The CEO held a two-day workshop to address issues with strategy implementation in the organization. On day one, groups used a change puzzle kit to analyze the current organization and develop a vision of the future organization. They identified core changes needed. On day two, groups used a game to develop an integrated, detailed implementation plan addressing leadership tasks. The result was an practical plan that excited and motivated the leaders to work together to implement the strategy.
Implications of Organizational Development Organizational Change and Develop...manumelwin
Most individuals believe in their personal growth.
Majority of the people are desirous of making greater contributions to the organizations they are serving.
Too many leaders on too many occasions have been involved in too many failures. We have piqued their curiosity. Leaders now want to know what they specifically need to do to successfully drive the strategy execution through the organization.
Implications of Organizational Development Organizational Change and Develop...manumelwin
Most individuals believe in their personal growth.
Majority of the people are desirous of making greater contributions to the organizations they are serving.
Too many leaders on too many occasions have been involved in too many failures. We have piqued their curiosity. Leaders now want to know what they specifically need to do to successfully drive the strategy execution through the organization.
Strategic Planning
& Goal Setting
ASSESSMENTS:
STRATEGIC PLANNING
GOAL SETTING
White Paper
STRATEGIC PLANNING
Strategic planning is a disciplined effort. In the end, it produces fundamental decisions and actions that shape
and guide what an organization is, who it serves, what it does and why. With a focus on the future, effective strategic
planning also articulates how an organization will know if it is successful. A successful strategic plan sets priorities,
focuses energy and resources, strengthens operations, and ensures that employees and other stakeholders are work-
ing toward common goals. Strategic planning answers three key questions:
• Where are we?
• Where are we going?
• How will we get there?
Where are we?
Consider the foundational elements of your mission statement, values and/or guiding principles, and SWOT
(strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) to assess where your business is — what is happening internally and
externally — and determine what changes you need to make.
Where are we going?
The future is impossible to predict, but contemplating scenarios will focus your attention and help you define the
future for your business. Specifically, compare your organization to your competitors. What do you do best? What
makes you unique? What can your organization potentially do better than any other organization? Answering these
questions will help you formulate a picture of what your future make up will be and where you are headed.
How will we get there?
This is the meat of your strategic plan. It’s also the most time consuming. There are a number of routes from your
current position to your vision, and picking the right one will determine how quickly or slowly you get to your final
destination. Determine your strategy, set short and long term goals, and develop action items to get you there. Iden-
tify issues that surround management and monitoring of the action items.
Remember, strategic planning is about growing and improving your company. When you don’t plan, the best you can
hope for is maintenance of the status quo. Further down the line, you can expect challenges that will significantly
damage or destroy your organization.
The Seven Rules
In addition to answering the three questions above, effective strategic planning requires following 7 critical rules.
1. Pick the right players.
Selecting who should be part of the planning team is an important question. It is essential that planning team mem-
bers are people who are committed to the growth of the company, and who can provide valuable input to the process.
Unless there is a key employee or manager you want to develop, this is not a time to include every member of your
staff. Vet each team member, ensuring each is of the quality and stature (i.e. gets work done and is respected within
the company) required to be part of the planning group. Members of the planning team must maintain complete
2. Strategic Planning & G.
This is about change. Most of the software companies now call it “becoming agile”. Personally, I think the term “agility” is overused and has lost its true meaning.
Regardless where you want the change to occur: be it on how activity in a submarine is performed (like David Marquet explains in his book “Turn the ship around”), in an online e-commerce company (like Tony Hsieh explains in his book “How to deliver Hapiness”) or in really any company (like John Kotter explains in his book “The heart of change”) there are some steps that are taken to produce change.
What I wanted to do is to go through these steps and give examples both from my experience and from the above mentioned books.
Strategic planning is defined as the “enhancing its success by dealing with weaknesses and threats as well as the strengths and opportunities that present themselves to the organisation. It involves selecting from a range of strategies and building a plan to carry out those strategies, including marshaling the resources and organisational elements necessary to carry out the plan and evaluate its performance” (Vargoa & Seville, 2011:5621).
