU ( RhoH)
c. Permeability Calculation Approach
K = (kcoef x PHIEkexp)/(SWirr2) , mD
Cross Plot N-S
Cross Plot S-D
Cross Plot M-N
Picket Plot (a, m & Rw)
Hingle Plot (Rw)
Cross Plot RWA-GR
Cross Plot PHIE-OMAU ( RhoH)
D LOG R (DELTA LOG R)
Composite Log
Composite Log
CASE: T-42 (T-Field in South Africa)
T-42
(T-Field in South Africa)
T-42
PHI cutoff ~ 0.17
Sw cutoff ~ 0.57
Vcl~0.35
a= 1, m=1.99, n=2
(in South Africa)
T-42(T-Field in South Africa)
Log-Core Data Validation
Core Data:
Dean Stark
Avg. PHIE~21.7
Avg. Density 2.65
Avg. SW~11.16
PRELIMINARY
CLEAN PLUG CORE
ANALYSIS DATA
Avg. Perm~341.98mD
Petrophysic:
Avg. PHIE~19.83
(Mod simandoux,
A=1, m=2, n=2 )
Avg. SW~24.12
Or 16.2 (@ Sand)
(Resistivity Log)
Perm X~330mD
( PHIE & Vcl)
RWA adjustment to
0.1
(T-Field in South Africa)
1.00
10.00
100.00
1000.00
0 10 20 30 40 50
Permeability - Vcl Cross Plot
Perm X
VClay
Permeabili
ty
Permeability - VClay Crossplot of The OBSF-05 well
Properties Parameter cut
off
SW - Perm X Crossplot of The OBSF-05 well
SO-PHIE Crossplot of The OBSF-05 well
(T-Field in South Africa)
Reservoir Rock Type
Perm X - PHIE of The OBSF-05 well
(T-Field in South Africa)
PermX
Reservoir sand formation
divided three Rock type
based on Permeability –
PHIE (fraction) relation with
Vshale of OBSF-05 Core
data.
The Formation sand Rock
types consist of RT 1, RT 2
and RT 3 where each has
particular formula. RT 1 with
Volume Shale (Vsh) less
than 20% has low
permeability and low
porosity, RT 2 with Vsh.
20% to 40% has medium
permeability and medium
porosity, RT 3 with Vsh. Up
to 40% has high
permeability and medium-
high porosity.
 From many Sources
Reference

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

SP Log
SP Log SP Log
SP Log
 
formation evaluation chapter 1
formation evaluation chapter 1formation evaluation chapter 1
formation evaluation chapter 1
 
Sonic log
Sonic logSonic log
Sonic log
 
Well logging
Well loggingWell logging
Well logging
 
Introduction to Induction Logging
Introduction to Induction Logging Introduction to Induction Logging
Introduction to Induction Logging
 
Well Logging: 02 caliper log
Well Logging: 02 caliper logWell Logging: 02 caliper log
Well Logging: 02 caliper log
 
Basic Petrophysics
Basic PetrophysicsBasic Petrophysics
Basic Petrophysics
 
Wll logging
Wll loggingWll logging
Wll logging
 
Formation evaluation and well log correlation
Formation evaluation and well log correlationFormation evaluation and well log correlation
Formation evaluation and well log correlation
 
Quick look log analyses
Quick look log analysesQuick look log analyses
Quick look log analyses
 
Well logging
Well loggingWell logging
Well logging
 
Fmi log presentation
Fmi log presentationFmi log presentation
Fmi log presentation
 
Well logging, petroleum engineer...
Well logging, petroleum engineer...Well logging, petroleum engineer...
Well logging, petroleum engineer...
 
Interpreting geophysical well logs
Interpreting geophysical well logsInterpreting geophysical well logs
Interpreting geophysical well logs
 
Well log _the_bore_hole_image_
Well log _the_bore_hole_image_Well log _the_bore_hole_image_
Well log _the_bore_hole_image_
 
well logging project report_ongc project student
well logging project report_ongc project studentwell logging project report_ongc project student
well logging project report_ongc project student
 
Nuclear magnetic resonance logging
Nuclear magnetic resonance loggingNuclear magnetic resonance logging
Nuclear magnetic resonance logging
 
4.resistivity log
4.resistivity log4.resistivity log
4.resistivity log
 
Well Logging: 03 SP log 01
Well Logging: 03 SP log 01Well Logging: 03 SP log 01
Well Logging: 03 SP log 01
 
Resistivity log
Resistivity logResistivity log
Resistivity log
 

Viewers also liked

Monitor drilling performance
Monitor drilling performanceMonitor drilling performance
Monitor drilling performanceAndi Anriansyah
 
Sedimentology application in petroleum industry
Sedimentology application in petroleum industrySedimentology application in petroleum industry
Sedimentology application in petroleum industryAndi Anriansyah
 
EOR (feasibility to execution)
EOR (feasibility to execution)EOR (feasibility to execution)
EOR (feasibility to execution)Andi Anriansyah
 
Production Recapitulation Template
Production Recapitulation TemplateProduction Recapitulation Template
Production Recapitulation TemplateAndi Anriansyah
 
Structural geology application in Petroleum industry
Structural geology application in Petroleum industryStructural geology application in Petroleum industry
Structural geology application in Petroleum industryAndi Anriansyah
 
STIMULATION HUFF & PUFF AND CONTINUES INJECTION USING FORMULATED SURFACTANT
STIMULATION HUFF & PUFF AND CONTINUES INJECTION USING FORMULATED SURFACTANT STIMULATION HUFF & PUFF AND CONTINUES INJECTION USING FORMULATED SURFACTANT
STIMULATION HUFF & PUFF AND CONTINUES INJECTION USING FORMULATED SURFACTANT Andi Anriansyah
 

Viewers also liked (7)

Monitor drilling performance
Monitor drilling performanceMonitor drilling performance
Monitor drilling performance
 
Petrophysic cont
Petrophysic contPetrophysic cont
Petrophysic cont
 
Sedimentology application in petroleum industry
Sedimentology application in petroleum industrySedimentology application in petroleum industry
Sedimentology application in petroleum industry
 
EOR (feasibility to execution)
EOR (feasibility to execution)EOR (feasibility to execution)
EOR (feasibility to execution)
 
Production Recapitulation Template
Production Recapitulation TemplateProduction Recapitulation Template
Production Recapitulation Template
 
Structural geology application in Petroleum industry
Structural geology application in Petroleum industryStructural geology application in Petroleum industry
Structural geology application in Petroleum industry
 
STIMULATION HUFF & PUFF AND CONTINUES INJECTION USING FORMULATED SURFACTANT
STIMULATION HUFF & PUFF AND CONTINUES INJECTION USING FORMULATED SURFACTANT STIMULATION HUFF & PUFF AND CONTINUES INJECTION USING FORMULATED SURFACTANT
STIMULATION HUFF & PUFF AND CONTINUES INJECTION USING FORMULATED SURFACTANT
 

Similar to Petrophysicist Guide to Log Interpretation

FORMATION EVALUATION -V V I.pdf
FORMATION EVALUATION -V V I.pdfFORMATION EVALUATION -V V I.pdf
FORMATION EVALUATION -V V I.pdfWahidMia
 
science behind well logging_dileep p allavarapu
science behind well logging_dileep p allavarapuscience behind well logging_dileep p allavarapu
science behind well logging_dileep p allavarapuknigh7
 
well logging tools and exercise_dileep p allavarapu
well logging tools and exercise_dileep p allavarapuwell logging tools and exercise_dileep p allavarapu
well logging tools and exercise_dileep p allavarapuknigh7
 
Basic well logging design
Basic well logging designBasic well logging design
Basic well logging designVahid Ahmadov
 
Well Log Interpretation and Petrophysical Analisis in [Autosaved]
Well Log Interpretation and Petrophysical Analisis in [Autosaved]Well Log Interpretation and Petrophysical Analisis in [Autosaved]
Well Log Interpretation and Petrophysical Analisis in [Autosaved]Ridho Nanda Pratama
 
