Ten arguments presented by supporters of high-stakes testing associated with No Child Left Behind are summarized from the given document. The arguments include that high-stakes tests motivate students and teachers, ensure important topics are taught, provide accountability, are good measures of curriculum, create equal opportunities, and help improve instruction, learning, and professional development. However, the document also notes potential issues with these arguments raised by Nichols and Berliner.

1. Ten Arguments for Testing from NCLB Supporters: What are your thoughts on these arguments presented by Nichols and Berliner (2007, pages 9-16)? Nichols, Sharon L. & Berliner, David C. (2007). Collateral Damage: How High-Stakes Testing Corrupts America’s Schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.