SlideShare a Scribd company logo
STRUCTURAL MARVELS
The Leaning Tower of Pisa

Submitted by: Dheeraj Kumar
INTRODUCTION
• One of the “SEVEN wonders of the World.”
• Located in PISA, Italy at the 'Piazza del Duomo' square.
• One of the 3 oldest monuments in the Pisa’s Cathedral Square
• Bell tower for the Cathedral of Pisa.
• Renowned all over the world for its peculiar inclination.
• The tilt began during construction and continued further increasing
gradually.
• The tilt was stabilized in the 20th -21st century.
HISTORY OF THE BUILDING
• The building took almost 200 years to complete with two great interruptions. Starting in
1173 and ending in 1370.
• By 1178, the Third floor was complete. It was observed at this stage that the tower was
leaning on the north side, and construction was on hold because of neighboring wars.
• The tower kept shifting to one side over the years, around 1.2 millimeters from the
vertical every year.
• In 1990 the tilt was about 6 arc seconds per year which is equivalent to a horizontal
movement of about 1.5mm per year
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE TOWER
• Weight = 14,700 metric tones
• Ring shaped diameter = 19.6 m
• Thickness of wall =4.1 m, and
2.7 m for all other levels.
• Inclination = 5 ½ degree’s to
the south.
• 15 half columns at the base.
• 180 columns for base.
• 12 columns for belfry.
History of the Construction.
CONSTRUCTION PRINCIPLES/METHODS
• The tower was built as a hollow masonry cylinder surrounded by 6
colonnades with columns and vaults rising from base cylinder.
• According to a detailed computer analysis, while the average foundation
pressure is 500kpa, the pressure at south edge was about 1000kpa whereas
the pressure at the north edge was nearly zero.
• The ground underlying Pisa tower consisted of 3 formations
• Horizon A: 10m thick soft estuarine deposits of sandy and clayey silts.
• Horizon B: 40m depth of soft sensitive normally consolidated soil.
• Horizon C: dense marine sand extending up to a depth of 60m
Underlying Soil profile.

Cross-section in the plane of maximum inclination, situation in
year 1993.
CAUSES OF LEANING OF THE TOWER
• Lack/limited of Engineering knowledge in the medieval-era.
• Creep in the underlying marine clay.
• The unstable mixture of soil – caused the tower to sink to the south
side.
• Soil at south side compressed faster than the north side – weight of the
tower was the main factor of tilt.
• Tilting was also due to the fluctuations of the water levels.
• This caused the tower to keep shifting, as well as rotate…later
discovered by scientists that the tower’s position shifted in relation to
the ground water level.
Ground water level fluctuation in horizon A

Motion of Tower foundation during steady creep
COUNTER MEASURES(TEMPORARY)
• In 1992, plastic coated steel wires were wrapped around the south side of the second floor to
prevent a type of failure called “Buckling”(occurs when heavily stressed walls burst outwards).
• By the 2nd half of 1993, 600T of lead weights were attached to the north side of the foundation
by attaching a post-tensioned removable concrete ring- cast around the base.
• This caused in reduction of inclination of about 1 minute and reduced the overturning
moment by 10%
• In September 1995 the load was increased up to 900T in order to control accelerating
southwards movement but was unsuccessful.
Lead counterweight on the North Side.
COUNTER MEASURES(PERMANENT)
• It was found that small inclination of ½ degree was not enough to stabilize
the foundation.
• Different methods such as:
• Drainage beneath north side using well
• Consolidation of soil using e-osmosis.
• Loading of north side using ground anchors
None worked
Thus Soil Extraction/Soil Excavation technique was applied.
SOIL EXCAVATION/EXTRACTION TECHNIQUE
• Contractors removed soil from the north side with drilling equipment.
• The tower started to sink on the north side, therefore reducing some of the
stress that was building up on the south side.
• Suspension cables were loosely fitted to the tower so it could pull back the
tower incase it started leaning.
CONTD…
• The soil excavation technique was found to be extremely effective.
• The tower was not straightened and has a stable inclination of 3.99 degrees.

