ODIN Final Event - Supporting the research lifecycle: Discovery and Analysis

•Download as PPTX, PDF•

1 like•973 views

Rachael Kotarski The British Library Presentation delivered at the ODIN Final Event in Amsterdam (Netherlands) on Wednesday, September 24, 2014: ORCID and DataCite: Towards Holistic Open Research. More info: www.odin-project.eu

Data & Analytics

ODIN – ORCID and DATACITE Interoperability Network
Title
This project has received funding from the European
Union's Seventh Framework Programme for research,
technological development and demonstration under
grant agreement no. 312788

Supporting the research lifecycle:
Discovery  Analysis
Rachael Kotarski (British Library)
ORCID and DataCite: Towards Holistic Open Research, September 24 2014

Scenario 1: Starting from the data
• I am looking for data
to combine with my
own for meta-analysis
• I search a subject-data
centre for data of
interest
• I find interesting data
and see that the
author is linked
ORCID and DataCite: Towards Holistic Open Research, September 24 2014

• Following the link I end up at the data creator’s ORCID record
• Here I can see plenty more of their data and publications, across
ORCID and DataCite: Towards Holistic Open Research, September 24 2014
many data centres
Not possible before ODIN

How has ODIN helped this?
• Creation of a DataCite claim tool for ORCID
• Allows ORCID users to claim datasets with DOIs from DataCite
ORCID and DataCite: Towards Holistic Open Research, September 24 2014

How has ODIN helped this?
• Linking from a data centre landing page is promoted with out work on
integrating identifiers into archive workflows
ORCID and DataCite: Towards Holistic Open Research, September 24 2014

Scenario 2: Starting from the literature
• This research paper is an important
new advancement in my research
area
• But I now have more questions
• I look at the citations, and see that
they cite the datasets they have used.
There are 2 of them.
• DataCite DOIs have allowed me to
access the data for the citation
ORCID and DataCite: Towards Holistic Open Research, September 24 2014

• The data citation has taken me to
a page that gives more details
about the dataset
• Details about this data link into
more papers and further datasets
• These datasets are relevant to my
field, but wont quite help me
answer the new questions I have.
• How can I find more data?
ORCID and DataCite: Towards Holistic Open Research, September 24 2014

• I see the creators names are
linked
• I click them and it takes me to
their ORCID record
• Their current work has moved
away from the question I’m
interested in
• But I find older datasets by these
creators that seem very relevant
ORCID and DataCite: Towards Holistic Open Research, September 24 2014
Not possible before ODIN

• The DOI takes me to a new
data centre
• I see a graph of the authors
on this dataset and how they
link to various publications
and datasets
• On clicking around, I see that
the creators of these older
datasets have previously
worked with similar
collaborators to me
ORCID and DataCite: Towards Holistic Open Research, September 24 2014
Not possible before ODIN

• I follow the links back to their
ORCID profiles and see their
work touches on some of the
questions I’m now starting to
ask
• I have an idea that would help
to pursue those questions, so I
contact them to find out more
about their current work
ORCID and DataCite: Towards Holistic Open Research, September 24 2014
Not possible before ODIN

Clarivate was selected as the citation provider for the 2018 Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) evaluation. The role involved preparing, submitting, and checking citation data from Clarivate's databases to support the ERA evaluation. Clarivate mapped institutional publication records to citations in the Web of Science and provided tagging portals and APIs to help with this process. They also offered seminars and support to help universities understand the citation data and benchmarks. Moving forward, Clarivate wants to leverage feedback to better support the quality of Australian research.

Searching beyond datasets in the Social Sciences

GESIS

1) State of the art search capabilities at GESIS include curated datasets with metadata and additional materials as well as harvested datasets and linking infrastructure between items. 2) Integrated search allows linking of papers and datasets in both directions to help users. 3) However, social scientists often want to reuse specific parts of datasets, like questions on a particular topic, requiring more fine-grained retrievability and linkages within datasets.

