Presentation by Todd Carpenter during the Project Muse Publishers meeting in Baltimore, MD on April 24, 2014. During this talk, Todd discussed standards related to scholarly publishing and the output of several NISO initiatives.
Todd Carpenter's presentation at the 3:AM conference in Bucharest, Romania on September 29, 2016 describing the NISO Alternative Assessment Project final output and next steps.
"Standards for Metadata: Who is developing What, where and why" Presented by Todd Carpenter at American Association of University Presses (AAUP) Annual Conference in New Orleans, LA on June 22, 2014
DataQ project update from the 2015 GWLA/GPN Annual Meeting on May 29th, 2015, Kansas City, MO.
DataQ is a collaborative platform and community aimed at addressing research data questions in academic libraries. This project was made possible in part by the Institute of Museum and Library Services Sparks! Ignition Grant for Libraries SP-02-14-0020-14.
Todd Carpenter's presentation on the standards related to publishing platforms, content creation, and distribution. The presentation touches on file production, metadata, authentication, assessment and privacy issues.
You Can’t Browse The Stacks In A Digital Library: Indexed Discovery, Fair Linking & NISO’s Open Discovery Initiative. A presentation by Todd Carpenter at the 2014 Charleston Library Conference #CHS14 on November 6, 2014.
Todd Carpenter's presentation at the 3:AM conference in Bucharest, Romania on September 29, 2016 describing the NISO Alternative Assessment Project final output and next steps.
"Standards for Metadata: Who is developing What, where and why" Presented by Todd Carpenter at American Association of University Presses (AAUP) Annual Conference in New Orleans, LA on June 22, 2014
DataQ project update from the 2015 GWLA/GPN Annual Meeting on May 29th, 2015, Kansas City, MO.
DataQ is a collaborative platform and community aimed at addressing research data questions in academic libraries. This project was made possible in part by the Institute of Museum and Library Services Sparks! Ignition Grant for Libraries SP-02-14-0020-14.
Todd Carpenter's presentation on the standards related to publishing platforms, content creation, and distribution. The presentation touches on file production, metadata, authentication, assessment and privacy issues.
You Can’t Browse The Stacks In A Digital Library: Indexed Discovery, Fair Linking & NISO’s Open Discovery Initiative. A presentation by Todd Carpenter at the 2014 Charleston Library Conference #CHS14 on November 6, 2014.
June 17, 2015
NISO Virtual Conference: The Eternal To-Do List: Making Ebooks work in Libraries
Technology Evaluation and Meeting the Needs of People with Disabilities
Sue Cullen, M.S., Assistant Director, Accessible Technology Initiative, CSU Office of the Chancellor
Dawn Futrell, MA, Accessible Technology Specialist, CSU Accessible Technology Network (CSU ATN), Accessible Technology Initiative (ATI), California State University Chancellor’s Office
NISO's Altmetrics Initiative, a presentation by Nettie Lagace for ICIS: Innovating Communication in Scholarship meeting at UC Davis February 13-14, 2014
Presentation on how DOAJ is striving to increase the transparency and credibility of open access publishing throughout research communities.
Presentation at the 4ª Conferencia internacional sobre calidad de revistas de ciencias sociales y humanidades (CRECS 2014) Madrid, 8-9 de mayo de 2014
Acceptance speech for Directory of Open Access Journals winning the Ugena prize, awarded by the Sociedad Latina de Comunicación Social.
This talk focused on the status of the NISO Link Origin Tracking Initiative, given at the NISO Standards Update at ALA Annual Conference 2016. The presenter was Nettie Lagace of NISO
This presentation was given during the NISO Update session at ALA in Orlando Florida on June 26, 2016. The speaker was Elise Sassone of Springer-Nature.
This presentation was given during the ALA 2016 NISO Standards Update on June 26, 2016. The presenter is Marlene Van Ballegoie of the University of Toronto
Speakers: Laurie Kaplan, ProQuest; Nettie Lagace, NISO. This program provides an update on several NISO projects potentially of interest to serials librarians, including PIE-J (Presentation and Identification of E-Journals), ODI (Open Discovery Initiative), KBART (KnowledgeBases and Related Tools), and OAMI (Open Access Metadata and Indicators). The projects are at different stages in their creation, publication and revision lifecycles, but all require community understanding and input. Participants will receive practical information on how the initiatives affect their daily work and how their experiences can shape the creation and uptake of consensus-based community standards in the library and information industry.
About the Webinar
The development and rising popularity of the massive open online course (MOOC) presents a new opportunity for libraries to be involved in the education of patrons, to highlight the resources libraries provide and to further demonstrate the value of the library to administrators. There are, of course, a host of logistics to be considered when deciding to organize or support a MOOC. Diminished library budgets and staffing levels challenge libraries both monetarily and administratively. Marketing the course, mounting it on a site, securing copyright permissions and negotiating licensing for course materials, managing the course while in progress and troubleshooting technical problems add to the issues that have caused some libraries to hesitate in joining the MOOC movement. On the other hand, partnerships such as that between Georgetown University and edX, itself an initiative of Harvard and MIT, allow a pooling of resources thereby easing the burden on any one library. In some cases price breaks for certain course materials used in MOOCs can help draw students to the course, though the pricing must still be negotiated by the course organizer. A successful MOOC, such as the RootsMOOC, created by the Z. Smith Reynolds Library at Wake Forest University and the State Library of North Carolina, can bring awareness of library resources to a broad audience.
In the end, libraries must ask whether the advantages of participating in a MOOC outweigh the challenges. The speakers for this webinar will consider these issues surrounding MOOCs and libraries and try to answer the question of whether the impact of libraries on MOOCs has been realized or is still brewing.
