A Radical Model for Post-Secondary Education
Thomas Zane, Ph.D.
Director of Assessment Quality and Validity
Janet Schnitz, Ed.D., Associate Provost
Assessment
Rider University Ed.D. in Educational Leadership LaunchJamie Mitchell
This Power Point was shared by Dr. Len Goduto at the reception to celebrate the launch of Rider University's Ed.D. in Educational Leadership program. Learn more at www.rider.edu/edd
A Radical Model for Post-Secondary Education
Thomas Zane, Ph.D.
Director of Assessment Quality and Validity
Janet Schnitz, Ed.D., Associate Provost
Assessment
Rider University Ed.D. in Educational Leadership LaunchJamie Mitchell
This Power Point was shared by Dr. Len Goduto at the reception to celebrate the launch of Rider University's Ed.D. in Educational Leadership program. Learn more at www.rider.edu/edd
The presentation showcases a draft of a comprehensive honors research framework recently published in JNCHC and refined during the European Honors Conference in Utrecht. .
Transitioning from School to Work: Preparing Evaluation Students and New Eval...Washington Evaluators
Unlike some professions, there is no single path for making the leap from student to new professional to being an established member of the profession. In large part this is because of the trans-disciplinary nature of evaluation field and the many the broad number of professions and sectors (public, non-profit, private) in which evaluation and social science research skills may be useful. This panel will explore the many approaches used by universities in the Washington, DC area to train graduate and undergraduate students in the field of evaluation, and the transition strategies to help students and new evaluators establish themselves in the evaluation field. The seven distinguished panelists are all associated with Washington Evaluators, and have served in AEA and/or WE leadership positions. Panelists and our Discussant will be asked to address questions such as:
1. In which disciplines/schools at your university would we expect to find courses in evaluation or related to evaluation?
2. What are the components of the evaluation curricula? Do you offer a degree or major field in evaluation?
3. Do you offer hands-on experiences for your students to design and conduct evaluations?
4. Where have your former students worked in the evaluation field, and what kinds of careers have they had?
5. What advice do you have for new evaluators regarding making the shift from school to work in the evaluation field? What types of professional and networking activities would you recommend to further careers in evaluation?
The DC Consortium Student Conference on Evaluation and Policy (SCEP) is a collaboration of universities in the District of Columbia, Northern Virginia and Maryland regions, representing the interests of students aspiring to be evaluators and policy makers. This collaboration aims to provide students with a platform to present their research and engage with evaluation experts in the opportunity-rich region of Washington, D.C., thereby serving as a bridge between students, academia and other evaluation and policy agencies/organizations. In this presentation, students from the Organizing Committee discuss lessons learned from DC SCEP’s inaugural conference. Features of the conference include a keynote address, interdisciplinary panel, and about 30 student presentations. We will highlight lessons learned concerning how the conference served to broker knowledge towards its theme, ‘Advancing Social Justice in Evaluation and Policy Integration’ with Consortium graduate students in the region.
Portfolio of Initiatives: An Institutional Model for Implementing Student Suc...Sukhwant Jhaj
Graduating more students and increasing the quality of their learning are national priorities and Oregon is implementing 40-40-20 to improve student attainment. Due to demographic shifts, institutions must maintain institutional quality and reputation by building capacity to successfully serve an increasing numbers of first-generation and under-represented students. Educational institutions that fail to develop the capacity to serve a diverse student body, with varying ability, will face existential challenges.
Research has shown that institutions can surpass the limits set by institutional resources and students’ backgrounds by engaging students in high quality learning experiences, organized around clearly articulated learning outcomes, supported by high-impact practices, and project redesign using assessment of student learning and program effectiveness.
While there is significant research on factors that have an impact on student success, there are few models that outline how institutions can successfully implement student success initiative. Retention efforts are also distributed across the schools and colleges. This typically results in an institution developing a patchwork of programs, which are not effectively coordinated, where success of one program is negated by the actions of another project on campus, resulting in little or no progress in improving student success.
Case Study: At Portland State University we have implemented a Portfolio-of-Initiatives framework, developed by McKinsey and Company, to develop strategy, and manage implementation. Using a Portfolio-of-Initiatives approach has required us to focus on:
• A disciplined search for a variety of initiatives with the highest possibility of success.
