This document discusses tooth separation techniques and matrices used in dental restorations. It covers two main topics:
1. Separators: Devices used to rapidly or slowly separate teeth during dental procedures. Rapid separators include wedges and Elliot separators, while slow separators include rubber bands, wires, and oversized temporary crowns.
2. Matrices: Devices that create a temporary wall for dental restorations when tooth structure is missing. Various matrix types exist for different cavity classes, including Tofflemire matrices for Class II cavities, shaped strips for Class III/IV, and window matrices for Class V. Matrices are made of materials like metal, cellophane or mylar and aim to confine
Overview of separators and matrices for various cavity preparations including Class I to V.
Explains tooth movement, reasons for separation, and principles of mechanical methods.
Detailed discussion on mechanical separation methods including fast and slow techniques.
Description of wedges, their ideal characteristics, and classification for effective dental procedures.
Innovations in dental wedges like Palodent plus and elastic wedges for improved isolation.Introduction and classification of matrices for various cavity preparations, highlighting their functions.
Details on specific matrices for Class I, II, III, IV, and V cavity preparations, including unique forms and indications.
References used for the presentation and thanks to the audience.
1. Seperators 3.Matrices • Matrices for Class III cavity prep:
• S shaped matrix
• Transparent strips
Matrices for Class IV cavity prep:
• L shaped matrix
• Transparent crown forms
• Anatomic matrix
Matrices for Class V cavity prep:
• Window matrix
• Cervical matrix
• Anatomic matrix
Matrices for Class III, IV, V cavity prep:
• Bioclear
• Unica
• Introduction
• Functions
• Reasons for seperation
• Principles of tooth movement
• Types of seperators
• Introduction
• Definitions
• Ideal requirements
• Objectives
• Parts
• Classification
• General priniciples of placement and removal
2. Wedges
• Introduction
• Ideal requirements
• Classification
• Wedge placement
• Techniques of wedging
• Recent advances:
Wedgeguards
Anatomic wedges
Elastic wedges
Matrices for Class I cavity prep:
• Barton matrix
Matrices for Class II cavity prep:
• Universal tofflemire
• Omnimatrix
• Slick bands
• Contouring of the matrix band
• Ivory 1, 8
• Black's matrices
• Steele's siqveland matrix
• Compound supported matrix
• Copper band matrix
• T band matrix
• Automatrix and modifications
• Reel matrix
• Pinch matrix
• Sectional matrices
Method
Contact rings
Classification,
• Contact forming instruments
CONTENTS
3.
1
3
2
Tooth movement isthe act of either seperating the involved teeth from each other, bringing
them closer to each other and or changing their spatial position in one/more dimensions
INTRODUCTION
To facilitate the creation of physiologically functional contact,
contour and occluding anatomy in the restored teeth
Function
Diagnosis of proximal caries, Reposition drifted teeth, matrix placement,
polishing restoration,remove the foreign bodies impacted proximally
Reasons for seperation
1 SEPERATORS
4.
Principal methods oftooth
movement
Rapid/immediate tooth
movement
Wedge principle:Elliot seperator,
wedges
Traction principle:Non interfering true
seperator, Ferrier double bow
seperator
Slow or delayed tooth movement
Rubber dam sheet
Seperating rubberband
Seperating ligature wires
Oversized resin
Temporary crowns
Orthodontic appliances
5.
Rapid tooth movement:
Mechanicaltype of seperation that
creates either proximal seperation at the
point of seperator's introduction or
improved closeness of the proximal
surface opp. the point of operator's
introduction
Wedge method:
More the wedge moves facially
or lingually when placed
proximally, more the seperation
Wedges
Elliot seperator Indications:
For short duration seperation that doesnt
necessitate stabilization
Examining proximal surface and final
polishing of restored contacts
Tooth seperation should not exceed 0.2-
0.5mm else damage and tenderness to pdl
6.
• Adjust thetwo opposite wedges of the
seperator interproximally so that they are
positioned gingival to contact area not
impinging on interdental papillae or
interceptal rubber dam. Move the knob
clockwise so that the wedges move towards
each other establishing desired seperation
7.
Traction principle
Non interferingtrue
seperator
Indicated when continuous stabilized
separation is required during the
dental operation.