Agenda
Introduction
Todd Carpenter, Executive Director, NISO
MOOCS: Assessing the Landscape and Trends of Open Online Learning
Heather Ruland Staines, Director Publisher and Content Strategy, ProQuest SIPX
The RootsMOOC Project or: that time we threw a genealogy party and 4,000 people showed up
Kyle Denlinger, eLearning Librarian, Wake Forest University Z. Smith Reynolds Library
Rebecca Hyman, Reference and Outreach Librarian, Government and Heritage Library, State Library of North Carolina
MOOCS and Me: Georgetown's Experience with MOOC Production
Barrinton Baynes, Multimedia Projects Manager, Gelardin New Media Center, Georgetown University Library
What does success look like when it comes to library discoverability? Index based discovery systems have seen a dramatic rate of adoption since introduction to the research ecosystem in 2009, with more than 9,000 libraries relying on a discovery system to provide users with a comprehensive index to their offerings. Some issues bar the way to providing this comprehensive view, but many challenges have been overcome through collaboration between libraries, content providers and discovery partners. The NISO ODI initiative began to examine these issues in 2011, and released a best practice in June 2014.
Speakers will highlight examples of successful collaboration, note continued areas of challenge, and provide insight on how the Open Discovery Initiative Conformance Checklists can be used as a mechanism to evaluate content provider or discovery provider conformance with the best practice.
Wiley’s 2013 open access survey was deployed in May 2013 to 107,000 corresponding authors of Wiley journal articles. Key findings include:
• The number of open access authors has grown significantly.
• Quality and profile of open access publications remains a concern.
• There are indications of author confusion around funder mandates.
• Respondents overwhelmingly preferred the more permissive licenses.
• Considerable differences emerge between early career professionals and more established colleagues when comparing funding and payments for APCs.
For more information, please visit http://exchanges.wiley.com/blog
Connect with us:
http://twitter.com/WileyExchanges
http://twitter.com/WileyOpenAccess
June 17, 2015
NISO Virtual Conference: The Eternal To-Do List: Making Ebooks work in Libraries
Technology Evaluation and Meeting the Needs of People with Disabilities
Sue Cullen, M.S., Assistant Director, Accessible Technology Initiative, CSU Office of the Chancellor
Dawn Futrell, MA, Accessible Technology Specialist, CSU Accessible Technology Network (CSU ATN), Accessible Technology Initiative (ATI), California State University Chancellor’s Office
NISO's Altmetrics Initiative, a presentation by Nettie Lagace for ICIS: Innovating Communication in Scholarship meeting at UC Davis February 13-14, 2014
Presentation on how DOAJ is striving to increase the transparency and credibility of open access publishing throughout research communities.
Presentation at the 4ª Conferencia internacional sobre calidad de revistas de ciencias sociales y humanidades (CRECS 2014) Madrid, 8-9 de mayo de 2014
Acceptance speech for Directory of Open Access Journals winning the Ugena prize, awarded by the Sociedad Latina de Comunicación Social.
This talk focused on the status of the NISO Link Origin Tracking Initiative, given at the NISO Standards Update at ALA Annual Conference 2016. The presenter was Nettie Lagace of NISO
This presentation was given during the NISO Update session at ALA in Orlando Florida on June 26, 2016. The speaker was Elise Sassone of Springer-Nature.
This presentation was given during the ALA 2016 NISO Standards Update on June 26, 2016. The presenter is Marlene Van Ballegoie of the University of Toronto
Speakers: Laurie Kaplan, ProQuest; Nettie Lagace, NISO. This program provides an update on several NISO projects potentially of interest to serials librarians, including PIE-J (Presentation and Identification of E-Journals), ODI (Open Discovery Initiative), KBART (KnowledgeBases and Related Tools), and OAMI (Open Access Metadata and Indicators). The projects are at different stages in their creation, publication and revision lifecycles, but all require community understanding and input. Participants will receive practical information on how the initiatives affect their daily work and how their experiences can shape the creation and uptake of consensus-based community standards in the library and information industry.
About the Webinar
The development and rising popularity of the massive open online course (MOOC) presents a new opportunity for libraries to be involved in the education of patrons, to highlight the resources libraries provide and to further demonstrate the value of the library to administrators. There are, of course, a host of logistics to be considered when deciding to organize or support a MOOC. Diminished library budgets and staffing levels challenge libraries both monetarily and administratively. Marketing the course, mounting it on a site, securing copyright permissions and negotiating licensing for course materials, managing the course while in progress and troubleshooting technical problems add to the issues that have caused some libraries to hesitate in joining the MOOC movement. On the other hand, partnerships such as that between Georgetown University and edX, itself an initiative of Harvard and MIT, allow a pooling of resources thereby easing the burden on any one library. In some cases price breaks for certain course materials used in MOOCs can help draw students to the course, though the pricing must still be negotiated by the course organizer. A successful MOOC, such as the RootsMOOC, created by the Z. Smith Reynolds Library at Wake Forest University and the State Library of North Carolina, can bring awareness of library resources to a broad audience.
In the end, libraries must ask whether the advantages of participating in a MOOC outweigh the challenges. The speakers for this webinar will consider these issues surrounding MOOCs and libraries and try to answer the question of whether the impact of libraries on MOOCs has been realized or is still brewing.
Agenda
Introduction
Todd Carpenter, Executive Director, NISO
MOOCS: Assessing the Landscape and Trends of Open Online Learning
Heather Ruland Staines, Director Publisher and Content Strategy, ProQuest SIPX
The RootsMOOC Project or: that time we threw a genealogy party and 4,000 people showed up
Kyle Denlinger, eLearning Librarian, Wake Forest University Z. Smith Reynolds Library
Rebecca Hyman, Reference and Outreach Librarian, Government and Heritage Library, State Library of North Carolina
MOOCS and Me: Georgetown's Experience with MOOC Production
Barrinton Baynes, Multimedia Projects Manager, Gelardin New Media Center, Georgetown University Library
What does success look like when it comes to library discoverability? Index based discovery systems have seen a dramatic rate of adoption since introduction to the research ecosystem in 2009, with more than 9,000 libraries relying on a discovery system to provide users with a comprehensive index to their offerings. Some issues bar the way to providing this comprehensive view, but many challenges have been overcome through collaboration between libraries, content providers and discovery partners. The NISO ODI initiative began to examine these issues in 2011, and released a best practice in June 2014.