FAIR for the future: embracing all things data

ARDC

Implementing Archivematica, research data network

Jisc RDM

This presentation discusses implementing Archivematica for preserving research data at the University of York and Hull. It covers background on the project, challenges implementing Archivematica, issues with identifying unknown file formats in research data, and future plans to move from proof of concept to production. The project tested pulling metadata from systems into Archivematica for ingest and explored packaging data for long-term preservation and access. A major challenge was the large number of unidentified file formats, which the project is addressing by developing new file format signatures.

Enabling FAIR Data: TAG B Authoring Guidelines

Anita de Waard

The document summarizes the work of the AGU FAIR Data Targeted Adoption Group B, which focused on publishers in Earth and space sciences. The group met frequently and developed a shared set of author guidelines for data availability statements and citations that were signed by participating publishers. The guidelines require authors to deposit data in FAIR-aligned repositories, cite data in articles following joint data citation principles, and include a data availability statement describing how data can be accessed and reused. Exceptions are made for cases where data access is restricted. The group still needs to address implementation challenges and resolve how to link the guidelines to other publisher resources and ensure ongoing oversight.

- Research data matters to libraries because it is increasingly being produced and collected by researchers, and there are growing requirements to manage and preserve it. - A survey found that while most researchers currently manage their own data, there is a trend toward using institutional repositories and libraries more for long-term preservation. - Libraries are well-suited to help with research data management because of their experience organizing and describing information over long periods of time, but there are also challenges due to differences across disciplines in how data is defined and treated. - As funders and journals require better data sharing practices, libraries have an opportunity to take a more active role in helping researchers and institutions capture, describe, and manage research data over

Publishers and RDM

Centre for Digital Scholarship, Leiden University Libraries

Building Confidence: Training Librarians in Research Data Management

Robin Rice

THOR Workshop - Data Publishing Elsevier

Maaike Duine

Elsevier supports researchers in sharing their data through several programs and services: 1. A data-linking program connects articles to over 60 domain-specific data repositories through in-article data accession numbers and banners. 2. Mendeley Data is Elsevier's research data repository, allowing researchers to store, share and publish research data with a DOI and link to related articles. 3. In-article data visualization tools display plot data from supplementary materials in journals, allowing readers to access, explore and download underlying data.

THOR Workshop - Introduction

Maaike Duine

The document discusses the THOR project, which aims to place Persistent Identifiers (PIDs) at the fingertips of researchers and integrate them into existing research services and outputs. The goals are to uniquely attribute work to researchers and make PID use the default across the research lifecycle. The project focuses on biological sciences, earth sciences, physical sciences, social sciences, and humanities. It provides examples of how PIDs can improve credit for researchers, discoverability and reuse of data and publications, demonstrate value for data centers, improve evidence for publishers, and measure impact for funders.

Swimming upstream: libraries and open scholarship

London South Bank University

Stop press: should embargo conditions apply to metadata?

Jisc RDM

Open data sources in VOSviewer

Nees Jan van Eck

Why would a publisher care about open data?

Anita de Waard

A publisher would care about open data for several reasons: 1) Open data increases the value of all parts of the web by allowing programs, not just people, to utilize the data through interconnecting and joining it. 2) Publishers are evolving from linear supply chains focused on content delivery to users, to becoming marketplaces that optimize the number of interactions between users through networked open science. 3) The future of publishing involves networked open science where data is openly accessible, annotated with metadata, and linked together in research objects, increasing findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability of research outputs.

Who will use the open data? Mark Humphries keynote

Jisc RDM

Authority files - Jisc Digital Festival 2014

Jisc

This document summarizes a workshop on authority files. It discusses how authority files can transform from library silos to a web of linked data by uniquely identifying entities like people, publications, organizations, and connecting them using identifiers. Four use cases are presented: developing a repository authority file, enhancing a journal authority file to track open access evolution, integrating existing authority files to make cultural data web compliant, and using authority files to enable new analyses and business intelligence from research information systems. The benefits of authority files for discovery, reliability, accountability, and efficiency are outlined. An example of crosswalking different authority files is also provided. The document concludes with an opinion poll on authority file topics.

Supporting the development of a national Research Data Discovery Service – a ...

