Presentation given, with Leah Emary, to York St John's PostGraduate Research Supervisors' Forum on impact factors, citation searching, altmetrics and more.
The document discusses journal impact factors and provides guidance on their proper use and interpretation. It defines journal impact factors as a metric based on the citations of published articles over a 2 year period. Common pitfalls in misusing journal impact factors are identified, including improperly comparing factors across disciplines, taking journal rankings too literally, and judging individual articles based solely on the journal's factor. The key recommendations are to use impact factors cautiously to identify influential journals but not assume rankings reflect an article's quality and to apply common sense in interpretation.
The impact factor (IF) is a metric that measures the average number of citations received in a given year by articles published in a journal over the previous two years. Impact factors are calculated annually and published in the Journal Citation Reports to indicate the relative significance and influence of journals within their fields. While impact factors help identify influential research and select publication targets, they should not be the sole consideration and have limitations due to variability in disciplines, editorial policies, and self-citations. Alternatives to the IF include the h-index and Eigenfactor, which aim to provide more robust assessments of research influence and output.
It’s important to remember that the impact factor only looks at an average citation and that a journal may have a few highly cited papers that greatly increase its impact factor, while other papers in that same journal may not be cited at all. Therefore, there is no direct correlation between an individual article’s citation frequency or quality and the journal impact factor.
The document discusses journal impact factors and how they are calculated and used. It defines what a journal is and different types of journals. It explains that the impact factor is calculated based on the number of citations in the current year to papers published in the two previous years, divided by the total number of articles published in those two years. The impact factor is used to evaluate the influence of journals, but it only provides an average measure and does not reflect the impact of individual articles. The Journal Citation Reports (JCR) is also discussed as a tool that compiles citation data and journal metrics.
The document defines the impact factor as the average number of times articles from a journal published in the past two years have been cited in the current year's Journal Citation Reports. It explains that journals with high impact factors are cited frequently in other journals' references and citations. It provides instructions for finding the impact factor of a specific journal using the ISI Web of Knowledge database and Journal Citation Reports, which can be sorted by impact factor and other metrics like total citations and immediacy index.
The document provides instructions for finding the Impact Factor of journals using the ISI Journal Citation Report (JCR) database. It notes that users should click on "Journal Citation Report" and then select their subject area and sorting preferences to see a list of journals with the highest impact factors. It cautions that the impact factor should be used wisely and with peer review, as many factors can influence citation rates and a journal's ranking.
The presentation discusses about a Thesis, Research paper, Review Article & Technical Reports: Organization of thesis and reports, formatting issues, citation methods, references, effective oral presentation of research. Quality indices of research publication: impact factor, immediacy factor, H- index and other citation indices. A verbal consent of Prof. Dr. C. B. Bhatt was obtained (at 4.15pm on Dt. 26-11-2016 at Hall A-2, GTU, Chandkheda) to float the presentation online in benefits of the research scholar society.
The document provides information about journal impact factors. It defines impact factor as the number of citations in the current year to items published in a journal in the previous two years, divided by the total number of source items published in the previous two years. It notes that impact factors can only be calculated after a journal has been publishing for at least three years. The document also explains that impact factors measure the frequency of citations but not necessarily the quality of a journal. It provides an example calculation of an impact factor.
The document discusses journal impact factors and provides guidance on their proper use and interpretation. It defines journal impact factors as a metric based on the citations of published articles over a 2 year period. Common pitfalls in misusing journal impact factors are identified, including improperly comparing factors across disciplines, taking journal rankings too literally, and judging individual articles based solely on the journal's factor. The key recommendations are to use impact factors cautiously to identify influential journals but not assume rankings reflect an article's quality and to apply common sense in interpretation.
The impact factor (IF) is a metric that measures the average number of citations received in a given year by articles published in a journal over the previous two years. Impact factors are calculated annually and published in the Journal Citation Reports to indicate the relative significance and influence of journals within their fields. While impact factors help identify influential research and select publication targets, they should not be the sole consideration and have limitations due to variability in disciplines, editorial policies, and self-citations. Alternatives to the IF include the h-index and Eigenfactor, which aim to provide more robust assessments of research influence and output.
It’s important to remember that the impact factor only looks at an average citation and that a journal may have a few highly cited papers that greatly increase its impact factor, while other papers in that same journal may not be cited at all. Therefore, there is no direct correlation between an individual article’s citation frequency or quality and the journal impact factor.
The document discusses journal impact factors and how they are calculated and used. It defines what a journal is and different types of journals. It explains that the impact factor is calculated based on the number of citations in the current year to papers published in the two previous years, divided by the total number of articles published in those two years. The impact factor is used to evaluate the influence of journals, but it only provides an average measure and does not reflect the impact of individual articles. The Journal Citation Reports (JCR) is also discussed as a tool that compiles citation data and journal metrics.
