This document discusses the fundamentals of using vasopressors. It outlines the steps to determine when to start vasopressors: 1) Is the patient's blood pressure too low? 2) Why is the blood pressure low? 3) How to raise the blood pressure? Norepinephrine is generally the first-line vasopressor. Adjuncts like vasopressin and steroids may be considered if norepinephrine dose is high. Peripheral intravenous lines can be used for vasopressors in the short term but central lines are preferable at higher doses due to risk of extravasation from peripheral lines.
This document provides an overview of inotropes and vasopressors used to support cardiac function. It reviews the physiology of cardiac contraction and classifies drugs by their mechanisms of action on beta-adrenergic, alpha-adrenergic, or phosphodiesterase receptors. Common agents like dopamine, norepinephrine, and vasopressin are described in terms of their hemodynamic effects. The document notes the limited evidence to guide clinical use and suggests choice depends on individual patient factors. Novel approaches combining inotropes with beta-blockers are also mentioned.
A Practical Approach to Ionotropes and vasopressors Aneesh Bhandary
Vasopressors are a powerful class of drugs that induce vasoconstriction and Inotropes increase cardiac contractility. Choice of an agent should be based upon the suspected underlying etiology of shock.
This presentation deals with the practical issues and controversies surrounding the use of these agents
Pharmacology of-vasopressors-and-inotropesCorey Ahmad
The document discusses the pharmacology of vasopressors and inotropes. It describes how these drugs work via the autonomic nervous system, especially on alpha, beta, and dopamine receptors. Adrenaline is discussed as the most commonly used drug and acts on multiple receptor types. Other vasopressors mentioned include ephedrine, methoxamine, metaraminol, and phenylephrine. Inotropes given by infusion include noradrenaline, dopamine, dobutamine, dopexamine, isoprenaline, and phosphodiesterase inhibitors. A clinical case study reviews the use of ephedrine to treat hypotension during a lower segment Caesarean
This document summarizes recommendations for vasopressor therapy in sepsis and septic shock. It discusses the pathophysiology of sepsis and progression to septic shock. Early sepsis is characterized by hypovolemia, lactic acidosis, and increased oxygen extraction. Late-stage septic shock involves vasoplegia, reduced stroke volume, microcirculatory failure, and mitochondrial dysfunction leading to multi-organ failure. The document recommends norepinephrine as the initial vasopressor and considers epinephrine, vasopressin, and dobutamine as adjunctive therapies. It cautions against the use of dopamine and phenylephrine based on their adverse effects.
Rational choice of inotropes and vasopressors in intensive care unitSaneesh P J
The presentation introduces commonly used interpose and vasopressors; their classification; and how to choose the drug in ICU. Clinical scenarios - cariogenic shock; neurocritical care; septic shock and anaphylactic shock are elaborated.
This document discusses types of shock, goals of therapy for different shock states, and vasopressor pharmacology. It defines hypovolemic, cardiogenic, septic, neurogenic, and combined shocks. The goals for hypovolemic shock are to increase preload with fluids, while cardiogenic shock aims to increase cardiac output with drugs like dopamine or dobutamine. Septic and neurogenic shock goals are to first increase preload then increase afterload with vasopressors like norepinephrine, phenylephrine, and vasopressin. Norepinephrine is usually the initial vasopressor, while other drugs like dopamine, epinephrine, vasopressin may be used as adjunct
The term inotropic state is most commonly used in reference to various drugs that affect the strength of contraction of heart muscle (myocardial contractility). However, it can also refer to pathological conditions. For example, enlarged heart muscle (ventricular hypertrophy) can increase inotropic state, whereas dead heart muscle (myocardial infarction) can decrease it.
This document summarizes different vasopressors and inotropes used to treat hypotension. It describes the receptor activities, physiological effects, indications, and complications of various drugs including phenylephrine, norepinephrine, epinephrine, dopamine, dobutamine, vasopressin, and phosphodiesterase inhibitors. It provides guidance on selecting agents and titrating doses based on the underlying cause of hypotension and the patient's clinical status.
This document provides an overview of inotropes and vasopressors used to support cardiac function. It reviews the physiology of cardiac contraction and classifies drugs by their mechanisms of action on beta-adrenergic, alpha-adrenergic, or phosphodiesterase receptors. Common agents like dopamine, norepinephrine, and vasopressin are described in terms of their hemodynamic effects. The document notes the limited evidence to guide clinical use and suggests choice depends on individual patient factors. Novel approaches combining inotropes with beta-blockers are also mentioned.
A Practical Approach to Ionotropes and vasopressors Aneesh Bhandary
Vasopressors are a powerful class of drugs that induce vasoconstriction and Inotropes increase cardiac contractility. Choice of an agent should be based upon the suspected underlying etiology of shock.
This presentation deals with the practical issues and controversies surrounding the use of these agents
Pharmacology of-vasopressors-and-inotropesCorey Ahmad
The document discusses the pharmacology of vasopressors and inotropes. It describes how these drugs work via the autonomic nervous system, especially on alpha, beta, and dopamine receptors. Adrenaline is discussed as the most commonly used drug and acts on multiple receptor types. Other vasopressors mentioned include ephedrine, methoxamine, metaraminol, and phenylephrine. Inotropes given by infusion include noradrenaline, dopamine, dobutamine, dopexamine, isoprenaline, and phosphodiesterase inhibitors. A clinical case study reviews the use of ephedrine to treat hypotension during a lower segment Caesarean
This document summarizes recommendations for vasopressor therapy in sepsis and septic shock. It discusses the pathophysiology of sepsis and progression to septic shock. Early sepsis is characterized by hypovolemia, lactic acidosis, and increased oxygen extraction. Late-stage septic shock involves vasoplegia, reduced stroke volume, microcirculatory failure, and mitochondrial dysfunction leading to multi-organ failure. The document recommends norepinephrine as the initial vasopressor and considers epinephrine, vasopressin, and dobutamine as adjunctive therapies. It cautions against the use of dopamine and phenylephrine based on their adverse effects.
Rational choice of inotropes and vasopressors in intensive care unitSaneesh P J
The presentation introduces commonly used interpose and vasopressors; their classification; and how to choose the drug in ICU. Clinical scenarios - cariogenic shock; neurocritical care; septic shock and anaphylactic shock are elaborated.
This document discusses types of shock, goals of therapy for different shock states, and vasopressor pharmacology. It defines hypovolemic, cardiogenic, septic, neurogenic, and combined shocks. The goals for hypovolemic shock are to increase preload with fluids, while cardiogenic shock aims to increase cardiac output with drugs like dopamine or dobutamine. Septic and neurogenic shock goals are to first increase preload then increase afterload with vasopressors like norepinephrine, phenylephrine, and vasopressin. Norepinephrine is usually the initial vasopressor, while other drugs like dopamine, epinephrine, vasopressin may be used as adjunct
The term inotropic state is most commonly used in reference to various drugs that affect the strength of contraction of heart muscle (myocardial contractility). However, it can also refer to pathological conditions. For example, enlarged heart muscle (ventricular hypertrophy) can increase inotropic state, whereas dead heart muscle (myocardial infarction) can decrease it.
This document summarizes different vasopressors and inotropes used to treat hypotension. It describes the receptor activities, physiological effects, indications, and complications of various drugs including phenylephrine, norepinephrine, epinephrine, dopamine, dobutamine, vasopressin, and phosphodiesterase inhibitors. It provides guidance on selecting agents and titrating doses based on the underlying cause of hypotension and the patient's clinical status.
Ionotropes and vasopressor use in the EDSCGH ED CME
This document discusses the use of inotropes and vasopressors in the emergency department for management of shock. It provides an overview of different drug classes including their mechanisms of action, dosages, and side effects. Case studies are presented to demonstrate how these drugs may be used in scenarios involving hypotension, shock, and heart block. Key drugs discussed include norepinephrine, dopamine, adrenaline, metaraminol, and isoprenaline. The document emphasizes the importance of determining the type of shock and selecting an appropriate drug to increase cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance, or both depending on the clinical situation.
The document reviews the use of ionotropes in pediatric practice, describing the receptor subtypes targeted by various ionotropic drugs, the pharmacology and effects of individual agents like adrenaline, noradrenaline, dopamine, and dobutamine, important considerations for drug administration, and newer agents like phosphodiesterase inhibitors and vasopressin.
