A knowledge worker is someone who is employed because of his or her knowledge of a subject matter, rather than ability to perform manual labor. They perform best when empowered to make the most of their deepest skills.
This is my presentation from the IIM National Conference on 15 August 2007. I'm hoping to cause a little bit of a stir and push a few people out of their comfort zones.
There are three embedded videos that don't work on SlideShare. Use the URLs on the relevant pages to view the videos at YouTube.
There are a lot of slides, but the whole thing runs about 40 minutes in real life.
Partial notes on BBA 205 course for students of IP University (Delhi) and anyone who wants a beginner's level knowledge.
Citations are reflected in the slides.
A knowledge worker is someone who is employed because of his or her knowledge of a subject matter, rather than ability to perform manual labor. They perform best when empowered to make the most of their deepest skills.
This is my presentation from the IIM National Conference on 15 August 2007. I'm hoping to cause a little bit of a stir and push a few people out of their comfort zones.
There are three embedded videos that don't work on SlideShare. Use the URLs on the relevant pages to view the videos at YouTube.
There are a lot of slides, but the whole thing runs about 40 minutes in real life.
Partial notes on BBA 205 course for students of IP University (Delhi) and anyone who wants a beginner's level knowledge.
Citations are reflected in the slides.
Gary Hamel defines management innovation as a marked departure from traditional management principles, processes, and practices (or a departure from customary organizational forms that significantly alters the way the work of management is performed). He deems it the prime driver of sustainable competitive advantage in the 21st century.
Issues in the case study of "Global Knowledge Management at Danone" has been discussed. The issues are:
1- Creating knowledge cultures
2- Knowledge application
3- To extend the Networking Attitude
People gain knowledge if they learn from experience. Learning is thus a vital component of knowledge management and its ultimate end. Collective learning comes from participating in the social processes of collaboration, sharing knowledge, and building on one another's ideas.
Creative and innovative leadership visioning for organizational efficiencyTANKO AHMED fwc
Smart visionary leadership is able to synthesize different styles in response to organizational exigencies for efficiency. Creativity and innovation are twin drivers for leadership visioning focused on organizational efficiency. This paper discusses strategy making process for organizational efficiency and its adaption in the real world. An appended simulation exercise tasks application of lessons learnt on two leading process-centric agencies in Nigeria.
Belinda Reynolds, a speaker at the marcus evans HR Summit 2012, on the importance of having diversity within an organisation.
Interview with: Belinda Reynolds, Workforce and Diversity Manager, IBM
Organizations implementing knowledge strategies generally go through five stages: pre-implementation, implementation, reinvigoration, inculcation, and holistic. This presentation details steps ADB took in 2008–2011 to initiate, develop, standardize, optimize, and innovate knowledge management and learning.
Introduction
Why knowledge and knowledge management
What is KM
Knowledge Evolution Process
Types of Knowledge
KM Approaches – Overview
Knowledge Creation Model
This presentation provides real-world data that connects people development, talent management, and human resources with real, bottom line business results. We look at how more effective communication, more informed and productive teams and stronger attention to solid leadership practices can help reap big benefits to all aspects of an organization - including the bottom line. This presentation highlights industry stats that help make the case for why training and development of employees is critical to building healthy, profitable and sustainable organizations.
Learn more about these stats and a full range of products that can help build these capabilities at www.emergenetics.com
Gary Hamel defines management innovation as a marked departure from traditional management principles, processes, and practices (or a departure from customary organizational forms that significantly alters the way the work of management is performed). He deems it the prime driver of sustainable competitive advantage in the 21st century.
Issues in the case study of "Global Knowledge Management at Danone" has been discussed. The issues are:
1- Creating knowledge cultures
2- Knowledge application
3- To extend the Networking Attitude
People gain knowledge if they learn from experience. Learning is thus a vital component of knowledge management and its ultimate end. Collective learning comes from participating in the social processes of collaboration, sharing knowledge, and building on one another's ideas.
Creative and innovative leadership visioning for organizational efficiencyTANKO AHMED fwc
Smart visionary leadership is able to synthesize different styles in response to organizational exigencies for efficiency. Creativity and innovation are twin drivers for leadership visioning focused on organizational efficiency. This paper discusses strategy making process for organizational efficiency and its adaption in the real world. An appended simulation exercise tasks application of lessons learnt on two leading process-centric agencies in Nigeria.
Belinda Reynolds, a speaker at the marcus evans HR Summit 2012, on the importance of having diversity within an organisation.
Interview with: Belinda Reynolds, Workforce and Diversity Manager, IBM
Organizations implementing knowledge strategies generally go through five stages: pre-implementation, implementation, reinvigoration, inculcation, and holistic. This presentation details steps ADB took in 2008–2011 to initiate, develop, standardize, optimize, and innovate knowledge management and learning.
Introduction
Why knowledge and knowledge management
What is KM
Knowledge Evolution Process
Types of Knowledge
KM Approaches – Overview
Knowledge Creation Model
This presentation provides real-world data that connects people development, talent management, and human resources with real, bottom line business results. We look at how more effective communication, more informed and productive teams and stronger attention to solid leadership practices can help reap big benefits to all aspects of an organization - including the bottom line. This presentation highlights industry stats that help make the case for why training and development of employees is critical to building healthy, profitable and sustainable organizations.
Learn more about these stats and a full range of products that can help build these capabilities at www.emergenetics.com
This article,published in June of 2011 in the International Journal of Management, was inspired by a challenge I saw in workplaces not being able to retain their best and brightest.
Reaching Peak Performance for Knowledge WorkersRichard Thripp
A presentation about attention- and time-management for "knowledge workers": people who solve problems and approach problems creatively, and who deal primarily in knowledge (mental labor) rather than physical (manual) labor.
