COMS2013, Enschede, The Netherlands 27.08.2013 – Dirk Ortloff
The MEMS Industry Groups Technology
Development Process Template (TDP)
Improving multi-site, multi-disciplinary MEMS development
collaboration
CONFIDENTIAL
Process Relations GmbH
Slide 2
Negative Data
Comic by: Nik Papageorgiou http://upmic.wordpress.com/
CONFIDENTIAL
Process Relations GmbH
Slide 3
Negative Data
Comic by: Nik Papageorgiou http://upmic.wordpress.com/
CONFIDENTIAL
Process Relations GmbH
Slide 4
Negative Data
Comic by: Nik Papageorgiou http://upmic.wordpress.com/
CONFIDENTIAL
Process Relations GmbH
Slide 5
Negative Data
Comic by: Nik Papageorgiou http://upmic.wordpress.com/
CONFIDENTIAL
Process Relations GmbH
Slide 6
Why do I show this? – What are the challenges behind
this?
 Inappropiate data management in
R&D
 Inappropiate collaboration
methodology
CONFIDENTIAL
Process Relations GmbH
Slide 7
Agenda
 Quick company introduction
 The challenges in collaborative MEMS development
 The methodological approach – MIG TDP Template
 The next level – CORONA Methodology
 Conclusions
COMS2013, Enschede, The Netherlands 27.08.2013 – Dirk Ortloff
About Process Relations GmbH
CONFIDENTIAL
Process Relations GmbH
Slide 9
Process Relations’ Mission
…is to enable you to…
Expedite your R&D with improved Methodology and
flexible Software solutions
 Next generation recipe and DoE management
 Virtual manufacturing data management
 Automated data collection from various sources
 Experimental data management, analysis and extraction
We deliver the easy to use, unique, world class Process
Development Execution System (PDES)
and consulting services.
CONFIDENTIAL
Process Relations GmbH
Slide 10
PDES Coverage of other Manufacturing Solutions
Business SystemsERP
Enterprise IT SW Infrastructure
CRMMDM
Inbound
Supply Chain
Systems
SCP
etc.
etc.
Operations
Management
Systeme
PDES
MES
EMS LIMS
Operations IT SW Infrastructure
Design &
Engineering
Systems
Control and
Automation Systems
RTD
AmHS /
MCS
SPC
APC
Manufacturing Tools
EI
RMS
QMS
Shipping
Outbound
Systems
TMS
etc.
SRM
Doc-
Mgt
PLM
DwH
etc.
Doc-
Mgt
COMS2013, Enschede, The Netherlands 27.08.2013 – Dirk Ortloff
The challenges in collaborative
MEMS development
CONFIDENTIAL
Process Relations GmbH
Slide 12
The challenges
 25% development projects reach the market
 of those 66% fail their original expectations
 20% of projects take too long and miss their market
window
 35% of companies experience runaway projects
 40% of R&D experiments are repeated
Source: IDC “Accelerating Science-Led Innovation for
Competitive Advantage” Feb. 2012
CONFIDENTIAL
Process Relations GmbH
Slide 13
Difficulties in collaborative MEMS development
 Wealth of information / technologies / data / …
 Diverse Variances, Options and Variability
 Multi-disciplinary teams required
 Collaboration along the value chain
CONFIDENTIAL
Process Relations GmbH
Slide 14
Collaboration challenges
 MEMS Development Phases must include Foundry
at early stages with multi-disciplinary team
 Design Review must be done for a transfer from
R&D Lab to High Volume Manufacturing
 …
14
Fabless Houses
Design Houses
Design Centres
MEMS Process
Development
Specialists
Assembly & Test
Houses
(Wafer) Foundry Services, Semiconductor
Contract Munufacturer (SCM)
Integrated Semiconductor(Device Manufacturer (ISM/IDM)
Distributors,
Fabless Houses,
Wholesalers,
Trading
Companies
CONFIDENTIAL
Process Relations GmbH
Slide 15
Difficulties in collaborative MEMS development
 Question: How to manage for fast time
to market?
