This document compares management practices between India and Japan. It outlines the origins of management in each country, as well as key pillars that guide each approach. The Japanese model emphasizes lifetime employment, seniority-based wages and promotions, and enterprise-based unions. The Indian model focuses on dharma (principles), artha (practical challenges), kama (motivation), and moksha (self-actualization). Additional comparisons note differences in formal vs informal organization structures, individualism vs collectivism, decision-making speeds, and views on risk-taking between the two countries' management approaches.

1. COMPARISION OF
INDIAN
AND
JAPANESE
MANAGEMENT PRACTICES

2. INDIA AND JAPAN

3. WORLD WAR II
ORIGIN OF JAPANESE MANAGEMENT

4. ORIGIN OF INDIAN MANAGEMENT

5. PILLARS OF MANAGEMENT
JAPAN
INDIA
• Life time employment
(sushinkoyo)
• Principle and ethical core
(Dharma)
• Seniority wage and
promotion system
(nenko joretsu )
• Practical challenges (Artha)
• Enterprise based union
(kigyo betsu kumiai )
• Self actualization (Moksha)
• Wordy motivation (Kama)

6. Formal organization
A Separate
Quality Inspector
Informal organization
Worker himself is
the Quality Inspector

7. Individualism
Short term
planning
Top to Bottom
Communication
Collectivism
Long term
planning
Bottom to Top
Communication

8. • Faster decision making
and slower
implementation
• Home and workplace
are two different entity
• High attrition rates
• Slower decision making
and faster
implementation
• Workplace as first
family , home is part of
it
• Less attrition and high
loyalty

9. • Less participation of women in workforce
• Believes in safety and security rather than
taking risk

10. THANK YOU
Kanwaljit kaur Gosal
Reshma R. Lal
Divyant Singh Gahlod
Vicky Gupta
Hashil K. K.