Prepared and presented by Richard Thripp of Toastmasters of Port Orange, FL on 2015-05-20, in fulfillment of Competent Communication Project #6: "Vocal Variety" in the Toastmasters curriculum.
Building a Compensation Plan Part 2: Develop a Market-Based Pay StructurePayScale, Inc.
HR leaders aiming to develop and maintain pay ranges within their organizations face a Goldilocks problem. If too narrow, the pay ranges won’t allow an organization to reward long-tenured staff or high performers. Too broad, and the pay ranges won’t provide practical support for your compensation philosophy. But, worst of all, having no ranges at all can lead to a failure to attract top talent, or dramatically overpaying employees.
So, how can you get pay ranges just right?
Join us as Stacey Carroll, CCP, SPHR, reveals how to develop ranges from a market-centered midpoint.
You’ll learn:
How to use market data to update or create competitive pay ranges.
How to select a competitive market set for benchmarking against.
How to choose benchmark positions and slot non-benchmark positions into your structure.
This practical webinar will give you the information necessary to update or create market ranges in your organization.
Building a Compensation Plan Part 1: Strategy & Executive SupportPayScale, Inc.
Your compensation strategy is the cornerstone of an effective compensation plan, and without one you’ll face more difficulty and opposition when it comes time to implement your plan. By investing time in defining your compensation strategy you’ll increase the likelihood of gaining executive support for your compensation plan as well.
Join us for part one of Building a Compensation Plan and learn:
Why a compensation strategy is so critical
The three questions that help define your compensation strategy
How to get senior leadership involved in your plan.
You’ll walk away from this session with crucial knowledge of how to build a foundation under your compensation strategy that supports business priorities and gets your executive team on board. Skip step one at your own peril.
Knowledge Sharing in Workplace: Motivators and DemotivatorsIJMIT JOURNAL
This paper gives an overview of knowledge sharing in workplace. Based on the review of critical literatures by the authors, they infer that knowledge sharing in workplace can be influenced by motivators and
demotivators. Activities of knowledge sharing in organizations may be on organization level or individual
level. Knowledge sharing of both levels is critical to the success or failure of knowledge management inside
and outside of organizations. Age, culture, and industry were all found to affect knowledge sharing among workers. A common stereotype is that older workers hoard knowledge because they are more insecure and feel threatened by younger workers. Since older workers have more valuable knowledge, younger workers
needed to entice their older colleagues to share their valuable knowledge with them. The paper focus on
motivators and demotivators to sharing Knowledge in workplace. Theories and research pertaining to why
workers share knowledge are reviewed. While all industry need knowledge and innovation, it is also true
that the pace of change and the need to innovate differs from industry to industry. Technology was
acknowledged to have a high important role in increasing productivity of knowledge sharing. It plays a critical role in creating, storing and distributing explicit knowledge in an accessible and expeditious manner.
An Analytical Study on Knowledge Sharing within the Organizationijcnes
The better management of knowledge within the organization will lead to improved innovation and competitive advantage. The main goal of the firm� better utilization of internal and external knowledge. This core knowledge is found in individuals, communities of interest and their connections. An organization�s data is found in its computer systems but a company�s intelligence is found, in its biological and social systems. Though it is acclaimed as a good method, there are some setbacks in the process of knowledge sharing[KS] among the employees. This paper explores the possible ways to establish organization using social computing tools to facilitate Knowledge Sharing and create a social data mining among all the members of organization. Social Data Mining Network Analysis (SDMNA) techniques have been used to study KS patterns which take place between employees and departments. This SDMNA graph reveals the structure of social data mining network highlighting connectivity, clustering and strength of relationships between employees.
Course Outline
Introduction
1. What is Knowledge?
Explicit & Tacit Knowledge
-Positivist Perspective of Knowledge
-Social Constructivism Perspective of Knowledge
2. What is Knowledge Management?
3. How does KM contribute to Schools?
4. The Nonaka and Takeuchi Knowledge
Management Model
5. The SECI Model and Japanese Lesson Study
Four modes of knowledge conversion
-socialization, -externalization, -combination, -internalization
6. Knowledge Management Strategy
Similar to How to Motivate and Retain Knowledge Workers (20)
Here are a sample of slides drawn from a client session to educated wellness managers in an assisted living care home, on how to support nursing staff performance.
These are a sample of slides from a session on how to engineer crew performance, delivered to 100+ construction managers with asphalt plants. They were struggling with poor worker performance and wanted to gain some insight.
This presentation was very well received by both the International Personnel Management Association and the Canadian Society for Training and Development's professional events for members in May 2012.
Here are my slides for my session for the International Institute of Business Analysis (May 23, 2012). I focus on best practices of survey design, highlighting qualitative data.
Here is my published article from Performance Improvement that netted me the final credit for a Master's in Instructional and Performance Technology along with a speaking engagement in Ireland. The Six-P is a holistic framework developed by one of my professors at Boise State University, Dr. Anthony Marker and some of his graduate students.
Have you ever felt stuck, not wanting to do something? Been stumped about ways to effectively motivate your staff? Look no further! This session will provide you with some insights into motivation. We will consider pain and pleasure as motivators, intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, and some strategies that will help keep you and your employees motivated for high performance and productive work in your business.
Cracking the Workplace Discipline Code Main.pptxWorkforce Group
Cultivating and maintaining discipline within teams is a critical differentiator for successful organisations.
Forward-thinking leaders and business managers understand the impact that discipline has on organisational success. A disciplined workforce operates with clarity, focus, and a shared understanding of expectations, ultimately driving better results, optimising productivity, and facilitating seamless collaboration.
