© author(s) of these slides including research results from the KOM research network and TU Darmstadt; otherwise it is specified at the respective slide 
24-Oct-14 
Dr.-Ing. Johannes Konert 
Dr.-Ing. Christoph Rensing KOM - Multimedia Communications Lab 
Template Teaching v.3.4 
KnowShare__2_Theories_Challenges_2014.10.24__1.0.pptx 
Theories and Challenges 
Social Learning and Knowledge Sharing Technologies 24 October 2014 
1. Theories and Challenges 
2. Structures and Pattern 
Modeling Context 
4. Context- Awareness 
Search 
Context Detection 
3. Services and Mechanisms 
Peer Tutoring Collabora. Tasks 
Contextual Services 
5. Evaluation 
Foundations and Learning Theories 
Challenge: Resource Selection & Navigation 
Challenge: Coopera- tion & Collaboration 
Challenge: Feedback & Targeting 
Peer Assessment & Feedback 
Learning Analytics 
Learning Path Transparency 
Offline Evaluation 
Hypothesis validation 
Formative and summative 
Resources 
Social Patterns 
Graph Theory Basics 
Scripted Collaboration 
Re- com- men- der 
Human 
Resource 
User / Learner
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
5 
Learning Theories and systems related to Theories 
Motivation 
1. Theories and Challenges 
2. Structures and Pattern 
Modeling Context 
4. Context- Awareness 
Search 
Context Detection 
3. Services and Mechanisms 
Peer Tutoring Collabora. Tasks 
Contextual Services 
5. Evaluation 
Foundations and Learning Theories 
Challenge: Resource Selection & Navigation 
Challenge: Coopera- tion & Collaboration 
Challenge: Feedback & Targeting 
Peer Assessment & Feedback 
Learning Analytics 
Learning Path Transparency 
Offline Evaluation 
Hypothesis validation 
Formative and summative 
Resources 
Social Patterns 
Graph Theory Basics 
Scripted Collaboration 
Re- com- men- der 
Human 
Resource 
User / Learner
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
6 
Learning Theories 
Conceptual frameworks describing how information is absorbed, processed, and retained during learning 
Building of theories mainly driven by educational psychology 
Learning Theories 
Inputs 
Learning 
? 
Outcomes
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
7 
Mainly interested in observable behaviour 
Like in animal experiments 
Behaviour is congenital or influenced by learning 
Mental processes uninteresting -> Black Box Classical Conditioning (Ivan Pavlov: experiment with dogs) Operant Conditioning (B.F. Skinner) Characteristics 
Behaviorism assumes that a learner is essentially passive, responding to environmental stimuli. 
Believes that a learner starts out with a clean slate, and behavior is shaped by positive and negative reinforcement. 
Communication between teacher and learner is unidirectional 
I. Behaviorism – Foundation & Characteristics 
Stimulus 
Behavior 
Image source: MagentaGreen CC BY-SA 3.0
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
8 
Classroom 
Rewards and punishments 
Responsibility for student learning rests squarely with the teacher 
Lecture-based, highly structured 
Technology enhanced Learning 
Programmed instruction (Skinner) 
Small atoms of learning contents sequentially presented 
(Simple) questions to every atom 
If answer correct, next atom 
If answer wrong, repeating atom and question 
Realized in Computer based Trainings / Web based Trainings 
Design based on behaviorism 
Knowledge 
Medium Content 
Learner Learning- Success 
Transfer 
Present- ation 
Image source: own from www.docendo.org
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
9 
Different kind of learning content / knowledge related to different learning processes exist (J.R. Anderson) 
Declarative 
Procedural 
Situative 
Multiple intelligences (H. Gardener) 
Linguistic-verbal 
Logical-mathematical 
Spatial-visual 
Body-kinesthetic 
Musical 
… 
II. Cognitivism – Foundations & Characteristics 
Cognitivism attempts to answer how and why people learn 
What is going in the mind (cognitivism) vs. observable behavior (behaviorism) 
Absorption and processing of information lead to knowledge represented and stored in the brain 
Teaching and learning processes is seen as coded information transfer between teacher and learner Learning content and tasks are didactical prepared 
Stimulus 
Cognitive Processes 
Behavior
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
10 
Characteristics 
Nomination of objectives 
Specification of teaching scenarios 
Determination of operational features used during teaching 
Instruments for assesment of knowledge Classroom 
usage of visual aids 
 material should include demonstration, examples, feedback 
 critical thinking 
Technology enhanced Learning 
Intelligent Tutoring Systems 
E.g. Cognitive Tutor http://www.carnegielearning.com/learning- solutions/software/cognitive-tutor/ 
Design based on Cognitivism 
Knowledge 
Medium Offer 
Learner Learning- Success 
Transfer 
Process 
Image source: http://www.carnegielearning.com/learning-solutions/software/cognitive-tutor/
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
11 
Assumptions 
Reality is not objectively observable and explainable. 
By reflecting on our experiences we construct our own understanding of the world we live in. 
