Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Well Log Interpretation

3,423 views

Published on

An overview of the basic well log interpretation methods

Published in: Science
  • Hello! I have searched hard to find a reliable and best research paper writing service and finally i got a good option for my needs as ⇒ www.WritePaper.info ⇐
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here

Well Log Interpretation

  1. 1. WELL LOG INTERPRETATION Presented by: ADEMOLA SORUNGBE October 22nd, 2019
  2. 2. PRESENTATION OUTLINE  What is Well Log Interpretation?  Historical Background  Origin of the term “Petrophysics”  Importance of Well Log Interpretation  Well Log Interpretation  Case Study 1  Case Study 2  Conclusion 2
  3. 3. WHAT IS WELL LOG INTERPRETATION? 3
  4. 4.  Well log interpretation is the use of well log data to estimate various reservoir properties  Interpretation of well logs will reveal both the mineralogical and proportion of solid constituents of the rock (i.e. grains, matrix and cement), and the nature and proportions (porosity, saturations) of the interstitial fluids (O. Serra, 1984)  They are also key instruments in well productivity assessment 4
  5. 5. Source: A Numerical Model of the Kizildere Geothermal Field, Turkey (S.K. Garg et. Al, 2015) Kizildere Oil Field, Denizli Province, Turkey 5  Well log interpretation is primarily aimed at quantitative characterization of subsurface reservoirs Injectors Producers
  6. 6. 6  Well log analysts are the investigators  Well logs are the evidence
  7. 7. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF WELL LOG INTERPRETATION 7
  8. 8. 8 The original geophysical logging equipment used by the Schlumberger brothers in the late 1920's Source: Schlumberger, 2000  In 1927 the first electrical resistivity well log was acquired in France  At this time well logs were only qualitative indicators of hydrocarbon presence
  9. 9.  Well log interpretation is as old as the research of the “father of petrophysics” – Gustavus Archie  BS Mining Engineering (1931), Combined MS in Mining Engineering and Geology (1933)  Joined SHELL (Kansas) in 1934  His research focused on transforming the then Schlumberger resistivity log to a quantitative tool 9
  10. 10.  Young Archie was assigned the task of examining cuttings and electric cores, before being transferred to the Texas Gulf area in 1938  Archie undertook a systematic investigation of every existing Shell Texas Gulf area electric log together with its companion core analysis, mud log, and test data (E.C. Thomas, 2018)  Archie’s work was aimed at solving one of the most serious problems of the early 1940’s, that of obtaining porosity, permeability and hydrocarbon saturation from electric log responses correlated and calibrated to core measurements (E.C. Thomas, 2018) 10
  11. 11.  He played the key role in identification of producible horizons at the giant Elk City Field in Oklahoma (1947)  An episode which dramatically demonstrated for the first time the role that well log measurements could play in identifying pay zones (www.wiki.seg.com) 11 Archie’s Breakthrough
  12. 12.  SHELL was drilling a deep well (Walter 1) targeting the Springer sands at 12000ft  Cuttings and electric log indicated no hydrocarbon  The shallower Granite Wash zone was cased and drillstem tests showed no producible hydrocarbon in the deeper Springer sands  Tulsa office requested permission from Houston to plug and abandon, but met resistance from the then VP of Shell 12 Archie’s Breakthrough
  13. 13.  Archie had been analyzing the electric logs at the Tulsa office where he plotted the RT and SP logs, observing a consistent trend except for one zone (i.e. the Granite Wash zone)  He convinced the VP against the wish of his colleagues at Tulsa to test the Granite Wash zone, arguing that light hydrocarbon may not show noticeable fluorescence  Archie was right, but he lost his hat; a small price to pay for discovering the 110-million BOE Elk City Field, which later supported a 20-rig drilling program (E.R. Shorey, Jr.,1992) 13 Archie’s Breakthrough
  14. 14.  In September 1949, Gus presented before the Houston Geological Society, and later published in the Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, the paper which forever married geology and physics: “Introduction to Petrophysics of Reservoir Rocks” (Archie, 1950)  In this seminal work, he introduced the term petrophysics to express the physics of rocks  The word itself had been coined earlier in discussions about the subject with Gus’ counterpart with SHELL, J.H.M.A. Thomeer 14 Origin of the term “PETROPHYSICS”
  15. 15. 15 Well Log Interpretation: An interdisciplinary tool Geomechanics Petrophysics Reservoir Engr. Production Engr. Drilling Engr. Geology Geophysics RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION
  16. 16. 16  Reservoir characterization is the process of preparing a quantitative representation of a reservoir using data from a variety of sources and disciplines (www.sciencedirect.com)  It includes:  Reservoir mapping (seismic and lithostratigraphic)  Fluid typing/contact delineation  Rock property determination (e.g. porosity, permeability, clay volume)  Fluid property analysis (e.g. fluid viscosity, formation volume factor)  Pressure estimation  Etc.
  17. 17. 17  Well logs are also used in reservoir and well performance monitoring  Which includes:  Identifying flow profiles  Well diagnostics  Assessing treatment effectiveness  Time lapse assessment (contact movement, saturation change)  Etc.
  18. 18. 18 WELL LOG INTERPRETATION
  19. 19. BASIC WORK FLOW 19 Load data Define log cutoffs Generate a summary report Fluid Typing Calculate Volume of Shale Calculate Porosity Calculate Saturation Data Check View/Edit Data
  20. 20. Data Check 20  Review the logs available (soft and hardcopy). Soft copy logs are mainly in .las and .ascii formats  Look through well log header and take note of relevant information  Digitize hardcopy logs in the event of missing digital logs  Prepare log availability matrix table for all the wells to assess evaluability
  21. 21. Log and Data Availability table 21
  22. 22. 22  Digital logs are loaded into the available interpretation software package e.g. Techlog, IP, Geolog, PowerBench etc.  Some softwares are now integrated and can do more than just basic well log interpretation Source: https://www.academia.edu : Schlumberger Techlog Manual Import window Project window Data Import
  23. 23. 23  Depth Shifting  Removal of End Effects  Rescaling  Splicing  Fill Gaps  Value Editing  Patching  Before any log interpretation, detailed log QC should always be done  The main purpose of well log editing is to prepare the well data for interpretation Well Log Editing
  24. 24. Depth Shifting 24  It is the process of aligning a log to a common depth with respect to a reference log (usually GR or RES)  2 Methods of Depth Shifting  Bulk depth shift  Multiple tie line depth shift  Core PHI and K are also shifted where needed Source: Well Log Data Processing by Shoaib Aamir Fahim
  25. 25. Removal of End Effect 25  In some cases, the logging tool records data from the casing shoe or spikes associated with the first or last tool reading  These spikes are not associated with lithology Source: Well Log Data Processing by Shoaib Aamir Fahim
  26. 26. Removal of End Effect 26 End Effects False indication of evaporite
  27. 27. Rescaling 27  Allows for correction of improper calibration, missed scale changes of digitized logs, neutron count conversion, linear to logarithmic conversion, etc. Patching  The patch curves editing is used to remove unwanted data points such as noise spikes, and to reshape curves  Editing of sonic for cycle skipping and density for any borehole washout
  28. 28. Splicing 28  This is useful for merging curves from different logging runs into a single composite curve Fill Gaps  Fill Gap is used to replace nulls with values interpolated between valid data points  Typically the gaps are not more than 2ft
  29. 29. Fluid Typing 30 GAS-OIL CONTACT OIL-WATER CONTACT LIGHT HYDROCARBON EFFECT
  30. 30. Fluid distribution plots 31  Fluid distribution stick plots are diagrammatic representations of the lateral and vertical spread of the fluids seen by each well  Fluid contacts are extremely important tools for contact analysis
  31. 31. Fluid distribution plots 32  Stick plots of pre-production wells are used in selecting contacts for HIIP volumetric in each reservoir  Used by production technologists when choosing re-perforation opportunities in collaboration with RST logs  A plot of cumulative production versus contacts is sometimes used to predict contact movement with production
  32. 32. 33 ROCK PROPERTY ESTIMATION
  33. 33. 34 What are Shales? Shale Volume Estimation
  34. 34. 35 What are Shales?  Shales are ROCKS! Rock classification on the basis of particle size
  35. 35. 36 What are Shales?  Shales are ROCKS! Rock classification on the basis of particle size  70% clay sized particles and 30% silt sized particles  Clay particles – Clay minerals and micas  Silt particles – Quartz and feldspars
  36. 36. 38 Why are we interested in Shales?
  37. 37. 39  Our interest in shales is for the most part indirect Why are we interested in Shales?
  38. 38. 40  Our interest in shales is for the most part indirect  The effect of clay minerals on log readings and pore interconnectivity is our main interest Why are we interested in Shales?