1) The document provides information on inotropes and vasopressors including their classification, sites of action, clinical effects, indications, and doses. It discusses catecholamines like adrenaline, noradrenaline, dopamine, and dobutamine. It also covers phosphodiesterase inhibitors, vasopressin, ephedrine, metaraminol, phenylephrine, methoxamine, and digoxin.
2) The document concludes with recommendations on first and second line vasopressor/inotropic agents for different clinical situations like septic shock, heart failure, cardiogenic shock, anaphylactic shock, and anesthesia-induced hypotension.
1. This document discusses various inotropes and vasopressors used to treat shock states including dobutamine, dopamine, epinephrine, and norepinephrine.
2. It provides guidelines on administering these drugs including desired dose ranges, how to calculate infusion rates, and examples of calculating dobutamine infusion rates.
3. The document also matches different shock states, such as septic shock, cardiogenic shock, and hemorrhagic shock, with recommended first-tier and second-tier drug treatments.
The document defines important terms related to vasoactive drugs and their mechanisms of action. It discusses inotropes, vasopressors, cardiac output, stroke volume, mean arterial pressure, and circulatory shock. It also describes receptors like alpha-1, beta-1, and dopamine D1 receptors. The document provides guidelines for rational use of vasoactive drugs including starting dose, titration, monitoring, and correcting electrolyte imbalances. It also provides methods for calculating dosages of drugs like adrenaline, noradrenaline, and dopamine.
This document provides an overview of vasopressors and inotropes used in critical care to treat shock. It discusses the different types of shock and principles of resuscitation including fluid administration and optimization of oxygen delivery and consumption. It also reviews the mechanisms of action, indications, and side effects of commonly used vasopressors and inotropes like dopamine, dobutamine, milrinone, levophed, phenylephrine, epinephrine, and vasopressin. Case studies are presented to demonstrate how these agents may be applied based on a patient's hemodynamic status.
Adenosine is an endogenous purine nucleoside that acts as a coronary vasodilator through activation of G-protein coupled receptors, most notably the A2A receptor which causes vasodilation. It is commonly used diagnostically to induce coronary hyperemia during fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements and therapeutically to terminate supraventricular tachycardias. While generally well tolerated, side effects of adenosine include flushing, dyspnea, chest pain, and heart block.
Dobutamine is recommended as the first-line inotropic agent for patients in cardiogenic shock, according to clinical guidelines. If dobutamine is insufficient, norepinephrine can be added for its vasopressor effects. Vasopressin may also be considered as an adjunct. Close monitoring is needed with inotropes due to risks of arrhythmias and worsening cardiac function. The selection and titration of inotropes and vasopressors should aim to optimize cardiac output and end-organ perfusion while avoiding potential adverse effects.
Vasopressors are drugs that induce vasoconstriction and elevate blood pressure. This document discusses the history, physiology, classification, and pharmacology of various vasopressors used in the ICU setting. It describes how vasopressors act on different adrenergic receptors to increase blood pressure by either increasing cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance, or both. The document reviews commonly used vasopressors like norepinephrine, epinephrine, dopamine, phenylephrine, dobutamine, and ephedrine - outlining their indications, mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, and adverse effects.
This document discusses various inotropes and vasoactive agents used to support hemodynamics. It describes the classification of agents as inotropes, chronotropes, vasopressors, or vasodilators. Key agents covered include dopamine, dobutamine, adrenaline, noradrenaline, milrinone, vasopressin, nitroglycerine, and sodium nitroprusside. For each agent, the document discusses receptor physiology, hemodynamic effects, indications, dosing, side effects, and monitoring considerations. It concludes with describing a vasoactive inotrope score used to quantify cardiovascular support.
This document discusses inotropes and vasopressors used to support the failing heart or peripheral vasculature. It defines inotropes as drugs that increase cardiac contractility and vasopressors as drugs that induce vasoconstriction. Common inotropes and vasopressors discussed include epinephrine, norepinephrine, dopamine, and dopexamine. It provides details on the physiology and pharmacology of these drugs, including their effects on different adrenergic receptors and cardiovascular functions.
This document discusses various types of shock and medications used to treat shock. Shock is defined as inadequate tissue perfusion and oxygenation. Types of shock include septic, cardiogenic, hemorrhagic, and neurogenic shock. Common pressor medications discussed are dopamine, epinephrine, norepinephrine, dobutamine, and vasopressin. Each medication has different effects mediated through alpha and beta receptor stimulation, with some causing vasoconstriction and others increasing cardiac output. Norepinephrine is emerging as a preferred agent for treating septic shock.
This document discusses vasopressors and inotropes, including their physiology, principles of use, individual drugs, and complications. It describes the adrenergic receptor subtypes and how drugs like norepinephrine, epinephrine, dopamine, dobutamine, vasopressin, and inamrinone/milrinone act on them. Norepinephrine is the first-line treatment for septic shock while dobutamine is preferred for cardiogenic shock. Potential complications include hypoperfusion, dysrhythmias, local effects, hyperglycemia. The document provides dosing guidelines and discusses implications for septic shock management.
Inotropes and vasopressors in cardiogenic shockAnwar Yusr
Cardiogenic shock is defined as hypotension and hypoperfusion due to left ventricular dysfunction. Inotropes and vasopressors may be used to increase cardiac output and blood pressure to improve organ perfusion. Dobutamine is an inotrope that also causes vasodilation. Norepinephrine is a potent vasopressor with weak inotropic effects. Levosimendan is a calcium sensitizer that increases contractility while also causing vasodilation. Guidelines recommend considering short-term inotropes for hypotension and hypoperfusion, and norepinephrine if additional vasopressor support is needed. Close monitoring is important due to risks of arrhythmias and ischemia.
This document discusses vasopressor and inotropic agents, including their receptor physiology, pharmacological actions, therapeutic uses, and clinical applications. It provides details on commonly used agents like epinephrine, norepinephrine, dopamine, dobutamine, phenylephrine, vasopressin, and milrinone. It explains their effects on hemodynamics like heart rate, contractility, blood pressure, systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance. It also outlines the advantages and disadvantages as well as indications for use in different shock states and heart conditions.
This document summarizes various inotropic drugs used to increase cardiac contractility including cardiac glycosides like digoxin, catecholamines like dopamine and dobutamine, phosphodiesterase inhibitors like milrinone, and calcium sensitizers like levosimendan. It provides details on their mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, uses, dosages, and side effects. The document focuses on the inotropic and hemodynamic effects of these drugs and their roles in treating low cardiac output states and heart failure.
Inotropic agents work by increasing the force and velocity of cardiac muscle contraction. They are used to improve myocardial function and support circulation in heart failure. Common inotropic agents include cardiac glycosides like digoxin which inhibit Na+-K+-ATPase, beta-adrenergic agonists like dobutamine which stimulate beta-1 receptors, and phosphodiesterase inhibitors like milrinone which increase cAMP levels. While inotropes can provide short-term hemodynamic support, long-term use does not improve survival and may increase mortality in heart failure patients.
This document provides an overview of positive inotropic agents used to treat heart failure. It defines cardiac glycosides like digoxin, which increase the force of myocardial contraction. It also discusses phosphodiesterase inhibitors like milrinone which have positive inotropic and vasodilating effects. Side effects and nursing implications of these drugs are outlined.
This document discusses vasoactive agents and their receptor physiology and clinical applications. It begins by outlining the objectives of understanding vasopressor and inotropic receptor physiology and appropriate clinical use. It then provides background on vasopressors, inotropes, and drugs that have both effects. The majority of the document then discusses the receptor physiology and mechanisms of action of various adrenergic, dopaminergic, and vasopressin receptors. It also covers individual drug classifications, effects, indications, and considerations for agents like epinephrine, norepinephrine, dopamine, dobutamine, milrinone, vasopressin, levosimendan, and vasodilators. Studies comparing agents
THE USE OF INOTROPIC DRUGS IN CARDIAC SURGERYThierry Yunishe
This document provides information on various inotropic drugs used in cardiac surgery, including their indications, mechanisms of action, dosages, and side effects. It discusses sympathomimetic drugs like dopamine, dobutamine, and adrenaline that have positive inotropic effects by stimulating cardiac contraction directly. It also mentions the negative inotrope propranolol and vasopressors like adrenaline and noradrenaline. The aim of using inotropes in cardiac surgery is to optimize cardiac output while using the minimum effective dose to achieve desired outcomes and allow weaning off the drugs.
