state space representation,State Space Model Controllability and Observabilit...Waqas Afzal
State Variables of a Dynamical System
State Variable Equation
Why State space approach
Block Diagram Representation Of State Space Model
Controllability and Observability
Derive Transfer Function from State Space Equation
Time Response and State Transition Matrix
Eigen Value
Nams- Roots of equations by numerical methodsRuchi Maurya
Bisection method. The simplest root-finding algorithm is the bisection method. ...
False position (regula falsi) ...
Interpolation. ...
Newton's method (and similar derivative-based methods) ...
Secant method. ...
Interpolation. ...
Inverse interpolation. ...
Brent's method.
In mathematics and computing, a root-finding algorithm is an algorithm, for finding values x such that f(x) = 0, for a given continuous function f from the real numbers to real numbers or from the complex numbers to the complex numbers. Such an x is called a root or zero of the function f. As, generally, the roots may not be described exactly, they are approximated as floating point numbers, or isolated in small intervals (or disks for complex roots), an interval or disk output being equivalent to an approximate output together with an error bound.
Solving an equation f(x) = g(x) is the same as finding the roots of the function f – g. Thus root-finding algorithms allows solving any equation.
Numerical root-finding methods use iteration, producing a sequence of numbers that hopefully converge towards the root as a limit. They require one or more initial guesses of the root as starting values, then each iteration of the algorithm produces a successively more accurate approximation to the root. Since the iteration must be stopped at some point these methods produce an approximation to the root, not an exact solution. Many methods compute subsequent values by evaluating an auxiliary function on the preceding values. The limit is thus a fixed point of the auxiliary function, which is chosen for having the roots of the original equation as fixed points.
The behaviour of root-finding algorithms is studied in numerical analysis. Algorithms perform best when they take advantage of known characteristics of the given function, so different algorithms are used to solve different types of equations. Desirable characteristics include a rapid rate of convergence, ability to separate close roots, robustness against failures of differentiability, and low propagation rate of rounding errors.
State space analysis, eign values and eign vectorsShilpa Shukla
State space analysis concept, state space model to transfer function model in first and second companion forms jordan canonical forms, Concept of eign values eign vector and its physical meaning,characteristic equation derivation is presented from the control system subject area.
state space representation,State Space Model Controllability and Observabilit...Waqas Afzal
State Variables of a Dynamical System
State Variable Equation
Why State space approach
Block Diagram Representation Of State Space Model
Controllability and Observability
Derive Transfer Function from State Space Equation
Time Response and State Transition Matrix
Eigen Value
Nams- Roots of equations by numerical methodsRuchi Maurya
Bisection method. The simplest root-finding algorithm is the bisection method. ...
False position (regula falsi) ...
Interpolation. ...
Newton's method (and similar derivative-based methods) ...
Secant method. ...
Interpolation. ...
Inverse interpolation. ...
Brent's method.
In mathematics and computing, a root-finding algorithm is an algorithm, for finding values x such that f(x) = 0, for a given continuous function f from the real numbers to real numbers or from the complex numbers to the complex numbers. Such an x is called a root or zero of the function f. As, generally, the roots may not be described exactly, they are approximated as floating point numbers, or isolated in small intervals (or disks for complex roots), an interval or disk output being equivalent to an approximate output together with an error bound.
Solving an equation f(x) = g(x) is the same as finding the roots of the function f – g. Thus root-finding algorithms allows solving any equation.
Numerical root-finding methods use iteration, producing a sequence of numbers that hopefully converge towards the root as a limit. They require one or more initial guesses of the root as starting values, then each iteration of the algorithm produces a successively more accurate approximation to the root. Since the iteration must be stopped at some point these methods produce an approximation to the root, not an exact solution. Many methods compute subsequent values by evaluating an auxiliary function on the preceding values. The limit is thus a fixed point of the auxiliary function, which is chosen for having the roots of the original equation as fixed points.
The behaviour of root-finding algorithms is studied in numerical analysis. Algorithms perform best when they take advantage of known characteristics of the given function, so different algorithms are used to solve different types of equations. Desirable characteristics include a rapid rate of convergence, ability to separate close roots, robustness against failures of differentiability, and low propagation rate of rounding errors.
State space analysis, eign values and eign vectorsShilpa Shukla
State space analysis concept, state space model to transfer function model in first and second companion forms jordan canonical forms, Concept of eign values eign vector and its physical meaning,characteristic equation derivation is presented from the control system subject area.