The document defines the impact factor as the average number of times articles from a journal published in the past two years have been cited in the current year's Journal Citation Reports. It explains that journals with high impact factors are cited frequently in other journals' references and citations. It provides instructions for finding the impact factor of a specific journal using the ISI Web of Knowledge database and Journal Citation Reports, which can be sorted by impact factor and other metrics like total citations and immediacy index.
The document provides instructions for finding the Impact Factor of journals using the ISI Journal Citation Report (JCR) database. It notes that users should click on "Journal Citation Report" and then select their subject area and sorting preferences to see a list of journals with the highest impact factors. It cautions that the impact factor should be used wisely and with peer review, as many factors can influence citation rates and a journal's ranking.
The presentation discusses about a Thesis, Research paper, Review Article & Technical Reports: Organization of thesis and reports, formatting issues, citation methods, references, effective oral presentation of research. Quality indices of research publication: impact factor, immediacy factor, H- index and other citation indices. A verbal consent of Prof. Dr. C. B. Bhatt was obtained (at 4.15pm on Dt. 26-11-2016 at Hall A-2, GTU, Chandkheda) to float the presentation online in benefits of the research scholar society.
The document provides information about journal impact factors. It defines impact factor as the number of citations in the current year to items published in a journal in the previous two years, divided by the total number of source items published in the previous two years. It notes that impact factors can only be calculated after a journal has been publishing for at least three years. The document also explains that impact factors measure the frequency of citations but not necessarily the quality of a journal. It provides an example calculation of an impact factor.
This document provides an overview of bibliometrics and research metrics. It discusses what bibliometrics are and how they can be used to analyze the strengths of research, determine investment opportunities, and identify rising researchers. Common metrics like citation counts, h-index, CiteScore, SNIP, and SJR are explained. The importance of using multiple metrics and qualitative input is stressed. Sources of citation data like Scopus and Web of Science are also summarized.
Impact Factor Journals as per JCR, SNIP, SJR, IPP, CiteScoreSaptarshi Ghosh
Journal-level metrics
Metrics have become a fact of life in many - if not all - fields of research and scholarship. In an age of information abundance (often termed ‘information overload’), having a shorthand for the signals for where in the ocean of published literature to focus our limited attention has become increasingly important.
Research metrics are sometimes controversial, especially when in popular usage they become proxies for multidimensional concepts such as research quality or impact. Each metric may offer a different emphasis based on its underlying data source, method of calculation, or context of use. For this reason, Elsevier promotes the responsible use of research metrics encapsulated in two “golden rules”. Those are: always use both qualitative and quantitative input for decisions (i.e. expert opinion alongside metrics), and always use more than one research metric as the quantitative input. This second rule acknowledges that performance cannot be expressed by any single metric, as well as the fact that all metrics have specific strengths and weaknesses. Therefore, using multiple complementary metrics can help to provide a more complete picture and reflect different aspects of research productivity and impact in the final assessment. ( Elsevier)
Journal ranking metrices new perspective in journal performance managementAboul Ella Hassanien
The document discusses various metrics for evaluating journals and research, including impact factor, immediacy index, and the h-index. It provides definitions and explanations of how these metrics are calculated. For example, it explains that impact factor is calculated by dividing the number of citations in the current year by the total number of articles published in the previous two years. It also discusses some limitations and criticisms of solely relying on impact factor for evaluations.
SNEAK PREVIEW Scopus Analyze Results: Overview and use caseMichael Habib
The new Scopus Analyze Results tool provides visualizations of publication trends over time based on search results. It includes charts of document counts by year, journal, author, affiliation, country, document type, and subject area. These visualizations help identify the most relevant journals to publish in, prolific authors, popular topics, and trends in research output related to the search query. Additional details about journals, authors, and more can be accessed through interactive elements on the charts to help inform research and publishing decisions.
Journal impact measures: the Impact FactorTorres Salinas
The seminar on impact measures will first shed light on the best known and most controversial indicator, namely Garfield’s Journal Impact Factor. Its strengths and weaknesses as well as its correct use will be discussed thoroughly. Moreover the corresponding analytical tool, Clarivate Analytics’s Journal Citation Reports will be demonstrated.
Presented at the european summer school for scientometrics ESSS - July 16th, 2019 - Louvain
Research metrics give a balanced, multi-dimensional view for assessing the value of published research. Based on the depth and breadth of its content, Scopus works with researchers, publishers, bibliometricians, librarians, institutional leaders and others in academia, to offer an evolving basket of metrics that complement more qualitative insights. Throughout Scopus, you can access multiple metrics at the journal, article and author levels.
