The document summarizes several models of group development:
1) Tuckman's model identifies 5 stages - forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning that groups progress through.
2) Cog's Ladder model outlines 5 levels of group interaction from polite to esprit.
3) Gersick's punctuated equilibrium model suggests groups with shared experiences can work cohesively without forming, storming, and norming, but may go through these stages when realizing time constraints.
4) FIRO-B measures three interpersonal needs - inclusion, control, and affection - on expressed and wanted dimensions in group settings.
GROUP FORMATION
By
Sunil Sunny
2nd MBA
GROUP
According to Stephen Robbins
“ A group may be defined as two or more individuals, interacting and interdependent, who have come together to achieve a particular objective.
Characteristics of a Group
1.Social Interaction
2.Stable Structure
3.Common Interest
4.Perceive Themselves As Part Of Group
Types Of Groups
1.Primary And Secondary Groups
2.Membership Groups and Reference Group
3.nterest Vs Friendship Groups
4.Formal and Informal Groups
5.Temporary And Permanent Groups
Stages Of Group Formation
1.Forming
2.Storming
3.Norming
4.Performing
5.Adjourning
Forming
1.Strong dependence on leader
2.A great uncertainty
3.Simple Ideas
4.Avoidance of serious topics
5.Minimum feedback
Storming
1.Strongly expressed views
2.Challenging other’s ideas
3.Challenging leadership, Authority and position
4.Withdrawal by some group members
5.Lack of collaboration, competing for control
6.High level of reacting or defending
Norming
1.Active listening
2.Shared leadership
3.Methodical systematic ways of working
4.Receptiveness to other’s ideas
5.Active participation by all
6.Conflict seen as mutual problems
7.Open exchange of ideas
Performing
1.High creativity
2.Openness and trust
3.Strong relationships
4.High achievement
Adjourning
Adjourning, is the break-up of the group, hopefully when their task is completed successfully, their purpose full filled
Recognition of and sensitivity to peoples vulnerabilities is helpful.
Why People Indulge In Groups
1.Companionship
2.Survival and security
3.Affiliation and status
4.Power and control
5.Achievement
Thanks
This is a quick overview of team leadership. It does not go into alot of detail, it is mainly a "What is Team Leadership All About Anyway" type of presentation.
GROUP FORMATION
By
Sunil Sunny
2nd MBA
GROUP
According to Stephen Robbins
“ A group may be defined as two or more individuals, interacting and interdependent, who have come together to achieve a particular objective.
Characteristics of a Group
1.Social Interaction
2.Stable Structure
3.Common Interest
4.Perceive Themselves As Part Of Group
Types Of Groups
1.Primary And Secondary Groups
2.Membership Groups and Reference Group
3.nterest Vs Friendship Groups
4.Formal and Informal Groups
5.Temporary And Permanent Groups
Stages Of Group Formation
1.Forming
2.Storming
3.Norming
4.Performing
5.Adjourning
Forming
1.Strong dependence on leader
2.A great uncertainty
3.Simple Ideas
4.Avoidance of serious topics
5.Minimum feedback
Storming
1.Strongly expressed views
2.Challenging other’s ideas
3.Challenging leadership, Authority and position
4.Withdrawal by some group members
5.Lack of collaboration, competing for control
6.High level of reacting or defending
Norming
1.Active listening
2.Shared leadership
3.Methodical systematic ways of working
4.Receptiveness to other’s ideas
5.Active participation by all
6.Conflict seen as mutual problems
7.Open exchange of ideas
Performing
1.High creativity
2.Openness and trust
3.Strong relationships
4.High achievement
Adjourning
Adjourning, is the break-up of the group, hopefully when their task is completed successfully, their purpose full filled
Recognition of and sensitivity to peoples vulnerabilities is helpful.
