The document discusses using planet data analysis as an astrophysics research method rather than relying solely on observational results. It argues that observational results without data analysis can lead to imaginary concepts. It provides examples showing relationships between various planetary properties like diameters, radii, and orbital distances. The document suggests the solar system should be viewed as one interconnected machine rather than independent planets, and questions concepts like the randomness of planetary formation and definitions of units like distance.
Research Summary
I- Research Main Questions
1- How Planet Diameter Is Created? (= How The Matter Is Created?)
2- How Planet orbital distance is defined (= What's The Space?)
3- Is There A Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance?
(i.e. Does Space effect on Matter Creation Process?)
II- Research Methodology
I use the planets data analysis to discover the concepts on which they are created?
(I use NASA Planetary Fact Sheet as the only source for Planets Data)
III- Research Hypothesis
(A) Research Primary Hypothesis (have no proves)
- The Matter is created of Energy (E=mc2 supports this idea)
- The Space is Energy (my Hypothesis)
(B) Research Main Hypothesis (have proves)
1- The Solar Group is One Building And Each Planet is A Part Of It
2- There Are Relativistic Effects In The Solar Group
3- Mars Orbital Distance is Changed Through Solar Group History
No Random Process Causes The Solar Group Creation (No Big Bang) Gerges francis
The Main Conclusion
The solar group can't be created by any random process.
i.e.
The Big Bang Concept is Unreal
The previous conclusion is produced easily and clearly through the solar planets data analysis..
That means…
The Big Bang Theory contradicts strongly and clearly with the solar planets data analysis and their geometrical meanings which supports the claim that, the big bang concept is Unreal one.
This paper tries to show and prove this contradiction and to show that the solar planets data analysis is the best way to understand the solar group origin and motion which necessitates to review many other theories concern the solar group origin an motion.
A summary of my research part 2- (matter creation discussion)Gerges francis
A Summary Of My Research -Part 2- (Matter Creation Discussion)
Abstract
We complete our discussion in the previous paper
A Summary Of My Research
Paper Hypothesis
Solar Planet Matter is Created Based On The Following Features:
A- Planet Matter Can't Be Created by Any Random process
B- Planet Matter Can't Be Created Independently From Other Planets Matters
(Planet Diameter and Mass supports this claim)
C- There's a direct relationship between planet diameter and orbital distance
The Earth moves with light velocity relative to the sun (i)Georgy Tawdrous
The Earth moves with C velocity (light velocity) relative to the Sun
i.e.
The light is produced by The Earth Motion, where
The Earth transforms her motion mechanical waves into light waves, producing the light beams
These light beams travel to the sun and reflect on her where the sun is just a mirror.
The Earth Motion = The Solar Planets Daily Velocities Total based on new time rate defined by the Earth.
In this paper we compare between the physics current theories which try to explain the solar system motions and the planets real data – this is a known process in physics
Example No. 1
Lorentz Length Contraction Phenomenon tells that- a particle with length L0 will be contracted to L1 when this particle travels with high velocity motion.
¬¬¬
So the question is – Why the particle length is contracted with high velocity motion?
Some physics books tell that, this contraction is just illusion of measurements!
That means, Lorentz Transformations measure illusions and not facts!
We refused that,
But if the particle own length contracted by high velocity motion –that will make the particle properties as a function of its motion – means –Particle mass is created by this particle motion
Newton told us a planet moves basically by masses gravity with the sun - so what's first and what's the second? what's the reason and what's the result
The mass causes the motion (Newton) or the motion defines the mass (Lorentz)?
Similar to this argument we will discuss how to discover the solar system.
Paper Objective
The paper tries to show that Jupiter Data can't be explained by the solar system current theories.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why the solar planet motion trajectory is an ellipse (revised)Gerges francis
Why The Solar Planet Motion Trajectory is An Ellipse?(revised)
Abstract
1- Solar Planet Motion Real Trajectory Is A Square (A Conclusion)
2- This square trajectory is seen by us as circular trajectory (because of Earth and moon motions)
3- Both forms of trajectory (square and circular) get interaction together and produce the ellipse trajectory as the planet motion final trajectory…. That's why the direct observation shows the planet motion trajectory as an ellipse (Kepler 1st Law is correct)
4- Planet Eccentricity supports this claim (i.e. the perihelion and aphelion points of planet motion trajectory proves that, this ellipse is produced by interaction between square and circular trajectories of motion)
5- The square and circular trajectories interaction is done because of Uranus and Neptune effects…
6- The interaction effect between the square and circular trajectories is found through the rate (4/π)
7- This effect is transported into the moon orbit in form (400/π) – and this transportation is done as Energy Transportation….
8- Saturn is the main player in the solar group geometry
This paper completes the discussion in my previous paper
Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Is A Square And Not An Ellipse
Paper Hypothesis
-Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
-Mars & The Earth Moon Motions are Interacting because "Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion"
i.e. Even If The Earth Moon is created by Mars Collisions with Venus and Earth (through Mars Migration Motion)- but the Geometrical building of The Moon Planet still controlled by the same rules based on which Mars, Venus & Earth Were Created!
Why??
Because the light motion is the cause behind the planet motion-
And because of that – All planets motions are controlled by this same light motion –
Shortly
The light motion is the master and maker of the road and all planets are followers.
The paper discusses this hypothesis deeply-
First let's remember Mars Migration Theory – to discover the historical events by which the earth Moon was created from Mars collisions debris with Venus and Earth
Mars Migration Theory Revision:
-Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had migrated to 227.9 mkm
-Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
-From the Collisions debris The Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris had attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-Impact Hypothesis is in consistency with Mars migration theory
But Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions.
Mars migration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties:
I.Why Venus has No Moon? – Because Mars had migrated and moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth has a greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth Position– so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II.The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
III.Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
IV.Why Mars diameter (and Mass) are decreased through the history? Because of the collisions – Mars diameter lost around ( 4.1 %) (And Mars mass also which causes difficulties for Mars gravitation equation)
V.Mars migration is done Because of The Sun Creation Process
VI.Is there a possibility that Mars will return to its original point (84 mkm)? Yes
VII. Why? Because the Planet orbital distance is defined relative to its diameter (and Mass) Mars now is in the wrong Position- but forced to it because of the sun effect
Conclusion
The Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars migration Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Hypotheses….
-The Moon Is A Light Beam (with known velocity 0.3 mkm) Sent From Uranus Carrying Energy To Earth
-The moon orbit is created by 1 second motion of light beam (with supposed velocity 1.16 mkm/sec).
-The moon passes through the moon orbit– which causes interaction or coherence between these 2 light beams (1.16mkm/sec – 0.3 mkm/sec)
-Based on this interaction the moon who was a light beam will be a planet (Transformation From Light State Into Matter State)
-The Moon Energy (As Light Beam) Is Stored.
-The Moon seeks to transport its energy to Earth
-Through Solar Eclipse Phenomena the moon transports the energy it carries from Uranus to Earth
-Energy is transported based on quantized measurements
-Solar eclipse cycles and calendars are so important because these periods tell when the energy quantum is ready to be used
-Solar Eclipse Job (Conclusion) Solar eclipse phenomena transports the energy from the moon to Earth through the Solar Umbra –
Research Summary
I- Research Main Questions
1- How Planet Diameter Is Created? (= How The Matter Is Created?)
2- How Planet orbital distance is defined (= What's The Space?)
3- Is There A Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance?
(i.e. Does Space effect on Matter Creation Process?)
II- Research Methodology
I use the planets data analysis to discover the concepts on which they are created?
(I use NASA Planetary Fact Sheet as the only source for Planets Data)
III- Research Hypothesis
(A) Research Primary Hypothesis (have no proves)
- The Matter is created of Energy (E=mc2 supports this idea)
- The Space is Energy (my Hypothesis)
(B) Research Main Hypothesis (have proves)
1- The Solar Group is One Building And Each Planet is A Part Of It
2- There Are Relativistic Effects In The Solar Group
3- Mars Orbital Distance is Changed Through Solar Group History
No Random Process Causes The Solar Group Creation (No Big Bang) Gerges francis
The Main Conclusion
The solar group can't be created by any random process.
i.e.
The Big Bang Concept is Unreal
The previous conclusion is produced easily and clearly through the solar planets data analysis..
That means…
The Big Bang Theory contradicts strongly and clearly with the solar planets data analysis and their geometrical meanings which supports the claim that, the big bang concept is Unreal one.
This paper tries to show and prove this contradiction and to show that the solar planets data analysis is the best way to understand the solar group origin and motion which necessitates to review many other theories concern the solar group origin an motion.
A summary of my research part 2- (matter creation discussion)Gerges francis
A Summary Of My Research -Part 2- (Matter Creation Discussion)
Abstract
We complete our discussion in the previous paper
A Summary Of My Research
Paper Hypothesis
Solar Planet Matter is Created Based On The Following Features:
A- Planet Matter Can't Be Created by Any Random process
B- Planet Matter Can't Be Created Independently From Other Planets Matters
(Planet Diameter and Mass supports this claim)
C- There's a direct relationship between planet diameter and orbital distance
The Earth moves with light velocity relative to the sun (i)Georgy Tawdrous
The Earth moves with C velocity (light velocity) relative to the Sun
i.e.
The light is produced by The Earth Motion, where
The Earth transforms her motion mechanical waves into light waves, producing the light beams
These light beams travel to the sun and reflect on her where the sun is just a mirror.
The Earth Motion = The Solar Planets Daily Velocities Total based on new time rate defined by the Earth.
In this paper we compare between the physics current theories which try to explain the solar system motions and the planets real data – this is a known process in physics
Example No. 1
Lorentz Length Contraction Phenomenon tells that- a particle with length L0 will be contracted to L1 when this particle travels with high velocity motion.
¬¬¬
So the question is – Why the particle length is contracted with high velocity motion?
Some physics books tell that, this contraction is just illusion of measurements!
That means, Lorentz Transformations measure illusions and not facts!
We refused that,
But if the particle own length contracted by high velocity motion –that will make the particle properties as a function of its motion – means –Particle mass is created by this particle motion
Newton told us a planet moves basically by masses gravity with the sun - so what's first and what's the second? what's the reason and what's the result
The mass causes the motion (Newton) or the motion defines the mass (Lorentz)?
Similar to this argument we will discuss how to discover the solar system.
Paper Objective
The paper tries to show that Jupiter Data can't be explained by the solar system current theories.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why the solar planet motion trajectory is an ellipse (revised)Gerges francis
Why The Solar Planet Motion Trajectory is An Ellipse?(revised)
Abstract
1- Solar Planet Motion Real Trajectory Is A Square (A Conclusion)
2- This square trajectory is seen by us as circular trajectory (because of Earth and moon motions)
3- Both forms of trajectory (square and circular) get interaction together and produce the ellipse trajectory as the planet motion final trajectory…. That's why the direct observation shows the planet motion trajectory as an ellipse (Kepler 1st Law is correct)
4- Planet Eccentricity supports this claim (i.e. the perihelion and aphelion points of planet motion trajectory proves that, this ellipse is produced by interaction between square and circular trajectories of motion)
5- The square and circular trajectories interaction is done because of Uranus and Neptune effects…
6- The interaction effect between the square and circular trajectories is found through the rate (4/π)
7- This effect is transported into the moon orbit in form (400/π) – and this transportation is done as Energy Transportation….
8- Saturn is the main player in the solar group geometry
This paper completes the discussion in my previous paper
Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Is A Square And Not An Ellipse
Paper Hypothesis
-Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
-Mars & The Earth Moon Motions are Interacting because "Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion"
i.e. Even If The Earth Moon is created by Mars Collisions with Venus and Earth (through Mars Migration Motion)- but the Geometrical building of The Moon Planet still controlled by the same rules based on which Mars, Venus & Earth Were Created!
Why??
Because the light motion is the cause behind the planet motion-
And because of that – All planets motions are controlled by this same light motion –
Shortly
The light motion is the master and maker of the road and all planets are followers.
The paper discusses this hypothesis deeply-
First let's remember Mars Migration Theory – to discover the historical events by which the earth Moon was created from Mars collisions debris with Venus and Earth
Mars Migration Theory Revision:
-Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had migrated to 227.9 mkm
-Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
-From the Collisions debris The Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris had attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-Impact Hypothesis is in consistency with Mars migration theory
But Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions.
Mars migration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties:
I.Why Venus has No Moon? – Because Mars had migrated and moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth has a greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth Position– so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II.The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
III.Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
IV.Why Mars diameter (and Mass) are decreased through the history? Because of the collisions – Mars diameter lost around ( 4.1 %) (And Mars mass also which causes difficulties for Mars gravitation equation)
V.Mars migration is done Because of The Sun Creation Process
VI.Is there a possibility that Mars will return to its original point (84 mkm)? Yes
VII. Why? Because the Planet orbital distance is defined relative to its diameter (and Mass) Mars now is in the wrong Position- but forced to it because of the sun effect
Conclusion
The Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars migration Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Hypotheses….
-The Moon Is A Light Beam (with known velocity 0.3 mkm) Sent From Uranus Carrying Energy To Earth
-The moon orbit is created by 1 second motion of light beam (with supposed velocity 1.16 mkm/sec).
-The moon passes through the moon orbit– which causes interaction or coherence between these 2 light beams (1.16mkm/sec – 0.3 mkm/sec)
-Based on this interaction the moon who was a light beam will be a planet (Transformation From Light State Into Matter State)
-The Moon Energy (As Light Beam) Is Stored.
-The Moon seeks to transport its energy to Earth
-Through Solar Eclipse Phenomena the moon transports the energy it carries from Uranus to Earth
-Energy is transported based on quantized measurements
-Solar eclipse cycles and calendars are so important because these periods tell when the energy quantum is ready to be used
-Solar Eclipse Job (Conclusion) Solar eclipse phenomena transports the energy from the moon to Earth through the Solar Umbra –
Is the 2737 Phenomenon a real one?
1- The Cycle 2737 years is a real one
2- The Cycle 2737 years refers to the sun inner main changes
3- The Sun energy depends on the solar planets motions energies accumulation (and doesn't depend on any nuclear interactions occurring inside the sun)
i.e. the solar planets motions mechanical waves (Energy) are transferred into light waves (Energy= sun rays)
4- Solar planet motion energy is accumulated daily and technically by lorentz length contraction effect, where solar planet motion is a relativistic one.
5- Solar planet motion energy is concentrated inside the space regularly and technically by lorentz length contraction phenomenon, where the space stores Energy with different densities.
6- Solar Planets Motions Energies Total Produces The Sun Rays
7- The moon daily motion shows the lorentz contraction effects in the solar group, i.e. the Lorentz contraction effects are found daily and that means the planet usual daily motion causes lorentz effects which causes the Space stored energy to be concentrated..
Mars Migration Theory Supports The Conclusion That "Saturn Must Be Created After The Earth Moon Creation"
Mars Migration Theory Revision:
- Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had migrated to 227.9 mkm
- Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
- From the Collisions debris The Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris had attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-Impact Hypothesis is in consistency with Mars migration theory
But Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions.
Mars migration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties:
I. Why Venus has No Moon? – Because Mars had migrated and moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth has a greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth Position– so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II. The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
III. Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
IV. Why Mars diameter (and Mass) are decreased through the history? Because of the collisions – Mars diameter lost around ( 4.1 %) (And Mars mass also which causes difficulties for Mars gravitation equation)
V. Mars migration is done Because of The Sun Creation Process
VI. Is there a possibility that Mars will return to its original point (84 mkm)? Yes
VII. Why? Because the Planet orbital distance is defined relative to its diameter (and Mass) Mars now is in the wrong Position- but forced to it because of the sun effect
Conclusion The Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars migration Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The solar system motion analysis (questions and answers)Gerges francis
The Solar System Motion Analysis (Questions and Answers)
Abstract
Paper objective
- This paper contains 5 questions and their answers concerning the solar system motion analysis
The Questions Are:
- Question no. (1). Why should The solar Planets Data Analysis be considered a basic tool in the solar system motion research? (page no. 2)
- Question no. (2) Can far planets (as Jupiter and Uranus) effect on the Earth moon motion? (page no. 5)
- Question no. (3) Can the classical mechanics explain the solar system motion? (page no. 14)
- Question no. (4) How The Sun Is Created? (page no. 18)
- Question no. (5) Why couldn't Titius Bode Law predict Neptune’s orbital distance? (page no. 34)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Motion Analysis (Questions and Answers) (III)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper objective
The paper provides (51-97) questions and answers concerns the solar system motion analysis – The questions are:
50- (repeated) How the planets data be created?
51- Are there relativistic effects in the solar system motions?
52- Can 1 second of Mercury Motion be = 9.18 Seconds of Pluto Motion?