Presentation of findings on Bibliometrics; description, methods with examples, advantages and disadvantages. Methods: Citation counts, Publication counts, H-index and Journal Impact Factor (JIF).
Resources used are shared, please use them.
Quick reference cards for research impact metricsLibrary_Connect
When meeting with students, researchers, deans or department heads, the metrics on these quick reference cards can serve as a jumping off point in conversations about where to publish, adding to researcher profiles, enriching promotion and tenure files, and benchmarking research outputs. The cards were co-developed by librarian Jenny Delasalle and Elsevier's Library Connect program. Learn more and download poster versions as well at: https://libraryconnect.elsevier.com/articles/librarian-quick-reference-cards-research-impact-metrics
DNP Project Journal Selection Review Criteria Emily Johnson
This document provides criteria for selecting a journal to publish in, including scope, editorial boards, peer review process, time to publication, indexing, access model (subscription or open access), and potential publication costs. The scope and "author guidelines" describe what types of manuscripts are accepted. Editorial boards oversee the journal's focus and quality. Peer review provides feedback to improve manuscripts. Indexing ensures the journal is discoverable. Publication costs, if any, should be considered during selection.
SciVal provides metrics and analytics on research performance and impact based on Scopus data. It allows users to view metrics for individual researchers, research groups, institutions, and countries. The document discusses the types of metrics available in SciVal including productivity, citation impact, collaboration, disciplinary focus, and influence metrics. It also covers considerations for using and comparing metrics, which depend on factors like publication type, discipline norms, and entity size. Finally, it provides instructions on defining individual researchers and research groups in SciVal for analysis and benchmarking.
Bibliometrics is the quantitative analysis of research outputs to assess their quality and impact. It complements other metrics like peer review and funding. Bibliometrics can be used to provide evidence of research impact for jobs or funding, identify emerging areas and collaborators, and choose journals for publication. Some common bibliometric measures include citation counts, journal impact factor, SCImago journal rank, and Scopus SNIP, which measure citations and prestige in different ways.
Judging research quality bibliometrics and beyondRoger Watson
This document summarizes and discusses various methods for judging research quality, including bibliometrics and alternative approaches. It discusses bibliometrics such as impact factors and how they are calculated. However, it notes that bibliometrics only measure one dimension of quality and do not reflect the broader societal impacts of research. The document advocates considering additional factors beyond citation counts, such as qualitative evaluations and altmetrics, to more fully capture research quality.
Downloads and Citatations_ Henk Moed_Gali HaleviGali Halevi PhD
This document analyzes usage and citation patterns based on data from Elsevier publications on ScienceDirect. It includes journal-level data on downloads and citations from 2004-2010 for 1,800 journals. It also contains document-level data on downloads and citations for articles published in 62 ScienceDirect journals from 2008-2012. Additional data includes user sessions, institutions, countries, and terms. Charts show trends in downloads over time at the journal, article, disciplinary, and user levels. The conclusion discusses 10 factors that differentiate downloads and citations, such as different user and author populations, obsolescence functions, and sensitivity to manipulation.
The document discusses various quality indices used to evaluate research publications and authors. It defines indices such as the impact factor, immediacy index, Eigenfactor, SCImago Journal Rank, H-index, G-index, and HB-index. It provides details on how each index is calculated and its significance. It also discusses limitations of impact factor and compares different journal quality indices. The document aims to explain these quality metrics to evaluate journals and authors.
Impact factor of Journal as per Journal citation report, SNIP, SJR, IPP, Cite...Omprakash saini saini
The document discusses several metrics for evaluating journals:
- Cite Score measures citations received over a 3-year period divided by number of published items in Scopus.
- Impact Factor from Journal Citation Reports measures average citations over a 2-year period.
- SNIP accounts for differences in citation behavior between fields using a source normalization approach.
- SJR measures influence based on weighted citations from prestigious journals over 3 years.
- Impact per Publication calculates citations in a year divided by number of publications in the prior 3 years.
The document provides information about how Journal Impact Factors are calculated. It defines Journal Impact Factor as the average number of times articles from a journal published in the last two years were cited in the current year. It then explains the formula used to calculate Journal Impact Factors and visualizes the calculation process. The document also addresses common questions about what is included in the numerator and denominator and how title changes, supplements, and self-citations are handled in the calculation.
This document discusses various quality indices used to evaluate research publications and authors. It defines indices such as the impact factor, immediacy index, Eigenfactor, SCImago Journal Rank, H-index, G-index, and HB-index. It provides details on how each index is calculated and its purpose. For example, the impact factor measures the average number of citations to articles in a journal, while the H-index quantifies an individual author's scientific research output based on both their productivity and citation impact. The document also notes some criticisms of these indices and how they can be determined using databases like Web of Science and Scopus.