Although discipline is not a one-size-fits-all approach, it can help create a work environment that encourages personal growth and accountability rather than solely relying on punitive measures.
In this deck, you will learn the significance of workplace discipline for organisational success. You’ll also learn
• Four (4) workplace discipline methods you should consider
• The best and most practical approach to implementing workplace discipline.
• Three (3) key tips to maintain a disciplined workplace.
"𝑩𝑬𝑮𝑼𝑵 𝑾𝑰𝑻𝑯 𝑻𝑱 𝑰𝑺 𝑯𝑨𝑳𝑭 𝑫𝑶𝑵𝑬"
𝐓𝐉 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐬 (𝐓𝐉 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬) is a professional event agency that includes experts in the event-organizing market in Vietnam, Korea, and ASEAN countries. We provide unlimited types of events from Music concerts, Fan meetings, and Culture festivals to Corporate events, Internal company events, Golf tournaments, MICE events, and Exhibitions.
𝐓𝐉 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐬 provides unlimited package services including such as Event organizing, Event planning, Event production, Manpower, PR marketing, Design 2D/3D, VIP protocols, Interpreter agency, etc.
Sports events - Golf competitions/billiards competitions/company sports events: dynamic and challenging
⭐ 𝐅𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐣𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐬:
➢ 2024 BAEKHYUN [Lonsdaleite] IN HO CHI MINH
➢ SUPER JUNIOR-L.S.S. THE SHOW : Th3ee Guys in HO CHI MINH
➢FreenBecky 1st Fan Meeting in Vietnam
➢CHILDREN ART EXHIBITION 2024: BEYOND BARRIERS
➢ WOW K-Music Festival 2023
➢ Winner [CROSS] Tour in HCM
➢ Super Show 9 in HCM with Super Junior
➢ HCMC - Gyeongsangbuk-do Culture and Tourism Festival
➢ Korean Vietnam Partnership - Fair with LG
➢ Korean President visits Samsung Electronics R&D Center
➢ Vietnam Food Expo with Lotte Wellfood
"𝐄𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐚 𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲, 𝐚 𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐣𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐧𝐞𝐲. 𝐖𝐞 𝐚𝐥𝐰𝐚𝐲𝐬 𝐛𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐯𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐥𝐲 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐰𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐛𝐞 𝐚 𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐬."
Affordable Stationery Printing Services in Jaipur | Navpack n PrintNavpack & Print
Looking for professional printing services in Jaipur? Navpack n Print offers high-quality and affordable stationery printing for all your business needs. Stand out with custom stationery designs and fast turnaround times. Contact us today for a quote!
What is the TDS Return Filing Due Date for FY 2024-25.pdfseoforlegalpillers
It is crucial for the taxpayers to understand about the TDS Return Filing Due Date, so that they can fulfill your TDS obligations efficiently. Taxpayers can avoid penalties by sticking to the deadlines and by accurate filing of TDS. Timely filing of TDS will make sure about the availability of tax credits. You can also seek the professional guidance of experts like Legal Pillers for timely filing of the TDS Return.
Putting the SPARK into Virtual Training.pptxCynthia Clay
This 60-minute webinar, sponsored by Adobe, was delivered for the Training Mag Network. It explored the five elements of SPARK: Storytelling, Purpose, Action, Relationships, and Kudos. Knowing how to tell a well-structured story is key to building long-term memory. Stating a clear purpose that doesn't take away from the discovery learning process is critical. Ensuring that people move from theory to practical application is imperative. Creating strong social learning is the key to commitment and engagement. Validating and affirming participants' comments is the way to create a positive learning environment.
Discover the innovative and creative projects that highlight my journey throu...dylandmeas
Discover the innovative and creative projects that highlight my journey through Full Sail University. Below, you’ll find a collection of my work showcasing my skills and expertise in digital marketing, event planning, and media production.
Explore our most comprehensive guide on lookback analysis at SafePaaS, covering access governance and how it can transform modern ERP audits. Browse now!
Falcon stands out as a top-tier P2P Invoice Discounting platform in India, bridging esteemed blue-chip companies and eager investors. Our goal is to transform the investment landscape in India by establishing a comprehensive destination for borrowers and investors with diverse profiles and needs, all while minimizing risk. What sets Falcon apart is the elimination of intermediaries such as commercial banks and depository institutions, allowing investors to enjoy higher yields.
Improving profitability for small businessBen Wann
In this comprehensive presentation, we will explore strategies and practical tips for enhancing profitability in small businesses. Tailored to meet the unique challenges faced by small enterprises, this session covers various aspects that directly impact the bottom line. Attendees will learn how to optimize operational efficiency, manage expenses, and increase revenue through innovative marketing and customer engagement techniques.
Enterprise Excellence is Inclusive Excellence.pdfKaiNexus
Enterprise excellence and inclusive excellence are closely linked, and real-world challenges have shown that both are essential to the success of any organization. To achieve enterprise excellence, organizations must focus on improving their operations and processes while creating an inclusive environment that engages everyone. In this interactive session, the facilitator will highlight commonly established business practices and how they limit our ability to engage everyone every day. More importantly, though, participants will likely gain increased awareness of what we can do differently to maximize enterprise excellence through deliberate inclusion.
What is Enterprise Excellence?
Enterprise Excellence is a holistic approach that's aimed at achieving world-class performance across all aspects of the organization.
What might I learn?
A way to engage all in creating Inclusive Excellence. Lessons from the US military and their parallels to the story of Harry Potter. How belt systems and CI teams can destroy inclusive practices. How leadership language invites people to the party. There are three things leaders can do to engage everyone every day: maximizing psychological safety to create environments where folks learn, contribute, and challenge the status quo.
Who might benefit? Anyone and everyone leading folks from the shop floor to top floor.
