Dr. Prashant Jagtap Sr. Interventional Cardiologist Wockhardt Hospitals , NAGPUR Newer Trends in Interventional Cardiology
Cardiovascular Disease  1.2 Million Heart Attacks
Outline
Outline
Coronary Artery Disease Result of accumulation of atherosclerotic plaque  Arteries supplying the heart muscle are occluded Oxygen-rich blood does not reach the heart Symptoms are angina and myocardial infarction  http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/dci/Diseases/Cad/CAD_WhatIs.html
Coronary Atherosclerosis
Angiogram Visualize blockages Catheter is inserted into the leg or arm Contrast dye for visualization X-ray is taken of the arteries Health Care Guideline: Stable Coronary Artery Disease.  Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement . !3th ed., 2009 Other Tests EKG Stress test Echocardiograph Blood work
Treatment Algorithm
Treatments for CAD Health Care Guideline: Stable Coronary Artery Disease.  Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement . !3th ed., 2009
History of Angioplasty  First stainless steel Stent inserted in human artery 1986 2006   30 patients enrolled in the first ever human clinical trial testing a fully  Bioabsorbable Drug-eluting Stent  (ABSORB trial, Abbott) Drug eluting stents introduced to EU and USA markets 2001-2003 1999 First bioabsorbable PLLA stent in human coronary arteries (Igaki-Tamai) 1977 First Coronary Angioplasty Dr. Andreas Gruentzig
Evolution of Angioplasty Lobodzinski, S. S. (2008). Bioabsorbable Coronary Stents.  Cardiology Journal , 15(6), 569-571.  Pros Cons Balloon Angioplasty  Enlarges narrow artery Relieves chest pain  Elastic recoil of artery  High early restenosis  Bare Metal Stents Permanently prop open vessel    less elastic recoil Lower early restenosis  Metal scars endothelial tissue Leads to neointimal growth response Contributes to late restenosis Drug Eluting Stent Antiproliferative drug mitigates adverse response to metal    reduce restenosis  Incomplete healing    induce chronic inflammatory response  Increased risk of thrombosis
 
Video: Stenting Procedure  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvRtP3wl_AY
Outline
Three Generations of Stents  Ormiston et al. (2007). Catheterization and Cardiovascular Intervention, 69: 129-131
Restenosis  http://www.evgn.org/home/imagesnew/stentv2web.jpg Restenosis and  Neo-Intimal Hyperplasia  Tissue re-growth into the stent area
Drug Eluting Stents: The Problem Curfman GD, Morrissey S, Jarcho JA, Drazen JM. Drug-eluting coronary stents—promise and uncertainty.  NEJM . 2007;256:1059-1060
Stent Thrombosis Cola, C. Brugaletta, S., Yuste, V. M., Campos, B., Angiolillo, D. J. & Sabete, M. (2009). Diabetes mellitus: a prothrombotic state implications for outcomes after coronary revascularization.  Vascular Health and Risk Management , 5, 101-119.
Thrombosis: Early vs. Late Events Cola, C. Brugaletta, S., Yuste, V. M., Campos, B., Angiolillo, D. J. & Sabete, M. (2009). Diabetes mellitus: a prothrombotic state implications for outcomes after coronary revascularization.  Vascular Health and Risk Management , 5, 101-119.