Journal ranking metrices new perspective in journal performance managementAboul Ella Hassanien
The document discusses various metrics for evaluating journals and research, including impact factor, immediacy index, and the h-index. It provides definitions and explanations of how these metrics are calculated. For example, it explains that impact factor is calculated by dividing the number of citations in the current year by the total number of articles published in the previous two years. It also discusses some limitations and criticisms of solely relying on impact factor for evaluation.
This document provides an overview of bibliometrics and research metrics. It discusses what bibliometrics are and how they can be used to analyze the strengths of research, determine investment opportunities, and identify rising researchers. Common metrics like citation counts, h-index, CiteScore, SNIP, and SJR are explained. The importance of using multiple metrics and qualitative input is stressed. Sources of citation data like Scopus and Web of Science are also summarized.
Impact Factor Journals as per JCR, SNIP, SJR, IPP, CiteScoreSaptarshi Ghosh
Journal-level metrics
Metrics have become a fact of life in many - if not all - fields of research and scholarship. In an age of information abundance (often termed ‘information overload’), having a shorthand for the signals for where in the ocean of published literature to focus our limited attention has become increasingly important.
Research metrics are sometimes controversial, especially when in popular usage they become proxies for multidimensional concepts such as research quality or impact. Each metric may offer a different emphasis based on its underlying data source, method of calculation, or context of use. For this reason, Elsevier promotes the responsible use of research metrics encapsulated in two “golden rules”. Those are: always use both qualitative and quantitative input for decisions (i.e. expert opinion alongside metrics), and always use more than one research metric as the quantitative input. This second rule acknowledges that performance cannot be expressed by any single metric, as well as the fact that all metrics have specific strengths and weaknesses. Therefore, using multiple complementary metrics can help to provide a more complete picture and reflect different aspects of research productivity and impact in the final assessment. ( Elsevier)
Journal ranking metrices new perspective in journal performance managementAboul Ella Hassanien
The document discusses various metrics for evaluating journals and research, including impact factor, immediacy index, and the h-index. It provides definitions and explanations of how these metrics are calculated. For example, it explains that impact factor is calculated by dividing the number of citations in the current year by the total number of articles published in the previous two years. It also discusses some limitations and criticisms of solely relying on impact factor for evaluations.
SNEAK PREVIEW Scopus Analyze Results: Overview and use caseMichael Habib
The new Scopus Analyze Results tool provides visualizations of publication trends over time based on search results. It includes charts of document counts by year, journal, author, affiliation, country, document type, and subject area. These visualizations help identify the most relevant journals to publish in, prolific authors, popular topics, and trends in research output related to the search query. Additional details about journals, authors, and more can be accessed through interactive elements on the charts to help inform research and publishing decisions.
Journal impact measures: the Impact FactorTorres Salinas
The seminar on impact measures will first shed light on the best known and most controversial indicator, namely Garfield’s Journal Impact Factor. Its strengths and weaknesses as well as its correct use will be discussed thoroughly. Moreover the corresponding analytical tool, Clarivate Analytics’s Journal Citation Reports will be demonstrated.
Presented at the european summer school for scientometrics ESSS - July 16th, 2019 - Louvain
Research metrics give a balanced, multi-dimensional view for assessing the value of published research. Based on the depth and breadth of its content, Scopus works with researchers, publishers, bibliometricians, librarians, institutional leaders and others in academia, to offer an evolving basket of metrics that complement more qualitative insights. Throughout Scopus, you can access multiple metrics at the journal, article and author levels.
Presentation of findings on Bibliometrics; description, methods with examples, advantages and disadvantages. Methods: Citation counts, Publication counts, H-index and Journal Impact Factor (JIF).
Resources used are shared, please use them.
Quick reference cards for research impact metricsLibrary_Connect
When meeting with students, researchers, deans or department heads, the metrics on these quick reference cards can serve as a jumping off point in conversations about where to publish, adding to researcher profiles, enriching promotion and tenure files, and benchmarking research outputs. The cards were co-developed by librarian Jenny Delasalle and Elsevier's Library Connect program. Learn more and download poster versions as well at: https://libraryconnect.elsevier.com/articles/librarian-quick-reference-cards-research-impact-metrics
DNP Project Journal Selection Review Criteria Emily Johnson
This document provides criteria for selecting a journal to publish in, including scope, editorial boards, peer review process, time to publication, indexing, access model (subscription or open access), and potential publication costs. The scope and "author guidelines" describe what types of manuscripts are accepted. Editorial boards oversee the journal's focus and quality. Peer review provides feedback to improve manuscripts. Indexing ensures the journal is discoverable. Publication costs, if any, should be considered during selection.