Dr. William Harvey is a seasoned Operations Leader with extensive experience in chemical processing, manufacturing, and operations management. At Michelman, he currently oversees multiple sites, leading teams in strategic planning and coaching/practicing continuous improvement. William is set to start his eighth year of teaching at the University of Cincinnati where he teaches marketing, finance, and management. William holds various certifications in change management, quality, leadership, operational excellence, team building, and DiSC, among others.
Skye Residences | Extended Stay Residences Near Toronto Airportmarketingjdass
Experience unparalleled EXTENDED STAY and comfort at Skye Residences located just minutes from Toronto Airport. Discover sophisticated accommodations tailored for discerning travelers.
Website Link :
https://skyeresidences.com/
https://skyeresidences.com/about-us/
https://skyeresidences.com/gallery/
https://skyeresidences.com/rooms/
https://skyeresidences.com/near-by-attractions/
https://skyeresidences.com/commute/
https://skyeresidences.com/contact/
https://skyeresidences.com/queen-suite-with-sofa-bed/
https://skyeresidences.com/queen-suite-with-sofa-bed-and-balcony/
https://skyeresidences.com/queen-suite-with-sofa-bed-accessible/
https://skyeresidences.com/2-bedroom-deluxe-queen-suite-with-sofa-bed/
https://skyeresidences.com/2-bedroom-deluxe-king-queen-suite-with-sofa-bed/
https://skyeresidences.com/2-bedroom-deluxe-queen-suite-with-sofa-bed-accessible/
#Skye Residences Etobicoke, #Skye Residences Near Toronto Airport, #Skye Residences Toronto, #Skye Hotel Toronto, #Skye Hotel Near Toronto Airport, #Hotel Near Toronto Airport, #Near Toronto Airport Accommodation, #Suites Near Toronto Airport, #Etobicoke Suites Near Airport, #Hotel Near Toronto Pearson International Airport, #Toronto Airport Suite Rentals, #Pearson Airport Hotel Suites
Skye Residences | Extended Stay Residences Near Toronto Airport
How to Motivate and Retain Knowledge Workers
1. International Journal of Management Vol. 28 No. 2 June 2011 459
How to Motivate and Retain Knowledge Workers in
Organizations: A Review of the Literature
Karen Carleton
Edmonton, Canada
With the exponential growth of information and the increasingly rapid rate of change,
one of the most valuable resources in organizations today is knowledge workers. These
individuals are pivotal to effective change management and organizational sustainability.
Knowledge workers process, synthesize and generate knowledge in order to problem-
solve and innovate in organizations. Characterized by a high level of education, superior
interpersonal communications skills, and exceptional information processing abilities,
these employees are generally more concerned with adding value to the organization
than earning a high salary. Based on the research, some ways to motivate and retain
knowledge workers include: providing challenging and meaningful work, enabling
learning and career development opportunities, ensuring adequate resources, recognizing
contributions, and creating a supportive environment.
Introduction
Around the world the workforce is rapidly changing, and dynamics are altering how
organizations perceive the acquisition, use and generation of knowledge. Workplaces have
evolved from pre-industrial apprenticeships to large scale, specialized, and segmented
organizations, with defined employee roles and responsibilities (Sauve, 2007). In the
information age, knowledge has become the critical raw material and source for creating
value (O’Driscoll, 2003; Drucker, 1992). Emphasis has shifted away from physical
capital towards human capital. The spotlight is on knowledge workers (KWs), who are
seen as the height of competitive advantage through continuous learning and innovation.
Ironically, the rhetoric of many organizations has long been that ‘people are our most
valued asset’, yet ineffective employee learning investments or supports, poor managerial
practice and unsupportive work environments persist. A new paradigm is needed that
recognizes knowledge workers as valued human assets, not expendable cost centres
(Vora, 2004). Optimizing KW performance is the secret ingredient needed for modern
organizational success.
Today’s organizations must accept that no program or activity continues for long without
eventual redesign or modification to prevent obsolescence (Drucker & Maciariello,
2004). In the information age, workplaces must embrace Senge’s concept of learning
organizations
…where people continually expand their capacity to create the results they truly desire,
where new and expansive patterns of thinking are nurtured, where collective aspiration
is set free, and where people are continually learning how to learn together (Senge,
1990: 3).
Interestingly, varied individual responses to a situation are a distinguishing trait between
KWs. A knowledge worker (KW) can “…understand a body of knowledge and generate
2. 460 International Journal of Management Vol. 28 No. 2 June 2011
new information from that understanding….:” (Kidd, 1994: 186). Drucker (1973) referred
to this primary KW characteristic as a ‘diversity of outputs’ since they are internally
sourced, based on each person’s knowledge, skill set and prior experience. Nevertheless,
a knowledge worker’s thinking changes frequently through his career, based on inputs
and external changes. Although electronic storage and retrieval tools have mushroomed
as companions, they are not heavily relied upon by KWs.
Globalization, the proliferation of technology, workforce diversity, and the knowledge
society have sparked a wave of learning, training and workplace education in
organizations from all sectors. Complex workplace interactions now typically “…require
people to regularly deal with ambiguity and solve problems based on experience or tacit
knowledge” (Sauve, 2007: 1). Additionally, Davenport (2005) found that the fastest-
growing organizations with the highest revenue also performed the most innovative
knowledge work. He cites Microsoft as “…one of the most profitable organizations in
the history of the planet…..Growth industries [like ICT] generally tend to be those with
a high proportion of knowledge workers” (DLS Group Inc, 2007: 6).