53- Why Jupiter orbital circumference = the inner planets orbital circumferences total?
54- Can Uranus Motion Effect On Venus Axial Tilt
55- Why does Jupiter Motion Data Depend On The Rate 1.16
56- Why does the Earth moon regress 19 degrees yearly
57- Why Earth Circumference = the 5 inner planets diameters?
58- Why Bode Law Couldn't Predict Neptune Orbital Distance?
59- Can Uranus effect on the Earth moon motion?
60- Why does the moon create an angle between its displacement direction and its orbital horizontal level?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Motion Analysis (Questions and Answers) (II)Gerges francis
Paper objective
The paper provides (1-50) questions and answers concerns the solar system motion analysis – The questions are:
1- Why do Venus and Uranus rotate on their axes, or spin, in a clockwise direction?
2- Does aether wind exist?
3- What are the major and most effective refutations of Einstein’s Theories of Relativity? Question Asked December 6, 2019.
4- Which is the most convincing physical experiment (Not Thought Experiment) that conclusively validates Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity?
5- The advance of Mercury perihelion is achieved in Newtonian gravity
6- Is Gravity a Push or a Pull?
7- Is our solar system exemplary for all other planetary systems?
8- Life on Mars: Open discussion
9- What do you think about wave-particle duality?
10- Is there somebody who believes in the theory of Everett (multitude of universes)? Do Einstein's Field Equations allow multiple universes?
11- Do the Gravitational force in between two objects depends on the most probable distance in between them?
12- What's underline the Lorentz transformation? And what's the dimension of the space?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Total Solar Eclipse Phenomena proves the following claim.
- The Solar group is one Trajectory of Energy and Each Planet is a point on it
- The Solar group can be similar to one machine and each planet is a gear in this same machine
- The solar group can be similar to one body and each planet is a member in this same body (where the same energy creates all solar planets and their orbital distances, similar to the blood which causes to create all body members)
- Also the solar group is a similar to a great river has many canals where these canals create soils on their banks (the soils are similar to the planets and the canals are similar to the orbital distances)
- The solar planets motions are done in cooperation with each other to perform one job where each planet motion does one task in this same great job
Clearly
The total solar eclipse is done because of a geometrical reason which creates the planets diameters (and even the sun diameter) in geometrical relationships with their distances to enable the total solar eclipse to be occurred
Shortly
No one Solar Planet can be found or move independent from the other planets (even the sun can't be found without the solar planets)
Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon?
Abstract
Paper Question
"Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon?"
Based on what this question is asked? What meaning is behind?
The Earth Moon is created by a direct effect of Jupiter – means – if Jupiter doesn't effect directly on the Earth Moon Creation – the moon should have change in its own data
i.e.
The Earth moon has its own data values (diameter - mass – orbital inclination …etc) this data is created by its Values because of Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon Creation otherwise this data should be changed
Shortly
- If Jupiter didn't effect on the Earth moon creation process – the Earth moon diameter shouldn't be 3475 km and its mass should change from 0.073x 1024 kg also its orbital distance can't be 0.384 mkm and axial tilt should change from 6.7 degrees and its orbital inclination should not be 5.1 degrees ….similar to that, all Earth Moon Data should be changed…
- The next question is – Why Jupiter did effect on the Earth Mon Creation? This question is out of this paper scope – here we try to prove that – the Earth Moon Data is created by its values just because of Jupiter effect on it.
- How to prove this claim – I use The Planets Data Analysis Direction as a method of astrophysics research to prove this fact –
(The Planets Data Direction Method is explained in the paper methodology)
Paper Contents
2- Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon Creation?
3- Mars Migration Theory Revision
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper question
How Does The Gravity work?
The Question Explanation
- The motion at distance is one basic question still needs a sufficient answer.
- The mass gravity concept gives us no geometrical mechanism or any explanation concerns the gravity works mechanism, so we don't know if the gravity needs time or works immediately, or if the gravity causes the space to be formed in some geometrical form to perform the gravity effect.
- We have only the word (gravity) which means, some mass will cause another mass to be moving at distance but no details how this motion is done …
- Venus and Saturn motions data gives some reference that these 2 planets motions depend on one another.
- How Venus and Saturn motions can be performed depending on each other? Whatsoever the answer is, it means, (some effect at distance) is found between these 2 planets.
- Can this effect be a reason for the motion at distance which we search for?
The paper analyzes the 2 planets motions data to see if such effect can be found between the 2 planets and How this effect can be transported from one planet to another?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Cycle 2737 Years Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Cycle 2737 years depends on Metonic Cycle,
Metonic Cycle is produced by an effect of Uranus Motion on the Earth Moon motion.
Mercury, Venus and Saturn be effected by Uranus motion effect on the moon motion. As a result these 3 planets create the Cycle 2737.
Paper objective
- The Paper provides my claim against Nobel Prize Decision for Physics 2021
Paper hypothesis explanation
- In December 2012, many sites referred to some new astronomical phenomenon be repeated one time each 2737 years. The 3 planets (Mercury, Venus and Saturn) be in parallel above the 3 great pyramids heads in Egypt – this interesting event be occurred while the Mayan calendar be ended its long cycle (more than 5000 years)
- Some people expected great earthquake during December 2012, but nothing be occurred. Some people told that they recorded the event of the cycle (2737) and other people claimed that the event is not true.
- I have searched after a theoretical method to know if this cycle is a real one. This is an interesting approach because it answers why the cycle be done? For example we don't know why Earth has a cycle of 4 years (1461 days). That makes this approach is a rich method in discussion and analysis
- The research conclusion I have written in a hypothesis form. Metonic Cycle be produced by Uranus Motion Effect on the moon motion.
- This conclusion be supported by the fact, Uranus Orbital Distance = 19.2 Earth Orbital Distance. And if Uranus and Earth move by equal velocities, Earth would revolve around the sun 19.2 revolutions (years) while Uranus revolve around the sun one revolution only – while Metonic Cycle be 19 years – the equal values (19 and 19.2) give some confidence that Uranus motion caused Metonic Cycle
- This conclusion is the paper discussion cornerstone. Because it disproves Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity. Newton theory is an imaginary idea and no planet moves by the sun gravity. Because of that, The planets motions data and features contradict Newton Theory of The sun gravity.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Paper provides many questions to deepen the theory discussion
Basically
We try here to analyze the main concept that
"Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion"
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
Uranus and Neptune are perpendicular on Saturn level
i.e. Saturn Orbital Distance locates at horizontal level with all planets (Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn) – let's call it (Saturn level)
Uranus and Neptune are on vertical level related to Saturn level - let's call it ( Uranus level)
So Uranus level is perpendicular on Saturn level
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
mrwaheid@gmail.com
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory Gerges francis
Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
- Where
- Planet Motion Features Prove Light Motion Effect On Planet Motion.
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- Many new features are discovered in the solar planets motions among which:
- (1) The Solar Planets Move One Unified General Motion
- (2) The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates of Time
- (3) The Solar system Distances Be Created In A Network Form
- (4) The Solar Planets Motions Data Be Used Mutually Among Planets
- The previous features disprove Planet Motion Independency Concept inherited by Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity- the features simply gives us a different vision about the solar system motion.
- Instead of the rigid body moving by the sun mass gravity independently from other rigid bodies in creation and motion data, The Solar Planet be a similar to a point on one trajectory of energy. where the solar planets move together one unified motion as train carriages transporting among the planets the motion with the rates of time making the solar system as a great Clock its input one motion creates (one second) and its output another motion creates (one solar day).
- And the 2 motions depend on one another as 2 gears in one machine of gears.
- Can this vision be a fact?
- I claim Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity is created out of imagination basically because the sun is created after all planets creation and motion.
- How can I prove my idea against Newton theory?
- By Planets Motions Data Analysis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Jupiter Has A Cycle Of 8 Days (II) (Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis:
Planet day period is defined depends on other planets motions
Paper objective:
The paper discuss if this fact supports the hypothesis (Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion)
Paper contents
1- Planet Velocity And Diameter Relationship
2- Planet Day Period Definition
3- The Moon Day Period Discussion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Is Saturn The Last Planet Created In The Solar System (II)Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
Saturn Is The Last Planet Created In The Solar System
We complete our discussion about this hypothesis which we have started in the paper
Is Saturn The Last Planet Created In The Solar System?
The Idea Summary
- Saturn Data Is Similar To Other Planets Data – for example – Saturn Orbital Distance = Mars Orbital Circumference
- This data refers to that –Saturn may be created after Mars Creation (or vice versa) – but = because Saturn data depends on different planets data – for example – Saturn Diameter = Venus Circumference x π - So such data leads to the conclusion that Saturn may be created after all other planets – means – Saturn is the last planet created in the solar system
- Based on this claim we have 2 questions to discuss
o (1st Question) Can Any Planet Data Be Created Depending On Any Other Planet Data?
o (2nd Question) why Saturn data is created by these specific values? For example – Saturn orbital distance = Mars orbital circumference – based on that – I claim Saturn orbital distance is created depending on Mars orbital circumference – the question is – why? why Saturn doesn't any other planet orbital circumference? Why specially used Mars orbital circumference? And generally – if Saturn data is crated based on some planets data why Saturn used these specific planets data and other's
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time (Revised)Gerges francis
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time (Revised)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
Paper Hypothesis Explanation
- The planets motions rates of time be defined by using ONE RULE
- Based on the planets motions rates of time, the planets orbital periods and distances be defined. means,
- Based on this One Rule, the solar planets orbital periods and distances be defined.
- If the solar planets motions be independent from one another, how their orbital periods and distances be defined based on one rule only?
- The paper provides a proof that, the planets motions use different rates of time which proves that, the solar planets move one unified general motion. means,
- The solar planets motions be integrated with one another and created one unified general motion, because of that, the planets motions need to use different rates of time to enable their motions to be integrated into one unified general motion.
- This fact changes the solar system description inherited from Newton theory of the sun mass gravity. The solar planets be similar to carriages in one train move together one unified motion. also the solar group can be similar to a mechanical clock, and the planets be similar to the gears of this clock. Each gear does one motion (and creates one rate of time) and these motions be integrated into one unified gnarl motion (and the rates of time be integrated into one unified general rate of time)
Paper objectives
- The paper provides the rule based on which all solar planets orbital periods and distances be defined, and test all planets motions data to prove that, no planet motion contradicts this rule.
- The paper tries to answer the question (why the solar planets use different rates of time) by providing The Solar System Creation And Motion Theory.
- The paper is divided into 2 parts.
- (1st Part) Provides the rule and its proves discussion
- (2nd Part) Provides The Solar System Creation And Motion Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Does Earth Velocity Causes The Eclipse Phenomena? (T.S. Eclipse III) Gerges francis
Why We See the Sun Disc = the Moon Disc? (T.S. Eclipse II)
Total Solar Eclipse Analysis (Part I)
In this paper we ask does Earth velocity effects on total solar eclipse?
We deal here with the velocity and not the motion
That means
The question can be as following:
If Earth moves by different velocity, can that effect on the eclipse phenomena?
Let's think ….
Why the total solar eclipse is occurred? Because the moon moves between the sun and Earth…! It's NOT Enough….
Venus moves between the sun and Earth but doesn't cause any solar eclipse…. The point here that we see the sun disc = the moon disc…. That's why when the moon moves between the sun and Earth that creates solar eclipse….
Why we see the moon disc = the sun disc? We have discussed that in (part II)
Here we deal with new question…
If Earth velocity changes, does it effect on the solar eclipse?
Let's think
The total solar eclipse is a process done by 3 players (Earth, moon and the sun). to put the three planets on the same straight line we need some configuration between the 3 planets motions to produce the angle 180 degrees between the 3 players…
So Earth velocity is a player which faces the 2 other players… any velocity change may effect on the eclipse geometrical structure but to perform the eclipse event the three players have to cooperate with each other…
The Concept (Cooperation And Integration)
This concept is what I try frequently to explain and prove.
Without the cooperation and integration between the planets the solar group can't be found or even can't be created…! The cooperation is the source of life .....etc
The Gravity Origin Theory
The Planets Data Analysis Suggests The Following Theory:
-The Solar System Is Created Originally By A Light Motion
-The Light Motion Is The Distance Creator And Energy Provider
-The Planet Is A Point Follows The Light Motion Through The Same Distance And Receives The Available Energy
-The planet matter is created as a function of the planet motion and because of that the planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, orbital inclination, axial tilt …etc….and all the planet data is created to be in harmony and consistency with the planet motion, That because the motion is found before the matter creation and the matter is created to be in harmony with this motion – for that reason the planet (matter) data is in harmony with this planet motion
-The matter is found based on its motion – that means – the motion was found before the matter creation
-The matter is found based on its motion and because of that the matter will be perished if the motion is finished
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Did Lorentz Ask (How The matter is Created)Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
Lorentz believed, The matter is created out of light, or at least, the matter is created by an effect of Light velocity.
The Question Explanation
- There are 2 basic proves for the paper hypothesis which are:
- Lorentz Transformation Equations
- Lorentz Space Mechanical Features
- The paper argues, because Lorentz believed, the matter is created out of light, the transportation of energy among matters be a basic feature.
- The transportation of energy among matters can be used in another form. (A motion transportation among the solar planets)
- The motion transportation among the solar planets is a massive important process because it may explain how the motion at distance is done.
- The masses gravity theory gives us no geometrical mechanism by which a mass can cause another mass motion. Also we can't attribute any mechanical features to the space which transports the gravity effect from one mass to another.
- The paper provides a proof that, Venus Motion Data is transported to Saturn and used as Saturn motion data.
- By that, the paper shows, Some Transportation of (DATA) be done between the 2 planets which may prove (A Motion Is Transported Among The Solar Planets)
- The motion transportation among the planets (if be proved) will be a suitable solution to answer the question (how the motion at distance is done?) and also will be supported by Lorentz studies and equations…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
My Research Hypotheses
Abstract
During 2013-2019 I have studied the solar system geometry. Based on this study I have formed the following 5 basic hypotheses:
Hypothesis No.1
Solar System is One building (or one machine) and each planet is a part of this same building.
Hypothesis No.2
Solar System moves as a train. i.e. A train moves with all its carriages together, similar to that – Solar Planets move together as one train in one unified motion (i.e. No Planet moves individually or independently from other planets motions)
Hypothesis No.3
Planet motion for 1 solar day depends on energy of light motion for 1 second period – that means – Planet moves following light motion – i.e. – Planet motion shows double motions – (1st) Light Motion (2nd) Its Follower Planet Motion
Hypothesis No.4
Solar System Unified Motion depends On Solar Day Period
Hypothesis No.5
Matter Creation process depends on solar day period of time – that means – Matter creation process depends on the time as one of its main components
In this paper I try to explain these 5 hypotheses and provide short proves for them
Why Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance?Gerges francis
Why Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance?
Best regards
When I have discovered that..
Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance
I have asked Why? But the usual answer was ……
It's Pure coincidence….!
Later I have discovered more equalities….As the following:
1. Saturn Orbital Distance = Mars Orbital Circumference = Pluto Eccentricity distance = Saturn Uranus Distance = 1433.5 million km
2. Mercury Saturn Distance = Neptune Pluto Distance = 1375 million km
3. Saturn Pluto Distance = Mercury Neptune Distance = 4436.5 million km
Then I have asked again… why These Distances Are Equal? Is there a geometrical reason behind?…but the usual answer always be …. " Pure Coincidences"
The question wasn't so simple and the answer was mentioned…. I ask clearly… are the solar planets members in the same body? or parts in the same building?- shortly are the solar group as the human hand and the fingers are similar to the planets? means the planets are created and moving depending on each other because all of them consist one machine –one body –one building – one geometrical structure – means the planets aren't separated from each other– but connected with each other.
(that means the space between the planets is a method to connect each planet with others and not to separate each planet from the others)…. This is my question aim!
And the current theory understood that clearly…
And told also a clear answer … that
Any solar planet is separated from the others - each planet is found and move independently..
So the two visions are clear before our eyes ……And the fighting is clear also….
The Solar Group Classical Vision: tells us that… the planet is created independently and move by gravity with the sun without effect of the other solar planets….
My Suggested Vision Is:
The Solar Group is one body – one machine – one building – one geometrical structure – No Planet can be found or move independently from the other planets …. Even the sun herself can't be found without the solar planets… we deal here with one machine – one geometrical structure- so if this geometrical structure has many elements we should be wise enough to see that these elements are members in the same geometrical structure and this structure is found by the cooperation and integration of his members…..
