Media Evaluation - Question Three
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
0 likes•145 views
The document discusses feedback received from audiences on the creator's short film, poster, and review. For the short film, most respondents felt it conformed to conventions of the genre, though opinions were mixed on how well it matched supernatural/horror. Feedback on the poster suggested adding more information and blending background images better. Feedback on the review was positive overall, though one comment noted the review columns were different widths, which could be improved.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Evaluation question 3
The student gathered feedback from their primary audience (classmates) throughout the process of creating their short film. They would ask classmates to watch iterations of the film and provide input on how it could be improved. Based on this feedback, the student would make changes like altering sound effects or re-shooting scenes. Gathering frequent feedback in this way allowed the student to continuously improve the film. The student found it more difficult to get feedback and make changes based on input from their secondary audience on YouTube. Overall, the frequent feedback from the primary audience helped the student create a film that better met those viewers' preferences.
Evaluation question 3
The document discusses feedback received on various promotional materials created by the author. For a poster, feedback indicated that more institutional information was needed, which the author addressed. Feedback on a magazine confirmed that conventions had been followed. Feedback on a trailer identified issues with text fonts and shot ordering, which the author used to improve clarity and understandability. In all cases, the author found the audience feedback helpful to strengthen the promotional materials.
Evaluation question_4
The document discusses gathering feedback on a TV advertisement from various sources like YouTube, focus groups, and individual reviews. The feedback was mostly positive, praising the editing, song choice, and narrative. However, some constructive criticism noted that some scenes were too "jumpy" and could have benefited from more varied shots. Reflecting on the overall feedback, the author was proud of the ad but recognized the value of the criticisms for improving future work.
What have you learned from your audience feedback?
The document summarizes audience feedback received for a music video project. It discusses two rounds of feedback: 1) Interviews with 3 people that identified needed changes like improving lighting. 2) An online survey of a wider audience through social media that asked 9 questions to further improve the video. The feedback helped identify strengths like good narrative and weaknesses like quality that could be improved. Overall, the document emphasizes how audience feedback is vital to improving a product to better meet target audiences' needs.
Evaluation question 3
The student received feedback on a music video and tasks they completed. They learned that using varied camera shots and angles made the video more professional. Lip syncing could have been improved with more time spent on it. Changing locations occasionally would have prevented repetitiveness. Overall, the feedback was positive and provided constructive criticism to further improve video quality and attention to detail.
Audience Feedback Charts And Graphs
I have created graphs and charts to summarize feedback from questionnaires about a video and related products. The charts compare responses on a scale of 1 to 10 for how good the video was, questions about the creative camera style, and which product best promoted the artist.
Evaluation question 3
The document discusses getting audience feedback at various stages of a film marketing project. Feedback was obtained through question sheets after a pitch presentation to gauge understanding of the film idea. A rough cut screening collected feedback on likes, dislikes, and suggestions for improvement, which resulted in changes to sound quality. Further feedback was gathered from poster, magazine cover, and final screening previews. Final feedback came from YouTube comments on the finished teaser trailer, allowing assessment of the marketing campaign's success.
Feedback summary
The document summarizes feedback from the target audience on a student's horror film promotional products. The student learned that their film trailer and poster were appealing and conventional but the magazine cover was bland. Strengths included meeting genre/form conventions and professional quality, while weaknesses included the magazine cover design and potential improvements to the trailer. Audience feedback confirmed the products effectively appealed to the target group and suggested minor changes like improving main images and characters on the poster as well as magazine typography. The student concluded audience feedback is valuable for improving popularity by determining appeal and identifying specific areas for enhancement.
Recommended
Evaluation question 3
The student gathered feedback from their primary audience (classmates) throughout the process of creating their short film. They would ask classmates to watch iterations of the film and provide input on how it could be improved. Based on this feedback, the student would make changes like altering sound effects or re-shooting scenes. Gathering frequent feedback in this way allowed the student to continuously improve the film. The student found it more difficult to get feedback and make changes based on input from their secondary audience on YouTube. Overall, the frequent feedback from the primary audience helped the student create a film that better met those viewers' preferences.
Evaluation question 3
The document discusses feedback received on various promotional materials created by the author. For a poster, feedback indicated that more institutional information was needed, which the author addressed. Feedback on a magazine confirmed that conventions had been followed. Feedback on a trailer identified issues with text fonts and shot ordering, which the author used to improve clarity and understandability. In all cases, the author found the audience feedback helpful to strengthen the promotional materials.
Evaluation question_4
The document discusses gathering feedback on a TV advertisement from various sources like YouTube, focus groups, and individual reviews. The feedback was mostly positive, praising the editing, song choice, and narrative. However, some constructive criticism noted that some scenes were too "jumpy" and could have benefited from more varied shots. Reflecting on the overall feedback, the author was proud of the ad but recognized the value of the criticisms for improving future work.
