Lucknow ๐ Russian Call Girls Lucknow โน7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8...
ย
Item # 1 - 525 Argo
1. CITY OF ALAMO HEIGHTS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Lety Hernandez, Director of Community Development Services
SUBJECT: Case No. 895 F โ 525 Argo Ave
Request of David Varga of Iconic Development, LLC, applicant, representing Stephanie
Hagee, owner, for the significance review of the existing main structure and compatibility
review of the proposed design located at 525 Argo Ave in order to demolish 48% of the
existing street-facing elevation, and 53.6% of the existing main structureโs roof in order
to remodel and add to the rear of the existing single-family residence under Demolition
Review Ordinance No. 1860 (April 12, 2010).
DATE: July 12, 2023
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The property is zoned SF-B (Single-Family District B) and is located on the north side of Argo
Ave, between Greely St and Alamo Heights Blvd. The applicant is seeking to expand the front
porch and add to the rear of the existing main structure.
The proposed project was reviewed by the Board of Adjustment on June 07, 2023. The board
voted unanimously to approve the following variances:
1. A proposed 3ft side yard setback on the west side of the main structure instead of the minimum 6ft
required per Section 3-15(2)
2. A proposed lot coverage of 42.96% instead of the maximum 40% allowed per Section 3-17
3. The proposed main structure exceeds the height looming standard on the west side by 3ft 8-inches
with a proposed top of plate height of 9ft 8-inches instead of the maximum 6ft allowed based on a
3ft side yard setback per Section 3-19(2)(a)
4. A proposed 2ft 6-inch side yard setback to the eave/overhang instead of the minimum 5ft required
per Section 3-82(3)(a) of the Cityโs Zoning Code.
2. POLICY ANALYSIS
Lot Coverage / Floor Area Ratio Existing Proposed
Lot Area 7,500 7,500
Main House 1st
Floor* 1,454 2,205
Main House 2nd
Floor
Main House โ Loft
Garage/Carport โ 1st
Floor* 375
Garage โ 2nd
Floor
Front Porch* 40 150
Side Porch*
Rear Porch* 150
Shed* 315 315
Covered Patio Structures* 161 177
Total Square Footage 2,120 sq ft 3,222 sq ft
Lot Coverage* (max 40%) 2,120 sq ft / 28.27% 3,222 sq ft / 42.96%
FAR (max .50 with bonus) 1,769 sq ft / .236 2,895 sq ft / .386
Bonuses Utilized
+4 โ Preservation of main structure
+2 โ One-story accessory
๏ท Main Structure
o Height โ 15ft 10-inches (max 28ft allowed)
o Siding โ Horizontal Wood Siding (to match existing)
o Roof โ Shingle Roof (to match existing)
๏ท Chapter 5 โ Buildings and Building Regulation, Article IX. โ Demolition
Demolition shall mean any intentional or unintentional act of dismantling, pulling down,
destroying, removing, razing or moving a structure or any structural portion thereof, or
commencing the work of moving or of total or substantial destruction of a structure or portion
thereof. For the purposes of demolition review as described in article IX, demolition is defined
quantitatively as:
(1) Removal or encapsulation of more than twenty-five (25) percent of the framed structure of
exterior walls facing public streets, or a street-facing elevation if the tract of land is
landlocked; or,
(2) Removal or encapsulation of more than fifty (50) percent of the framed structure of all
exterior walls and/or roofs.
Exception: Minor repair and routine maintenance.
Significant structure shall mean any structure or portion thereof that in whole or in part meets one
(1) or more criteria in section 5-134(h), and has been so determined by the city council.
Section 5-134(h): The architectural review board shall consider the following criteria when
determining the significance, as defined in this chapter, of existing structures:
(1) Was the structure designed by a noted architect?
(2) Has the structure been listed as having historic significance by any local, regional,
state or historic agency or society?
3. (3) Does the structure exhibit characteristics of a distinct architectural style?
(4) Does the structure belong to a distinctive set of buildings, such as a single structure
belonging to a row of similar structures?
(5) Is the structure a significant part of the fabric of the community due to its age, unique
architecture, historical significance or physical placement?
Compatibility shall mean harmony with the existing neighborhood, site configurations,
development patterns, and the character of the development envelope found within the adjacent
and immediate block area, as demonstrated in the demolition review application, including roof
pitch, scale, massing, garage and driveway location and setbacks. Adjacent and immediate block
area shall include but not be limited to all properties along:
(1) The specific block where the project is proposed;
(2) The block to each side of the project's block; and
(3) The blocks directly across the street of the three (3) blocks identified above.
