DSM - Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders,
It is the handbook used by health care professionals as an authoritative guide to the diagnosis of mental disorders.
The DSM-5: Overview of Main Themes and Diagnostic RevisionsJames Tobin, Ph.D.
DSM-5 represents the field’s most recent attempt at revising the DSM-IV-TR diagnostic nomenclature. In this presentation, I will outline the primary efforts of the DSM-5 Task Force and the major diagnostic changes that were incorporated in the new manual, with an emphasis on the disorders of adulthood. The most promising changes are the organization of mental illness as a spectrum, the addition of dimensionality to specifier descriptions, lifespan/development and cultural refinements, and the articulation of a new hybrid model of mental illness. In the context of these gains, I also will provide a summary of the major controversies surrounding the DSM-5, including misgivings about lower thresholds to qualify for numerous diagnoses and the related concern that we may now run the risk of pathologizing “normal” human functioning.
DSM - Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders,
It is the handbook used by health care professionals as an authoritative guide to the diagnosis of mental disorders.
The DSM-5: Overview of Main Themes and Diagnostic RevisionsJames Tobin, Ph.D.
DSM-5 represents the field’s most recent attempt at revising the DSM-IV-TR diagnostic nomenclature. In this presentation, I will outline the primary efforts of the DSM-5 Task Force and the major diagnostic changes that were incorporated in the new manual, with an emphasis on the disorders of adulthood. The most promising changes are the organization of mental illness as a spectrum, the addition of dimensionality to specifier descriptions, lifespan/development and cultural refinements, and the articulation of a new hybrid model of mental illness. In the context of these gains, I also will provide a summary of the major controversies surrounding the DSM-5, including misgivings about lower thresholds to qualify for numerous diagnoses and the related concern that we may now run the risk of pathologizing “normal” human functioning.
From DSM-IV-TR to DSM-5: Analysis of some changesCristina Senín
The publication of the fifth edition of the DSM has intensified a debate begun some
time agowith the announcement of the changes in diagnostic criteria proposed by the APA. This
article analyzes some of these modifications. Some interesting points where it is right, such as
the inclusion of dimensionality in both diagnostic classes and in some disorders, the inclusion of
an obsessive-compulsive spectrum, and the disappearance of subtypes of schizophrenia. It also
analyzes other more controversial points, such as the consideration of the attenuated psychosis
syndrome, the description of a persistent depressive disorder, reorganization of the classic
somatoform disorders as somatic symptom disorders, or maintenance of three large clusters of
personality disorders, always unsatisfactory, along with an announced, but marginal, suggestion
of the dimensional perspective of personality impairments. The new DSM-5 classification opens
many questions about the diagnostic validity which it attempts to improve, this time taking an
approach nearer to neurology and genetics than to clinical psychology.
Core slides from my presentation about the new DSM diagnostic system. The full presentation has more zing but I removed some to streamline and to whet the appetite.
Identify the distinction of DSM 5 vs ICD.
Explain the significant change in the fifth edition .
Discuss and differentiate the purposes of mental illness classification.
From DSM-IV-TR to DSM-5: Analysis of some changesCristina Senín
The publication of the fifth edition of the DSM has intensified a debate begun some
time agowith the announcement of the changes in diagnostic criteria proposed by the APA. This
article analyzes some of these modifications. Some interesting points where it is right, such as
the inclusion of dimensionality in both diagnostic classes and in some disorders, the inclusion of
an obsessive-compulsive spectrum, and the disappearance of subtypes of schizophrenia. It also
analyzes other more controversial points, such as the consideration of the attenuated psychosis
syndrome, the description of a persistent depressive disorder, reorganization of the classic
somatoform disorders as somatic symptom disorders, or maintenance of three large clusters of
personality disorders, always unsatisfactory, along with an announced, but marginal, suggestion
of the dimensional perspective of personality impairments. The new DSM-5 classification opens
many questions about the diagnostic validity which it attempts to improve, this time taking an
approach nearer to neurology and genetics than to clinical psychology.