This document provides an overview and discussion of recent literature on renal replacement therapy (RRT) in intensive care. It summarizes key findings from two important studies from 2008 and 2009 that compared higher vs lower intensity RRT and found no difference in outcomes. It also discusses ongoing questions around optimal timing of RRT initiation and potential roles of biomarkers like NGAL. Modes of RRT like SLED are presented as alternatives to CRRT. While high volume hemofiltration was theorized to help modulate the immune response in sepsis, studies found no clear benefit and it cannot be recommended as standard practice. Ongoing research on biomarkers and optimal dosing and timing is still needed.
This document discusses shock, sepsis management, and fluid resuscitation. It addresses:
1) Types of shock including hypovolemic, distributive, obstructive, cardiogenic, and neurogenic.
2) Principles of fluid resuscitation including increasing preload to improve stroke volume and cardiac output. However, fluid boluses only improve cardiac output in about 50% of ICU patients.
3) Dynamic measures like pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation, passive leg raise, and echocardiography changes after fluid bolus are better than static measures at predicting fluid responsiveness.
Ionotropes and vasopressor use in the EDSCGH ED CME
This document discusses the use of inotropes and vasopressors in the emergency department for management of shock. It provides an overview of different drug classes including their mechanisms of action, dosages, and side effects. Case studies are presented to demonstrate how these drugs may be used in scenarios involving hypotension, shock, and heart block. Key drugs discussed include norepinephrine, dopamine, adrenaline, metaraminol, and isoprenaline. The document emphasizes the importance of determining the type of shock and selecting an appropriate drug to increase cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance, or both depending on the clinical situation.
The document reviews the use of ionotropes in pediatric practice, describing the receptor subtypes targeted by various ionotropic drugs, the pharmacology and effects of individual agents like adrenaline, noradrenaline, dopamine, and dobutamine, important considerations for drug administration, and newer agents like phosphodiesterase inhibitors and vasopressin.
1) The document provides information on inotropes and vasopressors including their classification, sites of action, clinical effects, indications, and doses. It discusses catecholamines like adrenaline, noradrenaline, dopamine, and dobutamine. It also covers phosphodiesterase inhibitors, vasopressin, ephedrine, metaraminol, phenylephrine, methoxamine, and digoxin.
2) The document concludes with recommendations on first and second line vasopressor/inotropic agents for different clinical situations like septic shock, heart failure, cardiogenic shock, anaphylactic shock, and anesthesia-induced hypotension.
1. This document discusses various inotropes and vasopressors used to treat shock states including dobutamine, dopamine, epinephrine, and norepinephrine.
2. It provides guidelines on administering these drugs including desired dose ranges, how to calculate infusion rates, and examples of calculating dobutamine infusion rates.
3. The document also matches different shock states, such as septic shock, cardiogenic shock, and hemorrhagic shock, with recommended first-tier and second-tier drug treatments.
The document defines important terms related to vasoactive drugs and their mechanisms of action. It discusses inotropes, vasopressors, cardiac output, stroke volume, mean arterial pressure, and circulatory shock. It also describes receptors like alpha-1, beta-1, and dopamine D1 receptors. The document provides guidelines for rational use of vasoactive drugs including starting dose, titration, monitoring, and correcting electrolyte imbalances. It also provides methods for calculating dosages of drugs like adrenaline, noradrenaline, and dopamine.
This document provides an overview of vasopressors and inotropes used in critical care to treat shock. It discusses the different types of shock and principles of resuscitation including fluid administration and optimization of oxygen delivery and consumption. It also reviews the mechanisms of action, indications, and side effects of commonly used vasopressors and inotropes like dopamine, dobutamine, milrinone, levophed, phenylephrine, epinephrine, and vasopressin. Case studies are presented to demonstrate how these agents may be applied based on a patient's hemodynamic status.
Adenosine is an endogenous purine nucleoside that acts as a coronary vasodilator through activation of G-protein coupled receptors, most notably the A2A receptor which causes vasodilation. It is commonly used diagnostically to induce coronary hyperemia during fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements and therapeutically to terminate supraventricular tachycardias. While generally well tolerated, side effects of adenosine include flushing, dyspnea, chest pain, and heart block.
Dobutamine is recommended as the first-line inotropic agent for patients in cardiogenic shock, according to clinical guidelines. If dobutamine is insufficient, norepinephrine can be added for its vasopressor effects. Vasopressin may also be considered as an adjunct. Close monitoring is needed with inotropes due to risks of arrhythmias and worsening cardiac function. The selection and titration of inotropes and vasopressors should aim to optimize cardiac output and end-organ perfusion while avoiding potential adverse effects.
Vasopressors are drugs that induce vasoconstriction and elevate blood pressure. This document discusses the history, physiology, classification, and pharmacology of various vasopressors used in the ICU setting. It describes how vasopressors act on different adrenergic receptors to increase blood pressure by either increasing cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance, or both. The document reviews commonly used vasopressors like norepinephrine, epinephrine, dopamine, phenylephrine, dobutamine, and ephedrine - outlining their indications, mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, and adverse effects.
This document discusses various inotropes and vasoactive agents used to support hemodynamics. It describes the classification of agents as inotropes, chronotropes, vasopressors, or vasodilators. Key agents covered include dopamine, dobutamine, adrenaline, noradrenaline, milrinone, vasopressin, nitroglycerine, and sodium nitroprusside. For each agent, the document discusses receptor physiology, hemodynamic effects, indications, dosing, side effects, and monitoring considerations. It concludes with describing a vasoactive inotrope score used to quantify cardiovascular support.
This document discusses inotropes and vasopressors used to support the failing heart or peripheral vasculature. It defines inotropes as drugs that increase cardiac contractility and vasopressors as drugs that induce vasoconstriction. Common inotropes and vasopressors discussed include epinephrine, norepinephrine, dopamine, and dopexamine. It provides details on the physiology and pharmacology of these drugs, including their effects on different adrenergic receptors and cardiovascular functions.
This document discusses various types of shock and medications used to treat shock. Shock is defined as inadequate tissue perfusion and oxygenation. Types of shock include septic, cardiogenic, hemorrhagic, and neurogenic shock. Common pressor medications discussed are dopamine, epinephrine, norepinephrine, dobutamine, and vasopressin. Each medication has different effects mediated through alpha and beta receptor stimulation, with some causing vasoconstriction and others increasing cardiac output. Norepinephrine is emerging as a preferred agent for treating septic shock.
This document discusses vasopressors and inotropes, including their physiology, principles of use, individual drugs, and complications. It describes the adrenergic receptor subtypes and how drugs like norepinephrine, epinephrine, dopamine, dobutamine, vasopressin, and inamrinone/milrinone act on them. Norepinephrine is the first-line treatment for septic shock while dobutamine is preferred for cardiogenic shock. Potential complications include hypoperfusion, dysrhythmias, local effects, hyperglycemia. The document provides dosing guidelines and discusses implications for septic shock management.
Inotropes and vasopressors in cardiogenic shockAnwar Yusr
Cardiogenic shock is defined as hypotension and hypoperfusion due to left ventricular dysfunction. Inotropes and vasopressors may be used to increase cardiac output and blood pressure to improve organ perfusion. Dobutamine is an inotrope that also causes vasodilation. Norepinephrine is a potent vasopressor with weak inotropic effects. Levosimendan is a calcium sensitizer that increases contractility while also causing vasodilation. Guidelines recommend considering short-term inotropes for hypotension and hypoperfusion, and norepinephrine if additional vasopressor support is needed. Close monitoring is important due to risks of arrhythmias and ischemia.
This document discusses vasopressor and inotropic agents, including their receptor physiology, pharmacological actions, therapeutic uses, and clinical applications. It provides details on commonly used agents like epinephrine, norepinephrine, dopamine, dobutamine, phenylephrine, vasopressin, and milrinone. It explains their effects on hemodynamics like heart rate, contractility, blood pressure, systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance. It also outlines the advantages and disadvantages as well as indications for use in different shock states and heart conditions.
This document summarizes various inotropic drugs used to increase cardiac contractility including cardiac glycosides like digoxin, catecholamines like dopamine and dobutamine, phosphodiesterase inhibitors like milrinone, and calcium sensitizers like levosimendan. It provides details on their mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, uses, dosages, and side effects. The document focuses on the inotropic and hemodynamic effects of these drugs and their roles in treating low cardiac output states and heart failure.
