This document discusses the Instructional Learning Cycle (ILC), which is a repeatable process for planning and improving instruction. The ILC involves setting learning targets, planning instructional strategies, implementing lessons, analyzing student performance data, and making adjustments to improve effectiveness. Completing this course will make users familiar with the ILC phases and able to implement them in a collaborative team to continuously improve instruction aligned to standards and better meet student needs.
Summary of key messages from the HMIE Aspect Report on Computing provision in Scotland's Colleges 2009
Presented to Heads of Computing Conference, Glasgow 4th Dec 2009
Summary of key messages from the HMIE Aspect Report on Computing provision in Scotland's Colleges 2009
Presented to Heads of Computing Conference, Glasgow 4th Dec 2009
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Normal Labour/ Stages of Labour/ Mechanism of LabourWasim Ak
Normal labor is also termed spontaneous labor, defined as the natural physiological process through which the fetus, placenta, and membranes are expelled from the uterus through the birth canal at term (37 to 42 weeks
Normal Labour/ Stages of Labour/ Mechanism of Labour
ILC_Overview_Presentation_2014.pptx
1.
2. Course Objectives
Upon completion of this course
you will:
Be familiar with the phases of
the Instructional Learning Cycle.
Be able to successfully
implement the phases of the
Instructional Learning Cycle
within a team in your building.
8. Effective Instruction and the Instructional Learning Cycle
How do you align the
components?
How do you know when
what you’ve planned is
working and when you
should make changes?
Is there a repeatable
process that you can use to
help plan instruction?
10. Effective Instruction and the Instructional Learning Cycle
ILC is NOT . . . ILC is . . .
A one time event
A document or
report
Ensuring the
perfect lesson or
unit
Ongoing, iterative
process
Based on theory
of regular
dialogue around
implementation
and impact
13. Why the ILC?
Provides a structure for
using data to inform
instruction
Systematizes monitoring
of impact of instruction
Identifies which students
are on track and which
aren’t
Uses PLC model for
ongoing teacher PD
Makes instructional
practices visible and
transparent
15. The ILC in MI Excel Schools
Requirement #7
Promote the continuous
use of student data
(such as formative,
interim, and summative
assessment data and
student work) to inform
and differentiate
instruction to meet
academic needs of
individual students.
16. The ILC in MI Excel Schools
Gold Standard for Implementation
Collaborative team meetings
Identification of learning targets, state standards and common
assessments
Identification and alignment of the instructional strategy with
the instructional plan
Implementation of a common instructional plan
Collection and analysis of student impact data
Collection and analysis of implementation data
Reflection and next steps
Welcome to the Instructional Learning Cycle course!
After successful completion of this course, you will:
Be familiar with the phases of the Instructional Learning Cycle.
Be able to successfully implement the phases of the Instructional Learning Cycle within a team in your building.
This presentation will provide an overview of the Instructional Learning Cycle (ILC) and the benefits of using it. You will also learn how the Instructional Learning Cycle helps Priority Schools to meet Requirement #7 for Reform and Redesign Plans.
Although there are many aspects to a successful school experience for students, effective instruction is an essential part of this experience. When you think of effective instruction, many things may come to mind—teacher is prepared, students perform well on tests and are proficient in standards, teacher uses examples and good explanations, students appear to understand the content and participate in the lesson, homework practice matched the lesson, and so on. All of these are correct, but it’s also a lot to remember especially when the list could go on and on. So let’s look at a more concise definition of effective instruction that will help guide your instructional planning.
You may have noticed that each of the ideas above relate to either learning targets, instructional strategies or assessment. These are the components of effective instruction. One of the key practices in effective instruction is alignment of these three components. A learning target is a statement of “what” the student will be learning. It may be the learning of a fact, a concept, a procedure or a skill. One standard often consists of several learning targets, and it is important to address each of the learning targets in order for students to successfully achieve the standard. Note that for many learning targets there may be a wide range of content that can be used to teach a standard as long as it supports the three components of effective instruction. For example, in English Language Arts, a standard or learning target will not specify the piece of literature that needs to be read to study a specific genre. The teacher can use literature of their choosing. Or if you are teaching potential and kinetic energy in science, there are many different ways to demonstrate this, e.g., a slinky, a wind-up car, etc.
Have you ever wondered why after you taught students all of the definitions and concepts related to a specific topic that they performed miserably when on a test you asked them to apply the definitions and concepts to real-life situations? It most likely was due in part to “applying” being a different level of thinking than recalling definitions or understanding concepts. In this example, the assessment and the learning targets were not aligned.