Iteration for Euler method by using Projectile motion
I have used the projectile motion and implement the Euler method for calculating the values of iteration to reach time at 0.2 secs.We can change it to study the response after 0.2 secs
Periodic Function, Dirichlet's Condition, Fourier series, Even & Odd functions, Euler's Formula for Fourier Coefficients, Change of Interval, Fourier series in the intervals (0,2l), (-l,l) , (-pi, pi), (0, 2pi), Half Range Cosine & Sine series Root mean square, Complex Form of Fourier series, Parseval's Identity
Iteration for Euler method by using Projectile motion
I have used the projectile motion and implement the Euler method for calculating the values of iteration to reach time at 0.2 secs.We can change it to study the response after 0.2 secs
Periodic Function, Dirichlet's Condition, Fourier series, Even & Odd functions, Euler's Formula for Fourier Coefficients, Change of Interval, Fourier series in the intervals (0,2l), (-l,l) , (-pi, pi), (0, 2pi), Half Range Cosine & Sine series Root mean square, Complex Form of Fourier series, Parseval's Identity
Optimal Control: Perspectives from the Variational Principles of Mechanicsismail_hameduddin
Optimal control is a tremendously important and popular area of research in modern control engineering. The extraordinary elegance of optimal control results, the significance of their implications and the unresolved nature of their practical implementation have excited the minds of generations of engineers and mathematicians. Despite the ongoing interest in optimal control, an appreciation of the origins of optimal control in analytical mechanics is still lacking. This work overviews the fundamentals of optimal control and attempts to expose the deeper connections between optimal control and early results in analytical mechanics. The two-point boundary value problem is given due importance (with its parallel in analytical mechanics) and special emphasis is placed on the feedback form of optimal control (Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation) since this ties in closely with Hamilton-Jacobi theory of analytical mechanics. Numerical solutions to the optimal control problem and in particular, the generalized Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation with successive Galerkin approximations, are also discussed to highlight recent trends and motivations behind optimal control research.
We explore the application of optimal control techniques in agent-based macroeconomics. We specifically discussed the Ramsey-Cass-Koopman (savings), Barro (public finance), and Ellis-Fender (corruption) models. Model discussions lifted from Sala-i-Martin's lecture notes on economic growth. Some formulations were taken from lectures of Prof. Emmanuel de Dios and Prof. Rolando Danao of UP School of Economics. All errors mine.
Robust model predictive control for discrete-time fractional-order systemsPantelis Sopasakis
In this paper we propose a tube-based robust model predictive control scheme for fractional-order discrete-
time systems of the Grunwald-Letnikov type with state and input constraints. We first approximate the infinite-dimensional fractional-order system by a finite-dimensional linear system and we show that the actual dynamics can be approximated arbitrarily tight. We use the approximate dynamics to design a tube-based model predictive controller which endows to the controlled closed-loop system robust stability properties
In this talk, we discuss some recent advances in probabilistic schemes for high-dimensional PIDEs. It is known that traditional PDE solvers, e.g., finite element, finite difference methods, do not scale well with the increase of dimension. The idea of probabilistic schemes is to link a wide class of nonlinear parabolic PIDEs to stochastic Levy processes based on nonlinear version of the Feynman-Kac theory. As such, the solution of the PIDE can be represented by a conditional expectation (i.e., a high-dimensional integral) with respect to a stochastic dynamical system driven by Levy processes. In other words, we can solve the PIDEs by performing high-dimensional numerical integration. A variety of quadrature methods could be applied, including MC, QMC, sparse grids, etc. The probabilistic schemes have been used in many application problems, e.g., particle transport in plasmas (e.g., Vlasov-Fokker-Planck equations), nonlinear filtering (e.g., Zakai equations), and option pricing, etc.
Phase Retrieval: Motivation and TechniquesVaibhav Dixit
This presentation describes two techniques namely Transport of Intensity Equation(TIE) technique and Phase Diversity technique for retrieving phase information from light.
We present a class of continuous, bounded, finite-time stabilizing controllers for the tranlational and double integrator based on Bhat and Bernstein's work of IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 43, No. 5, May 1998
The standard view of philosophers is that the existence of particular events within our universe is capable of being explained in terms of initial conditions and natural laws, but that the existence of our universe itself is a 'brute
given' that is incapable of naturalistic explanation ....
Enchancing adoption of Open Source Libraries. A case study on Albumentations.AIVladimir Iglovikov, Ph.D.
Presented by Vladimir Iglovikov:
- https://www.linkedin.com/in/iglovikov/
- https://x.com/viglovikov
- https://www.instagram.com/ternaus/
This presentation delves into the journey of Albumentations.ai, a highly successful open-source library for data augmentation.
Created out of a necessity for superior performance in Kaggle competitions, Albumentations has grown to become a widely used tool among data scientists and machine learning practitioners.
This case study covers various aspects, including:
People: The contributors and community that have supported Albumentations.
Metrics: The success indicators such as downloads, daily active users, GitHub stars, and financial contributions.
Challenges: The hurdles in monetizing open-source projects and measuring user engagement.
Development Practices: Best practices for creating, maintaining, and scaling open-source libraries, including code hygiene, CI/CD, and fast iteration.
Community Building: Strategies for making adoption easy, iterating quickly, and fostering a vibrant, engaged community.