Why People Indulge In Groups
1.Companionship
2.Survival and security
3.Affiliation and status
4.Power and control
5.Achievement
Thanks
This is a quick overview of team leadership. It does not go into alot of detail, it is mainly a "What is Team Leadership All About Anyway" type of presentation.
introduction to organiation, introduction to culture, role of organisational culture, importance of organisational culture, various types of organisational culture, rtc.
Group, Types of Groups, Group formation and its stages, Teams, Types of Teams, Team Vs Group, Group Norms, Group cohesiveness, Group size, Leadership - Meaning, Leader Vs Manager, Leadership Styles.
introduction to organiation, introduction to culture, role of organisational culture, importance of organisational culture, various types of organisational culture, rtc.
Group, Types of Groups, Group formation and its stages, Teams, Types of Teams, Team Vs Group, Group Norms, Group cohesiveness, Group size, Leadership - Meaning, Leader Vs Manager, Leadership Styles.
Psyhcological reasons and obstacles for cooperation in groupsClaudia Matini
What does promote or hinder cooperative relations? How do we decide to cooperate or not?
Since, education plays a significant role in the creation of attitudes, this presentation is focused on the Cooperative learning method of instruction as a powerful instrument to promote non competitive interactions, both with adults and with young people. Its value is analysed in Transactional Analysis terms.
The OBREAU Tipod: A Tool for Finding Gold among the RubbleEric Kaufman
This was presented for the Association of Leadership Educators annual conference as a highly interactive session in which participants gained experience in applying three practices - Working from Observation, Attributing Reasonableness, and Speaking with Authenticity (OBREAU) - to support conversations for change on tough issues. We began with discussion of a scenario applicable to leadership educators and used the scenario to introduce and illustrate the practices of the OBREAU Tripod. Then, participants applied the practices to personal leadership-related challenges they face and discussed the results in small groups. Large group discussion explored implications, opportunities and challenges for leadership action. Participants benefited through exposure to a framework they can utilize for more mindful, creative and deep-reaching engagement with others on virtually any tough issue.
Chapter 8_ Foundations of Group Behavior.pptMadihaBaloch7
This is a presentation on chapter no 8, foundation of group behavior by Stephen p.robbins book eighth edition. It will be helpful for you to learn and make your own presentation.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptxEduSkills OECD
Andreas Schleicher presents at the OECD webinar ‘Digital devices in schools: detrimental distraction or secret to success?’ on 27 May 2024. The presentation was based on findings from PISA 2022 results and the webinar helped launch the PISA in Focus ‘Managing screen time: How to protect and equip students against distraction’ https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/managing-screen-time_7c225af4-en and the OECD Education Policy Perspective ‘Students, digital devices and success’ can be found here - https://oe.cd/il/5yV
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
This is a presentation by Dada Robert in a Your Skill Boost masterclass organised by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan (EFSS) on Saturday, the 25th and Sunday, the 26th of May 2024.
He discussed the concept of quality improvement, emphasizing its applicability to various aspects of life, including personal, project, and program improvements. He defined quality as doing the right thing at the right time in the right way to achieve the best possible results and discussed the concept of the "gap" between what we know and what we do, and how this gap represents the areas we need to improve. He explained the scientific approach to quality improvement, which involves systematic performance analysis, testing and learning, and implementing change ideas. He also highlighted the importance of client focus and a team approach to quality improvement.
The Art Pastor's Guide to Sabbath | Steve ThomasonSteve Thomason
What is the purpose of the Sabbath Law in the Torah. It is interesting to compare how the context of the law shifts from Exodus to Deuteronomy. Who gets to rest, and why?
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
2. Tuckman’s Model 1965
O Forming
O Storming
O Norming
O Performing
O Adjorning (Tuckman & Jensen 1977)
3. Tuckman’s Model 1965
O Forming – Range of emotions experienced as
people start to get to know each other in a
group
O Storming – conflict, struggle for power push
boundaries set up in forming stage
O Norming – people come together – resolve
differences, roles taking up, see the goal move
towards it.