Inotropic agents work by increasing the force and velocity of cardiac muscle contraction. They are used to improve myocardial function and support circulation in heart failure. Common inotropic agents include cardiac glycosides like digoxin which inhibit Na+-K+-ATPase, beta-adrenergic agonists like dobutamine which stimulate beta-1 receptors, and phosphodiesterase inhibitors like milrinone which increase cAMP levels. While inotropes can provide short-term hemodynamic support, long-term use does not improve survival and may increase mortality in heart failure patients.
This document provides an overview of positive inotropic agents used to treat heart failure. It defines cardiac glycosides like digoxin, which increase the force of myocardial contraction. It also discusses phosphodiesterase inhibitors like milrinone which have positive inotropic and vasodilating effects. Side effects and nursing implications of these drugs are outlined.
This document discusses vasoactive agents and their receptor physiology and clinical applications. It begins by outlining the objectives of understanding vasopressor and inotropic receptor physiology and appropriate clinical use. It then provides background on vasopressors, inotropes, and drugs that have both effects. The majority of the document then discusses the receptor physiology and mechanisms of action of various adrenergic, dopaminergic, and vasopressin receptors. It also covers individual drug classifications, effects, indications, and considerations for agents like epinephrine, norepinephrine, dopamine, dobutamine, milrinone, vasopressin, levosimendan, and vasodilators. Studies comparing agents
THE USE OF INOTROPIC DRUGS IN CARDIAC SURGERYThierry Yunishe
This document provides information on various inotropic drugs used in cardiac surgery, including their indications, mechanisms of action, dosages, and side effects. It discusses sympathomimetic drugs like dopamine, dobutamine, and adrenaline that have positive inotropic effects by stimulating cardiac contraction directly. It also mentions the negative inotrope propranolol and vasopressors like adrenaline and noradrenaline. The aim of using inotropes in cardiac surgery is to optimize cardiac output while using the minimum effective dose to achieve desired outcomes and allow weaning off the drugs.
This document provides an overview and discussion of recent literature on renal replacement therapy (RRT) in intensive care. It summarizes key findings from two important studies from 2008 and 2009 that compared higher vs lower intensity RRT and found no difference in outcomes. It also discusses ongoing questions around optimal timing of RRT initiation and potential roles of biomarkers like NGAL. Modes of RRT like SLED are presented as alternatives to CRRT. While high volume hemofiltration was theorized to help modulate the immune response in sepsis, studies found no clear benefit and it cannot be recommended as standard practice. Ongoing research on biomarkers and optimal dosing and timing is still needed.
This document discusses shock, sepsis management, and fluid resuscitation. It addresses:
1) Types of shock including hypovolemic, distributive, obstructive, cardiogenic, and neurogenic.
2) Principles of fluid resuscitation including increasing preload to improve stroke volume and cardiac output. However, fluid boluses only improve cardiac output in about 50% of ICU patients.
3) Dynamic measures like pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation, passive leg raise, and echocardiography changes after fluid bolus are better than static measures at predicting fluid responsiveness.
This document discusses sepsis and septic shock. It defines sepsis as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. Septic shock involves circulatory and metabolic abnormalities that increase mortality risk. The document reviews signs, laboratory findings, scoring systems, management principles, and treatment approaches for sepsis and septic shock such as early antibiotics, fluid resuscitation, vasopressors, inotropes, and glycemic control. The goal of treatment is to recognize sepsis early and provide timely, targeted resuscitation to improve outcomes.
1) Acute kidney injury commonly occurs in critical illness and is a predictor of adverse outcomes. Common causes include renal hypoperfusion, SIRS, nephrotoxic drugs, and contrast nephropathy.
2) Early volume expansion is recommended to correct extracellular volume depletion, though certain colloids may impair renal function. Diuretics do not improve outcomes and increase side effects.
3) Maintaining an MAP of at least 60-65mmHg with vasopressors is recommended, and vasodilators like fenoldopam may benefit renal function. Tight glycemic control may reduce acute kidney injury in surgical ICU patients.
Journal Club Group fffffffffffffffffffffff1.pptxMyThaoAiDoan
This journal club discusses a randomized controlled trial that compared a restrictive fluid strategy with early vasopressor use to a liberal fluid strategy in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension. The trial found no significant difference in mortality before discharge home by day 90 between the two strategies. Some strengths were its randomized design and excellent safety outcome reporting. Limitations included being unblinded and possibly underpowered. The results do not strongly support changing clinical practice but add to evidence that a restrictive fluid approach may be safe.
1. Atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD) is a congenital heart defect where there is a common atrioventricular valve, defects in the atrial and ventricular septum, and it can be complete or partial. It accounts for around 5% of congenital heart defects.
2. Perioperative management of complete AVSD aims to address issues like pulmonary hypertension, low cardiac output, and arrhythmias. Optimal timing of repair is between 3-6 months of age when weight is over 4kg.
3. Expected early postoperative outcomes include a median hospital stay of 9 days, potential need for reoperation for valve issues or outflow tract obstruction, and low mortality rates in the
Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated response to infection. Early identification and treatment improves outcomes. The document outlines recommendations for screening and managing sepsis in three steps: 1) Screening and managing the initial infection. 2) Screening for organ dysfunction. 3) Identifying and managing initial hypotension. Key recommendations include administering broad-spectrum antibiotics within 1 hour, using lactate levels and qSOFA to identify organ dysfunction, giving 30mL/kg crystalloids for hypotension and lactate over 4mmol/L, and applying vasopressors like norepinephrine to maintain a MAP over 65mmHg.
A 39-year-old woman presented with a severe headache and was found to have signs of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) on further examination and testing. Her level of consciousness then deteriorated and she had a seizure. A repeat head CT showed rebleeding of the SAH along with acute hydrocephalus. Initial management of SAH involves controlling blood pressure, treating hydrocephalus if present, securing the aneurysm within 24 hours to prevent rebleeding, and administering nimodipine to prevent cerebral vasospasm. Close monitoring is needed for any further neurological changes or complications.
The Next Generation in Managing Emergency Department Patients: Non-Invasive Cardiac Output.
Jennifer Williams, MSN, RN, ACNS-BC, CEN, Clinical Nurse Specialist, Barnes-Jewish Hospital. Emergency Services
Assessment and management of shock in acute trauma setting based on ATLS recommendations .Lecture given in Trauma update at Perintalmanna on19th August 2014.
Sepsis and septic shock result from a dysregulated host response to infection that leads to organ dysfunction. Management involves immediate resuscitation within 1 hour with IV fluids, antibiotics, and vasopressors if needed. Ongoing care includes source control, frequent reassessment of volume status, and supportive care such as mechanical ventilation and nutrition. The goals are to treat the underlying infection while supporting failing organs until the host response normalizes. Sepsis affects millions worldwide and requires swift treatment to prevent progression to septic shock and death.
This document summarizes key points from a presentation on managing septic shock given by Dr. R. Phillip Dellinger. It discusses definitions of sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock. It reviews guidelines from the Surviving Sepsis Campaign for initial resuscitation, including administering antibiotics within 1 hour, achieving hemodynamic goals, and considering early goal-directed therapy. Vasopressor choices of norepinephrine and dopamine are recommended. Steroids may be considered for nonresponsive shock. Activated protein C was previously suggested but is no longer recommended. Guidelines aim to improve care through protocols and performance improvement programs.
This document discusses principles of perioperative management of common surgical procedures for high-risk patients. It notes that after surgery, metabolic demands increase which can cause issues for patients with limited cardiorespiratory reserve. It identifies surgery-specific and comorbidity-related high risk factors. It provides guidelines for preoperative evaluation including history, exams, labs and identifying risk levels. It also outlines optimization of common medical conditions in the preoperative period such as cardiovascular, respiratory, renal and nutritional issues.
hemodynamicstabilisationinsepticshock-090814084800-phpapp01.pptxDr Shabeer D
This document discusses hemodynamic stabilization in septic shock. It defines shock and septic shock, noting that septic shock involves abnormalities in the delivery and utilization of oxygen at the cellular level rather than just hypotension. It emphasizes the importance of optimizing macrocirculation through fluid resuscitation and vasopressors while also addressing microcirculatory and mitochondrial distress that occurs in septic shock patients. The document recommends using tools like echocardiography, cardiac output monitoring, mixed venous oxygen saturation, and assessment of the microcirculation to fully evaluate hemodynamics and guide resuscitation efforts in septic shock.
1) Damage control resuscitation (DCR) aims to halt the deadly triad of acidosis, hypothermia and coagulopathy in bleeding patients, unlike conventional resuscitation which tries to treat the triad after it occurs.