CONFIDENTIAL
Process Relations GmbH
Slide 16
Historical Collaboration between Design and Process
 Microlelectronics:
Clear separation between manufacturing and
application development
 Micro Nano Technology: Fabrication effects
influence all stages
Concept Behaviour FabricationStructure Geometry
DesignRulesConcept Behaviour FabricationStructure Geometry ???
CONFIDENTIAL
Process Relations GmbH
Slide 17
The Traditional Development Cycle for MEMS Device
IDEA
DEVICE
DESIGN
EXPERIMENT
PROCESS
DESIGN
COMS2013, Enschede, The Netherlands 27.08.2013 – Dirk Ortloff
The methodological approach –
MIG TDP Template
CONFIDENTIAL
Process Relations GmbH
Slide 19
The basis for the
MIG Technology Development Process Template
CONFIDENTIAL
Process Relations GmbH
Slide 20
Principle structure MIG TDP Template
CONFIDENTIAL
Process Relations GmbH
Slide 21
MIG TDP Template -- Protocols / Roles &
Responsibilities
Category Concept Feasibility Prototype Pilot Production
Maturity Idea
Design Defined
Process Established
Design and
Process Qualified
Design Frozen
Process Validated
Design and
Process Frozen
Lead Engineer R&D
R&D /
Development
R&D /
Development
Development /
Manufacturing
Manufacturing
Layout Design Team Design Team Design Team
Process Mapping Process Team Process Team
Process
Development
Process Team Process Team Process Team
Process
Improvement
Process Team Process Team
Processing Engineers Engineers
Engineers /
Operators
Operators Operators
Experimental
Approach
Manufacturing
POC DOE
Manufacturing
POC DOE
Target specs and
tolerances DOE
Process windowing
DOE
Surface
response DOE
Quality Protocols
Safety and
Equipement
Safety and
Equipement
Add Product
Subset
Add Full Product Full
Process / Material /
Equipment Changes
Frequent
Controlled
Change
Qualification
Required
Qualification
Required
Charge
Development
Project
Development
Project
Development
Project
Lot Charge
Yielded
die / wafers
POC = Proof of Concept
Protocols / Roles and Responsibillities
CONFIDENTIAL
Process Relations GmbH
Slide 22
MIG TDP Template -- Gating Requirement
Examples
Category Concept Feasibility Prototype Pilot Production
Maturity Idea
Design Defined
Process Established
Design and
Process Qualified
Design Frozen
Process Validated
Design and
Process Frozen
Lead Engineer R&D
R&D /
Development
R&D /
Development
Development /
Manufacturing
Manufacturing
Layout Design Team Design Team Design Team
Process Mapping Process Team Process Team
Process
Development
Process Team Process Team Process Team
Process
Improvement
Process Team Process Team
Processing Engineers Engineers
Engineers /
Operators
Operators Operators
Experimental
Approach
Manufacturing
POC DOE
Manufacturing
POC DOE
Target specs and
tolerances DOE
Process windowing
DOE
Surface
response DOE
Quality Protocols
Safety and
Equipement
Safety and
Equipement
Add Product
Subset
Add Full Product Full
Process / Material /
Equipment Changes
Frequent
Controlled
Change
Qualification
Required
Qualification
Required
Charge
Development
Project
Development
Project
Development
Project
Lot Charge
Yielded
die / wafers
POC = Proof of Concept
Protocols / Roles and Responsibillities
Category Concept Feasibility Prototype Pilot Production
Design Preliminary Test Freeze Optimize Revision
Design Failure Mode
and Effect Analysis
Preliminary Finalize
Verify
with Process
Process Failure Mode
and Effect Analysis
Preliminary Finalized Adjust/ Revise
Process Flow Diagram Draft Preliminary Test Finalized Finalized
Statistical
Processing Charts
Draft
Identify and
Establish Charts
Populate/Setup
/Control
Monitor/OCAP
/Adjust
Equipment Capability Study Test Identified Validated Finalized
Process Capabilities
for critical nodes
Study Test
Meeting
physical specs
Cp > 1 Cp> 1.3
Yield Estimate Model Initial
Establish
baseline yields