Pros: separation can be increased
or decreased after stabilization, non-
interfering
Ferrier double bow seperator
The separation is stabilized
throughout the operation.
Pros- separation is shared by the
contacting teeth, and not at the
expense of one tooth, as with the
previous type of instrument
Always done with mechanical device which engage the proximal
surfaces of the teeth to be seperated by means of holding arms. These
are mechanically moved apart, creating seperation between clumped
teeth
8.
Slow(delayed) tooth movement
Rubberdam sheet Seperating rubber
band
Seperating wires Oversized resin
temporary crowns
Orthodontics
appliances
A small piece of heavy or
extra heavy rubber dam
sheet can be stretched
and positioned in the
contact area
Thin pieces of wires are
introduced beneath the contact
area to form a loop around the
contact area. The two ends can
be twisted together to create a
seperation not beyond 0.5mm.
Oversized mesiodistally
and periodically resin is
added in the contact
areas to increase the
amount of seperation
Most effective and
predictable
Used only when
extensive respositioning
is required
The wires can be tightened
periodically to increase the
seperation
Indication: When teeth have drifted considerably, rapid movement of teeth will endanger the
pdl.Therefore,slow tooth movement, over a period of weeks, will allow the proper positioning of teeth
in a physiological.
10.
2
Wedges
Devices which createrapid seperation of teeth during
preparation and restoration
Commonly used to prevent overhangs at the proximal area
which is an iatrogenic cause of periodontal pathology
11.
Ideal requirements
• Easyto apply and withdraw
• Shaped to minimize the risk of trauma to gingival and periodontal tissues
• Supplied in range of shapes and sticks
• Shaped to facilitate the restoration of proximal contours so that the deformation of
matrix band does not occur
• Disposable
• Radiopaque
• Rigid
• Non toxic, non irritant
• Stable in oral fluids
• Not fracture
• Available in bright colours
Palodent plus wedgeguard/
fender wedges
• Isolation and protection during restorative
treatment
• Matrix and wedge in one step, fast adaptation even
in the most complicated interproximal spaces. Easy
to use, control and removal for the fabrication of
Dental restorations.
• Available in 3 different colour coded sizes. Contains
50 units.
• Inserted into the inter dental space it provides a
protector for the tissue and separates the teeth,
simplifying the following application of a matrix.
• Can be applied buccally or lingually for optimal
access and vision.
Elastic wedges
• Forrubber dam placement
and isolation
• Autoclavable
• Mostly used in tight
contact cases
21.
3
Introduction
1. Class Icavity: No need of matricing due to confining walls
2. Matrices: Establish a temporary wall for the restoration
when one or more walls of tooth are missing
3. The word matrix is derived from the Latin word Mater’
which means Mother. It was introduced in the year 1871
by Dr. Louis Jack
MATRICES
22.
Definitions 1. isthe procedure, whereby a temporary
wall is created opposite to axial walls and surrounding
areas of tooth structure that were lost during preparation
2. is a device used during restorative procedures
to hold the plastic restorative material within the tooth
while it is setting.
23.
Ideal requirements
1. Easeof application
2. Not be cumbersome: for restoration condensation
or patient comfort
3. Ease of removal after hardening of restoration
4. Rigidity: To confine the restorative material during
condensation without displacement
5. Versatile enough to provide proper contact and contour
in various situations
6. Positive proximal pressure against the tooth during
restoration insertion
7. Non-reactive
8. Inexpensive
24.
Objectives
• It mustact as a temporary wall of resistance during
introduction of the restorative material.
• It should provide shape to the restoration.
• It should confine the restoration within acceptable
physiological limits.
• It must assist in isolating the gingiva and rubber
dam during introduction of the restorative material
• It must help in maintaining the dry operative field
thereby preventing contamination of the restoration.
25.
Parts
1. Band: Pieceof metal or polymeric material used to
support and give form to the restorative material during
its insertion and hardening. e.g. cellophane, celluloid, mylar.
Available as strips of various dimensions:
0.001-0.002 inch thickness
3/16 inch, 1/4 inch, 5/16 inch width
2. Retainer: Device by which the band can be maintained in
its designated position and shape.
e.g Mechanical device, dental floss, metal ring or
impression compound
26.