Marketing: Both online and offline marketing tactics, focusing on real, impactful interactions and collaborations.
Mental Health: Maintaining balance and not feeling pressured by user demands.
Key insights include the importance of automation, making the adoption process seamless, and leveraging offline interactions for marketing. The presentation also emphasizes the need for continuous small improvements and building a friendly, inclusive community that contributes to the project's growth.
Vladimir Iglovikov brings his extensive experience as a Kaggle Grandmaster, ex-Staff ML Engineer at Lyft, sharing valuable lessons and practical advice for anyone looking to enhance the adoption of their open-source projects.
Explore more about Albumentations and join the community at:
GitHub: https://github.com/albumentations-team/albumentations
Website: https://albumentations.ai/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/100504475
Twitter: https://x.com/albumentations
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the Possible with Graph - Q2 2024Neo4j
Neha Bajwa, Vice President of Product Marketing, Neo4j
Join us as we explore breakthrough innovations enabled by interconnected data and AI. Discover firsthand how organizations use relationships in data to uncover contextual insights and solve our most pressing challenges – from optimizing supply chains, detecting fraud, and improving customer experiences to accelerating drug discoveries.
Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...SOFTTECHHUB
The choice of an operating system plays a pivotal role in shaping our computing experience. For decades, Microsoft's Windows has dominated the market, offering a familiar and widely adopted platform for personal and professional use. However, as technological advancements continue to push the boundaries of innovation, alternative operating systems have emerged, challenging the status quo and offering users a fresh perspective on computing.
One such alternative that has garnered significant attention and acclaim is Nitrux Linux 3.5.0, a sleek, powerful, and user-friendly Linux distribution that promises to redefine the way we interact with our devices. With its focus on performance, security, and customization, Nitrux Linux presents a compelling case for those seeking to break free from the constraints of proprietary software and embrace the freedom and flexibility of open-source computing.
Epistemic Interaction - tuning interfaces to provide information for AI supportAlan Dix
Paper presented at SYNERGY workshop at AVI 2024, Genoa, Italy. 3rd June 2024
https://alandix.com/academic/papers/synergy2024-epistemic/
As machine learning integrates deeper into human-computer interactions, the concept of epistemic interaction emerges, aiming to refine these interactions to enhance system adaptability. This approach encourages minor, intentional adjustments in user behaviour to enrich the data available for system learning. This paper introduces epistemic interaction within the context of human-system communication, illustrating how deliberate interaction design can improve system understanding and adaptation. Through concrete examples, we demonstrate the potential of epistemic interaction to significantly advance human-computer interaction by leveraging intuitive human communication strategies to inform system design and functionality, offering a novel pathway for enriching user-system engagements.
Alt. GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using ...James Anderson
Effective Application Security in Software Delivery lifecycle using Deployment Firewall and DBOM
The modern software delivery process (or the CI/CD process) includes many tools, distributed teams, open-source code, and cloud platforms. Constant focus on speed to release software to market, along with the traditional slow and manual security checks has caused gaps in continuous security as an important piece in the software supply chain. Today organizations feel more susceptible to external and internal cyber threats due to the vast attack surface in their applications supply chain and the lack of end-to-end governance and risk management.
The software team must secure its software delivery process to avoid vulnerability and security breaches. This needs to be achieved with existing tool chains and without extensive rework of the delivery processes. This talk will present strategies and techniques for providing visibility into the true risk of the existing vulnerabilities, preventing the introduction of security issues in the software, resolving vulnerabilities in production environments quickly, and capturing the deployment bill of materials (DBOM).
Speakers:
Bob Boule
Robert Boule is a technology enthusiast with PASSION for technology and making things work along with a knack for helping others understand how things work. He comes with around 20 years of solution engineering experience in application security, software continuous delivery, and SaaS platforms. He is known for his dynamic presentations in CI/CD and application security integrated in software delivery lifecycle.
Gopinath Rebala
Gopinath Rebala is the CTO of OpsMx, where he has overall responsibility for the machine learning and data processing architectures for Secure Software Delivery. Gopi also has a strong connection with our customers, leading design and architecture for strategic implementations. Gopi is a frequent speaker and well-known leader in continuous delivery and integrating security into software delivery.
Essentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FMESafe Software
In this second installment of our Essentials of Automations webinar series, we’ll explore the landscape of triggers and actions, guiding you through the nuances of authoring and adapting workspaces for seamless automations. Gain an understanding of the full spectrum of triggers and actions available in FME, empowering you to enhance your workspaces for efficient automation.
We’ll kick things off by showcasing the most commonly used event-based triggers, introducing you to various automation workflows like manual triggers, schedules, directory watchers, and more. Plus, see how these elements play out in real scenarios.