SciVal provides metrics and analytics on research performance and impact based on Scopus data. It allows users to view metrics for individual researchers, research groups, institutions, and countries. The document discusses the types of metrics available in SciVal including productivity, citation impact, collaboration, disciplinary focus, and influence metrics. It also covers considerations for using and comparing metrics, which depend on factors like publication type, discipline norms, and entity size. Finally, it provides instructions on defining individual researchers and research groups in SciVal for analysis and benchmarking.
Bibliometrics is the quantitative analysis of research outputs to assess their quality and impact. It complements other metrics like peer review and funding. Bibliometrics can be used to provide evidence of research impact for jobs or funding, identify emerging areas and collaborators, and choose journals for publication. Some common bibliometric measures include citation counts, journal impact factor, SCImago journal rank, and Scopus SNIP, which measure citations and prestige in different ways.
Judging research quality bibliometrics and beyondRoger Watson
This document summarizes and discusses various methods for judging research quality, including bibliometrics and alternative approaches. It discusses bibliometrics such as impact factors and how they are calculated. However, it notes that bibliometrics only measure one dimension of quality and do not reflect the broader societal impacts of research. The document advocates considering additional factors beyond citation counts, such as qualitative evaluations and altmetrics, to more fully capture research quality.
Downloads and Citatations_ Henk Moed_Gali HaleviGali Halevi PhD
This document analyzes usage and citation patterns based on data from Elsevier publications on ScienceDirect. It includes journal-level data on downloads and citations from 2004-2010 for 1,800 journals. It also contains document-level data on downloads and citations for articles published in 62 ScienceDirect journals from 2008-2012. Additional data includes user sessions, institutions, countries, and terms. Charts show trends in downloads over time at the journal, article, disciplinary, and user levels. The conclusion discusses 10 factors that differentiate downloads and citations, such as different user and author populations, obsolescence functions, and sensitivity to manipulation.
The document discusses various quality indices used to evaluate research publications and authors. It defines indices such as the impact factor, immediacy index, Eigenfactor, SCImago Journal Rank, H-index, G-index, and HB-index. It provides details on how each index is calculated and its significance. It also discusses limitations of impact factor and compares different journal quality indices. The document aims to explain these quality metrics to evaluate journals and authors.
Impact factor of Journal as per Journal citation report, SNIP, SJR, IPP, Cite...Omprakash saini saini
The document discusses several metrics for evaluating journals:
- Cite Score measures citations received over a 3-year period divided by number of published items in Scopus.
- Impact Factor from Journal Citation Reports measures average citations over a 2-year period.
- SNIP accounts for differences in citation behavior between fields using a source normalization approach.
- SJR measures influence based on weighted citations from prestigious journals over 3 years.
- Impact per Publication calculates citations in a year divided by number of publications in the prior 3 years.
The document provides information about how Journal Impact Factors are calculated. It defines Journal Impact Factor as the average number of times articles from a journal published in the last two years were cited in the current year. It then explains the formula used to calculate Journal Impact Factors and visualizes the calculation process. The document also addresses common questions about what is included in the numerator and denominator and how title changes, supplements, and self-citations are handled in the calculation.
This document discusses various quality indices used to evaluate research publications and authors. It defines indices such as the impact factor, immediacy index, Eigenfactor, SCImago Journal Rank, H-index, G-index, and HB-index. It provides details on how each index is calculated and its purpose. For example, the impact factor measures the average number of citations to articles in a journal, while the H-index quantifies an individual author's scientific research output based on both their productivity and citation impact. The document also notes some criticisms of these indices and how they can be determined using databases like Web of Science and Scopus.
Journal ranking metrices new perspective in journal performance managementAboul Ella Hassanien
The document discusses various metrics for evaluating journals and research, including impact factor, immediacy index, and the h-index. It provides definitions and explanations of how these metrics are calculated. For example, it explains that impact factor is calculated by dividing the number of citations in the current year by the total number of articles published in the previous two years. It also discusses some limitations and criticisms of solely relying on impact factor for evaluation.
Metrics: what they are and how to use themDavid Jenkins
This document discusses different metrics used to measure research impact, including bibliometrics, altmetrics, journal impact factors, and h-indexes. It notes that while metrics are used to evaluate research, there are also issues with their use such as gaming the system or inappropriately applying metrics. The document advocates for responsible use of metrics and considers alternatives like the Leiden Manifesto and San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment.
What Faculty Need to Know About Open Access & Increasing Their Publishing Im...Charles Lyons
This document discusses open access publishing and alternative metrics to measure scholarly impact beyond traditional journal impact factors. It notes that open access publishing can provide more readers and citations, leading to greater impact. The document explores metrics like the h-index and eigenfactor that may better capture an individual researcher's impact across disciplines. It finds that open access articles tend to be cited more frequently than non-open access articles, including a 64% citation advantage for social work articles. The document encourages researchers to consider open access options and institutional repositories to broaden the reach of their work.