Check out @ www.eleaderstochange.com
Follow: #eleaders2change
NewsTrain instructor Meg Downey helps journalists manage and survive the constant change in the newsroom. She discusses how those in the media industry can use John Kotter's eight steps to managing change. Downey, a two-time Pulitzer finalist, is the former managing editor of The Tennessean in Nashville. She gave this presentation as part of the NewsTrain workshop in Austin, Texas, on Aug. 22-23, 2014. Please see associated handouts: Eight Steps in Managing Change from John Kotter, Four Tips for Changing Culture by Steve Buttry, Facing Change Questions to Ask by Kristin Gilger, Managing through Change by Kristin Gilger, and Sarasota Model for Project Management. For more information about NewsTrain, a traveling workshop for journalists sponsored by Associated Press Media Editors, please visit http://www.apme.com/?AboutNewsTrain.
What is meant by the study of organizational theory, what are th.docxsorayan5ywschuit
What is meant by the study of organizational theory, what are the classifications of organizational theory and their precepts and what can we learn from its history?
Create a time line of Organizational Theories (schools) showing the precepts of each theory/school. Then in a summary paragraph compare the various theories on the time line identifying the trends of perspective that are illustrated by the time line.
Businesses to continue to succeed must always maintain a competitive advantage in the marketplace. The key to doing this has changed over the last century as is illustrated in our discussion in week one of the 21
st
century business challenges. Using your time line explain how the change in obtaining a competitive edge is reflected in the change of organizational theory over the last century?
The change of value regarding human resource to the organization coupled with technology is shifting the design of organizations towards “boundaryless” and flat organizational structures.
Search the Internet and find an example of a boundaryless or flat organization explain how it is human resource centric.
The 21
st
century manager is a person who can implement the leader’s vision by creating processes, procedure, and short term goals that forward, the vision, purpose, culture, and structure set by the leader for the organization. The manager does this through the implementation of the four functions of a manager, planning, organizing, leading, and controlling. The four pillars of management function.
Select an organization that you work for, or have worked for, and identify the vision, mission, organizational structure (including the decision making flow) and the culture of the organization. Where possible use your course material to identify the structural (bureaucratic, flat, horizontal, democratic etc.) or cultural type (clan, collaborative, market, adhocracy etc.). Include in your discussion a definition of the word organization.
Some organizational theorists suggest that the four pillars do not go far enough to explain how the manager should approach the new 21
st
century business landscape and that a systems thinking approach is more comprehensive. Students should compare and contrast with respect to POLC.
Compare and contrast the Fayol’s POLC functions of management with the systems thinking approach and determine which is more comprehensive and explain why. Be sure to explain each of the precepts and how they work.
The manager creates a detailed action plan formulated from the long term goals, vision and mission, set by the leader. This plan is created through planning and strategizing. To understand the concept of vision and mission and its role in the process, you will get to do the leader’s job and formulate the vision and mission of an organization. By creating the vision and mission you should take away the idea of their import in crating your short term plans and goals.
Create a vision and mission statement to.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
2. The organizational problem.
The strategy implementation intervention the
CEO wanted.
The thinking behind the design of the strategy
implementation workshop.
The constraints CEO needed to work within.
The tools CEO decided to use in the two-day
workshop.
The workshop design.
How CEO used The Change Puzzle Kit: Day 1.
How CEO used The Winning the Game of
Change Kit: Day 2.
The end result.
3. The CEO felt quite alone in driving the corporate
strategy. He wished that his team would:
Realize that they needed to work together as a
united team, rather than in separate silos - often
working at cross purposes to one another.
Take responsibility for playing a leadership role in
driving the implementation of the strategy. Many of
them thought that it was enough that he, the CEO
had communicated the strategy and created
projects. They then left it up to their people to flesh
out what needed to be done to implement the
strategy - without providing direction to their own
teams.
4. The CEO was disappointed. He'd spent months with his executive
team developing a new organizational strategy. He'd then spent
weeks flying around the country on a road show to communicate the
new strategy. He set up a number of projects to implement the
strategy. Strategic objectives were put into each of his executives
KPAs.
"I am tired of being the only one driving the strategy!”