Whether you’re tweaking your current setup or building from the ground up, this session will arm you with the tools and insights needed to transform your FME usage into a powerhouse of productivity. Join us to discover effective strategies that simplify complex processes, enhancing your productivity and transforming your data management practices with FME. Let’s turn complexity into clarity and make your workspaces work wonders!
GridMate - End to end testing is a critical piece to ensure quality and avoid...ThomasParaiso2
End to end testing is a critical piece to ensure quality and avoid regressions. In this session, we share our journey building an E2E testing pipeline for GridMate components (LWC and Aura) using Cypress, JSForce, FakerJS…
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 6DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 6. In this session, we will cover Test Automation with generative AI and Open AI.
UiPath Test Automation with generative AI and Open AI webinar offers an in-depth exploration of leveraging cutting-edge technologies for test automation within the UiPath platform. Attendees will delve into the integration of generative AI, a test automation solution, with Open AI advanced natural language processing capabilities.
Throughout the session, participants will discover how this synergy empowers testers to automate repetitive tasks, enhance testing accuracy, and expedite the software testing life cycle. Topics covered include the seamless integration process, practical use cases, and the benefits of harnessing AI-driven automation for UiPath testing initiatives. By attending this webinar, testers, and automation professionals can gain valuable insights into harnessing the power of AI to optimize their test automation workflows within the UiPath ecosystem, ultimately driving efficiency and quality in software development processes.
What will you get from this session?
1. Insights into integrating generative AI.
2. Understanding how this integration enhances test automation within the UiPath platform
3. Practical demonstrations
4. Exploration of real-world use cases illustrating the benefits of AI-driven test automation for UiPath
Topics covered:
What is generative AI
Test Automation with generative AI and Open AI.
UiPath integration with generative AI
Speaker:
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024Albert Hoitingh
In this session I delve into the encryption technology used in Microsoft 365 and Microsoft Purview. Including the concepts of Customer Key and Double Key Encryption.
Unlocking Productivity: Leveraging the Potential of Copilot in Microsoft 365, a presentation by Christoforos Vlachos, Senior Solutions Manager – Modern Workplace, Uni Systems
Dr. Sean Tan, Head of Data Science, Changi Airport Group
Discover how Changi Airport Group (CAG) leverages graph technologies and generative AI to revolutionize their search capabilities. This session delves into the unique search needs of CAG’s diverse passengers and customers, showcasing how graph data structures enhance the accuracy and relevance of AI-generated search results, mitigating the risk of “hallucinations” and improving the overall customer journey.
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1DianaGray10
This session provides introduction to UiPath Communication Mining, importance and platform overview. You will acquire a good understand of the phases in Communication Mining as we go over the platform with you. Topics covered:
• Communication Mining Overview
• Why is it important?
• How can it help today’s business and the benefits
• Phases in Communication Mining
• Demo on Platform overview
• Q/A
Pushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 daysAdtran
At WSTS 2024, Alon Stern explored the topic of parametric holdover and explained how recent research findings can be implemented in real-world PNT networks to achieve 100 nanoseconds of accuracy for up to 100 days.
zkStudyClub - Reef: Fast Succinct Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Regex ProofsAlex Pruden
This paper presents Reef, a system for generating publicly verifiable succinct non-interactive zero-knowledge proofs that a committed document matches or does not match a regular expression. We describe applications such as proving the strength of passwords, the provenance of email despite redactions, the validity of oblivious DNS queries, and the existence of mutations in DNA. Reef supports the Perl Compatible Regular Expression syntax, including wildcards, alternation, ranges, capture groups, Kleene star, negations, and lookarounds. Reef introduces a new type of automata, Skipping Alternating Finite Automata (SAFA), that skips irrelevant parts of a document when producing proofs without undermining soundness, and instantiates SAFA with a lookup argument. Our experimental evaluation confirms that Reef can generate proofs for documents with 32M characters; the proofs are small and cheap to verify (under a second).
Paper: https://eprint.iacr.org/2023/1886
zkStudyClub - Reef: Fast Succinct Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Regex Proofs
Optimal Control System Design
1. Introduction
Shooting method
Orbit transfer
Three-body problem
Optimal control and applications to aerospace
problems
E. Trélat
Université Pierre et Marie Curie (Paris 6), Laboratoire J.-L. Lions
and Institut Universitaire de France
6th European Congress of Mathematics, July 2012
E. Trélat
Optimal control and applications to aerospace problems
2. Introduction
Shooting method
Orbit transfer
Three-body problem
What is control theory?
Objective
Steer a system from an initial configuration to a final configuration.
Optimal control
One tries moreover to minimize a given criterion.
Stabilization
A trajectory being planned, one tries to stabilize it in order to make it robust, insensitive
to perturbations.
Observability
Reconstruct the full state of the system from partial data.