What have you learned from your audience feedback?
The document summarizes audience feedback received for a music video project. It discusses two rounds of feedback: 1) Interviews with 3 people that identified needed changes like improving lighting. 2) An online survey of a wider audience through social media that asked 9 questions to further improve the video. The feedback helped identify strengths like good narrative and weaknesses like quality that could be improved. Overall, the document emphasizes how audience feedback is vital to improving a product to better meet target audiences' needs.
Evaluation question 3
The student received feedback on a music video and tasks they completed. They learned that using varied camera shots and angles made the video more professional. Lip syncing could have been improved with more time spent on it. Changing locations occasionally would have prevented repetitiveness. Overall, the feedback was positive and provided constructive criticism to further improve video quality and attention to detail.
Audience Feedback Charts And Graphs
I have created graphs and charts to summarize feedback from questionnaires about a video and related products. The charts compare responses on a scale of 1 to 10 for how good the video was, questions about the creative camera style, and which product best promoted the artist.
Evaluation question 3
The document discusses getting audience feedback at various stages of a film marketing project. Feedback was obtained through question sheets after a pitch presentation to gauge understanding of the film idea. A rough cut screening collected feedback on likes, dislikes, and suggestions for improvement, which resulted in changes to sound quality. Further feedback was gathered from poster, magazine cover, and final screening previews. Final feedback came from YouTube comments on the finished teaser trailer, allowing assessment of the marketing campaign's success.
Feedback summary
The document summarizes feedback from the target audience on a student's horror film promotional products. The student learned that their film trailer and poster were appealing and conventional but the magazine cover was bland. Strengths included meeting genre/form conventions and professional quality, while weaknesses included the magazine cover design and potential improvements to the trailer. Audience feedback confirmed the products effectively appealed to the target group and suggested minor changes like improving main images and characters on the poster as well as magazine typography. The student concluded audience feedback is valuable for improving popularity by determining appeal and identifying specific areas for enhancement.
Q3
The document summarizes what the author has learned from audience feedback on their media production work. They conducted early primary research using surveys to understand their target audience and presented feedback to their class. The author realized the importance of meeting audience expectations shaped by their exposure to other media. Feedback helped the author conform to conventions and tweak issues in their trailer. The feedback process highlighted key aspects like lighting, sound, and location to improve for future planning.
Evaluation question 3
The student gathered feedback from other classes and their own class on their music video and web pop-up advertisements. Most people felt the ads suited their intended audiences and effectively showed the product. Some comments suggested adding more locations or props to future ads. However, most feedback was positive, praising the exact lip syncing and good song choices. For the radio ad, listeners commented that the accent made it seem professional and the script was well-written and delivered. A challenge was that the student's survey tool failed to properly analyze the results.
Questionnaire results
The document summarizes the results of a questionnaire given to 10 people about Ryan Talmage's film trailer, poster, and magazine cover for a post-apocalyptic horror project. Most respondents felt the trailer effectively conveyed the genre conventions. The magazine cover was also seen as professional and fitting conventions well, though some improvements were suggested for layout and images. The film poster was found to be more mixed, with conventions portrayed effectively but some elements like colors and layout seen as needing improvement. Overall, the production was deemed a success at conveying the genre through technical elements and conventions, with only minor revisions suggested. All agreed Ryan created a clear brand identity.
Audience feedback
The filmmakers asked for feedback on their music video from social media and classmates to improve it. Most useful was feedback on Facebook that some shots were too long, so they added quick flashback shots to break up longer scenes. Classmates also noted some edits were poorly timed, which they fixed by tightening up parts of the footage.
Audience Feedback
The document discusses audience feedback the creator received on a music video production project. They created a questionnaire to gather feedback from a test audience of 10 people on the quality and suitability of the video and print products. Additional feedback was collected from social media sites like YouTube and Facebook. The feedback indicated that the audience found the video and branding successful overall, with fast editing reflecting the genre. Minor criticisms included some interior shots not fitting as well. The creator learned their target audience engaged positively with the work and branding was cohesive, while some shots could potentially be improved.
Audience theory
The student created a Facebook group to get feedback on a final music video project. They asked questions about how well the video met conventions of a pop music video genre, drew attention to its unusual concept, editing quality, and overall success. The most useful feedback noted that while the conceptual idea was original, not having a main character made it harder to relate to. Another comment said the timing of screen shots could be slightly improved. Positive feedback confirmed the video went against stereotypical pop video norms. This variety of feedback helped the student critically analyze responses and identify areas for improvement like practicing software skills more, establishing a main character, using a wider range of effects, and including fading shots and a broader image range.