This document summarizes a virtual workshop on thesis writing and publication organized by Lavender Literacy Club and Cape Comorin Trust in collaboration with other institutions. It discusses research metrics, which are quantitative measures used to assess scholarly research outputs and impacts. Various metrics are explained, including journal metrics like impact factor, author metrics like h-index, and alternative metrics. The importance of research profiles, publishing ethics, and increasing research visibility and impacts are also covered.
The document discusses author level metrics and how they are used to measure the impact of individual authors. It defines author level metrics as citation metrics that measure the bibliometric impact of individual researchers. It also discusses different types of author level metrics, including article-level metrics, journal-level metrics, h-index, i10-index, g-index, and altmetrics. Finally, it discusses tools that can be used to measure author metrics, such as Google Scholar, Web of Science, Scopus, and Publish or Perish.
Research metrics are quantitative analyses used to assess the quality, impact, and influence of scholarly research outputs. Key metrics include journal impact factors, author metrics, article metrics, and altmetrics. Journal impact factors are calculated based on the number of citations a journal's articles receive. Author metrics measure researcher impact and productivity. Article metrics track citations of individual works. Altmetrics provide broader measures of online attention and impact.
The document discusses various metrics for measuring the impact of authors, journals, and articles. It describes the h-index, m-quotient, and g-index for measuring an author's impact based on their scholarly output and citations. Journal Impact Factor and SJR are discussed for comparing journals. Metrics for articles include citations in databases like Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar as well as altmetrics from social media. Broadening research impact involves platforms like Academia.edu, Mendeley, ResearchGate, and Twitter.
This document discusses various metrics used to evaluate academic publications, including indexes, databases, citation metrics, speed metrics, and acceptance rates. An index provides bibliographic information to help locate relevant publications, while a database allows searching full text articles. Citation metrics like impact factor and Cite Score measure how often an article is cited to assess academic impact. Speed and acceptance rate metrics provide additional measures of journal quality and selectivity.
The Rise of Alternative Metrics (Altmetrics) for Research Impact MeasurementNader Ale Ebrahim
Altmetrics are new metrics proposed as alternatives to impact factor for journals as well as individual citation indexes (h-index). Altmetrics uses online activities to measure the impact, buzz and word of mouth for scientific information. It includes new methods to measure the usage at citation level.
This document discusses research metrics and how they are used to measure the impact and influence of scientific research. It defines several types of metrics including journal impact factors, author metrics, article metrics, and altmetrics. It also explains how impact factors are calculated for journals and describes other measures like the h-index, SNIP, and IPP that provide additional ways to evaluate research outputs and impacts. Scopus and the Web of Science are identified as databases used to find citation counts and metrics.
Author metrics are used to track the impact and productivity of researchers through metrics like citations and the h-index. They are important for career advancement and identifying experts in a field. While tools like Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science can provide metrics, ensuring an accurate publication list for an author is challenging. The h-index quantifies both citations and publications, meaning an author with h-index 12 has 12 publications cited at least 12 times each.
This document defines and explains several metrics used to measure the impact and quality of academic journals, including:
1. Impact factor, which measures the average number of citations to recent articles over a 2 year period.
2. 5-year impact factor, eigenfactor, article influence, SJR, and SNIP, which also measure citations but use different calculation methods.
3. Review speed and online publication time, which indicate how quickly journals process submissions and make articles available.
Els lc metrics_reference_cards_v2.0_slides_dec2016Jenny Delasalle
Version 2 includes the new Citescore metric. I worked on the research behind these cards, but am not the copyright owner. Originals provided at https://libraryconnect.elsevier.com/articles/librarian-quick-reference-cards-research-impact-metrics
This document provides guidance on how to measure and showcase the impact of research for purposes such as tenure and promotion applications or annual performance reviews. It discusses quantitative metrics like citation counts, journal impact factors, and alternative metrics. It also addresses qualitative indicators of impact like influencing policy or practice. The document offers tips for strategic publishing, networking, maintaining academic profiles, and collecting and analyzing various types of evidence to demonstrate research impact.
Els lc metrics_reference_cards_v1.0_slides_2016Jenny Delasalle
Each slide covers one of a selection of metrics, with definitions and information about how it might be used. This is just part of a suite of resources from https://libraryconnect.elsevier.com/metrics
Open Access and IR along with Quality Indicators.pptxManiMaran230751
This document discusses open access and institutional repositories. It begins by outlining the traditional scholarly publishing process and some of the motivations for scholars to publish their work. It then defines open access as free online access to scholarly works, along with the ability to legally share and reuse those works. The document describes the two main types of open access - green open access through institutional repositories, and gold open access through fully open access journals. It also discusses various publication metrics used to measure journal quality, individual article and researcher quality, such as the journal impact factor, h-index, and g-index. Overall, the document provides an overview of open access models and debates around common bibliometric indicators.