EDINA, University of Edinburgh

In order to be reused, research data must be discoverable. The EPSRC Research Data Expectations* requires research organisations to maintain a data catalogue to record metadata about research data generated by EPSRC-funded research projects. Universities are increasingly making research data assets available through repositories or other data portals. The requirement for a UK research data discovery service has grown as universities become more involved in RDM and capacity develops.

Publishing the Full Research Data Lifecycle

Anita de Waard

This document discusses strategies for supporting open science through the full research cycle and data/software preservation. It outlines current practices for managing, storing, publishing, and reusing research data and software. It proposes improvements like requiring researchers to post datasets to repositories under embargo linked to any subsequent publications to reduce workload, better track outputs, and improve data linking and availability. The goal is to make data sharing and open science practices more seamless and effective.

Building a collaborative RDM community, research data network

Jisc RDM

This document summarizes Dr. Marta Teperek's presentation on building a collaborative research data management (RDM) community. The presentation covered how not to start RDM services by mandating data sharing, and instead focusing on the benefits of sharing. It discussed Cambridge University's democratic approach to developing RDM services by empowering researchers, and the positive feedback received. Collaboration, open communication, and shaping services and policies with researchers were emphasized as key to success.

BioSharing - Update - Feb2016

Susanna-Assunta Sansone

Collaboratively creating a network of ideas, data and software

Anita de Waard

Anita de Waard discusses collectively creating networks to connect ideas, data, and software. This includes work by Elsevier to build a knowledge graph connecting 14 million articles and ongoing efforts to link papers to datasets through various partnerships. De Waard also discusses evaluating data discoverability and the need to consider software as a knowledge object and pay for open infrastructure through new funding models. The goal is to enable sharing of knowledge globally through interconnected systems and partnerships.

Stevan Harnad: Open Access - Open Data: similarities and differences

"Open Access - Open Data" conference, 13th/14th December, 2010

Open Access (OA) means free online access to the 2.5 million articles published every year in the world's 25,000 peer-reviewed scholarly and scientific research journals. OA can be provided in two ways: To provide "Green OA," authors self-archive the final refereed drafts of their articles in their institutional OA repositories immediately upon acceptance for publication (by conventional, non-OA journals). To provide "Gold OA," authors publish their articles in OA journals that make all their articles free online immediately upon publication. (Sometimes a fee is charged to the author's institution for Gold OA.) Because of the benefits of OA (in terms of maximized visibility, accessibility, uptake, usage and impact) to research, researchers, their institutions and the taxpayers that fund them, institutions and funders worldwide are increasingly mandating (i.e. requiring) Green OA self-archiving. Gold OA publishing cannot be mandated by authors' institutions and funders, but universal Green OA self-archiving mandates may eventually lead to a global transition to Gold OA publishing; it depends on whether and how long subscriptions remain sustainable as the means of covering the costs of print and online publication; if subscriptions become unsustainable, authors' institutions will pay journal publishers for peer review out of a portion of their annual windfall subscription cancellation savings. Data-archiving cannot be mandated, because researchers must be allowed the exclusive right to mine their data they have collected if they wish; but as Green OA self-archiving grows, data-archiving too will grow, because of their natural complementarity and the power of global collaboration to accelerate and enhance research progress.

Research data management workshop april12 2016

Rebecca Raworth, MLIS

Rebecca Raworth presented a workshop on research data management. The presentation covered: - Why research data management plans are important, such as satisfying funder requirements and increasing research efficiency. - Current requirements for data management plans in Canada. - Tools for research data management, including Portage for creating data management plans and Dataverse for data storage and access. - Best practices for organizing, documenting, storing and sharing research data, including using metadata standards, file naming conventions, and choosing appropriate data repositories.

The Rocky Road to Reuse

Anita de Waard

This document discusses challenges and proposed solutions for improving data sharing, integration, and reuse in research. It outlines the current research data lifecycle and issues like a lack of linking between data and publications. A proposal is made for researchers to publish data in repositories under embargo and automatically notify funders, then link the data to publications. The document also describes efforts by organizations like FORCE11, the National Data Service, and RDA to improve data search, linking, and publishing through collaboration. Key areas discussed include electronic lab notebooks, data repositories, search, linking data to publications, and citation.

