"Hierarchies of Evidence" is an important but problematic concept for medical professionals to understand as it underpins their capacity to be effective practitioners and researchers.
Study designs, Epidemiological study design, Types of studiesDr Lipilekha Patnaik
Study design, Epidemiological study designA study design is a specific plan or protocol
for conducting the study, which allows the investigator to translate the conceptual hypothesis into an operational one.
This presentation was funded by CDC and PEPFAR through the SUCCEED project at Stellenbosch University. The presentation was delivered by Ms Lynn Hendricks from the Centre for Evidence Based Health Care in July 2017
Study designs, Epidemiological study design, Types of studiesDr Lipilekha Patnaik
Study design, Epidemiological study designA study design is a specific plan or protocol
for conducting the study, which allows the investigator to translate the conceptual hypothesis into an operational one.
This presentation was funded by CDC and PEPFAR through the SUCCEED project at Stellenbosch University. The presentation was delivered by Ms Lynn Hendricks from the Centre for Evidence Based Health Care in July 2017
Introduce IUON students to evidence-based nursing literature and effective strategies for searching for and accessing evidence-based research in nursing.
Janet Schnall's presentation about Evidence Based Nursing Resources at our free monthly webcast. Recording available at https://webmeeting.nih.gov/p96958659/
Methods Pyramids as an Organizing Structure for Evidence-Based Medicine--SIGC...jodischneider
Keynote talk 2020-08-01 for the JCDL Workshop on Conceptual Models: https://sig-cm.github.io/news/JCDL-2020-CFP/
Discussion points:
* Methods are a key part of the Knowledge Organizing Structure for Evidence-Based Medicine.
* Methods relate to how we GENERATE evidence.
* Different methods generate evidence of different kinds and strength.
* I believe Methods can be useful in mining claims and arguments from papers: methods AUTHORIZE claims.
* More specialized hierarchies of evidence can be found in medicine
* Various groups are complicating the “evidence pyramid” hierarchy of evidence.
PHAR1101: Broadening Search in OneSearchLucia Ravi
This presentation aims to support PHAR1101 students in searching for general resources about their Drug Pioneer within the UWA Library OneSearch catalogue.
PsychINFO database searching, gender dysphoria 2017Lucia Ravi
A basic introduction to constructing a simple search within the the PsycINFO Database on the Ovid platform. Sample search on "Gender Dysphoria" as a topic created for the IMED1108, Sem2, 2017.
HealthMed Complete database searching, female fetus 2017Lucia Ravi
A basic introduction to constructing a simple search within the Health and Medical Complete Database. Sample search on "Female fetus" as a topic created for the IMED1108, Sem2, 2017.
Scopus database searching, topic or author search Aug2017Lucia Ravi
A short introduction to Scopus - one of the specialist citation tracking database provided through the UWA Library. Provides tips for constructing a topic and author search in Scopus and running some of the analysis reporting features availalbe.
This presentation will introduce you to the basics of starting a search in UWA's OneSearch catalogue.
It was created by the UWA Library to support student's researching for their IMED1108 assessment.
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN HEALTHCARE.pdfAnujkumaranit
Artificial intelligence (AI) refers to the simulation of human intelligence processes by machines, especially computer systems. It encompasses tasks such as learning, reasoning, problem-solving, perception, and language understanding. AI technologies are revolutionizing various fields, from healthcare to finance, by enabling machines to perform tasks that typically require human intelligence.
- Video recording of this lecture in English language: https://youtu.be/lK81BzxMqdo
- Video recording of this lecture in Arabic language: https://youtu.be/Ve4P0COk9OI
- Link to download the book free: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/nephrotube-nephrology-books.html
- Link to NephroTube website: www.NephroTube.com
- Link to NephroTube social media accounts: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/join-nephrotube-on-social-media.html
Title: Sense of Smell
Presenter: Dr. Faiza, Assistant Professor of Physiology
Qualifications:
MBBS (Best Graduate, AIMC Lahore)
FCPS Physiology
ICMT, CHPE, DHPE (STMU)
MPH (GC University, Faisalabad)
MBA (Virtual University of Pakistan)
Learning Objectives:
Describe the primary categories of smells and the concept of odor blindness.