DES: The Market Leader  Xience outperforms Taxus Express in SPIRIT IV, Dave Fornell, Diagnostic and Invasive Cardiology. Retrieved on Nov 26th, 2009 from http://www.dicardiology.net/node/34463/3  Sipkoff, M. (2009, Jul 1). Drug-eluting stents make a comeback.  ModernMedicine.  Retrieved online http://www.modernmedicine.com/modernmedicine/Modern+Medicine+Feature+Articles/Drug-eluting-stents-make-a-comeback/ArticleStandard/Article/detail/607928
Stents: Product Label – On or Off?  FDA approved lesion parameters Lesion length < 30 mm Vessel diameter: 2.5 mm to 3.75mm Off label examples Lesion in by pass graft Bifurcation lesion Source: FDA Guidance Document on Drug Eluting Stents
Outline
Kirk. N. Garratt. (2009). Update on DES and Biodegradable Stents 2009
BVS Functionality Ormiston et al. (2007). Catheterization and Cardiovascular Intervention, 69: 129-131
The BVS Stent: Polymers PLLA (Poly-L-Lactic Acid) backbone PDLLA (Poly-D,L-lactic acid) coating  Both degrade to lactic acid Entire stent absorbs in 2 years  Ormiston et al. (2007). Catheterization and Cardiovascular Intervention, 69: 129-131
BVS vs. DES:  The Thrombosis Issue Curfman GD, Morrissey S, Jarcho JA, Drazen JM. Drug-eluting coronary stents—promise and uncertainty.  NEJM . 2007;256:1059-1060 Drug – Eluting Stent Bioabsorbable stent Polymer not biocompatible Polymers are biocompatible All the drug is not eluted 100% drug is eluted in 4 months Incomplete healing of endothelium Complete healing of endothelium Problems with late and  very late ST No reports of ST from  phase I study
Advantages of the BVS Stent
ABSORB: First In-man Study 30 patients, single de novo lesions Composite endpoint:  Cardiac death, Myocardial Infarction, Target lesion revascularization (TLR) Secondary end points: In-stent late loss, late ST Results:  0% thrombosis, 0% TLR, MACE (3.3%) Ormiston et al. (2007). Catheterization and Cardiovascular Intervention, 69: 129-131
Bare-Metal vs. Drug-Eluting vs. Bioabsorbable Stents Results taken from the 2006 Spirit IV trial (3, 690 patients), 2002 Sirius trial (1,058 patients) and the Absorb trial (30 patients). All trials were done in patients with similar lesions. The results reported are after 1-year follow-up.
Second Generation BVS Stent More even support of arterial wall Lower late stent area loss Higher radial strength Ormiston et al. (2007). Catheterization and Cardiovascular Intervention, 69: 129-131
Regulatory Pathway for BVS Based on Drug-Eluting Stents  Drug Eluting Stent  Stent Platform and Delivery System  Drug Carrier “Polymer” PMA – Class III Device  Source: Food and Drug Administration, U.S.A Center for Devices and Regulatory Health  Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
Bioabsorable Vascular Solution
Bioresorbable Device Components Bioresorbable Coating PDLLA coating Fully biodegradable Similar dose and release rate to XIENCE V  Everolimus Poly (Lactic Acid) (PLLA) Naturally  absorbed, fully  metabolized Bioresorbable Device Platform MULTI-LINK VISION Stent Delivery System Seven  generations of MULTI-LINK  success World-class  deliverability  All illustrations are artists’ renditions
Bioabsorbable Vascular Solutions Program Goals Naturally absorbed,  fully metabolized Acutely perform like a metallic DES: deliverability, conformability, radial strength Long-term: restore vasomotion, improved clinical outcomes,  lower restenosis Compatible with  CT imaging
Bioresorbable Polymer Everolimus/PDLLA Matrix Coating Thin coating layer Amorphous (non-crystalline) 1:1 ratio of Everolimus/PLA matrix Conformal Coating, 2-4   m thick Controlled drug release PLLA Backbone Highly crystalline Provides device integrity Processed for increased radial strength Polymer backbone Drug/polymer matrix
Performance Criteria for a Fully Bioresorbable Device 1 3 6 2 Yrs Mos Forrester JS, et al.,  J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.  1991; 17: 758. Full Mass Loss & Bioresorption Platelet Deposition Leukocyte Recruitment SMC Proliferation and Migration Matrix Deposition Re-endothelialization Vascular Function Everolimus Elution Support Mass Loss
ABSORB Cohort A Excellent 3-Year Clinical Data ABSORB Cohort A  3-Year Data: One MACE* (NQMI); No additional MACE between 6 months and 3 years No stent thrombosis  through 3 years Lumen enlargement from  6 months to 2 years by  IVUS and OCT Restoration of vasomotion –  including the treated segment Bioabsorption of device
Key Players in the Bioabsorbable Stent Market
Outline
Quantitative Analysis Assumptions Costs remain the same in:  Cost differential occurs in:  Procedure Initial hospitalization Routine follow-ups Acquisition of stent Serious adverse events Anti-platelet therapy (DAT)  Cohen, D.J. et al. Cost Effectiveness of Sirolimus-Eluting Stents for Treatment of Complex coronary Stenoses. Circulation 2004; 110: 508-514. Cost  Total  = Cost  Stent  + Cost  Serious Adverse Events  + Cost  DAT
Cost-Benefit Analysis of BVS on Thrombosis and TLR Rates Filion, K. B., Roy, A. M., Baboushkin, T., Rinfret, S. & Eisenberg, M. J. (2009). Cost-Effectiveness of Drug-Eluting Stents Including the Economic Impact of Late Stent Thrombosis.  The American Journal of Cardiology,  103(3): 338-44.  Price of stents : $2200 DES (Cypher)  $3000 BVS (Abbott)
Cost Effectiveness(CE) Analysis  Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) The lower the ICER, the better Compare CE of BVS to DES Cohen, D.J. et al. Cost Effectiveness of Sirolimus-Eluting Stents for Treatment of Complex coronary Stenoses. Circulation 2004; 110: 508-514.
