To carry out collaborative developmental
supervision the education program supervisors
(EPS) will sit with the district supervisors and
school heads (SHs) in matters pertaining to
teachers professional needs. The EPS caretaker in
coordination with the district’s PSDS and SHs
shall assess the needs of the teachers based on
class observations, performance of the pupils and
TSNA. With Bulacan’s large number of schools,
the priority in the list would be the schools whose
NAT’s MPS are below 45 percent.
In the management of learning resource
materials, the Division Office shall utilize the
District LRMDS which has been tasked to
conduct inventory of available learning
resource materials in every school.
The said inventory will provide pertinent
information as to status and range of materials
available. It will reveal which LMs need
enrichment to suit the needs of teachers and
learners.
For the staff development, teachers of Grade 2
and 8 have been identified for the K to 12 training.
Those who will serve as trainers have been notified in
advance.
The Teachers in Grades 3 and 4 who shall take
the Test of English Proficiency and Process Skills in
Science and Mathematics on May19 are set to undergo
review sessions under the tutelage of select EPS,
PSDS, school heads and master teachers.
The TEPT results will then be used in crafting
the training to fill the teachers deficiency.
Elementary and secondary school heads with
Intensified monitoring shall still be the
main bulk of the EPSes task in their visits to
the field. With them in the field work are
checklists to assess school heads’ and
teachers’ performance of their respective
duties and functions.
In adherence to strengthened assessment and
evaluation, schedules of such shall be provided in
advance. The partition of competencies per quarter
across learning areas shall be known to the field to
ensure synchronization of teaching in all schools.
A division test item bank is seen as a better way
to make sure that items in quarterly examinations deal
with higher order thinking skills (HOTS).
Assessment of test results shall be used as
basis in giving interventions in classrooms.
The conduct of co - curricular activities
shall be patterned with that of the Regional
Integrated Competencies, Guidelines and
schedule of contests / competitions in all
learning areas shall be provided in advance for
early preparation and for wider participation.
The Division Office sees the private
schools as partners in providing access to
quality education. As such, the D.O. sees to it
that all private schools are operating with legal
papers.
Administrators / owners of private
schools who are still working for their school’s
permit are reminded of time - line / and given
technical assistance.
For a start, a directory of private schools
in the Provincial Division of Bulacan is
displayed at the façade of its building to
inform the public of the status of private
schools.
To achieve fast and efficient processing
of applications for permit and recognition, 23
EPSes are assigned to assist private schools
in their application for permit and government
recognition.
Private school owners / administrators
are met quarterly for information
dissemination on DepEd issues, concerns and
updates.
SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS
ACCESS – Performance Indicators
INDICATOR SY 09-10 SY10-11 SY11-12
TARGETS
2014-
15
2015-16
2016-
17
ELEMENTARY
GER 98.92% 102.70% 102.89%
120.00
%
(+53057
120.00%
120.00
%
NER 85.29% 88.90% 89.66%
98.10%
(+26,17
)
98.10% 98.10%
SECONDARY
GER 83.50% 85.63% 84.46%
110.00%
(+50,58
)
110.00% 110.00%
87.73%
SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS
EFFICIENCY – Performance Indicators
INDICATOR SY 09-10 SY10-11 SY11-12
TARGETS (2014-2015)
Divisio
n
Region EFA
ELEMENTARY
SURVIVAL RATE 87.19% 81.60% 81.49%
82.93%
(+2,446)
86.00% 86.00%
COMPLETERS
RATE
85.35% 79.03% 78.03%
80.37%
(+2,352)
83.00% 83.00%
DROP OUT RATE 2.95% 4.27% 4.31%
0.00%
(-4510)
0.00% 0.00%