Answering the cry for innovation are knowledge workers - the workforce segment
experiencing the most growth across industries (Sauve, 2007). In fact, knowledge workers
are pivotal change agents in organizational development by borrowing, adapting and
producing knowledge for sustainable change management. Attending to KWs’ unique
characteristics, developmental and managerial needs, and retention considerations are of
utmost importance since “….the knowledge work force has become the linchpin to an
organization’s success, as the world morphs into a knowledge economy” (DLS Group
Inc, 2007: 6). Coined by Peter Drucker (1952), the father of modern management, a
KW is valued for the “ability to interpret information within a specific subject area....
through focused analysis, design and/or development. They use research skills to define
problems and to identify alternatives” (Wikipedia, n.d.). Drucker accurately predicted
that major social changes would result from boundless information, making knowledge
workers the largest and (potentially) the most important work group (Clark, 2004;
Davenport et al 2002).
Characteristics
Knowledge workers’ productivity typically peaks between the ages of 35 and 54 (Jamrog,
2004), is characterized by a high level of formal education and skill (Clark, 2004),
matched with effective speaking and writing talents, superior interpersonal capabilities,
and the ability to “shape and direct one’s own work, contribution and career” (Drucker,
1992: 5). Further, the KW’s high investment in education makes them more valuable
than many of their salaries suggest. Yet KWs are empowered by tacit knowledge, and
often do project-style work that necessitates superior soft skills such as interpersonal
communications and negotiating skills. Aided by technology, networking and knowledge
processing capabilities are the lifeblood of knowledge workers. Supports for KWs may
include Communities of Practice (CoP), blogging, conferences, discussion boards, and
instant messaging software. Taken together, KWs are a more educated group, have higher
3. International Journal of Management Vol. 28 No. 2 June 2011 461
expectations, and generally have less tolerance for nonsense than manual workers. As
a result managers need to treat them differently (Nickols, 2000).
Drucker underscored the main difference between knowledge work and manual work:
KWs rarely have prefigured work routines. Rather they must configure a way to address
a situation. Thus, KWs defy conventional supervision and controls. Only the knowledge
worker herself can make her work productive (Nickols, 2000). In any case, organizations
are structured with positions of power and authority, so obtaining compliance means
facilitating individual contributions. Compliance has less relevance in today’s workplace,
than it had in the decades before that were marked by routine manual work (Nickols,
2000).
Managing Knowledge Workers
Managing KWs as valued intellectual assets is critical for capitalizing on and distributing
knowledge in the organization by realizing the KWs’ own initiative (Papacharalambous
& McCalman, 2004: 148). Interestingly, “the most common approach to high-end
knowledge work…can be summarized as ‘hire smart people and leave them alone’”
(Davenport et al, 2002: 26-27). Drucker would disagree, arguing that in managing
the knowledge worker, one must demand responsibility of him/her for organizational
contribution, ensuring the KW also appraises their own contributions. Drucker (1966)
envisions “every knowledge worker in [a] modern organization … is responsible for a
contribution that materially affects the capacity of the organization to perform and to
obtain results” (Clark, 2004). Without such self-assessment, knowledge workers feel
non-achieving, dissatisfied and alienated from their organization (Drucker, 1985).
The supervisory implications are that a KW’s work performance simply cannot be
automated, predicted or micromanaged (Thompson & Heron, 2005). The quality of
humanness is the epitome of knowledge workers because “humanness arises in our
relationships with others through communities”, which are the KW’s source of learning
and knowledge (Plaskoff, in Easterby-Smith & Lyles, 2005: 179). A knowledge worker
must be left to his/her own imagination to breathe meaning into newly synthesized or
retooled knowledge configurations. Managers of KWs need to ensure environmental
conditions optimize knowledge worker performance, so that knowledge sharing happens
naturally (Davenport, 2004; Thompson & Heron, 2005).
Two main principles of knowledge worker management are emphasizing professionalism
and collaboration, and decreasing emphasis on individualized performance metrics and
incentive schemes (DLS Group Inc, 2007). Additionally, focusing on “iterative work
structures” as opposed to sequential, linear ones, allows variety between structured
and unstructured work experiences (DLS Group Inc, 2007; Child & Rodrigues, 2005).
As a result KWs will rise to the occasion, and work towards achieving strategically
aligned organizational objectives, tailoring work accordingly. KW autonomy springs
from defining one’s own work tasks and results. It is advisable that supervisors permit
their KWs to propose their own work plans, projected outcomes, and mutually agree to
deadlines for accountability (Drucker & Maciarello, 2004).
4. 462 International Journal of Management Vol. 28 No. 2 June 2011
Importantly, conventional ‘command and control’ style management is ineffective with
KWs, who have an inherent sense of contribution to organizations, providing they have
fertile environments in which to flourish. By contrast ‘supportive management’ realizes
KW achievement of organizational goals through praise, recognition and resource
provision (Esque, 1999). Such managers empower their KWs to add value by promoting
excellence, and helping facilitate productive work. Symptoms of supportive management
are clear workforce goals and metrics, accurate performance data, and a general sense
of everything being ‘under control’ (Esque, 1999).
Knowledge Work Performance
When knowledge is applied “… to tasks we already know how to do, we call it
‘productivity’. If we apply knowledge to tasks that are new and different, we call it
‘innovation’” (Drucker, 1992: 26). How an organization can reap the most benefit from
KW productivity and innovation, should be on the radar screen of CEOs. In addition to
effective management, other determinants of knowledge worker performance are ICT,
workplace design and other supports. Essentially,
… an organization in a knowledge-based economy and society can excel… by getting
more out of the same kind of people – by managing its knowledge workers for greater
productivity and ‘to make ordinary people do extraordinary things’ (Drucker, 2002 in
DLS Group Inc, 2007).