We should fight to prove that we are correct and the current theory is mistaken… Please read the argument…
Jupiter Orbital Distance Proves, We See Wrongly The Solar Group,Gerges francis
This paper tries to prove the following hypothesis:
Hypothesis No. (1)
- Jupiter Is The Solar Group Central Point
- Jupiter Orbital Distance contradicts the solar group current description
Hypothesis No. (2)
- Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Can't Be An Ellipse
- Earth Moon motion effects on our vision and force us to see Planet Motion Trajectory as an ellipse (which is a wrong vision)
Is the 2737 Phenomenon a real one?
1- The Cycle 2737 years is a real one
2- The Cycle 2737 years refers to the sun inner main changes
3- The Sun energy depends on the solar planets motions energies accumulation (and doesn't depend on any nuclear interactions occurring inside the sun)
i.e. the solar planets motions mechanical waves (Energy) are transferred into light waves (Energy= sun rays)
4- Solar planet motion energy is accumulated daily and technically by lorentz length contraction effect, where solar planet motion is a relativistic one.
5- Solar planet motion energy is concentrated inside the space regularly and technically by lorentz length contraction phenomenon, where the space stores Energy with different densities.
6- Solar Planets Motions Energies Total Produces The Sun Rays
7- The moon daily motion shows the lorentz contraction effects in the solar group, i.e. the Lorentz contraction effects are found daily and that means the planet usual daily motion causes lorentz effects which causes the Space stored energy to be concentrated..
Mars Migration Theory Supports The Conclusion That "Saturn Must Be Created After The Earth Moon Creation"
Mars Migration Theory Revision:
- Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had migrated to 227.9 mkm
- Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
- From the Collisions debris The Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris had attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-Impact Hypothesis is in consistency with Mars migration theory
But Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions.
Mars migration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties:
I. Why Venus has No Moon? – Because Mars had migrated and moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth has a greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth Position– so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II. The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
III. Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
IV. Why Mars diameter (and Mass) are decreased through the history? Because of the collisions – Mars diameter lost around ( 4.1 %) (And Mars mass also which causes difficulties for Mars gravitation equation)
V. Mars migration is done Because of The Sun Creation Process
VI. Is there a possibility that Mars will return to its original point (84 mkm)? Yes
VII. Why? Because the Planet orbital distance is defined relative to its diameter (and Mass) Mars now is in the wrong Position- but forced to it because of the sun effect
Conclusion The Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars migration Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The solar system motion analysis (questions and answers)Gerges francis
The Solar System Motion Analysis (Questions and Answers)
Abstract
Paper objective
- This paper contains 5 questions and their answers concerning the solar system motion analysis
The Questions Are:
- Question no. (1). Why should The solar Planets Data Analysis be considered a basic tool in the solar system motion research? (page no. 2)
- Question no. (2) Can far planets (as Jupiter and Uranus) effect on the Earth moon motion? (page no. 5)
- Question no. (3) Can the classical mechanics explain the solar system motion? (page no. 14)
- Question no. (4) How The Sun Is Created? (page no. 18)
- Question no. (5) Why couldn't Titius Bode Law predict Neptune’s orbital distance? (page no. 34)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Motion Analysis (Questions and Answers) (III)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper objective
The paper provides (51-97) questions and answers concerns the solar system motion analysis – The questions are:
50- (repeated) How the planets data be created?
51- Are there relativistic effects in the solar system motions?
52- Can 1 second of Mercury Motion be = 9.18 Seconds of Pluto Motion?
53- Why Jupiter orbital circumference = the inner planets orbital circumferences total?
54- Can Uranus Motion Effect On Venus Axial Tilt
55- Why does Jupiter Motion Data Depend On The Rate 1.16
56- Why does the Earth moon regress 19 degrees yearly
57- Why Earth Circumference = the 5 inner planets diameters?
58- Why Bode Law Couldn't Predict Neptune Orbital Distance?
59- Can Uranus effect on the Earth moon motion?
60- Why does the moon create an angle between its displacement direction and its orbital horizontal level?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Motion Analysis (Questions and Answers) (II)Gerges francis
Paper objective
The paper provides (1-50) questions and answers concerns the solar system motion analysis – The questions are:
1- Why do Venus and Uranus rotate on their axes, or spin, in a clockwise direction?
2- Does aether wind exist?
3- What are the major and most effective refutations of Einstein’s Theories of Relativity? Question Asked December 6, 2019.
4- Which is the most convincing physical experiment (Not Thought Experiment) that conclusively validates Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity?
5- The advance of Mercury perihelion is achieved in Newtonian gravity
6- Is Gravity a Push or a Pull?
7- Is our solar system exemplary for all other planetary systems?
8- Life on Mars: Open discussion
9- What do you think about wave-particle duality?
10- Is there somebody who believes in the theory of Everett (multitude of universes)? Do Einstein's Field Equations allow multiple universes?
11- Do the Gravitational force in between two objects depends on the most probable distance in between them?
12- What's underline the Lorentz transformation? And what's the dimension of the space?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Total Solar Eclipse Phenomena proves the following claim.
- The Solar group is one Trajectory of Energy and Each Planet is a point on it
- The Solar group can be similar to one machine and each planet is a gear in this same machine
- The solar group can be similar to one body and each planet is a member in this same body (where the same energy creates all solar planets and their orbital distances, similar to the blood which causes to create all body members)
- Also the solar group is a similar to a great river has many canals where these canals create soils on their banks (the soils are similar to the planets and the canals are similar to the orbital distances)
- The solar planets motions are done in cooperation with each other to perform one job where each planet motion does one task in this same great job
Clearly
The total solar eclipse is done because of a geometrical reason which creates the planets diameters (and even the sun diameter) in geometrical relationships with their distances to enable the total solar eclipse to be occurred
Shortly
No one Solar Planet can be found or move independent from the other planets (even the sun can't be found without the solar planets)
Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon?
Abstract
Paper Question
"Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon?"
Based on what this question is asked? What meaning is behind?
The Earth Moon is created by a direct effect of Jupiter – means – if Jupiter doesn't effect directly on the Earth Moon Creation – the moon should have change in its own data
i.e.
The Earth moon has its own data values (diameter - mass – orbital inclination …etc) this data is created by its Values because of Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon Creation otherwise this data should be changed
Shortly
- If Jupiter didn't effect on the Earth moon creation process – the Earth moon diameter shouldn't be 3475 km and its mass should change from 0.073x 1024 kg also its orbital distance can't be 0.384 mkm and axial tilt should change from 6.7 degrees and its orbital inclination should not be 5.1 degrees ….similar to that, all Earth Moon Data should be changed…
- The next question is – Why Jupiter did effect on the Earth Mon Creation? This question is out of this paper scope – here we try to prove that – the Earth Moon Data is created by its values just because of Jupiter effect on it.
- How to prove this claim – I use The Planets Data Analysis Direction as a method of astrophysics research to prove this fact –
(The Planets Data Direction Method is explained in the paper methodology)
Paper Contents
2- Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon Creation?
3- Mars Migration Theory Revision
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper question
How Does The Gravity work?
The Question Explanation
- The motion at distance is one basic question still needs a sufficient answer.
- The mass gravity concept gives us no geometrical mechanism or any explanation concerns the gravity works mechanism, so we don't know if the gravity needs time or works immediately, or if the gravity causes the space to be formed in some geometrical form to perform the gravity effect.
- We have only the word (gravity) which means, some mass will cause another mass to be moving at distance but no details how this motion is done …
- Venus and Saturn motions data gives some reference that these 2 planets motions depend on one another.
- How Venus and Saturn motions can be performed depending on each other? Whatsoever the answer is, it means, (some effect at distance) is found between these 2 planets.
- Can this effect be a reason for the motion at distance which we search for?
The paper analyzes the 2 planets motions data to see if such effect can be found between the 2 planets and How this effect can be transported from one planet to another?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Cycle 2737 Years Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Cycle 2737 years depends on Metonic Cycle,
Metonic Cycle is produced by an effect of Uranus Motion on the Earth Moon motion.
Mercury, Venus and Saturn be effected by Uranus motion effect on the moon motion. As a result these 3 planets create the Cycle 2737.
Paper objective
- The Paper provides my claim against Nobel Prize Decision for Physics 2021
Paper hypothesis explanation
- In December 2012, many sites referred to some new astronomical phenomenon be repeated one time each 2737 years. The 3 planets (Mercury, Venus and Saturn) be in parallel above the 3 great pyramids heads in Egypt – this interesting event be occurred while the Mayan calendar be ended its long cycle (more than 5000 years)
- Some people expected great earthquake during December 2012, but nothing be occurred. Some people told that they recorded the event of the cycle (2737) and other people claimed that the event is not true.
- I have searched after a theoretical method to know if this cycle is a real one. This is an interesting approach because it answers why the cycle be done? For example we don't know why Earth has a cycle of 4 years (1461 days). That makes this approach is a rich method in discussion and analysis
- The research conclusion I have written in a hypothesis form. Metonic Cycle be produced by Uranus Motion Effect on the moon motion.
- This conclusion be supported by the fact, Uranus Orbital Distance = 19.2 Earth Orbital Distance. And if Uranus and Earth move by equal velocities, Earth would revolve around the sun 19.2 revolutions (years) while Uranus revolve around the sun one revolution only – while Metonic Cycle be 19 years – the equal values (19 and 19.2) give some confidence that Uranus motion caused Metonic Cycle
- This conclusion is the paper discussion cornerstone. Because it disproves Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity. Newton theory is an imaginary idea and no planet moves by the sun gravity. Because of that, The planets motions data and features contradict Newton Theory of The sun gravity.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Paper provides many questions to deepen the theory discussion
Basically
We try here to analyze the main concept that
"Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion"
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
Uranus and Neptune are perpendicular on Saturn level
i.e. Saturn Orbital Distance locates at horizontal level with all planets (Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn) – let's call it (Saturn level)
Uranus and Neptune are on vertical level related to Saturn level - let's call it ( Uranus level)
So Uranus level is perpendicular on Saturn level
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
mrwaheid@gmail.com
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory Gerges francis
Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
- Where
- Planet Motion Features Prove Light Motion Effect On Planet Motion.
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- Many new features are discovered in the solar planets motions among which:
- (1) The Solar Planets Move One Unified General Motion
- (2) The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates of Time
- (3) The Solar system Distances Be Created In A Network Form
- (4) The Solar Planets Motions Data Be Used Mutually Among Planets
- The previous features disprove Planet Motion Independency Concept inherited by Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity- the features simply gives us a different vision about the solar system motion.
- Instead of the rigid body moving by the sun mass gravity independently from other rigid bodies in creation and motion data, The Solar Planet be a similar to a point on one trajectory of energy. where the solar planets move together one unified motion as train carriages transporting among the planets the motion with the rates of time making the solar system as a great Clock its input one motion creates (one second) and its output another motion creates (one solar day).
- And the 2 motions depend on one another as 2 gears in one machine of gears.
- Can this vision be a fact?
- I claim Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity is created out of imagination basically because the sun is created after all planets creation and motion.
- How can I prove my idea against Newton theory?
- By Planets Motions Data Analysis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Jupiter Has A Cycle Of 8 Days (II) (Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis:
Planet day period is defined depends on other planets motions
Paper objective:
The paper discuss if this fact supports the hypothesis (Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion)
Paper contents
1- Planet Velocity And Diameter Relationship
2- Planet Day Period Definition
3- The Moon Day Period Discussion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Is Saturn The Last Planet Created In The Solar System (II)Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
Saturn Is The Last Planet Created In The Solar System
We complete our discussion about this hypothesis which we have started in the paper
Is Saturn The Last Planet Created In The Solar System?
The Idea Summary
- Saturn Data Is Similar To Other Planets Data – for example – Saturn Orbital Distance = Mars Orbital Circumference
- This data refers to that –Saturn may be created after Mars Creation (or vice versa) – but = because Saturn data depends on different planets data – for example – Saturn Diameter = Venus Circumference x π - So such data leads to the conclusion that Saturn may be created after all other planets – means – Saturn is the last planet created in the solar system
- Based on this claim we have 2 questions to discuss
o (1st Question) Can Any Planet Data Be Created Depending On Any Other Planet Data?
o (2nd Question) why Saturn data is created by these specific values? For example – Saturn orbital distance = Mars orbital circumference – based on that – I claim Saturn orbital distance is created depending on Mars orbital circumference – the question is – why? why Saturn doesn't any other planet orbital circumference? Why specially used Mars orbital circumference? And generally – if Saturn data is crated based on some planets data why Saturn used these specific planets data and other's
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time (Revised)Gerges francis
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time (Revised)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
Paper Hypothesis Explanation
- The planets motions rates of time be defined by using ONE RULE
- Based on the planets motions rates of time, the planets orbital periods and distances be defined. means,
- Based on this One Rule, the solar planets orbital periods and distances be defined.
- If the solar planets motions be independent from one another, how their orbital periods and distances be defined based on one rule only?
- The paper provides a proof that, the planets motions use different rates of time which proves that, the solar planets move one unified general motion. means,
- The solar planets motions be integrated with one another and created one unified general motion, because of that, the planets motions need to use different rates of time to enable their motions to be integrated into one unified general motion.
- This fact changes the solar system description inherited from Newton theory of the sun mass gravity. The solar planets be similar to carriages in one train move together one unified motion. also the solar group can be similar to a mechanical clock, and the planets be similar to the gears of this clock. Each gear does one motion (and creates one rate of time) and these motions be integrated into one unified gnarl motion (and the rates of time be integrated into one unified general rate of time)
Paper objectives
- The paper provides the rule based on which all solar planets orbital periods and distances be defined, and test all planets motions data to prove that, no planet motion contradicts this rule.
- The paper tries to answer the question (why the solar planets use different rates of time) by providing The Solar System Creation And Motion Theory.
- The paper is divided into 2 parts.
- (1st Part) Provides the rule and its proves discussion
- (2nd Part) Provides The Solar System Creation And Motion Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Does Earth Velocity Causes The Eclipse Phenomena? (T.S. Eclipse III) Gerges francis
Why We See the Sun Disc = the Moon Disc? (T.S. Eclipse II)
Total Solar Eclipse Analysis (Part I)
In this paper we ask does Earth velocity effects on total solar eclipse?
We deal here with the velocity and not the motion
That means
The question can be as following:
If Earth moves by different velocity, can that effect on the eclipse phenomena?
Let's think ….
Why the total solar eclipse is occurred? Because the moon moves between the sun and Earth…! It's NOT Enough….
Venus moves between the sun and Earth but doesn't cause any solar eclipse…. The point here that we see the sun disc = the moon disc…. That's why when the moon moves between the sun and Earth that creates solar eclipse….
Why we see the moon disc = the sun disc? We have discussed that in (part II)
Here we deal with new question…
If Earth velocity changes, does it effect on the solar eclipse?
Let's think
The total solar eclipse is a process done by 3 players (Earth, moon and the sun). to put the three planets on the same straight line we need some configuration between the 3 planets motions to produce the angle 180 degrees between the 3 players…
So Earth velocity is a player which faces the 2 other players… any velocity change may effect on the eclipse geometrical structure but to perform the eclipse event the three players have to cooperate with each other…
The Concept (Cooperation And Integration)
This concept is what I try frequently to explain and prove.
Without the cooperation and integration between the planets the solar group can't be found or even can't be created…! The cooperation is the source of life .....etc
The Gravity Origin Theory
The Planets Data Analysis Suggests The Following Theory:
-The Solar System Is Created Originally By A Light Motion
-The Light Motion Is The Distance Creator And Energy Provider
-The Planet Is A Point Follows The Light Motion Through The Same Distance And Receives The Available Energy
-The planet matter is created as a function of the planet motion and because of that the planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, orbital inclination, axial tilt …etc….and all the planet data is created to be in harmony and consistency with the planet motion, That because the motion is found before the matter creation and the matter is created to be in harmony with this motion – for that reason the planet (matter) data is in harmony with this planet motion
-The matter is found based on its motion – that means – the motion was found before the matter creation
-The matter is found based on its motion and because of that the matter will be perished if the motion is finished
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Did Lorentz Ask (How The matter is Created)Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
Lorentz believed, The matter is created out of light, or at least, the matter is created by an effect of Light velocity.
The Question Explanation
- There are 2 basic proves for the paper hypothesis which are:
- Lorentz Transformation Equations
- Lorentz Space Mechanical Features
- The paper argues, because Lorentz believed, the matter is created out of light, the transportation of energy among matters be a basic feature.
- The transportation of energy among matters can be used in another form. (A motion transportation among the solar planets)
- The motion transportation among the solar planets is a massive important process because it may explain how the motion at distance is done.
- The masses gravity theory gives us no geometrical mechanism by which a mass can cause another mass motion. Also we can't attribute any mechanical features to the space which transports the gravity effect from one mass to another.
- The paper provides a proof that, Venus Motion Data is transported to Saturn and used as Saturn motion data.