• The stability of the tower has been predicted to last for 300 years.
• The tower has not yet collapsed as the structure is made of lime-stone and is
capable of handling more stress than any other building stone.
A view looking up
Stair Case of 6th floor

Stair case of 7th floor

Stairs at the 8th floor
Plaque in the memory of Galileo Galilei's experiments.
BELLS OF THE TOWER
CONCLUSION
The Leaning Tower of Pisa, one of the seven wonders of the world faced
instability and started inclining due to bad engineering and weak soil profile.
In addition to that the city of Italy has a high ground water level which further
worsened the condition.
Due to instability conditions the building was shut off in 1990 and after taking
necessary countermeasures the building reopened for tourists in 2001.
In 2008, 70 tons of weight were removed as the tower had stopped moving fo
the first time in history.
The building Is predicted to remain stable for 300 years to come.
THANK YOU

More Related Content

What's hot

Sydney harbour bridge
Sydney harbour bridgeSydney harbour bridge
Sydney harbour bridge
Dhruv Seth
 

What's hot (20)

Cn tower.. a detailed study
Cn tower.. a detailed studyCn tower.. a detailed study
Cn tower.. a detailed study
 
Eiffel tower: An Architectural Presentation
Eiffel tower: An Architectural PresentationEiffel tower: An Architectural Presentation
Eiffel tower: An Architectural Presentation
 
Golden gate bridge
Golden gate bridgeGolden gate bridge
Golden gate bridge
 
Taipei 101
Taipei 101Taipei 101
Taipei 101
 
Taipei 101
Taipei 101Taipei 101
Taipei 101
 
Golden gate bridge construction
Golden gate bridge constructionGolden gate bridge construction
Golden gate bridge construction
 
Burj khalifa-mode of construction
Burj khalifa-mode of constructionBurj khalifa-mode of construction
Burj khalifa-mode of construction
 
petronas twin tower
petronas twin towerpetronas twin tower
petronas twin tower
 
Romanesque2
Romanesque2Romanesque2
Romanesque2
 
Group8 empire state building
Group8 empire state buildingGroup8 empire state building
Group8 empire state building
 
case study for leaning tower of pisa ,infinity tower, dam failure
case study for leaning tower of pisa ,infinity tower, dam failurecase study for leaning tower of pisa ,infinity tower, dam failure
case study for leaning tower of pisa ,infinity tower, dam failure
 
the dancing house by Frank. O. Gehry
the dancing house by Frank. O. Gehry the dancing house by Frank. O. Gehry
the dancing house by Frank. O. Gehry
 
The petronas twin towers
The petronas twin towersThe petronas twin towers
The petronas twin towers
 
Notredame
NotredameNotredame
Notredame
 
BURJ AL ARAB
BURJ AL ARABBURJ AL ARAB
BURJ AL ARAB
 
Industrial Revolution (Architectural)
Industrial Revolution (Architectural)Industrial Revolution (Architectural)
Industrial Revolution (Architectural)
 
Case Study: High Rise Buildings
Case Study: High Rise BuildingsCase Study: High Rise Buildings
Case Study: High Rise Buildings
 
Sydney harbour bridge
Sydney harbour bridgeSydney harbour bridge
Sydney harbour bridge
 
Renovations, additions and alterations-Krushna Wanjari
Renovations, additions and alterations-Krushna WanjariRenovations, additions and alterations-Krushna Wanjari
Renovations, additions and alterations-Krushna Wanjari
 
Report on High Rise buildings.
Report  on High Rise buildings.  Report  on High Rise buildings.
Report on High Rise buildings.
 

Viewers also liked (7)

The Origin Of The Wonderful Leaning Tower Of Pisa
The Origin Of The Wonderful Leaning Tower Of PisaThe Origin Of The Wonderful Leaning Tower Of Pisa
The Origin Of The Wonderful Leaning Tower Of Pisa
 
The Leaning Tower Of Pisa
The Leaning Tower Of PisaThe Leaning Tower Of Pisa
The Leaning Tower Of Pisa
 
LEANING TOWER OF PISA, ITALY
LEANING TOWER OF PISA, ITALYLEANING TOWER OF PISA, ITALY
LEANING TOWER OF PISA, ITALY
 
VFT to Pisa
VFT to PisaVFT to Pisa
VFT to Pisa
 
Tower of pisa2
Tower of pisa2Tower of pisa2
Tower of pisa2
 
Beauty of Italy
Beauty of ItalyBeauty of Italy
Beauty of Italy
 
Final booklet
Final bookletFinal booklet
Final booklet
 

Similar to Leaning Tower of Pisa

Similar to Leaning Tower of Pisa (20)

Construction failure of structure due to geological drawbacks pisa tower
Construction failure of structure due to geological drawbacks   pisa towerConstruction failure of structure due to geological drawbacks   pisa tower
Construction failure of structure due to geological drawbacks pisa tower
 
Pisaaaa
PisaaaaPisaaaa
Pisaaaa
 
Pisa
PisaPisa
Pisa
 
Pisa
PisaPisa
Pisa
 
Leaning Tower of Pisa.pptx
Leaning Tower of Pisa.pptxLeaning Tower of Pisa.pptx
Leaning Tower of Pisa.pptx
 
Engineering failures
Engineering failuresEngineering failures
Engineering failures
 