SECONDARY
SURVIVAL RATE 82.63% 80.69% 79.92%
85.00%
(+1,666)
85.00% 85.00%
COMPLETERS
RATE
78.05% 76.93% 76.36%
83%
(+2,178)
83.00% 83.00%
DROP OUT RATE 6.37% 7.10% 7.38%
0.00%
(-9,436)
0.00% 0.00%
SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS
Number of Drop-Outs
Causes
LEVEL OF EDUCATION
KINDER ELEM SEC
DOMESTIC/FAMILY-RELATED FACTORS
Had to take care of siblings 7 145 202
Early marriage/pregnancy 1 3 50
Parents’ attitude toward schooling 95 189 22
Family problems 360 1248 742
INDIVIDUAL-RELATED FACTORS
Illness 306 1558 5055
Overage 27 35
Death 4 30 18
Drug Abuse 0 0 2
Poor academic performance 32 122 124
Lack of interest/Distractions 151 223 214
Hunger/Malnutrition 64 237 131
SCHOOL-RELATED FACTORS
Teacher factor 0 0 0
Physical conditions of classroom 1 0 1
Peer influence 3 13 81
GEOGRAPHIC/ENVIRONMENTAL
Distance between home and school 108 347 1365
Armed conflict (incl. tribal wars & clan feuds) 0 0 0
Calamities/Disasters 5 16 0
FINANCIAL-RELATED
Child labor, work 138 834
OTHERS 46 214 560
TOTAL 1183 4510 9436
SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS
QUALITY– NAT (ELEMENTARY)
INDICATOR SY 09-10 SY10-11 SY11-12
TARGETS (2014-2015)
SY
2012-
13
SY
2013-
14
SY
2014-
15
MATHEMATICS 66.24 68.74 67.38 69.40 75.00
ENGLISH 70.86 66.60 68.98 71.05 75.00
SCIENCE 67.78 63.69 70.02 72.12 75.00
FILIPINO 79.01 79.10 72.08 74.24 75.00
HEKASI 74.75 71.14 67.79 69.82 75.00
TOTAL 71.73 69.85 69.25 72.71 74.20
SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS
QUALITY– NAT (SECONDARY)
INDICATOR SY 09-10 SY10-11 SY11-12
TARGETS (2014-2015)
Divisio
n
Region EFA
MATHEMATICS 66.24 68.74 67.38
ENGLISH 70.86 66.60 68.98
SCIENCE 67.78 63.69 70.02
FILIPINO 79.01 79.10 72.08
HEKASI 74.75 71.14 67.79
TOTAL 44.75 46.47 49.60 75.00
 High Percentage of gross & net
enrolment rate
 High percentage of elementary
schools in every barangay
 Equitable distribution of teacher
items in all districts
 Increase in percentage of drop-outs
/leavers
 Low mean percentage score in
National Achievement Test
 High incidence of poverty
 Full engagement of local government
units
 Tie-up with other government
agencies
 Assistance/support from non-
governmental organization
 Calamities
 Change in local government unit
leadership
 Influx of local migrants from Metro
Manila
Summary of Situational
Analysis Results
Strategies Programs & Projects
Priority Problems/Concerns :
a. 4.8% decrease in
dropouts
(elementary)
7.38 decrease in
dropouts
(secondary)
 Implementation of
Intervention in
addressing dropout
problems
 Intensify implementation
of Alternative Delivery
Modes (ADMs)
 DORP
 ALS-A&E
 Mitigation of
hunger/poverty among
learners
 Coordination with LGU
and DSWD in 4Ps
 Learners/ Welfare
Program
School Feeding
Libreng Sakay
Income Generating
Projects
Free School Uniforms
& Supplies
Summary of
Situational Analysis
Results
Strategies Programs & Projects
Priority Problems/Concerns :
b. Big classes in
some secondary
schools located in
urban areas
 Repair/rehabilitation of
school facilities for
maximum utilization
 Modify class
programs/Shifting of
Classes
Establishment of
additional secondary
schools
c. Low MPS in NAT
 Differentiated/Developmental
Supervision
 Collaborative technical
assistance for school heads,
teachers
 Exposure of learners to Higher
Thinking Skills (HOTS)
 Curriculum Materials
 INSETs
 Division-wide NAT
Intervention Plan
 ECARP
 School/District/
Summary of Situational
Analysis Results
Strategies Programs & Projects
Priority Problems/Concerns :
d. Titling and Survey
of
Elementary/Secondar
y School Sites
Inventory of Schools
land titles and sites
Oplan Ayos Titulo
Summary of Situational
Analysis Results
Strategies Programs & Projects
Core Strengths and Opportunities
a. Equitable distribution of
teachers items in all
districts
 Assessment on the
projected increase in
enrolment
 Prompt submission of
reports for teacher
items
 Assignment of teacher
items to schools
needing teachers
 Deployment of PSB
contractual items.