Perception, thinking and knowledge is based on individual constructions. Foundations 
J. Piaget: children learn through organization and schemas – build their own learning by taking part in social activities and exploration 
L. Vygotsky: culture is the prime determinant of individual development Conclusions 
Learner is actively engaged in their learning process (student centered) 
Cooperative learning and socialization are central aspects 
Learning by critical thinking 
Teacher is a guide 
III. Constructivism
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
12 
Classroom 
Group work 
Hands-on experimentation, problem solving, logical reasoning 
Students viewpoints are central 
Teachers behave as facilitators 
… 
Technology enhanced learning 
Computer supported cooperative learning (CSCL) 
Learning using social software 
Community oriented learning 
Self-directed learning 
… Systems 
Virtual Classrooms 
Wikis 
Etherpads 
Weblogs and Microblogging 
Mindmapping 
Social Bookmarking 
Cloud file storage 
Constructivism in practice
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
13 
Example Adobe Connect 
Virtual Classrooms 
Image source: http://opco12.de/16-20-april-2012-einfuhrungswoche/#Online-Event
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
14 
Example Vitero 
Virtual Classrooms 
Image source: vitero.de/de/anwendungsbereiche/e-learning.html
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
15 
Example Vitero 
Virtual Classrooms 
Image source: vitero.de/de/anwendungsbereiche/e-learning.html
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
16 
Use of Wikis 
Active learning mechanisms 
Proven very successful in teaching civil engineering at “Fachgebiet Stahlbau” TU Darmstadt Students tasks in a project 
Select a steel constructed building around Darmstadt 
Create a Wiki-article describing this building 
Practical application of knowledge imparted during lecture 
Inventory of building features on-site 
Peer-reviewing of articles by students 
Image sources: http://www.stahlbau.tu-darmstadt.de
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
17 
Example 
Image source: own from project together with J. Lange & H. Merle (TU Darmstadt)
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
18 
Resource-based self-directed Learning 
Image sources: blogger.com, google.de, youtube.com, wikipedia.de, stackoverflow.com
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
19 
Requirements for resource-based self-directed Learning 
Resource-based learning tasks 
Identify information need 
Plan and reflect on learning process 
Search for relevant web resources 
Annotate, tag and organize resources 
Use resources e.g. to prepare a presentation 
Share and distribute resources and results to others 
Source: RBL Model from Doreen Böhnstedt & Philipp Scholl 
Planning 
and Reflecting 
Searching 
Sharing 
and Distributing 
Utilizing 
Annotating and Organizing 
? 
Task/ 
Information Need
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
20 
Assumption 
The human is a networked individuum. By interaction a network build by humans and artefacts grows. New knowledge is generated in networked structures. Proposed by George Siemens and Stephen Downes 
Knowledge is networked and distributed 
The experience of learning is one of forming new neural (biological), conceptual and external (social) networks 
Occurs in complex, chaotic, shifting spaces 
Increasingly aided by technology Connected to cMOOCs (connectivistic Massive Open Online Courses) 
IV. Connectivism 
Image sources: http://www.tedxedmonton.com/speakers/speaker-georgesiemens.html, http://www.downes.ca/
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
21 
http://opco12.de/aktivitaten/ 
Example for a cMOOC – OPCO12 
Image source: http://opco12.de/aktivitaten/
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
22 
Claudia Bremer: MOOCs: MOOC-Formate und Erfahrungen aus zwei cMOOCs 
Example for a cMOOC – OPCO12 
Image source: www.bremer.cx/vortrag81/Vortrag_Bremer_AGF2013.pdf
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
23 
Claudia Bremer: MOOCs: MOOC-Formate und Erfahrungen aus zwei cMOOCs 
Example for a cMOOC – OPCO12 
Image source: www.bremer.cx/vortrag81/Vortrag_Bremer_AGF2013.pdf
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
24 
History of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) 
2008 
2010 
2011 
2012 
2013 
CCK08 
CCK11 
OPCO11 
OPCO12 
PLENK2010 
LAK11 
MMC13 
leuphana digital 
COER13 
… 
OpenEd Syllabus 
Udacity 
Coursera 
edX 
MIT Open Courseware 
CS221 AI 
openHPI 
OpenCourse World 
cMOOCs 
xMOOCs 
hybride 
iversity 
Kurse / englischsprachig 
Kurse / deutschsprachig 
Anbieter / USA 
Anbieter / Deutschland
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
25 
Other Theories 
Learning Theories Map http://hotel-project.eu/sites/default/files/Learning_Theory_v6_web/Learning%20Theory.html 
Image source: http://hotel-project.eu/sites/default/files/Learning_Theory_v6_web/Learning%20Theory.html
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
26 
Learning theories 
Influence 
educational practices & didactical design 
design of educational systems 
are not a foundation for a set of rules 
focus on different aspects and kinds of learning Different kinds of learning outcomes and knowledge require different kinds of educational practices and systems  didactical design based on taxonomies of teaching aims Anderson, Krathwohl et al. 2001 
Learning Theories 
Remembering 
Understanding 
Applying 
Analysing 
Evaluating 
Creating 
Metacognitive 
Processes 
Concepts 
Facts
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
27 
Characteristics 
•Learning and knowledge sharing by communication in groups or communities 
•Learning and knowledge acquisition based on (often freely available) learning resources 
•Knowledge sharing and knowledge generation using social web applications 
•(Many times) initiated by a current knowledge demand 
•(Most times) missing of a teacher or tutor 
Social Learning and Knowledge Sharing in Open Arrangements 
Image source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIlwGYY0_AA 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIlwGYY0_AA
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
30 
Challenges in Social Learning and Knowledge Sharing 
Placement in the context of the lecture 
1. Theories and Challenges 
2. Structures and Pattern 
Modeling Context 
4. Context- Awareness 
Search 
Context Detection 
3. Services and Mechanisms 
Peer Tutoring Collabora. Tasks 
Contextual Services 
5. Evaluation 
Foundations and Learning Theories 
Challenge: Resource Selection & Navigation 
Challenge: Coopera- tion & Collaboration 
Challenge: Feedback & Targeting 
Peer Assessment & Feedback 
Learning Analytics 
Learning Path Transparency 
Offline Evaluation 
Hypothesis validation 
Formative and summative 
Resources 
Social Patterns 
Graph Theory Basics 
Scripted Collaboration 
Re- com- men- der 
Human 
Resource 
User / Learner
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
31 
How to find resources? 