Recommendations aside, some KW authorities feel that the research findings do not
recognize a clear, singular solution to improving knowledge worker performance since
each KW is unique in their knowledge, skills and experiences (Davenport et al, 2002:
27). Notably, organizational performance consultant, Geary Rummler “…suggests that
the tendency to pigeonhole problems is indicative of bureaucratic organizations” which
fail to adopt a systems approach seeing multiple root causes of KW performance issues,
many of which are environmental (O’Driscoll, 2003: 7). It is naïve to assume that the
organizational environment does not play a significant role in KW performance, and that
the only leverage is through training, to remedy individual ‘deficits’. Rosenberg (1990)
suggests that the big picture of KW development should look at facilitating change on
three levels: work (job), worker (employee), and workplace (organization), since the
three are interdependent (O’Driscoll, 2003).
Knowledge Worker Motivation
Intertwined with knowledge worker management and performance considerations is
the motivation from the valuation of their contributions to the organization. Knowledge
workers must be able to do what they are being paid to do, otherwise their motivation will
invariably deteriorate (Drucker, 1985). With high expectations to produce and contribute
to the organization, knowledge workers are “…more likely to be alienated if not allowed
to achieve” (Drucker, 1985: 117). KWs need challenging, intellectually stimulating and
varied work that adds value to the organization, stemming from supervisory direction
(Jamrog, 2004). Drucker further suggests that managers consult their KWs on what
they can do to aid their performance in terms of resources (time, resources, access to
5. International Journal of Management Vol. 28 No. 2 June 2011 463
information), and also find what hampers their performance. In other words, appropriate
utilization of these intelligent intangibles is central to their productivity. Nonetheless,
managers need to do a “…regular inventory and ranking of the major opportunities” to
find out if their KWs are being effectively used, and what the results of their projects
are (Drucker, 1985; Vora, 2004). Without prioritizing the work of KWs to fit with their
specialized skill set, a firm risks employee disengagement and turnover, in addition to
lost opportunities for using knowledge worker strengths for value-added innovation.
Moreover, unless this is being done, people will be assigned by the demands of the
organization … rather than by their importance and their potential of contribution. In no
time they will be misassigned. They will be where they cannot be productive, no matter
how well motivated, how highly qualified, how dedicated they are (Drucker, 1985: 115).
In other words, if you “pit a good performer against a bad system, the system will win
almost every time” (Rummler and Brache, 1995: 13).
The perception of the employee-employer psychological contract plays a major role in
KW retention and knowledge creation (Thompson & Heron, 2005). Affective commitment
cements a relationship founded on social capital, and results in more innovation when
KWs feel safe sharing their knowledge (Thompson & Heron, 2005). The KW-managerial
relationship is particularly noteworthy, as managers are central to a supportive environment
that allows the KW to flourish. The quality of this relationship, and perceived fairness of
policy and practice application, provides the foundation for employee commitment and
knowledge generation (Thompson & Heron, 2005). A violation of this psychological
contract is seen as an injustice, and fosters negative attitudes and behaviors in KWs,
which diffuses their organizational productivity and motivation.
Of course, only the managers of knowledge workers can help stimulate their productivity,
and conversely, poor management will yield poor performance (Thompson & Heron,
2005). With an unpleasant supervisor or other negative conditions, employees will
look for an alternate workplace that meets their needs, especially if supervisors do not
treat them with respect and dignity (Jamrog, 2004: 8; Esque, 1999). Managers are the
main source of KW motivation, since they are the key to positive reinforcement and
inspiration (Jamrog, 2004; Vora, 2004). Clearly, a manager’s behaviour and attitude
shape the degree of innovation and productivity of a KW. Unfair managers derail the
knowledge worker’s motivation level, which hampers organizational effectiveness,
problem-solving and initiative.
Managing KWs for engagement is a marketing job and means asking, ‘what does the
KW want and need?’, and ‘what does she consider valuable results?’ Interestingly, a cue
for effectively managing KWs can be taken from voluntary organizations, where people
work for satisfaction and challenges, not just a pay cheque (Drucker & Maciarello, 1992).
For instance, non-profit organizations put a lot of thought into designing their mission
statements, typically involving organizational members in the process (Drucker, 1992).
As well, the purpose of work tends to have higher meaning within community-based
agencies, and employees feel rewarded for their contributions, as opposed to feeling like
faceless cogs in a corporate, money-making machine.
6. 464 International Journal of Management Vol. 28 No. 2 June 2011
Work Area and Design
The spatial layout and materials used by KWs often results in a typically messy KW
desk, due to retaining knowledge in a ’holding pattern’ until it has been categorized
(Kidd, 1994). For example, a study of 200 KWs, in four US organizations, revealed that
only 17% of a KW’s time is spent searching and scheduling, while 80% is invested in
interpreting, applying and eliciting knowledge (DLS Group Inc, 2007). Relying more
upon tacit than explicit knowledge, their desks and floors tend to act as repositories for
unsorted information. Regardless, each knowledge worker is unique and is informed
differently, based on their prior experiences (Kidd, 1994). KWs are further marked
by internal change, resulting from mass information processing (Kidd, 1994). Since a
KW’s worldview is constantly reshaped, their mental models are continuously renewed,
enabling a fresh perspective that frees him/her of old paradigms that are no longer useful
(Senge, 1990).
When KWs have a suitable workplace and adequate resources, it has a measurable
effect on the knowledge work they are capable of (Davenport et al, 2002). Effective
physical design of the workplace “…can improve performance by as much as 15 percent”
(Medsker, 2006: 666). Moreover, knowledge work requires focused thinking which
demands the employee’s attention, often limited by an open work space characterized
by distractions, particularly for ‘low screeners’ who have more difficulty blocking
them out (Medsker, 2006). If not minimized, distractions can degrade and delay a
KW’s performance; recovering from interruptions may take fifteen minutes or longer
(Medsker, 2006).