b. Full engagement of
LGUs
 Strengthen
stakeholders
involvement in school
activities
 Efficient and effective
use of resources
School-Based Management
(SBM)
c. High percentage of
gross and net enrolment
 Conduct of community
mapping
 Adherence to Child-
Protection/Friendly
Policy
 Early Enrolment
Registration
 Advocacy Program in all
schools
Summary of Situational
Analysis Results
Strategies Programs & Projects
Core Weaknesses and Threats :
a. High incidence of
poverty
 Intensify livelihood
education in all
schools
 Gulayan sa Paaralan
 YECS Store in School
 Project Recycling
(bottles, papers and
plastics)
b. Prevalence of
common childhood
diseases
 Intensify medical and
dental services in
schools
 Oplan Timbang
 Medical & Dental
Check-up
 Eye Screening
 Distribution of
Vitamins and other
Nutrition
Supplements
 Project:
Deworming/Oplan
Bakuna
Summary of Situational
Analysis Results
Strategies Programs & Projects
Core Weaknesses and Threats :
b. Prevalence of
common childhood
diseases
 Intensify nutrition
and health care
education
 Cook Fest-Vegetable
Recipes
 Search for Nutritious-
Friendly School
Canteen
 Search for Cleanest &
Greenest School
 Little Doctors/Nurses
in School
Summary of Situational
Analysis Results
Strategies Programs & Projects
Core Weaknesses and Threats :
c. Peer Pressure/
Barkada
Influence/Bullying
 Intensify the
School Guidance
Program
 Random
administration of
Drug Testing
 Strict monitoring of
students’ presence
in computer/video
shops and
shopping centers
like SM City,
Robinsons,
Waltermart, South
 Guidance
Counselling
 Values/Guidance
Encampment
 Formation of KID-
Kabataan Iwas
Droga
 Search for Model
Students
Area Strategy Programs
ACCESS
 Implementation of
interventions in addressing
dropout problems
 Intensify implementation of
ADMs
 Mitigation of
hunger/poverty among
learners
 Repair and rehabilitation of
school facilities for
maximum utilization
 Intensify livelihood
education scheme
 Intensify medical and
dental services in schools
 DORP
 ALS-A&E Test
 Feeding Program
 Repair &
rehabilitation
 Gulayan sa
Paaralan
 Medical & Dental
Check-up,
Deworming, Oplan
Timbang & Bakuna
Area Strategy Programs
QUALITY
 Collaborative technical
assistance for school
heads and classroom
teachers
 Indigenization of
Instructional materials
 Incentive/Reward System
for Supervisors, School
Administrators, and
Classroom Teachers
 INSETs
 Division LRMDS
 Search for Bulacan
Outstanding
Administrators,
Teachers and
Supervisors (BOATS)
Area Strategy Programs
GOVERNANCE
 Titling of Schools’ land
titles and sites
 Strengthen stakeholders
involvement in school
activities
 Equitable allocation of
resources
 Efficient and effective use
of resources
 Oplan Ayos Titulo
 Brigada Eskwela
 Public & Private
Partnership
 SBM Training
 Utilization of SBM
Grants
ROMEO M. ALIP, Ph. D., CESO V
Schools Division Superintendent
DEPED BULACAN
FINANCIAL PLAN
MFO 1 : CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION
Source of Fund AMOUNT
1. Differentiated /Developmental
Supervision (Education
Performance Monitoring &
Evaluation)
Provincial SEF P552,000
2. Curriculum Materials
Development
SEF 6,000,000
3. Staff
Development
SEF 800,000
MFO 2 : SCHOOL GOVERNANCE
Source of
Fund
Amount
1. School Effectiveness
Awards and Incentives
Search for Bulacan
Outstanding Teachers
& Administrators
(BOATS)
Provincial
SEF
685,700
SBM training
and monitoring
Utilization of SBM grants
(26 schools)
SBM Fund 67,881
1,300,000
MFO 2 : SCHOOL GOVERNANCE
Source of
Fund
Amount
2. Student Development
English Program & Projects (Elem.
& Secondary)
Attendance in Regional and National
Press Conferences Provincial
SEF
300,000
500,000
Elem. / Sec. Mathematics Program 500,000
Elem. / Sec. Science Programs 650,000
Physical Education and School Dev’t. 7,324,174
Guidance Program 400,000
Music & Arts Program 100,000
MFO 2 : SCHOOL GOVERNANCE
Source of Fund Amount
2. Student Development Provincial SEF
Agriculture Program 800,000
Social Studies Program (Elem. &
Sec.)