Sources to be used 
Usage of different sources (not only google) 
Formulation of a query without strong expertise in an area How to evaluate resources? 
Benefit to reach learning goal 
Fit to current situation 
Credibility 
Technical conditions How to navigate through resources? 
Sequence of resources 
1. Challenge Resource Selection & Navigation
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
32 
How to define learning goals? 
for students Taxonomies of teaching aims 
by yourself  SMART result expectations How to motivate to reach learning goals? Self-Regulation How to concentrate on learning goals? 
2. Challenge Targeting 
Image source: http://blog.commlabindia.com/elearning-design/learning-goals
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
33 
Bloom et al. (1956) Anderson, Krathwohl et al. 2001 
Bloom (1976) 
Taxonomy of Learning Goals 
Knowledge 
Comprehension 
Application 
Analysis 
Synthesis 
Evaluation 
Remembering 
Understanding 
Applying 
Analysing 
Evaluating 
Creating 
Dt. Bildungsrat 
Bloom 
Problemlösung/ Beurteilung 
Bewertung 
Einen Sachverhalt anhand eigener Kriterien systematisch bewerten 
Synthese 
Aus erlernten Strukturen ein neuartiges Ganzes entwickeln 
Transfer 
Analyse 
Sachverhalt mit eigenen Kriterien systematisch u. umfassend untersuchen 
Anwendung 
Erlernte Strukturen in ähnlichen Situationen anwenden 
Reorganisation 
Verstehen 
Erlerntes sinngemäß abbilden 
Reproduktion 
Wissen 
Erlerntes in unveränderter Weise erkennen und/oder reproduzieren
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
34 
S 
Specific 
The expectation is specific if it is clearly written so that it is easily understood by the employee. 
M 
Measurable 
The expectation is measurable if it covers at least one measure of a quality metric, quantity, time and/or cost effectiveness. Measurable means not merely meeting a standard but evaluating how well the standard needed to reached. Without a specific measure, the employee is not able to self-monitor how they are doing related to their performance or achieving the work unit’s results. 
A 
Attainable 
The expectation is attainable by the employee if it is appropriate to the employee’s job level. It allows for some stretch so that the employee will neither exceed the expectation too easily nor not be able to reach the successful level. It encourages the employees to push themselves to meet the work unit’s goals. 
R 
Realistic 
The expectation is realistic if it is within reach of the employee to meet the expectation. 
T 
Time bound 
The expectation is time bound if it can be accomplished within the work cycle. 
SMART Result Expectations 
Doran (1981). Management's goals and objectives
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
35 
Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) focuses acquisition of knowledge as an active self-directed process towards efficiency and effectivity of learning. Schmitz (2001) 
Competencies „how to learn individually“ are crucial 
Individual responsibility and self-monitoring  Process Model 
Self-Regulated Learning 
Pre-actional 
Post-actional 
Actional 
goal setting 
planning 
application of strategy 
self- monitoring 
control 
reflection 
goal modification 
modification of strategy
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
36 
Systems of Self-Regulated Learning 
Three „systems“ necessary for being able to learn self-regulatedly Boekaerts (1999) 
Motivational / emotional 
system 
cognitive 
system 
metacognitive 
system 
Overcome difficulties to … 
• … get started 
• … stick to task 
plan / monitor / reflect 
learning process 
Learning task related 
strategies
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
37 
Self-regulated Learning is not easy and has to be trained and supported. 
In e-Learning  Scaffolds 
Scaffolds 
software tools 
support learners to regulate cognitive, metacognitive and motivational processes 
before, during and after learning actions. 
increases quality of learning processes and outcome 
(Scholl et al. 2009) 
Example: 
Scaffolds
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
38 
Definition following Hattie & Timperley (2007): Feedback is conceptualized as information provided by an agent (e.g., teacher, peer, book, parent, self, experience) regarding aspects of one’s performance or understanding. 
3. Challenge Feedback
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
39 
Hattie & Timperley (2007) 
Feedback Modell 
Image sources: Hattie & Timperley (2007)
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
40 
How to get feedback 
about the learning activities towards the learning goal? 
whether learning objectives are achieved? Examples 
Peer Feedback 
Systems Feedback 
Scaffolds 
Assessment 
… Questions 
When? 
Elaboration? 