E. Trélat
Optimal control and applications to aerospace problems
3. Introduction
Shooting method
Orbit transfer
Control
theory
and
applica0ons
Three-body problem
Application fields are numerous:
Applica0on
domains
of
control
theory:
Mechanics
Biology,
medicine
Vehicles
(guidance,
dampers,
ABS,
ESP,
…),
Aeronau<cs,
aerospace
(shu=le,
satellites),
robo<cs
Predator-‐prey
systems,
bioreactors,
epidemiology,
medicine
(peacemakers,
laser
surgery)
Electricity,
electronics
RLC
circuits,
thermostats,
regula<on,
refrigera<on,
computers,
internet
and
telecommunica<ons
in
general,
photography
and
digital
video
Economics
Gain
op<miza<on,
control
of
financial
flux,
Market
prevision
Chemistry
Chemical
kine<cs,
engineering
process,
petroleum,
dis<lla<on,
petrochemical
industry
E. Trélat
Optimal control and applications to aerospace problems
4. Introduction
Shooting method
Orbit transfer
Three-body problem
Here we focus on applications of control theory to problems of
aerospace.
q3
2
0
−2
30
40
20
10
20
0
0
−10
−20
−20
−30
−40
q2
−40
5
q1
0
q3
q2
20
0
−20
−40
−60
−40
−20
0
20
q1
E. Trélat
40
−5
−50
0
q2
50
Optimal control and applications to aerospace problems
5. Introduction
Shooting method
Orbit transfer
Three-body problem
The orbit transfer problem with low thrust
Controlled Kepler equation
¨
q = −q
µ
F
+
r3
m
q ∈ I 3 : position, r = |q|, F : thrust, m mass:
R
˙
m = −β|F |
Orbit transfer
Maximal thrust constraint
2
2
2
|F | = (u1 + u2 + u3 )1/2
Fmax
0.1N
E. Trélat
from an initial excentric inclinated orbit
to a geostationary orbit.
Optimal control and applications to aerospace problems
6. Introduction
Shooting method
Orbit transfer
Three-body problem
The orbit transfer problem with low thrust
Controlled Kepler equation
¨
q = −q
µ
F
+
r3
m
q ∈ I 3 : position, r = |q|, F : thrust, m mass:
R
˙
m = −β|F |
Orbit transfer
Maximal thrust constraint
2
2
2
|F | = (u1 + u2 + u3 )1/2
Fmax
0.1N
from an initial excentric inclinated orbit
to a geostationary orbit.
Controllability properties studied in
B. Bonnard, J.-B. Caillau, E. Trélat, Geometric optimal control of elliptic Keplerian orbits, Discrete Contin.
Dyn. Syst. Ser. B 5, 4 (2005), 929–956.
B. Bonnard, L. Faubourg, E. Trélat, Mécanique céleste et contrôle de systèmes spatiaux, Math. & Appl. 51,
Springer Verlag (2006), XIV, 276 pages.
E. Trélat
Optimal control and applications to aerospace problems
7. Introduction
Shooting method
Orbit transfer
Three-body problem
Modelization in terms of an optimal control problem
„
State: x(t) =
«
q(t)
˙
q(t)
Control: u(t) = F (t)
Optimal control problem
˙
x(t) = f (x(t), u(t)),
x(0) = x0 ,
x(t) ∈ I n ,
R
x(T ) = x1 ,
Z
min C(T , u),
u(t) ∈ Ω ⊂ I m ,
R
where C(T , u) =
T
f 0 (x(t), u(t))dt
0
E. Trélat
Optimal control and applications to aerospace problems
8. Introduction
Shooting method
Orbit transfer
Three-body problem
Pontryagin Maximum Principle
Optimal control problem
˙
x(t) = f (x(t), u(t)), x(0) = x0 ∈ I n ,
R
x(T ) = x1 , min C(T , u),
u(t) ∈ Ω ⊂ I m ,
R
Z T
where C(T , u) =
f 0 (x(t), u(t))dt.
0
Pontryagin Maximum Principle
Every minimizing trajectory x(·) is the projection of an extremal (x(·), p(·), p0 , u(·))
solution of
˙
x=
∂H
∂H
˙
, p=−
,
∂p
∂x
H(x, p, p0 , u) = max H(x, p, p0 , v ),
v ∈Ω
where H(x, p, p0 , u) = p, f (x, u) + p0 f 0 (x, u).
An extremal is said normal whenever p0 = 0, and abnormal whenever p0 = 0.
E. Trélat
Optimal control and applications to aerospace problems
9. Introduction
Shooting method
Orbit transfer
Three-body problem
Pontryagin Maximum Principle
H(x, p, p0 , u) = p, f (x, u) + p0 f 0 (x, u).
Pontryagin Maximum Principle
Every minimizing trajectory x(·) is the projection of an extremal (x(·), p(·), p0 , u(·))
solution of
˙
x=
∂H
∂H
˙
, p=−
,
∂p
∂x
H(x, p, p0 , u) = max H(x, p, p0 , v ).
v ∈Ω
u(t) = u(x(t), p(t))
“
locally, e.g. under the strict Legendre
assumption:
E. Trélat
”
∂2H
(x, p, u) negative definite
2
∂u
Optimal control and applications to aerospace problems
10. Introduction
Shooting method
Orbit transfer
Three-body problem
Pontryagin Maximum Principle
H(x, p, p0 , u) = p, f (x, u) + p0 f 0 (x, u).