1. Custom-made or
anatomicmatrix.
e.g Compound
matrix
2. Mechanical matrix
e.g Ivory 1, 8,
Tofflemire
Depending on
its prep
1. Stainless steel
2. Copper band
3. Cellophane
(cellulose acetate)
4. Polyacetate (mylar)
Depending
on the
type of
band
material
1. With retainer
e.g. Tofflemire, Ivory
1, 8, Steele's
Siqveland matrix,
Sectional matrix
2. Without retainer
e.g. Automatrix,
Copper band, Al
band, Black's
matrices, Anatomic
matrix, S shaped , T
shaped, L shaped
matrix,
Depending on
the mode of
retention
1. Class I cavity with
buccal or lingual
extension
2. Class II cavity
3. Class III cavity
4. Class IV cavity
5. Class V cavity
Depending on
the cavity
preparation for
which it is used
Classification
27.
Class I cavitywith buccal
or lingual extension
E.g Double banded
tofflemire matrix
Class II cavity
• Single banded tofflemire
• Ivory 1, Ivory 8
• Compound Supported
matrix
• Copper band, T band,
precontoured matrices
• Automatrix
Class III cavity
• S Shaped matrix
• Cellophane strips
• Mylar strips
Class IV cavity
• Cellophane strips
• Transparent celluloid
crown forms
• Dead soft metal
matrix strips
Class V cavity
• Window matrix
• Tin foil matrix
• Preformed
transparent
cervical matrix
Depending on the cavity preparation for which it is used
GENERAL PRINCIPLES OFPLACEMENT AND REMOVAL OF MATRIX SYSTEMS
Check for contacts,
contours
Pre-wedging if
required in case of
tight contacts
Selection of matrix
system
Contouring of band
Placement of matrix
system
Wedge placement,
Support with
compound if
required
Inspection of proper
placement
Restoration of cavity
Removal of
compound, wedge,
matrix
Check for contact,
contours clinically,
radiographically
Indication;
Class I cavity
withbuccal or
palatal
extension
Since the
tofflemire
retainer with
band doesn't
intimately adapt
to lingual groove-
land sliding
Stainless
steel matrix (0.05
mm thick and 8 mm
wide) between the
lingual surface and
the band already
in place
• A quick setting, rigid polyvinyl siloxane (PVS)–based material/
• Green stick compound/
• The end of a toothpick wedge is covered with softened (heated) compound
may be used between the sectional matrix and the Tofflemire matrix band, to
prevent lingual displacement of the sectional matrix during condensation
Double Banded Tofflemire Matrix or Barton matrix
Universal Tofflemire Matrix
•Navy dentist, Dr. Benjamin Franklin
Tofflemire, 1946
• Made universal by the easy application
and removal of the holder from the band
without disturbing the condensed
material
• The retainer can be removed without the
band-more pt. comfort
• Helps to hold the cotton roll in place
36.
• Head isdirected gingivally
• Set screw (1), rotating spindle (2), slide (3), head
(4), band (5).
• The slide is positioned near the head for
installation of the band in the retainer and for
placement of band around tooth
• Rotating spindle/ vice moving nut adjusts the
distance between the slide and the head. This
movement adjusts the size of the loop
• Set screw/ vice screw nut locks and unlocks the
matrix band
37.
•
The junction bw
retainerand band
should always be
next to intact tooth
surface for stability
and prevention of
unnecessary
restorative material
accumulation
39.
Tofflemire
bands
Ac to thickness
Ultrathin:0.001
inch
Thin: 0.0015
inch
Medium:
0.0020 inch
Flat bands of
multiple shapes
Precontoured
bands-little or
no adjustment
Larger
circumference -
occlusal edge
Smaller
circumference-
gingival edge
40.
Contouring of thematrix band
Outside the patient mouth Inside the patient mouth
Band should be placed on a
resilient paper pad because
contouring cannot occur on a
non resilient surface
After placing the band and
retainer, the band is
burnished against the
adjacent tooth with burnisher
Used with firm pressure in
back and forth overlapping
strokes
The convex side of a spoon
excavator imparts a convex
contour to the matrix band
41.