Qualitative feedback vs. wrong/correct 
… 
Challenge Feedback 
Reflection 
Awareness 
…
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
41 
Group work central in constructivism and other theories Research Area CSCL: Computer supported collaborative/cooperative/collective learning 
synchronous or asynchronous 
same or different location Concepts and Characteristics 
4. Challenge: Cooperation & Collaboration 
Image sources: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uL5mHE3H5wE / Concert Lab Fraunhofer IPSI / Hilliges et al. 2007 
Aspect 
Peer Tutoring 
Cooperative Learning 
Peer Collabo- ration 
Equality 
Low 
High 
High 
Mutuality 
Low 
Varies 
High 
Skill Development 
High 
Varies 
Low 
Problem-solving 
Low 
Varies 
High 
Source: Konert, J. – Interactive Multimedia Learning, Springer 2014
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
42 
How to form a group? 
Size 
Members 
Roles in the group When to start or end group work? 
Integrated in other learning scenarios How to structure, monitor, support group work? 
Level of detailed of task description 
Assignment of subtasks to roles 
Awareness of group processes 
Intervention of teachers/tutors 
When to rearrange the group composition? 
Inidicators for bad performance 
Challenges Cooperation & Collaboration
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
43 
Wrapup 
Behaviourism 
Cognitivism 
Constructivism 
Connectivism 
Image sources: http://jntcarticles.blogspot.de/2012/01/required-competencies-to-solve-global.html http://hotel-project.eu/sites/default/files/Learning_Theory_v6_web/Learning%20Theory.html
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
44 
Task 1 – SMART Goals (1 Point) Task 2 – Connectivism – a learning theory? (1 Point) Task 3 – Your own task related to lecture 2 (2 Points) From all tasks collected during the semester we will choose at least one for the final examination. 
Your solution of the exercise have to be uploaded till Wednesday 9:40 in the following week (see Submission Date above) again using the moodle module. 
The own task and a correct sample solution (see last task in this exercise) enter in the moodle course forum “Students Exercises” as a new question. 
About the Exercise 
S 
Specific 
M 
Measurable 
A 
Attainable 
R 
Realistic 
T 
Time bound
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
45 
Approaches to Modern Web Application Development MVC, ACID, CRUD REST, LAMP <-> MEAN 
Social Media Systems Design Aspects 
Content vs. User 
Relationship Types 
Roles, Levels, Badgets, Achievements as an instrument for Guidance 
Responsibility and Democracy 
Ambient Intimacy 
Graph Theory Basics What have subways, emails and rivers in common? (or users, tags, resources) 
Image sources: http://www.seawaterfoundation.org/siteImages/rivers_art.jpg,, http://vnfa8y5n3zndutm1.zippykid.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/url7.jpg, http://images.all-free- download.com/images/graphiclarge/s_bahn_71263.jpg, http://de.roblox.com/item.aspx?seoname=U-Bahn&id=28172595, http://faculty.kutztown.edu/rieksts/225/graphs/tripartite_files/image002.jpg, 
Next week: Lecture 3 Social Patterns & Graph Theories Basics
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
46 
Thank you for your attention, questions, feedback or hints. 
Endslide 
km-teaching@KOM.tu-da…. .de 
km-teaching@KOM.tu-da…. .de
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
47 
Anderson, L.W. (Ed.), Krathwohl, D.R. (Ed.), Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M.C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Complete edition). New York: Longman. 
Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, pp. 445-457. 
Bloom, B. S.; Engelhart, M. D.; Furst, E. J.; Hill, W. H.; Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company. 
Doran, G. T. (1981). "There's a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management's goals and objectives". Management Review (AMA FORUM) 70 (11): 35–36. 
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77(1), 81-112. 
Schmitz, B. (2001). Self-Monitoring zur Unterstützung des Transfers einer Schulung in Selbstregulation für Studierende: Eine prozessanalytische Untersuchung. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 15, 3/4, pp. 181-197. 
Scholl, P., Benz, B. F., Böhnstedt, D., Rensing, C., Schmitz, B., & Steinmetz, R. (2009). Implementation and Evaluation of a Tool for setting Goals in self-regulated Learning with Web Resources. In Learning in the Synergy of Multiple Disciplines (pp. 521-534). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 
Video on Social Learning: fuse, What is Social Learning? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIlwGYY0_AA 
References
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
48 
Learning Theories 
•Gabi Reinmann: Didatkisches Handeln – Die Beziehung zwischen Lerntheorien und Didaktischem Design, in M. Ebner, S. Schön (Hrsg.) L3T – Lehrbuch für Lernen und Lehren mit neuen Medien, 2013. http://l3t.tugraz.at/index.php/LehrbuchEbner10/article/download/93/88 
•Michael Kerres: Multimediale und Telemediale Lernumgebungen, 2. Auflage, Oldenbourg, 2001. Resource-based Learning & self-regulated learning 
•Scholl, P., Benz, B. F., Böhnstedt, D., Rensing, C., Schmitz, B., & Steinmetz, R. (2009). Implementation and Evaluation of a Tool for setting Goals in self-regulated Learning with Web Resources. In Learning in the Synergy of Multiple Disciplines (pp. 521-534). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 
•Anjorin, M., Rensing, C., Bischoff, K., Bogner, C., Lehmann, L., Reger, A. L., ... & García, R. D. (2011). Crokodil-a platform for collaborative resource-based learning. In Towards Ubiquitous Learning (pp. 29-42). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Connectivism and cMOOCs 
•Video Connectivism talk by George Siemes http://elearnspace.org/media/WhatIsConnectivism/player.html 
•Video OPCO12 talk by Claudia Bremer and Joachim Wedekind https://lecture2go.uni-hamburg.de/konferenzen/-/k/14441 Feedback 
•Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77(1), 81-112. 
