HCL facing challenge in the
laptop market

By
Aditya Chaturvedi
Nikita Baheti
Nikita Sapra
Priyanka Dwivedi
Teena Bansal
Shradha Sethi
Varun Kumar
Market research includes:
• Identify research
• Literature research
• Research methodology
i.
Research design
ii.
Sampling
iii.
Data collection method
• Data analysis
• Findings
Defining research
How to consolidate their position in the laptop space and
to build its laptop sales in 2010-11 to survive the major
structural changes that were taking place in the rapidly
growing Indian computer marketplace
Literature research
• HCL’s business in desktop market
• Consumer behavior
• Marketing strategies of hcl
Research methodology
• Research design:

Exploratory research and qualitative research used Since
there is no specific course of action. The objective of this
research is to analyze the market for the popularity of
HCL laptops
Sampling
• Probability sampling is used
Sample size :100
Stratified samples are taken
Two samples made one of retailers and another of
customers of sample size 50
Data collection method
Types of data being collected
Primary data through structured questionnaire
Secondary data through company and internal
reports,government records like
IMRB,VIKALPA,Advertising agencies
Data collection techniques
•
•
•
•

Observations
Interviews
Documents and reports
Audio visual materials
Data analysis
• Percentage of customers
using particular brand of
laptop
Sales

Reasons for low popularity

OTHERS
15%

SONY VAIO
8%

HP
29%

LENEVO
13%
DELL
24%
HCL ME
11%

• Limited portfolio
• old-fashioned practices,
• problems of spending on
marketing and communication
compared to its multinational
rivals
Reasons to choose particular brand
Analysis

• People gives more preference
to good service when buying
laptops
• Faster delivery is a low-cost
(for HCL) but high-value (for
consumer) proposition.

• HCL can offer over Dell is a
quicker delivery time of the
finished product using local
manufacturer
Percentage showing most popular brand
• HCL, being a company with
strong functional credibility, is
quite unsuccessful in the
laptop category, because each
and every competitor is
constantly trying to compete

• The company cannot reap
expected profits out of its
strong market position as the
category is highly
commoditized
Percentage showing better after sales service
• Laptops are purchased more
on brand image, style, and
entertainment than mere
functionalities and durability
• If HCL can assure the delivery
in a week or ten days against
Dell’s three to four weeks lead
time, this will definitely
become a strong decision
making criteria in favour of
HCL.
• To fight with the prominent
player, Dell, HCL needs to play
in the platform of Service
Differentiation
Observations
• Dell, in spite of doubling its ad spend and higher
saliency of ad spends, lost market share in 2009.
• Lenovo, in spite of reduced ad spends, gained
1.3 per cent share
• Laptops have a better acceptance and are
growing faster in the metros
• HCL is struggling on ROM and the multiplier
and is certainly not among the front-runners
Findings
• HCL is growing at a healthy rate in the laptop
segment but has not been able to leverage the
network for laptops.

• MNC brands like HP and dell have a wider range
in the valuefor-money entry-level laptops with
more variants, as well as being perceived better
on quality
• Both Acer and Dell have a wide product portfolio
in the entry-level segment
Recommendations
• It is apparent from the Case that the future scope for laptops
lies in the top 4 cities (which grew by 73%) followed by the
rest of India (48%); hence HCL should focus primarily on
these geographies.
• HCL should use its strong desktop distribution infrastructure
to increase its laptop distribution width in traditional channels
• It needs to consistently appeal to the youth with new design
variants so as to build a strong pull
• HCL needs to make sharp choices between investing in
R&D, design, product portfolio, innovation
Hcl market & business research for laptop catogory

Hcl market & business research for laptop catogory

  • 1.
    HCL facing challengein the laptop market By Aditya Chaturvedi Nikita Baheti Nikita Sapra Priyanka Dwivedi Teena Bansal Shradha Sethi Varun Kumar
  • 2.
    Market research includes: •Identify research • Literature research • Research methodology i. Research design ii. Sampling iii. Data collection method • Data analysis • Findings
  • 3.
    Defining research How toconsolidate their position in the laptop space and to build its laptop sales in 2010-11 to survive the major structural changes that were taking place in the rapidly growing Indian computer marketplace
  • 4.
    Literature research • HCL’sbusiness in desktop market • Consumer behavior • Marketing strategies of hcl
  • 5.
    Research methodology • Researchdesign: Exploratory research and qualitative research used Since there is no specific course of action. The objective of this research is to analyze the market for the popularity of HCL laptops
  • 6.
    Sampling • Probability samplingis used Sample size :100 Stratified samples are taken Two samples made one of retailers and another of customers of sample size 50
  • 7.
    Data collection method Typesof data being collected Primary data through structured questionnaire Secondary data through company and internal reports,government records like IMRB,VIKALPA,Advertising agencies
  • 8.
  • 9.
    Data analysis • Percentageof customers using particular brand of laptop Sales Reasons for low popularity OTHERS 15% SONY VAIO 8% HP 29% LENEVO 13% DELL 24% HCL ME 11% • Limited portfolio • old-fashioned practices, • problems of spending on marketing and communication compared to its multinational rivals
  • 10.
    Reasons to chooseparticular brand Analysis • People gives more preference to good service when buying laptops • Faster delivery is a low-cost (for HCL) but high-value (for consumer) proposition. • HCL can offer over Dell is a quicker delivery time of the finished product using local manufacturer
  • 11.
    Percentage showing mostpopular brand • HCL, being a company with strong functional credibility, is quite unsuccessful in the laptop category, because each and every competitor is constantly trying to compete • The company cannot reap expected profits out of its strong market position as the category is highly commoditized
  • 12.
    Percentage showing betterafter sales service • Laptops are purchased more on brand image, style, and entertainment than mere functionalities and durability • If HCL can assure the delivery in a week or ten days against Dell’s three to four weeks lead time, this will definitely become a strong decision making criteria in favour of HCL. • To fight with the prominent player, Dell, HCL needs to play in the platform of Service Differentiation
  • 13.
    Observations • Dell, inspite of doubling its ad spend and higher saliency of ad spends, lost market share in 2009. • Lenovo, in spite of reduced ad spends, gained 1.3 per cent share • Laptops have a better acceptance and are growing faster in the metros • HCL is struggling on ROM and the multiplier and is certainly not among the front-runners
  • 14.
    Findings • HCL isgrowing at a healthy rate in the laptop segment but has not been able to leverage the network for laptops. • MNC brands like HP and dell have a wider range in the valuefor-money entry-level laptops with more variants, as well as being perceived better on quality • Both Acer and Dell have a wide product portfolio in the entry-level segment
  • 15.
    Recommendations • It isapparent from the Case that the future scope for laptops lies in the top 4 cities (which grew by 73%) followed by the rest of India (48%); hence HCL should focus primarily on these geographies. • HCL should use its strong desktop distribution infrastructure to increase its laptop distribution width in traditional channels • It needs to consistently appeal to the youth with new design variants so as to build a strong pull • HCL needs to make sharp choices between investing in R&D, design, product portfolio, innovation