Research Needs in Crisis Management - a European Perspective
•
1 like•1,041 views
The document discusses the work of the ESRIF WG4 Crisis Management group. It outlines their analysis of main crisis management threats, challenges, and priority areas for research. These include improving education and training, communications systems, and cooperation/coordination across borders and organizations. The group developed recommendations to address interoperability, resource sharing, and other long-term challenges in crisis management.
![Profile - Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft - ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recommended
More Related Content
Similar to Research Needs in Crisis Management - a European Perspective
Similar to Research Needs in Crisis Management - a European Perspective (20)
More from Global Risk Forum GRFDavos
More from Global Risk Forum GRFDavos (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Research Needs in Crisis Management - a European Perspective
- 1. ESRIF WG4 Crisis Management Research Needs in Crisis Management – a European Perspective IDRC Davos 2010 – Workshop WED 3.3 Davos, 2nd June 2010 Hans-Martin Pastuszka (Ex-Sherpa ESRIF WG4) Fraunhofer Institute for Technological Trend Analysis (INT), Germany
- 3. Introduction into ESRIF Evolution of Security Research in Europe PASR (2004-2006) 45 M€ time 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 FP7 Security Theme (2007 -2013) 1400 M€ ESRAB report “Meeting the challenge: the European Security Research Agenda” (Oct 2006) ESRAB (2005-2006) “ European Security Research: The Next Steps” (Sept 2004) GoP report “Research for a secure Europe” (March 2004) GoP (2003-2004) ESRIF (2007-2009) “ Fostering Public-Private Dialogue in Security Research and Innovation” (Sept 2007) Various national programmes 2004 SRC’06 Vienna SRC’07 Berlin SRC’08 Paris SRC’09 Stockholm SRC’10 Oostende ESRIF Final Report & Commission’s Initial Position (Dec 2009) 2014
- 10. WG4 Crisis Management Priority areas for research & innovation Recovery Logistics Medical & Psycho- social Support Resource Management Communication Co-operation Situational Awareness & Decision Making Management Concepts Simulation Planning The Response Forces The Public CM
- 19. WG4 Crisis Management - Example: Complexity of information and coordination needs in EU external CM - Rosters of experts, Assessment of research results, Test and Adaptation of technologies Expert Advice, Assessment Missions, Evidence-based analysis Information Requests Work Coordination EU Research projects EU Agencies and Research Centres Commercial Service Providers EU Satellite Centre Technical Depts of Int’ l Orgs (UN, WB, ..) Crisis Platform ENV/MIC ECHO RELEX DEV, AIDCO PSC EU SitCen Int’l Orgs TREN EU Member States JLS SANCO ENTR, RTD, INFSO CIVCOM EUMS Partner Orgs (regional, NGOs) Public Service Providers in MS SG - ARGUS Receive requests, Provide Information Source: DG RELEX (2008) EU Commission layer
- 21. Contact: Hans-Martin Pastuszka Fraunhofer Institute for Technological Trend Analysis (INT) Appelsgarten 2 53879 Euskirchen, Germany Phone: +49 22 51 18 298 E-Mail: [email_address] www.int.fraunhofer.de www.esrif.eu
- 22. ESRIF - The Concept - Integration Team 11 working groups >600 Working group leaders & rapporteurs European Security Research and Innovation Forum Public Private Dialogue (PPD) European – national (EU MS + Associated Countries*) Demand side – supply side – civil society side 63 Annual public event: SRC’08 SRC’09 Chairman + 2 deputy chairmen + 2 Contact Points EC * associated are: Croatia, FYROM, Iceland, Israel, Liechtenstein, Norway, Serbia, Switzerland, Turkey
- 23. ESRIF Roadmap „ Security Cycle”
Editor's Notes
- Fraunhofer INT: Trends and Developments in R&T (Technology Analyses and Foresight) Technology Monitoring Technology Foresight In-depth Analyses in selected Technology Areas Plans, Programs & Structures in R&T (Meta Analyses and Planning Support) National Research & Technology (R&T) International R&T Security Research Information Management and Methodology Nuclear Effects & Threats Nuclear Security Policy and Nuclear Detection Radiation Effects in Electronics and Optoelectronics Electromagnetic Effects & Threats EME HPM
- Social Security European security is inseparable from the social, cultural and political values that distinguish European life in all its diversity. Security research and innovation must address the long-term vulnerability of these values via European economic, cultural, political, and technological systems. Societal Resilience Given the unpredictability of man-made and natural threats, security research and innovation should focus on strengthening Europe’s inherent resilience and ability to efficiently recover from crises by enhancing the cohesiveness and robustness of societal systems and their interface with security technologies. Trust Security implies nurturing trust among people, institutions and technologies. Under conditions of threat trust enhances transparency and social inclusion. It plays a decisive role at the interface between citizens and governments, social services and institutions, information agencies, ICT and other technological systems, and local and global markets. Interoperability Security organizations increasingly face technical, operational, and human interoperability issues at their geographical and organizational borders. A vigorous political will to share assets and standards across Europe will empower us all in jointly handling the security issues posed by a progressively more interlinked world. A systematic approach to capability development The growing complexity of security demands increasing sophistication in strategic foresight and risk assessment, modular generic capabilities and solutions at the system-of-systems level. Industrial policy Europe has a strong extensive industrial capability and knowledge base in the security field, but represents a fragmented market. Rectifying this would open the door to global leadership in the security market, and spawn an efficient European industry, making our society best security solutions available to the world. This ambition requires a clear political choice and a persuasive European industrial policy. Innovation To preserve its security, Europe must have strong in-house scientific, technological and industrial competencies. It is important to capitalize on this knowledge through pooling and clustering to maximize synergy between different technologies, stakeholders and services and in establishing a systematic interaction between demand and supply to ensure that security solutions are effectively tailored to meet operational needs. Security by design Securing the future will require that security be treated as integral part of any given system, process or operation from the point of conceptualization onward. Current add-on security solutions no longer suffice, Europe needs a systemic approach to security. Awareness raising through education and training Education and scenario-based training contribute significantly to the overall acknowledgement and recognition that security is a common responsibility of all stakeholders, especially, policymakers, regulators and citizens.