This document discusses a research project exploring communities of practice around information literacy among faculty at York St. John University. The research aims to understand differing conceptions of information literacy, establish if critical approaches are already part of teaching practices, examine how faculty experience and evaluate information literacy, and create a platform for information literacy dialogue. It reviews relevant literature on communities of practice and social learning approaches. Initial pilot interviews provided evidence that faculty have information literacy concerns and values embedded in their teaching, with one faculty more aligned with emerging critical approaches and one with traditional skills models.
The document summarizes a pilot module on academic integrity for new students at Newcastle University. The module was requested by an academic integrity working group to ensure all students understood the basics of academic integrity. It was piloted with the BHSc(Hons) Physiotherapy program and influenced by work done at Bradford University. The document discusses the module content, the pilot implementation, and next steps, and provides contact information for the authors.
This document discusses evaluating information sources. It asks the user to identify the type of source, where it can be searched, what it was used for, why it was useful for that purpose, and whether there were any ways in which it was not suitable. It then asks the user to compare three sources by identifying similarities and noting the main differences between the sources.
Annotated bibliography resource list (Yr 2 BA(Hons) Education Studies)Clare McCluskey Dean
Resource list used in class for Yr 2 Education Studies module. Students given one to analyse with help of worksheet, then compare with others to put into context of wider debate.
A presentation for PhD researchers, covering social media, issues around publishing in journals and the importance of checking copyright restrictions. Please look at the notes section for content associated with the images.
This document provides guidance on creating an annotated bibliography, including learning outcomes around understanding different information sources and evaluation skills. It discusses key questions to consider when searching for sources, such as what is being searched for, where and how to find it, who wrote the sources and their intended audience. The document instructs groups to identify information sources used previously, evaluate their attributes using a checklist, and look at an example source on assessment for learning to evaluate using the checklist.
This document provides hints and tips for referencing different types of resources, including checking the original web address, publication date, authors, and other details to properly cite the work. It highlights where to find certain publications like Ofsted reports and Acts of Parliament. Examples are given of PDFs found online as well as referencing guides available in Moodle and from the ILS website. Contact information is included for getting additional referencing advice.
This document provides tips for searching for information including using synonyms for search terms to broaden the scope, getting feedback to assess search results, and using truncation with an asterisk to search for word variations and related terms.
This document provides an overview of different types of sources for conducting research, including textbooks for broad overviews of topics or theories, peer-reviewed journal articles for in-depth research, professional literature for opinion pieces and case studies, conference papers for research in progress, and sources like legislation, charities, and government departments for other relevant information.
The document outlines the seven pillars of information skills and evaluation process. It discusses each pillar - identify, scope, plan, gather, evaluate, manage, and present - and what skills are needed to understand and be able to apply each pillar when searching for information on a topic. The overall aims are to understand the information searching process, learn how to search for evidence on a specific topic, and be able to access the full text of information found.
Creating, developing and documenting information literacy partnershipsClare McCluskey Dean
The document discusses creating and documenting information literacy partnerships. It outlines the idea of communities of practice as proposed by theorist Wenger. While some accounts focus on embedding information skills in curriculum, the document advocates investigating one's own practice through action research to better understand how to facilitate partnerships. The author describes interviewing faculty members and recording research meetings to examine their role. Participants are encouraged to consider how to measure and disseminate the effects of building partnerships.
This document discusses creating information literacy partnerships in higher education. It describes how Clare McCluskey, an academic support librarian at York St John University, conducted action research to promote collaboration between librarians and faculty. Through one-on-one and group interventions, she was able to change perceptions of librarians' roles, gain ideas for future partnerships, and identify potential research projects involving both librarians and faculty. The document emphasizes the importance of open collaboration between librarians and other university stakeholders.
The document discusses an action research project that evaluated academics' views of an academic librarian's role and investigated ways to promote partnerships between librarians and faculty. Semi-structured interviews found that academics viewed the librarian's role as either reactive, supportive, or an equal partner. Follow-up one-on-one and group sessions with academics led to new plans for integrating information literacy instruction into courses. While the sample was too small to generalize, questionnaires indicated the sessions positively changed academics' views of the librarian's role and generated new ideas about how the library could support their courses.
Paper presentation delivered at European Association for Learning and Instruction's Higher Education SIG conference, 'Future visions for learning and teaching', Kirkkonummi, Finland, 15th June 2010.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
How to Fix the Import Error in the Odoo 17Celine George
An import error occurs when a program fails to import a module or library, disrupting its execution. In languages like Python, this issue arises when the specified module cannot be found or accessed, hindering the program's functionality. Resolving import errors is crucial for maintaining smooth software operation and uninterrupted development processes.