Well Log Analysis
Well Log AnalysisWell Log Analysis
Well Log AnalysisSanjan Das
 
Q921 log lec3 v1
Q921 log lec3 v1Q921 log lec3 v1
Q921 log lec3 v1AFATous
 
geophysical_logs4.ppt
geophysical_logs4.pptgeophysical_logs4.ppt
geophysical_logs4.pptzeidali3
 
Avo ppt (Amplitude Variation with Offset)
Avo ppt (Amplitude Variation with Offset)Avo ppt (Amplitude Variation with Offset)
Avo ppt (Amplitude Variation with Offset)Haseeb Ahmed
 
Petrophysics 14 resistivity logs
Petrophysics 14 resistivity logsPetrophysics 14 resistivity logs
Petrophysics 14 resistivity logsAllison Shade
 
Calculating porosity and water saturation
Calculating porosity and water saturationCalculating porosity and water saturation
Calculating porosity and water saturationhaider Shabaan Khalil
 
Spontaneous (SP) log
Spontaneous (SP) logSpontaneous (SP) log
Spontaneous (SP) logNisar Almani
 
Q922+log+l04 v1
Q922+log+l04 v1Q922+log+l04 v1
Q922+log+l04 v1AFATous
 
Reservoir Geophysics : Brian Russell Lecture 2
Reservoir Geophysics : Brian Russell Lecture 2Reservoir Geophysics : Brian Russell Lecture 2
Reservoir Geophysics : Brian Russell Lecture 2Ali Osman Öncel
 
Openhole wireline logging and interpretation schlum. report-33-46
Openhole wireline logging and interpretation schlum.  report-33-46Openhole wireline logging and interpretation schlum.  report-33-46
Openhole wireline logging and interpretation schlum. report-33-46AR MARWEN
 

Similar to Petrophysicist Guide to Log Interpretation (20)

FORMATION EVALUATION -V V I.pdf
FORMATION EVALUATION -V V I.pdfFORMATION EVALUATION -V V I.pdf
FORMATION EVALUATION -V V I.pdf
 
science behind well logging_dileep p allavarapu
science behind well logging_dileep p allavarapuscience behind well logging_dileep p allavarapu
science behind well logging_dileep p allavarapu
 
well logging tools and exercise_dileep p allavarapu
well logging tools and exercise_dileep p allavarapuwell logging tools and exercise_dileep p allavarapu
well logging tools and exercise_dileep p allavarapu
 
Wll logging
Wll loggingWll logging
Wll logging
 
Basic well logging design
Basic well logging designBasic well logging design
Basic well logging design
 
Well Log Interpretation and Petrophysical Analisis in [Autosaved]
Well Log Interpretation and Petrophysical Analisis in [Autosaved]Well Log Interpretation and Petrophysical Analisis in [Autosaved]
Well Log Interpretation and Petrophysical Analisis in [Autosaved]
 
Well Log Analysis
Well Log AnalysisWell Log Analysis
Well Log Analysis
 
Q921 log lec3 v1
Q921 log lec3 v1Q921 log lec3 v1
Q921 log lec3 v1
 
geophysical_logs4.ppt
geophysical_logs4.pptgeophysical_logs4.ppt
geophysical_logs4.ppt
 
Avo ppt (Amplitude Variation with Offset)
Avo ppt (Amplitude Variation with Offset)Avo ppt (Amplitude Variation with Offset)
Avo ppt (Amplitude Variation with Offset)
 
Basic Well Logging Design.pdf
Basic Well Logging Design.pdfBasic Well Logging Design.pdf
Basic Well Logging Design.pdf
 
Petrophysics 14 resistivity logs
Petrophysics 14 resistivity logsPetrophysics 14 resistivity logs
Petrophysics 14 resistivity logs
 
Calculating porosity and water saturation
Calculating porosity and water saturationCalculating porosity and water saturation
Calculating porosity and water saturation
 
Spontaneous (SP) log
Spontaneous (SP) logSpontaneous (SP) log
Spontaneous (SP) log
 
Q922+log+l04 v1
Q922+log+l04 v1Q922+log+l04 v1
Q922+log+l04 v1
 
Reservoir Geophysics : Brian Russell Lecture 2
Reservoir Geophysics : Brian Russell Lecture 2Reservoir Geophysics : Brian Russell Lecture 2
Reservoir Geophysics : Brian Russell Lecture 2
 
Openhole wireline logging and interpretation schlum. report-33-46
Openhole wireline logging and interpretation schlum.  report-33-46Openhole wireline logging and interpretation schlum.  report-33-46
Openhole wireline logging and interpretation schlum. report-33-46
 
Intro_Logging.ppt
Intro_Logging.pptIntro_Logging.ppt
Intro_Logging.ppt
 
Well logging
Well loggingWell logging
Well logging
 
Geophysical well logging
Geophysical well loggingGeophysical well logging
Geophysical well logging
 

More from Andi Anriansyah

Garmin BaseCamp & Google Earth (From Tracking to Monitoring)
Garmin BaseCamp & Google Earth (From Tracking to Monitoring)Garmin BaseCamp & Google Earth (From Tracking to Monitoring)
Garmin BaseCamp & Google Earth (From Tracking to Monitoring)Andi Anriansyah
 
Rock Mass Classification
Rock Mass ClassificationRock Mass Classification
Rock Mass ClassificationAndi Anriansyah
 
Petroleum Operations Geology - An Outline
Petroleum Operations Geology - An OutlinePetroleum Operations Geology - An Outline
Petroleum Operations Geology - An OutlineAndi Anriansyah
 
30 Best drone 2019 on geekbuying overview
30 Best drone 2019 on geekbuying overview30 Best drone 2019 on geekbuying overview
30 Best drone 2019 on geekbuying overviewAndi Anriansyah
 
Seismic interpretation - Fluvial Deltaic System
Seismic interpretation - Fluvial Deltaic SystemSeismic interpretation - Fluvial Deltaic System
Seismic interpretation - Fluvial Deltaic SystemAndi Anriansyah
 
SUBSURFACE EVALUATION FULL SCALE EOR WATER FLOODING A - M FAULT ANTICLINE SHA...
SUBSURFACE EVALUATION FULL SCALE EOR WATER FLOODING A - M FAULT ANTICLINE SHA...SUBSURFACE EVALUATION FULL SCALE EOR WATER FLOODING A - M FAULT ANTICLINE SHA...
SUBSURFACE EVALUATION FULL SCALE EOR WATER FLOODING A - M FAULT ANTICLINE SHA...Andi Anriansyah
 
PRODUCTION OPTIMIZATION USING SURFACTANT STIMULATION HUFF & PUFF AND CONTINUE...
PRODUCTION OPTIMIZATION USING SURFACTANT STIMULATION HUFF & PUFF AND CONTINUE...PRODUCTION OPTIMIZATION USING SURFACTANT STIMULATION HUFF & PUFF AND CONTINUE...
PRODUCTION OPTIMIZATION USING SURFACTANT STIMULATION HUFF & PUFF AND CONTINUE...Andi Anriansyah
 
Petroleum Appraisal & Development Overview
Petroleum Appraisal & Development OverviewPetroleum Appraisal & Development Overview
Petroleum Appraisal & Development OverviewAndi Anriansyah
 
Petroleum Artificial Lift Overview
Petroleum Artificial Lift OverviewPetroleum Artificial Lift Overview
Petroleum Artificial Lift OverviewAndi Anriansyah
 
Petroleum Drilling Overview
Petroleum Drilling  OverviewPetroleum Drilling  Overview
Petroleum Drilling OverviewAndi Anriansyah
 
Petroleum Exploration Overview
Petroleum Exploration OverviewPetroleum Exploration Overview
Petroleum Exploration OverviewAndi Anriansyah
 