- By that, the paper shows, Some Transportation of (DATA) be done between the 2 planets which may prove (A Motion Is Transported Among The Solar Planets)
- The motion transportation among the planets (if be proved) will be a suitable solution to answer the question (how the motion at distance is done?) and also will be supported by Lorentz studies and equations…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
My Research Hypotheses
Abstract
During 2013-2019 I have studied the solar system geometry. Based on this study I have formed the following 5 basic hypotheses:
Hypothesis No.1
Solar System is One building (or one machine) and each planet is a part of this same building.
Hypothesis No.2
Solar System moves as a train. i.e. A train moves with all its carriages together, similar to that – Solar Planets move together as one train in one unified motion (i.e. No Planet moves individually or independently from other planets motions)
Hypothesis No.3
Planet motion for 1 solar day depends on energy of light motion for 1 second period – that means – Planet moves following light motion – i.e. – Planet motion shows double motions – (1st) Light Motion (2nd) Its Follower Planet Motion
Hypothesis No.4
Solar System Unified Motion depends On Solar Day Period
Hypothesis No.5
Matter Creation process depends on solar day period of time – that means – Matter creation process depends on the time as one of its main components
In this paper I try to explain these 5 hypotheses and provide short proves for them
Why Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance?Gerges francis
Why Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance?
Best regards
When I have discovered that..
Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance
I have asked Why? But the usual answer was ……
It's Pure coincidence….!
Later I have discovered more equalities….As the following:
1. Saturn Orbital Distance = Mars Orbital Circumference = Pluto Eccentricity distance = Saturn Uranus Distance = 1433.5 million km
2. Mercury Saturn Distance = Neptune Pluto Distance = 1375 million km
3. Saturn Pluto Distance = Mercury Neptune Distance = 4436.5 million km
Then I have asked again… why These Distances Are Equal? Is there a geometrical reason behind?…but the usual answer always be …. " Pure Coincidences"
The question wasn't so simple and the answer was mentioned…. I ask clearly… are the solar planets members in the same body? or parts in the same building?- shortly are the solar group as the human hand and the fingers are similar to the planets? means the planets are created and moving depending on each other because all of them consist one machine –one body –one building – one geometrical structure – means the planets aren't separated from each other– but connected with each other.
(that means the space between the planets is a method to connect each planet with others and not to separate each planet from the others)…. This is my question aim!
And the current theory understood that clearly…
And told also a clear answer … that
Any solar planet is separated from the others - each planet is found and move independently..
So the two visions are clear before our eyes ……And the fighting is clear also….
The Solar Group Classical Vision: tells us that… the planet is created independently and move by gravity with the sun without effect of the other solar planets….
My Suggested Vision Is:
The Solar Group is one body – one machine – one building – one geometrical structure – No Planet can be found or move independently from the other planets …. Even the sun herself can't be found without the solar planets… we deal here with one machine – one geometrical structure- so if this geometrical structure has many elements we should be wise enough to see that these elements are members in the same geometrical structure and this structure is found by the cooperation and integration of his members…..
We should fight to prove that we are correct and the current theory is mistaken… Please read the argument…
Jupiter Orbital Distance Proves, We See Wrongly The Solar Group,Gerges francis
This paper tries to prove the following hypothesis:
Hypothesis No. (1)
- Jupiter Is The Solar Group Central Point
- Jupiter Orbital Distance contradicts the solar group current description
Hypothesis No. (2)
- Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Can't Be An Ellipse
- Earth Moon motion effects on our vision and force us to see Planet Motion Trajectory as an ellipse (which is a wrong vision)
The Solar Group Geometry Analysis (Questions & Answers) (Part I)Gerges francis
The Solar Group Geometry Analysis (Questions & Answers) (Part I)
This Paper claims the following:
- The Solar group current Description and theory are incorrect and insufficient
- The Solar group current Description and theory contradicts the solar planet data geometrical analysis.
In this paper we discuss 6 questions with their answers which can show and prove the solar group current theory and description weakness and insufficiently…
The Questions Are In Following:
1- How The Planet Diameter Is Created?
2- How The Planet Orbital Distance Is Defined? By Gravity Force …is it True?
3- What's The Most Near Distribution For The Solar Planets Order?
4- Why Earth moves Daily A Distance = The Moon Orbit Circumference?
5- Why The Light Velocity Is The Universe Highest Velocity?
6- Can The Planet Mass be created independently from the other planets masses?
A Solar Group Suggested Description:
1- The Solar Group is One Geometrical Structure or one building and each planet is a part of this same building- i.e. Each Planet is created to be a complementary to the other planets and No solar planet is created or move independently
2- The solar group can be similar to one trajectory of Energy and each planet is a point on this same trajectory.
3- Also the solar group can be similar to one body, and each planet is a member in this same body.
4- Also, The solar group can be similar to one machine each planet is a gear in this same machine… so the machine works as one group.. that means the cooperation and integration between the solar planets data is the main base on which the solar group is created and move.
How to understand that?
WE know that the matter is created of Energy (E=mc2) – but How The Space Is Created? I suppose that the Space is created of Energy also… (Space = Energy)
So the matter and space both are created from the same energy..
Can that be possible?
The Energy has different forms (sun rays – nuclear interactions – oil- food ..etc)
Different forms for the same content….
So it's possible to create matter and space of the same energy…
I have another example to support that…
In double slit experiment (Young Experiment) – the light coherence produced bright and dark fringes –regardless the theoretical explanation – the experiment tells "when one input is used(light)– outputs can be in 2 different forms (bright and dark fringes)"
The Solar Group Creation
I suppose the solar group is one energy creates the planet matter and orbital distance – so this same energy passes through the whole group to create all solar planets and their orbital distances from the same energy where this energy creates all planets data depending on each other because all of them are created from the same source.
Shortly
The solar group is one thread – as one necklace – all solar planets and their distances are created from one energy to be complementary to each other- and that's why the planets data analysis show the solar planets dependency.
The sun obliquity disproves newton theory of the sun mass gravityGerges francis
The Sun Obliquity Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The sun obliquity on ecliptic (7.25 degrees) proves that, Earth Is Found Before The Sun Creation.
The Hypothesis Explanation
- The paper hypothesis tries to disprove Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity.
- While Newton told us, The Sun Is The Planet Motion Reason, the paper hypothesis tells, Earth is found and moving before the sun creation. as a result, we conclude that, Earth Motion Doesn't Depend On The Sun.
- This conclusion be valid for all solar planets. Means, Newton Theory of The sun mass Gravity is mistaken.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Paper Claim
The Solar Group Is One Body
The Claim Explanation & Features
1- The Solar Group is One Building And Each Planet Is A Part Of This Same Building ….Or
2- The Solar group is One Trajectory of Energy And Each Planet Is A Point On This Same Energy Trajectory…. Or
3- The Solar Group Is One Machine And Each Planet Is A Gear In It… Or
4- The Solar Group Is A Great River And Each Planet Is A Canal of this same river
5- The solar group has One Great Job which is divided into integrated tasks for each planet has one task which should be integrated and cooperated with other planets tasks to perform the General One Great Job….
i.e.
6- Each Planet Data (Diameter- Mass- Orbital Distance -…. etc) is created to be suitable for this planet required task in the whole building and No Solar Planet Single Data Can Be Created Independently
That leads to this paper main hypothesis, let's refer to it in following…
A Hypothesis:-
"The Solar Planet Data Is Created Based On Geometrical And Physical Reasons"
The previous hypothesis provides us 3 results:
1- The Solar Group Is One Building
2- The Solar Planets Motions Harmony Is Found Based On The Planet Construction & Formulation (Planet Data) And Not By The Gravity Forces
3- Any Planet Data Can Be Deduced From The Other Planets Data Analysis
Direction Of Energy Through The Solar Group Gerges francis
- The Solar Group Main Energy is sent from Jupiter to Pluto – This energy sending is continued for 2 sequence solar days
- Neptune used Jupiter Sent Energy consuming 16% of this total energy and the rest of Energy Neptune reflected it toward the inner planets into 2 Energy Trajectories.
o 1st Trajectory is sent to Earth (will be discussed Point No.4)
o 2nd Trajectory is sent to Mercury
- The 1st Trajectory of Energy is reached to Earth (with 86400mkm) – Where Earth reflected this energy into 2 new parts
o Part 1 the energy is sent from Earth to Venus
o Part 2 the energy is sent from Earth to (Jupiter & Uranus)
- The total energy (90000mkm) proves that all energy gathered together on one point only and no contradiction is found…
This explanation shows that the energy passes in cycle through the solar group
The previous idea supports my claim:
- The Solar Group is One Trajectory Of Energy and each planet is appoint on this same energy trajectory….. or
- The Solar Group is One Geometrical Structure or one building and each planet is a part of this same geometrical structure (building)- i.e. Each planet data is created to be suitable for the required task of this planet in the whole building …..and
- No solar planet can be found or move independently
a. Also the solar group can be similar to one body, and each planet is a member in this same body. All solar planets and their orbital distances are created by the same energy (by the same blood all body members are created)
b. Or, The solar group be similar to one machine each planet is a gear in this same machine… so the machine job depends on the gears different tasks.. and that means the cooperation and integration between the solar planets data is the main base on which the solar group is created and move.
How the Solar Group is Created? (Discussion No. 1) Gerges francis
This Paper provides our first try to answer the question…
How The Solar Group Is Created?
Here we'll try to prove The Following Arguments:
1- The Solar Group is One Geometrical Structure or one building and each planet is a part of this same geometrical structure (building)- i.e. Each planet data is created to be suitable for the required task of this planet in the whole building and No solar planet can be found or move independently
a. Also the solar group can be similar to one body, and each planet is a member in this same body. All solar planets and their orbital distances are created by the same energy (by the same blood all body members are created)
b. OR, The solar group be similar to one machine each planet is a gear in this same machine… so the machine job depends on the gears different tasks.. and that means the cooperation and integration between the solar planets data is the main base on which the solar group is created and move.
c. Also, The solar group can be similar to a great river has many canals and these canals created soils on their banks. The river, canals and their soils all of them are created from the same water (the same energy)
The previous claim and conclusion is discussed in this paper strongly and the paper provides curial proves to show this fact as clear as the sun herself.
2- Saturn is The Most Important Planet in the solar group and he connects the group together where without Saturn the solar group can't be found or move.
3- Mars current existence and motion depends on Earth Moon Orbit.
Solar System Geometry (Summarized Discussion) Gerges francis
Solar System Geometry (Summarized Discussion)
The Solar Group Geometrical Basic Features:
1- The Solar Group is One Trajectory of Energy and Each Planet is A point on it
2- The sun light is produced by accumulation of planets motions energies and transformation the mechanical waves into light waves
3- Solar Planets Data are created relative to each other
4- There Are relativistic effects in the solar group
5- The unit definition is relative and can change according to the observer situation
This paper discusses and tries to prove the previous features
The moon indeed moves by gravity (iii) (explanation)Gerges francis
Paper hypotheses
- Light Motion For 1 Second causes Planet Motion For 1 Solar Day (my research 5th hypothesis)
- Planet Matter is created as a result of Planet motion
- Solar system matters are created by planet motion for 2 Solar Days
- Saturn orbital distance is the required distance to be passed by the solar system unified motion during 1 solar day ("The Train Motion Concept")
- Uranus orbital distance is the required distance to be passed by the solar system unified motion during 2 Solar Days
- That explains the theoretical reason behind Uranus and Saturn strong relationship
Kepler 3rd law explanation (a claim against nobel prize board decision in ph...Gerges francis
A claim against Nobel Prize Board Decision – in Physics -2018
Best Greetings
I send this paper as a claim to the Nobel Prize Decision Board - for their decision - for Nobel Prize in physics 2018
Of course I have nothing against the great people who receive the Nobel Prize in Physics 2018 and I congratulate them for their great works
But at my side, I found there's a serious question here
Because I explained frequently in my research that, there's a serious contradiction in physics current theories and we can't understand the solar group geometry if no one solves this contradiction…
I Provided many hard arguments to prove this claim and thought that, the Nobel Prize Board will support me to solve this contradiction in physics.
But I found the Board decision avoids my work!
For that reason I summarized the main idea in this paper and send it as a claim to the Nobel Prize Decision Board
And I wish the board will accept to give me a chance to explain and defend my point of view..
With the Best Regards
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
All my papers
http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous
Why Don't We Understand The Solar System Geometry?Gerges francis
Why don't We Understand The Solar System Geometry?
Because
Paper Hypothesis
- The Planets Motions are Motions of Light Beams, That means each planet motion depends on a motion of light beam – Based on that, we have to use the light geometry to explain the solar planets motions.
Shortly
- Planet Motion = Light Motion and should be studied under Relativistic Considerations
- Because we see the planets as matters move by low velocity– We consider that the light geometry is unsuitable science to explain the solar planets motions.
- That's Why – There Are Many Contradictions In The Solar Planets Motions Current Understanding And Description..
Paper Objective
- The Paper tries to prove the claim that
"The Solar Planets Motions Are Motions Of Light Beams"
The Paper Argument
1-The 3 inner Planets (Mercury – Venus & Earth) were created by Jupiter effect
2-Mars Is Exceptional In Its Creation
3-Jupiter orbital circumference is created based on the inner planets orbital circumferences (i.e. there's a mutual effect between Jupiter and the inner planets)
4-The inner planets & Jupiter can't define the sun position in the sky relative to their orbital circumferences
5-Jupiter and the inner planets depend on Saturn to define the sun position relative to their orbital circumferences (Through Mars Effect)
6-Saturn depends on Uranus to define the sun position in the sky
7-Uranus Is The First Planet Created Relative To The Sun
8-The Basic Connection Between Jupiter And The Inner Planets depends On Venus, Where Jupiter Venus Relationship shows an effect on the sun creation.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Research 1st hypothesis discussion (ii) (revised)Gerges francis
Hypothesis No.1
Solar System is One building (or one machine) and each planet is a part of this same building.
Paper Main Question
Why Does Uranus Orbital Distance = Saturn Orbital Diameter?
(Why does Saturn orbital distance = Saturn Uranus distance?)
Space Definition and Features
- Solar Planets are theater of puppets connecting by one trajectory of energy.
- Space is Energy and created as a result of light motion
- Uranus Orbital Distance is the solar system first distance created as a result of light motion for 1 second (1 second of light motion is equivalent to 1 solar day of planet motion – 3rd hypothesis)
- Saturn Orbital Distance is a defined distance by the solar system motion per a solar day
- Uranus and Saturn orbital distances are produced by one motion done in the same period of time by Earth Moon Effect.
- Earth Moon has no this great energy to effect on Saturn and Uranus orbital distances, but Earth Moon is the solar system general energy indicator and he defines where the energy will pass –that shows his effect secret.
Planets Data Analysis Curriculum
1- Define And Discover The Directed Data
2- Suggest a hypothesis to explain how this directed data is created (the new hypothesis should depend on old hypotheses in one feature at least).
3- Provide other data arranged according to this new hypothesis to prove its credibility
4- Conclude the geometrical rule based on which the mentioned data is created
5- The concluded geometrical rules form the general geometrical design
6- Use all hypotheses to form one general hypothesis.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Planet Diameter & Orbital Distance Relationship (A Theoretical Analysis)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper Hypotheses
(1)
There's A Relationship Between Planet Orbital Distance And Its Diameter.
(2)
- Human vision and realization process effects on the universe around
- The Matter is created as an effect of human mind on the universe around – Matter has no real existence.
i.e.
- Matter is created based on Human Vision (And Realization Process)- which depends on the distance – that explains why there's a relationship between planet diameter and orbital distance.
- There's no a proved relationship between planet orbital distance and its mass (In Planets Data) because the mass can't be measured by a vision
- That explains Planet diameter and orbital distance relationship reason
- That makes many of physics laws around us are rooted in human mind knowledge and realization process which explains why Planets move according to physics laws and not simply in chaos.
Shortly
- Human mind is a player in solar group geometry and without discovering of its geometrical role –the solar group geometry will be obscure forever
Paper Hypothesis
The Universe Is A Continuum
Explanation
Question no. 1
If the universe is a continuum why that disprove the big bang concept?
Because – in this case – the universe will no longer be created by some random process otherwise it can't be a continuum – to be a continuum its components should be created complementary to each other to consist together one continuum
Question no. 2
Why does the Special theory of relativity prove that the universe is a continuum?
Einstein told that Space-time is a continuum but he didn't tell that the universe is a continuum- Space-time is coordinates consist one continuum because it's coordinates –means – the time and distance values are defined by the point position in space-time – So when Einstein told the Space-time is a continuum he didn't effect on the universe geometry itself – he simply provided a new geometry to define the coordinates
But
When we accept the hypothesis that – the universe is a continuum - that means -we accept that the particle properties are defined by coordinates!