• Rigorous monitoring of projects and sub-projects, with a focus on action.
• Supporting the champions.
• Scaling up successful ideas and projects and winding down unsuccessful projects and changing course when needed.
Portfolio-of Initiatives includes projects that aim to: improve effectiveness of existing academic policies and services; support early identification of students at risk; intentional advising and charting a pathway to degree completion; improve communication; address academic needs of students with a High School GPA below 3.0; address financial concerns; ease transition to college using peer mentoring; improve persistence of Freshmen living in residence halls; make student success data available at unit level; reduce the number of courses with preponderance (20%) of D, W, F grades; manage capacity of programs and course offerings for timely progress to graduation.
Summary: This session will focus on the theory and practice of developing institutional student success initiatives. We will offer Portfolio-of-Initiative implemented at Portland State University as a case study for the participants.
Discussion: Degree in Four Developing a Four-Year Graduation GuaranteeSukhwant Jhaj
This project is in exploratory stage.
If a student participates in this program, maintains eligibility, and cannot graduate in four years because a required class is unavailable, PSU will approve a substitute course, waive the requirement, or pay the tuition.
The presentation showcases a draft of a comprehensive honors research framework recently published in JNCHC and refined during the European Honors Conference in Utrecht. .
Transitioning from School to Work: Preparing Evaluation Students and New Eval...Washington Evaluators
Unlike some professions, there is no single path for making the leap from student to new professional to being an established member of the profession. In large part this is because of the trans-disciplinary nature of evaluation field and the many the broad number of professions and sectors (public, non-profit, private) in which evaluation and social science research skills may be useful. This panel will explore the many approaches used by universities in the Washington, DC area to train graduate and undergraduate students in the field of evaluation, and the transition strategies to help students and new evaluators establish themselves in the evaluation field. The seven distinguished panelists are all associated with Washington Evaluators, and have served in AEA and/or WE leadership positions. Panelists and our Discussant will be asked to address questions such as:
1. In which disciplines/schools at your university would we expect to find courses in evaluation or related to evaluation?
2. What are the components of the evaluation curricula? Do you offer a degree or major field in evaluation?
3. Do you offer hands-on experiences for your students to design and conduct evaluations?
4. Where have your former students worked in the evaluation field, and what kinds of careers have they had?
5. What advice do you have for new evaluators regarding making the shift from school to work in the evaluation field? What types of professional and networking activities would you recommend to further careers in evaluation?
The DC Consortium Student Conference on Evaluation and Policy (SCEP) is a collaboration of universities in the District of Columbia, Northern Virginia and Maryland regions, representing the interests of students aspiring to be evaluators and policy makers. This collaboration aims to provide students with a platform to present their research and engage with evaluation experts in the opportunity-rich region of Washington, D.C., thereby serving as a bridge between students, academia and other evaluation and policy agencies/organizations. In this presentation, students from the Organizing Committee discuss lessons learned from DC SCEP’s inaugural conference. Features of the conference include a keynote address, interdisciplinary panel, and about 30 student presentations. We will highlight lessons learned concerning how the conference served to broker knowledge towards its theme, ‘Advancing Social Justice in Evaluation and Policy Integration’ with Consortium graduate students in the region.
Portfolio of Initiatives: An Institutional Model for Implementing Student Suc...Sukhwant Jhaj
Graduating more students and increasing the quality of their learning are national priorities and Oregon is implementing 40-40-20 to improve student attainment. Due to demographic shifts, institutions must maintain institutional quality and reputation by building capacity to successfully serve an increasing numbers of first-generation and under-represented students. Educational institutions that fail to develop the capacity to serve a diverse student body, with varying ability, will face existential challenges.
Research has shown that institutions can surpass the limits set by institutional resources and students’ backgrounds by engaging students in high quality learning experiences, organized around clearly articulated learning outcomes, supported by high-impact practices, and project redesign using assessment of student learning and program effectiveness.
While there is significant research on factors that have an impact on student success, there are few models that outline how institutions can successfully implement student success initiative. Retention efforts are also distributed across the schools and colleges. This typically results in an institution developing a patchwork of programs, which are not effectively coordinated, where success of one program is negated by the actions of another project on campus, resulting in little or no progress in improving student success.