Pontryagin Maximum Principle
Every minimizing trajectory x(·) is the projection of an extremal (x(·), p(·), p0 , u(·))
solution of
˙
x=
∂H
∂H
˙
, p=−
,
∂p
∂x
H(x, p, p0 , u) = max H(x, p, p0 , v ).
v ∈Ω
u(t) = u(x(t), p(t))
“
locally, e.g. under the strict Legendre
assumption:
E. Trélat
”
∂2H
(x, p, u) negative definite
2
∂u
Optimal control and applications to aerospace problems
11. Introduction
Shooting method
Orbit transfer
Three-body problem
Shooting method:
Extremals (x, p) are solutions of
∂H
(x, p), x(0) = x0 ,
∂p
∂H
˙
p=−
(x, p), p(0) = p0 ,
∂x
˙
x=
(x(T ) = x1 ),
Exponential mapping
expx0 (t, p0 ) = x(t, x0 , p0 ),
(extremal flow)
where the optimal control maximizes the Hamiltonian.
−→ Shooting method: determine p0 s.t. expx0 (t, p0 ) = x1 .
Remark
- PMP = first-order necessary condition for optimality.
- Necessary / sufficient (local) second-order conditions: conjugate points.
→ test if expx0 (t, ·) is an immersion at p0 .
E. Trélat
Optimal control and applications to aerospace problems
12. Introduction
Shooting method
Orbit transfer
Three-body problem
There exist other numerical approaches to solve optimal control problems:
direct methods: discretize the whole problem ⇒ finite-dimensional nonlinear
optimization problem with constraints.
Hamilton-Jacobi methods.
The shooting method is called an indirect method.
In the present aerospace applications, the use of shooting methods is priviledged in
general because of their very good numerical accuracy.
BUT: difficult to make converge... (Newton method)
To improve their performances and widen their domain of applicability, optimal control
tools must be combined with other techniques:
geometric tools ⇒ geometric optimal control
continuation or homotopy methods
dynamical systems theory
E. Trélat
Optimal control and applications to aerospace problems
13. Introduction
Shooting method
Orbit transfer
Three-body problem
Orbit transfer, minimal time
Maximum Principle ⇒ the extremals (x, p) are solutions of
˙
x=
∂H
, x(0) = x0 , x(T ) = x1 ,
∂p
˙
p=−
∂H
, p(0) = p0 ,
∂x
with an optimal control saturating the constraint: u(t) = Fmax .
−→ Shooting method: determine p0 s.t. x(T ) = x1 ,
combined with a homotopy on Fmax → p0 (Fmax )
Heuristic on tf :
tf (Fmax ) · Fmax
cste.
(the optimal trajectories are "straight lines",
Bonnard-Caillau 2009)
(Caillau, Gergaud, Haberkorn, Martinon, Noailles, ...)
E. Trélat
Optimal control and applications to aerospace problems
14. Introduction
Shooting method
Orbit transfer
Three-body problem
Orbit transfer, minimal time
P0 = 11625 km, |e0 | = 0.75, i0 = 7o , Pf = 42165 km
Fmax = 6 Newton
!4
1
x 10
30
arcsh det(! x)
q3
2
0
−2
40
20
10
20
0
0
−10
−20
!1
−20
−30
0
100
200
300
400
500
300
400
500
t
!3
−40
−40
q2
0
5
6
q1
x 10
5
"n!1
4
3
20
3
q
q2
2
0
1
0
0
0
100
200
t
−20
−40
−60
−40
−20
0
20
40
q1
Minimal time: 141.6 hours (
−5
−50
0
q
50
2
6 days). First conjugate time: 522.07 hours.
E. Trélat
Optimal control and applications to aerospace problems
15. Introduction
Shooting method
Orbit transfer
Three-body problem
Main tool used: continuation (homotopy) method
→ continuity of the optimal solution with respect to a parameter λ
Theoretical framework (sensitivity analysis):
expx0 ,λ (T , p0 (λ)) = x1
Local feasibility is ensured:
Global feasibility is ensured:
in the absence of conjugate points.
in the absence of abnormal minimizers.
↓
↓
this holds true for generic systems having
more than 3 controls
(Chitour-Jean-T, J. Differential Geom., 2006)
Numerical test of Jacobi fields.