Core slides from my presentation about the new DSM diagnostic system. The full presentation has more zing but I removed some to streamline and to whet the appetite.
Identify the distinction of DSM 5 vs ICD.
Explain the significant change in the fifth edition .
Discuss and differentiate the purposes of mental illness classification.
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)Hemangi Narvekar
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), published by the American Psychiatric Association (APA), offers a common language and standard criteria for the classification of mental disorders.
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, mosyrettcc
The Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual of Mental Disorders,
Fifth Edition (DSM-5)
Cardwell C. Nuckols, PhD
[email protected]
www.cnuckols.com
mailto:[email protected]�
HISTORY OF THE DSM
• 1840 1 Dx – U.S. Census – Idiocy/Insanity
– Also in the 1840s, southern alienists discovered a
malady called Drapetomania - the inexplicable, mad
longing of a slave for freedom.
• 1880 7 Dx’s – U.S. Census
– Mania – mostly as defined today, a condition
characterized by severely elevated mood.
– Melancholia – would be noted as depression today.
– Monomania - Pathological obsession with a single
subject or idea. Excessive concentration of interest
upon one particular subject or idea. The difference
between monomania and passion can be very subtle
and difficult to recognize.
– Paresis – general or partial paralysis. (This would not
be the last time that a physical affliction crept into
the psychological arena; among the disorders
described in the DSM-IV –TR is snoring, or Breathing
Related Sleep Disorder 780.59, pp. 615-622).
– Dementia – as described today as characterized by
multiple cognitive deficits that include impairment
in memory (most common Alzheimer's).
– Dipsomania - An insatiable craving for alcoholic
beverages.
– Epilepsy
HISTORY OF THE DSM
• 1940 – 26 Dx's (ICD-6; WHO)
– Which took its nomenclature from the US Army and
Veterans Administration nomenclature. The WHO system
included 10 categories for psychoses, 9 for
psychoneuroses, and 7 for disorders of character,
behavior, and intelligence)
• 1952 DSM – 106 Dx’s
– DSM-I included 3 categories of psychopathology: organic
brain syndromes, functional disorders, and mental
deficiency. These categories contained 106
diagnoses. Only one diagnosis, Adjustment Reaction of
Childhood/Adolescence, could be applied to children.
• 1968 DSM-II – 185 Dx’s (revised DSM-II, 1974)
– It had 11 major diagnostic categories. Increased attention
was given to the problems of children and adolescence
with the categorical addition of Behavior Disorders of
Childhood-Adolescence.
– This category included Hyperkinetic Reaction,
Withdrawing Reaction, Overanxious Reaction, Runaway
Reaction, Unsocialized Aggressive Reaction, and Group
Delinquent Reaction.
HISTORY OF THE DSM
Up until December 26, 1974 Homosexuality was considered a form of
deviant behavior and was a psychiatric condition.
HISTORY OF THE DSM
• 1980 DSM-III – 265 Dx’s (roughly coincided with
ICD-9, but differed from the ICD-9 which still listed
disorders for statistical reasons as opposed to
clinical utility).
– DSM-III included multiaxial system.
– Explicit diagnostic criteria.
– Descriptive approach neutral to etiology theory.
– Unlike its predecessors, DSM-III, it was based on
scientific evidence. Its reliability was improved with
the addition of explicit diagnostic criteria and
structured interviews.
– Although ICD and DSM were similar in term ...
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, .docxtodd241
The Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual of Mental Disorders,
Fifth Edition (DSM-5)
Cardwell C. Nuckols, PhD
[email protected]
www.cnuckols.com
mailto:[email protected]�
HISTORY OF THE DSM
• 1840 1 Dx – U.S. Census – Idiocy/Insanity
– Also in the 1840s, southern alienists discovered a
malady called Drapetomania - the inexplicable, mad
longing of a slave for freedom.
