The document contains an evaluation by Thea Jennings of their production process for a music video. It discusses the strengths and weaknesses of their research, planning, time management, technical qualities of camerawork and editing, aesthetic qualities, audience appeal, and peer feedback received. Key strengths included mind maps exploring ideas, visual planning tools, and telling a good story through editing. Weaknesses included lack of organization, not completing the project on time, and needing additional camera shots. The evaluation seeks feedback on improving future projects.

1. EVALUATIO
NThea Jennings

2. PRODUCTION
PROCESS
EVALUATION

3. RESEARCH
• What were the strengths of your research? How did your
research help your product?
My strengths of my research was that I made three different
mind maps exploring different ideas on my music video and
my research helped my product by helping me decide on the
main idea for my music video.
• What were the weaknesses of your research? What could
you have done better/improve? What effect would this
have had on your product?
The weaknesses of my research were that I just copy and
pasted from my music video theory PowerPoint and I could
you have done better by getting new ideas from other
music videos and the effect that this would have had on
your product that it wouldn't have been focused on just
one idea

4. PLANNING
• What were the strengths of your planning? How did your
planning help your product?
My strengths of my planning was that I did concept boards, a
rip-omatic, a structural breakdown and storyboards for the
visual planning for my music video and this helped
my product by giving me a clear visual idea of what my
music video wanted to look like.
• What were the weaknesses of your planning? What could
you have done better/improve? What effect would this
have had on your product?
The weaknesses of my planning were that I struggled with
my organisational planning and I could you have done
better by organising my schedule better by knowing when
the due date of my project was going to be and the effect
that this would have on my project is that it will be late
coming through

5. TIME MANAGEMENT
•Did you manage your time well? Did you complete your
project on time or would your products have improved
with additional time?
I didn't manage my time well and didn't complete project
on time and I think my product would have improved with
additional time
•What would you have done if you had more time to
produce your work?
•I would have filmed more scenes for my music video if I
had more time to produce my work

6. TECHNICAL QUALITIES -
CAMERA
These are all mid shots from music videos and the similarities between these
shots is that my music video is shot with mid shots

7. TECHNICAL QUALITIES –
EDITING/POST
This is a music video edited to make it look black and white and the similarities
between this is that my music video is edited to make it look black and white and
the differences between these products is that the Chris brown music video has a
lip sync whereas my video does not.

8. AESTHETIC QUALITIES
My work looks good and creative, but I would like to improve it with better
camra shots and the strengths of my projects are that my music video is well
edited and tells a good story and the weakness is that it has not enough
camera shots as I would have hoped for.

9. AUDIENCE APPEAL
I have appealed to my target audience by making a music video on the topic of
loneliness and I think this appeals to them because many teenagers feel lonely
and I have also appealed to my audience by having a teenage character as my
main character in the music video.

10. PEER
FEEDBACK

11. FEEDBACK 1
What did you like about the product?
What improvements could have been made to the
product?

12. FEEDBACK 2
What did you like about the product?
What improvements could have been made to the
product?

13. FEEDBACK 3
What did you like about the product?
What improvements could have been made to the
product?

14. PEER FEEDBACK SUMMARY
What do you agree with from your peer feedback?
What do you disagree with from your peer feedback?

15. PEER FEEDBACK SUMMARY