350,000
Filipino Program (Elem. & Sec.) 800,000
Industrial Arts Program 400,000
EPP & Nutrition Program (Elem.) 350,000
TLE & Nutrition Program (Sec.) 350,000
Technolympics 300,000
MFO 2 : SCHOOL GOVERNANCE
Source of Fund Amount
2. Student Development SEF
Alternative Learning
Program
SEF 250,000
ICT Programs SEF 150,000
3. Educational Research &
Development
SEF 800,000
MFO : PRIVATE SCHOOLS EFFECTIVENESS
1. Administrative
Monitoring
2. Inspection
for Permits
to Operate
and Recognition
3. Meetings
with School
Administrators
Source of
Fund
AMOUNT
Health Welfare Program SEF 600,000
Purchase of School Sites
(San Juan ES, San Miguel) SEF
450,000
Athletic Supplies for
Sports Fest SEF 2,500,000
Cultural Activities
Development SEF 500,000
Office Supplies /
materials
Division
MOOE
82,941,000
Programs for Gender
and Development
Division
MOOE
6,150,000
SUB-TOTAL MFO 1, 2, 3
Source of Fund AMOUNT
Utilities / (Water) Division MOOE 21,622,000
Telephone
and
internet
Division MOOE 7,258,000
Electricity Division MOOE 1,342,000
Fidelity Bond premiums
of Accountable Officials
Division MOOE 117,000
SUB-TOTAL MFO 1, 2, 3
Source
of Fund
AMOUNT
Repair/Maintenance of Buildings
and facilities
SEF
Division
MOOE
25,000,000
14,668,000
Construction, Purchase &
Improvement of School Facilities
SEF
63,392,100.76
Purchase of Wooden
Desks and Armchairs
SEF 6,000,000
Purchase of Chairs &
Tables for Kinder
SEF 2,000,000
Purchase of Computers
& other Equipment for Schools
SEF
10,841,550
Wages of personnel (contractuals,
Dumagat teachers, benefits)
SEF 52,604,475
SUB-TOTAL MFO 1, 2, 3
Source of Funds TOTAL
1. Provincial SEF 255,000,000
2. Division MOOE 134,098,000
3. SBM Funds 1,367,881
GRAND TOTAL Php390,465,881
RMA/bft
Thank you !

Bulacan-Strategic-Plan-2013-2014.pptx

  • 4.
    To carry outcollaborative developmental supervision the education program supervisors (EPS) will sit with the district supervisors and school heads (SHs) in matters pertaining to teachers professional needs. The EPS caretaker in coordination with the district’s PSDS and SHs shall assess the needs of the teachers based on class observations, performance of the pupils and TSNA. With Bulacan’s large number of schools, the priority in the list would be the schools whose NAT’s MPS are below 45 percent.
  • 5.
    In the managementof learning resource materials, the Division Office shall utilize the District LRMDS which has been tasked to conduct inventory of available learning resource materials in every school. The said inventory will provide pertinent information as to status and range of materials available. It will reveal which LMs need enrichment to suit the needs of teachers and learners.
  • 6.
    For the staffdevelopment, teachers of Grade 2 and 8 have been identified for the K to 12 training. Those who will serve as trainers have been notified in advance. The Teachers in Grades 3 and 4 who shall take the Test of English Proficiency and Process Skills in Science and Mathematics on May19 are set to undergo review sessions under the tutelage of select EPS, PSDS, school heads and master teachers. The TEPT results will then be used in crafting the training to fill the teachers deficiency. Elementary and secondary school heads with
  • 7.
    Intensified monitoring shallstill be the main bulk of the EPSes task in their visits to the field. With them in the field work are checklists to assess school heads’ and teachers’ performance of their respective duties and functions.
  • 8.
    In adherence tostrengthened assessment and evaluation, schedules of such shall be provided in advance. The partition of competencies per quarter across learning areas shall be known to the field to ensure synchronization of teaching in all schools. A division test item bank is seen as a better way to make sure that items in quarterly examinations deal with higher order thinking skills (HOTS). Assessment of test results shall be used as basis in giving interventions in classrooms.
  • 9.
    The conduct ofco - curricular activities shall be patterned with that of the Regional Integrated Competencies, Guidelines and schedule of contests / competitions in all learning areas shall be provided in advance for early preparation and for wider participation.
