1. OOFHEC2016 Conference
Rome, Italy
20 October 2016
Drs. George Ubachs
Managing Director EADTU
āGovernmental and institutional strategies to
support new ways of teaching and learningā
1
2. ā¢ Challenges with regard to excellence in teaching
Large student numbers - low student staff ratios /personalised learning
ā¢ Challenges with regard to education and innovation
Research and innovation - delivering high quality education by involving
students in research
ā¢ Challenges with regard to inclusiveness
According to EU2020 goals education is not exclusive anymore.
Making education accessible for many more students.
Solutions require rethinking and redesigning campus education and the use
of ICT solutions.
Main challenges in Higher
Education
3. ļ± Technology has matured / is widely accepted in
education
ļ± Digital applications is improving the quality of
education
ļ± Digital education serves inclusiveness and teaching
mass
ļ± Digital education connects education and research by
involvement of students
3
Contextual changes in
higher education
4. Where do we want to go? = a vision of the future
Education that is
on-demand
self-paced
location-flexible
relevant to life/career now & in future
global and local
personalised to learning place/style/speed
affordable
high value-added
and in a wide range of subjects!
4
5. Development of a vision
ā¢ Personalized teaching and learning , putting the students with their ambitions and
talents at the centre, with individual learning arrangements. Learning tools and
learning analytics with personalized feedback make this possible.
ā¢ Small scale and intensive education, looking for a balance between education for
qualifications, socialization and personal development. All this together is Bildung.
Smaller scale is made possible by learning communities.
ā¢ Rich learning environments relating to research and professional employment,
involving the student
ā¢ Openness to learners through flexible, inclusive structures and methods that take
higher education to students when and where they need it. Education is not
exclusive. More than 50 pct. Of an age cohort follows a form of higher education
ā¢ networked education and mobility, where students can learn across national,
sectoral and institutional boundaries.
ā¢ Enhancing staff quality in the framework of systemic change
6. The university of tomorrow
Three complementary educational segments are
emerging:
ā¢ Blended and online mainstream education
ā¢ Blended and online continuous education
ā¢ Non-degree education and online open
education and MOOCs
More open, more productive, more efficient
7. Universityās interest
Next to institutional considerations to increase
quality of education, there are two emerging
external drivers:
-Cultural rather than a technological shift
-Increased competition in a global context
For universities ICT is no longer an optional element
for enhancing education, but a must.
9. 9
The āChanging Pedagogical Landscapeā Study
Despite the shift to student-centred learning and developments and
opportunities in technology-enhanced education, the majority of
European HEI has made little progress in adapting course offers
accordingly.
The context for European higher education
The overall objective of the study is to examine to what extent
government strategies and higher education regulatory and
accreditation, funding, quality assurance, assessment and
certification frameworks support or hinder new modes of learning
and, in particular, the increased use of technology in the teaching
and learning process.
The overall purpose of the CPL Study
10. 10
The āChanging Pedagogical Landscapeā
Study
1. To identify the implications for pedagogy in HEI of the most significant practices
and trends in new modes of teaching and learning,
2. To complete an overview of what government-led strategies, policies and
measures exist in a sample of 8 European countries to foster an increased use
of ICT and the key aims that are envisaged (Germany, Spain, France, Lithuania,
The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, United Kingdom).
3. To assess where the main barriers and pinch points exist with a particular
emphasis on accreditation frameworks, funding, quality assurance, assessment
and certification.
4. To formulate recommendations for policy-makers at the level of higher
education systems on how to promote and harness new modes of teaching and
learning to improve quality and relevance and how formal frameworks can
empower and incentivise HEI to exploit their full potential.
Our specific objectives
12. Enablers for innovation
Promoting leadership for institutional change
Learning technology tools, systems and services
Professional development of teachers
Communities of practice
The development of shareable resources
The support of evaluation and research evidence
(Laurillard and Deepwell, 2014)
13.
14. Fields of expertise
1. Curriculum development and course design
2. Knowledge resources
3. Student support
4. Assessment, examinations and certification
5. Institutional support; ICT, media and educational support services
6. Institutional policy development for new modes of teaching and
learning
7. Transnational education
8. Open & flexible education
9. OERs & MOOCs
10. QA in online education
11. Blended education
12. Continuous professional development (CPD)
EADTU Empower first expert meeting
Brussels, Belgium 8 ā 9 December 2014
17. Exchange of expertise
Show-share-generate expertise
1. Join EMPOWER online
2. Join EMPOWER in Brussels EOLLA-leadership academy
3. EMPOWER on-site
4. Meet the experts at OOFHEC
5. Get the EMPOWER Annual advisory report
So,, we are talking about what ICT can do for universsities by offering online education next to on campus education. Not replacing campus education, but improving where possible.
There is however not a fixed model for this. It is not clear what the future university should look like.
We are rather talking about desirables in terms of references likeā¦(see above)
How to develop a vision?
A first attemptā¦
In the vision of university of the future you will certainly have to find these elements
Personalised teaching and learning with the support of learning tools and learning analystics.
Small scale ā¦.and personal development (Bildung) with the support of smaller scale learning communities
Rich learning environments with involvement of students in research.
Each university needs to develop a vision and strategy to 3 complementary segments:
This asks for 3 digital education stratategies and BMs. This in direct relation to the role of the university in society.
-natural environment of the student
-Anticipating on expectations
-enhancing education by adding online components to on campus education.
-global competition.
8
9
10
We need to realize that effects at chal-face level are not easy to achieve. In CPL we identified 7 levels to cover with a win-win to be reached at all levels. All need to be alligned to achieve for example actions announced from Yerevan to the student. A big ask and not free.
Enablers are important in this process.
Key change agents are: institutional leaders and teachers. (1 and 3)
Communities of practice (exchange of good practices. (HE-Academy)
Governments abnd institutions have a shared role.
Government need to fund enablers. So, for innovation and not the regular funding streams only.
CPL recommendations are directed at governmental level.
Institutional change is to be supported by expertise and experiences from univeristies.
The EADTU EMPOWER programme brings this together under 12 fields of expertise.