2) Key aspects of DCR include early use of plasma and blood products in a 1:1:1 ratio of PRBCs, FFP and platelets to correct coagulopathy, permissive hypotension to avoid excess fluid administration, and addressing occult hypoperfusion through measures like base deficit and lactate levels.
3) The end point of resuscitation should be normalization of base deficit or lactate, rather than just restoring normal vital signs
Cardiopulmonary bypass in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease requires special considerations due to physiological differences from adults. These include smaller blood volumes, higher oxygen demands, and the presence of intracardiac and extracardiac shunting. The bypass plan must account for the specific anatomy and physiology of each patient's heart defect to ensure adequate perfusion and protection during surgery. Flow rates, temperature management, venting strategies, and cardioplegia administration may need to be modified from standard adult protocols. Close monitoring is important to detect any issues with oxygen delivery or end-organ perfusion during bypass.
- The document describes several case studies involving patients with heart failure:
- The first case involves a 62-year-old woman admitted for acute decompensated heart failure. After 5 days of IV diuresis resulting in weight loss of 8L, her creatinine increased. The best next step would be to stop IV diuresis and re-check labs the next day.
- The second case describes a 74-year-old man with heart failure who was readmitted for worsening symptoms. He underwent evaluation and was found to have constrictive pericarditis, which was treated with surgery.
- The document provides details on these cases and discusses topics like diagnosing and treating acute
The patient is a 49-year-old woman with end-stage renal disease and diabetes who presented with altered mental status. She receives hemodialysis three times per week for a few years. Recently, she has been increasingly tired, weak, and unable to perform daily activities with poor appetite and nausea. On examination, she was pale and swollen with low hemoglobin. Tests found elevated creatinine, BUN, and electrolyte abnormalities. The most probable diagnosis is inadequate hemodialysis, as her symptoms and labs are consistent with worsening uremia due to insufficient solute clearance from her dialysis sessions. Kt/V is a measure of dialysis adequacy that accounts for urea clearance and patient
Shock is caused by inadequate systemic oxygen delivery that activates autonomic responses to maintain circulation. The main types of shock are hypovolemic, septic, cardiogenic, anaphylactic, neurogenic, and obstructive. Treatment focuses on airway control, oxygen delivery, circulation optimization through fluid resuscitation, and achieving hemodynamic goals to restore tissue perfusion. Early goal directed therapy for septic shock involving aggressive fluid administration and inotropes improves outcomes.
This document provides an overview of a seminar on advanced cardiovascular life support (ACLS) algorithms and interventions for cardiac arrest. The seminar will cover rhythms that can cause cardiac arrest, monitoring during CPR, establishing vascular access, advanced airways, medications for arrest rhythms, and interventions not recommended for routine use. Key points include: the importance of high-quality CPR and timely defibrillation to increase return of spontaneous circulation and survival; using vasopressors, amiodarone, or lidocaine for refractory rhythms; monitoring end-tidal CO2, coronary perfusion pressure, and central venous oxygen saturation to guide CPR quality; and avoiding routines use of atropine, calcium,
This document provides an overview of arrhythmias for medical residents. It outlines an approach to classifying arrhythmias based on rate, regularity, and QRS width. Specific arrhythmias covered include sinus bradycardia, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, ventricular tachycardia, and various types of heart block. The document also discusses how to determine if a wide complex tachycardia requires cardioversion or defibrillation versus medical treatment. Examples of EKGs are provided for different arrhythmias.
This document provides an introduction to EKG interpretation and outlines the systematic approach of evaluating an EKG. It covers the key components to assess, including rate, rhythm, axis, conduction abnormalities, and morphology. Specific conditions are reviewed such as sinus rhythm, bundle branch blocks, AV blocks, ischemia, and infarction. Examples are provided throughout to demonstrate application of the principles. The overall goal is to understand the fundamentals of the EKG and systematically analyze it following the standard approach of rate, rhythm, axis, conduction, morphology.
This document provides an overview of congestive heart failure, including definitions, types, classification, time course, and treatment strategies. It defines CHF as a syndrome most commonly caused by cardiomyopathy. It describes types as right or left heart failure, and with reduced or preserved ejection fraction. Treatment objectives for acute CHF are to decrease congestion and increase perfusion, while chronic CHF aims to slow functional decline. Key medications that improve mortality in chronic CHF include ACE inhibitors, beta blockers, aldosterone antagonists, and ARNI.
This document discusses key concepts for understanding medical tests, including sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and how to construct a contingency table. It begins by defining sensitivity as the percentage of true positives among those with the disease, and specificity as the percentage of true negatives among those without the disease. Prevalence affects the numbers in the contingency table. Positive and negative predictive values depend on prevalence in addition to sensitivity and specificity. Examples are used to illustrate these concepts for different diseases and testing scenarios.
This document provides an overview of an evidence-based medicine seminar. It discusses using medical literature to help make better clinical decisions. The learning objectives are to understand EBM, ask clinical questions, understand different types of medical literature and validity, apply Bayes' theorem to diagnosis, understand metrics for treatment effects, and access secondary sources. It emphasizes using a structured approach to ask, acquire, assess, and apply evidence to answer clinical questions.
This document provides guidance to residents on productive scholarly work and mentorship. It outlines the scholarly activity requirement, importance of mentorship, timeline for research projects, and types of projects residents should consider. These include case reports, quality improvement projects, retrospective research, reviews, editorials, and education/teaching projects. Choosing a project aligned with career goals and that has support from a mentor will maximize the chances of a successful scholarly experience.
This document outlines the structure and approach for presenting and discussing a patient case, including defining the problem representation, generating a differential diagnosis, presenting pertinent history, exam findings, labs/imaging, investigations, diagnosis, and management. Key aspects include updating the problem representation and differential with each new piece of information, and separating the diagnostic "signal" from irrelevant "noise".
The document provides guidance for medical residents on handling on-call duties, including tips for sign-out, answering calls, and protocols for managing the five most common and five scariest call scenarios. It outlines approaches for prioritizing tasks, responding to and triaging calls, and standardized processes for issues like insomnia, nausea, pain, constipation, high blood pressure, NPO restrictions, patients leaving AMA, abnormal heart rhythms, and managing insulin. The goal is to equip residents with effective strategies and decision-making frameworks for their on-call responsibilities.
This document discusses SARS-CoV-2 transmission and characteristics. It addresses how the virus can spread through small aerosols or large droplets, and the protective measures appropriate for each. It also examines the virus's ability to spread before symptoms appear and challenges for contact tracing. Additionally, it covers the reproductive number of the virus and importance of identifying mild and asymptomatic cases.
This document discusses challenges related to rationing care and crisis standards during the COVID-19 pandemic. It presents two cases where a hospital is at capacity and needs to decide whether to remove a patient from a ventilator or withhold intubation to reallocate the ventilator to other patients with better prognoses. It also discusses the ethics of prioritizing the needs of individual patients versus the wider population and proposes establishing crisis triage teams to make difficult resource allocation decisions impartially. The document further examines precedents for rationing healthcare resources like dialysis and transplants as well as who should receive priority for scarce COVID vaccines. It also outlines Utah's crisis standards of care plan implemented by the governor during public health emergencies
This document provides a guide to COVID-19 testing. It discusses PCR testing and its sensitivity of over 85%. Sensitivity measures how often a test correctly identifies those with the disease, while positive predictive value depends on disease prevalence. Likelihood ratios are used to determine pre-test and post-test probability. Examples are given of using test results and likelihood ratios to determine the probability a patient has COVID-19. CT scans are not recommended for diagnosing COVID-19 due to their low sensitivity. Symptoms and risk factors should be used to determine pre-test probability to correlate with test results.
The document provides guidance on using imaging for COVID-19, including when it is useful, what findings to look for on chest x-ray and CT scan, and why clinical history is important. It discusses that imaging is not recommended for screening but can help evaluate symptoms. Chest x-ray may show patchy, peripheral, bilateral opacities while CT scan commonly shows peripheral ground glass opacities. Radiologists need full clinical history to properly interpret imaging studies.
This document discusses the analysis and management of pleural fluid and pancreaticopleural fistulas. It outlines criteria for distinguishing transudative, exudative, and lymphatic pleural effusions. It notes that amylase-rich pleural fluid could indicate a pancreatic or cancerous origin, and diagnostic testing of pleural fluid has about a 50% yield for detecting cancer. Management options for pancreaticopleural fistulas include observation for spontaneous resolution in 40-60% of cases within 6 weeks, octreotide to lower output, enteral feeding, and stent placement which can resolve the fistula in 55-90% of cases.