2 thicknesses
of metal
bands:
.0015”,
ultrathin
.001”
Preassembled
and
disposable
tofflemire
retainer and
band
Less time
consuming
Single piece,
plastic
lightweight
retainer
with .002”
mylar/metal
bands Winged
or
wingless
Expensive
Omnimatrix
Pivoting head
Simply adjust the band's circumference by twisting the conical handle.
Ivory No. 1,8
Ivory 1 Ivory 8
Stainless steel band encircles
one proximal surface of
posterior tooth
Encircles entire crown of the
tooth
• Indicated in unilateral
class 2 cavities
• Tight distal contact
Indicated in
Unilateral/bilateral Class
II(MOD) of posterior teeth
Band attached to the
retainer with a wedge
shaped projection which
engages the tooth at the
embrasure of unprepared
surface
Cumbersome to place
Molar Premolar
44.
BLACK'S MATRICES STEELE'SSIQVELAND MATRIX
G. V. Black, 1900 The matrix consists of a circumferential band
with a thumbscrew retainer
Recommended for majority of small and
medium sized cavities
Indicated for restorations of three or more
surfaces
Black's matrix with a gingival extension: to
cover the gingival margin of a subgingival
cavity, a wire/floss is tied to the band to
prevent slippage and tied around the tooth
45.
Compound supported Matrix
system
Shapeof matrix after
trimming
Contouring
Burnishing
Placement, wedging,
compund support with cone
Contour altered by warm
burnishing instrument
46.
Copper band matrix
•Band stabilized with low fusing compound, pushed against the adjacent tooth
• After carving, cut on b/l and then remove
47.
T BAND MATRIX
•T shaped band
• When formed, the top portion of the T
allows the straight portion to adjust and fit
the circumference
• Curved/straight
• Narrow/wide
• Brass/steel
• The band is held in place with a flexible
metal ring: contact ring, placed with
special forceps and stabilizes the ends of
matrix band snugly
Pinch matrix: Pinchtowards tooth for tension
• Introduced by Kerr
• For Class II MO/OD/MOD composite fillings in
posterior area with the innovative integrated
opening system.
• The ring matrix band is 0.038 mm for stable
placement without distortion through tight intact
contact points.
• Three sizes
• Excellent patient comfort and better visibility of
the working area.
• The sectionalmatrix system and separation rings are made up of nickel-titanium
alloy to create a consistent force to separate teeth and then return to their original
shape after use, helping to deliver a tight gingival seal and anatomically shaped
restoration.
Precontoured bands of different dimensions
G ring/ bitine rings
55.
• D
Place amatrix band that most closely
approximates the occluso-gingival
height of the tooth. The band should be
oriented with concave edge towards the
occlusal margin of the tooth.
Insert wedge
Apply the 3D –ring retainer. Hold the
ring retainer with the ring placement
forcep and place it over the wedge.
Burnish the band in the desired contact
area against
the adjacent tooth and make sure there
is no springback of the band
Restore the cavity as desired.
Remove the ring, wedge and band.
Removal of the
ring and band may require the need of
forcep
56.
• First reportof a contoured
sectional matrix: Meyer
• Concept based on the
MCKean orthodontic
seperator is the surest
method of achieving good
contacts
• Two equal and opposite
forces cause seperation of
teeth: McKean principle
57.
Contact rings
• Accordingto their evolution, categorized as
First generation systems
Second-generation systems
• First generation systems
Introduced in the late 1990s
Include :-
• Palodent Bitine
• Contact matrix
• Composi-Tight
58.
Palodent BiTine Iand BiTine II
• First system that was available.
• Rings have rectangular parallel tines.
• Optimum separation (0.55 kg/mm).
• Lack of retentive design because of the
parallel tines but are easy to place on
wide preparations.
• BiTine II is an elongated ring to allow
stacking over the main ring in case of
MOD preparations
59.
Contact matrix
• Theserings have rectangular tines which
are converging and hence are more
retentive.
• Provide optimum separation (0.38
kg/mm).
• A reverse ring is available for MOD
preparations.
60.
Composi-Tight matrix
• Twoseparate rings are available for
premolar and molar teeth.
• The rings have converging tines with
retentive balls at the end for firmer
grip on the teeth.