Open data sources in VOSviewer

Nees Jan van Eck

ORCID in platform research lifecycle products -Elsevier (C. Shillum)

ORCID, Inc

This document discusses how Elsevier products integrate with ORCID to help researchers build and promote their ORCID profiles throughout the research lifecycle. It provides details on how ORCID profiles are incorporated in Elsevier's publishing, search and discovery, and research intelligence tools. Key points include gathering ORCIDs during manuscript submission, depositing ORCIDs in Crossref metadata, linking Scopus author profiles to ORCIDs, and enabling Pure users to link their profiles and automatically update ORCID records.

Information in the research lifecycle

guest8ec5ab

The document discusses the information needs and skills of researchers at different stages of their careers. It outlines 7 stages from masters students to experts. For each stage, it describes the typical roles and responsibilities as well as information needs such as finding, managing, creating, and disseminating information. The document also discusses support and training needs to help researchers maximize the impact of their work throughout the research lifecycle.

What's hot

Why does research data matter to libraries

Jisc RDM

Publishers and RDM

Centre for Digital Scholarship, Leiden University Libraries

Building Confidence: Training Librarians in Research Data Management

Robin Rice

THOR Workshop - Data Publishing Elsevier

Maaike Duine

THOR Workshop - Introduction

Maaike Duine

Swimming upstream: libraries and open scholarship

London South Bank University

Stop press: should embargo conditions apply to metadata?

Jisc RDM

Open data sources in VOSviewer

Nees Jan van Eck

Why would a publisher care about open data?

Anita de Waard

Who will use the open data? Mark Humphries keynote

Jisc RDM

Authority files - Jisc Digital Festival 2014

Jisc

Supporting the development of a national Research Data Discovery Service – a ...

EDINA, University of Edinburgh

Publishing the Full Research Data Lifecycle

Anita de Waard

Building a collaborative RDM community, research data network

Jisc RDM

BioSharing - Update - Feb2016

Susanna-Assunta Sansone

Collaboratively creating a network of ideas, data and software

Anita de Waard

Stevan Harnad: Open Access - Open Data: similarities and differences

"Open Access - Open Data" conference, 13th/14th December, 2010

Research data management workshop april12 2016

Rebecca Raworth, MLIS

The Rocky Road to Reuse

Anita de Waard

Open data sources in VOSviewer

Nees Jan van Eck

What's hot (20)

Why does research data matter to libraries

Publishers and RDM

Building Confidence: Training Librarians in Research Data Management

THOR Workshop - Data Publishing Elsevier

THOR Workshop - Introduction

Swimming upstream: libraries and open scholarship

Stop press: should embargo conditions apply to metadata?

Open data sources in VOSviewer

Why would a publisher care about open data?

Who will use the open data? Mark Humphries keynote

Authority files - Jisc Digital Festival 2014

Supporting the development of a national Research Data Discovery Service – a ...

Publishing the Full Research Data Lifecycle

Building a collaborative RDM community, research data network

BioSharing - Update - Feb2016

Collaboratively creating a network of ideas, data and software

Stevan Harnad: Open Access - Open Data: similarities and differences

Research data management workshop april12 2016

The Rocky Road to Reuse

Open data sources in VOSviewer

Viewers also liked

ORCID in platform research lifecycle products -Elsevier (C. Shillum)

ORCID, Inc

Information in the research lifecycle

guest8ec5ab

Attribution in the Research Lifecycle: Persistent identifiers

ORCID, Inc

Managing data throughout the research lifecycle

Marieke Guy

This document summarizes a presentation about managing data throughout the research lifecycle. It discusses the stages of the research lifecycle, including planning, data creation, documentation, storage, sharing, and preservation. It provides examples of research lifecycle models and addresses key questions to consider at each stage, such as what formats to use, how to document data, where to store it, and how to share and preserve it. The presentation emphasizes making informed decisions about data management and talking to colleagues for support and advice.