Speakers will highlight examples of successful collaboration, note continued areas of challenge, and provide insight on how the Open Discovery Initiative Conformance Checklists can be used as a mechanism to evaluate content provider or discovery provider conformance with the best practice.
Wiley’s 2013 open access survey was deployed in May 2013 to 107,000 corresponding authors of Wiley journal articles. Key findings include:
• The number of open access authors has grown significantly.
• Quality and profile of open access publications remains a concern.
• There are indications of author confusion around funder mandates.
• Respondents overwhelmingly preferred the more permissive licenses.
• Considerable differences emerge between early career professionals and more established colleagues when comparing funding and payments for APCs.
For more information, please visit http://exchanges.wiley.com/blog
Connect with us:
http://twitter.com/WileyExchanges
http://twitter.com/WileyOpenAccess
Publishing Scientific Research & How to Write High-Impact Research Papersjjuhlrich
Presentation given by John Uhlrich, editor of the journal Energy Technology at Wiley-VCH, on a visit to Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, 5th of October 2016.
Wiley-VCH Mathero Summer School Presentation-John Uhlrichjjuhlrich
Tips on the publication process and how to write successful scientific papers, given for PhD students in the physical sciences at the Mathero Summer School.
Freudenberg, Germany
26 August 2015
The Open Discovery Initiative (ODI) is a National Information Standards Organization (NISO) Working Group formed to develop a recommended practice in the area of index-based library discovery services. These single search services, ever-more relied upon as a primary basis for accessing a library’s collections, have improved the research experience immensely, but they remain firmly seated in a heterogeneous ecosystem consisting of diverse players with individual interests. With the intent of streamlining communications and processes in order to better serve library end users, ODI is investigating the stakeholder landscape in the following areas: data format and data transfer; communication of libraries’ rights to specific content; level of indexing performed for content; definition of fair linking to published content; exchange of usage data between discovery providers and information providers. This session will report on the progress of the group’s research work, including interviews and surveys of stakeholders, and preview the Draft ODI Recommended Practice, expected to be released for public comment soon after the Coalition for Networked Information spring 2013 membership meeting.
Nettie Lagace, presentation at Electronic Resources & Libraries, Open Discovery Initiative, April 5, 2016
http://erl2016.sched.org/event/5ZQ6/s36-01-open-discovery-initiative-priorities-and-directions
Nettie Lagace presentation Open Discovery Initiative April 5, 2016
http://erl2016.sched.org/event/5ZQ6/s36-01-open-discovery-initiative-priorities-and-directions
Todd Carpenter's presentation to the Amigos Library Services "Discovery Tools Now and in the Future" Virtual conference on the NISO Open Discovery Initiative. November 18, 2014
2.24.16 Slides, “VIVO plus SHARE: Closing the Loop on Tracking Scholarly Acti...DuraSpace
Hot Topics: The DuraSpace Community Webinar Series
Series 13: “VIVO plus SHARE: Closing the Loop on Scholarly Activity”
Webinar 1: , “VIVO plus SHARE: Closing the Loop on Tracking Scholarly Activity” 2.24.16
Curated by Rick Johnson, Program Co-Director, Digital Initiatives and Scholarship Head, Data Curation and Digital Library Solutions Hesburgh Libraries, University of Notre Dame; Visiting Program Officer for SHARE at the Association of Research Libraries. Presented by Rick Johnson & Mike Conlon, VIVO Project Director, DuraSpace
LIBER, Ligue Européenne des Bibliothèques de Recherche, launched its new strategy 2018-2022 in November 2017. This presentation gives an overview about LIBER's vision, strategic directions, steering committee and working groups - existing and to be created in the years to come.
ORCID identifiers in repositories
The ORCID identifier has been incorporated into numerous repository platforms. This session will offer a discussion of integration points, policy issues, data flow between systems, researcher participation, discovered opportunities, and demonstrations by universities, research organizations, and vendors.
Moderator: Salvatore Mele, Head of Open Access at CERN
Presenters:
Robin Haw, Scientific Associate and Reactome Outreach Coordinator, Department of Informatics and Bio-computing, OICR
Rick Johnson, Co-Program Director, Digital Library Initiatives and Scholarship E-Research and Digital Initiatives, Notre Dame University
Ann Campion Riley, Associate Director for Access, Collections and Technical Services, University of Missouri Library
Sarah Shreeves, Coordinator, Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (IDEALS), University Library. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Michael Witt, Head, Distributed Data Curation Center, Purdue University
LIBER Strategy for libraries and research dataJeannette Frey
A presentation about the new LIBER (Ligue Européenne des bibliothèques de recherche) Strategy 2018-2022, with a special focus on the question of research data.
This presentation was provided by Marshall Breeding, Independent Consultant and Founder of Library Technology Guides; Co-Chair, ODI Working Group, at the
2012 NISO Standards Update at ALA.
The NISO Update provides the latest news about NISO's current efforts, including standards, recommended practices and community meetings covering many areas of interest to the library community. Working group members will provide updates on projects newly underway or recently completed.
Open Discovery Initiative (ODI), Laura Morse, Director, Library Systems, Harvard University
The World Wants Interoperability: NISO and Community-Driven Standards
The National Information Standards Organization (NISO) provides a unique environment for libraries, publishers, system providers and other information industry stakeholders to meet together and represent perspectives and requirements to create and shape consensus-driven standards and recommended practices that drive our shared technology forward. Nettie Lagace, NISO's Associate Director for Programs, will provide an overview of NISO's approach to creating industry standards which support data exchange and system interoperability, including examples of recent and current NISO contributions to the scholarly communication universe such as its work in alternative assessment metrics, publication and transfer of data and other scholarly output, and user-focused discovery and delivery of digital content.