Petroleum Formation Evaluation Overview
Petroleum Formation Evaluation OverviewPetroleum Formation Evaluation Overview
Petroleum Formation Evaluation OverviewAndi Anriansyah
 
Petroleum reservoir performance overview
Petroleum reservoir performance overviewPetroleum reservoir performance overview
Petroleum reservoir performance overviewAndi Anriansyah
 
Petroleum well completion overview
Petroleum well completion overviewPetroleum well completion overview
Petroleum well completion overviewAndi Anriansyah
 
Introduction - Artificial lift
Introduction - Artificial liftIntroduction - Artificial lift
Introduction - Artificial liftAndi Anriansyah
 
Introduction - Well completion
Introduction - Well completionIntroduction - Well completion
Introduction - Well completionAndi Anriansyah
 
Summary subsurface mapping
Summary subsurface mappingSummary subsurface mapping
Summary subsurface mappingAndi Anriansyah
 
An introduction to oil and gas production
An introduction to oil and gas productionAn introduction to oil and gas production
An introduction to oil and gas productionAndi Anriansyah
 
WELL COMPLETION, WELL INTERVENTION/ STIMULATION, AND WORKOVER
WELL COMPLETION, WELL INTERVENTION/ STIMULATION, AND WORKOVERWELL COMPLETION, WELL INTERVENTION/ STIMULATION, AND WORKOVER
WELL COMPLETION, WELL INTERVENTION/ STIMULATION, AND WORKOVERAndi Anriansyah
 

More from Andi Anriansyah (20)

Garmin BaseCamp & Google Earth (From Tracking to Monitoring)
Garmin BaseCamp & Google Earth (From Tracking to Monitoring)Garmin BaseCamp & Google Earth (From Tracking to Monitoring)
Garmin BaseCamp & Google Earth (From Tracking to Monitoring)
 
Rock Mass Classification
Rock Mass ClassificationRock Mass Classification
Rock Mass Classification
 
Petroleum Operations Geology - An Outline
Petroleum Operations Geology - An OutlinePetroleum Operations Geology - An Outline
Petroleum Operations Geology - An Outline
 
30 Best drone 2019 on geekbuying overview
30 Best drone 2019 on geekbuying overview30 Best drone 2019 on geekbuying overview
30 Best drone 2019 on geekbuying overview
 
Seismic interpretation - Fluvial Deltaic System
Seismic interpretation - Fluvial Deltaic SystemSeismic interpretation - Fluvial Deltaic System
Seismic interpretation - Fluvial Deltaic System
 
SUBSURFACE EVALUATION FULL SCALE EOR WATER FLOODING A - M FAULT ANTICLINE SHA...
SUBSURFACE EVALUATION FULL SCALE EOR WATER FLOODING A - M FAULT ANTICLINE SHA...SUBSURFACE EVALUATION FULL SCALE EOR WATER FLOODING A - M FAULT ANTICLINE SHA...
SUBSURFACE EVALUATION FULL SCALE EOR WATER FLOODING A - M FAULT ANTICLINE SHA...
 
PRODUCTION OPTIMIZATION USING SURFACTANT STIMULATION HUFF & PUFF AND CONTINUE...
PRODUCTION OPTIMIZATION USING SURFACTANT STIMULATION HUFF & PUFF AND CONTINUE...PRODUCTION OPTIMIZATION USING SURFACTANT STIMULATION HUFF & PUFF AND CONTINUE...
PRODUCTION OPTIMIZATION USING SURFACTANT STIMULATION HUFF & PUFF AND CONTINUE...
 
Petroleum Appraisal & Development Overview
Petroleum Appraisal & Development OverviewPetroleum Appraisal & Development Overview
Petroleum Appraisal & Development Overview
 
Petroleum Artificial Lift Overview
Petroleum Artificial Lift OverviewPetroleum Artificial Lift Overview
Petroleum Artificial Lift Overview
 
Petroleum Drilling Overview
Petroleum Drilling  OverviewPetroleum Drilling  Overview
Petroleum Drilling Overview
 
Petroleum Exploration Overview
Petroleum Exploration OverviewPetroleum Exploration Overview
Petroleum Exploration Overview
 
Petroleum Formation Evaluation Overview
Petroleum Formation Evaluation OverviewPetroleum Formation Evaluation Overview
Petroleum Formation Evaluation Overview
 
Petroleum reservoir performance overview
Petroleum reservoir performance overviewPetroleum reservoir performance overview
Petroleum reservoir performance overview
 
Petroleum well completion overview
Petroleum well completion overviewPetroleum well completion overview
Petroleum well completion overview
 
Introduction - Artificial lift
Introduction - Artificial liftIntroduction - Artificial lift
Introduction - Artificial lift
 
Introduction - Well completion
Introduction - Well completionIntroduction - Well completion
Introduction - Well completion
 
Summary subsurface mapping
Summary subsurface mappingSummary subsurface mapping
Summary subsurface mapping
 
Petroleum economics
Petroleum economicsPetroleum economics
Petroleum economics
 
An introduction to oil and gas production
An introduction to oil and gas productionAn introduction to oil and gas production
An introduction to oil and gas production
 
WELL COMPLETION, WELL INTERVENTION/ STIMULATION, AND WORKOVER
WELL COMPLETION, WELL INTERVENTION/ STIMULATION, AND WORKOVERWELL COMPLETION, WELL INTERVENTION/ STIMULATION, AND WORKOVER
WELL COMPLETION, WELL INTERVENTION/ STIMULATION, AND WORKOVER
 

Recently uploaded

pipeline in computer architecture design
pipeline in computer architecture  designpipeline in computer architecture  design
pipeline in computer architecture designssuser87fa0c1
 
HARMONY IN THE NATURE AND EXISTENCE - Unit-IV
HARMONY IN THE NATURE AND EXISTENCE - Unit-IVHARMONY IN THE NATURE AND EXISTENCE - Unit-IV
HARMONY IN THE NATURE AND EXISTENCE - Unit-IVRajaP95
 
Oxy acetylene welding presentation note.
Oxy acetylene welding presentation note.Oxy acetylene welding presentation note.
Oxy acetylene welding presentation note.eptoze12
 
DATA ANALYTICS PPT definition usage example
DATA ANALYTICS PPT definition usage exampleDATA ANALYTICS PPT definition usage example
DATA ANALYTICS PPT definition usage examplePragyanshuParadkar1
 
main PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfid
main PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfidmain PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfid
main PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfidNikhilNagaraju
 
Risk Assessment For Installation of Drainage Pipes.pdf
Risk Assessment For Installation of Drainage Pipes.pdfRisk Assessment For Installation of Drainage Pipes.pdf
Risk Assessment For Installation of Drainage Pipes.pdfROCENODodongVILLACER
 
Work Experience-Dalton Park.pptxfvvvvvvv
Work Experience-Dalton Park.pptxfvvvvvvvWork Experience-Dalton Park.pptxfvvvvvvv
Work Experience-Dalton Park.pptxfvvvvvvvLewisJB
 
Heart Disease Prediction using machine learning.pptx
Heart Disease Prediction using machine learning.pptxHeart Disease Prediction using machine learning.pptx
Heart Disease Prediction using machine learning.pptxPoojaBan
 
Sachpazis Costas: Geotechnical Engineering: A student's Perspective Introduction
Sachpazis Costas: Geotechnical Engineering: A student's Perspective IntroductionSachpazis Costas: Geotechnical Engineering: A student's Perspective Introduction
Sachpazis Costas: Geotechnical Engineering: A student's Perspective IntroductionDr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Gfe Mayur Vihar Call Girls Service WhatsApp -> 9999965857 Available 24x7 ^ De...
Gfe Mayur Vihar Call Girls Service WhatsApp -> 9999965857 Available 24x7 ^ De...Gfe Mayur Vihar Call Girls Service WhatsApp -> 9999965857 Available 24x7 ^ De...
Gfe Mayur Vihar Call Girls Service WhatsApp -> 9999965857 Available 24x7 ^ De...srsj9000
 