•Musch, J. (1999). Die Gestaltung von Feedback in computergestützten Lernumgebungen: Modelle und Befunde. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 13(3), 148-160. Collaborative Learning 
•Konert, J. (2014). Interactive Multimedia Learning, Springer. 
•Haake, J., Schwabe, G., Wessner, M. (2012). CSCL-Kompendium 2.0, Oldenbourg 
Further Readings
KOM – Multimedia Communications Lab 
49 
Sources are indicated at bottom of the slides 
Image Sources

Social Learning and Knowledge Sharing Technologies Lecture Slides Lecture Learning Theories and Challenges

  • 1.
    © author(s) ofthese slides including research results from the KOM research network and TU Darmstadt; otherwise it is specified at the respective slide 24-Oct-14 Dr.-Ing. Johannes Konert Dr.-Ing. Christoph Rensing KOM - Multimedia Communications Lab Template Teaching v.3.4 KnowShare__2_Theories_Challenges_2014.10.24__1.0.pptx Theories and Challenges Social Learning and Knowledge Sharing Technologies 24 October 2014 1. Theories and Challenges 2. Structures and Pattern Modeling Context 4. Context- Awareness Search Context Detection 3. Services and Mechanisms Peer Tutoring Collabora. Tasks Contextual Services 5. Evaluation Foundations and Learning Theories Challenge: Resource Selection & Navigation Challenge: Coopera- tion & Collaboration Challenge: Feedback & Targeting Peer Assessment & Feedback Learning Analytics Learning Path Transparency Offline Evaluation Hypothesis validation Formative and summative Resources Social Patterns Graph Theory Basics Scripted Collaboration Re- com- men- der Human Resource User / Learner
  • 2.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 5 Learning Theories and systems related to Theories Motivation 1. Theories and Challenges 2. Structures and Pattern Modeling Context 4. Context- Awareness Search Context Detection 3. Services and Mechanisms Peer Tutoring Collabora. Tasks Contextual Services 5. Evaluation Foundations and Learning Theories Challenge: Resource Selection & Navigation Challenge: Coopera- tion & Collaboration Challenge: Feedback & Targeting Peer Assessment & Feedback Learning Analytics Learning Path Transparency Offline Evaluation Hypothesis validation Formative and summative Resources Social Patterns Graph Theory Basics Scripted Collaboration Re- com- men- der Human Resource User / Learner
  • 3.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 6 Learning Theories Conceptual frameworks describing how information is absorbed, processed, and retained during learning Building of theories mainly driven by educational psychology Learning Theories Inputs Learning ? Outcomes
  • 4.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 7 Mainly interested in observable behaviour Like in animal experiments Behaviour is congenital or influenced by learning Mental processes uninteresting -> Black Box Classical Conditioning (Ivan Pavlov: experiment with dogs) Operant Conditioning (B.F. Skinner) Characteristics Behaviorism assumes that a learner is essentially passive, responding to environmental stimuli. Believes that a learner starts out with a clean slate, and behavior is shaped by positive and negative reinforcement. Communication between teacher and learner is unidirectional I. Behaviorism – Foundation & Characteristics Stimulus Behavior Image source: MagentaGreen CC BY-SA 3.0
  • 5.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 8 Classroom Rewards and punishments Responsibility for student learning rests squarely with the teacher Lecture-based, highly structured Technology enhanced Learning Programmed instruction (Skinner) Small atoms of learning contents sequentially presented (Simple) questions to every atom If answer correct, next atom If answer wrong, repeating atom and question Realized in Computer based Trainings / Web based Trainings Design based on behaviorism Knowledge Medium Content Learner Learning- Success Transfer Present- ation Image source: own from www.docendo.org
  • 6.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 9 Different kind of learning content / knowledge related to different learning processes exist (J.R. Anderson) Declarative Procedural Situative Multiple intelligences (H. Gardener) Linguistic-verbal Logical-mathematical Spatial-visual Body-kinesthetic Musical … II. Cognitivism – Foundations & Characteristics Cognitivism attempts to answer how and why people learn What is going in the mind (cognitivism) vs. observable behavior (behaviorism) Absorption and processing of information lead to knowledge represented and stored in the brain Teaching and learning processes is seen as coded information transfer between teacher and learner Learning content and tasks are didactical prepared Stimulus Cognitive Processes Behavior
  • 7.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 10 Characteristics Nomination of objectives Specification of teaching scenarios Determination of operational features used during teaching Instruments for assesment of knowledge Classroom usage of visual aids  material should include demonstration, examples, feedback  critical thinking Technology enhanced Learning Intelligent Tutoring Systems E.g. Cognitive Tutor http://www.carnegielearning.com/learning- solutions/software/cognitive-tutor/ Design based on Cognitivism Knowledge Medium Offer Learner Learning- Success Transfer Process Image source: http://www.carnegielearning.com/learning-solutions/software/cognitive-tutor/
  • 8.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 11 Assumptions Reality is not objectively observable and explainable. By reflecting on our experiences we construct our own understanding of the world we live in. Perception, thinking and knowledge is based on individual constructions. Foundations J. Piaget: children learn through organization and schemas – build their own learning by taking part in social activities and exploration L. Vygotsky: culture is the prime determinant of individual development Conclusions Learner is actively engaged in their learning process (student centered) Cooperative learning and socialization are central aspects Learning by critical thinking Teacher is a guide III. Constructivism