Case Study: At Portland State University we have implemented a Portfolio-of-Initiatives framework, developed by McKinsey and Company, to develop strategy, and manage implementation. Using a Portfolio-of-Initiatives approach has required us to focus on:
• A disciplined search for a variety of initiatives with the highest possibility of success.
• Rigorous monitoring of projects and sub-projects, with a focus on action.
• Supporting the champions.
• Scaling up successful ideas and projects and winding down unsuccessful projects and changing course when needed.
Portfolio-of Initiatives includes projects that aim to: improve effectiveness of existing academic policies and services; support early identification of students at risk; intentional advising and charting a pathway to degree completion; improve communication; address academic needs of students with a High School GPA below 3.0; address financial concerns; ease transition to college using peer mentoring; improve persistence of Freshmen living in residence halls; make student success data available at unit level; reduce the number of courses with preponderance (20%) of D, W, F grades; manage capacity of programs and course offerings for timely progress to graduation.
Summary: This session will focus on the theory and practice of developing institutional student success initiatives. We will offer Portfolio-of-Initiative implemented at Portland State University as a case study for the participants.
Discussion: Degree in Four Developing a Four-Year Graduation GuaranteeSukhwant Jhaj
This project is in exploratory stage.
If a student participates in this program, maintains eligibility, and cannot graduate in four years because a required class is unavailable, PSU will approve a substitute course, waive the requirement, or pay the tuition.
Exploration of how building and participating in writing circles helps academics, professors and researchers to be increase their scholarly productivity. Composed by Candis Pizzetta for the Jackson State University Center for University Scholars. Composed: September 2016.
Lecturers in their third and sixth years submit portfolios for a multiyear review. In an effort to support these lecturers and help them be ready for submission, CETL will hosts this workshop to inform Lecturers of the requirements of the portfolio, and help them develop the materials that will be needed
This workshop is designed for tenure-track or tenured faculty preparing third-year review or tenure and/or promotion portfolios for review. Guidelines and suggestions for portfolio preparation will be presented and resources to assist faculty will be shared.
This presentation provided an opportunity to learn about the Standards, discover how the teacher librarian can meet these Standards and identify how to collect and collate evidence to support meeting the Standards in three career stages of Proficient, Highly Accomplished and Lead.
Campus-Wide Collaboration: 2016 Bonner New Directors MeetingBonner Foundation
This presentation, part of the Bonner Foundation's 2016 New Directors Meeting, addresses the broader goals and strategies for campus-wide engagement. It provides examples of how the Bonner Program can foster and leverage collaboration with multiple departments and divisions, including Student and Academic Affairs, Career Services, Multicultural Life, Study Abroad, and others.
Education Abroad and Formative Outcomes Assessment: What Professors Think The...CIEE
Students who define specific learning goals before studying abroad are more likely to learn deeply. Formative assessment, based on clearly defined shared learning goals, enhances both buy-in and learning. A brief review of recent research projects will be followed by a guided small-group practicum about defining objectives and choosing appropriate instruments.
This presentation highlights what it takes to get into a top college. This is the English version and covers the following topics -
1. The types of colleges your kids can attend
2. What you need to know about High School
3. The college admissions process
4. Checklist for each year of high school
This presentation was given at Yuba City Gurdwara on October 18th, 2009.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
How to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS ModuleCeline George
Bills have a main role in point of sale procedure. It will help to track sales, handling payments and giving receipts to customers. Bill splitting also has an important role in POS. For example, If some friends come together for dinner and if they want to divide the bill then it is possible by POS bill splitting. This slide will show how to split bills in odoo 17 POS.
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptxEduSkills OECD
Andreas Schleicher presents at the OECD webinar ‘Digital devices in schools: detrimental distraction or secret to success?’ on 27 May 2024. The presentation was based on findings from PISA 2022 results and the webinar helped launch the PISA in Focus ‘Managing screen time: How to protect and equip students against distraction’ https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/managing-screen-time_7c225af4-en and the OECD Education Policy Perspective ‘Students, digital devices and success’ can be found here - https://oe.cd/il/5yV
Ethnobotany and Ethnopharmacology:
Ethnobotany in herbal drug evaluation,
Impact of Ethnobotany in traditional medicine,
New development in herbals,
Bio-prospecting tools for drug discovery,
Role of Ethnopharmacology in drug evaluation,
Reverse Pharmacology.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
1. Jackson State University
September 4, 2014
Presented by:
Division of Academic and Student Affairs * Division of Research and Federal
Relations * Center for University Scholars’ Faculty Engagement and
Advancement Program
2. JSU’s Tenure and Promotion Process
What Makes A Good Tenure and Promotion File?