  • 10.
    The Division Officesees the private schools as partners in providing access to quality education. As such, the D.O. sees to it that all private schools are operating with legal papers. Administrators / owners of private schools who are still working for their school’s permit are reminded of time - line / and given technical assistance.
  • 11.
    For a start,a directory of private schools in the Provincial Division of Bulacan is displayed at the façade of its building to inform the public of the status of private schools. To achieve fast and efficient processing of applications for permit and recognition, 23 EPSes are assigned to assist private schools in their application for permit and government recognition.
  • 12.
    Private school owners/ administrators are met quarterly for information dissemination on DepEd issues, concerns and updates.
  • 14.
    SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS ACCESS –Performance Indicators INDICATOR SY 09-10 SY10-11 SY11-12 TARGETS 2014- 15 2015-16 2016- 17 ELEMENTARY GER 98.92% 102.70% 102.89% 120.00 % (+53057 120.00% 120.00 % NER 85.29% 88.90% 89.66% 98.10% (+26,17 ) 98.10% 98.10% SECONDARY GER 83.50% 85.63% 84.46% 110.00% (+50,58 ) 110.00% 110.00% 87.73%
  • 15.
    SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS EFFICIENCY –Performance Indicators INDICATOR SY 09-10 SY10-11 SY11-12 TARGETS (2014-2015) Divisio n Region EFA ELEMENTARY SURVIVAL RATE 87.19% 81.60% 81.49% 82.93% (+2,446) 86.00% 86.00% COMPLETERS RATE 85.35% 79.03% 78.03% 80.37% (+2,352) 83.00% 83.00% DROP OUT RATE 2.95% 4.27% 4.31% 0.00% (-4510) 0.00% 0.00% SECONDARY SURVIVAL RATE 82.63% 80.69% 79.92% 85.00% (+1,666) 85.00% 85.00% COMPLETERS RATE 78.05% 76.93% 76.36% 83% (+2,178) 83.00% 83.00% DROP OUT RATE 6.37% 7.10% 7.38% 0.00% (-9,436) 0.00% 0.00%
  • 16.
    SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS Number ofDrop-Outs Causes LEVEL OF EDUCATION KINDER ELEM SEC DOMESTIC/FAMILY-RELATED FACTORS Had to take care of siblings 7 145 202 Early marriage/pregnancy 1 3 50 Parents’ attitude toward schooling 95 189 22 Family problems 360 1248 742 INDIVIDUAL-RELATED FACTORS Illness 306 1558 5055 Overage 27 35 Death 4 30 18 Drug Abuse 0 0 2 Poor academic performance 32 122 124 Lack of interest/Distractions 151 223 214 Hunger/Malnutrition 64 237 131 SCHOOL-RELATED FACTORS Teacher factor 0 0 0 Physical conditions of classroom 1 0 1 Peer influence 3 13 81 GEOGRAPHIC/ENVIRONMENTAL Distance between home and school 108 347 1365 Armed conflict (incl. tribal wars & clan feuds) 0 0 0 Calamities/Disasters 5 16 0 FINANCIAL-RELATED Child labor, work 138 834 OTHERS 46 214 560 TOTAL 1183 4510 9436
  • 17.
    SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS QUALITY– NAT(ELEMENTARY) INDICATOR SY 09-10 SY10-11 SY11-12 TARGETS (2014-2015) SY 2012- 13 SY 2013- 14 SY 2014- 15 MATHEMATICS 66.24 68.74 67.38 69.40 75.00 ENGLISH 70.86 66.60 68.98 71.05 75.00 SCIENCE 67.78 63.69 70.02 72.12 75.00 FILIPINO 79.01 79.10 72.08 74.24 75.00 HEKASI 74.75 71.14 67.79 69.82 75.00 TOTAL 71.73 69.85 69.25 72.71 74.20
  • 18.
    SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS QUALITY– NAT(SECONDARY) INDICATOR SY 09-10 SY10-11 SY11-12 TARGETS (2014-2015) Divisio n Region EFA MATHEMATICS 66.24 68.74 67.38 ENGLISH 70.86 66.60 68.98 SCIENCE 67.78 63.69 70.02 FILIPINO 79.01 79.10 72.08 HEKASI 74.75 71.14 67.79 TOTAL 44.75 46.47 49.60 75.00
  • 19.