Evaluation question 3 ppt
The document discusses audience feedback received for the film Tabula. It asked questions about first impressions, favorite parts, and areas for improvement. Audience members said they enjoyed the scary ending the most. Feedback indicated acting could be improved. Based on comments, the filmmakers shortened and improved acting for the final cut. Gathering feedback was limited by availability and recording equipment. Improving the setting and equipment for future feedback would make the process more professional. Audience testing is important for filmmakers to identify issues, make changes, and create the best possible final product.
Page layout t5 pro forma (2)
The document discusses different methods for sourcing images and processing images. It outlines the advantages and disadvantages of sourcing images from books, Google Images, stock image libraries, copyright free sites, and one's own existing images. It also discusses cropping, scaling, adjusting resolution, and manipulating images. The key points are that each source has benefits like quality, variety, and cost but also limitations regarding specificity, copyright issues, or lack of options. Processing images allows changing aspects like size and detail for different uses but can reduce versatility.
Question 3
We received limited feedback initially from our audience questionnaire, so we sent out emails and social media posts to get more feedback. The additional feedback we received provided constructive criticism and ideas on how to improve our product, such as opinions on our video's narrative, camera work, and representation of the song, as well as strengths and weaknesses of our digipak design and whether it fit the video's theme. Respondents also shared their honest opinion on our advert and how it could be improved to better fit the themes of the video and digipak.
7. factual evaluation(2)
The document summarizes the research, planning, production, and evaluation of a video project about autism. It discusses the strengths and weaknesses of each stage, and how improvements could have been made. Peer feedback praised the topic and visual elements, but suggested improving audio editing. The creator agrees audio could be enhanced and would make changes based on the feedback.
Evaluation Question 3
Through multiple iterations incorporating audience feedback, the filmmaker completely changed their film idea from "passing down the mantle" to something more action-packed. Feedback on early drafts noted that the story was sometimes disconnected and should have a moral. Later screenings with dialogue incorporated based on feedback helped clear up audience uncertainties. Feedback on animations was also useful, noting natural movement but broken character models at times. The filmmaker concluded that audience feedback was vital to developing professional and coherent media products.
Evaluation 3
The document discusses the feedback received from audiences at different stages of creating a music video.
In the first stage, the creator asked audiences questions about 3 potential songs to understand which would appeal most to their target audience. Most popular was "Bad Decisions".
Next, research was done on fan sites of the artist to better understand the target audience.
The most useful feedback came after sharing the first draft video. Comments helped identify aspects audiences enjoyed and improvements needed to better fit the target genre and demographic. Suggested changes were incorporated into the final edit.
2. research (14)
The document outlines research conducted on existing products, audiences, and interviews to inform the development of a new product. Research methods included analyzing features of existing products, distributing a survey online, conducting observations of audience behavior and interviews. The document evaluates the research process, discussing strengths and weaknesses of each method to understand the audience and features to include in the new product.
Evaluation 3
The audience feedback for the title sequence was generally positive but identified some areas for improvement. While most questions on the questionnaire received a majority response, some were nearly split 50/50, suggesting parts of the product did not meet expectations. The main features were liked but some areas were not as successful as hoped. One participant provided audio feedback, saying the effects were used appropriately but some parts needed longer pauses. He also offered advice on other options. The group learned they should have obtained more audience feedback earlier to improve the product and understand the target demographic better when making design decisions.
Group 4 Evaluation Q3 Ahmad Wahab
The document summarizes feedback from a survey about three media products: a documentary, radio trailer, and magazine double page spread. For the documentary, feedback was generally positive but noted room for improvement on sound levels and transitions. The radio trailer also received positive feedback but could have balanced sound levels better. Feedback indicated the magazine was professional and informative, though some wanted more images. In conclusion, the media products were largely successful but could be improved by paying closer attention to sound levels and image quality in future projects.
Unit 4, 5 and 62 questionnaire feedback
Kyle Mckendrick created a video to advertise a college course and gathered feedback through a questionnaire. Most respondents said the video successfully advertised the college as intended. Many liked the variety of camera angles used. Two suggested smoother panning movements. One would spread interviews throughout for more variation. Most felt interviews from current students were reassuring for prospective students. Overall, Kyle was happy with the positive feedback received.
GLIP-independent
Graham Hill discusses how Americans have exponentially more space in their homes now compared to 50 years ago. This has fueled a large personal storage industry to store excess possessions. However, Hill argues that owning less extraneous stuff and digitizing materials can lead to more happiness. He advocates choosing multifunctional items that provide long-term use rather than constantly acquiring new things, and notes owning less can help appreciate what really matters.