Definitions of Criteria and Examples
Best Practices
Important Dates
Guiding Documents
Concluding Remarks
3. To introduce faculty to the policies and
procedures associated with successful
completion of the tenure and promotion
process at Jackson State University
4. A strong record of scholarly work as evidenced by
teaching, research, and service
A compelling case for meeting or exceeding unit*
and University criteria
Compliance with University and unit policy and
criteria
A well-organized tenure and promotion portfolio
* CSET and the School of Social Work have supplements in addition to the University’s criteria
5. Candidate’s
Dossier
University
Committee for
Promotion and
Tenure
Provost and
Senior VP for
Academic
Affairs
College Dean
College
Committee
Department
Chairperson
Department
Committee
Department
School
(In Some
Cases)
Candidate
Notification
President
IHL Board
6. Faculty must meet unit and University
standards in the following areas:
◦ Professional Collegiality
◦ Academic Citizenship and University Service
◦ Teaching and Advising Excellence
◦ Research, Scholarly and Creative Activities
◦ Service and Professional Activities
7. Professionalism in conduct and
interactions with colleagues and students
Conducts classes, submits grades promptly, and
maintains posted office hours
Embodies academic honesty and fairly evaluates
student achievement or progress
Participates in faculty development activities
Participates in university ceremonies and programs
8. Actively participates in
departmental, school, college
and/or university committees
Sponsors or participates in
academic-related activities
such as forums, book
reviews, recitals or exhibits
Submits required forms and
documents promptly
9. Robust and current syllabi
Faculty advising
Teaching Evaluations: Student Instructional
Rating System (SIRS)
Creative teaching methods/skills
10. Grants submitted
Grants funded
Manuscripts submitted to refereed publications
Articles published in non-refereed outlets
Papers presented or creative works performed
Refereed presentations
Book(s) published in the discipline
11. Supports the department and school through work on
self-studies, program reviews and other special projects
Actively participates on departmental, school, college or
university committees
Discipline-related service to community organizations
(e.g. event judging, etc.)
Sponsoring student organizations
Presenting academically-oriented sessions for
professional, business and/or community groups
12. The Tenure and Promotion
Portfolio MUST:
Be well-organized
Include well-written statements
describing your accomplishments
regarding the criteria - collegiality,
teaching, research, and service
Provide clear and concise
documentation of accomplishments
(e.g. award letters, syllabi, SIRS data,
etc.)
Adhere to the criteria and format of the
tenure and promotion application
13. Start Early
Your 3rd year review portfolio should be
structured such that it can evolve into your
tenure and promotion portfolio
Don’t Go It Alone
Seek advice from senior faculty and
academic leaders in your department
Demonstrate Your Impact
Explain what makes you outstanding: as a
teacher, grants writer, pioneering
researcher!
Craft Your Narrative
Never let your portfolio be silent on one of
the major components.
14. April 15: Notification of Eligibility for Applying for Tenure
and Promotion
May 1: Written Response from Faculty of Intent to Apply
October 1: Submit to Department
October 15: Submit to the Department Committee
November 1: Submit to the Department Chairperson
November 15: Submit to the College Committee
15. December 1: Submit to the College Dean
January 5: Submit to the Vice President for Academic Affairs
(VPAA)
February 1: VPAA Submits to the University Committee for
Promotion and Tenure**
March 15: Submit to the President
April 15: President Notifies Candidate of Decision
** This committee does not evaluate the portfolio. Its sole purpose is to ensure that University
policies and procedures have been followed.
16. JSU Faculty Handbook (Dec. 2011)
http://www.jsums.edu/hr/files/2012/11/Faculty_Handbook_12_2011.pdf
JSU Promotion and Tenure Packet (with
Guidelines)
http://www.jsums.edu/academicaffairs/files/2012/08/promotion-and-tenure.pdf
JSU Office of Promotion and Tenure
Review Form
http://www.jsums.edu/academicaffairs/files/2012/08/promotion-and-tenure-chart.pdf