• 1880 7 Dx’s – U.S. Census
– Mania – mostly as defined today, a condition
characterized by severely elevated mood.
– Melancholia – would be noted as depression today.
– Monomania - Pathological obsession with a single
subject or idea. Excessive concentration of interest
upon one particular subject or idea. The difference
between monomania and passion can be very subtle
and difficult to recognize.
– Paresis – general or partial paralysis. (This would not
be the last time that a physical affliction crept into
the psychological arena; among the disorders
described in the DSM-IV –TR is snoring, or Breathing
Related Sleep Disorder 780.59, pp. 615-622).
– Dementia – as described today as characterized by
multiple cognitive deficits that include impairment
in memory (most common Alzheimer's).
– Dipsomania - An insatiable craving for alcoholic
beverages.
– Epilepsy
HISTORY OF THE DSM
• 1940 – 26 Dx's (ICD-6; WHO)
– Which took its nomenclature from the US Army and
Veterans Administration nomenclature. The WHO system
included 10 categories for psychoses, 9 for
psychoneuroses, and 7 for disorders of character,
behavior, and intelligence)
• 1952 DSM – 106 Dx’s
– DSM-I included 3 categories of psychopathology: organic
brain syndromes, functional disorders, and mental
deficiency. These categories contained 106
diagnoses. Only one diagnosis, Adjustment Reaction of
Childhood/Adolescence, could be applied to children.
• 1968 DSM-II – 185 Dx’s (revised DSM-II, 1974)
– It had 11 major diagnostic categories. Increased attention
was given to the problems of children and adolescence
with the categorical addition of Behavior Disorders of
Childhood-Adolescence.
– This category included Hyperkinetic Reaction,
Withdrawing Reaction, Overanxious Reaction, Runaway
Reaction, Unsocialized Aggressive Reaction, and Group
Delinquent Reaction.
HISTORY OF THE DSM
Up until December 26, 1974 Homosexuality was considered a form of
deviant behavior and was a psychiatric condition.
HISTORY OF THE DSM
• 1980 DSM-III – 265 Dx’s (roughly coincided with
ICD-9, but differed from the ICD-9 which still listed
disorders for statistical reasons as opposed to
clinical utility).
– DSM-III included multiaxial system.
– Explicit diagnostic criteria.
– Descriptive approach neutral to etiology theory.
– Unlike its predecessors, DSM-III, it was based on
scientific evidence. Its reliability was improved with
the addition of explicit diagnostic criteria and
structured interviews.
– Although ICD and DSM were similar in term.
CHAPTER SEVENAntipsychotic MedicationsThe Evolution of Treatme.docxtiffanyd4
CHAPTER SEVEN
Antipsychotic Medications
The Evolution of Treatment
Many readers may begin this chapter with some familiarity with antipsychotic medications. Others may think antipsychotic medications or the research related to them has not affected their lives. These latter readers may be wrong. Have you ever taken a prescription antihistamine such as Seldane or Allegra? Perhaps got over motion sickness with a compound that included promethazine? If so, your life has been affected by research into antipsychotics. As with so many other areas of research in psychotropic medication, antipsychotics and theories about their use have been developed through combined scientific effort, clinical research, market-driven agendas, and serendipity. Let's look at some history to introduce this topic. The primary source for the following is Healy (2002).
THE CURRENT IMPACT OF ANTIPSYCHOTICS
In a video designed for psychiatrists (Novartis Pharmaceuticals, 1998), a young man suffering from treatment-resistant schizophrenia is shown in an inpatient setting. Although his psychotic symptoms are temporarily under control, he is so incapacitated by medication side effects that he can barely walk across a small room. His movements are jerky contractions of muscle groups that he can hardly control. Anyone who has treated clients taking conventional antipsychotic medications knows that this young man is living a worst-case scenario in which the treatment is worse than the disorder being treated. The video progresses, showing the young man at monthly intervals as he is slowly weaned off the medications causing the side effects, and gradually titrated onto a new medication (clozapine). With each passing month, we see that the young man's psychotic symptoms remain under control but that he is gradually regaining control of his body. In the final video frame, we see the same young man enjoying a game of basketball and apparently having no problems with movement or symptoms of psychosis.