Yield
improvement
Specifications Draft
Target
specifications
Establish spec/
Acceptance criteria
Specifications
in place
Specifications
in place
BOM Draft Preliminary Finalize Frozen Frozen
Inventory Control Study
Build demand
forecast
Initial Plan In place
Adjust
when required
Manufacturing
Execution System
Draft
Build demand
forecast
Build models Models in place
Modify
as necessary
Capacity/
Throughput
Study
Build demand
forecast
Establish capacity/
Identify constraints
Address
constraints
Add capacity
if required
Safety Study Identify Initiate Plan Rectify Sustain
Shipping Protocols Schedule Identify Establish In place Frozen
Training Schedule Plan Initiate
Issue
documents
Revised
documents
Pricing/Contract Development Development Development
Manufacturing
price in place
Adjust
External Vendors Establish Establish Qualify Qualified Qualified
BOM = Bill of Materials
Gating Requirments
CONFIDENTIAL
Process Relations GmbH
Slide 23
MIG TDP Template -- Expanded Design
Requirements
Category Concept Feasibility Prototype Pilot Production
Maturity Idea
Design Defined
Process Established
Design and
Process Qualified
Design Frozen
Process Validated
Design and
Process Frozen
Lead Engineer R&D
R&D /
Development
R&D /
Development
Development /
Manufacturing
Manufacturing
Layout Design Team Design Team Design Team
Process Mapping Process Team Process Team
Process
Development
Process Team Process Team Process Team
Process
Improvement
Process Team Process Team
Processing Engineers Engineers
Engineers /
Operators
Operators Operators
Experimental
Approach
Manufacturing
POC DOE
Manufacturing
POC DOE
Target specs and
tolerances DOE
Process windowing
DOE
Surface
response DOE
Quality Protocols
Safety and
Equipement
Safety and
Equipement
Add Product
Subset
Add Full Product Full
Process / Material /
Equipment Changes
Frequent
Controlled
Change
Qualification
Required
Qualification
Required
Charge
Development
Project
Development
Project
Development
Project
Lot Charge
Yielded
die / wafers
POC = Proof of Concept
Protocols / Roles and Responsibillities
Category Concept Feasibility Prototype Pilot Production
Design Preliminary Test Freeze Optimize Revision
Design Failure Mode
and Effect Analysis
Preliminary Finalize
Verify
with Process
Process Failure Mode
and Effect Analysis
Preliminary Finalized Adjust/ Revise
Process Flow Diagram Draft Preliminary Test Finalized Finalized
Statistical
Processing Charts
Draft
Identify and
Establish Charts
Populate/Setup
/Control
Monitor/OCAP
/Adjust
Equipment Capability Study Test Identified Validated Finalized
Process Capabilities
for critical nodes
Study Test
Meeting
physical specs
Cp > 1 Cp> 1.3
Yield Estimate Model Initial
Establish
baseline yields
Yield
improvement
Specifications Draft
Target
specifications
Establish spec/
Acceptance criteria
Specifications
in place
Specifications
in place
BOM Draft Preliminary Finalize Frozen Frozen
Inventory Control Study
Build demand
forecast
Initial Plan In place
Adjust
when required
Manufacturing
Execution System
Draft
Build demand
forecast
Build models Models in place
Modify
as necessary
Capacity/
Throughput
Study
Build demand
forecast
Establish capacity/
Identify constraints
Address
constraints
Add capacity
if required
Safety Study Identify Initiate Plan Rectify Sustain
Shipping Protocols Schedule Identify Establish In place Frozen
Training Schedule Plan Initiate
Issue
documents
Revised
documents
Pricing/Contract Development Development Development
Manufacturing
price in place
Adjust
External Vendors Establish Establish Qualify Qualified Qualified
BOM = Bill of Materials
Gating Requirments
Responsibility Requirement Concept Prototype Pilot
Engineer Application Review Preliminary Finalized Review
Engineer / Marketing
Review of competitive landscape.