Explain the structure and location of the olfactory membrane and mucosa, including the types and roles of cells involved in olfaction.
Describe the pathway and mechanisms of olfactory signal transmission from the olfactory receptors to the brain.
Illustrate the biochemical cascade triggered by odorant binding to olfactory receptors, including the role of G-proteins and second messengers in generating an action potential.
Identify different types of olfactory disorders such as anosmia, hyposmia, hyperosmia, and dysosmia, including their potential causes.
Key Topics:
Olfactory Genes:
3% of the human genome accounts for olfactory genes.
400 genes for odorant receptors.
Olfactory Membrane:
Located in the superior part of the nasal cavity.
Medially: Folds downward along the superior septum.
Laterally: Folds over the superior turbinate and upper surface of the middle turbinate.
Total surface area: 5-10 square centimeters.
Olfactory Mucosa:
Olfactory Cells: Bipolar nerve cells derived from the CNS (100 million), with 4-25 olfactory cilia per cell.
Sustentacular Cells: Produce mucus and maintain ionic and molecular environment.
Basal Cells: Replace worn-out olfactory cells with an average lifespan of 1-2 months.
Bowman’s Gland: Secretes mucus.
Stimulation of Olfactory Cells:
Odorant dissolves in mucus and attaches to receptors on olfactory cilia.
Involves a cascade effect through G-proteins and second messengers, leading to depolarization and action potential generation in the olfactory nerve.
Quality of a Good Odorant:
Small (3-20 Carbon atoms), volatile, water-soluble, and lipid-soluble.
Facilitated by odorant-binding proteins in mucus.
Membrane Potential and Action Potential:
Resting membrane potential: -55mV.
Action potential frequency in the olfactory nerve increases with odorant strength.
Adaptation Towards the Sense of Smell:
Rapid adaptation within the first second, with further slow adaptation.
Psychological adaptation greater than receptor adaptation, involving feedback inhibition from the central nervous system.
Primary Sensations of Smell:
Camphoraceous, Musky, Floral, Pepperminty, Ethereal, Pungent, Putrid.
Odor Detection Threshold:
Examples: Hydrogen sulfide (0.0005 ppm), Methyl-mercaptan (0.002 ppm).
Some toxic substances are odorless at lethal concentrations.
Characteristics of Smell:
Odor blindness for single substances due to lack of appropriate receptor protein.
Behavioral and emotional influences of smell.
Transmission of Olfactory Signals:
From olfactory cells to glomeruli in the olfactory bulb, involving lateral inhibition.
Primitive, less old, and new olfactory systems with different path
Explore natural remedies for syphilis treatment in Singapore. Discover alternative therapies, herbal remedies, and lifestyle changes that may complement conventional treatments. Learn about holistic approaches to managing syphilis symptoms and supporting overall health.
These lecture slides, by Dr Sidra Arshad, offer a quick overview of physiological basis of a normal electrocardiogram.
Learning objectives:
1. Define an electrocardiogram (ECG) and electrocardiography
2. Describe how dipoles generated by the heart produce the waveforms of the ECG
3. Describe the components of a normal electrocardiogram of a typical bipolar leads (limb II)
4. Differentiate between intervals and segments
5. Enlist some common indications for obtaining an ECG
Study Resources:
1. Chapter 11, Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology, 14th edition
2. Chapter 9, Human Physiology - From Cells to Systems, Lauralee Sherwood, 9th edition
3. Chapter 29, Ganong’s Review of Medical Physiology, 26th edition
4. Electrocardiogram, StatPearls - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK549803/
5. ECG in Medical Practice by ABM Abdullah, 4th edition
6. ECG Basics, http://www.nataliescasebook.com/tag/e-c-g-basics
Report Back from SGO 2024: What’s the Latest in Cervical Cancer?bkling
Are you curious about what’s new in cervical cancer research or unsure what the findings mean? Join Dr. Emily Ko, a gynecologic oncologist at Penn Medicine, to learn about the latest updates from the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) 2024 Annual Meeting on Women’s Cancer. Dr. Ko will discuss what the research presented at the conference means for you and answer your questions about the new developments.