This presentation was provided by Steph Pollock of The American Psychological Association’s Journals Program, and Damita Snow, of The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), for the initial session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session One: 'Setting Expectations: a DEIA Primer,' was held June 6, 2024.
This presentation was provided by William Mattingly of the Smithsonian Institution, during the closing segment of the NISO training series "AI & Prompt Design." Session Eight: Limitations and Potential Solutions, was held on May 23, 2024.
This presentation was provided by William Mattingly of the Smithsonian Institution, during the seventh segment of the NISO training series "AI & Prompt Design." Session 7: Open Source Language Models, was held on May 16, 2024.
This presentation was provided by William Mattingly of the Smithsonian Institution, during the sixth segment of the NISO training series "AI & Prompt Design." Session Six: Text Classification with LLMs, was held on May 9, 2024.
This presentation was provided by William Mattingly of the Smithsonian Institution, during the fifth segment of the NISO training series "AI & Prompt Design." Session Five: Named Entity Recognition with LLMs, was held on May 2, 2024.
This presentation was provided by William Mattingly of the Smithsonian Institution, during the fourth segment of the NISO training series "AI & Prompt Design." Session Four: Structured Data and Assistants, was held on April 25, 2024.
This presentation was provided by William Mattingly of the Smithsonian Institution, during the third segment of the NISO training series "AI & Prompt Design." Session Three: Beginning Conversations, was held on April 18, 2024.
This presentation was provided by Kaveh Bazargan of River Valley Technologies, during the NISO webinar "Sustainability in Publishing." The event was held April 17, 2024.
This presentation was provided by Dana Compton of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), during the NISO webinar "Sustainability in Publishing." The event was held April 17, 2024.
This presentation was provided by William Mattingly of the Smithsonian Institution, during the second segment of the NISO training series "AI & Prompt Design." Session Two: Large Language Models, was held on April 11, 2024.
This presentation was provided by Teresa Hazen of the University of Arizona, Geoff Morse of Northwestern University. and Ken Varnum of the University of Michigan, during the Spring ODI Conformance Statement Workshop for Libraries. This event was held on April 9, 2024
This presentation was provided by William Mattingly of the Smithsonian Institution, during the opening segment of the NISO training series "AI & Prompt Design." Session One: Introduction to Machine Learning, was held on April 4, 2024.
This presentation was provided by William Mattingly of the Smithsonian Institution, for the eight and final session of NISO's 2023 Training Series on Text and Data Mining. Session eight, "Building Data Driven Applications" was held on Thursday, December 7, 2023.
This presentation was provided by William Mattingly of the Smithsonian Institution, for the seventh session of NISO's 2023 Training Series on Text and Data Mining. Session seven, "Vector Databases and Semantic Searching" was held on Thursday, November 30, 2023.
This presentation was provided by William Mattingly of the Smithsonian Institution, for the sixth session of NISO's 2023 Training Series on Text and Data Mining. Session six, "Text Mining Techniques" was held on Thursday, November 16, 2023.
This presentation was provided by William Mattingly of the Smithsonian Institution, for the fifth session of NISO's 2023 Training Series on Text and Data Mining. Session five, "Text Processing for Library Data" was held on Thursday, November 9, 2023.
This presentation was provided by Todd Carpenter, Executive Director, during the NISO webinar on "Strategic Planning." The event was held virtually on November 8, 2023.
This presentation was provided by Rhonda Ross of CAS, a division of the American Chemical Society, and Jonathan Clark of the International DOI Foundation, during the NISO webinar on "Strategic Planning." The event was held virtually on November 8, 2023.
This presentation was provided by William Mattingly of the Smithsonian Institution, for the fourth session of NISO's 2023 Training Series on Text and Data Mining. Session four, "Data Mining Techniques" was held on Thursday, November 2, 2023.
More from National Information Standards Organization (NISO) (20)
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...DanBrown980551
Do you want to learn how to model and simulate an electrical network from scratch in under an hour?
Then welcome to this PowSyBl workshop, hosted by Rte, the French Transmission System Operator (TSO)!
During the webinar, you will discover the PowSyBl ecosystem as well as handle and study an electrical network through an interactive Python notebook.
PowSyBl is an open source project hosted by LF Energy, which offers a comprehensive set of features for electrical grid modelling and simulation. Among other advanced features, PowSyBl provides:
- A fully editable and extendable library for grid component modelling;
- Visualization tools to display your network;
- Grid simulation tools, such as power flows, security analyses (with or without remedial actions) and sensitivity analyses;
The framework is mostly written in Java, with a Python binding so that Python developers can access PowSyBl functionalities as well.
What you will learn during the webinar:
- For beginners: discover PowSyBl's functionalities through a quick general presentation and the notebook, without needing any expert coding skills;
- For advanced developers: master the skills to efficiently apply PowSyBl functionalities to your real-world scenarios.
Essentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FMESafe Software
In this second installment of our Essentials of Automations webinar series, we’ll explore the landscape of triggers and actions, guiding you through the nuances of authoring and adapting workspaces for seamless automations. Gain an understanding of the full spectrum of triggers and actions available in FME, empowering you to enhance your workspaces for efficient automation.
We’ll kick things off by showcasing the most commonly used event-based triggers, introducing you to various automation workflows like manual triggers, schedules, directory watchers, and more. Plus, see how these elements play out in real scenarios.
Whether you’re tweaking your current setup or building from the ground up, this session will arm you with the tools and insights needed to transform your FME usage into a powerhouse of productivity. Join us to discover effective strategies that simplify complex processes, enhancing your productivity and transforming your data management practices with FME. Let’s turn complexity into clarity and make your workspaces work wonders!
DevOps and Testing slides at DASA ConnectKari Kakkonen
My and Rik Marselis slides at 30.5.2024 DASA Connect conference. We discuss about what is testing, then what is agile testing and finally what is Testing in DevOps. Finally we had lovely workshop with the participants trying to find out different ways to think about quality and testing in different parts of the DevOps infinity loop.