Is it favorable?
Finalized
Engineer
Product History (new product,
derivative, cost reduction, change)
Finalized
Eng / Sales / Marketing
/ Purchaseing
Design to Cost Goals Preliminary Finalized
Adjust
Revise
Engineer
Intellectual Property /
Patent Review
Finalized Review Review
Engineer /
Patent Attorney
Intellectual Property Creation /
Patent Disclosure Submitted
Review Finalized Review
Sales / PM / Engineer
Customer Schedule /
Milestones Defined
Preliminary Finalized Review
Engineer
Detailed Review of Product
Design
Preliminary Finalized Review
Engineer
Review of analysis completed
to validate design
Preliminary Finalized Review
Engineer
Review for compliance to existing
engineering specifications
Preliminary Finalized Review
Engineer DFMEA Completion and Review Preliminary Finalized Review
Sales / PM / Engineer Customer Specification Review Preliminary Finalized
Review
Adjust
Engineer
Design and Production
Validation Test Plans
Preliminary Finalized Review
Engineer
Review of Design and Production
Validations Completed
Preliminary
Design
Finalized
Pilot
Finalize
Engineers
(design, proc and equip)
Prototype and Production Tooling
/ Equipment Strategies
Preliminary
Design
Finalized
Producti
Finalize
Design Review Gating Requirments
CONFIDENTIAL
Process Relations GmbH
Slide 24
Benefits of the usage MIG TDP Template
CONFIDENTIAL
Process Relations GmbH
Slide 25
 But Technology vs. Product
Development
COMS2013, Enschede, The Netherlands 27.08.2013 – Dirk Ortloff
The next level – CORONA
Methodology
CONFIDENTIAL
Process Relations GmbH
Slide 27
To be provoking …
CONFIDENTIAL
Process Relations GmbH
Slide 28
… with Customer Involvement
 The customer is the one who has detailed product knowledge
 Methodology must reflect customer interaction
Customer-Driven
Product
Engineering
Customer:
Define requirements and
constraints, initiate,
supervise and control
product realization
Implementation,
Verification
Development
Turns idea into technically
feasible product description
guided by customer
Manufacturing
Produce device from
product description to meet
customer needs
CONFIDENTIAL
Process Relations GmbH
Slide 29
… with Customer Involvement
 The customer is the one who has detailed product knowledge
 Methodology must reflect customer interaction
Customer-Driven
Product
Engineering
Customer:
Define requirements and
constraints, initiate,
supervise and control
product realization
Result Validation
Produce or result
assessment
“to do things right”
Implementation,
Verification
Task Definition
Product description
guided by customer control
“to do the right things”
CONFIDENTIAL
Process Relations GmbH
Slide 30
Product Engineering – Overview
Project Management
PRINCE2
Product Development
Stage Gate™
CONFIDENTIAL
Process Relations GmbH
Slide 31
Benefits from MEMS PE
 Shorter time-to-market:
 Reduced cycle time
 Fewer learning cycles
 Access to knowledge-
bases on design and
fabrication
 ICT based structure
and tools
 Improved transfer of knowledge from design to production
 Customer-lead multi-site product development
100 % product
level
time
3rd 2nd 1st cycle
MEMS PE enables reduced
development times, shorter
cycles  reduced time to market
CONFIDENTIAL
Process Relations GmbH
Slide 32
Documentation of this approach
COMS2013, Enschede, The Netherlands 27.08.2013 – Dirk Ortloff
Conclusions
CONFIDENTIAL
Process Relations GmbH
Slide 34
Collaboration between Design and Process 2.0
 Microlelectronics:
Clear separation between manufacturing and
application development
 Micro Nano Technology: „closing the
loop“
Concept Behaviour FabricationStructure Geometry
DesignRulesConcept Behaviour FabricationStructure Geometry
CONFIDENTIAL
Process Relations GmbH
Slide 35
MEMS development collaboration challenges can be
overcome by
 Putting the customer in control
 Following a customer
driven, thorough collaboration
methodology
 Adopting documented best
practices
 Pursue new approaches of data
exchange and infrastructure

Introduction to the MIG TDP template

  • 1.
