OSFair2017 Workshop | Frontiers’ Ambition for Open Science
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
0 likes•172 views
Frederick Fenter presenting the Frontiers' platform | OSFair2017 Workshop Workshop title: Open Access Models & Platforms Workshop overview: What are the emerging models of Open Access for publications? Who should be involved? How are costs distributed over the stakeholders involved? How can OA platforms innovate further to embrace Open Science? This workshop will discuss and showcase the range of models available, including their costs and organisational aspects, to discuss their relative strengths and weaknesses in different academic contexts. When: DAY 1 - PARALLEL SESSION 1 & 2
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Similar to OSFair2017 Workshop | Frontiers’ Ambition for Open Science
Similar to OSFair2017 Workshop | Frontiers’ Ambition for Open Science (20)
More from Open Science Fair
More from Open Science Fair (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
OSFair2017 Workshop | Frontiers’ Ambition for Open Science
- 1. The Frontiers Platform Frederick Fenter, Executive Editor Open Science Fair Athens, September 2017
- 2. Frontiers Platform in Keywords
- 3. Coding in Open Science
- 5. Global Team: 300+ employees (2/3 in IT) Team Frontiers: Editorial and IT Expertise
- 6. vector space model semantic vectors semantic topics concepts social graph impact vector keywords citation graph Authors Editors Reviewers Extract Consolidate by Research Topic Journal Organisation Use for … Paper Editor & Reviewer Suggestion Reading List Publication Suggestion ? Journal Advisor Text & Data Mine with artificial Intelligence trained models & machine learning algorithmsPapers … Artificial Intelligence @ Frontiers
- 7. Open Science for Sustainability
- 8. Editorial Infrastructure 23 Specialty Sections Network of Excellence 2,531 Editorial Board Members Core Content 99 Research Topics 149 published articles Health, Food and Sustainability 23 Specialty Sections including: • Nutrition and Environmental Sustainability • Eating Behavior • Obesity • Food Microbiology • Nutrition and Food Science Technology • ….
- 10. Manuscript title John Smith Jane Doe Paul Great Anna Amazing 1 2 3 4 5 Review Forum 1 2 3 4 5 Clear step-by-step review process, important manuscript information and options to contact people. Quick links to all files and actions to manage the review process. Status and call-to-action with precise instructions to authors, reviewers and editors. Tab overview: review history, automated quality checks, reviewer & editor assignments and review reports. Reviewer suggestions based on semantic algorithm with overview of their availability.
- 11. 1 Reviewer tab with discussion directly between the author and reviewer. 1 Review Forum
- 13. Loop Profiles for every role
- 14. Loop Profiles for every role
- 15. Coding in Impact Metrics
- 16. Impact Metrics
- 17. Impact: 270 million article views & downloads
- 18. Impact Metrics
- 20. 75’000 editors from 140 countries Engage and Connect
- 23. Automated checks at every stage On Submission • Plagiarism screening • Duplicate submission • Previously rejected • Image manipulation • Ethics statement Associate Editor assigned • Conflicts of interest check Reviewers assigned • Conflicts of interest check • Review reports of sufficient rigour Final validation • Quality checklist verified • Final version of manuscript uploaded • Final reviewer consensus check • Financial conflicts of interest • Spelling and grammar checks • Controversial topics • Author watch-list • Affiliation watch-list
- 24. Focus on quality iThenticate – citation check of manuscripts
- 26. 89 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Countofarticles Time in review (days) Average time from submission to decision for all Frontiers Journals 50% of all papers: 40-100 days 75% of all papers: 15-135 days Scalable Processes
- 27. Peer review satisfaction High approval rates amongst over 11,000 authors, reviewers and editors surveyed.
- 28. Coding in Data Compliance
- 29. Open Science Platform: Data Deposition
- 30. Future of Data: European Open Science Cloud
- 33. Field Chief Editor Specialty Chief Editors Sabine Kastner Princeton University, USA Understanding Neuroscience Shane Larson Northwestern University, USA Understanding Astronomy and Space Science Berend Smit École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland Understanding Earth and its Resources Mark Brandon The Open University, UK Understanding Earth and its Resources Daniel Kammen University of California, Berkeley, USA Understanding Earth and its Resources Fulvio D’Acquisto Queen Mary University of London, UK Understanding Health Pasquale Maffia University of Glasgow, UK Understanding Health Chelsea Specht Cornell University, USA Understanding Biodiversity Jeremy Martin University of Kansas, USA Understanding Mathematics Robert Knight University of California, Berkeley, USA Editorial Board – Chief Editors
- 35. Collaborations
- 37. Thanks!
Editor's Notes
- Decision to build our own platform
- Accountability, transparency, collaborative action,
- Tremendous investment in the IT of publishing
- Improves qualtiy control
- First feature: collaborative review
- Frist feature : Collaborative review
- Frist feature : Collaborative review
- Median: 77 This is for all journals, since 2007 This is for all manuscripts that received a final decision (removed deleted). Includes acceptances and rejections.
- With the expansion into new specialties, our community of Chief Editors also grew. Bob Knight stepped up from the role of Chief Editor of Neuroscience to Field Chief Editor of the whole journal taking on a figure head role.
- Neuroscience - 2013 Astro, Earth – 2014 Health – 2015 Biodiversity – 2016 Mathematics - 2017
- In general, interest from other parties have always been strong due to our CC-BY license. Collaborations with participating organizations As part of our vision for a sustainable long-term approach, we are establishing collaborations and relationships with other publishers and research societies, who commit to recommending articles from their publications to translations into Young Minds versions. In 2015, we created a recommendation portal to make tis process as simple as possible for the collaborators. In 2015, CellPress joined as a participating organization, followed with the American Physiological Society and the Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society in 2017. A number of other organizations are in the final discussions with plans to participate (Annals of Internal Medicine, Entomological Society of America, British Ecological Society). The GLOBE Program is a k-12 citizen science program that reached more than 10 million students in the last 20 years. It encourages scientists to get involved with outreach and our partnership together will allow for both of our communities to get involved with each other. For example, encouraging authors who have used GLOBE data sets to write Young Minds versions of their work. This will enable students to read directly about the research they helped to make possible.
- In late 2016, we began working on a plan to launch the translations of articles first, then the website itself, with the long term goal of translating the review process to allow all Young Minds around the world to participate. In 2017, we have begun with the help of several voluntary groups around the world, the effort to translate the first set of articles in the following languages so far; French, Hebrew, Spanish, Portuguese. In July 2017, we received sponsorship to take this one step further and we are currently establishing a community of Young Minds in Israel. The funding from the Drahi foundation will support the development needed to achieve this.