Equations for ICER Calculation  Cohen, D.J. et al. Cost Effectiveness of Sirolimus-Eluting Stents for Treatment of Complex coronary Stenoses. Circulation 2004; 110: 508-514. ICER – Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio  BVS – Bioabsorbable Stents SAE – Serious Adverse Events  BMS – Bare Metal Stents DAT – Dual Anti-platelet Therapy  Freq - Frequency
Historical Precedence ICER (BMS vs Balloon)  $5000/SAD Avoided  ICER (DES vs BMS)  $5098/SAD Avoided Cohen, D.J. et al. Cost Effectiveness of Sirolimus-Eluting Stents for Treatment of Complex coronary Stenoses. Circulation 2004; 110: 508-514.
ICER of BVS with Three Estimates of Study Outcome
Stent Feature Matrix  Bare-Metal Stents Drug-eluting Stent Bioabsorbable drug- eluting Stent  Reduced Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy No neointimal hyperplasia  Restoration of Vasomotion Material (Biocompatible) Lobodzinski, S. S. (2008). Bioabsorbable Coronary Stents.  Cardiology Journal , 15(6), 569-571.
Conclusion  Large coronary stent market BVS improves on thrombosis  BVS has the potential to be economically feasible for device manufacturer and healthcare insurers
Acknowledgements Dr. Jayson Parker, M.Biotech Dr. Michael Kutryk, St. Michael’s Hospital Dr. Geoff Puley, Trillium Health Center Jennie Kim, Abbott Vascular, U.S.A Dr. Robert Cottone, Orbis Neich Dr. Janarthan Nikhil, Credit Valley Dr. Sidney Kremer, Credit Valley Dr. Kirandeep Nagi, Credit Valley Joanne Barrette, Abbott Vascular Margaret Chong, Abbott Vascular Dr.  Jeffrey Pang, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center  Dr. Linda Mackeigan, Leslie Dan School of Pharmacy Dr. Peter Seidelin, Toronto General Hospital
Breakthrough Technology for Mitral Regurgitation MITRACLIP video
Thank you for listening. Questions?

Newer trends in interventional cardiology

  • 1.
    Dr. Prashant JagtapSr. Interventional Cardiologist Wockhardt Hospitals , NAGPUR Newer Trends in Interventional Cardiology
  • 2.
    Cardiovascular Disease 1.2 Million Heart Attacks
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.
    Coronary Artery DiseaseResult of accumulation of atherosclerotic plaque Arteries supplying the heart muscle are occluded Oxygen-rich blood does not reach the heart Symptoms are angina and myocardial infarction http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/dci/Diseases/Cad/CAD_WhatIs.html
  • 6.
  • 7.
    Angiogram Visualize blockagesCatheter is inserted into the leg or arm Contrast dye for visualization X-ray is taken of the arteries Health Care Guideline: Stable Coronary Artery Disease. Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement . !3th ed., 2009 Other Tests EKG Stress test Echocardiograph Blood work
  • 8.
  • 9.
    Treatments for CADHealth Care Guideline: Stable Coronary Artery Disease. Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement . !3th ed., 2009
  • 10.
    History of Angioplasty First stainless steel Stent inserted in human artery 1986 2006 30 patients enrolled in the first ever human clinical trial testing a fully Bioabsorbable Drug-eluting Stent (ABSORB trial, Abbott) Drug eluting stents introduced to EU and USA markets 2001-2003 1999 First bioabsorbable PLLA stent in human coronary arteries (Igaki-Tamai) 1977 First Coronary Angioplasty Dr. Andreas Gruentzig
  • 11.