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docxadhitya5119
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
How to Add Chatter in the odoo 17 ERP ModuleCeline George
In Odoo, the chatter is like a chat tool that helps you work together on records. You can leave notes and track things, making it easier to talk with your team and partners. Inside chatter, all communication history, activity, and changes will be displayed.
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...PECB
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
3. Journal Impact Factor
2008 impact factor = A/B
A = the number of times that all items published in that journal in 2006
and 2007 were cited by indexed publications during 2008.
B = the total number of "citable items" published by that journal in 2006
and 2007. ("Citable items" for this calculation are usually articles,
reviews, proceedings, or notes; not editorials or letters to the editor).
(Wikipedia Contributors, 2015)
5. Hirsch Index
“For example, an h-index of 20
means there are 20 items that have
20 citations or more. This metric is
useful because it discounts the
disproportionate weight of highly
cited papers or papers that have not
yet been cited.”
(Thompson Reuters Web of Science)
(Hirsch, 2005)
7. The
complementary
way
Article-centric
(more individual)
Dig deeper
O’Connell Street News by Herr Sharif,
https://flic.kr/p/js4ctD used under Creative
Commons CC BY-NC-SA 2.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-
sa/2.0/legalcode
social media by Sean MacEntee, https://flic.kr/p/8WnyVB used under Creative
Commons CC BY 2.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/legalcode
The Houses of Parliament and Westminster Bridge by Rob
Stokes, https://flic.kr/p/3cG4q used under Creative Commons
CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-
nc-nd/2.0/legalcode
8. Altmetrics
Badge for BMJ 2015;350:h68, retrieved 21 Jan 2015.
Visit www.altmetric.com for the most up to date data.
9. • What else is on offer?
– Sessions…
– http://ysjilsresearch.blogspot.co.uk/
10. Resources and Bibliography
• Hirsch J.E. (2005) An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102 (46), pp.16569 - 16572.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1283832/
• Wikipedia contributors (2015) Impact Factor. Available from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impact_factor [Accessed 21/01/2015].
• Altmetric, http://www.altmetric.com/
• Impact Factor Search, http://www.impactfactorsearch.com/
• Web of Science, http://apps.webofknowledge.com.ezproxy.yorksj.ac.uk/
• Google Scholar Metrics, http://scholar.google.co.uk/intl/en/scholar/metrics.html
• Scopus, http://www.elsevier.com/online-tools/scopus
• ILS Researcher Support Blog, http://ysjilsresearch.blogspot.co.uk/
• ResearcherID & ORCID
http://ysjilsresearch.blogspot.co.uk/2014/07/orcid-id-for-researchers.html
Editor's Notes
Open: Impact Factor search, Web of Science, Google Scholar http://scholar.google.co.uk/intl/en/scholar/metrics.html, Web of Science, research blog
Why are we having this session?
Demonstrate tools that will help measure (however imperfectly) ‘research impact’
Research impact in the sense of scholarly attention within a field as well as the broader influence and reach
Outline for you/your supervisees the support sessions we will be offering this semester
When will this be useful?
Helps you decide which outputs to use for REF
Evidence of impact for CVs
Helps you choose where to publish
This will work in concert with a push towards open access and our use of the institutional repository
Journal impact factor – is a proxy for understanding how important a journal is for a discipline. The numbers do not compare across disciplines. It’s imperfect but it is used, so that’s why we need to understand it. Thompson Reuters keep the what and why of the indexing proprietary. Done by Thompson Reuters with Web of Science Journal Citation Reports (JCR) which we’ll be looking at in a moment.
Scopus and Web of Science allow you to look it up for all publications BUT we don’t have access. Fortunately, most journals allow you to look it up on their website.
Also known as H-index. Demonstrating it for individual researchers today, you can also have this for publications
Web of Science. Search for Akhurst, J or Bannigan, Katrina to demonstrate how to generate a citation report! Warning, for ambiguous names, this is proof that you need a ResearcherID, ORCID. You can link your publications in Web of Science to your ID, also in the repository. Show the Google Scholar Metrics section briefly.
Clare - Altmetrics – the complementary way
Divorces the article a bit from the journal, as compared with traditional metrics
A good measurement for non-standard research outputs
Social media, blogs, scholarly bookmarking, social referencing management such as Mendeley, policy documents from NGO’s, charities, gov documents
Altmetrics examples
McCluskey – supporting research by being a researcher (cited in Scholar vs altmetric Twitter and Mendeley activity)
Gorard – Who is eligible for free school meals (BERJ)
Recent – BMJ – Impact of a behavioural sleep intervention on symptoms…
Other sessions we’ll be hosting this semester:
Open access
Introducing RaY
Keeping track of your reading
Publishing your research with social media
Discover Discover