Effects of rheological properties on mixing
Effects of rheological properties on mixingEffects of rheological properties on mixing
Effects of rheological properties on mixingviprabot1
 
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning UNIT III notes and Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning UNIT III notes and Question bank .pdfCCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning UNIT III notes and Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning UNIT III notes and Question bank .pdfAsst.prof M.Gokilavani
 
Artificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptx
Artificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptxArtificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptx
Artificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptxbritheesh05
 
Decoding Kotlin - Your guide to solving the mysterious in Kotlin.pptx
Decoding Kotlin - Your guide to solving the mysterious in Kotlin.pptxDecoding Kotlin - Your guide to solving the mysterious in Kotlin.pptx
Decoding Kotlin - Your guide to solving the mysterious in Kotlin.pptxJoão Esperancinha
 
Biology for Computer Engineers Course Handout.pptx
Biology for Computer Engineers Course Handout.pptxBiology for Computer Engineers Course Handout.pptx
Biology for Computer Engineers Course Handout.pptxDeepakSakkari2
 
GDSC ASEB Gen AI study jams presentation
GDSC ASEB Gen AI study jams presentationGDSC ASEB Gen AI study jams presentation
GDSC ASEB Gen AI study jams presentationGDSCAESB
 
Call Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile service
Call Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile serviceCall Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile service
Call Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile servicerehmti665
 
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdfCCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdfAsst.prof M.Gokilavani
 
VICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ - Planetary Defender on NASA's Double Asteroid Redirec...
VICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ - Planetary Defender on NASA's Double Asteroid Redirec...VICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ - Planetary Defender on NASA's Double Asteroid Redirec...
VICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ - Planetary Defender on NASA's Double Asteroid Redirec...VICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ
 

Recently uploaded (20)

pipeline in computer architecture design
pipeline in computer architecture  designpipeline in computer architecture  design
pipeline in computer architecture design
 
HARMONY IN THE NATURE AND EXISTENCE - Unit-IV
HARMONY IN THE NATURE AND EXISTENCE - Unit-IVHARMONY IN THE NATURE AND EXISTENCE - Unit-IV
HARMONY IN THE NATURE AND EXISTENCE - Unit-IV
 
Oxy acetylene welding presentation note.
Oxy acetylene welding presentation note.Oxy acetylene welding presentation note.
Oxy acetylene welding presentation note.
 
DATA ANALYTICS PPT definition usage example
DATA ANALYTICS PPT definition usage exampleDATA ANALYTICS PPT definition usage example
DATA ANALYTICS PPT definition usage example
 
main PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfid
main PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfidmain PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfid
main PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfid
 
Risk Assessment For Installation of Drainage Pipes.pdf
Risk Assessment For Installation of Drainage Pipes.pdfRisk Assessment For Installation of Drainage Pipes.pdf
Risk Assessment For Installation of Drainage Pipes.pdf
 
Work Experience-Dalton Park.pptxfvvvvvvv
Work Experience-Dalton Park.pptxfvvvvvvvWork Experience-Dalton Park.pptxfvvvvvvv
Work Experience-Dalton Park.pptxfvvvvvvv
 
Heart Disease Prediction using machine learning.pptx
Heart Disease Prediction using machine learning.pptxHeart Disease Prediction using machine learning.pptx
Heart Disease Prediction using machine learning.pptx
 
Sachpazis Costas: Geotechnical Engineering: A student's Perspective Introduction
Sachpazis Costas: Geotechnical Engineering: A student's Perspective IntroductionSachpazis Costas: Geotechnical Engineering: A student's Perspective Introduction
Sachpazis Costas: Geotechnical Engineering: A student's Perspective Introduction
 
Gfe Mayur Vihar Call Girls Service WhatsApp -> 9999965857 Available 24x7 ^ De...
Gfe Mayur Vihar Call Girls Service WhatsApp -> 9999965857 Available 24x7 ^ De...Gfe Mayur Vihar Call Girls Service WhatsApp -> 9999965857 Available 24x7 ^ De...
Gfe Mayur Vihar Call Girls Service WhatsApp -> 9999965857 Available 24x7 ^ De...
 
Effects of rheological properties on mixing
Effects of rheological properties on mixingEffects of rheological properties on mixing
Effects of rheological properties on mixing
 
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning UNIT III notes and Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning UNIT III notes and Question bank .pdfCCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning UNIT III notes and Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning UNIT III notes and Question bank .pdf
 
Artificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptx
Artificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptxArtificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptx
Artificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptx
 
🔝9953056974🔝!!-YOUNG call girls in Rajendra Nagar Escort rvice Shot 2000 nigh...
🔝9953056974🔝!!-YOUNG call girls in Rajendra Nagar Escort rvice Shot 2000 nigh...🔝9953056974🔝!!-YOUNG call girls in Rajendra Nagar Escort rvice Shot 2000 nigh...
🔝9953056974🔝!!-YOUNG call girls in Rajendra Nagar Escort rvice Shot 2000 nigh...
 
Decoding Kotlin - Your guide to solving the mysterious in Kotlin.pptx
Decoding Kotlin - Your guide to solving the mysterious in Kotlin.pptxDecoding Kotlin - Your guide to solving the mysterious in Kotlin.pptx
Decoding Kotlin - Your guide to solving the mysterious in Kotlin.pptx
 
Biology for Computer Engineers Course Handout.pptx
Biology for Computer Engineers Course Handout.pptxBiology for Computer Engineers Course Handout.pptx
Biology for Computer Engineers Course Handout.pptx
 
GDSC ASEB Gen AI study jams presentation
GDSC ASEB Gen AI study jams presentationGDSC ASEB Gen AI study jams presentation
GDSC ASEB Gen AI study jams presentation
 
Call Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile service
Call Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile serviceCall Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile service
Call Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile service
 
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdfCCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdf
 
VICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ - Planetary Defender on NASA's Double Asteroid Redirec...
VICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ - Planetary Defender on NASA's Double Asteroid Redirec...VICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ - Planetary Defender on NASA's Double Asteroid Redirec...
VICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ - Planetary Defender on NASA's Double Asteroid Redirec...
 