     High Percentageof gross & net enrolment rate  High percentage of elementary schools in every barangay  Equitable distribution of teacher items in all districts  Increase in percentage of drop-outs /leavers  Low mean percentage score in National Achievement Test  High incidence of poverty  Full engagement of local government units  Tie-up with other government agencies  Assistance/support from non- governmental organization  Calamities  Change in local government unit leadership  Influx of local migrants from Metro Manila
  • 20.
    Summary of Situational AnalysisResults Strategies Programs & Projects Priority Problems/Concerns : a. 4.8% decrease in dropouts (elementary) 7.38 decrease in dropouts (secondary)  Implementation of Intervention in addressing dropout problems  Intensify implementation of Alternative Delivery Modes (ADMs)  DORP  ALS-A&E  Mitigation of hunger/poverty among learners  Coordination with LGU and DSWD in 4Ps  Learners/ Welfare Program School Feeding Libreng Sakay Income Generating Projects Free School Uniforms & Supplies
  • 21.
    Summary of Situational Analysis Results StrategiesPrograms & Projects Priority Problems/Concerns : b. Big classes in some secondary schools located in urban areas  Repair/rehabilitation of school facilities for maximum utilization  Modify class programs/Shifting of Classes Establishment of additional secondary schools c. Low MPS in NAT  Differentiated/Developmental Supervision  Collaborative technical assistance for school heads, teachers  Exposure of learners to Higher Thinking Skills (HOTS)  Curriculum Materials  INSETs  Division-wide NAT Intervention Plan  ECARP  School/District/
  • 22.
    Summary of Situational AnalysisResults Strategies Programs & Projects Priority Problems/Concerns : d. Titling and Survey of Elementary/Secondar y School Sites Inventory of Schools land titles and sites Oplan Ayos Titulo
  • 23.
    Summary of Situational AnalysisResults Strategies Programs & Projects Core Strengths and Opportunities a. Equitable distribution of teachers items in all districts  Assessment on the projected increase in enrolment  Prompt submission of reports for teacher items  Assignment of teacher items to schools needing teachers  Deployment of PSB contractual items. b. Full engagement of LGUs  Strengthen stakeholders involvement in school activities  Efficient and effective use of resources School-Based Management (SBM) c. High percentage of gross and net enrolment  Conduct of community mapping  Adherence to Child- Protection/Friendly Policy  Early Enrolment Registration  Advocacy Program in all schools
  • 24.
    Summary of Situational AnalysisResults Strategies Programs & Projects Core Weaknesses and Threats : a. High incidence of poverty  Intensify livelihood education in all schools  Gulayan sa Paaralan  YECS Store in School  Project Recycling (bottles, papers and plastics) b. Prevalence of common childhood diseases  Intensify medical and dental services in schools  Oplan Timbang  Medical & Dental Check-up  Eye Screening  Distribution of Vitamins and other Nutrition Supplements  Project: Deworming/Oplan Bakuna
  • 25.
    Summary of Situational AnalysisResults Strategies Programs & Projects Core Weaknesses and Threats : b. Prevalence of common childhood diseases  Intensify nutrition and health care education  Cook Fest-Vegetable Recipes  Search for Nutritious- Friendly School Canteen  Search for Cleanest & Greenest School  Little Doctors/Nurses in School
  • 26.
    Summary of Situational AnalysisResults Strategies Programs & Projects Core Weaknesses and Threats : c. Peer Pressure/ Barkada Influence/Bullying  Intensify the School Guidance Program  Random administration of Drug Testing  Strict monitoring of students’ presence in computer/video shops and shopping centers like SM City, Robinsons, Waltermart, South  Guidance Counselling  Values/Guidance Encampment  Formation of KID- Kabataan Iwas Droga  Search for Model Students
  • 27.
    Area Strategy Programs ACCESS Implementation of interventions in addressing dropout problems  Intensify implementation of ADMs  Mitigation of hunger/poverty among learners  Repair and rehabilitation of school facilities for maximum utilization  Intensify livelihood education scheme  Intensify medical and dental services in schools  DORP  ALS-A&E Test  Feeding Program  Repair & rehabilitation  Gulayan sa Paaralan  Medical & Dental Check-up, Deworming, Oplan Timbang & Bakuna
  • 28.