O Performing – Achieving the goal, team working
smoothly, no friction.
O Adjourning – ending stage of the group, find it
hard to leave strong relationships, uncertain
about future
O https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hEJaz3sinE
s
4. Cog’s Ladder
O Polite stage
O Why are we here stage
O Bid for power
O Constructive
O Espirit
5. Cog’s Ladder
• Esprit – Creativity, trust, support, caring, openness,
respect, acceptance, etc.
• Constructive – Listening Co-operation, shared
leadership, group Identity, etc.
• Bid for Power – Competition, win-lose arguments,
withdrawing, controlling, criticism, etc.
• Why are we here? Clarifying purpose, sharing
values, forming cliques, some risk taking
questioning
• Polite – Getting acquainted, sharing info, holding
back, seeking approval, hidden agendas, low
conflict, etc.
6. Gersick (1988)
O Punctuated equilibrium model
O Different from the stage model of group
development
O Workers do not form, storm and norm about goal
or task at hand as they share common scripts
(experiences about the task at hand and their
roles) therefore can immediately work as a group
cohesively.
O Up to a point when the group realizes the time has
passed they begin to storm and question the
project and the intended outcomes future direction
and when groups come together with different
scripts they usually have to form storm and norm
before they can work together collectively and
cohesively
9. Firo B Model
O Fundamental
O Interpersonal
O Relations
O Orientation
O (Behavior)
What FIRO B measures is how you act
around other people and how you expect
them to act around you
10. Firo B Model
What FIRO B measure Identifies three areas
of interpersonal need. What people
seek/need or act in a group setting.
O Inclusion
O Control
O Affection
11. Firo B Model
Within those there are two dimensions
within these.
O Expressed
O Wanted
Editor's Notes
Simmillar models to this one that you guys might be interested in.
Tubbs -Group Communication theory
Orientation
Conflict
Consensus
Closure
Fishers Model
Orientation (Awkward)
Conflict
Emergence
Reinforcement
Wheelan (IMGD)
Dependency/inclusion
Counter dependency /fight
Trust/structure
Work/productivity
Termination
And also Coggs latter is very similar – what it tells us is that when we have multiple research of theories that the more evidence we have to suggest and idea. So there must be some relevance to Tuckman’s Model, best evidence suggest that groups do go through a stage of forming, storming, norming and performing and Adjorning
Forming
In this stage, most team members are positive and polite. Some are anxious, as they haven't fully understood what work the team will do. Others are simply excited about the task ahead. As leader, you play a dominant role at this stage, because team members' roles and responsibilities aren't clear. This stage can last for some time, as people start to work together, and as they make an effort to get to know their new colleagues.
Storming
Next, the team moves into the storming phase, where people start to push against the boundaries established in the forming stage. This is the stage where many teams fail. Storming often starts where there is a conflict between team members' natural working styles. People may work in different ways for all sorts of reasons, but if differing working styles cause unforeseen problems, they may become frustrated.
Storming can also happen in other situations. For example, team members may challenge your authority, or jockey for position as their roles are clarified. Or, if you haven't defined clearly how the team will work, people may feel overwhelmed by their workload, or they could be uncomfortable with the approach you're using. Some may question the worth of the team's goal, and they may resist taking on tasks.
Team members who stick with the task at hand may experience stress, particularly as they don't have the support of established processes, or strong relationships with their colleagues.
Norming
Gradually, the team moves into the norming stage. This is when people start to resolve their differences, appreciate colleagues' strengths, and respect your authority as a leader. Now that your team members know one-another better, they may socialize together, and they are able to ask each other for help and provide constructive feedback. People develop a stronger commitment to the team goal, and you start to see good progress towards it. There is often a prolonged overlap between storming and norming, because, as new tasks come up, the team may lapse back into behavior from the storming stage.