Petrophysicist Guide to Log Interpretation

  • 2. PETROPHYSICAL INTERPRETATION:  Logging Environment & HC EVALUATION  Logs Show Permeable Zone . A. Spontaneous Potential (SP) B. Gamma Ray (GR)  Logs measure Formation resistivity A. Log Induction B. Log Lateral  Logs measure Formation porosity A. Log Neutron B. Log Densities C. Log Sonic  Clean Formation Evaluation  Shaly Formation Evaluation
  • 5. Drilling Process:  Mud Pressure (Pm)  hydrostatic fluid Pressure in pore Formation (Pr) Differ to :  Avoid “Blowout”  Push Liquid to Formation (invasion proses).  invasion Proses make solid material (mud cake).  Liquid in to formation Mud Fitrate LOGGING ENVIRONMENT
  • 6. LOGGING ENVIRONMENT Nomenclature: Borehole: Rm = Resistivity of mud. Rmc = Resistivity of mud cake. Flushed Zone: Rmf = Resistivity of mud filtrate. RXO = Resistivity of flushed zone. SXO = Water Saturation of flushed zone. Uninvaded or Virgin Zone: RT = True resistivity of formation. RW = Resistivity of formation water. SW = Formation Water Saturation. RS = Resistivity of adjacent bed or shoulder bed resistivity. di = Diameter of invasion. dh = Borehole diameter. h = Bed thickness.
  • 7. 1. “Flushed zone” with diameter (df.) Contain “Mud Filtrate” (Rm ) Contain “Residual Hydrocarbon” Has Rock Resistivity Rxo. Thick~ 6 inches, less or more 2. “Transition zone” with diameter (dj.) Several feet. 3. Undisturbed zone: Has Water Formation Resistivity (Rw), Rock Resistivity (Rt), and Water Saturation (Sw) .
  • 9. A. Water Formation resistivity, Rw Archie first measure water Formation resistivity in Tank. “Measure flow I and voltage V, then water Formation resistivity , Rw” formulate as follows: V Rw = ----- [ ohmm] I B. Rock Resistivity, Ro. Archie analyse the rock. Begin with porosity calculation Ø. Then the pore filled with water formation which the resistivity was measured (Sw = 1). On the experiment is Rw. therefore : V Ro = --------- [ ohmm] I2 Apparently Ro > Rw Archie experiment
  • 10. Archie repeat the experiment with different water salinity formation. Resulting: Ro1 = F Rw1 Ro2 = F Rw2 Ro3 = F Rw3 It seen that rock Resistivity (Ro) equal linearly with Water Formation Resistivity (Rw). Ro = F Rw (1) whereF = Formation Resistivity Factor. The experiment uses F & Ø data for about 300 rock sample. The Value F & Ø plotted on axis and ordinate mathematically as follows: 1 F = ----------- (2) Ø m m = Cementation exponent, m = 1.3 - 2.2 Archie experiment
  • 11. THE RELATION OF FORMATION RESISTIVITY FACTOR (F) VERSUS PERMEABILITY (K) AND POROSITY (Ø)
  • 12. C. Rock Resistivity (Rt). Due to search oil, then the rock on experiment begin with filled with oil and water. Addition oil mean Sw smaller than one: Sw < 1 The measurement resulting Rock Resistivity ( Rt ) Where: Rt bigger thanRo, Rt equal linearly with Ro. Rt = I Ro (3) Were I = Resistivity index “ Smaller Sw mean more oil in the pore & bigger Rt bigger resistivity index (I).” So I andSw relation as follows: 1 I = ----------- (4) Sw n where n = Saturation exponent, about = 2
  • 13. From above, can be formulated as follows : F. Rw Sw n = ------------------- (5) Rt The formula known as Archie Formula. Principal Logging Measurement: Measure Reservoir Resistivity (R1). Measure Water Resistivity (R2). if (R1) > (R2), then there is HC in the reservoir (R1) .
  • 14. Calculate Volume HC in Reservoir HC occurrence in pore can be measure with electrical Formation resistivity. Assumes: Rock Matrix cannot flow the electrical current. it mean electrical current fully done throgh water on pore Due to the water contain NaCl. So the rock contain water with High Conductivity (orlow resistivity). 1 Note : Conductivity = ----------------- Resistivity
  • 15. Archie formula as follows: F x Rw Ro Swn = ---------- = ----- Rt Rt If n = 2, Ro Sw =  -------- Rt This formula can be use if we have zone with containing water (water bearing), with no porosity data
  • 16. For Porosity value that usually seen on logging, Formation Factor (F) calculated as follows: 1 on limestone: F = ---------  2 0.81 0.62 on sandstone: F = ------ or F = ------  2  2.15 wherea = cementation factor
  • 18. Water Formation Resistivity (Rw) : Water Formation Resistivity measurement, Rw, can be done using Archie formula in zone containing water (seefig 2-2) : Zone D is water zone due to low Resistivity value , that is Rt = 0.3 ohmm (assumes Sw = 1) and the Porosity is about 0.35 F Rw Sw2 = 1 = --------- 0.3 Rw calculated about 0.045 ohmm.
  • 19. Formation Evaluation conducted with use 3 log type:  Log show Permeable Zone. Spontaneous Potential Gamma Ray  Log measure Formation Resistivity Deep Induction Deep Laterolog  Log measure Porosity. Density Neutron Sonic
  • 20. Finding Production zone? Permeable Zone use Log SP or GR : “Shale base line” on the right show shale (impermeable and cannot be produced). Deflection SP to left shows “Clean Zones” (sand or limestone) may be productive. Log-log Resistivity : High resistivity shows HC or “tight zones” or zones low porosity. Low resistivity shows containing water. Log-log Porosity Shows zone with pore or “ tight ”.
  • 22. Log SP APPLICATION :  To differentiate permeable and non-permeable of rock.  To “well to well” Correlation.  As reference of depth for all logs.  To define layer limit.  To calculate Rw value.  As clay indicator. Work Principal :  An electrode insert to bore hole then record the electrical potential at any point with reference on surface electrical potential  So the SP log is different of potential record between an moveable electrode in borehole and another electrode on surface  The Mud must conductive.  Logging speed may 1500 m/hr.
  • 24. Figure 1. Origin Log SP Measurement
  • 25. Figure 9. Figure 10.Figure 8. Figure 7. Origin Log SP Measurement
  • 26. SP Deflection.  The SP curve constant but deflect to another level if pass the limit of the different formation that differ.  Rock surface that permeable containing water, then  If Rmf > Rw SP deflect to left (SP negatif).  If Rmf < Rw SP deflect right (SP positif).  There is no SP deflection on rock surface that non-permeabel or shale surface.
  • 27. Figure 1. Figure 2. LOG SP MEASUREMENT
  • 29. SP Log Presentation: SP curve presented in I with millivolt unit. There is no Absolut scale, but use 10 mV per small division. Usually use scale –80 to 20 mV
  • 30. GR Log ( Gamma Ray )
  • 31. Application Log GR.  Standard Gamma Ray Application:  As main Reference to all run logging.  To “well to well” correlation.  Differentiate permeable and nonpermeable zone .  Calculate volume clay.  Natural Gamma Ray Tool (NGT) Application:  To detect, recognize and evaluate radioactive minerals .  Recognize the clay type and calculate volume clay.  Permeable zone that may contain Uranium much more than less permeable zone.  Uranium reading on NGT log sometime useful as clue the existing fluid movement.
  • 32. Principal work of GR Log.  Gamma Rays that naturally come: This Gamma Ray comes naturally in rocks and has relatively low energy. Device to measure gamma ray natural are: 1. Standard Gamma ray Tool (SGT) 2. Natural Gamma Spectrometry Tool (NGT)  SGT measure all natural GR.  NGT beside measure all GR, also measure GR energy and define the concentration of 3 type radioactive element that usually in nature : Uranium (Ur235/238) Potassium (isotope 19K40) and Thorium (Th232)
  • 33. Figure 2. Figure 3. Type radioactive element
  • 34. Gamma Ray (GR) Specifications Measurement Range : Gamma API Units : 0 to 400 API Measurement Accuracy : Gamma API Units : ± 1 API Maxium Ratings : Pressure : 20,000 psi (138,000 kPa) Temperature : 350 o F (177 o C) Dimensions : Tool Length : 4.4 ft (2.30 m) Tool Weight 80 lb (36 kg) Maximum Diameter : 3.5 in (89 mm) The Gamma Ray measures natural formation radioactivity, making it an excellent tool for correlation purposes over the life of a well