Knowledge Worker Development
Closely linked with KW performance and motivational methods, is development. Firms
in the information age need to become learning organizations (Senge, 1990), and teaching
organizations, each respectively providing aggregate benefit to the organization (Drucker,
1992). Developing and maintaining KWs means ensuring they are at the top of their game,
and ready for innovative problem-solving. For corporate agility to respond to internal
and external change effectively, organizations need to become ‘knowledge-creating
companies’ (Nonaka & Takeuchi, 1991) by developing the capacity to be creative or
innovate regularly (O’Driscoll, 2004: 5).
When an organization invests in optimizing its knowledge workers and facilitates
opportunities for shared learning experiences, benefits flow from enhanced cooperation
and teamwork, allowing competence to blossom (Papacharalambous & McCalman,
2004; Child & Rodrigues, 2005). Yet many organizations today have fallen prey to the
‘training addiction’ and are more a ‘training organization’ than a learning organization.
The former denotes limited and formalized, instructor-led learning events, whereas the
latter embodies various open-ended, multi-sourced, and includes informal or ‘organic’
learning opportunities (O’Driscoll, 2003). Organizationally, learning and development
should be welcomed and integrate formal and informal sources of knowledge.
7. International Journal of Management Vol. 28 No. 2 June 2011 465
Retention of KWs
On organizational minds these days is KW retention, especially with rising skilled
labour shortages. Fostering learning and engagement is important to retaining the best
and the brightest, as opposed to relying heavily on pay and incentive schemes to lure
potential workers away from their current employers. Hence, organizational support for
all employees (including knowledge workers) fosters growth and development, which
lends itself to retention. With the abbreviated employment contract, mobile employees
seek learning and development opportunities that will help them stay current and maintain
their marketability, since long-term commitment for either employees or employers is
now rare (Jamrog, 2004). On-the-job learning and experience therefore needs to be
transferable to other employment opportunities, to be seen as valuable. Nevertheless,
some employers are resistant to sponsor employee learning, rationalizing that ‘it will
only end up benefiting another company’. The truth is such investments usually drive
employee retention; turnover actually begins in the absence of such investments
(O’Driscoll, 2003).
Salary alone is not adequate to retain knowledge workers, who …are not motivated by
and do not stay for money alone. They stay because they are engaged and challenged
by work. (Ramrog, 2004: 11).
More inspiring to the KW is having a stimulating supervisor who can mentor them; and
creating an engaging work environment encouraging retention (Ramrog, 2004). Besides
engagement, ensuring work-life balance is increasingly important to today’s KWs,
many of whom saw their parents accept gold watches or severance pay, after decades
of back-breaking loyalty. Consequently, providing ‘instant gratification’ for a job well
done (rather than promises of future rewards) is highly valued by KWs (Kamrog, 2004).
To summarize, retaining KWs has much to do with setting expectations, motivating, and
developing them (Vora, 2004). A KW’s attitude towards the job and company are related
to learning and development opportunities, engaging in meaningful work, and having
effective supervision (Vora, 2004).
Trends
Communities of Practice (CoP)
More organizations are beginning to appreciate the notion that “…more than 80 percent
of adult learning takes place outside the classroom, and much of it is informal, on-the-job
learning (Sauve, 2007). The impact of socially-situated learning is evident in communities
of practice (CoPs) and mentorship programs to facilitate knowledge sharing. Social
interactions resulting from these solutions distribute context-specific information and
problem-solving practice. CoPs also alter the traditionally top-down information flow,
allowing for multi-faceted dialogue and fluid conversations that invite collegial sharing
(Suave, 2007).
Technology supporting the information-sharing inherent to COPs can include email,
shareware, and virtual meetings; technology innovatively bridges the geographic
distances between KWs (Papacharalambous & McCalman, 2004). Technology-based
8. 466 International Journal of Management Vol. 28 No. 2 June 2011
communities enhance an organization’s collective competence and promote teamwork,
helping to facilitate organizational sustainability.
Retiring KWs
With large scale retirement of KW baby boomers, preserving corporate knowledge is
being cited as crucial to ensuring organizational success. Retiring Knowledge Worker
(RKW) interventions that ease the loss to organizations may mean phased retirement,
mentoring programs, recording case studies and narratives, or creating a knowledge
management platform.
Regardless of KW age or proximity to retirement, only the best tacit knowledge of “...
critical, high performing knowledge workers” is valuable (Seidman & McCauley, 2005:
34). In other words, organizations should only save the knowledge of someone who is a
top performer. Notably, unspoken tacit knowledge is diffusive and embedded in social
interactions, and therefore challenging to accurately capture and apply. Still, RKW
narratives under the guise of ‘naive new person interviews’, and guided coaching can
enliven and diffuse RKW knowledge rather than simply storing it in a database, where
it can quickly become obsolete (Papacharalambous & McCalman, 2004).
Knowledge Hoarding and KW Myth
Regardless of age not all knowledge workers are interested in willingly sharing their
expertise (Papacharalambous & McCalman, 2004). KWs may resist management’s
attempts to capture and distribute their tacit knowledge or hard-earned explicit knowledge
(Child & Rodrigues, 2005). Surrendering tacit assets through externalization, can threaten
a KW’s sense of power and identity in the organization. Employees cannot be forced
to share their knowledge; fostering a cooperative and collaborative work environment
encourages knowledge-sharing (Papacharalambous & McCalman, 2004).