Block shall mean a length of street right-of-way along one (1) side of the street from one (1)
intersection to the next adjoining intersection.
The existing main structure is currently non-conforming as it encroaches into the side yard
setback on the west side. The variances related to setback and looming are due to the existing
non-conformity.
The Architectural Review Board considered the request at a Special meeting on June 27, 2023
and voted unanimously to declare the existing main structure as not significant and recommended
approval of the demolition as requested and proposed design as compatible.
The project has completed the plan review process and approval of the permit request is
contingent upon Council approval and payment of any outstanding permit fees.
FISCAL IMPACT
No projected fiscal impact from this project has been calculated.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A โ Web Packet
__________________________
Lety Hernandez
Director
___________________________
Buddy Kuhn
City Manager
4. CITY OF ALAMO HEIGHTS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
6116 BROADWAY
SAN ANTONIO, TX 78209
210-826-0516
Architectural Review Board Meeting
June 20, 2023 โ 5:30 P.M.
Take notice that a regular Architectural Review Board meeting of the City of Alamo Heights will be held
on Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 5:30pm in the City Council Chamber, located at 6116 Broadway St, San
Antonio, Texas, 78209, to consider and act upon any lawful subjects with may come before it.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR TELECONFERENCE: Members of the public may also participate via audio
by dialing 1-346-248-7799 Meeting ID 868 0184 5240. If you would like to speak on a particular item,
when the item is considered, press *9 to โraise your handโ. Citizens will have three (3) minutes to
share their comments. The meeting will be recorded.
The City cannot guarantee participation by phone due to unforeseen technical difficulties or provide
prior notice if they occur; therefore, the City urges your in-person attendance if you require
participation.
Case No. 895 F โ 525 Argo Ave
Request of David Varga of Iconic Development, LLC, applicant, representing Stephanie Hagee, owner,
for the significance review of the existing main structure and compatibility review of the proposed design
located at 525 Argo Ave in order to demolish 48% of the existing street-facing elevation, and 53.6% of the
existing main structureโs roof in order to remodel and add to the rear of the existing single-family
residence under Demolition Review Ordinance No. 1860 (April 12, 2010).
Chapter 5 of Code of Ordinances (Buildings and Building Regulations) requires City Council to consider the
ARBโs recommendation for all demolition/final design review applications. Please check the ARB posted
results on the Cityโs website after the ARB meeting to confirm any future meeting dates.
Plans may be viewed online at http://www.alamoheightstx.gov/departments/planning-and-development-
services/public-notices/ and at the Community Development Services Department located at 6116 Broadway
St. Floorplans will not be available online. You may contact Eron Spencer, Planner, at 210-832-2239 or
espencer@alamoheightstx.gov, Lety Hernandez, Director, at 210-832-2250 or
lhernandez@alamoheightstx.gov, or our office at (210) 826-0516 for additional information regarding this
case.
Attachment A
5. Dear Architectural Review Board,
We are pleased to submit a proposal for the restoration of the cottage at 525 Argo Avenue in
Alamo Heights, Texas. The project involves restoring a cottage-style home, which is currently in
need of much work, and enhancing its curb appeal by adding a front porch that will add
character and charm to the property.
Our proposed roof addition covers an area of 932 square feet while the existing roof spans 1737
square feet. Therefore, our new roof encapsulation represents 53.6% of the existing roof area,
exceeding the 50% limit by 3.6%. As such, our project requires approval from the Architectural
Review Board before moving forward.
The additional roof area is intended to improve the flow of the newly designed home, catering to
modern living standards and meeting relevant codes. Moreover, we believe that this design will
enhance the comfort and livability of the residence's floor plan.
Our project has been meticulously designed to be compatible with the existing neighborhood, as
demonstrated in the project review application. We have taken into account the site
configurations, development patterns, and character of the development envelope in the
adjacent and immediate block area.
The proposed roof pitch, scale, location, and setbacks have all been designed to harmonize
with the existing neighborhood. The restoration of the cottage will not only improve the overall
appearance of the property, but also contribute positively to the aesthetic value of the
surrounding area.
The existing and proposed lot coverage calculations are the following: existing 28% proposed
42.96%
The proposed floor area ratio calculations are the following: existing 28%, proposed 42.96%
The existing and proposed structure heights are the following: existing 22 ยพ ft, proposed 22 ยพ ft
We believe that our proposed project meets the intended purpose of guidelines set forth by the
Architectural Review Board and will be a valuable addition to the community. We appreciate
your attention to this matter and look forward to hearing your decision.
Thank you for considering our proposal.
Sincerely,
Austin and Stephanie Hagee
Attachment A