But now 6 months later, he felt quite frustrated. When he spoke to
people who were not his direct reports, they were saying that they
needed direction!
They were confused by the many projects that were being
implemented. As they focused on one project, they forgot about the
strategy, the company values and other projects.
Work was being duplicated.
His people were confused.
Different projects were working at cross purposes to one another.
His people simply could not see how everything fitted together.
5. They would do a right brained exercise to look at what the organization
would be like, if it were achieving all the benefits from having
implemented its strategy successfully.
They would look at the elements that would need to be in place for
that vision to work. To do this we would use 'The Ideal Organization Of
The Future charts and cards.
They would then compare what came out of our two charts. From this,
they would choose a few core changes. Changes that move us towards
the future vision they wanted.
they would then use the Winning the Game of Change Kits to develop
a detailed implementation plan. This included:
Who would need to play what role.
A detailed implementation plan. What would be done. How. When.
A training plan.
A way to check progress.
A way to identify and remove barriers.
A way to reinforce the behaviours we needed to implement our
strategy successfully.
6. THE STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION INTERVENTION
THE CEO WANTED
The CEO wanted to hold a 2 day strategy implementation
workshop for his executive team and their direct reports. He
wanted the workshop objective to be:
To help his team to develop a coordinated strategy
implementation plan.
He was quite sure that he didn't want another theoretical
talk shop.
He wanted his team to develop a practical and detailed plan
for implementing the strategy.
One that was simple and clear.
One they would take ownership of - as a team.
One that would excite them.
One they could use to provide direction throughout the
organization.
One that he could use to measure their progress.
7. THE THINKING BEHIND THE DESIGN OF THE
STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION WORKSHOP
CEO needed an intervention that would help his executive and
management team to:
Understand why most companies strategies don't get implemented,
and recognize what they needed to do as leaders, to ensure their
strategies worked.
Help them to see their projects, their company strategy, their values,
and the work each division did, in a holistic way. This would require a
tool that used a combination of systems thinking and visual thinking.
Help them to understand the few areas they would need to focus on,
in an integrated way, as a leadership team.
8. CONT..
Help them to develop a detailed, comprehensive
implementation strategy - which detailed
What specific interventions they would need
to lead.
Who would need to play what role.
What barriers they may need to overcome.
How they would measure progress.
How their would people would keep going
until they achieved success.
9. THE CONSTRAINTS CEO NEEDED TO WORK
WITHIN..
The CEO wanted to achieve all of this in a 2 day
workshop.
There would be 23 people attending the workshop.
10. THE TOOLS CEO DECIDED TO USE IN THE
TWO-DAY WORKSHOP
1. The first tool CEO used was The Change Puzzle Kit
This helped the group use systems thinking to see how their
projects, strategy, values, divisional objectives, KPAs, and other
leadership elements, fitted together into one integrated picture of
the organization. They could then determine what they needed to
work on, to implement their strategy.
CEO had one kit for each group of 8 delegates. Each kit consists of:
Two laminated charts. (A1 size). The first chart is called The
Organization Of Today. The second chart is called The Ideal
Organization Of The Future.
A set of water soluble pens which allows the delegates to write
directly onto the laminated charts. The charts can be wiped clean
and used again.
A box of clue cards to help the groups analyse 20 organizational
elements from a systems thinking perspective, as they complete
their charts.
11. CONT..
2. The second tool he used was an implementation
planning tool called "Winning the Game of Change."
The tool CEO used to develop a strategy
implementation plan was "Winning the Game of
Change."
This kit, in the form of a game, helped the group to
develop a detailed strategy implementation plan for
the entire organization. It contains:
1 laminated chart - with 8 tasks that leaders need to
complete in order to develop an implementation
plan.
A set of clue cards containing examples of best
practices for completing each leadership task.
12. THE WORKSHOP DESIGN
This is the process CEO followed:
To get people thinking outside of their normal divisions, He
divided the larger group into 3 groups of 8 delegates per group.
These groups were mixed so that people of different functions
worked together in each group.
Each group had their own Change Puzzle Kit and Winning the
Game of Change Kit to work with.