From research life cycle to networks: The role of the library

Cameron Neylon

MANTRA Research Data Lifecycle

EDINA, University of Edinburgh

The document provides information about MANTRA, a free online course for research data management created by the University of Edinburgh. MANTRA teaches best practices for managing research data through open educational modules aligned with the research data lifecycle. It is available for reuse and repurposing under an open license. The course covers topics like data planning, organization, documentation, storage, security, and sharing.

Overview of orcid in research lifecycle (M. Buys)

ORCID, Inc

ORCID provides researchers with a unique digital identifier that can be used throughout the research lifecycle. Individual researchers register for free ORCID IDs and link them to their work at institutions, funders, and publishers. Organizations join ORCID as members and integrate ORCID IDs into their systems to better connect information on researchers, institutions, funding, and publications. ORCID works with these organizations to ensure persistent identifiers are connected across research workflows and platforms.

Viewers also liked (7)

ORCID in platform research lifecycle products -Elsevier (C. Shillum)

Information in the research lifecycle

Attribution in the Research Lifecycle: Persistent identifiers

Managing data throughout the research lifecycle

From research life cycle to networks: The role of the library

MANTRA Research Data Lifecycle

Overview of orcid in research lifecycle (M. Buys)

Similar to ODIN Final Event - Supporting the research lifecycle: Discovery and Analysis

Digging into assessment data: Tips, tricks, and tools of the trade.

Lynn Connaway

Identifiers for Researchers and Data: Increasing Attribution and Discovery– J...

ALISS

Trends in-connecting-research-sgd-2013

Sanjeev Deshmukh

This document discusses trends and importance of research in the current scenario. It discusses connecting research to oneself, one's institute, society and industry. It also discusses the concept of a "connected researcher" and trends related to collaboration, social media, and alternative metrics for measuring research impact. Connected researchers leverage tools like social media to build networks, get feedback, and disseminate their work more widely.

Orcid Rails Hydra Plug-in outreach meeting May_21_2014

Rick Johnson

Hydra ORCID Plug-in

ORCID, Inc

ORCID identifiers in repositories The ORCID identifier has been incorporated into numerous repository platforms. This session will offer a discussion of integration points, policy issues, data flow between systems, researcher participation, discovered opportunities, and demonstrations by universities, research organizations, and vendors. Moderator: Salvatore Mele, Head of Open Access at CERN Presenters: Robin Haw, Scientific Associate and Reactome Outreach Coordinator, Department of Informatics and Bio-computing, OICR Rick Johnson, Co-Program Director, Digital Library Initiatives and Scholarship E-Research and Digital Initiatives, Notre Dame University Ann Campion Riley, Associate Director for Access, Collections and Technical Services, University of Missouri Library Sarah Shreeves, Coordinator, Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (IDEALS), University Library. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Michael Witt, Head, Distributed Data Curation Center, Purdue University

DataONE Education Module 08: Data Citation

DataONE

Todd Carpenter Presentation at Project Muse Publishers Meeting - April 24, 2014

National Information Standards Organization (NISO)

Has anyone seen my data? Incentivising #opendata sharing with altmetrics

Nick Sheppard

As an important component of the scholarly record, research data, software and code are increasingly managed as research outputs in their own right, though are not typically subject to peer review. In line with the broader ‘open research’ movement there is a growing impetus for datasets, software and code to be curated in repositories, openly available wherever possible subject to relevant legal and ethical constraints. Data repositories such as Figshare, Dryad and Zenodo routinely allocate DOIs for deposited data while many universities in the UK also allocate and mint DOIs in their nascent institutionally based data repositories through Datacite which means they will be automatically tracked by altmetric.com in the same way as journal articles. While the repository infrastructure continues to develop and there are pockets of best practice, data sharing and reuse is not yet fully established across UK HE. Reward mechanisms are immature and data citation, for example, is limited and not easy to track. Clarivate Analytics’ Data Citation Index coverage of UK based repositories is still relatively low and, as a subscription based product, is not widely accessible. COUNTER compliant downloads can be derived from IRUSdata-UK (beta) which currently tracks 27 UK based institutional data repositories. Altmetrics therefore offers a low barrier method to track engagement with datasets and, in lieu of a more formal process, might be regarded as a type of informal peer review. We have undertaken a preliminary analysis of repositories that participate in IRUSdata-UK (beta) using it as a source of DOIs to run against the altmetric.com API to discover to what extent research data, software and code is being shared. This talk will present these preliminary results and explore how and why datasets are being shared across the various platforms tracked by altmetric.com and potential barriers. It will consider how data repository managers can encourage and facilitate data sharing through social media networks, blogs and “data journalism” and will draw on the Research Data Management (RDM) Engagement Award at the University of Leeds which is exploring linking RDM with the Open Science movement via the Wikimedia suite of tools. What does the altmetric data currently tell us about how research data is being linked to this global platform