  • 9.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 12 Classroom Group work Hands-on experimentation, problem solving, logical reasoning Students viewpoints are central Teachers behave as facilitators … Technology enhanced learning Computer supported cooperative learning (CSCL) Learning using social software Community oriented learning Self-directed learning … Systems Virtual Classrooms Wikis Etherpads Weblogs and Microblogging Mindmapping Social Bookmarking Cloud file storage Constructivism in practice
  • 10.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 13 Example Adobe Connect Virtual Classrooms Image source: http://opco12.de/16-20-april-2012-einfuhrungswoche/#Online-Event
  • 11.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 14 Example Vitero Virtual Classrooms Image source: vitero.de/de/anwendungsbereiche/e-learning.html
  • 12.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 15 Example Vitero Virtual Classrooms Image source: vitero.de/de/anwendungsbereiche/e-learning.html
  • 13.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 16 Use of Wikis Active learning mechanisms Proven very successful in teaching civil engineering at “Fachgebiet Stahlbau” TU Darmstadt Students tasks in a project Select a steel constructed building around Darmstadt Create a Wiki-article describing this building Practical application of knowledge imparted during lecture Inventory of building features on-site Peer-reviewing of articles by students Image sources: http://www.stahlbau.tu-darmstadt.de
  • 14.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 17 Example Image source: own from project together with J. Lange & H. Merle (TU Darmstadt)
  • 15.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 18 Resource-based self-directed Learning Image sources: blogger.com, google.de, youtube.com, wikipedia.de, stackoverflow.com
  • 16.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 19 Requirements for resource-based self-directed Learning Resource-based learning tasks Identify information need Plan and reflect on learning process Search for relevant web resources Annotate, tag and organize resources Use resources e.g. to prepare a presentation Share and distribute resources and results to others Source: RBL Model from Doreen Böhnstedt & Philipp Scholl Planning and Reflecting Searching Sharing and Distributing Utilizing Annotating and Organizing ? Task/ Information Need
  • 17.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 20 Assumption The human is a networked individuum. By interaction a network build by humans and artefacts grows. New knowledge is generated in networked structures. Proposed by George Siemens and Stephen Downes Knowledge is networked and distributed The experience of learning is one of forming new neural (biological), conceptual and external (social) networks Occurs in complex, chaotic, shifting spaces Increasingly aided by technology Connected to cMOOCs (connectivistic Massive Open Online Courses) IV. Connectivism Image sources: http://www.tedxedmonton.com/speakers/speaker-georgesiemens.html, http://www.downes.ca/
  • 18.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 21 http://opco12.de/aktivitaten/ Example for a cMOOC – OPCO12 Image source: http://opco12.de/aktivitaten/
  • 19.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 22 Claudia Bremer: MOOCs: MOOC-Formate und Erfahrungen aus zwei cMOOCs Example for a cMOOC – OPCO12 Image source: www.bremer.cx/vortrag81/Vortrag_Bremer_AGF2013.pdf
  • 20.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 23 Claudia Bremer: MOOCs: MOOC-Formate und Erfahrungen aus zwei cMOOCs Example for a cMOOC – OPCO12 Image source: www.bremer.cx/vortrag81/Vortrag_Bremer_AGF2013.pdf
  • 21.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 24 History of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) 2008 2010 2011 2012 2013 CCK08 CCK11 OPCO11 OPCO12 PLENK2010 LAK11 MMC13 leuphana digital COER13 … OpenEd Syllabus Udacity Coursera edX MIT Open Courseware CS221 AI openHPI OpenCourse World cMOOCs xMOOCs hybride iversity Kurse / englischsprachig Kurse / deutschsprachig Anbieter / USA Anbieter / Deutschland
  • 22.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 25 Other Theories Learning Theories Map http://hotel-project.eu/sites/default/files/Learning_Theory_v6_web/Learning%20Theory.html Image source: http://hotel-project.eu/sites/default/files/Learning_Theory_v6_web/Learning%20Theory.html
  • 23.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 26 Learning theories Influence educational practices & didactical design design of educational systems are not a foundation for a set of rules focus on different aspects and kinds of learning Different kinds of learning outcomes and knowledge require different kinds of educational practices and systems  didactical design based on taxonomies of teaching aims Anderson, Krathwohl et al. 2001 Learning Theories Remembering Understanding Applying Analysing Evaluating Creating Metacognitive Processes Concepts Facts
  • 24.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 27 Characteristics •Learning and knowledge sharing by communication in groups or communities •Learning and knowledge acquisition based on (often freely available) learning resources •Knowledge sharing and knowledge generation using social web applications •(Many times) initiated by a current knowledge demand •(Most times) missing of a teacher or tutor Social Learning and Knowledge Sharing in Open Arrangements Image source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIlwGYY0_AA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIlwGYY0_AA