    COMS2013, Enschede, TheNetherlands 27.08.2013 – Dirk Ortloff The MEMS Industry Groups Technology Development Process Template (TDP) Improving multi-site, multi-disciplinary MEMS development collaboration
  • 2.
    CONFIDENTIAL Process Relations GmbH Slide2 Negative Data Comic by: Nik Papageorgiou http://upmic.wordpress.com/
  • 3.
    CONFIDENTIAL Process Relations GmbH Slide3 Negative Data Comic by: Nik Papageorgiou http://upmic.wordpress.com/
  • 4.
    CONFIDENTIAL Process Relations GmbH Slide4 Negative Data Comic by: Nik Papageorgiou http://upmic.wordpress.com/
  • 5.
    CONFIDENTIAL Process Relations GmbH Slide5 Negative Data Comic by: Nik Papageorgiou http://upmic.wordpress.com/
  • 6.
    CONFIDENTIAL Process Relations GmbH Slide6 Why do I show this? – What are the challenges behind this?  Inappropiate data management in R&D  Inappropiate collaboration methodology
  • 7.
    CONFIDENTIAL Process Relations GmbH Slide7 Agenda  Quick company introduction  The challenges in collaborative MEMS development  The methodological approach – MIG TDP Template  The next level – CORONA Methodology  Conclusions
  • 8.
    COMS2013, Enschede, TheNetherlands 27.08.2013 – Dirk Ortloff About Process Relations GmbH
  • 9.
    CONFIDENTIAL Process Relations GmbH Slide9 Process Relations’ Mission …is to enable you to… Expedite your R&D with improved Methodology and flexible Software solutions  Next generation recipe and DoE management  Virtual manufacturing data management  Automated data collection from various sources  Experimental data management, analysis and extraction We deliver the easy to use, unique, world class Process Development Execution System (PDES) and consulting services.
  • 10.
    CONFIDENTIAL Process Relations GmbH Slide10 PDES Coverage of other Manufacturing Solutions Business SystemsERP Enterprise IT SW Infrastructure CRMMDM Inbound Supply Chain Systems SCP etc. etc. Operations Management Systeme PDES MES EMS LIMS Operations IT SW Infrastructure Design & Engineering Systems Control and Automation Systems RTD AmHS / MCS SPC APC Manufacturing Tools EI RMS QMS Shipping Outbound Systems TMS etc. SRM Doc- Mgt PLM DwH etc. Doc- Mgt
  • 11.
    COMS2013, Enschede, TheNetherlands 27.08.2013 – Dirk Ortloff The challenges in collaborative MEMS development
  • 12.
    CONFIDENTIAL Process Relations GmbH Slide12 The challenges  25% development projects reach the market  of those 66% fail their original expectations  20% of projects take too long and miss their market window  35% of companies experience runaway projects  40% of R&D experiments are repeated Source: IDC “Accelerating Science-Led Innovation for Competitive Advantage” Feb. 2012
  • 13.
    CONFIDENTIAL Process Relations GmbH Slide13 Difficulties in collaborative MEMS development  Wealth of information / technologies / data / …  Diverse Variances, Options and Variability  Multi-disciplinary teams required  Collaboration along the value chain
  • 14.