He used this diagram to explain the process we would be
following which was:
We would take a 'systems thinking' photograph of organization as it is
today - To do this we would use The Organization of Today charts and
cards.
13.
14. HOW CEO USED THE CHANGE PUZZLE KIT: DAY 1
Step 1. Provide an overview of the change puzzle
CEO provided a quick overview of the change puzzle.
15. Step 2. Analyse the organization of today
2.1 Instructions:
was given the chart "The Organization Of Today" plus the 20 clue
cards about the current organization. They were also given a set of
water soluble pens. They were asked to write on their chart how
they saw the organization as it existed today. They could use the
clue cards to help them. The groups were told that they didn't
need to achieve a consensus.
2.2 Activity:
Each group spent about an hour recording their answers. Then
each group simply read what the other groups had written on their
charts.
2.3 What came out:
The three groups were surprised that their charts looked similar.
What came out clearly was a lack of alignment in the organization.
The different divisions and projects were seen to be pulling in
different directions.
16. Step 3. Groups develop a vision of the
future.
CEO needed the groups to develop a clear vision of what their
organization would look like, if they had successfully
implemented their strategy, and were achieving the benefits
they wanted.
As they developed their right brain picture of their
organization, the groups became energized. They started
feeling proud about what they could achieve together. They
were amazed that they all had a similar view of the future.
What was really happening is that the hard work the CEO and
his team had done in developing and communicating the
strategy, was now being recognized and appreciated. The CEO
was delighted.
17. Step 4. Groups complete The Ideal Organization of the
Future charts.
4.1 Instructions and activity:
CEO then asked the groups to complete the Ideal Organization of the
Future charts. In doing so, He asked them to think about what would need
to be in place for them to achieve the benefits they wanted to get out of
their strategy. he encouraged them to check that each organizational
element supported every other organizational element.
4.2. What came out:
One executive said. 'I finally understand this systems thinking and
alignment stuff. Everything must support everything else.'
At first the groups were very creative about what their organization would
look like, if they achieved the benefits of having implemented their
strategy successfully. Then, as they started checking that every element
supported every other element, they started refining their work. What
came out this time, was a much more focused view of what needed to be
in place for their strategy to be implemented successfully.
18. Step 5. The groups choose core changes.
They now needed to identify a few core changes, to provide a better
focus for our implementation plan.
Once again he remixed the groups. he asked them to choose 3
changes that would:
Help them move towards their "The Ideal Organization Of The Future"
charts.
He asked them to record these changes in a 'From' and 'To' table.
The 'From' would be drawn from "The Organization Of Today" charts.
The 'To' would come from "The Ideal Organization Of The
Future"charts."
The three groups were surprised that they all came out with the same
core changes. This happened because of the systems thinking provided
by The Change Puzzle Kits - and because we kept mixing the groups.
They ended the first day of the workshop by asking the group what
they'd achieved. What came out was that they were excited by their
common focus, and by the clarity of what they needed to accomplish to
successfully implement their strategy.
19. HOW CEO USED THE WINNING THE GAME
OF CHANGE KIT: DAY 2
The groups were now used to working with one another and doing
systems thinking. He remixed the groups and handed each group a
Winning the Game of Change Kit. he explained how the kit worked,
and allowed each group most of the day, to complete the game.
The groups got engaged in the game quite quickly. As they played
the game, they wrote their implementation strategies onto their
charts.
About 2 hours before the session was due to end, he asked for a
representative of each group to work with him, so that we could
integrate all 3 charts into one integrated implementation plan for
the whole organization. While we did this, the rest of the group had
a break. We took about 45 minutes, as most of the groups came up
with similar ideas. This was because of the systems thinking they
had done the previous day, and because they had mixed the groups.
All CEO had to do then, was read the integrated plan back to the
group.
20. THE END RESULT
The executives and managers were
amazed at what they had produced
together. They were delighted at how
practical and exciting their plan was. They
had enjoyed working together. They asked
to have more sessions like this in the
future.
One of them thanked the CEO for the work
he'd done on developing the strategy.
He was quite touched by this appreciation.
The leaders left the session excited and
motivated - and ready to implement their
plan.