This was one of the first videos promoting what we describe later as an atypical antipsychotic, and at the time of their development most of us believed that clozapine and drugs modeled after its molecular structure launched another revolution in psychopharmacology. It was hoped that (as was hoped in the SSRI revolution in antidepressants) the new antipsychotics would change the way psychotic disorders are treated as well as the quality of life that patients can expect during treatment. As we will see, although newer agents do work better for some but not all people with schizophrenia, the newer agents have problematic side effects similar in impact (if different in quality) as the older agents. Also, the claims that newer medications worked better than the older ones now seem to be untrue ( Jones et al., 2006; Lieberman et al., 2005).
This chapter is divided into seven sections. The first is an overview of schizophrenia and the spectrum of symptoms being treated. The second focuses on th.
263778731218 Abortion Clinic /Pills In Harare ,sisternakatoto
263778731218 Abortion Clinic /Pills In Harare ,ABORTION WOMEN’S CLINIC +27730423979 IN women clinic we believe that every woman should be able to make choices in her pregnancy. Our job is to provide compassionate care, safety,affordable and confidential services. That’s why we have won the trust from all generations of women all over the world. we use non surgical method(Abortion pills) to terminate…Dr.LISA +27730423979women Clinic is committed to providing the highest quality of obstetrical and gynecological care to women of all ages. Our dedicated staff aim to treat each patient and her health concerns with compassion and respect.Our dedicated group ABORTION WOMEN’S CLINIC +27730423979 IN women clinic we believe that every woman should be able to make choices in her pregnancy. Our job is to provide compassionate care, safety,affordable and confidential services. That’s why we have won the trust from all generations of women all over the world. we use non surgical method(Abortion pills) to terminate…Dr.LISA +27730423979women Clinic is committed to providing the highest quality of obstetrical and gynecological care to women of all ages. Our dedicated staff aim to treat each patient and her health concerns with compassion and respect.Our dedicated group of receptionists, nurses, and physicians have worked together as a teamof receptionists, nurses, and physicians have worked together as a team wwww.lisywomensclinic.co.za/
- Video recording of this lecture in English language: https://youtu.be/lK81BzxMqdo
- Video recording of this lecture in Arabic language: https://youtu.be/Ve4P0COk9OI
- Link to download the book free: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/nephrotube-nephrology-books.html
- Link to NephroTube website: www.NephroTube.com
- Link to NephroTube social media accounts: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/join-nephrotube-on-social-media.html
These lecture slides, by Dr Sidra Arshad, offer a quick overview of the physiological basis of a normal electrocardiogram.