Soil properties and its importance in construction
Soil properties and its importance in constructionSoil properties and its importance in construction
Soil properties and its importance in construction
 
1926 tunneling safety 2015
1926 tunneling safety 20151926 tunneling safety 2015
1926 tunneling safety 2015
 
ROMANISQ
ROMANISQROMANISQ
ROMANISQ
 
Case Study Of Stone Structure [Pyramid Of Giza]
Case Study Of Stone Structure [Pyramid Of Giza]Case Study Of Stone Structure [Pyramid Of Giza]
Case Study Of Stone Structure [Pyramid Of Giza]
 
Turning torso
Turning torsoTurning torso
Turning torso
 
PPT ON BURJ AL ARAB
PPT ON BURJ AL ARABPPT ON BURJ AL ARAB
PPT ON BURJ AL ARAB
 
Dams.ppt
Dams.pptDams.ppt
Dams.ppt
 
Millau viaduct
Millau viaductMillau viaduct
Millau viaduct
 
Well Foundation
Well FoundationWell Foundation
Well Foundation
 
SUSPENSION BRIDGE
SUSPENSION BRIDGESUSPENSION BRIDGE
SUSPENSION BRIDGE
 
Rion antirion bridge
Rion antirion bridgeRion antirion bridge
Rion antirion bridge
 
Cn tower.. a detailed study
Cn tower.. a detailed studyCn tower.. a detailed study
Cn tower.. a detailed study
 
Tacoma narrows bridge
Tacoma narrows bridgeTacoma narrows bridge
Tacoma narrows bridge
 
Tunnels ppt
Tunnels pptTunnels ppt
Tunnels ppt
 

Recently uploaded

National-Learning-Camp 2024 deped....pptx
National-Learning-Camp 2024 deped....pptxNational-Learning-Camp 2024 deped....pptx
National-Learning-Camp 2024 deped....pptx
AlecAnidul
 
Transforming Brand Perception and Boosting Profitability
Transforming Brand Perception and Boosting ProfitabilityTransforming Brand Perception and Boosting Profitability
Transforming Brand Perception and Boosting Profitability
aaryangarg12
 

Recently uploaded (11)

PORTFOLIO FABIANA VILLANI ARCHITECTURE.pdf
PORTFOLIO FABIANA VILLANI ARCHITECTURE.pdfPORTFOLIO FABIANA VILLANI ARCHITECTURE.pdf
PORTFOLIO FABIANA VILLANI ARCHITECTURE.pdf
 
Top 5 Indian Style Modular Kitchen Designs
Top 5 Indian Style Modular Kitchen DesignsTop 5 Indian Style Modular Kitchen Designs
Top 5 Indian Style Modular Kitchen Designs
 
Expert Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Drafting Services
Expert Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Drafting ServicesExpert Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Drafting Services
Expert Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Drafting Services
 
The Evolution of Fashion Trends: History to Fashion
The Evolution of Fashion Trends: History to FashionThe Evolution of Fashion Trends: History to Fashion
The Evolution of Fashion Trends: History to Fashion
 
National-Learning-Camp 2024 deped....pptx
National-Learning-Camp 2024 deped....pptxNational-Learning-Camp 2024 deped....pptx
National-Learning-Camp 2024 deped....pptx
 
The Design Code Google Developer Student Club.pptx
The Design Code Google Developer Student Club.pptxThe Design Code Google Developer Student Club.pptx
The Design Code Google Developer Student Club.pptx
 
CA OFFICE office office office _VIEWS.pdf
CA OFFICE office office office _VIEWS.pdfCA OFFICE office office office _VIEWS.pdf
CA OFFICE office office office _VIEWS.pdf
 
Book Formatting: Quality Control Checks for Designers
Book Formatting: Quality Control Checks for DesignersBook Formatting: Quality Control Checks for Designers
Book Formatting: Quality Control Checks for Designers
 
Art Nouveau Movement Presentation for Art History.
Art Nouveau Movement Presentation for Art History.Art Nouveau Movement Presentation for Art History.
Art Nouveau Movement Presentation for Art History.
 