  39. 39. 41  Our interest in shales is for the most part indirect  The effect of clay minerals on log readings and pore interconnectivity is our main interest  Shale beds are also important to us in net sand count Why are we interested in Shales?
  40. 40. 42 What are we really estimating? Shale Volume or Clay Volume?
  41. 41. 43 What are we really estimating? Shale Volume or Clay Volume?  GR logs respond to clays
  42. 42. 44 What are we really estimating? Shale Volume or Clay Volume?  GR logs respond to clays  An increase in Density and Neutron typically means an increase in clay content
  43. 43. 45 What are we really estimating? Shale Volume or Clay Volume?  GR logs respond to clays  An increase in Density and Neutron typically means an increase in clay content  Silt is fine grained QUARTZ and variations in log measurements is caused by the occurrence of clay minerals and micas
  44. 44. 46 Shale/Clay Occurrence Pore filling Pore lining Pore bridging Pore filling kaolinite booklet Clay laminae Quartz grain Filamentous illite Sources: www.spec2000.net www.webmineral.com
  45. 45. Computation (Neutron-Density) 49 Matrix Parameter Shale Parameter
  46. 46. Computation (GR) 50 Assumed 100% shale parameter GRsh Assumed 0% shale parameter GRclean
  47. 47. 51 Porosity Estimation  Total Porosity (PHIT): Ratio of pore volume to bulk volume i.e. Volume occupied by Free Fluid + Clay bound water + Capillary Bound Water/Irreducible Water + Isolated pore fluids + micro-porosities in organic matter  Effective Porosity (PHIE): Portion of the total porosity available for fluid flow  Secondary Porosity: Porosities that developed after burial and compaction e.g. fractures, vugs, etc.
  48. 48. 52 What exactly is Total and Effective Porosity?
  49. 49. 53 What exactly is Total and Effective Porosity?
  50. 50. 54 What exactly is Total and Effective Porosity? Source: Development in Petroleum Science Vol. 65: Physical Properties of Rocks Source: www.epgeology.com
  51. 51. 55 What exactly is Total and Effective Porosity? Source: Crain’s Petrophysics www.spec2000.net
  52. 52. 56 What exactly is Total and Effective Porosity?  Total and Effective porosity varies with the “measuring instrument”  PHIT from Neutron differs from that from density log  PHIT measurements from core require special cleaning and drying techniques to avoid the collapse of the clay crystals  Proper core measurements is the ground truth, but with minimal depth coverage
  53. 53. 57 What exactly is Total and Effective Porosity?  There is no final position on what constitutes effective porosity  This depends once again on the method of measurement  But, if residual hydrocarbon forms part of the effective porosity, then Swir/Capillary bound water should
  54. 54. 58 PHIE = PHIT * (1 – VSH) PHIE = PHIT – VSH/PHITsh PHIE = PHIT – VCL/PHITcl i.e. PHIT - CBW Computation (Density)  Of all the basic logs, density log is the most accurate in estimating total porosity  Secondary porosity can be estimated by subtracting sonic porosity from density porosity
  55. 55. 59 Computation (Sonic)
  56. 56. 60  Permeability is a measure of a rocks’ ability to transmit fluid/gas  It is dependent on a rock’s effective porosity and also on 2 facies dependent variables (pore throat size and distribution)  There are several porosity dependent empirical models that attempt to predict permeability e.g. Coates, Timur, Wyllie and Rose, Morris- Briggs, etc.  These models do not account for the effect of pore throat sizes and distribution Permeability Prediction
  57. 57. 61  Results from these models can be calibrated to accurate measurements from core or well test Log-based Permeability
  58. 58. 62 Facies-based Permeability (FZI)  Proposed by Amaefule et al (1993). Core and Log data identify flow units and predict permeability in uncored intervals  FZI values determined from core analysis data (poro, perm) is used to identify appropriate FZI values for each facies class  FZI values are assigned to each defined facies class along the well
  59. 59. 63 Facies-based Permeability (FZI)
  60. 60. 64 Facies-based Permeability (Poro-Perm)
  61. 61. 65 Water Saturation Estimation Archie’s Equation Where: Rw = water resistivity Rt = true resistivity deep  = porosity m = cementation exponent n = cementation exponentRw – Pickett plot or produced water analysis m, n – Core analysis report or empirical relationships
  62. 62. 66 Shaly Sand Empirical Models  At the start few empirical equations were developed  These applied to specific regions  They used effective porosity (φe)  They used parameters for clay, such as Vcl and Rcl
  63. 63. 67 Shaly Sand Excess Conductivity Models  Three equations were developed independently by Shell and Schlumberger to account for the conductivity of the shale  These equations are based on theory and hence have more universal applicationsSource: http://www.nexttraining.net