A 74-year-old woman on immunosuppressive medications for oral lichen planus presented with worsening respiratory failure after being treated for hypercalcemia. Initial tests showed increased oxygen needs and abnormal chest x-ray. She was diagnosed with Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) based on a positive PCR test of her lungs. PJP is a fungal infection that causes pneumonia in immunocompromised patients. While her symptoms began with hypercalcemia, it is possible the underlying cause was an atypical infection like PJP leading to abnormal vitamin D activation. She was treated successfully for PJP with antibiotics and steroids.
This document describes efforts at the University of Utah and George E Wahlen VA Medical Center to decrease time to treatment for acute stroke patients. It outlines the previous disorganized stroke response process and near misses. The new standardized "Brain Attack" order set and protocol aims to promptly activate the on-call neurology team, contact the radiology reading room for after-hours imaging, and streamline the workflow to reduce delays. It provides an overview of the updated stroke response steps to recognize symptoms, activate the order set, perform assessments, image interpretation, and determine treatment. The goal is to improve reliability and allow for potential reperfusion therapies.
ESA/ACT Science Coffee: Diego Blas - Gravitational wave detection with orbita...Advanced-Concepts-Team
Presentation in the Science Coffee of the Advanced Concepts Team of the European Space Agency on the 07.06.2024.
Speaker: Diego Blas (IFAE/ICREA)
Title: Gravitational wave detection with orbital motion of Moon and artificial
Abstract:
In this talk I will describe some recent ideas to find gravitational waves from supermassive black holes or of primordial origin by studying their secular effect on the orbital motion of the Moon or satellites that are laser ranged.
Or: Beyond linear.
Abstract: Equivariant neural networks are neural networks that incorporate symmetries. The nonlinear activation functions in these networks result in interesting nonlinear equivariant maps between simple representations, and motivate the key player of this talk: piecewise linear representation theory.
Disclaimer: No one is perfect, so please mind that there might be mistakes and typos.
dtubbenhauer@gmail.com
Corrected slides: dtubbenhauer.com/talks.html
Authoring a personal GPT for your research and practice: How we created the Q...Leonel Morgado
Thematic analysis in qualitative research is a time-consuming and systematic task, typically done using teams. Team members must ground their activities on common understandings of the major concepts underlying the thematic analysis, and define criteria for its development. However, conceptual misunderstandings, equivocations, and lack of adherence to criteria are challenges to the quality and speed of this process. Given the distributed and uncertain nature of this process, we wondered if the tasks in thematic analysis could be supported by readily available artificial intelligence chatbots. Our early efforts point to potential benefits: not just saving time in the coding process but better adherence to criteria and grounding, by increasing triangulation between humans and artificial intelligence. This tutorial will provide a description and demonstration of the process we followed, as two academic researchers, to develop a custom ChatGPT to assist with qualitative coding in the thematic data analysis process of immersive learning accounts in a survey of the academic literature: QUAL-E Immersive Learning Thematic Analysis Helper. In the hands-on time, participants will try out QUAL-E and develop their ideas for their own qualitative coding ChatGPT. Participants that have the paid ChatGPT Plus subscription can create a draft of their assistants. The organizers will provide course materials and slide deck that participants will be able to utilize to continue development of their custom GPT. The paid subscription to ChatGPT Plus is not required to participate in this workshop, just for trying out personal GPTs during it.
PPT on Direct Seeded Rice presented at the three-day 'Training and Validation Workshop on Modules of Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) Technologies in South Asia' workshop on April 22, 2024.
The binding of cosmological structures by massless topological defectsSérgio Sacani
Assuming spherical symmetry and weak field, it is shown that if one solves the Poisson equation or the Einstein field
equations sourced by a topological defect, i.e. a singularity of a very specific form, the result is a localized gravitational
field capable of driving flat rotation (i.e. Keplerian circular orbits at a constant speed for all radii) of test masses on a thin
spherical shell without any underlying mass. Moreover, a large-scale structure which exploits this solution by assembling
concentrically a number of such topological defects can establish a flat stellar or galactic rotation curve, and can also deflect
light in the same manner as an equipotential (isothermal) sphere. Thus, the need for dark matter or modified gravity theory is
mitigated, at least in part.
The debris of the ‘last major merger’ is dynamically youngSérgio Sacani
The Milky Way’s (MW) inner stellar halo contains an [Fe/H]-rich component with highly eccentric orbits, often referred to as the
‘last major merger.’ Hypotheses for the origin of this component include Gaia-Sausage/Enceladus (GSE), where the progenitor
collided with the MW proto-disc 8–11 Gyr ago, and the Virgo Radial Merger (VRM), where the progenitor collided with the
MW disc within the last 3 Gyr. These two scenarios make different predictions about observable structure in local phase space,
because the morphology of debris depends on how long it has had to phase mix. The recently identified phase-space folds in Gaia
DR3 have positive caustic velocities, making them fundamentally different than the phase-mixed chevrons found in simulations
at late times. Roughly 20 per cent of the stars in the prograde local stellar halo are associated with the observed caustics. Based
on a simple phase-mixing model, the observed number of caustics are consistent with a merger that occurred 1–2 Gyr ago.
We also compare the observed phase-space distribution to FIRE-2 Latte simulations of GSE-like mergers, using a quantitative
measurement of phase mixing (2D causticality). The observed local phase-space distribution best matches the simulated data
1–2 Gyr after collision, and certainly not later than 3 Gyr. This is further evidence that the progenitor of the ‘last major merger’
did not collide with the MW proto-disc at early times, as is thought for the GSE, but instead collided with the MW disc within
the last few Gyr, consistent with the body of work surrounding the VRM.
When I was asked to give a companion lecture in support of ‘The Philosophy of Science’ (https://shorturl.at/4pUXz) I decided not to walk through the detail of the many methodologies in order of use. Instead, I chose to employ a long standing, and ongoing, scientific development as an exemplar. And so, I chose the ever evolving story of Thermodynamics as a scientific investigation at its best.
Conducted over a period of >200 years, Thermodynamics R&D, and application, benefitted from the highest levels of professionalism, collaboration, and technical thoroughness. New layers of application, methodology, and practice were made possible by the progressive advance of technology. In turn, this has seen measurement and modelling accuracy continually improved at a micro and macro level.
Perhaps most importantly, Thermodynamics rapidly became a primary tool in the advance of applied science/engineering/technology, spanning micro-tech, to aerospace and cosmology. I can think of no better a story to illustrate the breadth of scientific methodologies and applications at their best.
3. Road Map
• When to start vasopressors
1. Is this patient’s BP too low?
2. Why is this patient’s BP low?
3. How should I bring this patient’s BP up?
• What vasopressor to use (the easy part)
• Practical considerations
• When to use adjuncts to NE
• How to use peripheral pressors
4. Case 1
• 64M with T2DM and chronic dry flaky skin on his feet. He comes in
with R non-purulent cellulitis. Receives 30cc/kg LR in the ED, then is
admitted to medicine.
• 1h after admission, RN pages you that his BP is 90 / 40 (MAP 60).
What do you want to do?
5. When to start vasopressors
Steps to decide when to start vasopressors:
1. Is this patient’s BP too low?
2. Why is this patient’s BP low?
3. How should I bring this patient’s BP up?
6. Is this patient’s BP too low?
BP target = open question in ICU
medicine
• Mean Arterial Pressure of 65 mmHg =
classic teaching (e.g. Surviving Sepsis)
• Should we tailor to baseline
BP/comorbidities?
• Mechanistic rationalization but has not
been demonstrated empirically.
Beware: BP =/= Perfusion
Can you think of a way BP can go up and
perfusion goes down?
7. Is it real?
• Assess Mental status, urine output, cap refill,
lactate, gestalt.
• Avoid sedating meds in patients with borderline BP
• lose ability to monitor (and often cause hypotension)
• You probably don’t need an arterial line…
Duration of hypotension is important
• “[Ischemic] Time is Brain”
• “[Hypotensive] Time is Organ Function”
Increasing time with perfusion
deficit = increased risk of adverse
kidney event. MPP = Mean
Perfusion Pressure
Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2020
https://www.atsjournals.org/doi/ab
s/10.1164/rccm.201912-2316OC
8.
