Do not include any personal information as all posted material on this site is considered to be part of a public record as defined by section 27 of the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act.
We reserve the right to remove inappropriate comments. Please see Terms of Use for City of Toronto Social Media Sites at http://www.toronto.ca/e-updates/termsofuse.htm.
What is the point of small housing associations.pptx
Island Water Treatment Plant Capacity Increase Study
1. Island Water Treatment Plant
Capacity Increase Study
Municipal Class Environmental
Assessment
2. Background
Island Water Treatment Plant
• One of the City of
Toronto’s four water
treatment plants
• Supplies approximately
20% of the City’s treated
water
• Built in 1977
• Capacity of 410 million
litres per day
• Operates 24/7
• Only accessible by ferry
or marine transportation
• Supplies drinking water to
the City’s residents,
visitors and businesses
• Supplies extremely cold
water to the Deep Lake
Water Cooling project
– Partnership between City
of Toronto and Enwave
District Energy Limited
– Provides air-conditioning
to businesses in the
downtown core
4. Opportunity
• City desires to obtain greater operational
flexibility by increasing the processing capacity
of the Island Water Treatment Plant from 410
mega litres per day (ML/day) to 450 ML/day
– This is desired to sustain peak production flows.
5. Alternate Solutions
1. Maximize the production capacity and
treatment performance of the existing
infrastructure at the Island Water Treatment
Plant
2. Design and construct additional treatment
infrastructure on the Island Water Treatment
Plant site
3. Do nothing
6. Evaluate Alternate Solutions
• Desktop assessment and modelling indicates
that increase in capacity can be achieved
through maximizing production capacity and
treatment performance of existing
infrastructure. No construction is necessary.
• Do nothing alternative is screened out
because it does not realize the opportunity,
but is carried forward to provide context for
evaluation.
7. Least Favourable Neutral Most Favourable
Evaluating Alternatives
Evaluation Criteria
Maximizing production
capacity at existing
plant
Constructing additional
treatment infrastructure
Do nothing
Obj.
Achieve 450 ML/d
Public
Construction impacts
(noise, safety risks, etc.)
Operating impacts (noise,
safety risks, etc.)
Environmental
Construction impacts
Operating impacts (energy
use, etc.)
Cost
Capital
Operating
TOTAL 20 10 18
8. Recommended Solution
• Maximizing the production capacity and
treatment performance of the existing
infrastructure at the Island Water Treatment
Plant up to the desired 450 ML/d
9. Next Steps
• Public consultation:
Next steps:
2014
June July August
23 30 7 14 21 28 4 11 18 25
Review recommended solution with public
Select preferred solution
Notice of completion to agencies and public
30 day review period
Start implementation
Editor's Notes
The Island Water Treatment Plant is one of the City of Toronto’s four water treatment plants. It was built in 1977 and operates 24 hours per day. The plant has a processing capacity of 410 million litres of water per day, supplying approximately 20% of the City’s treated water.
The water produced is used as drinking water for the City’s residents, visitors and businesses. Water is also supplied to the Deep Lake Water Cooling project; a partnership between City of Toronto and Enwave District Energy Limited. The Deep Lake Water Cooling project provides air-conditioning to businesses in the downtown core.
The plant is located on the south side of Toronto Islands, and is only accessible by ferry or marine transportation.
In order to sustain peak production flows, the city desires to obtain greater operational flexibility by increasing the processing capacity of the Island Water Treatment Plant from 410 ML/day to 450 ML/day.
Three alternative solutions are being considered:
Maximize the production capacity and treatment performance of the existing infrastructure at the Island Water Treatment Plant
Design and construct additional treatment infrastructure on the Island Water Treatment Plant site
Do nothing
Feasibility of the three alternative solutions has been studied. A desktop assessment and modelling indicates that the desired increase in capacity can be achieved through maximizing production capacity and treatment performance of the existing infrastructure. This solution would require no construction. The “Do Nothing” alternative is not feasible because it does not realize the opportunity, but is carried forward to provide context for evaluation.
The alternatives were evaluated using the following criteria:
Achieve the objective
Construction impacts on the public
Operating impacts on the public
Construction impacts on the environment
Operating impacts on the environment
Capital costs
Operating costs
Both Maximizing production capacity and constructing additional infrastructure would both achieve the objective of inceasing capacity, but doing nothing would not. Maximizing production capacity is favoured over constructing additional infrastructure according to every other criterion.
The recommended solution is to maximize the production capacity and treatment performance of the existing infrastructure at the Island Water Treatment Plant up to achieve the desired 450 ML/d capacity/
Next steps:
Public comment on the recommended solution: June 19 – July 4
Identify the preferred solution considering comments submitted: July 7 – 18
Finalize the Project File Report and issue the Notice of Completion: July 18
30 day review period: July 21 – August 19
Implement the solution: Beginning end of August