    Area Strategy Programs QUALITY Collaborative technical assistance for school heads and classroom teachers  Indigenization of Instructional materials  Incentive/Reward System for Supervisors, School Administrators, and Classroom Teachers  INSETs  Division LRMDS  Search for Bulacan Outstanding Administrators, Teachers and Supervisors (BOATS)
  • 29.
    Area Strategy Programs GOVERNANCE Titling of Schools’ land titles and sites  Strengthen stakeholders involvement in school activities  Equitable allocation of resources  Efficient and effective use of resources  Oplan Ayos Titulo  Brigada Eskwela  Public & Private Partnership  SBM Training  Utilization of SBM Grants
  • 30.
    ROMEO M. ALIP,Ph. D., CESO V Schools Division Superintendent DEPED BULACAN FINANCIAL PLAN
  • 31.
    MFO 1 :CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION Source of Fund AMOUNT 1. Differentiated /Developmental Supervision (Education Performance Monitoring & Evaluation) Provincial SEF P552,000 2. Curriculum Materials Development SEF 6,000,000 3. Staff Development SEF 800,000
  • 32.
    MFO 2 :SCHOOL GOVERNANCE Source of Fund Amount 1. School Effectiveness Awards and Incentives Search for Bulacan Outstanding Teachers & Administrators (BOATS) Provincial SEF 685,700 SBM training and monitoring Utilization of SBM grants (26 schools) SBM Fund 67,881 1,300,000
  • 33.
    MFO 2 :SCHOOL GOVERNANCE Source of Fund Amount 2. Student Development English Program & Projects (Elem. & Secondary) Attendance in Regional and National Press Conferences Provincial SEF 300,000 500,000 Elem. / Sec. Mathematics Program 500,000 Elem. / Sec. Science Programs 650,000 Physical Education and School Dev’t. 7,324,174 Guidance Program 400,000 Music & Arts Program 100,000
  • 34.
    MFO 2 :SCHOOL GOVERNANCE Source of Fund Amount 2. Student Development Provincial SEF Agriculture Program 800,000 Social Studies Program (Elem. & Sec.) 350,000 Filipino Program (Elem. & Sec.) 800,000 Industrial Arts Program 400,000 EPP & Nutrition Program (Elem.) 350,000 TLE & Nutrition Program (Sec.) 350,000 Technolympics 300,000
  • 35.
    MFO 2 :SCHOOL GOVERNANCE Source of Fund Amount 2. Student Development SEF Alternative Learning Program SEF 250,000 ICT Programs SEF 150,000 3. Educational Research & Development SEF 800,000
  • 36.
    MFO : PRIVATESCHOOLS EFFECTIVENESS 1. Administrative Monitoring 2. Inspection for Permits to Operate and Recognition 3. Meetings with School Administrators
  • 37.
    Source of Fund AMOUNT Health WelfareProgram SEF 600,000 Purchase of School Sites (San Juan ES, San Miguel) SEF 450,000 Athletic Supplies for Sports Fest SEF 2,500,000 Cultural Activities Development SEF 500,000 Office Supplies / materials Division MOOE 82,941,000 Programs for Gender and Development Division MOOE 6,150,000 SUB-TOTAL MFO 1, 2, 3
  • 38.
    Source of FundAMOUNT Utilities / (Water) Division MOOE 21,622,000 Telephone and internet Division MOOE 7,258,000 Electricity Division MOOE 1,342,000 Fidelity Bond premiums of Accountable Officials Division MOOE 117,000 SUB-TOTAL MFO 1, 2, 3
  • 39.
    Source of Fund AMOUNT Repair/Maintenance ofBuildings and facilities SEF Division MOOE 25,000,000 14,668,000 Construction, Purchase & Improvement of School Facilities SEF 63,392,100.76 Purchase of Wooden Desks and Armchairs SEF 6,000,000 Purchase of Chairs & Tables for Kinder SEF 2,000,000 Purchase of Computers & other Equipment for Schools SEF 10,841,550 Wages of personnel (contractuals, Dumagat teachers, benefits) SEF 52,604,475 SUB-TOTAL MFO 1, 2, 3
  • 40.
    Source of FundsTOTAL 1. Provincial SEF 255,000,000 2. Division MOOE 134,098,000 3. SBM Funds 1,367,881 GRAND TOTAL Php390,465,881
  • 41.