Tom Selleck Health: A Comprehensive Look at the Iconic Actor’s Wellness Journeygreendigital
Tom Selleck, an enduring figure in Hollywood. has captivated audiences for decades with his rugged charm, iconic moustache. and memorable roles in television and film. From his breakout role as Thomas Magnum in Magnum P.I. to his current portrayal of Frank Reagan in Blue Bloods. Selleck's career has spanned over 50 years. But beyond his professional achievements. fans have often been curious about Tom Selleck Health. especially as he has aged in the public eye.
Follow us on: Pinterest
Introduction
Many have been interested in Tom Selleck health. not only because of his enduring presence on screen but also because of the challenges. and lifestyle choices he has faced and made over the years. This article delves into the various aspects of Tom Selleck health. exploring his fitness regimen, diet, mental health. and the challenges he has encountered as he ages. We'll look at how he maintains his well-being. the health issues he has faced, and his approach to ageing .
Early Life and Career
Childhood and Athletic Beginnings
Tom Selleck was born on January 29, 1945, in Detroit, Michigan, and grew up in Sherman Oaks, California. From an early age, he was involved in sports, particularly basketball. which played a significant role in his physical development. His athletic pursuits continued into college. where he attended the University of Southern California (USC) on a basketball scholarship. This early involvement in sports laid a strong foundation for his physical health and disciplined lifestyle.
Transition to Acting
Selleck's transition from an athlete to an actor came with its physical demands. His first significant role in "Magnum P.I." required him to perform various stunts and maintain a fit appearance. This role, which he played from 1980 to 1988. necessitated a rigorous fitness routine to meet the show's demands. setting the stage for his long-term commitment to health and wellness.
Fitness Regimen
Workout Routine
Tom Selleck health and fitness regimen has evolved. adapting to his changing roles and age. During his "Magnum, P.I." days. Selleck's workouts were intense and focused on building and maintaining muscle mass. His routine included weightlifting, cardiovascular exercises. and specific training for the stunts he performed on the show.
Selleck adjusted his fitness routine as he aged to suit his body's needs. Today, his workouts focus on maintaining flexibility, strength, and cardiovascular health. He incorporates low-impact exercises such as swimming, walking, and light weightlifting. This balanced approach helps him stay fit without putting undue strain on his joints and muscles.
Importance of Flexibility and Mobility
In recent years, Selleck has emphasized the importance of flexibility and mobility in his fitness regimen. Understanding the natural decline in muscle mass and joint flexibility with age. he includes stretching and yoga in his routine. These practices help prevent injuries, improve posture, and maintain mobilit
Pulmonary Thromboembolism - etilogy, types, medical- Surgical and nursing man...VarunMahajani
Disruption of blood supply to lung alveoli due to blockage of one or more pulmonary blood vessels is called as Pulmonary thromboembolism. In this presentation we will discuss its causes, types and its management in depth.
2. The term levels of evidence refers to what degree that
information can be trusted. 1
Traditionally, in scientific research, some (study) methods
have been considered to be ‘better’ than others, or at least
more useful for evidence based decision making. 2
Systematic reviews have increasingly replaced traditional
narrative reviews and expert commentaries as a way of
summarising the research evidence. 3
1
Buckingham JB Greenhalgh T. Searching the literature. In: Greenhalgh T.
How to read a paper: the basics of evidence-based medicine.5th
ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2014.
2
MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow. Are some types of evidence better than others; IN:
Understanding Health Research, A tool for making sense of Health Studies
3
Davies, HT, Crombie, IK. What is a Systematic Review. In: What is….? Series. London: Hayward Medical Communications; 2009
Levels of Evidence
6. Key Players: Australia
JBI Connect
Produce systematic reviews and
best practice guidelines.
http://joannabriggs.org/research/critical-appraisal-tools.html
9. Evidence-based guidelines
& summaries
• Developed by synthesising the highest level of
evidence available on treatment choices
• Guidelines provide recommendations
supported by that evidence
• May take into account resources and practices
relevant to the organisation
• Concise and clinically relevant
10. Where do I find evidence?
• MEDLINE/Pubmed
and Embase
• Cochrane/JBI
Connect
• TRIP/OvidMD
• BMJ Best Practice
• ClinicalKey
• UpToDate
• ETG Complete
See: Resources for Answering Clinical Questions
11. Developed by US National Library of Medicine (NLM)
this life sciences and biomedicine database uses
specialist Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) to index
highly reputed medical journals.