E. Trélat
Optimal control and applications to aerospace problems
16. Introduction
Shooting method
Orbit transfer
Three-body problem
Ongoing work with EADS Astrium:
Minimal consumption transfer for launchers Ariane V and next
Ariane VI (third atmospheric phase, strong thrust)
Objective: automatic and instantaneous software.
continuation on the curvature of the Earth (flat Earth –> round Earth)
M. Cerf, T. Haberkorn, E. Trélat, Continuation from a flat to a round Earth model in the coplanar orbit
transfer problem, Optimal Appl. Cont. Methods (2012).
eclipse constraints → state constraints, hybrid systems
T. Haberkorn, E. Trélat, Convergence results for smooth regularizations of hybrid nonlinear optimal
control problems, SIAM J. Control Optim. (2011).
E. Trélat
Optimal control and applications to aerospace problems
17. Introduction
Shooting method
Orbit transfer
Three-body problem
Optimal control
A challenge (urgent!!)
Collecting space debris:
22000 debris of more than 10 cm
(cataloged)
500000 debris between 1 and 10 cm
(not cataloged)
millions of smaller debris
In low orbit
→ difficult mathematical problems combining optimal control,
continuous / discrete / combinatorial optimization
(PhD of Max Cerf, to be defended in 2012)
Ongoing studies, CNES, EADS, NASA
E. Trélat
Optimal control and applications to aerospace problems
18. Introduction
Shooting method
Orbit transfer
Three-body problem
Optimal control
A challenge (urgent!!)
Collecting space debris:
22000 debris of more than 10 cm
(cataloged)
500000 debris between 1 and 10 cm
(not cataloged)
millions of smaller debris
Around the geostationary orbit
→ difficult mathematical problems combining optimal control,
continuous / discrete / combinatorial optimization
(PhD of Max Cerf, to be defended in 2012)
Ongoing studies, CNES, EADS, NASA
E. Trélat
Optimal control and applications to aerospace problems
19. Introduction
Shooting method
Orbit transfer
Three-body problem
Optimal control
A challenge (urgent!!)
Collecting space debris:
22000 debris of more than 10 cm
(cataloged)
500000 debris between 1 and 10 cm
(not cataloged)
millions of smaller debris
The space garbage collectors
→ difficult mathematical problems combining optimal control,
continuous / discrete / combinatorial optimization
(PhD of Max Cerf, to be defended in 2012)
Ongoing studies, CNES, EADS, NASA
E. Trélat
Optimal control and applications to aerospace problems
20. Introduction
Shooting method
Orbit transfer
Three-body problem
The circular restricted three-body problem
Dynamics of a body with negligible mass in the gravitational field of two masses m1
and m2 (primaries) having circular orbits:
Equations of motion in the rotating frame
∂Φ
∂x
∂Φ
¨
˙
y + 2x =
∂y
∂Φ
¨
z=
∂z
¨
˙
x − 2y =
with
Φ(x, y , z) =
x2 + y2 1 − µ
µ
µ(1 − µ)
+
,
+ +
2
r1
r2
2
and
q
(x + µ)2 + y 2 + z 2 ,
q
Main references
(x − 1 + µ)2 + y 2 + z 2 .
r1 =
r2 =
E. Trélat
American team:
Koon, Lo, Marsden, Ross...
Spanish team:
Gomez, Jorba, Llibre, Masdemont, Simo...
Optimal control and applications to aerospace problems
21. Introduction
Shooting method
Orbit transfer
Three-body problem
Lagrange points
˙
˙
˙
Jacobi integral J = 2Φ − (x 2 + y 2 + z 2 )
→ 5-dimensional energy manifold
Five equilibrium points:
3 collinear equilibrium points: L1 , L2 , L3 (unstable);
2 equilateral equilibrium points: L4 , L5 (stable).
(see Szebehely 1967)
Extension of a Lyapunov theorem (Moser) ⇒ same behavior than the linearized
system around Lagrange points.
E. Trélat
Optimal control and applications to aerospace problems
22. Introduction
Shooting method
Orbit transfer
Three-body problem
Lagrange points in the Earth-Sun system
From Moser’s theorem:
L1 , L2 , L3 : unstable.
L4 , L5 : stable.
E. Trélat
Optimal control and applications to aerospace problems
24. Introduction
Shooting method
Orbit transfer
Three-body problem
Examples of objects near Lagrange points
Points L4 and L5 (stable) in the
Sun-Jupiter system:
trojan asteroids
E. Trélat
Optimal control and applications to aerospace problems
25. Introduction
Shooting method
Orbit transfer
Three-body problem
Examples of objects near Lagrange points
Sun-Earth system:
Point L1: SOHO
Point L3: planet X...
Point L2: JWST
E. Trélat
Optimal control and applications to aerospace problems
26. Introduction
Shooting method
Orbit transfer
Three-body problem
Periodic orbits
From a Lyapunov-Poincaré theorem, there exist:
a 2-parameter family of periodic orbits around L1 , L2 , L3
a 3-parameter family of periodic orbits around L4 , L5
Among them:
planar orbits called Lyapunov orbits;
3D orbits diffeomorphic to circles called halo orbits;
other 3D orbits with more complicated shape called
Lissajous orbits.