Learning objectives:
1. Define an electrocardiogram (ECG) and electrocardiography
2. Describe how dipoles generated by the heart produce the waveforms of the ECG
3. Describe the components of a normal electrocardiogram of a typical bipolar lead (limb II)
4. Differentiate between intervals and segments
5. Enlist some common indications for obtaining an ECG
6. Describe the flow of current around the heart during the cardiac cycle
7. Discuss the placement and polarity of the leads of electrocardiograph
8. Describe the normal electrocardiograms recorded from the limb leads and explain the physiological basis of the different records that are obtained
9. Define mean electrical vector (axis) of the heart and give the normal range
10. Define the mean QRS vector
11. Describe the axes of leads (hexagonal reference system)
12. Comprehend the vectorial analysis of the normal ECG
13. Determine the mean electrical axis of the ventricular QRS and appreciate the mean axis deviation
14. Explain the concepts of current of injury, J point, and their significance
Study Resources:
1. Chapter 11, Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology, 14th edition
2. Chapter 9, Human Physiology - From Cells to Systems, Lauralee Sherwood, 9th edition
3. Chapter 29, Ganong’s Review of Medical Physiology, 26th edition
4. Electrocardiogram, StatPearls - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK549803/
5. ECG in Medical Practice by ABM Abdullah, 4th edition
6. Chapter 3, Cardiology Explained, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2214/
7. ECG Basics, http://www.nataliescasebook.com/tag/e-c-g-basics
Best Ayurvedic medicine for Gas and IndigestionSwastikAyurveda
Here is the updated list of Top Best Ayurvedic medicine for Gas and Indigestion and those are Gas-O-Go Syp for Dyspepsia | Lavizyme Syrup for Acidity | Yumzyme Hepatoprotective Capsules etc
Local Advanced Lung Cancer: Artificial Intelligence, Synergetics, Complex Sys...Oleg Kshivets
Overall life span (LS) was 1671.7±1721.6 days and cumulative 5YS reached 62.4%, 10 years – 50.4%, 20 years – 44.6%. 94 LCP lived more than 5 years without cancer (LS=2958.6±1723.6 days), 22 – more than 10 years (LS=5571±1841.8 days). 67 LCP died because of LC (LS=471.9±344 days). AT significantly improved 5YS (68% vs. 53.7%) (P=0.028 by log-rank test). Cox modeling displayed that 5YS of LCP significantly depended on: N0-N12, T3-4, blood cell circuit, cell ratio factors (ratio between cancer cells-CC and blood cells subpopulations), LC cell dynamics, recalcification time, heparin tolerance, prothrombin index, protein, AT, procedure type (P=0.000-0.031). Neural networks, genetic algorithm selection and bootstrap simulation revealed relationships between 5YS and N0-12 (rank=1), thrombocytes/CC (rank=2), segmented neutrophils/CC (3), eosinophils/CC (4), erythrocytes/CC (5), healthy cells/CC (6), lymphocytes/CC (7), stick neutrophils/CC (8), leucocytes/CC (9), monocytes/CC (10). Correct prediction of 5YS was 100% by neural networks computing (error=0.000; area under ROC curve=1.0).
Adv. biopharm. APPLICATION OF PHARMACOKINETICS : TARGETED DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMSAkankshaAshtankar
MIP 201T & MPH 202T
ADVANCED BIOPHARMACEUTICS & PHARMACOKINETICS : UNIT 5
APPLICATION OF PHARMACOKINETICS : TARGETED DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS By - AKANKSHA ASHTANKAR
- Video recording of this lecture in English language: https://youtu.be/kqbnxVAZs-0
- Video recording of this lecture in Arabic language: https://youtu.be/SINlygW1Mpc
- Link to download the book free: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/nephrotube-nephrology-books.html
- Link to NephroTube website: www.NephroTube.com
- Link to NephroTube social media accounts: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/join-nephrotube-on-social-media.html
2. Changes from DSM-IV-TR to DSM-5
Dr. Hani Hamed Dessoki, M.D.Psychiatry
Prof. Psychiatry
Chairman of Psychiatry Department
Beni Suef University
Supervisor of Psychiatry Department
El-Fayoum University
APA member
7. DSM-II (1968)
134 pages
“Reaction” terminology dropped
Users encouraged to record
multiple psychiatric diagnoses
(in order of importance)
and associated physical conditions
Coincided with ICD-8
(first time ICD included mental disorders)
16. Timeline of DSM-5
1999-2001 Development of Research Agenda
2002-2007 APA/WHO/NIMH DSM-5/ICD-11
Research Planning conferences
2006
Appointment of DSM-5 Taskforce
2007
Appointment of Workgroups
2007-2011 Literature Review and Data Re-analysis
2010-2011 1st phase Field Trials ended July 2011
2011-2012 2nd phase Field Trials began Fall 2011
July 2012
Final Draft of DSM-5 for APA review
May 2013
Publication Date of DSM-5 (APA, 2013)
San Francisco
17. Fourteen years in the making, the
D.S.M.-5 has been the subject of
seemingly endless discussion
21. Major Conceptual Changes
Arabic numbering instead of Roman numbering
Modern fashion like ios system
Allows for future revisions (5.1, 5.2 etc….)