Ability to map to MeSH search terms and to build up
your search strategy with inbuilt Boolean operators.
A range of ways to refine and limit search results based
on types of studies, cohort study groups and more.
MeSH topics and sub-topics provide a range of ways to
focus in on very specific medical areas of research.
12. Medline or PubMed?
• MedLine are all those items that have been
selected for inclusion and indexed using MeSH
terms. Greater control over search strategy in the
Ovid interface.
(24 million references)
• Now includes in process, ahead of print, non-indexed
• PubMed is free, includes all Medline records, is
slightly larger as includes out of scope items.
(27 million references)
See http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/dif_med_pub.html for a summary of the differences.
13. Developed by Elsevier, Embase aims to provide the
widest possible coverage of biomedical literature
incorporating many conferences and journal titles
not covered by MEDLINE.
Ability to map to Emtree search index providing a
comprehensive vocabulary to describe biomedical data.
Use of Ovid interface to build up your search strategy
with inbuilt Boolean operators.
A range of ways to refine and limit search results based
on types of studies, cohort study groups and more.
University Library
14. AND
OR: to join similar terms together
AND: to join unique concept
Endometriosis
(MeSH /)
OR
Endometriosis
(Keyword .mp)
“Pelvic pain”
(MeSH or keyword)
OR
Pelvic AND pain
(MeSH or keyword)
Simple Boolean
Logic
There is so much medical literature published you need to know how it is organised and the quickest way to find the information you need.
In Medical research it is particularly important to you are familiar with notions of evidenced based practice – that you base your practice decisions on the most up to date and high quality research on the population focus group you are working with in order to determine the best treatment.
Click link to OneSearch record of this eBook (will need Pheme credentials to read it), also shows the Multiple Versions feature.
Show contents and discuss briefly use of ebook platforms and of bookshelf.
Look at contents.. Focus particularly on break down of how to assess different papers that evaluate particular studies and in particular systematic reviews and guidelines.
Ask if students are familiar systematic reviews and Evidence based guidelines (hands up) and then to discuss some of the differences between them? Ask for feedback on these?
Greenhalgh, Trisha. 2014. How to read a paper: the basics of evidence-based medicine. BMJ Books: Hoboken.)
“The term ‘level of evidence’ refers to what degree that information can be trusted based on study design”. (Greenhalgh 2014)
As you can see from this pyramid the higher the corroboration of different types of evidence, the higher it is on the hierarchy.
You will come across many different forms of the hierarchy as it is continually being contested and evolving – so you will have to get used to interpreting it at a critical level.
This is the pyramid at its most basic level.. With single studies being considered the least reliable, moving to systematic reviews that undertake a robust review of studies undertaken on specific interventions, through to evidence based guidelines.. (however need to question if these latter do belong at the top of the hierarchy – in trying to provide an overview of current best practice of a condition as a whole)
We don’t have access to decision support systems at this time. They are systems that directly link to patient records.
Do have a EBM Lib Guide that provides links to the resources we offer to support EBM.
The bottom layer of the main hierarchy – single studies – has its own hierarchy depending on the original type of study performed.
This is where – if you are doing your own literature search or systematic review of treatment/disease research for a specific cohort – you would need to critically assess the research/studies/case focus for their research vigour and relevance to your area of health and cohort.
For single studies RCT are considered the most robust and unbiased and they are often the focus on systematic reviews.
Here is a new revised pyramid, (Developed by Dr Murad and his team at the Evidence Based Practice Centre, Mayo Clinic in Rochester USA.)
to take into account the need to think critically about the design and development of individual studies – replacing a straight line with a wavy one to indicate that some research lower down the hierarchy may actually be better if designed better than RCTs. The separation of systematic reviews from the pyramid emphasises that they themselves are a filter through which evidence is viewed and also subject to critical review in their overall design and development
The proposed new evidence-based medicine pyramid. (A) The traditional pyramid. (B) Revising the pyramid: (1) lines separating the study designs become wavy (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation), (2) systematic reviews are ‘chopped off’ the pyramid. (C) The revised pyramid: systematic reviews are a lens through which evidence is viewed (applied).