Elevating Tactical DDD Patterns Through Object CalisthenicsDorra BARTAGUIZ
After immersing yourself in the blue book and its red counterpart, attending DDD-focused conferences, and applying tactical patterns, you're left with a crucial question: How do I ensure my design is effective? Tactical patterns within Domain-Driven Design (DDD) serve as guiding principles for creating clear and manageable domain models. However, achieving success with these patterns requires additional guidance. Interestingly, we've observed that a set of constraints initially designed for training purposes remarkably aligns with effective pattern implementation, offering a more ‘mechanical’ approach. Let's explore together how Object Calisthenics can elevate the design of your tactical DDD patterns, offering concrete help for those venturing into DDD for the first time!
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 4. In this session, we will cover Test Manager overview along with SAP heatmap.
The UiPath Test Manager overview with SAP heatmap webinar offers a concise yet comprehensive exploration of the role of a Test Manager within SAP environments, coupled with the utilization of heatmaps for effective testing strategies.
Participants will gain insights into the responsibilities, challenges, and best practices associated with test management in SAP projects. Additionally, the webinar delves into the significance of heatmaps as a visual aid for identifying testing priorities, areas of risk, and resource allocation within SAP landscapes. Through this session, attendees can expect to enhance their understanding of test management principles while learning practical approaches to optimize testing processes in SAP environments using heatmap visualization techniques
What will you get from this session?
1. Insights into SAP testing best practices
2. Heatmap utilization for testing
3. Optimization of testing processes
4. Demo
Topics covered:
Execution from the test manager
Orchestrator execution result
Defect reporting
SAP heatmap example with demo
Speaker:
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
Sudheer Mechineni, Head of Application Frameworks, Standard Chartered Bank
Discover how Standard Chartered Bank harnessed the power of Neo4j to transform complex data access challenges into a dynamic, scalable graph database solution. This keynote will cover their journey from initial adoption to deploying a fully automated, enterprise-grade causal cluster, highlighting key strategies for modelling organisational changes and ensuring robust disaster recovery. Learn how these innovations have not only enhanced Standard Chartered Bank’s data infrastructure but also positioned them as pioneers in the banking sector’s adoption of graph technology.
Generative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to ProductionAggregage
Join Maher Hanafi, VP of Engineering at Betterworks, in this new session where he'll share a practical framework to transform Gen AI prototypes into impactful products! He'll delve into the complexities of data collection and management, model selection and optimization, and ensuring security, scalability, and responsible use.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 5DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 5. In this session, we will cover CI/CD with devops.
Topics covered:
CI/CD with in UiPath
End-to-end overview of CI/CD pipeline with Azure devops
Speaker:
Lyndsey Byblow, Test Suite Sales Engineer @ UiPath, Inc.
Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024Albert Hoitingh
In this session I delve into the encryption technology used in Microsoft 365 and Microsoft Purview. Including the concepts of Customer Key and Double Key Encryption.
Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...SOFTTECHHUB
The choice of an operating system plays a pivotal role in shaping our computing experience. For decades, Microsoft's Windows has dominated the market, offering a familiar and widely adopted platform for personal and professional use. However, as technological advancements continue to push the boundaries of innovation, alternative operating systems have emerged, challenging the status quo and offering users a fresh perspective on computing.
One such alternative that has garnered significant attention and acclaim is Nitrux Linux 3.5.0, a sleek, powerful, and user-friendly Linux distribution that promises to redefine the way we interact with our devices. With its focus on performance, security, and customization, Nitrux Linux presents a compelling case for those seeking to break free from the constraints of proprietary software and embrace the freedom and flexibility of open-source computing.
Observability Concepts EVERY Developer Should Know -- DeveloperWeek Europe.pdfPaige Cruz
Monitoring and observability aren’t traditionally found in software curriculums and many of us cobble this knowledge together from whatever vendor or ecosystem we were first introduced to and whatever is a part of your current company’s observability stack.
While the dev and ops silo continues to crumble….many organizations still relegate monitoring & observability as the purview of ops, infra and SRE teams. This is a mistake - achieving a highly observable system requires collaboration up and down the stack.
I, a former op, would like to extend an invitation to all application developers to join the observability party will share these foundational concepts to build on:
Climate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing DaysKari Kakkonen
My slides at Nordic Testing Days 6.6.2024
Climate impact / sustainability of software testing discussed on the talk. ICT and testing must carry their part of global responsibility to help with the climat warming. We can minimize the carbon footprint but we can also have a carbon handprint, a positive impact on the climate. Quality characteristics can be added with sustainability, and then measured continuously. Test environments can be used less, and in smaller scale and on demand. Test techniques can be used in optimizing or minimizing number of tests. Test automation can be used to speed up testing.
In his public lecture, Christian Timmerer provides insights into the fascinating history of video streaming, starting from its humble beginnings before YouTube to the groundbreaking technologies that now dominate platforms like Netflix and ORF ON. Timmerer also presents provocative contributions of his own that have significantly influenced the industry. He concludes by looking at future challenges and invites the audience to join in a discussion.
Todd Carpenter Presentation at Project Muse Publishers Meeting - April 24, 2014
1. Around
the
publishing
technology
world
in
45
minutes
A
bit
on
NISO
&
standards
for
digital
content
Authorship
&
Iden>fica>on
Demand
Driven
Acquisi>on
Open
Discovery
Annota>on
Altmetrics
April 24, 2014 1
25
3. ! Non-‐profit
industry
trade
associaon
accredited
by
ANSI
! Mission
of
developing
and
maintaining
technical
standards
related
to
informaon,
documentaon,
discovery
and
distribuon
of
published
materials
and
media
! Volunteer
driven
organizaon:
400+
contributors
spread
out
across
the
world
! Responsible
(directly
and
indirectly)
for
standards
like
ISSN,
DOI,
Dublin
Core
metadata,
DAISY
digital
talking
books,
OpenURL,
MARC
records,
and
ISBN
About
April 24, 2014 3
4. April 24, 2014
38% Publishers/Publishing
Organizations
27% Libraries/Library
Organizations
123 LSA Members
(non-voting)
35% Library Systems Suppliers,
Publishing Vendors Intermediaries
ISO
ANSI
Other SDOs
National Information Standards Organization (NISO)
4
5. 5
Standards
are
familiar,
even
if
you
don’t
no4ce
Image: DanTaylor Image: Joel Washing
April 24, 2014
6. Communicang
science
has
changed
Image: Walters Art Museum
Image: Domenico, Caron, Davis, et al.