  • 35. Induced Gamma Ray Tools: The devices putted radioactive sources that transmit gamma ray with high energy. Example density log tools: FDC - Formation Density Compensated LDT – Litho Density Tool Depth of Investigation and Vertical Resolution. Depth of Investigation SGT about 10 inci. Depth of Investigation NGT about 15 inci. Vertical Resolution SGT about 10 inci Vertical Resolution NGT about 15 inci.
  • 36. Presentation kurva GR The gamma ray curve presented in Track I. Common scale use 0-200 API. Can reduce to 0-150 API or 0- 120 API if gamma ray activity low. The NGT curve presented: ○ SGR: Total Gamma Ray. ○ CGR: total GR less by Uranium ○ Ratio Th/K ○ Ratio Th/U
  • 37. LQC dan Corrections In free shale Rock, log GR recording low value about 20-30 API. In “Shaly Formation” log GR has value 80 to 300 API. Environmental corrections Large borehole and much weight mud can reduce the value of GR rock measurement. “centered” tools in borehole will receive gamma ray less than the GR tools that “eccentered”. GR devices that survey in well contain KCl mud will accept GR much more due to high Potassium content. Therefore the correction as parameter: Hole size & mud weight. Correction KCl content Casing size & Casing weight cement.
  • 38. Example of correction GR As bore hole  Find GR value after conduct correction if value log GR = 32 API,  hole size (dhole) =12 inci,  mud weight (Wmud) = 9.2 lb/gal,  tool diameter (dsonde) = 3 3/8”, as survey “centered”.  Calculate: t = Wmud x [2.54(dhole) – 2.54(dsonde)]/[8.345 x 2] = 12 g/cm2  Then follow redline (chart) with input t = 12 g/cm2 for gain correction factor 1.2  GRcorrected = 1.2 x GRlog = 38.4 API
  • 39. Interpretation  Percentage shale in rocks calculated by formula: (GRlog – GRclean) Vshale = --------------------------------- (GRshale – GRclean)  Survey by NGT tool give curve Uranium, Potassium and Thorium curve . Figure Mineral Identification from Spectral Gamma Ray
  • 43.  The Main Basic Formula Interpretation is: F. Rw Sw2 = ---------- Rt  The most important Input is Rt, uninvaded zone resistivity .  With invasion then logging has create 3 type Resistivity tools: Deep investigation. Medium investigation. Shallow investigation.  Resistivity a liquid always presented with Temperatur. Example: Rmf = 0.30 ohm-m @ 80 degF Rw = 0.10 ohm-m @ 120 degF  from resistivity data and temperature, can be found liquid salinity with Chart Gen-9. Resistivity Logs
  • 44. Resistivity of NaCl solution (Schlumberger chart GEN-9)
  • 46. Table 4-1 above is Resistivity tools classification until 1987 classification based on radius of investigation : Deep : 3 + feet Medium : 1.5 - 3 feet Shallow : 1- 6 inches. all curve deep, medium and shallow recorded use electrodes or coils putted on mandrel silindris, and placed more less centralized in borehole. Microresistivity devices use sensor that putted on pad that forced close in wall of borehole wall as survey conducted.
  • 47.  Log Induction worked in: Fresh mud Resistivity formation < 200 ohm-m Rmf/Rw > 2.0  Log Lateral will better work in: Salt Mud Resistivity formation > 200 ohm-m Rmf/Rw < 2.0 Large borehole >12 in. also deep invasion (>40in.)
  • 48. Log Induction & Lateral Figure 1.
  • 50. Principal Work.  Induction devices to define resistivity with measure rocks conductivity. In transmitter flowed by high frequency current with constant amplitude that will attain magnet field in rocks.  The magnet fields attain Eddy current or Foucault current in other name called ground loop.  The value of the current equal to rocks conductivity
  • 51. Simultaneous triple induction (STI) SPHERICALLY FOCUSSED RESISTIVITY SECTION • Electrode System : Integrated into mandrel • Measurements Range : 0,2 to 2000 ohm-in • Outputs : V0 and I0 • Accuracy : 5 % of reading • Inputs : Cal, Zero, Return select • Full Vertical Resolution : 25 in (64 cm) Accurate resistivity measurement with high vertical resolution is vital for the determination of true formation resistivity and flushed zone resistivity, two essential parameters of formation evaluation Open Hole Services
  • 52. Depth of Investigation & Vertical Resolution.
  • 53. LATEROLOG – INDUCTION LOGS Better use Induction than Laterolog if 1. Rmf/Rw > 2.5 2. Rt < 200 ohmm 3. Thickness > 10ft If porosity bellow Rw but Rmf/Rw still > 2.5 then Laterolog should be used
  • 54. Presentation Log Induction.  The deep Induction log presented on track 3-4 with logarithmic scale, as dashed curve with mnemonic ILD.  The medium induction log also on track 3-4 with logarithmic scale, as dashed curve with mnemonic ILM.  The shallow focused log also on track 3-4 with logarithmic scale, as continue curve with mnemonic SFLU (spherically focused log).  logarithmic Scale usually 4 cycles, from 0.2 s/d 2000 with unit [ohmm].
  • 55. LQC / Interpretation  Due to mud filtrate, therefore ILM between ILD and SFLU.  ILD<ILM<SFLU Profile must shown on log Induction, because of this condition Rmf/Rw > 2.5 fulfilled. Figure 4.
  • 56. Correction Log Induction.  Induction log need to be corrected with:  Borehole corrections: mud resistivity and borehole size (figure 11)  Tool standoff corrections (figure 11)  Bed thickness and shoulder bed corrections (fig.12)  Invasion corrections (figure 13)  SFLU log also need to be corrected as mud resistivity and borehole size. (figure 10)
  • 60. Application Log Lateral. Laterolog device designed for measure rock resistivity that drilled with salty mud or very conductive mud also used for detect zones that contain HC. Prinsipal work Log Lateral. Sonde on resistivity tools has bucking electrode to focus survey current and insist to flow in vertical to sonde. The focused current make possible to measure done on rocks with presize direction. This is the fixing tools that use unfocused current such ES (Electrical Survey) the previous, where the current survey more likely flow in mud due to mud resistivity is lesser than rock resistivity
  • 62. The Dual Laterolog measures formation resistivity over a wide dynamic range. It provides accurate readings up to 40,000 ohm-m. The DLL is generally the resistivity tool of choice in wells drilled with salt mud's, Especially if formation resistivity are high. DUAL LATEROLOG (DLL) Measurenment Range Deep Resistivity, LLd : 0,2 to 40,000 ohm-m Medium Resistivity, LLm : 0,2 to 40,000 ohm-m Measurement Precision Deep Resistivity, LLd : ± 2 % Medium Resistivity, LLm : ± 2 % Open Hole Services
  • 63. DLT & MSFL tools
  • 64. Micro Spherically Focused Log (MSFL) SPECIFICATIONS MEASUREMENT RANGE : MSFL Conductivity : 0 to 5,000 ms/m Caliper : 4 to 21 in (100 to 530 mm) MEASUREMENT PRECISION: MSFL Conductivity : +/-2 mS/m Caliper : +/-0,1 in (+/-2.5 mm) MAXIMUM RATINGS : Pressure: 20,000Psi (138,000 kPa) Temperature : 350 o F (177 o C) DIMENSIONS • Tool Length : 10,6 ft (3,23m) • Tool Weight : 200 lb (91 kg) • Maximum Diameter : 4,0 (102 mm) The MSFL can be used in fresh or saline muds. The pad mounted device incorporates a caliper measurement and the tool is typically run in combination with another resistivity device, most often the Dual Laterolog. The MSFL is a pad-Type microresistivity device employing a concentric arrangement of five electrodes to force the measurement current into a hemispherical pattern Open Hole Services
  • 65. Depth of Investigation and Vertical Resolution
  • 66. LIMITATION & PRESENTATION  Laterolog tools used to survey on well filled with mud with low resistivity also in rocks high resistivity  Laterolog tools can accurately measure rocks resistivity about 0.2 – 40000 ohmm. Laterolog tools recomed to use if:  Ratio Rmf/Rw < 2.5  Rocks resistivity > 200 ohmm.  Thickness < 10 feet.  Deep laterolog presented in track 3-4, logarithmic scale as thin line dashed with mnemonic LLD  Shallow laterolog presented in track 3-4, logarithmic scale as dotted line with mnemonic LLS  Microresistivity presented in track 3-4, logarithmic scale as solid line with mnemonic MSFL.  logarithmic scale usually in 4 cycle : 0.2 – 2000 ohmm.