Teacher Policy Final Project
This research paper examines teacher policy recommendations from international organizations and whether evidence supports allocating resources primarily to teacher salaries. It assesses Brazil's FUNDEB policy which dedicates 60% of education funds to teacher salaries and finds mixed results on improving student learning. The paper aims to evaluate which measurable teacher characteristics have the strongest empirical support in relation to boosting student achievement outcomes.
Let’s celebrate!
The document discusses birthdays and favorite holidays. It mentions that one person's birthday is November 20th and the other's is December 2nd. Their favorite holiday is Christmas. It also includes lists about personality traits associated with different birthdays and names ranked in a certain order.
More Related Content
What's hot
Q3
The document summarizes what the author has learned from audience feedback on their media production work. They conducted early primary research using surveys to understand their target audience and presented feedback to their class. The author realized the importance of meeting audience expectations shaped by their exposure to other media. Feedback helped the author conform to conventions and tweak issues in their trailer. The feedback process highlighted key aspects like lighting, sound, and location to improve for future planning.
Evaluation question 3
The student gathered feedback from other classes and their own class on their music video and web pop-up advertisements. Most people felt the ads suited their intended audiences and effectively showed the product. Some comments suggested adding more locations or props to future ads. However, most feedback was positive, praising the exact lip syncing and good song choices. For the radio ad, listeners commented that the accent made it seem professional and the script was well-written and delivered. A challenge was that the student's survey tool failed to properly analyze the results.
Questionnaire results
The document summarizes the results of a questionnaire given to 10 people about Ryan Talmage's film trailer, poster, and magazine cover for a post-apocalyptic horror project. Most respondents felt the trailer effectively conveyed the genre conventions. The magazine cover was also seen as professional and fitting conventions well, though some improvements were suggested for layout and images. The film poster was found to be more mixed, with conventions portrayed effectively but some elements like colors and layout seen as needing improvement. Overall, the production was deemed a success at conveying the genre through technical elements and conventions, with only minor revisions suggested. All agreed Ryan created a clear brand identity.
Audience feedback
The filmmakers asked for feedback on their music video from social media and classmates to improve it. Most useful was feedback on Facebook that some shots were too long, so they added quick flashback shots to break up longer scenes. Classmates also noted some edits were poorly timed, which they fixed by tightening up parts of the footage.
Audience Feedback
The document discusses audience feedback the creator received on a music video production project. They created a questionnaire to gather feedback from a test audience of 10 people on the quality and suitability of the video and print products. Additional feedback was collected from social media sites like YouTube and Facebook. The feedback indicated that the audience found the video and branding successful overall, with fast editing reflecting the genre. Minor criticisms included some interior shots not fitting as well. The creator learned their target audience engaged positively with the work and branding was cohesive, while some shots could potentially be improved.
Audience theory
The student created a Facebook group to get feedback on a final music video project. They asked questions about how well the video met conventions of a pop music video genre, drew attention to its unusual concept, editing quality, and overall success. The most useful feedback noted that while the conceptual idea was original, not having a main character made it harder to relate to. Another comment said the timing of screen shots could be slightly improved. Positive feedback confirmed the video went against stereotypical pop video norms. This variety of feedback helped the student critically analyze responses and identify areas for improvement like practicing software skills more, establishing a main character, using a wider range of effects, and including fading shots and a broader image range.
Evaluation question 3 ppt
The document discusses audience feedback received for the film Tabula. It asked questions about first impressions, favorite parts, and areas for improvement. Audience members said they enjoyed the scary ending the most. Feedback indicated acting could be improved. Based on comments, the filmmakers shortened and improved acting for the final cut. Gathering feedback was limited by availability and recording equipment. Improving the setting and equipment for future feedback would make the process more professional. Audience testing is important for filmmakers to identify issues, make changes, and create the best possible final product.
Page layout t5 pro forma (2)
The document discusses different methods for sourcing images and processing images. It outlines the advantages and disadvantages of sourcing images from books, Google Images, stock image libraries, copyright free sites, and one's own existing images. It also discusses cropping, scaling, adjusting resolution, and manipulating images. The key points are that each source has benefits like quality, variety, and cost but also limitations regarding specificity, copyright issues, or lack of options. Processing images allows changing aspects like size and detail for different uses but can reduce versatility.
Question 3
We received limited feedback initially from our audience questionnaire, so we sent out emails and social media posts to get more feedback. The additional feedback we received provided constructive criticism and ideas on how to improve our product, such as opinions on our video's narrative, camera work, and representation of the song, as well as strengths and weaknesses of our digipak design and whether it fit the video's theme. Respondents also shared their honest opinion on our advert and how it could be improved to better fit the themes of the video and digipak.
7. factual evaluation(2)
The document summarizes the research, planning, production, and evaluation of a video project about autism. It discusses the strengths and weaknesses of each stage, and how improvements could have been made. Peer feedback praised the topic and visual elements, but suggested improving audio editing. The creator agrees audio could be enhanced and would make changes based on the feedback.