    CONFIDENTIAL Process Relations GmbH Slide14 Collaboration challenges  MEMS Development Phases must include Foundry at early stages with multi-disciplinary team  Design Review must be done for a transfer from R&D Lab to High Volume Manufacturing  … 14 Fabless Houses Design Houses Design Centres MEMS Process Development Specialists Assembly & Test Houses (Wafer) Foundry Services, Semiconductor Contract Munufacturer (SCM) Integrated Semiconductor(Device Manufacturer (ISM/IDM) Distributors, Fabless Houses, Wholesalers, Trading Companies
  • 15.
    CONFIDENTIAL Process Relations GmbH Slide15 Difficulties in collaborative MEMS development  Question: How to manage for fast time to market?
  • 16.
    CONFIDENTIAL Process Relations GmbH Slide16 Historical Collaboration between Design and Process  Microlelectronics: Clear separation between manufacturing and application development  Micro Nano Technology: Fabrication effects influence all stages Concept Behaviour FabricationStructure Geometry DesignRulesConcept Behaviour FabricationStructure Geometry ???
  • 17.
    CONFIDENTIAL Process Relations GmbH Slide17 The Traditional Development Cycle for MEMS Device IDEA DEVICE DESIGN EXPERIMENT PROCESS DESIGN
  • 18.
    COMS2013, Enschede, TheNetherlands 27.08.2013 – Dirk Ortloff The methodological approach – MIG TDP Template
  • 19.
    CONFIDENTIAL Process Relations GmbH Slide19 The basis for the MIG Technology Development Process Template
  • 20.
    CONFIDENTIAL Process Relations GmbH Slide20 Principle structure MIG TDP Template
  • 21.
    CONFIDENTIAL Process Relations GmbH Slide21 MIG TDP Template -- Protocols / Roles & Responsibilities Category Concept Feasibility Prototype Pilot Production Maturity Idea Design Defined Process Established Design and Process Qualified Design Frozen Process Validated Design and Process Frozen Lead Engineer R&D R&D / Development R&D / Development Development / Manufacturing Manufacturing Layout Design Team Design Team Design Team Process Mapping Process Team Process Team Process Development Process Team Process Team Process Team Process Improvement Process Team Process Team Processing Engineers Engineers Engineers / Operators Operators Operators Experimental Approach Manufacturing POC DOE Manufacturing POC DOE Target specs and tolerances DOE Process windowing DOE Surface response DOE Quality Protocols Safety and Equipement Safety and Equipement Add Product Subset Add Full Product Full Process / Material / Equipment Changes Frequent Controlled Change Qualification Required Qualification Required Charge Development Project Development Project Development Project Lot Charge Yielded die / wafers POC = Proof of Concept Protocols / Roles and Responsibillities
  • 22.