Look at the Venn diagram and notice that there are several ways that two of the three components can overlap, but the ideal place to be is where X marks the spot, in other words where all three components are aligned. Take a moment to consider what might happen if only instructional strategies and learning targets are aligned? Instructional strategies and assessment? Assessment and learning strategies? Later in this course, we’ll go into more detail on each of the components.
How do you align the components? How do you know when what you’ve planned is working and when you should make changes? Is there a repeatable process that you can use to help plan effective instruction?
One answer to all of these questions is the Instructional Learning Cycle, also known as the ILC!
So, what is the ILC? Before answering that question, let’s look at what the ILC is NOT. The ILC is NOT a one-time event, nor is it a document or report that you submit periodically. Let’s also be clear that going through all of the phases in the ILC does not ensure that you automatically have the perfect lesson or unit or that all of your students are going to be proficient in three to five weeks! The ILC IS an ongoing iterative process for implementation and continuous improvement of effective instruction. The ILC is based on the theory that if teacher teams engage in regular dialogues around the implementation and impact of instructional strategies on student learning, then the quality and scope of classroom instruction will improve and student learning will increase.
Now let’s look at the ILC a little more closely. From the ILC graphic, you can see that it is a cyclical process consisting of three phases: Pre-Planning, Instructional Planning and Follow-Up. Each of these phases consists of at least one collaborative meeting held by content area or grade level teacher teams. The collaborative meetings provide an opportunity for teachers to determine a common focus for the ILC and to reflect on the quality of instruction and the evidence of student learning. These meetings also allow teacher teams to analyze their combined implementation and student impact data to build a sense of collective responsibility for the learning of all students. It is important to keep in mind that the goal of the ILC is increased student achievement!
In each phase, following the collaborative meetings there are actions that the teachers take in their individual classrooms. Examples of these actions include implementing agreed upon instructional strategies and gathering student data through the use of common formative assessments. Each teacher also collects data on their implementation of the instructional strategies. All data collected in the individual classrooms is then combined and analyzed in the collaborative meetings with the results of the analysis used to inform the next phase of the cycle.
The remainder of this course will provide detailed information and resources for each of the three phases.
Why the ILC? Because the ILC is a repeatable and iterative process that provides a structure for the continuous use of data that can be used to inform and differentiate instruction. It systematizes the continual monitoring of the impact of instruction on students through the use of common formative assessments. The ILC helps teachers identify who is on track for expected learning, who is ahead of expected learning and who needs further support. Additionally, the ILC is a type of professional learning community (PLC) that provides ongoing opportunities for teacher teams to discuss teaching and learning at the classroom level, and by using a PLC model, teacher instructional practices become visible and transparent.
If you are not familiar with PLCs, they provide a structured way for teachers to talk about improving student and adult learning and promote the actions needed to produce results. For those schools that have not already adopted PLCs that focus on ongoing short-term cycles of improvement in the quality of classroom instruction, the Instructional Learning Cycle process provides a defined structure for schools to follow. The next presentation will provide more information on PLCs.
ALL teachers in ALL schools should be using an instructional planning process that helps to ensure effective instruction leading to increased student achievement. MI Excel Schools, however, are required to use an instructional planning process, and the instructional planning process must meet Requirement #7 for Reform and Redesign Plans. Requirement #7 states that a Priority School must promote the continuous use of student data (such as formative, interim, and summative assessment data and student work) to inform and differentiate instruction to meet academic needs of individual students. The Michigan Department of Education has defined the Instructional Learning Cycle, which is an instructional planning process that can help meet this requirement.
Regardless of the instructional planning process selected for implementation, the required features include:
Collaborative team meetings
Identification of learning targets, state standards and common assessments
Identification and alignment of the instructional strategy with the instructional plan
Implementation of a common instructional plan
Collection and analysis of student impact data
Collection and analysis of implementation data
Reflection and next steps
There may be acceptable variations of the “gold standard,” but the process still needs to meet Requirement #7, and the variations need to be agreed upon at the building level.
Click on the link on the screen for more details about the implementation of the required features. [Carrie, please download and then link to document that I’ve attached next to slide.]
This presentation provided an overview of the Instructional Learning Cycle along with its benefits and how it helps Priority Schools meet Requirement #7 for Reform and Redesign Plans. Requirement #7 is the only requirement for Reform and Redesign Plans that gets down to transformation at the classroom level, so effective implementation of the ILC has the potential to make significant improvements in student achievement. The remainder of the course will provide information on professional learning communities and details on each phase of the ILC.