Specifically – that means – Particle Mass will be defined as time and distance in the space-time coordinates! But particle mass is a particle property and can't be defined by any coordinates! We have 2 different visions here!
But … in fact ....the particle high velocity motion changes its time, length and MASS
So, simply if the mass can be added to the space-time and defined as particle coordinates – so the special theory of relativity disproves the big bang theory
Otherwise –it can't …. In this paper I try to prove that – practical mass is defined as distance & time values – all of them are space-time coordinates – that proves the hypothesis – the universe is a continuum – and disproves the big bang theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Doesn't Move By The Sun Mass Gravity Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
- The solar system is created out of one light beam its velocity (1.16 mkm/sec), and moves depending on this light beam motion, And
- The light (1.16 mkm/sec) created the solar system distances in a network form.
The hypothesis explanation
- The existence proves of light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) depend on the solar system distances network proves.
- Because
- The solar system distances be created depending on each other by using the light motion that caused the distances to be created in a network form, or based on one geometrical design.
- Where (Distance = Energy). The distances creation process needed energy which is provided by light motion. by that, light energy be registered in the created distances, and by analysis of the distances values we can conclude that these distances be created by energy provided by a light beam. And also we can discover this light beam velocity be (1.16 mkm/s) because this light beam energy and motion features are registered in the created distances.
Paper objective
- The paper proves the solar system distances network and based on this proof, the paper proves the light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) existence.
Paper Conclusion
- Because the solar system be created out of light supposed velocity (=1.16mkm/s) and the sun light velocity (= 0.3 mkm/s)
- Means, the light (0.3mkm/)be created as a side product from the original one (1.16 mkm/s)
- That proves
- The Sun Is Created After All Solar Planets Creation And Motion Which Disproves Decisively Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Sun Is The Solar System Last Created Piece (Newton Was Wrong) (Revised)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity Be Refuted Decisively By 2 Facts Which Are:
- (1st Fact) The Sun Is Created After All Solar Planets Creation And Motion.
- (2nd Fact) The Solar Planets Move A Type Of Motion Different Completely From The Planet Motion Be Described By Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity.
Paper Proves
- The (2nd Fact) is proved by The Solar Planets Motions Analysis.
- While Newton had supposed that, Each planet moves independently from the other planets. The fact is that, the planets motions be integrated into one unified general motion. by that, The Planets Motions Be similar to The Train Carriages Motion. or similar to A Machine Of Gears Motion.
- The Planets Motions Data Analysis disproves the Motion Independency Concept, showing that, the planets motions be different completely from Newton Motion Description.
- The (1st Fact) which is (The Sun is Created after all Planets Creation and Motion). This Fact disproves Newton Theory decisively. This fact proves are discussed in this paper introduction.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar Planets Motions Description (Revised)Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
The Solar Planets Motions Create One Unified General Motion.
The Hypothesis Explanation
- The hypothesis tells the planets motions be similar to Train Carriages Motion
- Also the planets motions be similar to Chess Pieces Motions
- The hypothesis discovers One Law controls the solar system motion and data.
- The planets unified general motion forces each planet motion to be complementary with other planets motions to perform The Unified General Motion. as a result, The Planet motion be An Obligatory Motion.
- Based on that, The Solar Planet Can't Change Its Motion.
- The Solar Planet creates its data to be in consistency with its motion.
- Because, the planet can't change its motion, but can change its data to be in consistency with its motion. and because of that, the planet data be created in consistency with its motion.
- Because the planet motion be complementary with other planets motions.
- The planet data be created complementary with other planets data
- Based On This Vision
- The solar planets data be created based on One Geometrical Design.
- And
- The Planets Creation And Motions Data Be Controlled By One Equation Only
- The paper hypothesis gives a different vision from the solar planets classical description. because its tells that, (The Solar Planet Data Be Created Based On Geometrical Calculations And Rules). The classical description tells planets data be created by random process and without geometrical reasons behind.
- The Planets Unified General Motion proves discussion shows that, the hypothesis tells the fact.
Paper Main Question
- Can The Planets Motions By Masses Gravity Forces Create The Planets Unified General Motion?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Similar to Observation vs data analysis as astrophysics research method (20)
2012 Phenomenon Has Told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon).pdfGerges francis
Best greetings –
2012 Phenomenon has told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The sun is a phenomenon created by the planets motions – means - the sun is not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays but the sun rays be created by Planets Motions Energies total- As a result – the sun is created after all planets creation and motion which disproves Newton theory of the sun gravity where no planet moves by the sun gravity –
The hypothesis explanation
The sun creation as a phenomenon depends on the planets motions energies shows a great gab between the solar system motion description and the real facts of this motion –for that reason – I provide 2 more points to confirm this gab existence while the 2 points be less strange in meaning can prove clearly this gab is found deeply in the description– not only for the sun rays source of energy but also for the basic ideas of the solar system motion.
(Point No. I)
The Mass Gravity Force Can't Cause The Solar System Motion
The planet moves by the force which caused its creation otherwise this planet will be broken by its motion because 2 forces affect on it- Newton Is Wrong In Logic – But –
I wish to move beyond this point –because – I refuse generally the mass gravity force using as a reason for the solar system motion – the idea is wrong in concept –
Basically because
The mass gravity force is so limited force in range and can't provide the solar system motion features – we need one more powerful and intelligent force – the eclipse phenomenon may help this explanation –the force which created the planets diameters in proportionality with specific distances – and the sun diameter be used also in this process- the force considers each planet motion and velocity – thinking about the whole process to produce the total solar eclipse by many players their creation data be created for this purpose.
Usually the total solar eclipse be considered as pure coincidence result and the beauty of geometry be removed- the paper analyzes the eclipse geometrical data to show a small part of the beauty –
Can the mass gravity poor concept do that? the description Newton told can explain how the matter be created? or how is planet data created? why is the moon diameter =3475 km? because if it be 5000 km the whole geometry will be changed….
The moon creation can help to see another part of this force beauty – the moon be created by planets collision but the moon diameter be created based one exact equations – means- the force works geometrically even through the collisions
In fact
This idea also shows the gab between the solar system facts and the current theory because – while – the current description supposes the planets data be created by random process, initial conditions and unknown historical factors that fact is that the planets data be created based on exact equations
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Rays Production Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Rays Energy Source Is The Planets Motions Energy – means- The Sun Is Not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays – instead – the planets motions energies total be used to create the sun rays.
The hypothesis explanation
I- The Sun Rays Creation Depend On The Relative Motion Concept
This point provides the method by which the sun rays be created – the rays creation depend on the relative motion – that means- we need to find 2 motions in the solar system move relative one another and the different velocity between the 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
Regardless – this is possible or not – our job be defined clearly –
We need 2 motions move relative one another and the different velocity between these 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
II- Can We Attribute Mechanical Features For The Space?
Here we try to produce the 2 relative motions –
(Let's suppose the sun isn't found but the planets still revolve around its space point)
We have to attribute mechanical features for the space – let's do that in following
We suppose the space be similar to a sea water and the planet be similar to a stick moves perpendicularly through the sea water – this is similar to – a spoon turns water in a vessel - the spoon motion through the water causes a wave in the water –
The theory supposes the planet motion causes a wave in the space –
let's use this hypothesis in our analysis…
Mercury revolves around the sun (point) with velocity 47.4 km/sec – how to see that in our description?
Mercury (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Mercury velocity is 47.4 km/sec and that causes the wave velocity to be (47.4 km/sec)
And -
Venus (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Venus velocity (35 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec = 82.4 km/sec)
And – The Earth moon (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion –the moon velocity (29.8 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec +29.8 = 112.2 km/sec) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is a Phenomenon, Created By The Planets Motions Energies (revised).pdfGerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets distribution between the sun and Pluto depends on one design – this design uses the distance 90000 million km as a distance unit.
The hypothesis explanation
The hypothesis tells – the planets distribution uses one design and this one design gives a chance for the planets to make their distances total equal 90000 million km for a unit period of time – there's a necessity to use this distance we explain here.
The data shows 2 facts
(1st Fact) One Map (One Design) Controls The Planets Distribution Between The Sun And Pluto –
(2nd Fact) This One Design Uses The Distance 90000 Million Km As A Unit
Paper first question
Why does the solar system design use the distance 90000 million km as a unit?
Let's answer in following…
If (c =300000 km/sec = light velocity) how can we measure the value (c2)?
Let's suppose we use the value (c2) for one second – how can we measure it?
In this case the value (c2) will be = 90000 million km
Now
The hypothesis tells, the planets motions aim to pass this distance (90000 million km) and to use this distance based on A Motion For A Period Of Time = One Second
(We Discover In The Paper Discussion How This Motion Can Be Created)
As a result –
The distance 90000 million km will be a equivalent to the value (c2)
And
The value (c2) is the source of energy from which the sun rays be created.
Based on that
The Sun Rays Be Created By The Planets Motions Energies Total
Means,
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion - Instead – the planets motions energies total be accumulated and be used as energy source to produce the sun rays- then the sun disc and body be created from the sun rays energy.
And
Because the planets motions aim to create the sun rays they aim to pass the required distance 90000 million km and the solar system design causes this distance to be used by a motion depends on one second
Paper second question
Can Light Beam Be Produced By Matters Relative Motion?
The planets motions distances total per solar day (=17.75 million km)
(This distance contains the Earth moon velocity which is equal Earth velocity)
During 1461 days the planets motions distances total be =25920 million km
Light (300000 km/s) travels in one day (86400 s) a distance =25920 million km
But the Earth Cycle is (365 +365+365+366 =1461 days)
The idea tells us – if 1461 seconds of the Earth motion = 1 second of the sun motion – the velocities difference between the 2 motions will be= Light Velocity (300000km/s)
The paper discusses how that can be possible- but – here – we discuss the conceptual question- can light beam be created by matters relative motion?
The planets data tells about a new method which is (Motions Use Different Rate Of Time) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
means, Saturn moves by light velocity relative to the sun point –
The hypothesis Proof
The paper hypothesis tells Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
Let's prove that in following
(1)
The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time Where
One hour of Mercury motion be = 24 hours of any planet motion (except Saturn)
One hour of Any Planet motion be = 24 hours of Saturn
These rates of time be proved in the paper discussion.
(2)
Saturn moves a distance =90000 million km in a period = 107470 days
The period 107470 days (of Saturn) = 576 x 186.6 days (Of Mercury)
Means this period (107470 days) be seen on Mercury as (186.6 days)
(3)
The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec –
This total be created relative to the point of space on which the sun will be created –
Means
We suppose the sun isn't found and the planets still revolve around the point of space on which the sun will be created-
Mercury (47.4 km/s) revolves around this point of space and creates a different in velocity with it = (47.4km/s)
Venus (35 km/s) revolves around this point and creates a different in velocity = 47.4km/s + 35km/s =82.4 km/s
The 9 planets velocities total 176 km/s causes to create a different velocity =176 km/s with this point of space
Now
The rate of time be created based on the rate of velocities –means
1day of this point of Space be =176 days of Mercury
(Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s)
But
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = 1.0725 days of the point of space
We know the rate (1.0725) effect on the solar system – for example – this rate effect on 40% of all distances and 60% 0f all planets axial tilts and effect on many other data-
By this rate (1.0725) the period (1.0725 days) will be = one day
Means
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space
But
The solar system creation theory tells– the planets matters and their distances be created from one energy and this energy be provided by one light beam and the planets move with this light beam based on the rate of time (One Second of Light motion be = One Solar day of Planet Motion)
This must be the same rate be used with the space because the matter and space be created together.
As a result
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space =one second of light motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
(1)
The Sun Rays Be Produced By Planets Velocities Total - The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Light (300000 km/sec) travels in one solar day a distance = the solar planets motions distances total in 1461 solar days–
The solar planets velocities total uses this rate of time (1=1461) and produces light velocity (300000 km/sec) from the planets velocities total
(2)
If the solar planets motions can't produce light velocity the solar system would be destroyed.
Paper conclusion
Because the sun rays energy be provided by the planets motions energies total and the planets move in cycles – that necessitates – the sun creation and death depend on a cycle –means- after this sun be dead another sun will be created because the sun is a phenomenon created based on a cycle (as the eclipse)
The hypothesis explanation
(1)
The Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created Out Of One Energy -
This idea can be acceptable simply by the physics book because it's known that the matter and space be created of energies – here – I add one idea only tells that-from the same one energy the planets matters and their distances be created –
The matter and space have different forms spite they be created from the same energy because the creation rules be different for them- as the oil and coal - they be created from the same source but the creation rules be different and the forms be different as a result
The idea causes basic change in the solar system motion description–because –instead of the separated planets as separated points – we deal with one energy which causes to create a continuum of data – by that –the data can be transported among the planets (in fact it does).
The idea doesn't create any new thing– but – it discovers the unjustifiable description for the planets motions – where it be believed that the planets are separated from one another as islands in a sea and no connection can be available – this description is mistaken in concept because the matter is created of energy and the space is created of energy and it's illogical to prevent the contact between them -here – the transportation of data among the planets should be a proved fact depend on the planets motions.
Shortly
The continuum of data of the solar system is a logical fact should be proved, and the separated points description should be considered unjustifiable vision.
A Conclusion
From one energy the planets matters and their distances be created
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is A Phenomenon
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets velocities total be equivalent to light velocity 300000 km/s
The hypothesis explanation
- The Sun Is A Phenomenon Created By The Planets Motions –
- Means-
- The Sun Rays Energy Source Isn't Any Nuclear Interaction Found Inside The Sun – But – The Sun Rays Energy Be Found By The Planets Motions Energies Total
- Shortly
- The Planets Velocities Total Be Used As One Motion Velocity – And This Motion Uses A Rate Of Time To Reach To Light Velocity.
- Let's explain that in details in following…
- (1)
- We need to suppose that (One Hour Of Mercury Motion =24 Hours Of Any Planet Motion) and
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Solar Days Of Saturn Motion)
- These rates of time be proved in the discussion clearly –
- (2)
- The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec – this value be seen in Mercury Data as (176 solar days = Mercury Day Period)
- We conclude that, Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s
- And
- After The Earth Moon Creation, the moon velocity 29.8 km/sec be added to the 9 planets velocities total (176 +29.8 =205.8 km/s)
- The total 205.8 km/s be seen in the moon motion data as (205.8 x π =655.7) (error 1.4%) where (655.7 hours = the moon rotation period)
- That tells the velocities total be seen also in the moon rotation period (a cycle period as Mercury)
- But
- Why for Mercury used (DAYS) but for the moon used (HOURS)??
- Because
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Hours Of The Moon Motion)
- (3)
- The total (205.8 km/s) can create the velocity 300000 km/s only if the rate of time (1=1461) be created – let's see the light velocity creation -
- 300000 km = 205.8s x 9.7 km/s x 24 x 2π
- Let's explain how the light velocity (300000 km/s) be created.
- The planets velocities total (205.8km/s) moves for 1second and passes 205.8 km, this distance be sent from the moon to Saturn in a period form (205.8 seconds)
- But (one hour of any planet motion = 24 hours of Saturn motion) for that reason the period (205.8 s of the moon motion) be equal = (205.8 s x 24) of Saturn motion.
- The rate (2π) be found by the geometrical design
- The data tells, each second Saturn moves, passes a distance =9.7 km but the solar system passes a distance =300000 km
- If the solar system moves (one motion) and uses (one velocity) for this distance (300000 km) for each second - The Solar System Velocity Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) – means – The Planets Velocities Total Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022).pdfGerges francis
Please help (1-9-2022)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022)
National bank of Egypt practice Fraud and Breach of Trust
Because
It refused the judgment issued by The French ministry of Justice and denies the money by judged and disregarded the Foreign Court Judgment.
Sent to the honorable united Nations Secretary – General
António Guterres
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
best Greetings
The Sun Creation Process
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Light Beam Energy The Solar System Be Created
And
This Light Beam travels with 1.16 million km per second
The hypothesis explanation..
- (1)
- The solar system be created out of one light beam energy –
- The solar planets matters and their distances be created of one energy and this one energy be provided by one light beam and this light beam travels with velocity 1160000 km/s –
- Shortly
- The physics book accepts that (matter and space be created of energies)
- The hypothesis adds one idea only tells
- (from the same one energy the solar planets matters and their distances be created) this is the hypothesis main idea –
- Matter and Space creation be done from the same stuff (energy) but by using different geometrical rules –the idea is similar to the creation of the oil and coal both be created from the same source but they have 2 different forms because the creation process depend on 2 different geometrical rules.