13. • ISO
27729:
Informaon
Documentaon
-‐-‐
Internaonal
Standard
Name
Idenfier
(ISNI)
• Launched
in
Spring
2012
• Idenfier
for
public
identy
of
pares
in
cultural
creaon
across
all
media
• Main
contributor
is
the
Virtual
Internaonal
Authority
File
(VIA)
–
Created
by
16
naonal
libraries
April 24, 2014 13
14. April 24, 2014 14
Nearly
7.5
Million
ISNIs
are
assigned
Another
6
million
“unverified”
names
800,000
researchers/scholars
490,000
instuons
Authorita4ve
iden4ty
(ISNI)
Versus
Individually
asserted
ID
(ORCID)
15. Potenal
reference
of
the
future?
ORCID/ISNI,
ISSN,
Vol/Issue
[DOI
metadata],
Instuon
ID,
Geo-‐locaon
[based
on
ISNI],
Date
[DOI
metadata],
DOI
April 24, 2014 15
17. The
context
for
ODI
• Emergence
of
Library
Discovery
Services
soluons
– Based
on
index
of
a
wide
range
of
content
– Commercial
and
open
access
– Primary
journal
literature,
ebooks,
and
more
• Adopted
by
thousands
of
libraries
around
the
world,
and
impact
millions
of
users
17April 24, 2014
18. General
Goals
• Define
ways
for
libraries
to
assess
the
level
of
content
providers’
parcipaon
in
discovery
services
• Help
streamline
the
process
by
which
content
providers
work
with
discovery
service
vendors
• Define
models
for
“fair”
linking
from
discovery
services
to
publishers’
content
• Determine
what
usage
stascs
should
be
collected
for
libraries
and
for
content
providers
18April 24, 2014
19. Balance
of
Constuents
Libraries
Publishers
Service
Providers
19
Marshall Breeding, Independent Consultant
Jamene Brooks-Kieffer, Kansas State University
Laura Morse, Harvard University
Ken Varnum, University of Michigan
Sara Brownmiller, University of Oregon
Lucy Harrison, Florida Virtual Campus (D2D
liaison/observer)
Michele Newberry, Independent
Lettie Conrad, SAGE Publications
Jeff Lang, Thomson Reuters
Linda Beebe, American Psychological Assoc
Aaron Wood, Alexander Street Press
Roger Schonfeld, JSTOR, Ithaka
Jenny Walker, Independent Consultant
John Law, Proquest
Michael Gorrell, EBSCO Information Services
David Lindahl, University of Rochester (XC)
Jeff Penka, OCLC (D2D liaison/observer)
April 24, 2014
20. Subgroups
• Technical
recommendaons
for
data
format
and
data
transfer
• Communicaon
of
library’s
rights/descriptors
regarding
level
of
indexing
• Definion
of
fair
linking
• Exchange
of
usage
data
20April 24, 2014
21. Deliverables
• Vocabulary
• NISO
Recommended
Pracce
– Data
format
and
data
transfer
– Library
rights
to
specific
content
– Level
of
indexing
– Fair
linking
– Usage
stascs
• Mechanisms
to
evaluate
conformance
with
recommended
pracce
21April 24, 2014
22. Current
steps
• 30-‐day
public
comment
period
October
18-‐
November
18,
2013
• Working
Group
evaluaon
of
comments,
edits
to
RP,
responses
• Working
Group
approval
(spring)
• Discovery
to
Delivery
Topic
CommiNee
approval
(summer)
• NISO
Publica4on
(summer)
22April 24, 2014
24. Barbara
Fister’s
take
on
the
Five
Laws
of
Library
Science
http://www.slideshare.net/bfister/erl-slides-fister
25. If
you’re
not
acvely
involved
in
geong
what
you
want,
you
don’t
really
want
it.
Peter
McWilliams
from
You
Can't
Afford
the
Luxury
of
a
Nega8ve
Thought
26. Goals
of
NISO
DDA
Iniave
• Create
a
recommended
pracce
to
address
the
complex
issues
around
Demand
Driven
Acquision
of
Monographs
• Develop
a
flexible
model
for
DDA
that
works
for
publishers,
vendors,
aggregators,
and
libraries.
– Flexible,
but
addresses
budget,
consoral
buying,
aggregaon
and
data
management
needs
April 24, 2014 26
27. Timeline
• Appointment
of
working
group
• Informaon
gathering
– Main
survey
completed
– Interviews
– Addi8onal
surveys
• Public
libraries
• consor8a
– Informa8on
gathering
completed
• Comple8on
of
ini8al
draD
• Gathering
of
public
comments
• Comple8on
of
final
report
Aug
2012
Aug
2013
Nov
2013
Mar
2014
Mar-‐Apr
2014
May
2014
April 24, 2014 27
28. Commiqee
members
• Lenny
Allen
Oxford
University
Press
• Stephen
Bosch
University
of
Arizona
• Scoq
Bourns
JSTOR
• Karin
Byström
Uppsala
University
• Terry
Ehling
Project
Muse
• Barbara
Kawecki
YBP
Library
Services
• Lorraine
Keelan
Palgrave
Macmillan
• Michael
Levine-‐Clark
University
of
Denver
• Rochelle
Logan
Douglas
County
Libraries
• Lisa
Mackinder
University
of
California,
Irvine
• Norm
Medeiros
Haverford
College
• Lisa
Nachgall
Wiley
• Kari
Paulson
ProQuest
• Cory
Polonetsky
Elsevier
• Jason
Price
SCELC
• Dana
Sharvit
Ex
Libris
• David
Whitehair
OCLC
April 24, 2014 28
30. Outline
of
DDA
Recommendaons
• Goals
for
DDA
• Choosing
content
to
make
available
• Choosing
a
DDA
model
• Profiling
content
to
include
• Loading
records
• Removing
records
• Assessment
• Preservaon
• Consora
DDA
• Public
Libraries
DDA
April 24, 2014 30
31. 1.