    CONFIDENTIAL Process Relations GmbH Slide22 MIG TDP Template -- Gating Requirement Examples Category Concept Feasibility Prototype Pilot Production Maturity Idea Design Defined Process Established Design and Process Qualified Design Frozen Process Validated Design and Process Frozen Lead Engineer R&D R&D / Development R&D / Development Development / Manufacturing Manufacturing Layout Design Team Design Team Design Team Process Mapping Process Team Process Team Process Development Process Team Process Team Process Team Process Improvement Process Team Process Team Processing Engineers Engineers Engineers / Operators Operators Operators Experimental Approach Manufacturing POC DOE Manufacturing POC DOE Target specs and tolerances DOE Process windowing DOE Surface response DOE Quality Protocols Safety and Equipement Safety and Equipement Add Product Subset Add Full Product Full Process / Material / Equipment Changes Frequent Controlled Change Qualification Required Qualification Required Charge Development Project Development Project Development Project Lot Charge Yielded die / wafers POC = Proof of Concept Protocols / Roles and Responsibillities Category Concept Feasibility Prototype Pilot Production Design Preliminary Test Freeze Optimize Revision Design Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Preliminary Finalize Verify with Process Process Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Preliminary Finalized Adjust/ Revise Process Flow Diagram Draft Preliminary Test Finalized Finalized Statistical Processing Charts Draft Identify and Establish Charts Populate/Setup /Control Monitor/OCAP /Adjust Equipment Capability Study Test Identified Validated Finalized Process Capabilities for critical nodes Study Test Meeting physical specs Cp > 1 Cp> 1.3 Yield Estimate Model Initial Establish baseline yields Yield improvement Specifications Draft Target specifications Establish spec/ Acceptance criteria Specifications in place Specifications in place BOM Draft Preliminary Finalize Frozen Frozen Inventory Control Study Build demand forecast Initial Plan In place Adjust when required Manufacturing Execution System Draft Build demand forecast Build models Models in place Modify as necessary Capacity/ Throughput Study Build demand forecast Establish capacity/ Identify constraints Address constraints Add capacity if required Safety Study Identify Initiate Plan Rectify Sustain Shipping Protocols Schedule Identify Establish In place Frozen Training Schedule Plan Initiate Issue documents Revised documents Pricing/Contract Development Development Development Manufacturing price in place Adjust External Vendors Establish Establish Qualify Qualified Qualified BOM = Bill of Materials Gating Requirments
  • 23.
    CONFIDENTIAL Process Relations GmbH Slide23 MIG TDP Template -- Expanded Design Requirements Category Concept Feasibility Prototype Pilot Production Maturity Idea Design Defined Process Established Design and Process Qualified Design Frozen Process Validated Design and Process Frozen Lead Engineer R&D R&D / Development R&D / Development Development / Manufacturing Manufacturing Layout Design Team Design Team Design Team Process Mapping Process Team Process Team Process Development Process Team Process Team Process Team Process Improvement Process Team Process Team Processing Engineers Engineers Engineers / Operators Operators Operators Experimental Approach Manufacturing POC DOE Manufacturing POC DOE Target specs and tolerances DOE Process windowing DOE Surface response DOE Quality Protocols Safety and Equipement Safety and Equipement Add Product Subset Add Full Product Full Process / Material / Equipment Changes Frequent Controlled Change Qualification Required Qualification Required Charge Development Project Development Project Development Project Lot Charge Yielded die / wafers POC = Proof of Concept Protocols / Roles and Responsibillities Category Concept Feasibility Prototype Pilot Production Design Preliminary Test Freeze Optimize Revision Design Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Preliminary Finalize Verify with Process Process Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Preliminary Finalized Adjust/ Revise Process Flow Diagram Draft Preliminary Test Finalized Finalized Statistical Processing Charts Draft Identify and Establish Charts Populate/Setup /Control Monitor/OCAP /Adjust Equipment Capability Study Test Identified Validated Finalized Process Capabilities for critical nodes Study Test Meeting physical specs Cp > 1 Cp> 1.3 Yield Estimate Model Initial Establish baseline yields Yield improvement Specifications Draft Target specifications Establish spec/ Acceptance criteria Specifications in place Specifications in place BOM Draft Preliminary Finalize Frozen Frozen Inventory Control Study Build demand forecast