UKSG 2018 Breakout - Setting your cites to open I4OC - Maccallum

UKSG: connecting the knowledge community

Sitations are the way that researchers communicate how their work builds on and relates to the work of others and they can be used to trace how a discovery spreads and is used by researchers in different disciplines and countries. Creating a truly comprehensive map of scholarship, however, relies on having a curated machine-readable database of citation information, where the provenance of every citation is clear and reusable. The Initiative for Open Citations (I4OC), a campaign launched on 6 April 2017, sought to make publisher members of Crossref aware that they could open up the citation metadata they already give to Crossref simply by asking them. With the support of major publishers and the endorsement of funders and other organisations, more than 50% of citation data in Crossref is now freely available, up from less than 1% before the campaign. This provides the foundation of a well-structured, open database of literally millions of datapoints that anyone can query, mine, consume and explore. The presenter will discuss the aims of the campaign, the new innovative services that are already using the data, what more still needs to be done and how you can support the initiative. Catriona J MacCallum, Hindawi

ODIN: Connecting research and researchers

Sergio Ruiz

The document discusses the ODIN project which aims to explore opportunities for linking ORCID and DataCite identifiers to support open science. It notes that ORCID and DataCite are emerging as participative initiatives that could play a significant role in underpinning a sustainable persistent identifier e-infrastructure. The project conducted a gap analysis and developed a roadmap. It carried out proofs-of-concept in the humanities/social sciences and high energy physics domains. The second year of ODIN focused on promoting adoption of ORCID and DataCite, encouraging interoperability with other systems, establishing workflows for specific domains, and exploring common approaches across domains.

RoRILaunch 6 PARTNERSHIPS Herzog

RoRInstitute

Optimising Scientific Knowledge Transfer: How Collective Sensemaking Can Ena...

Anita de Waard

The Future of Research Communications and e-Scholarship: Are we there yet?

National Information Standards Organization (NISO)

The Future of Open Science

Philip Bourne

Philip Bourne presented his viewpoint on the future of open science at an NIAID workshop. He argued that as science becomes more democratized, it will lead to more scrutiny of research, a need for new types of rewards beyond publications and citations, and a removal of artificial boundaries between fields. As an example, he discussed how open science allowed two researchers working in different areas to connect via common data references in their notebooks. Bourne believes this digitization and interconnection of research will accelerate, transforming institutions into digital enterprises where digital assets are identifiable and interoperable. However, fully realizing this vision will require coordinating tools across the research lifecycle through common frameworks and developing new support structures.

Big Data (SOCIOMETRIC METHODS FOR RELEVANCY ANALYSIS OF LONG TAIL SCIENCE D...

AKSHAY BHAGAT

This document discusses the DataBridge project, which aims to enable easier discoverability and use of long tail science data. DataBridge will create a multidimensional network and social network for scientific data by mapping datasets connected by relationships between their metadata, usage, and the methods used to analyze them. This will allow researchers to more easily find relevant datasets by automatically forming communities of similar data. The document outlines DataBridge's vision and progress to date, including the algorithms it is investigating for measuring similarity between datasets in order to facilitate searching for collaborators and discoveries.

An Infrastructure for Sustainable Innovation and Research in Computer Scienc...