Establishing
Goals
• Four
Broad
Goals
for
DDA
– Saving
Money
– Spending
The
Same
Amount
of
Money
More
Wisely
– Providing
Broader
Access
– Building
a
Permanent
Collecon
via
Patron
Input
April 24, 2014 31
32. 2.
Choosing
Content
to
Make
Available
• Important
Issues
– Not
all
p-‐books
available
as
e-‐books
– No
single
supplier
provides
all
e-‐books
– Not
all
e-‐books
available
via
DDA
or
under
same
models
• Therefore
– More
comprehensive
coverage
requires
more
suppliers
and
more
models
– Broadest
coverage
possible
=
include
print
– Approval
vendors
can
help
manage
DDA
across
mulple
suppliers
• Publishers
should
recognize
that
libraries
may
wish
to
limit
number
of
suppliers,
and
plan
accordingly
April 24, 2014 32
33. 3.
Choosing
DDA
Models
Mix
of
auto-‐purchase
and
Short
Term
Loans
based
on
goals
of
program
• Auto-‐Purchase
– Purchase
triggered
on
the
first
use
longer
than
free
browse
– Purchase
triggered
awer
set
number
of
uses
– Purchase
triggered
awer
set
number
of
STLs
• Short
Term
Loans
(short
term
rental)
– A
set
number
of
STLs
prior
to
auto-‐purchase
– Only
STLs,
with
no
auto-‐purchase
April 24, 2014 33
34. 3.
Choosing
DDA
Models
(cont)
• Evidence-‐based
acquision
– Somemes
only
opon
based
on
plaxorm
capabilies
– Library
and
publisher
should
develop
expectaons
based
on
analysis
of
past
usage
• Publishers
may
wish
to
parcipate
in
some
or
all
models.
• Some
concern
by
publishers
about
sustainability
of
STL
April 24, 2014 34
35. 4.
Profiling
• DDA
profiles
should
be
based
on
the
broadest
definions
possible
within
these
areas,
and
relave
to
goals
of
the
program
– Subject
coverage
should
provide
access
to
a
wide
range
of
content,
even
in
subjects
that
may
not
be
core
– Retrospecve
coverage
for
crical
mass
• Especially
in
programs
that
otherwise
limit
coverage
• May
or
may
not
overlap
with
print
holdings,
depending
on
library
preference
April 24, 2014 35
36. 5.
Loading
Records
• Libraries
should
– Load
records
regularly
and
as
soon
awer
receipt
as
possible
– Load
records
into
as
many
discovery
tools
as
possible
– Code
records
for
easy
suppression
or
removal
– Enrich
metadata
to
increase
discoverability
– Load
point-‐of-‐purchase
records
awer
purchase
to
ease
acquisions
workflow/payment
April 24, 2014 36
37. 6.
Removing
Content
• Libraries
should:
– Remove
records
from
all
discovery
tools
as
soon
as
feasible,
owen
using
supplier’s
delete
file
– Establish
regular
cycle
for
removal
– Maintain
a
record
of
tles
removed
for
assessment
April 24, 2014 37
38. 7.
Assessment
• There
are
mulple
reasons
for
assessment,
so
this
should
be
planned
from
the
start
– Measuring
overall
effecveness
of
the
program
– Measuring
success
at
cost
reducon
– Measuring
usage
– Predicng
future
spending
– Managing
the
consideraon
pool
• Data
sources
might
include
– COUNTER
reports
– Vendor/publisher
supplied
reports
– ILS
or
other
local
data
April 24, 2014 38
39. 8.
Preservaon
Libraries
and
publishers
should
work
together
to
ensure
that
un-‐owned
content
remains
available,
perhaps
in
partnership
with
third-‐
party
soluons
such
as
LOCKSS
and
Porco.
April 24, 2014 39
40. How
DDA
impacts
specific
groups
9.
Consor4a
DDA
Three
basic
models
– Mulplier
(a
mulple
of
list
price
allows
shared
ownership)
– Limited
Use
(shared
ownership,
but
with
a
cap
on
use
before
a
second
copy
purchased)
– Buying
Club
(shared
access
to
consideraon
pool,
but
individual
ownership)
10.
Public
Library
DDA
– Mediated
for
greater
control
(fewer
resources)
– Wish
lists
– Owen
not
through
the
catalog
April 24, 2014 40
45. “Books
have
been
held
hostage
offline
for
far
too
long.
Taking
them
digital
will
unlock
their
real
hidden
value:
the
readers.”
–
Clive
Thompson
The
Future
of
Reading
in
a
Digital
World
in
Wired
Magazine
17.06
(2009)
51. Chapter
verse?
Character
count?
X-‐Path?
Pre/post
mark
hashing?
Some
(imperfect)
loca8on
methods
52. Who’s
done
doing
what?
• NISO
hosted
a
series
of
thought
leader
meengs
in
2012
• Recommended
focus
on
locaon
determinaon
(started
group,
now
disbanded)
• Open
Annotaons
model
based
on
work
with
Open
Annotaon
Collaboraon
• W3C
Annotaons
meeng
last
month
– New
W3C
working
group
forming
as
part
of
their
Digital
Publishing
iniave.