  • 25.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 30 Challenges in Social Learning and Knowledge Sharing Placement in the context of the lecture 1. Theories and Challenges 2. Structures and Pattern Modeling Context 4. Context- Awareness Search Context Detection 3. Services and Mechanisms Peer Tutoring Collabora. Tasks Contextual Services 5. Evaluation Foundations and Learning Theories Challenge: Resource Selection & Navigation Challenge: Coopera- tion & Collaboration Challenge: Feedback & Targeting Peer Assessment & Feedback Learning Analytics Learning Path Transparency Offline Evaluation Hypothesis validation Formative and summative Resources Social Patterns Graph Theory Basics Scripted Collaboration Re- com- men- der Human Resource User / Learner
  • 26.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 31 How to find resources? Sources to be used Usage of different sources (not only google) Formulation of a query without strong expertise in an area How to evaluate resources? Benefit to reach learning goal Fit to current situation Credibility Technical conditions How to navigate through resources? Sequence of resources 1. Challenge Resource Selection & Navigation
  • 27.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 32 How to define learning goals? for students Taxonomies of teaching aims by yourself  SMART result expectations How to motivate to reach learning goals? Self-Regulation How to concentrate on learning goals? 2. Challenge Targeting Image source: http://blog.commlabindia.com/elearning-design/learning-goals
  • 28.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 33 Bloom et al. (1956) Anderson, Krathwohl et al. 2001 Bloom (1976) Taxonomy of Learning Goals Knowledge Comprehension Application Analysis Synthesis Evaluation Remembering Understanding Applying Analysing Evaluating Creating Dt. Bildungsrat Bloom Problemlösung/ Beurteilung Bewertung Einen Sachverhalt anhand eigener Kriterien systematisch bewerten Synthese Aus erlernten Strukturen ein neuartiges Ganzes entwickeln Transfer Analyse Sachverhalt mit eigenen Kriterien systematisch u. umfassend untersuchen Anwendung Erlernte Strukturen in ähnlichen Situationen anwenden Reorganisation Verstehen Erlerntes sinngemäß abbilden Reproduktion Wissen Erlerntes in unveränderter Weise erkennen und/oder reproduzieren
  • 29.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 34 S Specific The expectation is specific if it is clearly written so that it is easily understood by the employee. M Measurable The expectation is measurable if it covers at least one measure of a quality metric, quantity, time and/or cost effectiveness. Measurable means not merely meeting a standard but evaluating how well the standard needed to reached. Without a specific measure, the employee is not able to self-monitor how they are doing related to their performance or achieving the work unit’s results. A Attainable The expectation is attainable by the employee if it is appropriate to the employee’s job level. It allows for some stretch so that the employee will neither exceed the expectation too easily nor not be able to reach the successful level. It encourages the employees to push themselves to meet the work unit’s goals. R Realistic The expectation is realistic if it is within reach of the employee to meet the expectation. T Time bound The expectation is time bound if it can be accomplished within the work cycle. SMART Result Expectations Doran (1981). Management's goals and objectives
  • 30.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 35 Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) focuses acquisition of knowledge as an active self-directed process towards efficiency and effectivity of learning. Schmitz (2001) Competencies „how to learn individually“ are crucial Individual responsibility and self-monitoring  Process Model Self-Regulated Learning Pre-actional Post-actional Actional goal setting planning application of strategy self- monitoring control reflection goal modification modification of strategy
  • 31.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 36 Systems of Self-Regulated Learning Three „systems“ necessary for being able to learn self-regulatedly Boekaerts (1999) Motivational / emotional system cognitive system metacognitive system Overcome difficulties to … • … get started • … stick to task plan / monitor / reflect learning process Learning task related strategies
  • 32.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 37 Self-regulated Learning is not easy and has to be trained and supported. In e-Learning  Scaffolds Scaffolds software tools support learners to regulate cognitive, metacognitive and motivational processes before, during and after learning actions. increases quality of learning processes and outcome (Scholl et al. 2009) Example: Scaffolds
  • 33.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 38 Definition following Hattie & Timperley (2007): Feedback is conceptualized as information provided by an agent (e.g., teacher, peer, book, parent, self, experience) regarding aspects of one’s performance or understanding. 3. Challenge Feedback
  • 34.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 39 Hattie & Timperley (2007) Feedback Modell Image sources: Hattie & Timperley (2007)
  • 35.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 40 How to get feedback about the learning activities towards the learning goal? whether learning objectives are achieved? Examples Peer Feedback Systems Feedback Scaffolds Assessment … Questions When? Elaboration? Qualitative feedback vs. wrong/correct … Challenge Feedback Reflection Awareness …
  • 36.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 41 Group work central in constructivism and other theories Research Area CSCL: Computer supported collaborative/cooperative/collective learning synchronous or asynchronous same or different location Concepts and Characteristics 4. Challenge: Cooperation & Collaboration Image sources: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uL5mHE3H5wE / Concert Lab Fraunhofer IPSI / Hilliges et al. 2007 Aspect Peer Tutoring Cooperative Learning Peer Collabo- ration Equality Low High High Mutuality Low Varies High Skill Development High Varies Low Problem-solving Low Varies High Source: Konert, J. – Interactive Multimedia Learning, Springer 2014