- The matter and space creation process can be summarized by the following data
- (light 1.16 million/s = matter + space + light 300000 km/s)
- The data tells the input energy be a light beam its velocity 1160000 km/s, from this energy the matter and space be created and the light known velocity 300000 km/s be created as a side product from the process.
- Briefly
- If we find Matters in the universe – we can't find the light velocity 1160000 km/s because its energy be consumed in the matter and space creation process and produced the known light beam velocity 300000 km/s as a side product.
- Based on this vision
- The matter be a geometrical point found on a trajectory of energy or (on a light beam) – by that – the matter moves by light motion –
- Imagine a rock in a tube form be found in some sea water and the water passes through this rock tube and pushes the rock itself to move with the water-
- That answers the question (how does planet move?) no sun gravity be used here – instead – the planet moves by light motion from its energy the planet be created.
- Here we disprove Newton theory of the sun gravity – because
- By one force the planet be created and moving otherwise this planet will be broken by effect of 2 forces on it – here – the force caused the planet creation is the light beam energy and the force causes the planet motion is this same light beam motion- that explains the safe planet motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
Venus motion effect on the moon motion and causes the moon orbital period to be = the moon rotation period =27.3 days
The hypothesis explanation..
- The hypothesis explanation can be summarized in 3 questions:
- (1) Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (2) By What Equation Planet Diameter Can Be Defined?
- (3) How Can Planet Diameter Equation Change The Solar System Vision?
- Let's try to answer these questions in following…
(1st Question)
Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane or rocket manufacture – the manufacturer needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all specifications, otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period, axial tilt …and all data based on Exact Equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically without observation which prove this fact decisively.
- Then we have to ask (How Planet Data Be Created In Order?)
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves this fact – because – it proves each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2=4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orbital distance
- Example (Venus orbital distance)2= 4 (Mercury orbital distance) x50.3 million km (Venus orbital distance=108.2 million km Mercury orbital distance =57.9 million km)
- This equation be tested and discussed in this paper – but its concept is a clear one – it tells the planets leave an empty space for the new planet – for that reason each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance.
- Logically the new planet can't disturb the current planets positions or motions trajectories – by that –the orbital distance be defined by the neighbors positions –
- (3)
- The new planet has to revolve around the sun based on its orbital distance which be defined obligatorily where no data of this planet be taken into consideration in its orbital distance definition –neither mass nor diameter – instead – the distance be defined based on the neighbor distance.
- But
- Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance – otherwise – this planet will be broken through its motion –
- The function between planet diameter and its orbital distance is the necessary requirement to cause the planet safe motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Vodafone-Egypt Practices a fraud and breach of trust during 2013-2022.pdfGerges francis
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
2013-2022: Egypt authority prevented any job from me and prevented me to travel abroad- They Torture My Mother By Electric Shock And Try To Kill Her By Insulin Injection- they threaten our lives –Please Help
2010-2013: I have studied in Faculty of physics & Math– Physics Department – Peoples Friendship University of Russia – Moscow – Russian Federation.
2013-2022 (Details) - Because I couldn't return to Moscow - I have performed an interesting research in astrophysics- many international physicists interested for it – while Egypt authority realized my research importance they:
(I) torture my mother by electric shocks to force me stop publishing my papers
(II) They practice hacking on my accounts & Telephone Calls (+201022532292).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Petition (with signature) (Egypt Persecution Against The Coptic).pdfGerges francis
Please help
Egypt Authority Persecutes The Coptic -Please Help
EGYPT AUTHORITY TRIES TO KILL MY MOTHER – PLEASE HELP
(Also they force my family to send me to the madhouse)
Because
Egypt Authority tries to STEAL my astrophysics research results, I worked in it since 2013 till now –Egypt authority torture us to steal my research – they hanged many of my accounts and even prevent me to write my research papers by using torture.
(They try to burn my laptop- which is my only source for all my research materials)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
Address /11 Mohamed Rageb st- Madenet El Saada – EL Materiya District – Cairo – Egypt
Planet Diameter Be A Function In Its Rotation PeriodGerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Diameter Be Created As A Function In Its Rotation Period
The hypothesis Explanation
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane manufacture – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight …etc otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its data based on exact equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically prove this fact decisively.
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves each planet orbital distance depends on its previous neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2 = 4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orb. distance
- We test and discuss this equation in the current paper–
- As a result –
- The planet found itself in an obligatory position be defined by other planets data and the planet data itself has no role in its orbital distance definition.
- (3)
- Planet motion can be a dangerous one if this planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance – means- the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken (The mass can decrease planet velocity – but the wrong diameter can break it) – for that reason – the planet has to create its diameter as a function in its orbital distance to move safely.
- But
- If the function has only 2 variables (planet diameter and its orbital distance), If this planet changes its orbital distance for any reason its diameter will be broken as a result –
- The designer had to create the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance as indirect function contains many other variables and by that if the planet changes its orbital distance the other variables will be changed but the diameter will be saved.
- As a result
- Planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance – by that – the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance be created but contains also other variables to protect the diameter.
- My fourth equation proves this fact let's see it
- (4)
- Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
- (v1/v2) = (s/r) =I
- v = Planet Velocity
- r= Planet Diameter
- s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
- I= Planet Orbital Inclination (a rate to inclination unit)
- v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
- we test, discuss and analyze this equation in this current paper.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
-Physics and Mathematics Faculty - Peoples' Friendship university of Russia –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae).pdfGerges francis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae)
My Research Argument
(Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity?)
1-Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – All planet data be created based on exact equations and geometrical rules - No single data be created based on random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
As in a plane or a rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all its specifications and dimensions –
If this plane data be created by inaccurate dimensions, this plane can't fly
Similar to that
Planet moves through the space under physical laws and if its data be not created based on exact equations this planet will be broken through its motion – because – the safe motion necessitates a full harmony between planet data one another and with the physical laws controls the motions through space
In this investigation we try to define how Planet creates its data – or in more accurate words – By What Order Planet Data Be Created? what data be created at first and what be later? – by that – we can discover the harmony original point.
I have discovered 5 equations by which we can conclude planet data theoretically without observation that proves the idea decisively
2- Planet Orbital Distance Be Defined Before Its Creation
This simple fact be proved by 2 basic proves – "First Proof" The Logical Analysis
The current planets positions define the new planet position
The balancing effect of the planets motions forces the new planet to take the left place for it – because the planets revolve around the sun in their trajectories of motions – for that – the new planet has to find a place far from these trajectories.
Imagine you are in some crowded bus – the people pushed you to the last place in this bus because it's the only free place there – you came later and this is the only available place for you – by that – you are forced to accept this place
Planet orbital distance be defined before the planet creation – the logic proves this fact clearly
"Second Proof"
My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
My equation tells– Planet Orbital Distance Depends On Its Neighbor Distance
It's a simple and a trustee equation – let's use Venus as example
(108.2 million km)2 = 4 (57.9 million km) (50.3 million km)
where
108.2 million km = Venus orbital distance and
57.9 million km = Mercury orbital distance and (50.3 = 108.2 -57.9)
(There are 3 exceptions – Earth depends on Mercury – Mars depends on Venus and Pluto depends on Uranus –
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity.pdfGerges francis
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
- (1)
- By one force planet be created and moving – means - the force which created the Planet– it causes its motion – as a result
- (No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity) because (The Sun Had Created No Planet)
- One more force caused the planets creation and their motions
- For that reason
- Planet creation and motion data be in harmony one another –
- For example (Mercury creation and motion data be in harmony one another) and Mercury moves safely and isn't broken
- But -we don't have 9 forces in the solar system – One force for each planet – instead – We have one force only caused All Planets Creation And Motion
- Now- let's ask
- How Can One Force Create 9 Planets And Causes Their Motions?
- This force needs to use One Geometrical Design to do this job – as 9 gears be moving by one motor we need a machine to do this job
- Based on this analysis – No planet moves by the sun gravity – Newton is wrong
- (2)
- The gravitation equation is wrong because no planet orbital distance be defined based on it- and that explains the contradiction between the planets masses order and their orbital distances
- This fact is a powerful against Newton – but the logic still more power
- Because
- The planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation – because – the distance be defined by other planets distances – means - the new planet orbital distance be defined based on the balancing of the current planets motions trajectories and by that the new planet will find itself in a position defined obligatory by other planets –
- This fact be proved also by my first equation which proves that each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance (Not On Its Mass)
- My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
- d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
- (My 5 Equations Be Tested And Discussed In The Paper)
- I want to say
- The principle idea is wrong because the distance be defined obligatory by other planets motions trajectories and planet mass can do nothing to change it
- (3)
- The logic still moves against Newton because
- The planet is found itself in an obligatory position and has to revolve around the sun from this position – now what about this planet diameter – because
- If the planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance this planet will be broken – here – Newton idea is wrong completely because he looked at the mass but planet mass can decrease its velocity where the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken – by that – the planet has to create a function between its orbital distance and its diameter to move safely otherwise it will be broken – the point is Newton defined the mass as the basic player! (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department
,Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity, (Kepler Law Analysis).pdfGerges francis
Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity? (Kepler Law Analysis)
Abstract
Paper question
Kepler stated (Planet Orbit Defines Its Velocity) - Why?
What would happen if (Planet Orbit Doesn't Define Its Velocity)?
The answer of this question be summarized in 5 points which are:
(1)
Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
(2)
Planet Diameter Should Be An Indirect Function In Its Orbital Distance
(3)
Planet Mass Effects On Its Diameter Definition Equation
(4)
The Necessity Of The Function Between Planet Orbit And Its Velocity
(5)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity And The Big Bang Theory.
Let's consider each point in some details in following
(Point No. 1)
Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
- Planet data (Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, velocity, rotation period and axial tilt), this data be created based on exact equations and no single data be created by random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
- As in a plane or rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight….etc – all data and specifications be defined based on exact equations – similar to that Planet data be created based on exact equations.
- If planet data doesn't depend on exact equations, this planet can't move because the planet is moving through its trajectory and if this motion suffer from no harmony with All planet data – this planet will be broken through its motion – because it moves against its internal structure – we will discuss this idea deeply later.
(continued)
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers)
Abstract
Paper objective
The paper answers the following questions
1. Can each planet orbital distance depend on its neighbor planet orbital distance? In this case how the distance between the sun and Pluto be created? (Can One Map Be Drawn For All Planets Orbital Distances?)
2. Is There a necessity to create a proportionality between planet diameter and orbital distance?
3. Can Planet rotation period be defined based on its velocity?
4. Correct The wrong sentence (Planet Diameter Should Be A Direct Function In Its Orbital Distance And By That This Planet Will Not Be Broken Through Its Motion?)
5. Why Does Venus Have The Longest Rotation Period In The Solar System?
6. Can Planet orbital Distance be Defined before this planet creation? where planet orbital distance be defined based on its neighbor orbital distance?
7. Why Doesn't The Planet Break After Its Creation?
8. Planet data be (Mass – Diameter- Orbital Distance- Period –Inclination….etc) what data be created at first and what be created later?
9. Explain The Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance?
10. Why does the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period (No For Tidal Locking – this idea is wrong)?
11. Can The Planets Velocities Total Be Defined At First And Each Planet Velocity Be A Function In This Total?
12- Can Solar System Depend On One Geometrical Design?
13- Why Does The Moon Orbital Apogee Radius = 406000 km?
14- Can Mars Orbital Distance Be Changed From 84 million km to 228 million km?
15- Did Newton realize The Solar system Motion Logic?
16- How Be The Sun Disc Created?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Argument
The planets motions can be explained only based on the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System)
The Argument explanation
The solar planets are created complementary one another and their motions be integrated into one unified motion – by that- the planets be similar to members of one creature - Their creation data depends on one design and their motions be integrated together into one unified motion (as a machine of gears – many gears motions but the machine produces One Unified Motion)
Because of that
Any planet motion can be explained only through the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System), because based on this one design the planets be created and by this one design the planets motions be integrated and produced one unified motion.
Paper objective
- We have proved the one geometrical design before
- In this current paper we examine the one geometrical design details – by that the paper provides rich points of discussion because we discuss the geometrical details of this one design and their effects on the planets creation and motion data.
- The paper discussions points be summarized in following:
- (1)
- The paper proves the one design uses one map for the distance - means
- The solar system design uses the distance from the sun to Pluto as one piece of distance be distributed based on one map –
- (2)
- The paper proves the solar system design uses one more map for the velocities. by that, the design considers the planets motions be integrated into one unified motion as a machine of gears and this (unified velocity) be distributed for the planets velocities based on one more map.
- (3)
- The paper answers the question (why does the design use 2 different maps?) and explains the massive importance for this using
- The paper analyzes also my fourth equation to prove that – planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be created a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance.
- (4)
- The paper disproves the tidal locking claim as a reason for the moon cycles periods equality – the idea is wrong – where – the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period because of the solar system one design effect on the moon motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Dancing Planets
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Energy The Solar Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created
The hypothesis explanation
- (1)
- Newton Theory of the sun gravity is wrong in its logic because by one force the planet should be created and moving –otherwise this planet will be broken -means- The force which created the planet it causes its motion – by that no planet moves by the sun gravity
- (2)
- The Big Bang Theory Is Wrong Because – It Supposed – The First Energy Was In A Chaos Form Resulting From The First Explosion – in Fact – The First Energy (Of The Solar System) was in A Geometrical Design Form.
- (3)
- The physics book accepts (Matter and Space be Created Of Energies) – The paper hypothesis adds one idea tells (From One Energy They Were Created) – means - The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy
- Let's see the paper basic ideas in following
- (A)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations- As any plane or rocket creation – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width and All Other Specifications-
- Similar to that,
- Planet mass, diameter, orbital distance, period, velocity, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – all data be created based on exact equations and no data be created by any random process, initial conditions or historical unknown factors.
- By that, the planets data can be concluded by mathematical calculations only
- My 5 equations prove this fact (The 5 equations be tested in point no. 3)
- (B)
- The Planet data Exact equations depend on One Geometrical Design –means-
- Because the solar system creation and motion depends on One Geometrical Design, the planets data be created based on exact equations
- The One Geometrical Design is the basic argument of the paper –
- It's similar to the electron and positron be created from Gamma ray (The double production experiment), The 2 particles charges total be (Zero) because gamma ray charge is (Zero)
- By that, one law controls the 2 particles motions – and similar to that – one law or One Geometrical Design controls the solar planets creations and motions
- Also, from Planet motion analysis- we can reach to this same conclusion
- We accept that, one force only be used for planet creation and motion, and the force which created the planet causes its motion –otherwise this planet will be broken because 2 forces effect on it- but
- We don't have 9 forces create the 9 solar planets and cause their motions – instead- we have only one force causes all planets creation and motion –
- This one force can do this job only by using One Geometrical Design -
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Planet Diameter Definition Equation
Abstract
Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
(v1/v2) = (s/r) = I
v = Planet Velocity
r= Planet Diameter
s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
I= Planet Orbital Inclination
v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
The Equation Role
- The equation proves that, Planet diameter be created based on geometrical rule and as a function in this planet motion data –
- That tells, the motion was found and defined before this planet creation and for that the planet diameter be created depending on this planet motion data
The Equation Significance
- The Equation proves the argument
- By One Force The Solar Planets Be Created And Moving
- The sun didn't cause any planet creation, So (No planet moves by the sun gravity)
- By One Force and From One Energy All Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created And This Energy Causes The Planets Motions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Geometry Of Light Motion
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy.
- This one energy is provided by one light beam
- This light beam travels with a velocity =1.16 million km per second
Paper objective
- The paper is consisted of 2 parts
- Part no. (I) provides My Research Presentation Summary
- Part no. (II) discusses The Geometry Of Light Motion
- Let's refer to them in following..
Part No. (I) Research Presentation Summary
My research presentation is consisted of 6 points which are
(1)
Planet Orbital Distance Equation (My 1st Equation)
(2)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
(No Planet moves by The Sun Gravity)
(3)
The Research Method explanation And Using to prove 2 basic new discoveries which are:
(Mars Migration Theory) and
(The moon using of an angle θ between its motion direction and its orbit level)
(4)
The Research hypothesis (The planets matters and their distances be created from One Energy)
That's why (The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design)
Means (One Geometrical Design was found before the solar system creation)
That refutes (The Big Bang Theory)
(5)
The One Energy Is Provided By One Light Beam
(6)
The light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second.
That refutes (The hypothesis of the Special Theory of Relativity)
Part No. (II) Geometry Of Light Motion
What's the direct question behind this paper?
The matter and space are created from one light beam – means – the matter and space are forms of light forms –
Now, if this is a fact,
Why do we need to fight so hard to prove this very simple and clear fact?
