Easing the Secondary Production Process During the Design Stage
Maria Pettersson, Ph.D., Orthopedic Industry Specialist for GE Additive, will explain why the
design stage is where the smart decisions are made in additive manufacturing — not only on
ways to increase clinical outcomes and additive processes, but also to ease post-processing.
In these areas, the process can be made efficient and cost-effective. Dr. Pettersson will offer
tips and tricks on orientation, supports, stock material and design features.
Easing the Secondary Production
Process During the Design Stage
Maria Pettersson, Ph.D., Orthopedic Industry Specialist, GE Additive
OMTEC, 13th of June, 2018
Not cleared or approved by the FDA.
Complex is Easy
Not cleared or approved by the FDA.
Part design and build planning
Orientation
Not cleared or approved by the FDA.
Porous structures
Features
Not cleared or approved by the FDA.
Supports
Not cleared or approved by the FDA.
Involve the whole manufacturing chain
Machining
Not cleared or approved by the FDA.
Inspection
Not cleared or approved by the FDA.
Finishing
Not cleared or approved by the FDA.
Batch handling
Not cleared or approved by the FDA.
Imagination at work
This presentation may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this document is strictly forbidden.
Enhancing Design Through Engineering &
Manufacturing Collaboration
Laura Gilmour
Global Medical Business Development
OMTEC
Chicago June 12-14
EOS | 2
Medical Field: Early Adopters of AM Present:
 Hearing aids
 Dental applications
 Porous acetabular cups
2-5 years:
 Hip & knee replacements
 Other common internal and external medical
devices (e.g. instruments)
> 5-10 years:
 Bioprinting of living tissue for human transplant
 Bioprinting for life sciences R&D
Source: http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/3117917 and http://3dprintingindustry.com/2015/08/28/gartner-predicts-medical-3d-printing-to-become-mainstream-in-2-5-years/
EOS | 3
50% Expect >10% Increase in Medical AM Applications
SME Medical AM3DP Annual Report, April 2018
EOS | 4
FDA Data on Additive Manufactured Medical
Devices
Medical Devices cleared as of Mid-2014a Breakdown by Device Typea
Over 68% falling in the Division of Orthopedic Devices
As of December 2017, over 100 FDA Cleared Additively Manufactured Productsb
Source: aRicles et. al. RAPID May 2014; b“FDA Makes Statement Concerning the Future of 3D Printing in Medicine”, 3D Printing Industry, December 5, 2017
EOS | 5
EOS | 6
Silo Experience
R&D
R&D
MD
KOLKOL
PD
PM
EOS | 7
Silo Experience
R&D
R&D
MD
KOLKOL
PD
PM
Metallurgy
Innovative Shapes
Exposure
and Process
Post-
Treatments
Manufacturing
© Stefan Bindl
Machining
Supports &
Orientation
Design for
Additive Manufacturing
is about…
EOS | 8
Important to Establish Whole Process Chain
Source: EOS, Instrumentaria
Digital Design
 CT/MRI based design
 Optimization of part
design
 Use of design software
to generate e.g. lattice
structures
Data processing
Optimization with regard to
 Part orientation
 Placement
 Usage of build area
 Support structures
 Layout
Build process
 Identification of critical
parameters for
application goal
 Parameter optimization
 Material characteristics
Post processing
 Heat treatment
 Post-machining
 Polishing
 Cleaning
DESIGN BUILD FINISH
EOS | 9
Important to Establish Whole Process Chain
Source: EOS, Instrumentaria
Digital Design
 CT/MRI based design
 Optimization of part
design
 Use of design software
to generate e.g. lattice
structures
Data processing
Optimization with regard to
 Part orientation
 Placement
 Usage of build area
 Support structures
 Layout
Build process
 Identification of critical
parameters for
application goal
 Parameter optimization
 Material characteristics
Post processing
 Heat treatment
 Post-machining
 Polishing
 Cleaning
DESIGN BUILD FINISH
EOS | 10
Leveraging CM Experience in Design Phases for AM
EOS | 11
Risks of Implementing AM in Silo Environment
Competitor innovates before you
Redesign needed; adds to launch timeline
CM & OEM expectations not aligned
Device not economically buildable
EOS | 12
EOS-Design Process
© EOS GmbH
1
Clarify
Challenge
Create
Concepts
Define
Orientation
Define
Design
Build final
job
Evaluation
Test
job
Test
job
Test
job
EOS | 13
Process Application Sprint/Redesign of Application
Clarify challenge
Define main functions
Theoretical Evaluation
Define final orientation
Define redesign
approach for each
function
Final Design
(+ Parameters)
Test for
function 1
No Test for
function 2
Test for
function 3
N-Tests for n-
functions
Evaluation of each test
Yes
Test part building
optional
No
Can a decision be
made for design ?
Test for
design 1
Test for
design 2
Test for
design 3
N-Tests for n-
designs
Post processing
optional
Generate Concepts
Define main goals
Support Structures
+ pre processing
Evaluation of each test
Can a decision be
made for orientation ?