  • 37.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 42 How to form a group? Size Members Roles in the group When to start or end group work? Integrated in other learning scenarios How to structure, monitor, support group work? Level of detailed of task description Assignment of subtasks to roles Awareness of group processes Intervention of teachers/tutors When to rearrange the group composition? Inidicators for bad performance Challenges Cooperation & Collaboration
  • 38.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 43 Wrapup Behaviourism Cognitivism Constructivism Connectivism Image sources: http://jntcarticles.blogspot.de/2012/01/required-competencies-to-solve-global.html http://hotel-project.eu/sites/default/files/Learning_Theory_v6_web/Learning%20Theory.html
  • 39.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 44 Task 1 – SMART Goals (1 Point) Task 2 – Connectivism – a learning theory? (1 Point) Task 3 – Your own task related to lecture 2 (2 Points) From all tasks collected during the semester we will choose at least one for the final examination. Your solution of the exercise have to be uploaded till Wednesday 9:40 in the following week (see Submission Date above) again using the moodle module. The own task and a correct sample solution (see last task in this exercise) enter in the moodle course forum “Students Exercises” as a new question. About the Exercise S Specific M Measurable A Attainable R Realistic T Time bound
  • 40.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 45 Approaches to Modern Web Application Development MVC, ACID, CRUD REST, LAMP <-> MEAN Social Media Systems Design Aspects Content vs. User Relationship Types Roles, Levels, Badgets, Achievements as an instrument for Guidance Responsibility and Democracy Ambient Intimacy Graph Theory Basics What have subways, emails and rivers in common? (or users, tags, resources) Image sources: http://www.seawaterfoundation.org/siteImages/rivers_art.jpg,, http://vnfa8y5n3zndutm1.zippykid.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/url7.jpg, http://images.all-free- download.com/images/graphiclarge/s_bahn_71263.jpg, http://de.roblox.com/item.aspx?seoname=U-Bahn&id=28172595, http://faculty.kutztown.edu/rieksts/225/graphs/tripartite_files/image002.jpg, Next week: Lecture 3 Social Patterns & Graph Theories Basics
  • 41.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 46 Thank you for your attention, questions, feedback or hints. Endslide km-teaching@KOM.tu-da…. .de km-teaching@KOM.tu-da…. .de
  • 42.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 47 Anderson, L.W. (Ed.), Krathwohl, D.R. (Ed.), Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M.C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Complete edition). New York: Longman. Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, pp. 445-457. Bloom, B. S.; Engelhart, M. D.; Furst, E. J.; Hill, W. H.; Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company. Doran, G. T. (1981). "There's a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management's goals and objectives". Management Review (AMA FORUM) 70 (11): 35–36. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77(1), 81-112. Schmitz, B. (2001). Self-Monitoring zur Unterstützung des Transfers einer Schulung in Selbstregulation für Studierende: Eine prozessanalytische Untersuchung. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 15, 3/4, pp. 181-197. Scholl, P., Benz, B. F., Böhnstedt, D., Rensing, C., Schmitz, B., & Steinmetz, R. (2009). Implementation and Evaluation of a Tool for setting Goals in self-regulated Learning with Web Resources. In Learning in the Synergy of Multiple Disciplines (pp. 521-534). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Video on Social Learning: fuse, What is Social Learning? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIlwGYY0_AA References
  • 43.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 48 Learning Theories •Gabi Reinmann: Didatkisches Handeln – Die Beziehung zwischen Lerntheorien und Didaktischem Design, in M. Ebner, S. Schön (Hrsg.) L3T – Lehrbuch für Lernen und Lehren mit neuen Medien, 2013. http://l3t.tugraz.at/index.php/LehrbuchEbner10/article/download/93/88 •Michael Kerres: Multimediale und Telemediale Lernumgebungen, 2. Auflage, Oldenbourg, 2001. Resource-based Learning & self-regulated learning •Scholl, P., Benz, B. F., Böhnstedt, D., Rensing, C., Schmitz, B., & Steinmetz, R. (2009). Implementation and Evaluation of a Tool for setting Goals in self-regulated Learning with Web Resources. In Learning in the Synergy of Multiple Disciplines (pp. 521-534). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. •Anjorin, M., Rensing, C., Bischoff, K., Bogner, C., Lehmann, L., Reger, A. L., ... & García, R. D. (2011). Crokodil-a platform for collaborative resource-based learning. In Towards Ubiquitous Learning (pp. 29-42). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Connectivism and cMOOCs •Video Connectivism talk by George Siemes http://elearnspace.org/media/WhatIsConnectivism/player.html •Video OPCO12 talk by Claudia Bremer and Joachim Wedekind https://lecture2go.uni-hamburg.de/konferenzen/-/k/14441 Feedback •Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77(1), 81-112. •Musch, J. (1999). Die Gestaltung von Feedback in computergestützten Lernumgebungen: Modelle und Befunde. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 13(3), 148-160. Collaborative Learning •Konert, J. (2014). Interactive Multimedia Learning, Springer. •Haake, J., Schwabe, G., Wessner, M. (2012). CSCL-Kompendium 2.0, Oldenbourg Further Readings
  • 44.
    KOM – MultimediaCommunications Lab 49 Sources are indicated at bottom of the slides Image Sources