Some organizational learning theorists challenge the use of the seemingly mythical
term ‘knowledge worker’, given that continuous learning is needed at all levels of the
workforce (Esque, 1999). Essentially, they argue that “we’re all knowledge workers
now” since continuous learning is a mandatory part of life and work in the knowledge
age (Thurm as cited in DLS Group Inc, 2007).
Conclusion
In conclusion, a knowledge worker’s organizational advantage is defined by tacit
knowledge, effective information processing, superior soft skills, and creative problem-
solving abilities. Proper management and development of these intangible assets is key
to their optimal performance and retention. KW supports include COPs, technology and
effective workplace design. Knowledge workers, like many others, are less likely to be
loyal over the long-term with the new employment paradigm and a strong labour market
(Child & Rodrigues, 2005). Unless knowledge workers have engaging employment
experiences, career development opportunities and a supportive manager, their
organizations will suffer from costly loss of human capital and potentially devastating
attrition. Never before has the motivation and retention of knowledge workers been more
critical for organizational sustainability than it is today.
9. International Journal of Management Vol. 28 No. 2 June 2011 467
References
Aiman-Smith, L, Bergey, P, Cantwell, A.R., & Doran, M. for Industrial Research Institute,
Inc. (2006, July/August). The coming knowledge and capability shortage, Research-
Technology Management. (49, 4: 15-23).
Child, J. & Rodrigues, S. (2005). Social identity and organizational learning. In
M. Easterby-Smith & M.A. Lyles (Eds). Handbook of Organizational Learning
and Knowledge Management. (2nd ed., 535-536). Victoria, Australia: Blackwell
Publishing.
Clark, D., (2004). Peter Drucker, the Knowledge Worker. Available from http://www.
nwlink.com/~donclark/history_knowledge/drucker.html (Accessed 24 May 2010).
Davenport, T.H., Thomas, RI, & Cantrell, S. (2002, Fall). The mysterious art and science
of knowledge-worker performance. MIT Sloan Management Review. (23-30).
DLS Group Inc Inc. (2007). Session SU302: 10 Ways to Better Blended Learning for
Knowledge Workers. Presented at the ASTD International Conference, Atlanta, GA.
Available from http://74.125.155.132/scholar?q=cache:Ybqj2FlolNIJ:scholar.google.
com/&hl=en&as_sdt=2000 (Accessed 24 May 2010).
Drucker, P.F. and Maciarello, J. (2004). The daily Drucker: 366 Days of insight and
motivation for getting the right things done. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
Drucker, P.F. (1992). Managing for the future: The 1990s and beyond. New York, NY:
Truman Talley Books/Plume.
Drucker, P.F. (1985). Managing the knowledge worker in The changing world of the
executive. New York, NY: Times Books. (112-117.)
Esque, T.J. (1999, January). The myth of the ‘knowledge worker’ Performance
Improvement. (38, 1).
Jamrog, J. (2004). The perfect storm: the future of retention and engagement. Human
Resource Institute, University of Tampa. (2-15). Available from http://www.questia.
com/googleScholar.qst;jsessionid=L7QGM3Qp15Dm0q29xv1HTyWMyv7wLZYfQj
vHTLW2gn2JJTnT11J2!-2078906399!-294124474?docId=5007552251 (Accessed 24
May 2010).
Kidd, A. (1994, April 24-28). The marks on the knowledge worker presented at the Human
Factors in Computing Systems Conference CHI ’94: “Celebrating interdependence”, in
Boston, MS.
Medsker, Karen. (2006). Workplace Design. In J.A. Pershing, (Ed.). Handbook of Human
Performance Technology (3rd ed., 665-691). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
Nikols, F. (1999). Human Performance Technology: The end of an era. FORUM section,
Human Resources Development Quarterly (1990). Available from http://www.nickols.
us/end_of_era.htm (Accessed 24 May 2010).
O’Driscoll, T. (2003, April). Improving knowledge worker performance. Performance
Improvement. (42, 4: 5-11).
10. 468 International Journal of Management Vol. 28 No. 2 June 2011
Papacharalambous, L. & McCalman, J. (2004, July). Teams investing their knowledge
shares in the stock market of virtuality: a gain or a loss? in New Technology, Work and
Employment. (19, 2: 154-164).
Plaskoff, J. (2005). Intersubjectivity and community-building: Learning to learn
organizationally in M. Easterby-Smith & M.A. Lyles (Eds). Handbook of Organizational
Learning and Knowledge Management. (2nd ed.,161-184). Victoria, Australia: Blackwell
Publishing.
Rummler, G. A., & Brache, A. P. (1995). Improving performance: How to manage
the white space on the organization chart (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Publishers.
Sauve, E. (2007, March). Informal Knowledge Transfer. T+D magazine. Available
from http://www.astd.org/TD/Archives/2007/March/Mar2007.htm (Accessed 24 May
2010).
Seidman, W. & McCauley, M. (2005, September). Saving retiring knowledge workers’
secret sauce”. Performance Improvement. (44, 8: 34-38).
Senge, P.M. (1990). The Fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization.
New York: Doubleday.
Thompson, M. & Heron, P. (2005). The difference a manager can make: organizational
justice and knowledge worker commitment. International Journal of Human Resource
Management. (16, 3: 383-404).
Thurm, S. (2006, January 23). Companies struggle to pass on workers’ knowledge. Wall
Street Journal. (B1).
Vora, M.K. (2004, July-August). Creating employee value in a global economy through
participation, motivation and development. Total Quality Management. (15, 5/6: 794-
806).
Wikipedia (Knowledge Worker search). Available at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Knowledge_worker (Accessed 24 May 2010).
Contact email address: karencarleton@theedge.ca
11. Copyright of International Journal of Management is the property of International Journal of Management and
its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's
express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.