(see Richardson 1980, Gomez Masdemont Simo 1998)
E. Trélat
Optimal control and applications to aerospace problems
27. Introduction
Shooting method
Orbit transfer
Three-body problem
Examples of the use of halo orbits:
Orbit of SOHO around L1
Orbit of the probe Genesis (2001–2004)
(requires control by stabilization)
E. Trélat
Optimal control and applications to aerospace problems
28. Introduction
Shooting method
Orbit transfer
Three-body problem
Invariant manifolds
Invariant manifolds (stable and unstable) of periodic orbits:
4-dimensional tubes (S 3 × I inside the 5-dimensional energy manifold.
R)
(they play the role of separatrices)
–> invariant "tubes", kinds of "gravity currents" ⇒ low-cost trajectories
E. Trélat
Optimal control and applications to aerospace problems
29. Introduction
Shooting method
Orbit transfer
Three-body problem
Invariant manifolds
Invariant manifolds (stable and unstable) of periodic orbits:
4-dimensional tubes (S 3 × I inside the 5-dimensional energy manifold.
R)
(they play the role of separatrices)
–> invariant "tubes", kinds of "gravity currents" ⇒ low-cost trajectories
Cartography ⇒ design of low-cost interplanetary missions
E. Trélat
Optimal control and applications to aerospace problems
30. Introduction
Shooting method
Orbit transfer
Three-body problem
Meanwhile...
Back to the Moon
⇒ lunar station: intermediate point for interplanetary
missions
Challenge: design low-cost trajectories to the Moon
and flying over all the surface of the Moon.
Mathematics used:
dynamical systems theory, differential geometry,
ergodic theory, control, scientific computing, optimization
E. Trélat
Optimal control and applications to aerospace problems
31. Introduction
Shooting method
Orbit transfer
Three-body problem
Eight Lissajous orbits
(PhD thesis of G. Archambeau)
Periodic orbits around L1 et L2 (Earth-Moon system) having the shape of an eight:
⇒ Eight-shaped invariant manifolds:
E. Trélat
Optimal control and applications to aerospace problems
32. Introduction
Shooting method
Orbit transfer
Three-body problem
Invariant manifolds of Eight Lissajous orbits
We observe numerically that they enjoy two nice properties:
1) Stability in long time of invariant manifolds
Invariant manifolds of an Eight Lissajous orbit:
Invariant manifolds of a halo orbit:
→ chaotic structure in long time
→ global structure conserved
(numerical validation by computation of local Lyapunov exponents)
E. Trélat
Optimal control and applications to aerospace problems
33. Introduction
Shooting method
Orbit transfer
Three-body problem
Invariant manifolds of Eight Lissajous orbits
We observe numerically that they enjoy two nice properties:
2) Flying over almost all the surface of the Moon
Invariant manifolds of an eight-shaped orbit around the
Moon:
oscillations around the Moon
global stability in long time
minimal distance to the Moon:
1500 km.
G. Archambeau, P. Augros, E.T.,
Eight Lissajous orbits in the
Earth-Moon system,
MathS in Action (2011).
E. Trélat
Optimal control and applications to aerospace problems
34. Introduction
Shooting method
Orbit transfer
Three-body problem
Perspectives
Partnership between EADS Astrium Space Transportation (les Mureaux, France) and
FSMP (Fondation Sciences Mathématiques de Paris):
→ starting next october 2012
→ scientific collaboration with PhD’s, postdocs
Planning low-cost missions to the Moon or interplanetary one, using the gravity
corridors and other gravitational properties
mixed optimization:
interplanetary missions: compromise between low cost and long transfer
time; gravitational effects (swing-by)
optimal conception of space vehicles
collecting space debris
optimal placement problems (vehicle design, sensors)
Inverse problems: reconstructing a thermic, acoustic, electromagnetic
environment (coupling ODE’s / PDE’s)
Robustness problems
...
E. Trélat
Optimal control and applications to aerospace problems
35. Introduction
Shooting method
Orbit transfer
Three-body problem
Invariant manifolds of eight-shaped Lissajous orbits
Φ(·, t): transition matrix along a reference trajectory x(·)
∆ > 0.
Local Lyapunov exponent
λ(t, ∆) =
„
«
q
1
ln maximal eigenvalue of Φ(t + ∆, t)ΦT (t + ∆, t)
∆
Simulations with ∆ = 1 day.
E. Trélat
Optimal control and applications to aerospace problems
36. Introduction
Shooting method
Orbit transfer
LLE of an eight-shaped Lissajous orbit:
Three-body problem
LLE of an halo orbit:
LLE of an invariant manifold of an eight-shaped
Lissajous orbit:
E. Trélat
LLE of an invariant manifold of an halo orbit:
Optimal control and applications to aerospace problems