April 24, 2014 52
64. Steering
Commiqee
• Euan
Adie,
Altmetric
• Amy
Brand,
Harvard
University
• Mike
Buschman,
Plum
Analycs
• Todd
Carpenter,
NISO
• Marn
Fenner,
Public
Library
of
Science
(PLoS)
(Chair)
• Michael
Habib,
Reed
Elsevier
• Gregg
Gordon,
Social
Science
Research
Network
(SSRN)
• William
Gunn,
Mendeley
• Neoe
Lagace,
NISO
• Jamie
Liu,
American
Chemical
Society
(ACS)
• Heather
Piwowar,
ImpactStory
• John
Sack,
HighWire
Press
• Peter
Shepherd,
Project
Counter
• Chrisne
Stohn,
Ex
Libris
• Greg
Tananbaum,
SPARC
(Scholarly
Publishing
Academic
Resources
Coalion)
April 24, 2014 64
65. Alterna4ve
Assessment
Ini4a4ve
Phase
1
Mee4ngs
October
9,
2013
-‐
San
Francisco,
CA
December
11,
2013
-‐
Washington,
DC
January
23-‐24
-‐
Philadelphia,
PA
Round
of
1-‐on-‐1
interviews
–
March/Apr
Phase
1
report
expected
in
May
2014
66. Meengs’
General
Format
• Collocated
with
other
industry
meeng
• Morning:
lightning
talks,
post-‐it
brainstorming
• Awernoon:
discussion
groups
– X
– Y
– Z
– Report
back/react
• Live
streamed
(video
recordings
are
available)
April 24, 2014 66
67. Meeng
Lightning
Talks
• Expectaons
of
researchers
• Exploring
disciplinary
differences
in
the
use
of
social
media
in
scholarly
communicaon
• Altmetrics
as
part
of
the
services
of
a
large
university
library
system
• Deriving
altmetrics
from
annotaon
acvity
• Altmetrics
for
Instuonal
Repositories:
Are
the
metadata
ready?
• Snowball
Metrics:
Global
Standards
for
Instuonal
Benchmarking
• Internaonal
Standard
Name
Idenfier
• Altmetric.com,
Plum
Analycs,
Mendeley
reader
survey
• Twiqer
Inconsistency
“Lightning by snowpeak is licensed under
April 24, 2014 67
69. SF
Meeng
–
General
outputs
• The
importance
of
best
pracces
for
media
coverage
of
science
(using
DOIs,
etc.)
• More
Altmetrics
research
is
needed
and
could
be
promoted
through
this
group
• Providing
a
standard
set
of
research
outputs
that
we
can
use
to
compare
different
services
• The
importance
of
use
cases
for
specific
stakeholder
groups
in
driving
the
discussion
forward
April 24, 2014 69
70. SF
Meeng
Discussions
• Business
Use
cases
– Publishers
want
to
serve
authors,
make
money
– People
don’t
value
a
standard,
they
value
something
that
helps
them
– …
Couldn’t
idenfy
a
logical
standard
need
that
actors
in
the
space
would
value,
and
best
pracces
are
of
interest
• Quality
Data
science
– Themes:
context,
validaon,
provenance,
quality,
descripon
metadata
– We'll
never
get
to
the
point
where
assessment
can
be
done
without
a
human
in
the
loop,
but
discovery
and
recommendaon
can
• Definions
– Define
“ALM”
and
“Altmetrics”
– Map
the
landscape
– We'll
never
get
to
the
point
where
assessment
can
be
done
without
a
human
in
the
loop,
but
discovery
and
recommendaon
can
April 24, 2014 70
71. DC
Meeng
Discussions
• Business
and
Use
Cases
• Discovery
– metrics
only
get
generated
if
material
is
discovered
• Qualitave
vs.
Quantave
• Idenfying
Stakeholders
and
their
Values
– stakeholders
in
outcomes
/
stakeholders
in
process
of
creang
metrics
– shared
values
but
tensions
– branding
• Definions/Defining
Impact
– metrics
and
analyses
– what
led
to
success
of
citaon?
– how
to
be
certain
we
are
measuring
the
right
things
• Future
Proofing
– what
won't
change
– impact
-‐
hard
to
establish
across
disciplines
April 24, 2014 71
72. Philly
Meeng
Discussions
• Definions
– Define
life
cycle
of
scholarly
output
and
associated
metrics
– Qualitave
versus
Quantave
aspects
-‐
what
is
possible
to
define
here
– Consider
other
aspects
of
these
data
collecons
• Standards
– Develop
definions
(what
is
a
download?
what
is
a
view?)
– Differenate
between
scholarly
impact
versus
popular/social
use
– Define
sources/characteriscs
for
metrics
(social,
commercial,
scholarly)
• Data
Integrity
– Counter
biases/gaming
– Associaon
with
credible
enes
-‐
e.g.
ORCID
ID
v.
gmail
account
– Reproduceability
is
key
– Everyone
needs
to
be
at
the
table
to
establish
overall
credibility
• Use
cases
(3X)
April 24, 2014 72
73. Alterna4ve
Assessment
Ini4a4ve
Phase
2
Presenta4ons
of
report
(June
2014)
Priori4za4on
Effort
(June
-‐
Aug,
2014)
Project
approval
(Sept
2014)
Working
group
forma4on
(Oct
2014)
Consensus
Development
(Nov
2014
-‐
Dec
2015)
Trial
Use
Period
(Dec
15
-‐
Mar
16)
Publica4on
of
final
recommenda4ons
(Jun
16)
74. Other
work
underway
• Open
Access
Metadata
Indicators
• Bibliographic
data
exchange
• SUSHI-‐lite
profile
• Project
Transfer
formalizaon
• Book
Interchange
Tag
Suite
(BITS)
-‐
Potenal
• Data
transformaon
-‐
Potenal
• Scholarly
data
citaon
-‐
Potenal
• E-‐book
circulaon
data
exchange
-‐
Potenal
April 24, 2014 74