Evaluation Question 3
Through multiple iterations incorporating audience feedback, the filmmaker completely changed their film idea from "passing down the mantle" to something more action-packed. Feedback on early drafts noted that the story was sometimes disconnected and should have a moral. Later screenings with dialogue incorporated based on feedback helped clear up audience uncertainties. Feedback on animations was also useful, noting natural movement but broken character models at times. The filmmaker concluded that audience feedback was vital to developing professional and coherent media products.
Evaluation 3
The document discusses the feedback received from audiences at different stages of creating a music video.
In the first stage, the creator asked audiences questions about 3 potential songs to understand which would appeal most to their target audience. Most popular was "Bad Decisions".
Next, research was done on fan sites of the artist to better understand the target audience.
The most useful feedback came after sharing the first draft video. Comments helped identify aspects audiences enjoyed and improvements needed to better fit the target genre and demographic. Suggested changes were incorporated into the final edit.
2. research (14)
The document outlines research conducted on existing products, audiences, and interviews to inform the development of a new product. Research methods included analyzing features of existing products, distributing a survey online, conducting observations of audience behavior and interviews. The document evaluates the research process, discussing strengths and weaknesses of each method to understand the audience and features to include in the new product.
Evaluation 3
The audience feedback for the title sequence was generally positive but identified some areas for improvement. While most questions on the questionnaire received a majority response, some were nearly split 50/50, suggesting parts of the product did not meet expectations. The main features were liked but some areas were not as successful as hoped. One participant provided audio feedback, saying the effects were used appropriately but some parts needed longer pauses. He also offered advice on other options. The group learned they should have obtained more audience feedback earlier to improve the product and understand the target demographic better when making design decisions.
Group 4 Evaluation Q3 Ahmad Wahab
The document summarizes feedback from a survey about three media products: a documentary, radio trailer, and magazine double page spread. For the documentary, feedback was generally positive but noted room for improvement on sound levels and transitions. The radio trailer also received positive feedback but could have balanced sound levels better. Feedback indicated the magazine was professional and informative, though some wanted more images. In conclusion, the media products were largely successful but could be improved by paying closer attention to sound levels and image quality in future projects.
Unit 4, 5 and 62 questionnaire feedback
Kyle Mckendrick created a video to advertise a college course and gathered feedback through a questionnaire. Most respondents said the video successfully advertised the college as intended. Many liked the variety of camera angles used. Two suggested smoother panning movements. One would spread interviews throughout for more variation. Most felt interviews from current students were reassuring for prospective students. Overall, Kyle was happy with the positive feedback received.
What's hot (16)
Viewers also liked
GLIP-independent
Graham Hill discusses how Americans have exponentially more space in their homes now compared to 50 years ago. This has fueled a large personal storage industry to store excess possessions. However, Hill argues that owning less extraneous stuff and digitizing materials can lead to more happiness. He advocates choosing multifunctional items that provide long-term use rather than constantly acquiring new things, and notes owning less can help appreciate what really matters.
Teacher Policy Final Project
This research paper examines teacher policy recommendations from international organizations and whether evidence supports allocating resources primarily to teacher salaries. It assesses Brazil's FUNDEB policy which dedicates 60% of education funds to teacher salaries and finds mixed results on improving student learning. The paper aims to evaluate which measurable teacher characteristics have the strongest empirical support in relation to boosting student achievement outcomes.
Let’s celebrate!
The document discusses birthdays and favorite holidays. It mentions that one person's birthday is November 20th and the other's is December 2nd. Their favorite holiday is Christmas. It also includes lists about personality traits associated with different birthdays and names ranked in a certain order.
Company pres nov2011
Arctic Group is a Swedish IT consulting company with subsidiaries in Malaysia and Indonesia. It has four business units: Swedish IT Consultant, Consultant Broker, Product, and Malaysian IT Consultant. The company has grown significantly between 2006-2011 in terms of consultants, subcontractors, income and profits. It aims to further expand its offshore development centers and international sales. One of its products is ArcticTARIFF, a complete electronic tariff management system implemented in several European countries.
Media Evaluation - Question Two
The combination of the main product (a short film) and ancillary texts (a poster and film review) are effectively linked in three ways:
1) The poster and film use the same font for the title to clearly link the two products.
2) The poster features one of the main characters from the film to immediately show the audience they are related.
3) Still images and a quote from the film are used in the review to remind readers of the film and effectively link all the products together.
Tactisch marketingplan
Tactisch marketingplan voor Salomon. Na marktonderzoek onderzocht hoe Salomon haar Trailrunningschoenen in de Nederlande markt kan introduceren.