Yes
Using methodic
product development and design
Evaluation
EOS | 14
Process Application Sprint/Redesign of Application
Clarify challenge
Define main functions
Theoretical Evaluation
Define final orientation
Define redesign
approach for each
function
Final Design
(+ Parameters)
Test for
function 1
No Test for
function 2
Test for
function 3
N-Tests for n-
functions
Evaluation of each test
Yes
Test part building
optional
No
Can a decision be
made for design ?
Test for
design 1
Test for
design 2
Test for
design 3
N-Tests for n-
designs
Post processing
optional
Generate Concepts
Define main goals
Support Structures
+ pre processing
Evaluation of each test
Can a decision be
made for orientation ?
Yes
Using methodic
product development and design
Evaluation
EOS | 15
Process Application Sprint/Redesign of Application
Clarify challenge
Define main functions
Theoretical Evaluation
Define final orientation
Define redesign
approach for each
function
Final Design
(+ Parameters)
Test for
function 1
No Test for
function 2
Test for
function 3
N-Tests for n-
functions
Evaluation of each test
Yes
Test part building
optional
No
Can a decision be
made for design ?
Test for
design 1
Test for
design 2
Test for
design 3
N-Tests for n-
designs
Post processing
optional
Generate Concepts
Define main goals
Support Structures
+ pre processing
Evaluation of each test
Can a decision be
made for orientation ?
Yes
Using methodic
product development and design
Evaluation
EOS | 16
Process Application Sprint/Redesign of Application
Clarify challenge
Define main functions
Theoretical Evaluation
Define final orientation
Define redesign
approach for each
function
Final Design
(+ Parameters)
Test for
function 1
No Test for
function 2
Test for
function 3
N-Tests for n-
functions
Evaluation of each test
Yes
Test part building
optional
No
Can a decision be
made for design ?
Test for
design 1
Test for
design 2
Test for
design 3
N-Tests for n-
designs
Post processing
optional
Generate Concepts
Define main goals
Support Structures
+ pre processing
Evaluation of each test
Can a decision be
made for orientation ?
Yes
Using methodic
product development and design
Evaluation
EOS | 17
Collaboration
“Additive Minds is an applied
engineering consulting team;
designed to help your
organization transform from
prototyping to production with
additive manufacturing.”
EOS | 18
Device OEM
Contract
Manufacturer
Successful
Product
Innovation
Affects
Collaboration
EOS | 20
Shaping the Future of Manufacturing
Additive Manufacturing - Design Considerations Rapid Fire - OMTEC 2018

Additive Manufacturing - Design Considerations Rapid Fire - OMTEC 2018

  • 2.
    Easing the SecondaryProduction Process During the Design Stage Maria Pettersson, Ph.D., Orthopedic Industry Specialist for GE Additive, will explain why the design stage is where the smart decisions are made in additive manufacturing — not only on ways to increase clinical outcomes and additive processes, but also to ease post-processing. In these areas, the process can be made efficient and cost-effective. Dr. Pettersson will offer tips and tricks on orientation, supports, stock material and design features.
  • 3.
    Easing the SecondaryProduction Process During the Design Stage Maria Pettersson, Ph.D., Orthopedic Industry Specialist, GE Additive OMTEC, 13th of June, 2018
  • 5.
    Not cleared orapproved by the FDA.
  • 6.
    Complex is Easy Notcleared or approved by the FDA.
  • 7.
    Part design andbuild planning
  • 8.
    Orientation Not cleared orapproved by the FDA.
  • 9.
  • 10.
    Features Not cleared orapproved by the FDA.
  • 11.
    Supports Not cleared orapproved by the FDA.
  • 12.
    Involve the wholemanufacturing chain
  • 13.
    Machining Not cleared orapproved by the FDA.
  • 14.
    Inspection Not cleared orapproved by the FDA.
  • 15.
    Finishing Not cleared orapproved by the FDA.
  • 16.
    Batch handling Not clearedor approved by the FDA.
  • 17.
  • 19.
    This presentation maycontain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this document is strictly forbidden. Enhancing Design Through Engineering & Manufacturing Collaboration Laura Gilmour Global Medical Business Development OMTEC Chicago June 12-14
  • 20.
    EOS | 2 MedicalField: Early Adopters of AM Present:  Hearing aids  Dental applications  Porous acetabular cups 2-5 years:  Hip & knee replacements  Other common internal and external medical devices (e.g. instruments) > 5-10 years:  Bioprinting of living tissue for human transplant  Bioprinting for life sciences R&D Source: http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/3117917 and http://3dprintingindustry.com/2015/08/28/gartner-predicts-medical-3d-printing-to-become-mainstream-in-2-5-years/
  • 21.
    EOS | 3 50%Expect >10% Increase in Medical AM Applications SME Medical AM3DP Annual Report, April 2018
  • 22.