  64. 64. 68 Petrophysical Property Summation Cutoff Sensitivity Analysis
  65. 65. 69 Cutoff Logplot
  66. 66. 70 Summary Table
  67. 67. 71 CASE STUDY 1
  68. 68. 72 Analyzing Well Logs From the Montoya Lime Using a New Carbonate Well Log Interpretation Procedure by Walsh, Brown, and Asquith  In this study, they tried to account for the effect on pore type (intercrystalline, bimodal, fracture, or vug) on cementation factor (m)  Crossplots of well logs were used to determine the dominant porosity types along a reservoir of interest (60ft low porosity Montoya Lime)  The type of porosity determined their choice of variable m equation that was used for Sw calculation  @m=2 >>SwAR 80-100%
  69. 69. 73 Variable “m” Empirical Relationships Intergranular/intercrystalline porosity Vugs Fractures Bimodal porosity
  70. 70. 74 Pore Type Crossplots PHIT_S vs PHIT_D PHIT_Rs vs PHIT_D M vs N Rs/Rz vs Rt/Rw SW_AR vs SW_Ratio  Depending on where the points cluster, each interval analyzed can be classified on the basis on its predominant porosity type  The final choice is based on results from all the plots  The authors noted that in carbonates, there is a tendency for pore type to change vertically along the same reservoir
  71. 71. 75 Montoya Lime Example  Lithology: Limestone (confirmed by N/D and M-N crossplot)  Porosity: 2 to 4% (from N/D)  SwT: 80 – 100% (assuming constant m value of 2)  Pore Type: Intercrystalline (only SWT_arch vs SWT_ratio indicated fracture porosity)  SwT: 40 – 65% (using pore type dependent variable m). A productive zone would have been by-passed
  72. 72. 76 CASE STUDY 2
  73. 73. 77 Hydrocarbon Effect Correction on Porosity Calculation from Density Neutron Logs using Volume of Shale in Niger Delta by Anyaehie and Olanrewaju (SPDC Nigeria)  The authors developed a method for the estimation of porosity that does not depend on fluid density  Fluid density depends on fluid composition, mud property, and invasion profile  The proposed method is a modification of the well known 1/3, 2/3 method
  74. 74. 78 Background  In a clean water bearing zone, NPHI should read same as PHI_D since NPHI is calibrated to water  In a clean hydrocarbon bearing interval, the fluid alone is responsible for a deviation from the above scenario  This deviation from norm does not always occur in the same proportion; especially in light hydrocarbon sands  Therefore, it is possible to correct for this effect if the right proportion can be established
  75. 75. 80 By combining the NPHI and DPHI at a 50:50 proportion, they arrived at the same average porosity value of the core acquired within this interval  The authors tested this “proportion idea” in an oil bearing zone with core porosity for reference PHIToil = 0.5(0.16) + 0.5(0.29)
  76. 76. 81  50:50 proportion was observed to work fine for clean oil zones  However, the proportion had to be adjusted for the light hydrocarbon zones due to the variability in the effect of gas/light oil on the N/D logs compared to oil PHITcorr = 1/3((PHIT_D)(2+VSH)+NPHI(1-VSH)) – For Gas Zones PHITcorr = 0.5((PHIT_D)(1+VSH)+NPHI(1-VSH)) - For Oil Zones  The 1/3:2/3 method does not give good results in shaly zones, therefore the authors introduced the shale correction factor
  77. 77. 82 Comparison of proposed method with existing methods Proposed method giving the best result
  78. 78. 83 CONCLUSION
  79. 79. 84 In Conclusion  Well log interpretation is the basis of any formation evaluation and reservoir characterization exercise  The use of well logs as an interpretation tool cuts across several disciplines  A good understanding of the operating principles of well logging tools and the geologic interpretation of well logs is important for proper well log interpretation
  80. 80. References 1. Development in Petroleum Science 15A: Fundamentals of well logging interpretation by O. Serra 1984 2. SPWLA Today Newsletter. Issue 4. Vol. 1. September 2018 3. Enhanced Reservoir Description: Using Core and Log Data to Identify Hydraulic (Flow) Units and Predict Permeability in Uncored Intervals/Wells 4. www.wiki.seg.com 5. https://www.academia.edu : Schlumberger Techlog Manual 6. Well Log Data Processing by Shoaib Aamir Fahim 7. Pettijohn, F.J. (1975) Sedimentary Rocks. 2nd Edition, Harper and Row Publishers, New York, 628 p. 8. http://www.nexttraining.net 9. Analyzing Well Logs From the Montoya Lime Using a New Carbonate Well Log Interpretation Procedure by J.W. Walsh and S.L. Brown, The Logic Group, and G.B. Asquith, Texas Tech U. (1994) 10. Hydrocarbon Effect Correction on Porosity Calculation from Density Neutron Logs using Volume of Shale in Niger Delta by Anyaehie and Olanrewaju (SPDC Nigeria) (2010) 85
  81. 81. 86

×