Performing
The team reaches the performing stage when hard work leads, without friction, to the achievement of the team's goal. The structures and processes that you have set up support this well. As leader, you can delegate much of your work, and you can concentrate on developing team members. It feels easy to be part of the team at this stage, and people who join or leave won't disrupt performance.
Adjourning
Many teams will reach this stage eventually. For example, project teams exist for only a fixed period, and even permanent teams may be disbanded through organizational restructuring. Team members who like routine, or who have developed close working relationships with other team members, may find this stage difficult, particularly if their future now looks uncertain.
Very similar to Tuckman’s model - "Cog's Ladder: A Model of Group Growth", by George O. Charrier, an employee of Procter and Gamble, published in a company newsletter in 1972. The original document was written to help group managers at Procter and Gamble better understand the dynamics of group work, thus improving efficiency. It is now also used by the United States Naval Academy, the United States Air Force Academy, and other businesses - to help in understanding group development.
Gersick's study of naturally occurring groups departs from the traditionally linear models of group development. Her punctuated equilibrium model (Gersick, 1988, 1989, 1991) suggests that groups develop through the sudden formation, maintenance, and sudden revision of a "framework for performance". This model describes the processes through which such frameworks are formed and revised and predicts both the timing of progress and when and how in their development groups are likely, or unlikely, to be influenced by their environments. The specific issues and activities that dominate groups' work are left unspecified in the model, since groups' historical paths are expected to vary. Her proposed model works in the following way.
When groups come together to work on a task, they may go through what has been called 'punctuated equilibrium'.
When groups form, they rapidly work out task goals and how they will proceed. They then work around the agreed schedule until they realize that the original plan is inadequate. They then re-plan and set off in the new direction. A typical key factor is time. As the delivery milestone approaches the group realizes that they will not make it in time and so hurriedly revise their plans.This 'punctuation' of the work may be repeated a number of times as the team finds that subsequent plans are inadequate. It often happens once, particularly when there is no time to change plans several times. Gersick (1988) noted that groups she was studying did not follow defined stages (notably Tuckman's model), which led her to search for a new model that would explain her observations. Okhuysen and Waller (2002) noted that not everyone understood the need for change at the punctuation points and might continue working to the original plan. A critical factor in this effect is where insufficient time is taken up front to plan properly. With a need to demonstrate action and get into the 'real work', an effective investigation and planning phase is significantly reduced, setting up the 'act now, pay later' pattern.It is notable that poor quality results can result when teams keep to the original timescale and revise their plans to reduce testing and other quality assurance activities. It is often feasible to hide these cuts with the real costs not being realized until long after the team has disbanded. This pattern is particularly common in software development where the construction of the product is invisible to outsiders.
When you think about the All blacks –
They pick a team from all other teams – and they come together and perform without the forming, storming (stage model)
Even though thy come from different backgrounds, ages, experience – they can come together for a week and win and over time they get better and better – when they lose they then have to revise their plan knowing time is not on their side and then they again work as one.
Dr. Will Schutz Psychologist 1925-2002 Originator of FIRO-B® (1958)
Inclusion. Is about - recognition, belonging, participation, contact with others, & how you relate to groups
(refers to being involved with others)
Control is about influence, leadership,responsibility & decision making(refers to power)
Affection is about closeness, warmth, sensitivity, openness & how you relate to others(refers to being ‘up close & personal’)
Expressed refers to the behavior we express to others within a group – this behavior is initiated by you
Expressed Inclusion: how often do you act in ways that encourage your participation in situations?
Expressed Control: how often do you act in ways that help you direct or influence situations?
Expressed Affection: how often do you act in ways that encourage warmth and closeness in relationships?
Wanted – how the person wants other to behave towards them. The behavior that is desired or wished by you
Wanted Inclusion: how much do you want to be part of others’ activities?
Wanted Control: how much leadership and influence do you want others to assume?
Wanted Affection: how much warmth and closeness do you want from others?