    EOS | 4 FDAData on Additive Manufactured Medical Devices Medical Devices cleared as of Mid-2014a Breakdown by Device Typea Over 68% falling in the Division of Orthopedic Devices As of December 2017, over 100 FDA Cleared Additively Manufactured Productsb Source: aRicles et. al. RAPID May 2014; b“FDA Makes Statement Concerning the Future of 3D Printing in Medicine”, 3D Printing Industry, December 5, 2017
  • 23.
  • 24.
    EOS | 6 SiloExperience R&D R&D MD KOLKOL PD PM
  • 25.
    EOS | 7 SiloExperience R&D R&D MD KOLKOL PD PM Metallurgy Innovative Shapes Exposure and Process Post- Treatments Manufacturing © Stefan Bindl Machining Supports & Orientation Design for Additive Manufacturing is about…
  • 26.
    EOS | 8 Importantto Establish Whole Process Chain Source: EOS, Instrumentaria Digital Design  CT/MRI based design  Optimization of part design  Use of design software to generate e.g. lattice structures Data processing Optimization with regard to  Part orientation  Placement  Usage of build area  Support structures  Layout Build process  Identification of critical parameters for application goal  Parameter optimization  Material characteristics Post processing  Heat treatment  Post-machining  Polishing  Cleaning DESIGN BUILD FINISH
  • 27.
    EOS | 9 Importantto Establish Whole Process Chain Source: EOS, Instrumentaria Digital Design  CT/MRI based design  Optimization of part design  Use of design software to generate e.g. lattice structures Data processing Optimization with regard to  Part orientation  Placement  Usage of build area  Support structures  Layout Build process  Identification of critical parameters for application goal  Parameter optimization  Material characteristics Post processing  Heat treatment  Post-machining  Polishing  Cleaning DESIGN BUILD FINISH
  • 28.
    EOS | 10 LeveragingCM Experience in Design Phases for AM
  • 29.
    EOS | 11 Risksof Implementing AM in Silo Environment Competitor innovates before you Redesign needed; adds to launch timeline CM & OEM expectations not aligned Device not economically buildable
  • 30.
    EOS | 12 EOS-DesignProcess © EOS GmbH 1 Clarify Challenge Create Concepts Define Orientation Define Design Build final job Evaluation Test job Test job Test job
  • 31.
    EOS | 13 ProcessApplication Sprint/Redesign of Application Clarify challenge Define main functions Theoretical Evaluation Define final orientation Define redesign approach for each function Final Design (+ Parameters) Test for function 1 No Test for function 2 Test for function 3 N-Tests for n- functions Evaluation of each test Yes Test part building optional No Can a decision be made for design ? Test for design 1 Test for design 2 Test for design 3 N-Tests for n- designs Post processing optional Generate Concepts Define main goals Support Structures + pre processing Evaluation of each test Can a decision be made for orientation ? Yes Using methodic product development and design Evaluation
  • 32.
    EOS | 14 ProcessApplication Sprint/Redesign of Application Clarify challenge Define main functions Theoretical Evaluation Define final orientation Define redesign approach for each function Final Design (+ Parameters) Test for function 1 No Test for function 2 Test for function 3 N-Tests for n- functions Evaluation of each test Yes Test part building optional No Can a decision be made for design ? Test for design 1 Test for design 2 Test for design 3 N-Tests for n- designs Post processing optional Generate Concepts Define main goals Support Structures + pre processing Evaluation of each test Can a decision be made for orientation ? Yes Using methodic product development and design Evaluation
  • 33.
    EOS | 15 ProcessApplication Sprint/Redesign of Application Clarify challenge Define main functions Theoretical Evaluation Define final orientation Define redesign approach for each function Final Design (+ Parameters) Test for function 1 No Test for function 2 Test for function 3 N-Tests for n- functions Evaluation of each test Yes Test part building optional No Can a decision be made for design ? Test for design 1 Test for design 2 Test for design 3 N-Tests for n- designs Post processing optional Generate Concepts Define main goals Support Structures + pre processing Evaluation of each test Can a decision be made for orientation ? Yes Using methodic product development and design Evaluation
  • 34.
    EOS | 16 ProcessApplication Sprint/Redesign of Application Clarify challenge Define main functions Theoretical Evaluation Define final orientation Define redesign approach for each function Final Design (+ Parameters) Test for function 1 No Test for function 2 Test for function 3 N-Tests for n- functions Evaluation of each test Yes Test part building optional No Can a decision be made for design ? Test for design 1 Test for design 2 Test for design 3 N-Tests for n- designs Post processing optional Generate Concepts Define main goals Support Structures + pre processing Evaluation of each test Can a decision be made for orientation ? Yes Using methodic product development and design Evaluation
  • 35.
    EOS | 17 Collaboration “AdditiveMinds is an applied engineering consulting team; designed to help your organization transform from prototyping to production with additive manufacturing.”
  • 36.
    EOS | 18 DeviceOEM Contract Manufacturer Successful Product Innovation Affects Collaboration
  • 37.
    EOS | 20 Shapingthe Future of Manufacturing