Psychiatry more medicalized
AMC instead of GMC
Cancelling the multiaxial system
Not present in other medical specialties
Undermining personality disorders.
22. DSM -5 and multiaxial system
DSM-5 moves from the multiaxial system to a new
assessment that removes the arbitrary boundaries
between personality disorders and other mental
disorders.
23. Obvious Changes in DSM-5
The DSM-5 will discontinue the Multiaxial Diagnosis,
No more Axis I,II, III, IV & V-which means that
Personality Disorders will now appear as diagnostic
categories and there will be no more GAF score or
listing of psychosocial stressor or contributing medical
conditions.
The Multi-axial model will be replaced by Dimensional
component to diagnostic categories.
26. Section II
Diagnostic Criteria and codes
“Medication-induced Movement Disorders”
“Other Conditions That May be
a Focus of Clinical Attention.”
27. Section III
Emerging Measures and Models
Assessment measures
http://www.psychiatry.org/practice/dsm/dsm5/online-assessment-measures
Cultural formulation
Alternative DSM-5 model for personality
disorders
“Criteria Sets for Conditions
for Further Study”
28. NOS categories
The new version replaces the NOS categories
with two options: other specified
disorder and unspecified disorder to increase the
utility to the clinician.
The first allows the clinician to specify the reason
that the criteria for a specific disorder are not met;
the second allows the clinician the option to forgo
specification.
29. NOS DSM IV = 41
Other/Unspecified DSM-5 =65
(To match ICD-10)
34. CHANGES
New categories:
Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders
Trauma- and Stressor-Related Disorders
Transformed:
Neurodevelopmental Disorders
(Infancy, adolescence, childhood)
Somatic Symptom and Related Disorders
35. New Disorders
Disinhibited Social Engagement Disorder (split
from Reactive Attachment Disorder)
Binge Eating Disorder
Central Sleep Apnea
Sleep-Related Hypoventilation
Rapid Eye Movement Sleep Behavior Disorder
36. New Disorders
Restless Legs Syndrome
Caffeine Withdrawal
Cannabis Withdrawal
Major Neurocognitive Disorder with Lewy Body Disease
(Dementia Due to Other Medical Conditions)
Mild Neurocognitive Disorder
37. New Disorders
Social (Pragmatic) Communication Disorder
Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder
Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder
Hoarding Disorder
Excoriation (Skin‐Picking) Disorder
42. STRUCTURE FOR EACH DIAGNOSIS
Diagnositic Criteria
Subtypes and/or specifiers
Severity
Codes and recording procedures
Explanatory text (new or expanded)
43. STRUCTURE FOR EACH
DIAGNOSIS
Diagnostic and associated features
Prevalence
Development and course
Risk and prognosis
Culture- and gender-related factors
45. Revision Guidelines for DSM-5
Any changes to the DSM-5 in the future must be made in
light of maintaining continuity with previous editions for this
reason the DSM-5 is not using Roman numeral V but rather
5 since later editions or revision would be DSM-5.1, DSM-5.2
etc.
There are no preset limitations on the number of changes
that may occur over time with the new DSM-5
The DSM-5 will continue to exist as a living, evolving
document that can be updated and reinterpreted over time
46. Deconstruction Movement
The “deconstruction” movement in schizophrenia
(or any of the other categories) seeks to
disassemble the existing categorical diagnosis
into better-defined working parts, integrating data
from genetics, neuroimaging, psychology and
other disciplines, and
then group symptoms that cluster together in
order to rebuild them into a more valid working
definition of schizophrenia.
47. Support for DSM-5 (5)
Sinclair (2010) pointed out in the review of the
progress made in the revision process that new
DSM-5 disorders are considered, based on
clinical need, distinct manifestations, potential
harm, and potential for treatment.