    Evolution of AngioplastyLobodzinski, S. S. (2008). Bioabsorbable Coronary Stents. Cardiology Journal , 15(6), 569-571. Pros Cons Balloon Angioplasty Enlarges narrow artery Relieves chest pain Elastic recoil of artery High early restenosis Bare Metal Stents Permanently prop open vessel  less elastic recoil Lower early restenosis Metal scars endothelial tissue Leads to neointimal growth response Contributes to late restenosis Drug Eluting Stent Antiproliferative drug mitigates adverse response to metal  reduce restenosis Incomplete healing  induce chronic inflammatory response Increased risk of thrombosis
  • 12.
  • 13.
    Video: Stenting Procedure http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvRtP3wl_AY
  • 14.
  • 15.
    Three Generations ofStents Ormiston et al. (2007). Catheterization and Cardiovascular Intervention, 69: 129-131
  • 16.
    Restenosis http://www.evgn.org/home/imagesnew/stentv2web.jpgRestenosis and Neo-Intimal Hyperplasia Tissue re-growth into the stent area
  • 17.
    Drug Eluting Stents:The Problem Curfman GD, Morrissey S, Jarcho JA, Drazen JM. Drug-eluting coronary stents—promise and uncertainty. NEJM . 2007;256:1059-1060
  • 18.
    Stent Thrombosis Cola,C. Brugaletta, S., Yuste, V. M., Campos, B., Angiolillo, D. J. & Sabete, M. (2009). Diabetes mellitus: a prothrombotic state implications for outcomes after coronary revascularization. Vascular Health and Risk Management , 5, 101-119.
  • 19.
    Thrombosis: Early vs.Late Events Cola, C. Brugaletta, S., Yuste, V. M., Campos, B., Angiolillo, D. J. & Sabete, M. (2009). Diabetes mellitus: a prothrombotic state implications for outcomes after coronary revascularization. Vascular Health and Risk Management , 5, 101-119.
  • 20.
    DES: The MarketLeader Xience outperforms Taxus Express in SPIRIT IV, Dave Fornell, Diagnostic and Invasive Cardiology. Retrieved on Nov 26th, 2009 from http://www.dicardiology.net/node/34463/3 Sipkoff, M. (2009, Jul 1). Drug-eluting stents make a comeback. ModernMedicine. Retrieved online http://www.modernmedicine.com/modernmedicine/Modern+Medicine+Feature+Articles/Drug-eluting-stents-make-a-comeback/ArticleStandard/Article/detail/607928
  • 21.
    Stents: Product Label– On or Off? FDA approved lesion parameters Lesion length < 30 mm Vessel diameter: 2.5 mm to 3.75mm Off label examples Lesion in by pass graft Bifurcation lesion Source: FDA Guidance Document on Drug Eluting Stents
  • 22.
  • 23.
    Kirk. N. Garratt.(2009). Update on DES and Biodegradable Stents 2009
  • 24.
    BVS Functionality Ormistonet al. (2007). Catheterization and Cardiovascular Intervention, 69: 129-131
  • 25.
    The BVS Stent:Polymers PLLA (Poly-L-Lactic Acid) backbone PDLLA (Poly-D,L-lactic acid) coating Both degrade to lactic acid Entire stent absorbs in 2 years Ormiston et al. (2007). Catheterization and Cardiovascular Intervention, 69: 129-131
  • 26.
    BVS vs. DES: The Thrombosis Issue Curfman GD, Morrissey S, Jarcho JA, Drazen JM. Drug-eluting coronary stents—promise and uncertainty. NEJM . 2007;256:1059-1060 Drug – Eluting Stent Bioabsorbable stent Polymer not biocompatible Polymers are biocompatible All the drug is not eluted 100% drug is eluted in 4 months Incomplete healing of endothelium Complete healing of endothelium Problems with late and very late ST No reports of ST from phase I study
  • 27.
  • 28.
    ABSORB: First In-manStudy 30 patients, single de novo lesions Composite endpoint: Cardiac death, Myocardial Infarction, Target lesion revascularization (TLR) Secondary end points: In-stent late loss, late ST Results: 0% thrombosis, 0% TLR, MACE (3.3%) Ormiston et al. (2007). Catheterization and Cardiovascular Intervention, 69: 129-131
  • 29.
    Bare-Metal vs. Drug-Elutingvs. Bioabsorbable Stents Results taken from the 2006 Spirit IV trial (3, 690 patients), 2002 Sirius trial (1,058 patients) and the Absorb trial (30 patients). All trials were done in patients with similar lesions. The results reported are after 1-year follow-up.