Comp Foundations: Executive Buy-in
The document discusses getting executive buy-in for compensation strategies and programs. It provides tips for communicating effectively with executives, such as framing discussions around business metrics, presenting data-backed problems and solutions, and regularly updating executives on the impact of compensation changes. The document also outlines some of the costs organizations can face when compensation is not properly aligned with the market, and stresses that keeping employees motivated and engaged through compensation is important for organizational success.
Dirección de equipos amv
Transparencias del curso de Dirección y Gestión de Equipos de Alfons M. Viñuela para Formactiva® El curso se complementa con videocasos, actividades individuales, de subgrupos y plenarias y la realización y visionadosde role-playings.
Shakespeare
El documento habla sobre William Shakespeare, incluyendo detalles sobre su infancia, vida profesional escribiendo obras de teatro, algunas de sus obras más famosas como Romeo y Julieta, y cómo sus obras continúan siendo representadas en teatro y llevadas al cine. También menciona el contexto del teatro isabelino y actores españoles que han interpretado papeles shakesperianos.
My Web intelligence - Une plateforme open source au service des humanités dig...
La plateforme opensource MyWebIntelligence (ou MyWI,) est un projet de recherche produit par le laboratoire MICA dans le cadre de l’Institut des Humanités Digitales qui vise à fournir un outil stratégique dans l’analyse et l’intelligence de la communication sur Internet.
Il s’agit d’un « crawler » d’une nouvelle génération qui constitue, à partir d’un dictionnaire de mots clés, une base de données des pages web qualifiées au service de l’intelligence stratégique. Il intégrera non seulement de nombreuses sources de données externes et Open Data mais aussi les derniers algorithmes de qualification de données (SNA, TextAnalysis, etc.)
Le CHU de Bordeaux a souhaité participer aux bêta tests de cette plateforme autour d’un projet pilote qui vise à mettre en place une étude débouchant sur une veille du discours thérapeutique et affilié. En effet le web a bouleversé l’ordre du discours médical. Première source d’information du patient et des accompagnants, il est un espace non structuré voire anarchique de prise de parole où la légitimité des savoirs et la hiérarchisation des connaissances s’avèrent difficiles. Pourtant ces « savoirs » sont aujourd’hui de plus en plus prégnant dans l’univers du malade.
MyWebIntelligence peut fournir les moyens d’appréhender, de qualifier et de hiérarchiser une masse de discours considérable afin de cartographier l’univers discursif de l’information médicale pédiatrique. L’ensemble du corps médical pourra ainsi non seulement avoir des études en temps réel sur le discours thérapeutique en ligne mais aussi mieux appréhender les acteurs hétérogènes du savoir et leurs stratégies argumentaires.
Dans la société digitale, si le médecin n’est plus seul dans la prescription médicale, le médecin 2.0 reprend une place prépondérante dans la diffusion de la prescription scientifique.
Retail Banking
1) The document discusses how a large multinational bank is using a Hortonworks data platform (HDP) data lake to gain insights from customer data across multiple channels and lines of business.
2) By storing all customer data in the data lake, the bank can get a single customer view, determine the best offers for customers across different channels, and increase revenues through targeted offers.
3) Other uses of the data lake discussed include risk modeling, liquidity risk simulations, capital markets trading data analysis, payment analytics, credit decisions, risk-based pricing of products, and enhancing trade surveillance and fraud detection.
Viewers also liked (16)
My Web intelligence - Une plateforme open source au service des humanités dig...
My Web intelligence - Une plateforme open source au service des humanités dig...
Similar to Media Evaluation - Question Three
Question 3
The document discusses obtaining audience feedback to improve media products. The author obtained feedback through Wallwisher, SurveyMonkey, Twitter, Facebook, and a focus group. SurveyMonkey questions hit the right target and identified improvements. Wallwisher allowed comments on drafts. The focus group noted the trailer's well-aimed tone but lacked title distinction and length. Overall, feedback identified strengths like conventions and weaknesses like an unclear storyline that led the author to create a teaser trailer instead.
Evaluation question 3
The document discusses the feedback received throughout the process of creating horror genre products. Initial feedback helped the creator make changes to better adhere to audience expectations of the genre. However, the first drafts of the poster and magazine were deemed unprofessional. Feedback indicated flaws in the images and staging. Social media feedback on later versions was mostly positive but limited and non-academic. Final feedback suggested some image improvements and adding more continuity to the trailer. Overall, feedback helped the creator successfully learn how to target audiences and represent the horror genre.
Q3 plan
The target audience for the creator's products is 15-24 year old students to appeal to a sense of youth and freedom. Feedback was gathered through an online survey linked on social media that asked about what was done well and could be improved. Suggestions to make lighting more consistent, include more camera movement, and use a variety of question types provided useful feedback to enhance the video's professionalism.