One consideration in the evaluation of evidence is who has produced it and how good their methodology is. One of the key highly reputed players in Australia is The Joanna Briggs Institute who collaborate with Australian and international research institutes to produce systematic reviews and from these best practice guidelines available through their library JBI Connect.
They also produce methodology guides and software to support critical appraisal. This link is a good one for quick checklists on how to appraise different types of studies as well as systematic reviews.
Middle level: Systematic Reviews.
Systematic reviews analyse and appraise primary studies on the same question.
This is a simplified version of the process. (There are UWA as a well as a number of resources for this)
The final report will include their search strategies, keywords, subject headings. It is good to look at this to enhance your own learning.
Finding a systematic review on a topic can save you a lot of time.
A well structured systematic review will include the databases searched, search strategies used and a detailed analysis of studies included in the review – their quality and strengths.
One of the most robust and trusted producers of systematic reviews is Cochrane Collaboration.
The Cochrane Reviews (like JBI) also work in collaboration with International research bodies to produce systematic reviews and have a number of specialist resource databases such as their SR Database and database of Randomised control trials.
Like JBI they also produce and collate methodology reviews and critical appraisal of research tools which have been collated into a number of Handbooks.
This link is a good one for quick checklists on how to appraise different types of studies as well as systematic reviews.
The top levels
This section of the literature will become important later in your course when you begin clinical practice.
Can you trust the synthesis of the evidence that has been completed – who has been involved in it, how recent?
Is it comprehensive and based on appraised high level studies and systematic reviews or in providing a comprehensive overview of current best practice is it compromised.
http://ebm.bmj.com/content/21/4/121.full
Pyramids are Guides not rules: the evolution of the evidence pyramid.
These are the key databases where you can find studies and systematic reviews on dentistry related topics.
See our guide for access to them: Resources for Answering Clinical Questions: http://guides.is.uwa.edu.au/ACQresources?hs=a
Go to this site and
And Dentistry – EBM tab http://guides.is.uwa.edu.au/c.php?g=324873&p=2177834
We will be looking at some of these in more detail in the upcoming workshop.
Take a bit of stretch and break now or have a look at the websites of the Joanna Briggs Institute or Cochrane Collaboration or our LibGuide link here.
MEDLINE® contains journal citations and abstracts for biomedical literature from around the world. PubMed® provides free access to MEDLINE and links to full text articles when possible
Medline (1960) represents a much more highly selected range of medical journals as selected by the US National Library of Medicine which have been catalogued using MeSH – Medical subject headings. 5600 scholarly journals.
PubMed (1996) as well as Medline contains in process and ahead of print citations, out of scope articles (from within Medline journals), some full-text OA journals, Book citations from NCBI
PubMed Central (2000) for open access only journal publications – some also in Medline.
As such you will get more results in Pubmed but unlikely to be as relevant to biomedical science as those just in MedLine. Pubmed is easier to search.
MeSH 27,883 description and over 87,000 entry terms.
232,000 supplementary records ( specific chemicals, diseases and drug protocols).
MeSH – a thirteen level hierarchy of medical terms (27,883 descriptors + 87,000 entry terms) Medical Subject Terms
Includes Supplementary Concept Records (SRC)– contain specific examples of chemicals, diseases and drug protocols.
HM – Heading map field, used to identify the most specific descriptor class (SRC’s are related to descriptors in the HM)
Perhaps change image to Venn diagram.
. (you might have used a different one in the past) which is much simpler to use.
Strong biomedical focus – evidence based medicine, drug and medical device efficacy studies
https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/embase-biomedical-research
Europena focus.
32+ million records from 8,300 published journals. (6+ million records and 2900+ journals not covered by medline)
EmTree: 70,000 + preferred terms (30,000 for drugs and chemicals), 290,000 synonyms (2/3rds drugs and chemicals)
Medical devices and related medical procedures (includes MeSH terms)