Initial Plan In place Adjust when required Manufacturing Execution System Draft Build demand forecast Build models Models in place Modify as necessary Capacity/ Throughput Study Build demand forecast Establish capacity/ Identify constraints Address constraints Add capacity if required Safety Study Identify Initiate Plan Rectify Sustain Shipping Protocols Schedule Identify Establish In place Frozen Training Schedule Plan Initiate Issue documents Revised documents Pricing/Contract Development Development Development Manufacturing price in place Adjust External Vendors Establish Establish Qualify Qualified Qualified BOM = Bill of Materials Gating Requirments Responsibility Requirement Concept Prototype Pilot Engineer Application Review Preliminary Finalized Review Engineer / Marketing Review of competitive landscape. Is it favorable? Finalized Engineer Product History (new product, derivative, cost reduction, change) Finalized Eng / Sales / Marketing / Purchaseing Design to Cost Goals Preliminary Finalized Adjust Revise Engineer Intellectual Property / Patent Review Finalized Review Review Engineer / Patent Attorney Intellectual Property Creation / Patent Disclosure Submitted Review Finalized Review Sales / PM / Engineer Customer Schedule / Milestones Defined Preliminary Finalized Review Engineer Detailed Review of Product Design Preliminary Finalized Review Engineer Review of analysis completed to validate design Preliminary Finalized Review Engineer Review for compliance to existing engineering specifications Preliminary Finalized Review Engineer DFMEA Completion and Review Preliminary Finalized Review Sales / PM / Engineer Customer Specification Review Preliminary Finalized Review Adjust Engineer Design and Production Validation Test Plans Preliminary Finalized Review Engineer Review of Design and Production Validations Completed Preliminary Design Finalized Pilot Finalize Engineers (design, proc and equip) Prototype and Production Tooling / Equipment Strategies Preliminary Design Finalized Producti Finalize Design Review Gating Requirments
  • 24.
    CONFIDENTIAL Process Relations GmbH Slide24 Benefits of the usage MIG TDP Template
  • 25.
    CONFIDENTIAL Process Relations GmbH Slide25  But Technology vs. Product Development
  • 26.
    COMS2013, Enschede, TheNetherlands 27.08.2013 – Dirk Ortloff The next level – CORONA Methodology
  • 27.
  • 28.
    CONFIDENTIAL Process Relations GmbH Slide28 … with Customer Involvement  The customer is the one who has detailed product knowledge  Methodology must reflect customer interaction Customer-Driven Product Engineering Customer: Define requirements and constraints, initiate, supervise and control product realization Implementation, Verification Development Turns idea into technically feasible product description guided by customer Manufacturing Produce device from product description to meet customer needs
  • 29.
    CONFIDENTIAL Process Relations GmbH Slide29 … with Customer Involvement  The customer is the one who has detailed product knowledge  Methodology must reflect customer interaction Customer-Driven Product Engineering Customer: Define requirements and constraints, initiate, supervise and control product realization Result Validation Produce or result assessment “to do things right” Implementation, Verification Task Definition Product description guided by customer control “to do the right things”
  • 30.
    CONFIDENTIAL Process Relations GmbH Slide30 Product Engineering – Overview Project Management PRINCE2 Product Development Stage Gate™
  • 31.
    CONFIDENTIAL Process Relations GmbH Slide31 Benefits from MEMS PE  Shorter time-to-market:  Reduced cycle time  Fewer learning cycles  Access to knowledge- bases on design and fabrication  ICT based structure and tools  Improved transfer of knowledge from design to production  Customer-lead multi-site product development 100 % product level time 3rd 2nd 1st cycle MEMS PE enables reduced development times, shorter cycles  reduced time to market
  • 32.
    CONFIDENTIAL Process Relations GmbH Slide32 Documentation of this approach
  • 33.
    COMS2013, Enschede, TheNetherlands 27.08.2013 – Dirk Ortloff Conclusions
  • 34.
    CONFIDENTIAL Process Relations GmbH Slide34 Collaboration between Design and Process 2.0  Microlelectronics: Clear separation between manufacturing and application development  Micro Nano Technology: „closing the loop“ Concept Behaviour FabricationStructure Geometry DesignRulesConcept Behaviour FabricationStructure Geometry
  • 35.
    CONFIDENTIAL Process Relations GmbH Slide35 MEMS development collaboration challenges can be overcome by  Putting the customer in control  Following a customer driven, thorough collaboration methodology  Adopting documented best practices  Pursue new approaches of data exchange and infrastructure