Because
The light uses unknown geometrical rules –
By that this paper should be similar to a book of Geometry – because – it shows types of geometrical rules are unknown for us and not found in our Geometry books
It's a direct answer but not clear
Why don't we know these rules? Why can't we catch them in lab experiments? If so many unknown geometrical rules of light motion are found, and we couldn't catch them during the empirical physics history why can we do that now? Can any one stole at end the Geometry book from the heaven library?!
I have brought with me the planets data and later I have discovered that all unknown geometrical rules be hidden in them.
Shortly
The light creates the matter and space by using unknown geometrical rules – and – we can discover these geometrical rules by using planets data analysis – means – we can know these geometrical rules only if we can read correctly the planets data – for example – if we can answer the question (why the moon diameter =3475 km?) that will help us to discover the rules based on which the moon diameter be created.
So I will present my research summary then we should discuss these unknown geometrical rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Slide 1: Title Slide
Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Slide 2: Introduction to Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Definition: Extrachromosomal inheritance refers to the transmission of genetic material that is not found within the nucleus.
Key Components: Involves genes located in mitochondria, chloroplasts, and plasmids.
Slide 3: Mitochondrial Inheritance
Mitochondria: Organelles responsible for energy production.
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA): Circular DNA molecule found in mitochondria.
Inheritance Pattern: Maternally inherited, meaning it is passed from mothers to all their offspring.
Diseases: Examples include Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) and mitochondrial myopathy.
Slide 4: Chloroplast Inheritance
Chloroplasts: Organelles responsible for photosynthesis in plants.
Chloroplast DNA (cpDNA): Circular DNA molecule found in chloroplasts.
Inheritance Pattern: Often maternally inherited in most plants, but can vary in some species.
Examples: Variegation in plants, where leaf color patterns are determined by chloroplast DNA.
Slide 5: Plasmid Inheritance
Plasmids: Small, circular DNA molecules found in bacteria and some eukaryotes.
Features: Can carry antibiotic resistance genes and can be transferred between cells through processes like conjugation.
Significance: Important in biotechnology for gene cloning and genetic engineering.
Slide 6: Mechanisms of Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Non-Mendelian Patterns: Do not follow Mendel’s laws of inheritance.
Cytoplasmic Segregation: During cell division, organelles like mitochondria and chloroplasts are randomly distributed to daughter cells.
Heteroplasmy: Presence of more than one type of organellar genome within a cell, leading to variation in expression.
Slide 7: Examples of Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Four O’clock Plant (Mirabilis jalapa): Shows variegated leaves due to different cpDNA in leaf cells.
Petite Mutants in Yeast: Result from mutations in mitochondrial DNA affecting respiration.
Slide 8: Importance of Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Evolution: Provides insight into the evolution of eukaryotic cells.
Medicine: Understanding mitochondrial inheritance helps in diagnosing and treating mitochondrial diseases.
Agriculture: Chloroplast inheritance can be used in plant breeding and genetic modification.
Slide 9: Recent Research and Advances
Gene Editing: Techniques like CRISPR-Cas9 are being used to edit mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA.
Therapies: Development of mitochondrial replacement therapy (MRT) for preventing mitochondrial diseases.
Slide 10: Conclusion
Summary: Extrachromosomal inheritance involves the transmission of genetic material outside the nucleus and plays a crucial role in genetics, medicine, and biotechnology.
Future Directions: Continued research and technological advancements hold promise for new treatments and applications.
Slide 11: Questions and Discussion
Invite Audience: Open the floor for any questions or further discussion on the topic.
This pdf is about the Schizophrenia.
For more details visit on YouTube; @SELF-EXPLANATORY;
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAiarMZDNhe1A3Rnpr_WkzA/videos
Thanks...!
Deep Behavioral Phenotyping in Systems Neuroscience for Functional Atlasing a...Ana Luísa Pinho
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) provides means to characterize brain activations in response to behavior. However, cognitive neuroscience has been limited to group-level effects referring to the performance of specific tasks. To obtain the functional profile of elementary cognitive mechanisms, the combination of brain responses to many tasks is required. Yet, to date, both structural atlases and parcellation-based activations do not fully account for cognitive function and still present several limitations. Further, they do not adapt overall to individual characteristics. In this talk, I will give an account of deep-behavioral phenotyping strategies, namely data-driven methods in large task-fMRI datasets, to optimize functional brain-data collection and improve inference of effects-of-interest related to mental processes. Key to this approach is the employment of fast multi-functional paradigms rich on features that can be well parametrized and, consequently, facilitate the creation of psycho-physiological constructs to be modelled with imaging data. Particular emphasis will be given to music stimuli when studying high-order cognitive mechanisms, due to their ecological nature and quality to enable complex behavior compounded by discrete entities. I will also discuss how deep-behavioral phenotyping and individualized models applied to neuroimaging data can better account for the subject-specific organization of domain-general cognitive systems in the human brain. Finally, the accumulation of functional brain signatures brings the possibility to clarify relationships among tasks and create a univocal link between brain systems and mental functions through: (1) the development of ontologies proposing an organization of cognitive processes; and (2) brain-network taxonomies describing functional specialization. To this end, tools to improve commensurability in cognitive science are necessary, such as public repositories, ontology-based platforms and automated meta-analysis tools. I will thus discuss some brain-atlasing resources currently under development, and their applicability in cognitive as well as clinical neuroscience.
Professional air quality monitoring systems provide immediate, on-site data for analysis, compliance, and decision-making.
Monitor common gases, weather parameters, particulates.
Cancer cell metabolism: special Reference to Lactate PathwayAADYARAJPANDEY1
Normal Cell Metabolism:
Cellular respiration describes the series of steps that cells use to break down sugar and other chemicals to get the energy we need to function.
Energy is stored in the bonds of glucose and when glucose is broken down, much of that energy is released.
Cell utilize energy in the form of ATP.
The first step of respiration is called glycolysis. In a series of steps, glycolysis breaks glucose into two smaller molecules - a chemical called pyruvate. A small amount of ATP is formed during this process.
Most healthy cells continue the breakdown in a second process, called the Kreb's cycle. The Kreb's cycle allows cells to “burn” the pyruvates made in glycolysis to get more ATP.
The last step in the breakdown of glucose is called oxidative phosphorylation (Ox-Phos).
It takes place in specialized cell structures called mitochondria. This process produces a large amount of ATP. Importantly, cells need oxygen to complete oxidative phosphorylation.
If a cell completes only glycolysis, only 2 molecules of ATP are made per glucose. However, if the cell completes the entire respiration process (glycolysis - Kreb's - oxidative phosphorylation), about 36 molecules of ATP are created, giving it much more energy to use.
IN CANCER CELL:
Unlike healthy cells that "burn" the entire molecule of sugar to capture a large amount of energy as ATP, cancer cells are wasteful.
Cancer cells only partially break down sugar molecules. They overuse the first step of respiration, glycolysis. They frequently do not complete the second step, oxidative phosphorylation.
This results in only 2 molecules of ATP per each glucose molecule instead of the 36 or so ATPs healthy cells gain. As a result, cancer cells need to use a lot more sugar molecules to get enough energy to survive.
Unlike healthy cells that "burn" the entire molecule of sugar to capture a large amount of energy as ATP, cancer cells are wasteful.
Cancer cells only partially break down sugar molecules. They overuse the first step of respiration, glycolysis. They frequently do not complete the second step, oxidative phosphorylation.
This results in only 2 molecules of ATP per each glucose molecule instead of the 36 or so ATPs healthy cells gain. As a result, cancer cells need to use a lot more sugar molecules to get enough energy to survive.
introduction to WARBERG PHENOMENA:
WARBURG EFFECT Usually, cancer cells are highly glycolytic (glucose addiction) and take up more glucose than do normal cells from outside.
Otto Heinrich Warburg (; 8 October 1883 – 1 August 1970) In 1931 was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology for his "discovery of the nature and mode of action of the respiratory enzyme.
WARNBURG EFFECT : cancer cells under aerobic (well-oxygenated) conditions to metabolize glucose to lactate (aerobic glycolysis) is known as the Warburg effect. Warburg made the observation that tumor slices consume glucose and secrete lactate at a higher rate than normal tissues.
Introduction:
RNA interference (RNAi) or Post-Transcriptional Gene Silencing (PTGS) is an important biological process for modulating eukaryotic gene expression.
It is highly conserved process of posttranscriptional gene silencing by which double stranded RNA (dsRNA) causes sequence-specific degradation of mRNA sequences.
dsRNA-induced gene silencing (RNAi) is reported in a wide range of eukaryotes ranging from worms, insects, mammals and plants.
This process mediates resistance to both endogenous parasitic and exogenous pathogenic nucleic acids, and regulates the expression of protein-coding genes.
What are small ncRNAs?
micro RNA (miRNA)
short interfering RNA (siRNA)
Properties of small non-coding RNA:
Involved in silencing mRNA transcripts.
Called “small” because they are usually only about 21-24 nucleotides long.
Synthesized by first cutting up longer precursor sequences (like the 61nt one that Lee discovered).
Silence an mRNA by base pairing with some sequence on the mRNA.
Discovery of siRNA?
The first small RNA:
In 1993 Rosalind Lee (Victor Ambros lab) was studying a non- coding gene in C. elegans, lin-4, that was involved in silencing of another gene, lin-14, at the appropriate time in the
development of the worm C. elegans.
Two small transcripts of lin-4 (22nt and 61nt) were found to be complementary to a sequence in the 3' UTR of lin-14.
Because lin-4 encoded no protein, she deduced that it must be these transcripts that are causing the silencing by RNA-RNA interactions.
Types of RNAi ( non coding RNA)
MiRNA
Length (23-25 nt)
Trans acting
Binds with target MRNA in mismatch
Translation inhibition
Si RNA
Length 21 nt.
Cis acting
Bind with target Mrna in perfect complementary sequence
Piwi-RNA
Length ; 25 to 36 nt.
Expressed in Germ Cells
Regulates trnasposomes activity
MECHANISM OF RNAI:
First the double-stranded RNA teams up with a protein complex named Dicer, which cuts the long RNA into short pieces.
Then another protein complex called RISC (RNA-induced silencing complex) discards one of the two RNA strands.
The RISC-docked, single-stranded RNA then pairs with the homologous mRNA and destroys it.
THE RISC COMPLEX:
RISC is large(>500kD) RNA multi- protein Binding complex which triggers MRNA degradation in response to MRNA
Unwinding of double stranded Si RNA by ATP independent Helicase
Active component of RISC is Ago proteins( ENDONUCLEASE) which cleave target MRNA.
DICER: endonuclease (RNase Family III)
Argonaute: Central Component of the RNA-Induced Silencing Complex (RISC)
One strand of the dsRNA produced by Dicer is retained in the RISC complex in association with Argonaute
ARGONAUTE PROTEIN :
1.PAZ(PIWI/Argonaute/ Zwille)- Recognition of target MRNA
2.PIWI (p-element induced wimpy Testis)- breaks Phosphodiester bond of mRNA.)RNAse H activity.
MiRNA:
The Double-stranded RNAs are naturally produced in eukaryotic cells during development, and they have a key role in regulating gene expression .
What is greenhouse gasses and how many gasses are there to affect the Earth.moosaasad1975
What are greenhouse gasses how they affect the earth and its environment what is the future of the environment and earth how the weather and the climate effects.
Richard's entangled aventures in wonderlandRichard Gill
Since the loophole-free Bell experiments of 2020 and the Nobel prizes in physics of 2022, critics of Bell's work have retreated to the fortress of super-determinism. Now, super-determinism is a derogatory word - it just means "determinism". Palmer, Hance and Hossenfelder argue that quantum mechanics and determinism are not incompatible, using a sophisticated mathematical construction based on a subtle thinning of allowed states and measurements in quantum mechanics, such that what is left appears to make Bell's argument fail, without altering the empirical predictions of quantum mechanics. I think however that it is a smoke screen, and the slogan "lost in math" comes to my mind. I will discuss some other recent disproofs of Bell's theorem using the language of causality based on causal graphs. Causal thinking is also central to law and justice. I will mention surprising connections to my work on serial killer nurse cases, in particular the Dutch case of Lucia de Berk and the current UK case of Lucy Letby.
(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...Scintica Instrumentation
Intravital microscopy (IVM) is a powerful tool utilized to study cellular behavior over time and space in vivo. Much of our understanding of cell biology has been accomplished using various in vitro and ex vivo methods; however, these studies do not necessarily reflect the natural dynamics of biological processes. Unlike traditional cell culture or fixed tissue imaging, IVM allows for the ultra-fast high-resolution imaging of cellular processes over time and space and were studied in its natural environment. Real-time visualization of biological processes in the context of an intact organism helps maintain physiological relevance and provide insights into the progression of disease, response to treatments or developmental processes.
In this webinar we give an overview of advanced applications of the IVM system in preclinical research. IVIM technology is a provider of all-in-one intravital microscopy systems and solutions optimized for in vivo imaging of live animal models at sub-micron resolution. The system’s unique features and user-friendly software enables researchers to probe fast dynamic biological processes such as immune cell tracking, cell-cell interaction as well as vascularization and tumor metastasis with exceptional detail. This webinar will also give an overview of IVM being utilized in drug development, offering a view into the intricate interaction between drugs/nanoparticles and tissues in vivo and allows for the evaluation of therapeutic intervention in a variety of tissues and organs. This interdisciplinary collaboration continues to drive the advancements of novel therapeutic strategies.
Observation vs data analysis as astrophysics research method
1. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
1
Observation vs Data Analysis As Astrophysics Research Method (I)
By Gerges Francis Twadrous
2nd
Course Student – Physics Department - Physics & Math Faculty –
Peoples' Friendship University – Moscow – Russia -2010-2013
TEL +201022532292 mrwaheid@gmail.com / georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
The Assumption Of S. Virgin Mary -Written in Cairo – Egypt – 4th
July 2019
Abstract
We have 2 basic arguments:
1st
Argument
- Planet Data Analysis Should Be Considered The Astrophysics Research Basic
Method.
- The Observational Results Without Data Analysis Deceives The Researcher
And Causes Imaginary Concepts Creation
2nd
Argument
1- The Solar Group is One Geometrical Structure or one building and each planet
is a part of this same building- i.e. Each Planet is created to be a complementary to
the other planets and No solar planet is created or move independently
2- Also, The solar group can be similar to one trajectory of Energy and each planet is
a point on it.
3- Also the solar group can be similar to one body, and each planet is a member in this
same body. All solar planets and their orbital distances are created by the same
energy (by the same blood all body members are created)
4- Also, The solar group be similar to one machine each planet is a gear in this same
machine… so the machine job depends on the gears different tasks.. and that
means the cooperation and integration between the solar planets data is the
main base on which the solar group is created and move.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Twitter https://twitter.com/TawdrousF
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
All my papers http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous
2. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
2
1- Introduction
Are The Observational Results Trustee?
i.e.
How We Understand And Explain The Observational Results?
Simply we don't trust the direct vision- When we see a broken spoon in the tea Cup-
we don't accept that as a fact because we may talk the spoon and see that it's not
broken and the direct vision is un-trustee
But
If we can't talk the spoon from the Cup – how can we know if what we see is a real or
not? Let's consider the vision reasoning for a little in following..
The human daily experience provides classical concepts – for example – because we
see the solar planets as independent bodies from each other we consider that each
planet is independent from the others - now this consideration depends on weaken
basics because we have no Definition For Space – and – we don't know if the space
separates the planets from each other or bind them – here the classical concepts
ignored the space definition and built a description in mind supports the direct vision
regardless the truth –
Let's consider one more example
The moon revolves around Earth once each 27.3 days –
Is the space around Earth found with or without the moon motion?
Because may the moon motion creates the space around Earth and based on that we
see the other solar planets and all heavenly bodies through the moon motion which
means that the moon motion effects on our vision for the heavenly bodies.
Space Definition will always be one point against the classical concepts
In fact this discussion should be more complex
Why? Let's try to think
We see the planet motion trajectory as an ellipse – but – how the ellipse is created?-
Einstein had answered this question – when he left the rock to drop from the train
travels with uniform velocity – he saw the rock dropped in a straight line – but the
people on platform saw the rock dropped as in parabola – so he concluded that – the
motion trajectory is relative….
And what about us – we see the planet motion trajectory as an ellipse - how this
elliptical trajectory is created? What's Earth velocity and this planet velocity and
based on what we see the trajectory as an ellipse?
The explanation here based on the gravity concept… !
In fact – we may discuss some doubts against the sun gravity concept soon -
I want to say that……..
The theory accepts the observational results as facts without any analysis for the
vision reasoning- based on that – the theory creates imaginary concepts explaining
3. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
3
these observational results… where the concepts are proved only by these
observational results….