  • 68. Resistivity Curve can be use as indicator percentage clay in rocks, VRT: (Rsand – Rt) VRT = ------------------------- x 4 Rclay/Rt (Rsand – Rclay) VRT usually relatively too high, except the rocks with high Resistivity. Due to clay is conductive, with minimal value Rsand will get value VRT 100% LATEROLOG PRESENTATION
  • 69. Correction Lateral Log MSFL borehole corrections (fig.14) Borehole corrections – to mud resistivity and borehole size (fig.15) Bed thickness corrections (fig.16) Invasion corrections – to invasion mud filtrate (fig. 17)
  • 70. Fig.15 Laterolog Borehole Correction Chart
  • 71. Fig. 17: Laterolog Invasion Correction Chart
  • 74. Log Density Application  Density tool measure density of rocks then use to define rock porosity.  Together with another logs such log neutron, rocks lithology and fluids type containing in the rocks can be defined.  Log density can differentiate Oil to gas in pore due to the fluids has different density.  Density tool in modern age also measure PEF (photoelectric effect) that useful for defining rocks lithology, identify heavy minerals and evaluate clay.  Log density also use to define Vclay also to calculate “reflection coefficients” along with log sonic to make synthetics seismogram.
  • 75. Principal work Density tool  A radioactive sources Cs137 has 1.5 Curie transmit GR energy 662 kev to the rocks.  Gamma rays interact with rocks electrons with Compton scattering mechanism, where gamma rays lose its energy also spread to many direction.  Compton scattering Proses result “clouds” gamma ray around source with radius vary according Rocks electron.  The more rocks electron the shorter clouds radius and therefore lesser gamma ray reach to the detector (count rates).  So e reverse equal to count rates or cps that accepted by detector  Gamma ray detected that less amount shows the existing larger electron density.  Bulk density b for many element has value near equal with electron density e as empirical equation bellow: b = 1.0704 e – 0.1883
  • 76.  The Litho density tools not only measure density, but also photoelectric absorption index PEF.  Photoelectric absorption happen if gamma ray that come has low energy.  There gamma ray catch by core atom and an electron throw by the atom. PEF = (Z/10)3.6 where: Z = number atom (= amount electron inatom).  Each element has Z particular value therefore PEF can be use as clue for rocks type.  PEF value very little depends on rocks porosity as seen on figure bellow  PEF also only little influenced by fluid in pores, but log PEF influenced by barite content on mud, because number atom Barium is high (Z=56). Principal work Density tool
  • 80. Figure 2. Figure 1. Principal work Density tool
  • 81. Calculation of Density Porosity PHID (its porosity from RHOB) : Due to bulk density b is amount of matrix density ma and fluid density f in pores then the porosity value of rocks can be define if the value ma (Recognize first the lithology). b = ma (1-PHID) + f (PHID) the equation will be: PHID = (b - ma ) / (f - ma ) where: ma = matrix density f = fluid density in pores
  • 83. QC/Interpretations.  Shales Density usually smaller than rocks density that free of clay (clean formation). Therefore shales porosity higher than rocks porosity.  The term “limestone compatible scales”, then:  In clean limestone RHOB & NPHI will overlay in shales RHOB will be in right side of NPHI,  In limestone that contain gas, NPHI will be in the right side of RHOB.  In clean sand that contain water, NPHI will be in right side of RHOB about 6-7 p.u.  In dolomite RHOB will be in right side of NPHI, similar with shale but gamma ray usually has higher value in dolomite.  The term “Sandstone compatible scales”, then :  In sandstone rocks the curve RHOB and NPHI will overlay.  Due to PEF water, hydrogen and oxygen is near zero, then porosity effect to PEF vey small and basic lithology usually can be define direct to PEF curve (see6.2 Typical log reading).
  • 85. Perhitungan Volume Shale (Vsh) A shaly formation on the figure if Vsh is shale part in rocks, then matrix part is (1-Vsh-), then: b = ma (1-Vsh-) + sh Vsh + f  and (ma - b ) – Vsh (ma - sh )  = ----------------------------------------------- (ma - f ) therfore (ma - b ) –  (ma - f ) Vsh = ---------------------------------------- (ma - sh ) Shale influence the porosity density and porosity neutron. If both corrected with shale effect, it will get effective porosity as follows: e = D - Vsh D e = N - Vsh N
  • 87. RHOB correction should be done to: Mud cake thickness ( in real time) Mud weight (alsoreal time) Rugose hole (real time) Borehole size.
  • 89. Application Log Neutron  Neutron tools used for define primary rocks porosity, that is rocks pore filled by water, oil or gas  Together with another log lain such log density, can be use to define rock type /lithology also fuluid type that fill the rocks pores.  Elastic scattering: Neutron Particle collide with another atom, therefore neutron particle change direction, but has still same energy.  Inelastic scattering: The collide with another atom, neutron particle has lose half its energy that given to atom that collided. This Atom experiencing “excitation”,then transmit energy again in Gamma Ray form that has specific spektrum. neutron Particle also change direction in this collide.
  • 91. Principal work Neutron tools  Radioaktif source Am241Be transmit Neutron particle to the rocks about 5 MeV energy.  After collition with the rocks, the neutron energy reduce to level 0.1-10 eV (level epithermal).  The collisions next reduces energy further to less than 0.025 eV (level thermal).  Due to mass Hydrogen near with Neutron, atom Hydrogen has bigger ability in slowing down neutron particle than another atoms in rocks.  Two thermal detector put on 1-2 ft upper radioactive sources. Ratio between amounts pulse : Nn/Nf are porosity function.  This Ratio has: Bore hole influence reduced Penetration depth further than one detector system .
  • 96. Depth of Investigation and Vertical Resolution.
  • 97. Presentation Log Neutron. Neutron porosity presented on track 5 - 6 with mnemonic NPHI with scale: 45% sampai - 15% or .45 sampai -.15 p.u 60% sampai 0% or .60 sampai 0 p.u
  • 98. Log Quality Control and Interpretation.  Shale influence reading log, then NPHI higher than true porosity due to water bound on shales.  The washed out well also make reading log higher than true porosity.  Rocks contain gas has hydrogen concentration lower than contain oil or water, therefore reading neutron log willl smaller than true porosity. The term “limestone compatible scale” are: RHOB : 1.95 - 2.95 NPHI : 45% - -15%  In limestone without shale content water RHOB curves and NPHI will overlay.  In shale rocks RHOB on right side NPHI.  In limestone contain gas, RHOB on left side NPHI. Separation larger than 6- 7 p.u  In sand without shale contain water , RHOB on left side NPHI with separation 6-7 p.u  In dolomite without shale contain water, RHOB on the right side NPHI.
  • 99. The term “sandstone compatible scale” are: RHOB: 1.90 gr/cc - 2.90 gr/cc NPHI : 45 % - -15 %  In sandstone without shale contain water RHOB and NPHI curves will overlay.  In shale RHOB on the right side NPHI.  In sandstone contain gas, RHOB on the left side NPHI. Separation larger than 3 p.u  In sandstone without shale contain oil , RHOB on the left side NPHI with separation 1-3 p.u
  • 100. Log Quality Control and Interpretation