9. When to start vasopressors
Steps to decide when to start vasopressors:
1. Is this patient’s BP too low?
2. Why is this patient’s BP low?
3. How should I bring this patient’s BP up?
11. When to start vasopressors
Steps to decide when to start vasopressors:
1. Is this patient’s BP too low?
2. Why is this patient’s BP low?
3. How should I bring this patient’s BP up?
12. Case 1b
• 64M with T2DM and chronic dry flaky skin on his feet. He comes in
with R non-purulent cellulitis syncope and BRBPR, which is ongoing.
Receives 30cc/kg LR in the ED, then is admitted to medicine.
• 1h after admission, RN pages you that his BP is 85 / 50 (MAP 60).
What do you want to do?
13. Why is this patient’s BP low?
Obstructive Shock
• Tamponade
• PE
• Tension Pneumothorax
Remove the obstruction
Distributive Shock
• Sepsis – Antibiotics, Source Control
• Pancreatitis
• Neurogenic
• Anaphylactic
Vasopressors
Hypovolemic Shock
• Hemorrhagic shock
• Diarrhea
• Insensible Losses
Replace volume
Cardiogenic Shock
• Valve
• Arrythmia
• Cardiomyopathy
Fix or augment the pump
14. Case 2
• 70M presents with urinary retention, fever, AMS. Initially normal BP.
UA with WBC and bacteriuria – started on broad spectrum antibiotics.
BP tanks after the patient is admitted despite 2L LR. You suspect E
Coli bacteremia, with worsening shock as endotoxin is released.
Lactate is 5 mmol/l. You have a trainee on your team who asks…
• “Lactate is elevated because not enough O2 is being delivered to the
tissues… LR doesn’t carry any oxygen, and NE works by raising
vascular resistance which ought to lower flow… how would either of
these help?”
• How would you respond?
15. Mechanism of improved DO2
(SV * HR) = CO = MAP-CVP / SVR:
• Isolated increase in SVR would make CO drop?
Non-LV-cardiogenic shock states, Venous return is
commonly the limiting step (blood pools in dilated
veins)
• Unstressed volume: no increase in pressure as more
added.
• In health: 85% of total volume
• Stressed volume: pressure increases as volume
added, so increases venous return.
• In health: 15% of volume.
16. Mechanism of improved DO2
Venous return is
proportional to the stressed
volume
• Fluids: increase stressed
volume by increasing
overall volume
• Vasopressors: move
unstressed volume to
stressed volume
(venoconstricting =
tightening the tube)
DOI: 10.4103/ija.IJA_209_17
MSFP: mean systemic filling pressure (in the venules)
VR: Venous return
17. Case 3
• 70F with OA on NSAIDs who has reduced PO intake for 1 week due to
epigastric pain. Acute onset 10/10 abd pain night of presentation.
Rigid on the gurney
• Taken to OR – perf’ed ulcer, gets Gram Patch, admitted afterward with
secondary peritonitis. 30cc/kg LR. Lactate is 8 mmol/L. MAP is 60
mmHg
• What do you do? Fluids or vasopressors?
18. Sepsis: how much fluids?
• Hypovolemia due to: reduced PO, increased insensible losses/fever,
3rd space losses due to vascular permeability).
• Replete based on duration of symptoms, severity of reduced intake, etc.
• Vasodilated due to: endothelial injury, altered vascular tone
• Surviving Sepsis: 30 ml/kg. However, this has not (yet) been tested
• Comes from Observational data, trial protocols (e.g. Early Goal Directed
Therapy – PROCESS, ARISE trials), and common practice
19. Sepsis
• Paradigm: ”Fluids first, then NE if refractory hypotension”
• CENSER Trial: Should patients get both (fluids, pressors) up front?
• blinded RCT
• 0.05 mcg/kg/min NE x 24h through PIV vs placebo & std of care (surviving
sepsis)
• Outcome: Improvement in shock
• 65+ MAP and 0.5L/kg/hr UOP or 10% drop in lactate in 6h
• 76.1% NE vs 48.4% Placebo. No problem with adverse effects.
Clovers: June 2021. PETAL Network RCT
of Vasopressors first with rescue fluids vs
fluids first vs rescue vasopressors
20. Case 3
• 70F with OA on NSAIDs who has reduced PO intake for 1 week due to
epigastric pain. Acute onset 10/10 abd pain night of presentation.
Rigid on the gurney
• Taken to OR – perf’ed ulcer, gets Gram Patch, admitted afterward with
secondary peritonitis. 30cc/kg LR. Lactate is 8 mmol/L. MAP is 60
mmHg
• You decide to give another 1L of fluids. MAP increases to 70, then
trends down to 60 mmHg over then next hour.
• Do you continue to give more fluids?
21. ‘Fluid responsiveness’, Resuscitation Targets
• Organizational and mental barriers to starting vasopressors
• Sepsis 3 septic shock definition: ‘Requires vasopressors’
• If BP increases with fluids (or + NICOM), should you give more?
• To maintain 20% increase in intravascular volume (1L), 2-3L of fluid are going
to end up in the interstitium and tissues
More fluids = Worse outcomes (observational)
• Malbrain et al, 2014 meta-analysis
Resuscitation targets: unknown if helpful
• Lactate (if elevated, give more IVF?)
• Mixed Venous O2 (invasive, no better)
• Cap Refill (as good as lactate,
ANDROMEDA-SHOCK)
22. Road Map
• When to start vasopressors
1. Is this patient’s BP too low?
2. Why is this patient’s BP low?
3. How should I bring this patient’s BP up?
• What vasopressor to use (the easy part)
• Practical considerations
• When to use adjuncts to NE
• How to use peripheral pressors
23. Use Norepinephrine
Norepinephrine Epinephrine Vasopressin Phenylephrine
Action Alpha1 - vasoconstriction
Beta1 - contractility
Alpha1 - “
Beta1 – “
Beta2 – inotropic
effect.
V1 receptor Alpha1 – “
*Beta1 – “
Use First line, generally • Relative bradycardia
• Low cardiac output
• Anaphylaxis
• Pure
vasoconstrictor.
• Used as adjunct
Physiologically VERY
similar to NE
Dosage • Start at 0.04 mcg/kg/min
• There is no maximum dose
Gtt: same as NE
Push dose: 1mg (only
for use in arrest, 5-
10min)
0.04 U (no titration
because half-life is 30
minutes)
Push dose: 100 mcg
(10-20 min)
24. Use Norepinephrine
No solid evidence suggesting NE is
best
• Vaso 1st: VANISH trial, equivalent
• Epi 1st: CAT trial, equivalent
NE is logistically convenient.
Titrate q5-15 minutes
25. Road Map
• When to start vasopressors
1. Is this patient’s BP too low?
2. Why is this patient’s BP low?
3. How should I bring this patient’s BP up?
• What vasopressor to use (the easy part)
• Practical considerations
• When to use adjuncts to NE
• How to use peripheral pressors
26. Adjuncts
Common practice pattern: once NE at 0.20 mcg/kg/min.
• consider adding Vasopressin 0.04U, no titration, based on VASST trial
(no benefit, but post-hoc analysis most useful in that range)
• Stress dose steroids (hydrocortisone 100 mg q8 or 50 mg q6)
• Consider central venous catheter and arterial line
27. Do you need a central line?
• Pittard, 2013: RCT of 135 vs 128 pts randomized peripheral vs
central. Most frequent PIV complication = couldn't start.
Allowed 33.3+ mcg/min
NE. DOI: 10.1177/0310057X1704500614
• Tian, 2019: Systematic review extravasation rate: 3.4%, but
no true adverse outcomes in about 1500 patients. DOI
10.1111/1742-6723.13406
• Cardenas-Garcia, 2015: Cohort of 734 ICU received mean
duration 49+/- 22 hours, max 72h of peripheral pressors: 2%
had extravasation , none had lasting damage, 13% eventually
needed central line. DOI: 10.1002/jhm.2394
• Loubani, 2015: Systematic review: average time to
extravasation = 35h DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.01.014
• Midlines: controversial. Data soon.
Compared to central venous catheter complication rates:
3SITES study, NEJM
28. How to do peripheral pressors
• You need to know about the IV
• Best: 18g or 20g in AC fossa or proximal (less risk, and less
risk of damage)
• protocoled extremity check (e.g. q2h)
• must flush and draw without pain
• Not US guided placement (this means was hard, and is
usually deeper and thus harder to monitor for
extravasation)
• Don't have BP cuff on that arm.
• If extravasation: administer SQ phentolamine (0.1-
0.2 mg/kg up to 10) and possibly nitroglycerin paste.