  • 30.
    Second Generation BVSStent More even support of arterial wall Lower late stent area loss Higher radial strength Ormiston et al. (2007). Catheterization and Cardiovascular Intervention, 69: 129-131
  • 31.
    Regulatory Pathway forBVS Based on Drug-Eluting Stents Drug Eluting Stent Stent Platform and Delivery System Drug Carrier “Polymer” PMA – Class III Device Source: Food and Drug Administration, U.S.A Center for Devices and Regulatory Health Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
  • 32.
  • 33.
    Bioresorbable Device ComponentsBioresorbable Coating PDLLA coating Fully biodegradable Similar dose and release rate to XIENCE V Everolimus Poly (Lactic Acid) (PLLA) Naturally absorbed, fully metabolized Bioresorbable Device Platform MULTI-LINK VISION Stent Delivery System Seven generations of MULTI-LINK success World-class deliverability All illustrations are artists’ renditions
  • 34.
    Bioabsorbable Vascular SolutionsProgram Goals Naturally absorbed, fully metabolized Acutely perform like a metallic DES: deliverability, conformability, radial strength Long-term: restore vasomotion, improved clinical outcomes, lower restenosis Compatible with CT imaging
  • 35.
    Bioresorbable Polymer Everolimus/PDLLAMatrix Coating Thin coating layer Amorphous (non-crystalline) 1:1 ratio of Everolimus/PLA matrix Conformal Coating, 2-4  m thick Controlled drug release PLLA Backbone Highly crystalline Provides device integrity Processed for increased radial strength Polymer backbone Drug/polymer matrix
  • 36.
    Performance Criteria fora Fully Bioresorbable Device 1 3 6 2 Yrs Mos Forrester JS, et al., J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1991; 17: 758. Full Mass Loss & Bioresorption Platelet Deposition Leukocyte Recruitment SMC Proliferation and Migration Matrix Deposition Re-endothelialization Vascular Function Everolimus Elution Support Mass Loss
  • 37.
    ABSORB Cohort AExcellent 3-Year Clinical Data ABSORB Cohort A 3-Year Data: One MACE* (NQMI); No additional MACE between 6 months and 3 years No stent thrombosis through 3 years Lumen enlargement from 6 months to 2 years by IVUS and OCT Restoration of vasomotion – including the treated segment Bioabsorption of device
  • 38.
    Key Players inthe Bioabsorbable Stent Market
  • 39.
  • 40.
    Quantitative Analysis AssumptionsCosts remain the same in: Cost differential occurs in: Procedure Initial hospitalization Routine follow-ups Acquisition of stent Serious adverse events Anti-platelet therapy (DAT) Cohen, D.J. et al. Cost Effectiveness of Sirolimus-Eluting Stents for Treatment of Complex coronary Stenoses. Circulation 2004; 110: 508-514. Cost Total = Cost Stent + Cost Serious Adverse Events + Cost DAT
  • 41.
    Cost-Benefit Analysis ofBVS on Thrombosis and TLR Rates Filion, K. B., Roy, A. M., Baboushkin, T., Rinfret, S. & Eisenberg, M. J. (2009). Cost-Effectiveness of Drug-Eluting Stents Including the Economic Impact of Late Stent Thrombosis. The American Journal of Cardiology, 103(3): 338-44. Price of stents : $2200 DES (Cypher) $3000 BVS (Abbott)
  • 42.
    Cost Effectiveness(CE) Analysis Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) The lower the ICER, the better Compare CE of BVS to DES Cohen, D.J. et al. Cost Effectiveness of Sirolimus-Eluting Stents for Treatment of Complex coronary Stenoses. Circulation 2004; 110: 508-514.
  • 43.
    Equations for ICERCalculation Cohen, D.J. et al. Cost Effectiveness of Sirolimus-Eluting Stents for Treatment of Complex coronary Stenoses. Circulation 2004; 110: 508-514. ICER – Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio BVS – Bioabsorbable Stents SAE – Serious Adverse Events BMS – Bare Metal Stents DAT – Dual Anti-platelet Therapy Freq - Frequency
  • 44.
    Historical Precedence ICER(BMS vs Balloon) $5000/SAD Avoided ICER (DES vs BMS) $5098/SAD Avoided Cohen, D.J. et al. Cost Effectiveness of Sirolimus-Eluting Stents for Treatment of Complex coronary Stenoses. Circulation 2004; 110: 508-514.