  • 101. Formation content liquid.  All points porosity contain water will fall in area line sandstone and dolomite.  True Porosity can predict by: PHI = (PHID + PHIN)/2  For clean formation contain liquid, porosity above are effective porosity, and the value can be read as middle Density & Neutron logs. Formation content gas.  The exchange liquid with gas in pores reduce bulk density and hydrogen content.  Density go down - PHID go up.  Hydrogen content go down - PHIN go up.  The result is crossover effect recognize in Neutron and Density logs shows gas.  PHIN most bigger than PHID except crossover zone, that shows interval contain gas.
  • 102.  Another way measure porosity is use formula: PHI = (PHID2 + PHIN2)/2  With above formula will get porosity that close with the chart.  Therefore in formation contain gas, porosity not middle between Neutron and Density, but 2/3 distance between log Neutron to log Density.  Shale reduce the porosity Density measurement and Neutron. shale Volume can be calculated as follows: VDshale = (PHID - PHIeff)/PHIDsh VNshale = (PHIN - PHIeff)/PHINsh
  • 103. Environmental Corrections.  The quality of log guarantee good if been contacted between neutron tools with borehole wall.  Environmental corrections should be done to log NPHI are:  Borehole size  Borehole salinity  Borehole temperature and pressure.  Mud cake  Mud weight  Formation salinity  Toll stand-off from wall of bore hole
  • 105. Example Neutron Environmental Correction:  Uncorrected TNPH =34 pu in hole 12” reduce with 2 pu as correction to bore hole size.  If mud cake ¼ inch, no mud cake effect.  If salinity borehole 100 kppm, add with 1 pu.  If used natural mud with density 11 lb/gal then add with 2 pu.  If temperature borehole 150 degF, add with 4 pu.  If 5kpsi water based mud, reduce 1 pu  If 100kppm formation salinity, reduce 2.5 pu Total borehole correction: -2+1+2+4-1-2.5 = 1.5 pu. Associated Mnemonics
  • 106. Example of Neutron Environmental Correction:  Uncorrected TNPH =34 pu in hole 12” less by 2 pu as correction to bore hole size.  If mud cake ¼ inch, no mud cake effect.  If salinity borehole 100 kppm, add 1 pu.  If use natural mud with density 11 lb/gal then add 2 pu.  If tem. borehole 150 degF, add 4 pu.  If 5kpsi water based mud, remove 1 pu  If 100kppm formation salinity, remove 2.5 pu Total borehole correction: -2+1+2+4-1-2.5 = 1.5 pu.
  • 108. log sonic Application To define sonic porosity (s) To define volume of clay (Vs) Along with another logs to define lithology Time-depth relationship To define reflection coefficients Mechanical properties To define cement CBL-VDL quality Theory of measurement Sonic tool measure: speed of voice/sonic in formation. The principal on figure below : Transmitter transmit a “pressure pulse” frequency 25 kHz. The pulse resulting 6 wave: Compressional wave and refracts wave shear waving in formation. direct two wave as long as sonde and in mud. two surface wave as long as hole wall of well (pseudo Raleigh dan Stoneley) The speed of the waves about 4000 to 25 000 ft/sec depend on lithology
  • 110.  A compressional wave waving from transmitter via mud to formation , the waving in formation, then waving in mud again to reach receiver.  Transmitter transmit one pulse.  An electronic tool measure time from this pulse until time reach “the first negative excursion” detected by near receiver.  Transmitter transmit one pulse again.  Measured the time from pulse second to time reach “the first negative excursion” detected by far receiver. The Differ between those both time then divide by distance between receiver-receiver (span) as two ft resulting formation transit times in microseconds/ft (sec/ft). Compressional transit times vary: 40  sec/ft in hard formation 150  sec/ft in soft formation. Reverse transit time is velocity [feet/sec]. Shear wave travel time can be measured by logging Particular along with wave form processing. Principal log sonic tool
  • 111. Log sonic presented as DT in track 2 and 3, with sec/ft unit, bigger from right to left . The raise of porosity deflect curve to the left, equal to reading density and neutron. Small pips in depth track is “integrated travel time”. With small pips: 1 msec; between large pips: 10 msec The Caliper dan Gamma Ray curves – in track 1. Presentation log sonic
  • 113. Depth of Investigation & Vertical Resolution.
  • 117. Sonic porosity transform: By using Willie Time Average (WTA): DTlog – DTma 1 S = -------------------- x ------- DTfl - Dtma Cp where: S = porosity sonic DTma = transit time in 100% matrix. DTlog = transit time read on log. DTfl = transit time in 100% fluid Cp = compaction factor: Cp = 1 in hard formation Cp = DTsh/100 in unconsolidated formation Formula Raymer Hunt Gardner (RHG): Sonic Porosity calculated with this formula no need Cp and more close to core porosity value also porosity density-neutron differ by WTA. Equation RHG as follows: S = c x (DTlog-DTma)/DTlog where : c = 0.67 c = 0.60 in gas saturated reservoir rock
  • 118. Calculate Vsh from log Sonic: If shale exist in rocks, the formula WTA tobe: DTlog= DTma (1--Vsh) +DTfl.  + DTsh Vsh. DTsh value usually found about 80-110 sec/ft.
  • 119. Quick-look with Delta Log R  Delta Log R quick-look method to find hydrocarbon by overlay between deep resistivity curve with curve porosity  No need to know a,m,n and Rw first Basic Method Delta log R:  deep resistivity curve and porosity curve overlay in clean zone content water.  In hydrocarbon zone, curve resistivity will raise.  Resistivity scale: raise for example 0.2 - 2000 ohmm.  So the raise of resistivity caused curve deflect to right
  • 120. Delta Log R Quick-look with Delta Log R
  • 123.
  • 124. md (k) = (kcoef*PHIE**kexp)/(SWirr**2) (graphic 3) REGRESION LOGARITMIC grafik 2 Regresi Logaritmik kcore dan PHIcore sumur TJS-03 grafik 3 Permeabilitas core dan Log
  • 125. md (k) = (kcoef*PHIE**kexp)/(SWirr**2) (graphic 3) REGRESION LOGARITMIC graphic 3 Permeability core and Log
  • 126. INTERPRETATION METHODE  Quick Look : D LOG R (DELTA LOG R)  Interpretation by Cross Plot a. Lithology Model Approach - Cross Plot N-D - Cross Plot N-S - Cross Plot S-D - Cross Plot M-N b. Parameter Petrophysic calculation - Picket Plot (a, m & Rw) - Hingle Plot (Rw) - Cross Plot RWA-GR (Rclay & Water formation salinity) - Cross Plot PHIE-RHOMAU ( RhoH) c. Permeability Calculation Approach K = (kcoef x PHIEkexp)/(SWirr2) , mD
  • 128. Cross Plot S-D Cross Plot M-N
  • 129. Picket Plot (a, m & Rw) Hingle Plot (Rw)
  • 130. Cross Plot RWA-GR Cross Plot PHIE-OMAU ( RhoH)
  • 131. D LOG R (DELTA LOG R)
  • 134. CASE: T-42 (T-Field in South Africa)
  • 136. T-42 PHI cutoff ~ 0.17 Sw cutoff ~ 0.57 Vcl~0.35 a= 1, m=1.99, n=2 (in South Africa)
  • 138. Log-Core Data Validation Core Data: Dean Stark Avg. PHIE~21.7 Avg. Density 2.65 Avg. SW~11.16 PRELIMINARY CLEAN PLUG CORE ANALYSIS DATA Avg. Perm~341.98mD Petrophysic: Avg. PHIE~19.83 (Mod simandoux, A=1, m=2, n=2 ) Avg. SW~24.12 Or 16.2 (@ Sand) (Resistivity Log) Perm X~330mD ( PHIE & Vcl) RWA adjustment to 0.1 (T-Field in South Africa)
  • 139. 1.00 10.00 100.00 1000.00 0 10 20 30 40 50 Permeability - Vcl Cross Plot Perm X VClay Permeabili ty Permeability - VClay Crossplot of The OBSF-05 well Properties Parameter cut off SW - Perm X Crossplot of The OBSF-05 well SO-PHIE Crossplot of The OBSF-05 well (T-Field in South Africa)
  • 140. Reservoir Rock Type Perm X - PHIE of The OBSF-05 well (T-Field in South Africa) PermX Reservoir sand formation divided three Rock type based on Permeability – PHIE (fraction) relation with Vshale of OBSF-05 Core data. The Formation sand Rock types consist of RT 1, RT 2 and RT 3 where each has particular formula. RT 1 with Volume Shale (Vsh) less than 20% has low permeability and low porosity, RT 2 with Vsh. 20% to 40% has medium permeability and medium porosity, RT 3 with Vsh. Up to 40% has high permeability and medium- high porosity.
  • 141.  From many Sources Reference