• If their BP drops: Check their arm
• This is the main reason to place CVC as dose increases –
reliable access
PIV
TODO:
[ ] split in to 3 smaller sub-talks
Increase emphasis on the questions:
Question 1 around BP targets: MAP 65 with SBP 100 vs 85
Question 2 around mechanism of increased DO2 with vasopressor use (stressed volume increase, inotropy) – use data supporting increase in DO2 in stem
Question 3 Peripheral Pressors
Question 4 art line reliability? In comparison between NIBP, Radial, and Femoral
Question 5 titration of vasopressors.
Learning objectives:
There are probably some small refinements to this, but they generally haven’t been empirically demonstrated and only apply in the minority of cases.
80/20 rule based approach
Just do it: cognitive effort to reclassify as now “in shock” – feels like a big transition, but really it’s a continuum.
Emphasis on Sepsis
Vasopressors themselves are relatively simple: when to use is hard.
Pareto Principle
Applied: Focus on the 20% of the decisions that lead to 80% of the improved outcomes
There’s a lot we don’t know – Equipoise remains
Don’t get bogged down in the physiology, controversies, small choices
Good care = reliable delivery of the things we do know
Use a Group A strep cellulitis -> toxic shock syndrome case – classic for starting out OK, then progressing to shock.
Personalized BP targets?
Rationale: Among patients with chronic hypertension, a rightward shift of the curve for organ pressure-flow autoregulation is expected, which means that an increased mean arterial pressure could hypothetically result in improved organ perfusion - Strandgaard S, Olesen J, Skinhoj E, Lassen NA. Autoregulation of brain circulation in severe arterial hypertension. Br Med J 1973;1:507-510
doi: 10.1164/rccm.202004-1124ED
They Advocate for
80+ if baseline hypertension (argument: less kidney injury in this group)
65 in undifferentiated
<65 if baseline hypotension (to my knowledge, no solid empirical evidence here)
‘Relative Hypotension’: stiff vessels, fall off the autoregulation curve despite nominally ok BP
Baseline hypotension: cirrhosis. Younger, smaller, female.
Well tolerated hypotension: anecdotally: tamponade / CHF
TODO: Hypotension and mortality: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24887489/
Mechanisms that sedatives cause hypotension:
-direct med effects
-loss of adrenergic tone
"[Ischemic] Time is Brain" :: "[Hypotensive] Time is Kidney”
Use MAP for all inpatient medicine – it’s what the cuff measures (less error), and is more tightly linked to outcomes (whether using cuff or art line) - MAP reflects the mean perfusion pressure.
Wide pulse pressure – adjust blood pressure target? (e.g. 100 / 30) No evidence that we should change the target. Trust the MAP
Note: radial arterial lines likely significantly underestimate the central BP (e.g. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28523028/) – if you need to know, go for fem or axillary. The degree of uncertainty between Cuff => Radial is about the same for Radial => Fem, in general.
“Cuff vs. radial A-line: The 95% confidence interval of the MAP measured using an oscollometric noninvasive BP cuff is roughly +/- 12 mm when compared to a radial A-line.
Radial A-line vs. femoral A-line: The 95% confidence interval of the MAP measured with a radial A-line appears to range between ~5 mm higher and ~15 mm lower that measured with a femoral artery A-line. Among sicker patients on higher vasopressor doses, correlation may be worse.” IBCC
Femoral is probably “gold standard” because it reflects the renal perfusion pressure, which is usually the first organ to lose autoregulation as Bp drops (classical teaching: Renal 65-70, Heart and CNS 50, Gut slightly lower. Obviously depends on atherosclerosis, chronic HTN, etc.)
Don’t miss this. All management will be incorrect if you mis-diagnose the reason for hypotension.
Hemorrhagic Shock = give volume back.
Give blood – don’t wait for Hgb to drop if they are in shock (blood won’t necessarily have equilibrated yet)
Infusion rate
Cordis 8.5F > Shiley > 16g PIV > 7F CVC > 18g PIV >... > 24g PIV > 18g PICC
Can temporize with vasopressors (better than leaving them hypotensive while you wait for blood
Analogy – inflating a bike tire or sleeping pad. Pressure only starts to build once you’ve expanded the tubing/pad.
SCCM guidelines do support that increasing NE dose to higher target increases output (page 311) in several studies – so the presumption is supported. Likely due to increasing venous return (and some improvement in contractility)
Another take:
“However, lactate is not a marker of tissue perfusion: Increases in the serum lactate level may represent tissue hypoxia, accelerated aerobic glycolysis driven by excess beta-adrenergic stimulation, or other causes (e.g., liver failure)”
Levy B (2006) Lactate and shock state: the metabolic view. Curr Opin Crit Care. 12(4):315–321
Of course, increasing the Cardiac Output will then lead to increased blood pressure if the vascular resistance remains the same (or increases). This brings up the point, then, if BP is totally incidental to delivery of oxygen? Probably not, as the true role of blood pressure (e.g. why we are not evolved with a BP of 40/20 with lower resistance vessels) is to allow for control of where the blood goes. So, the BP itself is required to make sure that blood does not end-up mal-distributed to the organs.
Fluids first then add on pressors only if the BP remains low after 30 ml/kg?
Surviving Sepsis Guidelines codify
Address the hypovolemia portion based on hypoalb, duration of symptoms, severity of reduced intake – address vasodilation with pressors.
EGDT = Theory is: fluid resuscitation to address hypovolemic component (normalize the mixed venous saturation), then pressors.
Where does 30 cc/kg come from? Average amount given in PROCESS and ARISE trials interrogating EGDT.
Fluids first then add on pressors only if the BP remains low after 30 ml/kg?
Surviving Sepsis Guidelines, Sepsis 3 definition codify
Abdominal Sepsis – greater fluid resuscitation, anecdotally
Keep giving fluids until lactate normalizes?
If it’s possible to support your blood pressure with more fluids if you can?
ONLY 30% of fluids remains in the vessels after 30 minutes. (More if you are hypovolemic)
Cap refill
“The traditional strategy of flogging the patient with fluid for hours before starting pressors is ill-conceived.
Fluid responsiveness assessment, NICOM, etc. Lactate elevated =/= more fluids
Keep giving fluids until lactate normalizes? SCCM recommends, but also ill conceived
If it’s possible to support your blood pressure with more fluids if you can?
https://litfl.com/deresuscitation-and-positive-fluid-balance/
Positive fluid balance is associated with worse morbidity and mortality in multiple studies:
worse overall mortality in critically ill patients (systematic review by Malbrain et al, 2014)
increased mortality in patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) (SOAP study)
prolonged recovery in patients with acute lung injury/ acute respiratory distress syndrome (ALI/ARDS) (FACTT trial); improved mortality in ARDSNET patients if they had negative fluid balance at day 4 (Rosenberg et al, 2009)
worse mortality in septic shock patients (VAST trial)
worse morbidity in colorectal surgery patients
associated with intra-abdominal hypertension (Malbrain et al, 2014)
Argument against lactate being about DO2
Lactate increasing after epinephrine usage is associated with BETTER outcome - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20016405/
Pareto Principle
Alpha1 agonist (vasoconstriction), beta1 agonism (myocardial contractility)
Start at 0.04 mcg/kg/min, titrate up or down to reach MAP 65 mmHg
There is no maximum dose of norepinephrine
-association between digit (and gut) ischemia and high dose vasopressors is fraught - https://www.aliem.com/myth-vasopressors-ischemia/ Unknown
Beware if they are having ectopy, as beta2 activation from epinephrine will worsen this.
Epinephrine 1st is the practice pattern in Europe.
Beware if they are having ectopy, as beta2 activation from epinephrine will worsen this.
Pareto Principle
Digit necrosis – is it known if this is from the vasopressor or from the illness severity?
This is just common practice, and has not been empirically shown to be an optimal resuscitation strategy.
TODO: UPDATE with this meta-analysis: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33039229/, broken down here: https://rebelem.com/are-peripheral-vasopressors-causing-too-many-complications/
Vs central venous catheters: 3SITES study in NEJM https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1500964?downloadfile=showPowerPoint&articleTools=true&doi=10.1056/NEJMoa1500964
3-4% complication rates (infection, symptomatic DVT, or mechaniucal complication)
Censer trial (early pressors trial mentioned earlier), did not have them insert a CVC on each patient as part of the protocol: had no excess I major adverse events compared to fluid group
There are probably some small refinements to this, but they generally haven’t been empirically demonstrated and only apply in the minority of cases.
80/20 rule based approach