Peter Brusilovsky

IDCC workshop: OpenAIRE services and tools for Open Research Data in H2020

OpenAIRE

- Check compliance - Provide feedback - Suggest improvements Data Repositories CRIS Systems OA Journals Aggregators 100 OpenAIRE Guidelines 101 - Metadata standards (DC, CERIF, DataCite) - Interoperability best practices - OpenAIRE profile customizations - APIs and protocols (OAI-PMH, SWORDv2) OpenAIRE Validator - Web service - Standalone tool - Automatic validation - Feedback reports OpenAIRE Assistant - Interactive guidance - Step-by-step improvements - Customized recommendations Benefits for content

6 oct15 writing kmb plan edited

Shawna Reibling

This document provides guidance on developing a knowledge mobilization plan. It defines knowledge mobilization and different related terms used across funding agencies. An effective plan must identify the research outcomes, target audiences and how they will be reached. It should also explain how impact will be evaluated over time. The plan requires determining appropriate knowledge products and resources like budgets, timelines, and ensuring open access of research outputs. Support services are available to help with workshops on clear writing, digital identity, and engaging events on social media. Developing a strong knowledge mobilization plan is important for sharing research broadly and creating real-world impact.

NISO Virtual Conference Scientific Data Management: Caring for Your Instituti...

National Information Standards Organization (NISO)

Moving from an IR to a CRIS, the why & how

David T Palmer

IRs collect, manage and display publications, and their metadata. However, an institution’s research, expertise and capacity is described by more than publications. The HKU Scholars Hub, hosted in DSpace, began as the IR of The University of Hong Kong (HKU) in 2005. Asking for voluntary deposit of publications from HKU academics, it received little notice, and more importantly, little support from University senior management. In 2009 a new HKU initiative, Knowledge Exchange, adopted the Hub as a key vehicle to share knowledge and skill with the community outside HKU. With funding support from the Office of KE, we extended the data model of DSpace to include relational tables on non-publication objects, including people, grants, and patents, holding attributes of these objects, such as co-investigators, co-inventors, co-prize winners, research interests, languages spoken, supervision of postgraduate theses, etc. The DSpace user interface now delivers an integrated search and display on these objects and attributes, as well as on ones newly derived, such as authority work on name disambiguation and synonymy in Roman and Hanzi (漢字), visualizations on networks of co-authors, co-investigators, etc, metrics extracted from external sources such as Scopus, WoS, PubMed, Google Scholar Citations, internal alt-metrics of view and download counts, and more. Beyond the functions of an IR, the Hub now performs as a system for reputation management, impact management, and research networking and profiling -- all of which are concepts included in the broad term, “Current Research Information System” (CRIS). These new objects and attributes curated from several trusted sources, and integrated into the present mashup, contextualize and highlight HKU research, and attract more hits, than an IR with only publications. The HKU Office of Knowledge Exchange has now funded the modularization of these new HKU features of DSpace. Together with our partner, CINECA of Italy, we are making this work available in open source for the DSpace community.

Similar to ODIN Final Event - Supporting the research lifecycle: Discovery and Analysis (20)

Digging into assessment data: Tips, tricks, and tools of the trade.

Identifiers for Researchers and Data: Increasing Attribution and Discovery– J...

Trends in-connecting-research-sgd-2013

Orcid Rails Hydra Plug-in outreach meeting May_21_2014

Hydra ORCID Plug-in

DataONE Education Module 08: Data Citation

Todd Carpenter Presentation at Project Muse Publishers Meeting - April 24, 2014

Has anyone seen my data? Incentivising #opendata sharing with altmetrics

UKSG 2018 Breakout - Setting your cites to open I4OC - Maccallum

ODIN: Connecting research and researchers

RoRILaunch 6 PARTNERSHIPS Herzog

Optimising Scientific Knowledge Transfer: How Collective Sensemaking Can Ena...

The Future of Research Communications and e-Scholarship: Are we there yet?

The Future of Open Science

Big Data (SOCIOMETRIC METHODS FOR RELEVANCY ANALYSIS OF LONG TAIL SCIENCE D...

An Infrastructure for Sustainable Innovation and Research in Computer Scienc...