By such method we have in our astrophysics book many imaginary concepts
Let's provide 2 proves for this claim –
(1st
PROOF)
The Solar Planets Order Doesn't Support The Sun Gravity Concept
Let's analyze the solar planets order in following:
(1)
The inner planets order (Mercury – Venus – Earth) shows that there's some
relationship between the planet diameter (or mass) with their orbital distance, means
Greater Diameter (Or Mass) needs Greater Orbital Distance …
(2)
The outer planets order (Jupiter- Saturn- Uranus- Neptune – Pluto) tells that the rule
is reversed (after Mars) where Greater Diameter needs Shorter Orbital Distance ….
But…. The order depends on diameter and NOT on Mass because Uranus Diameter
is greater that Neptune where Neptune Mass is greater than Uranus..
(3)
Primary Conclusion
There's some relationship between The Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance but this
relationship is reversed after Mars for some reason- (Note Please/ The Data Direction
doesn't support the relationship between the planet mass and orbital distance which
disproves the sun gravity concept)
Objection
When I asked this question… the answer was "because of the Initial Points"
But where are these initial points?
The inner and outer planets orders provide 2 different forms for THE SAME RULE
….. So the nearest conclusion is that there's a relationship between the planet
diameter and orbital distance where Mars position in the solar group order causes
disturbance for this relationship.
FINAL CONCLUSION
The solar planets order doesn't support the sun gravity concept – so – on what proves
the sun gravity concept is created? If there's no any proof for the gravity concept how
the gravitational equation is created and accepted?
(2nd
PROOF)
How The Planets Diameters Were Created?
What the Big Bang theory tells us? a big star followed the sun later exploded and
from this star material, the solar planets were created..!
4. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
4
What we understood from this idea?
Based on Random Process the solar planets were created… "random process" based
on this 2 words ("random process") all big bang theory (or theories) were created!
Pure imagination based on unreal vision… why? Because no one ask what's the
planet diameter? What's the planet mass? What's the planet data? …..
So- the big bang theory is built in fact without any theoretical reasoning…
The next table disproves simply this theory
Table No. 1 No Error More Than 1.5%
The Relationship The Rate
Earth Diameter / Venus Diameter =
= Mars Diameter / Earth Radius =
A
Mars Diameter / Venus Radius =
= Venus Diameter / Moon Circumference =
= Moon Radius * Π/ Mercury Diameter =
= Pluto Circumference / Mars Diameter =
=Uranus Circumference / Jupiter Diameter =
= lunar apogee radius /lunar perigee radius =
A2
Pluto Circumference / Earth Radius =
= Mercury Circumference / Earth Diameter =
= Earth Diameter / Moon Circumference =
= Uranus Radius / Mars Circumference =
= Jupiter Diameter / Saturn Diameter =
= Saturn diameter / Uranus Diameter =
A3
Venus Radius / Mercury Diameter =
= Uranus Diameter / Earth Circumference =
A4
Uranus Diameter / Venus Circumference = A5
Jupiter Radius / Uranus Diameter =
= Mercury Diameter / Moon Diameter =
= Mars Diameter / Mercury Diameter =
A6
Discussion
When the planets diameters are created by random process- they may have such rates
relative to each other! Can that be possible?
THE MAIN CONCEPT IS MISTAKEN- the solar planets can't be created by any
random process – and the solar planets aren't independent from each other – on the
contrary – the solar planets are created to consist together one building (or one
machine) for that reason each planet is created to be complementary to the other
planets - because all of them consists one machine- that tells us also – the planets
5. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
5
motions are not independent from each other and that's the planets motions general
harmony reason.
General Comment
I have analyzed the solar group data –may I did that correctly or wrongly – but
(1)
No one can refuse our analysis based on a claim– "this data direction which
concerning our solar system can be disproved by data from Other Solar Systems"
Because
We analyze the solar planets data to explain it and not to explain the other solar
systems data- now our solar system data is our task to be analyzed and we need to
know how this data is created– and if there's no disproving data in our solar system –
so the conclusion is proved.
(2)
No one may claim that – our solar system Historical Development disproves the
conclusion – because the planets current data is trustee more than any historical
stories.
What we try to do here?
We'll discuss here 4 phenomena–in series of papers- in each phenomena – I'll try to
prove that –
The Vision Reasoning Can Change The Basic Conclusion We Reach By The
Observational Results –
This discussion contains the following subjects
1- The Unit Definition Is Relative
2- The Planet Motion Elliptical Trajectory Analysis
3- Moon Motion effect on the solar planets observational results
4- The Observational Results Contradicts The Solar Group Energy Direction.
In this paper we discuss the following argument
"The Unit Definition Is Relative"
Let's start immediately in following….
2- Methodology
- I use Planet Data Analysis As Astrophysics Research Method -
- I use NASA Planetary Fact Sheet (http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/)
6. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
6
3- The Unit Definition Is Relative
3-1 The Basic Argument
3-2 Data
3-3 Discussion
3-1 The Basic Argument
What's the space? How to create the space?!
What's 1 meter or even 1million km? It's some measurement – one meter is a length
of a solid rod kept in some museum! But how to create 1 meter of Space?
How the space is created? We imagine that "the space is some emptiness- space is
nothing and found without creation because it's mere nothing!"
It's some description in our mind – but let me provide another description to provide
some doubt in this direct vision…
Why the Space is emptiness or nothing? Why we think so? Because it's some
darkness –empty area has no matter or even light so it's mere space (emptiness)
In Young Experiment (Double Slit Experiment) – Young created a light coherence
and the produced interference consisted of bright fringes and dark fringes – as the
figure show –
The interference consists of Bright fringes and dark fringes –
Now imagine that – the light coherence was so huge where the dark fringe breadth is
so wide (for example =10000 km) – and we live inside the dark fringe- what we will
see there? Darkness….
So the space is not mere nothing – the space which is darkness can be produced by
light coherence –
Now the question – how to create the space – will not be some very strange question-
in fact – based on this idea we can create the space…
We still follow this same idea – how to define the unit based on this idea?- because
what we see as space and distance – in fact – it's created by some light coherence –
and that means – what we measure in kilometers can be evaluated in Newton, joules
or even watts – the definition of unit here depends on the direct vision and personal
evaluation!
7. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
7
All what I try to do is to plant some doubts against concepts have no real proves and
still working as facts.
Let's consider another example to discuss…
Mercury Orbital Circumference = 360 million km and also =360 degrees
That means for Mercury Motion each 1 degree = 1 million km
That means
If Mercury moves daily 4.095 million km that means it moves in fact 4.095 degrees –
both units are equal to each other – and based on that – both units are exchangeable…
The Most Important Idea
The solar group is one machine – each planet is a gear in this same machine – that
means – all planets move together by cooperating motion – that guarantees the
planets motions general harmony –
Why this vision is strange?
Because we think that the space separates the planets from each – as the sea separates
the sailor from his home – this naïve description prevents us to see the most
important idea in the solar group that "The solar group is one machine" – we can't
accept this idea because the space is the sea which prevents the planets to reach each
other…!
Please review
The Unit Definition Is Relative
http://vixra.org/abs/1906.0379
Earth Velocity Proves "The Unit Definition Is Relative"
http://vixra.org/abs/1906.0465
8. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
8
3-2 Data
Group No. 1
The Main Equation (Equation 3-2)
6585.39 =232.7 x 28.3 = 278.4 x 23.6
Where
232.7 degrees = Solar Inner Planets Axial Tilts Total
28.3 degrees = Neptune Axial tilt
278.4 degrees = Solar Our Planets Axial Tilts Total
23.6 degrees = Solar Outer Planets Orbital Inclinations Total
And we know that
6585.39 days = Saros Cycle Period (Eclipse Calendar)
Group No. 2
25920 years = Precession Cycle (Precession of the equinoxes)
25920 mkm = 86400 seconds x light velocity (0.3 mkm/sec)
Group No. 3
Satrun Orbital Distance = 1433.5 million km
Table No.1 error
-1433.5 days x Mercury velocity daily 4.095 mkm = 5870 mkm Pluto Orbital Distance 0
-1433.5 days x Venus velocity daily 3.02 mkm = 4329 mkm Venus Neptune Distance 0
-1433.5 days x Earth velocity daily 2.58 mkm = 3699 mkm Jupiter Neptune Distance 0
-1433.5 days x Mars velocity daily 2.082 mkm = 2984.5 mkm Uranus Pluto Distance 0
-1433.5 days x Jupiter velocity daily 1.1318 mkm = 1622.4 mkm Uranus Neptune Distance 0
-1433.5 days x Saturn velocity daily 0.838 mkm = 1201 mkm Mars Saturn Distance 0.3%
-1433.5 days x Uranus velocity daily 0.5875 mkm = 842 mkm
-1433.5 days x Neptune velocity daily 0.4665 mkm = 670 mkm Venus Jupiter Distance 0
-1433.5 days x Pluto velocity daily 0.406 mkm = 582 mkm Mercury Earth distance*2Π 1%
9. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
9
3-2 Discussion
Group No. 1
The Main Equation
6585.39 =232.7 x 28.3 = 278.4 x 23.6
Where
232.7 degrees = Solar Inner Planets Axial Tilts Total
28.3 degrees = Neptune Axial tilt
278.4 degrees = Solar Our Planets Axial Tilts Total
23.6 degrees = Solar Outer Planets Orbital Inclinations Total
And we know that
6585.39 days = Saros Cycle Period (Eclipse Calendar)
How to understand the previous data?
Let's try to divide this question into smaller parts?
How the degrees can be days? So the value 6585.39 degrees became 6585.39
days (Saros Cycle Period)
shortly…How 1 degree = 1 day?
Earth Moon Orbit regresses each year 19 degrees and this regression causes
regression for the eclipse calendar with 19 days –means – 19 degrees causes 19 days
i.e. 1 degree = 1 day…
Again ….. How to perform that? By the moon orbit regression (motion)…!
Now the motion has a new vision! What we know about the moon motion? We know
that the moon moves by Earth gravity forces – moon motion is a mechanical motion
produced based on his mass relative to Earth mass – the idea is clear –the moon
motion has no relationship with the any planet orbital inclination or axial tilt..
But
The Data tells another idea….
The classical idea which we keep by heart –simply –is a pure imagination- in fact
the moon orbit motion depends on Saros Cycle which is produced by the planets
orbital inclinations and axial tilts cooperation according to the previous Equation…
i.e. Saros Cycle is produced as a result of Planets Data Cooperation
The Data – simply supports us
6585.39 days (Saros Cycle Period) = 239 x 27.55 days (anomalist month )
= 19 x 346.6 days (Nodal Year)
= 223 x 29.53 days (lunar Synodic Year)
Nodal Year is produced by The Moon Orbit Motion
Lunar Synodic Month is produced by The Moon Motion
Anomalist Month is produced by The Moon Orbit Motion
Simply – the data tells us that – many motions are cooperated to produce Saros
Cycle…. So what we have seen in degrees we see again in motions
Let's see Metonic Cycle – which can support this idea so strongly in following:
10. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
10
6939.75 days (Metonic Cycle Period) = 19 x 365.25 days (Sidereal Year)
= 20 x 346.6 days (Nodal Year)
= 235 x 29.53 days (lunar Synodic Year)
Sidereal Year is produced by Earth Motion
Nodal Year is produced by The Moon Orbit Motion
Lunar Synodic Month is produced by The Moon Motion
So Earth, Moon And Moon Orbit Motions should be in harmony with each other to
produce Metonic Cycle….
The usual answer "Pure Coincidence" has no any effect here – because we have seen
the cooperation is degrees and then we have seen this same cooperation in the
motions themselves…
Based on that – the description that – Each planet moves independently from the
other solar planets - is a pure imaginary description – has no proves at all – on the
contrary – Planet Data Analysis and Direction disproves this idea strongly.
Let's discuss another example to see much better in following:
Example (1)
How to explain the previous Equation?
I have tried to explain this equation before- nevertheless - let's try to conclude the
basic idea behind this equation
What can we conclude here?
There's A Dependency Between these 4 Planets Axial Tilts
Someone will claim that's "Pure Coincidence"! but we see it's somehow difficult to
accept the same pure coincidence three times
So we have to conclude that there's some relationship between these planets axial tilts
So- the Equation explanation is hard – but The Data Direction is clear- there's some
relationship between These Planets Axial Tilts…let's see the next equation..
The Previous equation supports The Same Data Direction –it tells – there's a deep
relationship between These Planets Axial Tilts – and this relationship is seen between
these planets axial tilts on the horizontal level as well as on the vertical level.
We concluded that – there's some dependency here – but what does this mean? in fact
we need better understanding – let's do that with the following example…
0725.1
tiltaxailSatrun26.7
tiltaxailNeptune28.3
tiltaxailMars25.2
tiltaxailSatrun26.7
tiltaxailEarth23.4
tiltaxailMars25.2
===
11. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
11
Example (2)
1. 17.4 deg. (Inner Planets Orbital Inclinations Total) x 0.99 = 17.2 deg (Pluto orbital
inclination)
2. 23.6 deg. (Outer Planets Orbital Inclinations Total) x 0.99 = 23.4 deg (Earth Axial Tilt)
3. (180/2π) =28.66 deg(But 28.66 deg x 0.99 =28.3 deg (Neptune Orbital Inclination)
Discussion
The rate 0.99 we have discussed frequently in my previous papers- where the
previous 3 equations are mere examples for huge number of similar data
I try to support the same idea – the direct observation gave us mere imaginary
description more than any truth –
On the contrary
The data analysis – simply shows the geometrical design depth – we simply accepts
that the planets are created and move depending on each other –
The data gives us no chance to escape
Let's see one more example in following
Example (3)
Simply the planets define their velocities based on 2 factors (1st
the value 2π2
) and (2nd
other planet
velocity) –
Again the dependency which we have seen in planets orbital inclinations and axial tilts we see again
this same dependency in the planets velocities..
Yes – I don't know yet the geometrical mechanism by which this happens –
But
The data direction is strong enough to make my claim simply acceptable
Shortly…
The planet motion classical theory completely mistaken
Let's discuss Data Group No. 2
12. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
12
Group No. 2
25920 years = Precession Cycle (Precession of the equinoxes)
25920 mkm = 86400 seconds x light velocity (0.3 mkm/sec)
We know Precession Cycle =25920 years – It's The Earth Axis Cycle – which
considered the basic Cycle in the solar group..
But
Light passes during a solar day period (86400 seconds) a distance =25920 mkm
To be both value =25920 ……..It's NOT pure coincidences…. It's part of the
geometrical design by which the solar group is created – spite the geometrical
mechanism still far to be realized we simply conclude that these 2 values are equal
because both of them are produced depending on each other
(As -Mercury orbital circumference 360 mkm and 360 degrees so 1 degree = 1 mkm)
These 2 values are similar – they equal each other because they depend on each other
– but we need the geometrical mechanism to prove that.
Group No. 3
Saturn Orbital Distance = 1433.5 million km
Table No.1 error
-1433.5 days x Mercury velocity daily 4.095 mkm = 5870 mkm Pluto Orbital Distance 0
-1433.5 days x Venus velocity daily 3.02 mkm = 4329 mkm Venus Neptune Distance 0
-1433.5 days x Earth velocity daily 2.58 mkm = 3699 mkm Jupiter Neptune Distance 0
-1433.5 days x Mars velocity daily 2.082 mkm = 2984.5 mkm Uranus Pluto Distance 0
-1433.5 days x Jupiter velocity daily 1.1318 mkm = 1622.4 mkm Uranus Neptune Distance 0
-1433.5 days x Saturn velocity daily 0.838 mkm = 1201 mkm Mars Saturn Distance 0.3%
-1433.5 days x Uranus velocity daily 0.5875 mkm = 842 mkm
-1433.5 days x Neptune velocity daily 0.4665 mkm = 670 mkm Venus Jupiter Distance 0
-1433.5 days x Pluto velocity daily 0.406 mkm = 582 mkm Mercury Earth distance*2Π 1%
Data Group No. 3 provide a clear claim as following:
The time and distance values can be equivalent – and that means – what we see as distance can
be working as time
This idea I have discussed deeply in my previous paper
Time And Distance Equivalence (Proves) http://vixra.org/abs/1904.0125
Special Theory Of Relativity (Questions For Discussion) http://vixra.org/abs/1906.0008
Other Papers
Gerges Equations For Solar Group Geometry http://vixra.org/abs/1906.0564
Direction Of Energy Through The Solar Group http://vixra.org/abs/1906.0541
Uranus Is Perpendicular on Earth Moon Orbit http://vixra.org/abs/1906.0316
There's A Light Beam Travels With 1.16 mkm per sec (My Claim)
http://vixra.org/abs/1904.0236