Audience feedback
The document discusses using online surveys and social media to collect feedback from an audience aged 18-20 about a music video. The surveys gathered both qualitative and quantitative data on age, gender, music tastes, and opinions on the video's length, narrative, editing, and print productions. While online surveys made data collection easy, getting people to participate was a challenge. The feedback revealed the video could have been longer and had a clearer narrative. Print designs received less criticism, with positive comments on their imagery. Overall, using multiple research methods helps gain better audience insights and identify areas for improvement.
What have you learned from audience feedback- evaluation 3
Audience feedback is important as it can help improve media products and marketing campaigns. There are many types of feedback, including box office results, reviews, surveys, focus groups, test audiences, website analytics, forums, and social media. The author received feedback on a short film from peers and teachers through questions about what was good and how to improve. For a film poster, peers provided feedback on genre accuracy and manipulation of materials to engage audiences. Questionnaires also helped the author choose the best poster. A teacher provided advice to shorten and refine a film review with more appropriate vocabulary. This feedback helped the author identify strengths and weaknesses to improve their work.
Evaluation Question 3
The document discusses the importance of audience feedback in improving media products. It describes using qualitative feedback in the form of surveys and focus groups to gather feedback on a movie poster, film review, and short film from target audiences. Feedback was useful in identifying needed improvements like adding more details, colors, and transitions. Though audience feedback helped strengthen the media products, there are limitations since the opinions of those providing feedback may differ from the broader target audience. Overall, the document advocates for using audience feedback in an iterative process to refine and improve media works for maximum audience approval and success.
Q3
The document discusses feedback received from the target audience on draft pieces created by the author. A Facebook page was used to get feedback on drafts of three pieces, and a survey was used to help pick the type of trailer to create. Feedback on an initial teaser trailer suggested making it shorter with more fast-paced shots. The author took this feedback and edited the trailer by adding more sound and music. Draft movie posters were also shared on Facebook to get feedback on which poster was the favorite.
Evaluation Question 3
The document summarizes feedback received on a music video from various collection methods. Positive feedback noted good camera quality and outfit/location changes adding dimension. Constructive criticism pointed out inconsistent lighting across locations, difficulty understanding the story, and timing of edits not complimenting the music well. The creator learned that ancillary tasks like still photos were more successful than the video, and that a more simplistic, editing-focused approach would have been better than attempting a high production quality video without professional resources.
Media studies evaluation question 3
The document discusses audience feedback received for a film project. Paragraph 1 discusses the importance of audience research in determining a film's success. Paragraph 2 describes the different methods used to collect feedback, including surveys, test screenings, and reviews of marketing materials. Feedback helped improve the trailer, poster, and magazine cover. Paragraph 3 discusses common feedback which highlighted issues to address, while also praising successful elements. Paragraph 4 outlines the specific changes made based on the feedback, such as altering images, editing, and filming additional content.
Evaluation question 5
The document summarizes how the author attracted and addressed their audience for a project. They distributed their project on Facebook and YouTube to reach teenagers as well as the general public. They received positive feedback about the plot, scenes, and representation of the thriller theme. Some comments suggested improving the lighting and camerawork in some scenes. The author feels the positive comments validated elements of their audience research, which highlighted the target audience's preference for fast pacing and short cuts.
Media evaluation – part 3
From gathering audience feedback on a film trailer, the author learned that it is difficult to get a large number of responses. Feedback from survey monkey and wallwisher provided some useful information but answers were often basic and limited. Key strengths identified were the engaging storyline and appropriate costumes, but weaknesses were that the horror genre was not clear from the lighting and sound effects used. If changing the trailer, the author would emphasize the horror-comedy genre more and alter the lighting and sound effects to better convey the genre. Audience feedback would be valuable for a product release to identify needed changes and gain promotion through word-of-mouth if viewers recommend it to others.
Question 3
The document discusses feedback received on a student's short film and ancillary products from audiences. For the short film, feedback indicated the narrative was boring and shots weren't varied enough. For ancillary products, feedback suggested poor picture choices, bland design, and an unfamiliar magazine choice. The student learned they should have gotten audience feedback earlier in the process and tested multiple options to improve the final products according to target audiences.
Media - audience feedback
The document provides feedback from audience members on a promotions package including a movie poster, trailer, and website. Key points:
- The audience unanimously agreed that the poster, trailer, and website were clearly linked and complimented each other well.
- Positives included the use of props, characters, and storyline across all pieces. Some specific design aspects like fonts and layouts were also praised.
- Minor issues with the poster included a stretched image and lighting. For the website, a profile could be improved and one image was cut off.
- Overall, the promotions package was deemed a success as it convinced the entire audience to see the film.