Common Designing Mistakes and How to avoid them
Common Designing Mistakes and How to avoid themCommon Designing Mistakes and How to avoid them
Common Designing Mistakes and How to avoid them
 
Transforming Brand Perception and Boosting Profitability
Transforming Brand Perception and Boosting ProfitabilityTransforming Brand Perception and Boosting Profitability
Transforming Brand Perception and Boosting Profitability
 

Leaning Tower of Pisa

  • 1. STRUCTURAL MARVELS The Leaning Tower of Pisa Submitted by: Dheeraj Kumar
  • 2. INTRODUCTION • One of the “SEVEN wonders of the World.” • Located in PISA, Italy at the 'Piazza del Duomo' square. • One of the 3 oldest monuments in the Pisa’s Cathedral Square • Bell tower for the Cathedral of Pisa. • Renowned all over the world for its peculiar inclination. • The tilt began during construction and continued further increasing gradually. • The tilt was stabilized in the 20th -21st century.
  • 3. HISTORY OF THE BUILDING • The building took almost 200 years to complete with two great interruptions. Starting in 1173 and ending in 1370. • By 1178, the Third floor was complete. It was observed at this stage that the tower was leaning on the north side, and construction was on hold because of neighboring wars. • The tower kept shifting to one side over the years, around 1.2 millimeters from the vertical every year. • In 1990 the tilt was about 6 arc seconds per year which is equivalent to a horizontal movement of about 1.5mm per year
  • 4.
  • 5. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE TOWER • Weight = 14,700 metric tones • Ring shaped diameter = 19.6 m • Thickness of wall =4.1 m, and 2.7 m for all other levels. • Inclination = 5 ½ degree’s to the south. • 15 half columns at the base. • 180 columns for base. • 12 columns for belfry.
  • 6. History of the Construction.
  • 7. CONSTRUCTION PRINCIPLES/METHODS • The tower was built as a hollow masonry cylinder surrounded by 6 colonnades with columns and vaults rising from base cylinder. • According to a detailed computer analysis, while the average foundation pressure is 500kpa, the pressure at south edge was about 1000kpa whereas the pressure at the north edge was nearly zero. • The ground underlying Pisa tower consisted of 3 formations • Horizon A: 10m thick soft estuarine deposits of sandy and clayey silts. • Horizon B: 40m depth of soft sensitive normally consolidated soil. • Horizon C: dense marine sand extending up to a depth of 60m
  • 8. Underlying Soil profile. Cross-section in the plane of maximum inclination, situation in year 1993.
  • 9. CAUSES OF LEANING OF THE TOWER • Lack/limited of Engineering knowledge in the medieval-era. • Creep in the underlying marine clay. • The unstable mixture of soil – caused the tower to sink to the south side. • Soil at south side compressed faster than the north side – weight of the tower was the main factor of tilt. • Tilting was also due to the fluctuations of the water levels. • This caused the tower to keep shifting, as well as rotate…later discovered by scientists that the tower’s position shifted in relation to the ground water level.
  • 10. Ground water level fluctuation in horizon A Motion of Tower foundation during steady creep
  • 11. COUNTER MEASURES(TEMPORARY) • In 1992, plastic coated steel wires were wrapped around the south side of the second floor to prevent a type of failure called “Buckling”(occurs when heavily stressed walls burst outwards). • By the 2nd half of 1993, 600T of lead weights were attached to the north side of the foundation by attaching a post-tensioned removable concrete ring- cast around the base. • This caused in reduction of inclination of about 1 minute and reduced the overturning moment by 10% • In September 1995 the load was increased up to 900T in order to control accelerating southwards movement but was unsuccessful.
  • 12. Lead counterweight on the North Side.
  • 13. COUNTER MEASURES(PERMANENT) • It was found that small inclination of ½ degree was not enough to stabilize the foundation. • Different methods such as: • Drainage beneath north side using well • Consolidation of soil using e-osmosis. • Loading of north side using ground anchors None worked Thus Soil Extraction/Soil Excavation technique was applied.
  • 14. SOIL EXCAVATION/EXTRACTION TECHNIQUE • Contractors removed soil from the north side with drilling equipment. • The tower started to sink on the north side, therefore reducing some of the stress that was building up on the south side. • Suspension cables were loosely fitted to the tower so it could pull back the tower incase it started leaning.
  • 15. CONTD… • The soil excavation technique was found to be extremely effective. • The tower was not straightened and has a stable inclination of 3.99 degrees. • The stability of the tower has been predicted to last for 300 years. • The tower has not yet collapsed as the structure is made of lime-stone and is capable of handling more stress than any other building stone.
  • 17. Stair Case of 6th floor Stair case of 7th floor Stairs at the 8th floor
  • 18. Plaque in the memory of Galileo Galilei's experiments.
  • 19. BELLS OF THE TOWER
  • 20. CONCLUSION The Leaning Tower of Pisa, one of the seven wonders of the world faced instability and started inclining due to bad engineering and weak soil profile. In addition to that the city of Italy has a high ground water level which further worsened the condition. Due to instability conditions the building was shut off in 1990 and after taking necessary countermeasures the building reopened for tourists in 2001. In 2008, 70 tons of weight were removed as the tower had stopped moving fo the first time in history. The building Is predicted to remain stable for 300 years to come.