• Omnidirectional.
• Drawback: Contacts produced are not
so tight (0.27 kg/mm).
• Large diameter of the rings can lead to
their collapse if used in wide cavities
61.
Problems with earlycontact rings
• Ring collapse or displacement in case of wide proximal boxes.
• Ring stacking that is, placing one ring over the other in case of MOD restoration is
a problem.
• Most importantly, since the contact rings are made of stainless steel, repeated
usage and sterilization effects make them lose their springiness over time
62.
Second - GenerationRings
Composi-Tight 3D soft face ring system
The orange Soft Face 3D-Ring The gray thin tine G-Ring
• Used in most circumstances
• Ease of placement
• Burnished tine ends
Ability to adapt to a wide variety of tooth
anatomies while reducing flash and restoring
proper contour
Used where the shape of the dentition makes
ring retention more problematic
63.
V3 ring system
Dr.Simon McDonald in 2008
2 types of rings for bicuspid and molar teeth
• Precontoured matrix bands
• Special wedge called the ''wave wedge''to provide optimum
gingival adaptation of the matrix band.
It has two major innovations
• Fully made of Nickel-Titanium ;imparts more springiness
and longevity than stainless steel.
• V-shaped plastic tines to accommodate the wedge.
• The tines have extra width that enables the ring to contact
more tooth structure buccally and lingually.
64.
Contact Forming Instruments
•These are special instruments designed to create good
contacts with posterior composites.
• They push the matrix toward the contact area during light
curing.
• Eg: Contact Pro, Optra contact
For amalgam (S shaped matrix)
• Ideal for Class III cavity prep on the distal of the cuspid with either a
labial access or lingual access
• Tofflemire used in case of incisal access
Mirror handle
used to produce
the S shape in
strip
The band is contoured
over the labial surface
of the cuspid and
lingual surface of
adjacent bicuspid
It is then placed
interproximally and
wedged apical to the
gingival margin and
covered with compound
over facial and lingual
ends
67.
For direct toothcoloured restorations
• Transparent plastic matrix strips
• Length of strip should just be sufficient to
cover the labial and lingual surface
• A wedge is trimmed and applied to hold the
strip in place
68.
Matrix for twosmall proximal preparations in
contact with each other
• Loop formed in strip. It is flattened
and creased with a finger, making a
T shape and trimmed
Transparent crown formmatrices
• These are ‘stock’plastic crowns, which can be adapted
to tooth anatomy.
• In bilateral class IV preparations use the entire crown form
but in a unilateral class IV cut the plastic crown
incisogingivally into two halves and use only the side
corresponding to the location of the preparation
• Should be perforated at the incisal angle.
• The prepared tooth is partially filled with the restorative
material while the matrix is completely filled
• filled
72.
Anatomic matrix
• Priorto preparing the tooth, study model
for the affected tooth together with atleast
1 intact adjacent tooth is made
• Preferred especially in multiple teeth
Anatomic matrix
Window matrix
•Formedusing either tofflemire matrix or
copper band matrix
•Window is cut in the band slightly smaller
than cavity outline
•Usually not indicated for very wide
cavities, occlusogingivally or mesiodistally
75.
Cervical matrix
•Different sizesand can be utilized with light cure
restorations.
•A handle is also provided to hold the matrix in place
till the material sets
80.
REFERENCES
• Operative Dentistry– MA Marzouk
• Art & science of operative Dentistry – Sturdevants (7th
edition)
• Textbook Of Operative Dentistry – Vimal K Sikri (3rd
Edition)
• Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry- Summitt's 4th ed.
• Clinical Operative Dentistry- Ramya Raghu 2nd ed.
#39 few techniques to remove the Tofflemire matrix without breaking the marginal ridge: • As the matrix edge is coming out of the contact, the matrix can be tipped so that the edge will not “flip” the newly carved marginal ridge and break it.• A condenser can be held against the marginal ridge to support it and prevent it from breaking as the matrix is removed. • The movement of the band should be primarily to the facial or lingual aspect as the band slips occlusally out of the contact.
#40 Getz Contour Matrix Band or Dixieland Band (Waterpik Technologies) developed by Dr Wilmer Eames-precontoured bands