Q3 final products audience feedback
The document provides feedback from the target audience on various final products created by the author, including a trailer, magazine cover, and poster. For each product, the author asked the target audience a series of questions to gauge how conventional and effective the products were. Overall, the feedback was positive and suggested the products were generally conventional and successful. However, some responses also provided minor improvements that could be made, such as including credits in the trailer, adjusting some scene timings, and further optimizing images and layouts. This feedback will help the author continue improving their work.
Evaluation question 3
The document discusses feedback received on various promotional materials created for a horror film project. Key learnings include:
- Audience feedback indicated the trailer successfully followed horror conventions while maintaining originality. The editing, plot, and music were praised.
- Feedback on the magazine cover suggested adding an advertising label to make it seem more professional. This guidance was followed.
- Test audiences preferred an edited image focusing on the asylum setting over a character photo for the film poster.
- The final poster, trailer, and magazine cover were seen as cohesive and generating interest in the film through subtle repeated imagery.
Final product survey monkey analysis
I created a survey to gather feedback on my final projects from 16 respondents. The majority of respondents were in my target age group of 18-25. Respondents selected multiple aspects of the video that they liked and provided their own positive feedback. Some suggested minor changes like improving lip syncing or adding another location. All respondents agreed my projects maintained continuity. The feedback confirmed I successfully achieved my goals of a realistic, professional narrative that engaged audiences and conveyed emotions well.
Music Video Survey Feedback
The document summarizes audience feedback from a survey about a music video. Key findings include:
- The majority of respondents, who were mostly male and aged 11-20, rated the video 7/10 or higher.
- Aspects like camerawork, locations, and style were well-received, but editing could be improved.
- Mise-en-scene successfully captured the indie genre.
- The video followed conventions of indie rock videos but could benefit from a narrative.
- The feedback indicates the video will appeal to the target audience and possibly other groups.
Media evaluation Question 3
Oliver Beard received feedback from audiences during the construction of their media products. This feedback helped them decide which magazine cover design to pursue further and informed improvements to pacing and inclusion of voiceover in a film trailer. Audience comments also prompted changes to text size and images on the magazine cover as well as making characters on a movie poster more abstract. Overall, the feedback helped guide development but Oliver Beard also maintained their own input to create products they were happy with.
Audience feedback
The document discusses audience feedback received on media products created by the author for an indie/pop genre. A questionnaire was conducted with 5 people. Feedback was positive on the simple front cover design and eye-catching main image, though some felt it lacked detail. Most felt the design supported the music video. Color scheme feedback validated the author's simple, neutral style. Overall feedback was positive on the cohesive style across pieces. The author learned about enhancing front cover detail while maintaining genre conventions.
Trailer evaluation q3
The document discusses audience feedback received on a film trailer. It describes using Survey Monkey to collect feedback from a diverse range of viewers on YouTube, finding that the trailer appealed to both male and female young to middle-aged audiences. Most feedback was positive, though some noted inconsistent lighting and shaky camera work at times. The filmmaker addresses negative feedback and is pleased overall with the learning experience.
Similar to Media Evaluation - Question Three (20)
What have you learned from audience feedback- evaluation 3
What have you learned from audience feedback- evaluation 3
Media Evaluation - Question Three
- 1. Media Studies – A2 Evaluation 3. What have you learned from your audience feedback?
- 2. Main Product – Short Film I created a survey so that I could get feedback from my target audience. One of the questions that I asked was “do you think my film conforms to the conventions of a short film?” Thankfully, the majority of the responses I got to this question were positive and believed that my film did. Another question I asked if they thought the film matched the genre of supernatural/horror and, to this question, I got a mixed response. I also received a comment on the YouTube video itself which informed me of an issue with my short film so that I could improve it. I had also noticed this myself but, due to the footage and continuity errors I had, there was no way around this problem.
- 3. Ancillary Task - Poster In order to gain audience feedback for my poster I used website called WallWisher. This website allowed people to leave comments about my poster on what they liked and to give me idea on how to improve it. I received a few comments telling me what they liked and what could be improved such as adding more information about the film to the top of the poster and blending the images behind the Guide into the background a bit more. This is a point I particularly agree with as I feel those images might take the focus off the main image a bit too much.
- 4. Ancillary Task - Review I used surveymonkey.com again for audience feedback for my review. The feedback was mostly positive about my review. One of my questions was about the layout of the review and if the audience thought it matched what they would usually expect from a film review which all the responses told me that they did. I also asked for suggestions for improvement for my review and received a comment sating that the columns of the actual review didn’t seem to match in sizes as they were all different in width. This was due to the fact I was having difficulty fitting the entire review into the section but I do agree with this point that I could have ensured that they were all the same width as this would make my review a lot more effective.