IDCC workshop: OpenAIRE services and tools for Open Research Data in H2020

6 oct15 writing kmb plan edited

NISO Virtual Conference Scientific Data Management: Caring for Your Instituti...

Moving from an IR to a CRIS, the why & how

More from datacite

Creating Incentives

datacite

DataCite overview 2014

datacite

2013 DataCite Summer Meeting - Thomson Reuters Data citation index cooperatio...

datacite

2013 DataCite Summer Meeting - Data-Planet (Matt Dunie - Data-Planet)

datacite

2013 DataCite Summer Meeting - Figshare (Mark Hahnel - Figshare)

datacite

2013 DataCite Summer Meeting - Closing Keynote: Building Community Engagement...

datacite

2013 DataCite Summer Meeting - Elsevier's program to support research data (H...

datacite

2013 DataCite Summer Meeting - FundRef cooperation with CrossRef (Chuck Koshe...

datacite

2013 DataCite Summer Meeting - Introducing DataCite working groups: Metadata ...

datacite

2013 DataCite Summer Meeting - Introducing DataCite services (Jan Brase - Dat...

datacite

2013 DataCite Summer Meeting - Out of Cite, Out of Mind: Report of the CODATA...

datacite

2013 DataCite Summer Meeting - Update on Force 11 and the Amsterdam manifesto...

datacite

This document summarizes the process undertaken by the Data Citation Synthesis Group to develop a consensus set of principles for data citation. The group was formed in response to multiple organizations developing similar sets of principles. It brought together 36 members from around 20 organizations to review 4 existing sets of data citation principles over 3 months of weekly meetings. They merged the principles into a single synthesis set of 8 high-level, simple principles for data citation. The principles address the importance of data citation, credit and attribution for data contributors, use of data citations as evidence, use of persistent and unique identifiers, access to data and metadata, ensuring identifier and metadata persistence beyond the data lifespan, accommodating versioning and granularity of data, and ensuring inter

2013 DataCite Summer Meeting - Purdue University Research Repository (PURR) (...

datacite

Michael Witt presented on the Purdue University Research Repository (PURR) at the DataCite summer meeting. PURR is a collaborative effort between Purdue University Libraries, Office of the Vice President for Research, and Information Technology. It provides researchers a space to store, share, and publish research data, with librarian support for data management plans and curation. PURR aims to encourage citation of datasets by assigning identifiers, displaying licenses, providing citation examples, and exposing structured citations. It is built on open source HUBzero software and has over 1,000 registered researchers sharing data across 200 projects.

2013 DataCite Summer Meeting - DOIs and Supercomputing (Terry Jones - Oak Rid...

datacite

2013 DataCite Summer Meeting - California Digital Library (Joan Starr - Calif...

datacite

2013 DataCite Summer Meeting - Opening Keynote: A short history of the Higgs ...

datacite

2013 DataCite Summer Meeting - Introduction (Adam Farquhar - DataCite)

datacite

What is DataCite-screenshots

datacite

DataCite is a global consortium that provides persistent identifiers (DOIs) for scientific data to make it easily discoverable and citable. It aims to put datasets on the same level as research articles. DataCite has over 1.7 million DOIs registered and many member organizations worldwide. It develops standards and infrastructure like its metadata schema and search portal to help data archives and researchers globally.

What is DataCite?

datacite

DataCite is a global consortium that provides standards and services to make research data findable, accessible, and citable. It assigns digital object identifiers (DOIs) to datasets and other research works to improve how they are located and referenced. DataCite was founded in 2009 and is supported by many research institutions and libraries around the world. It develops best practices for data publishing and sharing and operates metadata and search services to help researchers discover and access data.

Riding the wave - Paradigm shifts in information access

datacite

The document discusses the paradigm shifts in scientific information access over time from empirical observation to computational simulation. It outlines the challenges libraries now face in providing access to non-textual scientific content like research data and simulations. The document also introduces DataCite, a global consortium that issues digital object identifiers (DOIs) to datasets to help make them accessible, citable, and traceable like scholarly articles.

More from datacite (20)