  • 45.
    ICER of BVSwith Three Estimates of Study Outcome
  • 46.
    Stent Feature Matrix Bare-Metal Stents Drug-eluting Stent Bioabsorbable drug- eluting Stent Reduced Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy No neointimal hyperplasia Restoration of Vasomotion Material (Biocompatible) Lobodzinski, S. S. (2008). Bioabsorbable Coronary Stents. Cardiology Journal , 15(6), 569-571.
  • 47.
    Conclusion Largecoronary stent market BVS improves on thrombosis BVS has the potential to be economically feasible for device manufacturer and healthcare insurers
  • 48.
    Acknowledgements Dr. JaysonParker, M.Biotech Dr. Michael Kutryk, St. Michael’s Hospital Dr. Geoff Puley, Trillium Health Center Jennie Kim, Abbott Vascular, U.S.A Dr. Robert Cottone, Orbis Neich Dr. Janarthan Nikhil, Credit Valley Dr. Sidney Kremer, Credit Valley Dr. Kirandeep Nagi, Credit Valley Joanne Barrette, Abbott Vascular Margaret Chong, Abbott Vascular Dr. Jeffrey Pang, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center Dr. Linda Mackeigan, Leslie Dan School of Pharmacy Dr. Peter Seidelin, Toronto General Hospital
  • 49.
    Breakthrough Technology forMitral Regurgitation MITRACLIP video
  • 50.
    Thank you forlistening. Questions?

Editor's Notes

  • #2 Coronary atherosclerotic disease remains the leading cause of mortality in the industrialized world. One American dies from coronary heart disease (CHD) every minute, with an estimated 1.2 million MIs occurring annually in the United States. 1 With the epidemic of obesity in this country and Americans&apos; increasingly sedentary lifestyle, more patients are at risk of developing CHD than ever before (jaapa article) Need better treatments A million Americans undergo procedures to treat blocked arteries every year
  • #4 Decision to be made and decision criteria
  • #5 Decision to be made and decision criteria
  • #10 -expand on CABG Stents improve the diameter of the arteries  add link to procedure after here:
  • #15 Decision to be made and decision criteria
  • #16 http://www.topnews.in/files/Drug-eluting22.jpg , http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2005/08/18/business/stent.span.jpg , http://www.dicardiology.net/files/D0909_Abbott_ABSORB%20BVS%20stent.jpg Bare Metal Stents No coating Mesh-like tube of wire Drug-Eluting Stents Metal stent platform Polymer coating + drug Bioabsorbable stents Polymer stent platform Polymer coating + drug
  • #18 Incomplete healing Raw sub-endothelial layer  platelet activating Platalet aggregation  thrombotic event Also, 90% of drug locked in leaches out over time in small amounts preventing healing  late thrombosis DAT given for 1 yr  after DAT period, risk of thrombosis increases
  • #21 Late-stent thrombosis issues – decline following head-to-head trials – increase in market again Xience V by Abbott – current market leader DES : 90% of market by ‘06 Decline to 60% in ‘07 Increased to 70% by ‘09
  • #23 Decision to be made and decision criteria
  • #26 http://www.medgadget.com/archives/img/56675trii.jpg
  • #28 Use these as features that are used Improved Lesion Imaging Angiography – GOLD standard but high cost and invasive CT – improved resolution and high negative predictive value
  • #29 What is non Q wave? – look it up
  • #30 **change TLR to 0%
  • #31 More uniform strut distribution Unchanged: Material thickness Strut thickness
  • #40 Decision to be made and decision criteria
  • #41 This is evidenced by comparable value of the above-mentioned cost associated with drug eluting stents and bare metal stents in studies compiled and compared the individual billing information of patients on drug eluting stents and bare metal stents.  New equations from Shirley
  • #42 -mention stent price is assumed for BVS Second price point same slide Literature of comparison for these #s
  • #43 Analytical tool used by insurance agencies for reimbursement
  • #44 This is evidenced by comparable value of the above-mentioned cost associated with drug eluting stents and bare metal stents in studies compiled and compared the individual billing information of patients on drug eluting stents and bare metal stents.  New equations from Shirley
  • #47 Neointimal Growth Response  changed to positive growth response, meanin
  • #49 Need to put M biotech logo as well a