48. Critique of S12 Mild Neurocognitive
Disorder
Society for Humanistic Psychology (2011) stated that
“We are also gravely concerned about the introduction
of disorder categories that risk misuse in particularly
vulnerable populations. For example, Mild
Neurocognitive Disorder might be diagnosed in elderly
with expected cognitive decline, especially in memory
functions.
49. More radical criticisms
The extremely high rates of comorbidity (ranging
from dimensional diagnosis to various forms of
etiopathogenetic diagnosis).
The financial association of DSM-5 panel members
with industry continues to be a concern for financial
conflict of interest.
Of the DSM-5 task force members, 69% report
having ties to the pharmaceutical industry, an
increase from the 57% of DSM-IV task force
members.
50. Impact of DSM-5 on Mental Health
Counselors
Nov 8, 2011 in letter from American Counseling
Association ACA President Dr. Don W. Locke
to APA President Dr. John Oldham,
Locke indicated that there are 120,000 licensed
professional counselors in U.S. -- second largest
group that routinely uses DSM -- and that these
professionals have expressed uncertainty about
quality & credibility of DSM-5
51. ACA’s Concerns about DSM-5
(1)
ACA is concerned that many of proposed revisions
will promote
Inaccurate diagnoses
Diagnostic inflation
Prescribing of unnecessary & potentially harmful
medication.
52. Future directions
National Institute of Mental Health – “NIMH will be reorienting its research away from DSM categories,”
towards it’s own research oriented criteria. “NIMH has
launched the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) project to
transform diagnosis by incorporating genetics, imaging,
cognitive science, and other levels of information to lay
the foundation for a new classification system.”
http://www.nimh.nih.gov/about/director/2013/transformingdiagnosis.shtml
NIMH also stated that future research projects utilizing
DSM-5 criteria will likely not be funded, and researchers
will need to use RDoC’s to gain funding.
61. Appendix
Highlights of changes
from DSM-IV to DSM-5
Glossary of technical terms
Glossary of cultural terms
Alpha & numeric listings of
diagnoses and codes
List of advisors and contributors
62. Specific Changes Per Diagnostic
Category in DSM-5
Neurodevelopmental
IQ no longer used as criteria for Intellectual
Developmental Disorder but the IQ still is
understood to be below 70
Asperger's Syndrome will be lumped into Autism
Spectrum since it is at the milder end of the
Spectrum
63. Specific Changes Per Diagnostic
Category in DSM-5
Schizophrenia and Other Psychotic Disorders
Schizotypal Personality Disorder B01 moved to
this category
Added Attenuated Psychosis Syndrome B06
64. Specific Changes Per Diagnostic
Category in DSM-5
Bipolar and related disorders
Bipolar is now a free standing category
Taken out of the mood disorder category
65. Specific Changes Per Diagnostic
Category in DSM-5
Depressive Disorders
Dysthymia now called Chronic Depressive
Disorder D03
Added Prementrual Dysphoric Disorder D04
Added Mixed Anxiety/Depression D05
66. Specific Changes Per Diagnostic
Category in DSM-5
Anxiety Disorders
No longer has PTSD in this category
No longer has OCD in this category
Social Phobia now called Social Anxiety Disorder
E04
67. Specific Changes Per Diagnostic
Category in DSM-5
Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders
OCD is now a stand alone category
Body Dysmorphic Disorder listed under OCD as F01
Added Hoarding under category of OCD as F02
Trichotillomania now called Hair-Pulling Disorder is
listed under OCD as F03
Skin Picking Disorder moved under OCD as F04
68. Specific Changes Per Diagnostic
Category in DSM-5
Trauma and Stressor Related Disorders
Trauma related disorders are now a stand alone category
Reactive Attachment Disorder is now listed here G00
Added Disinhibited Social Engagement Disorder G01
Added PSTD in Preschool Children G03
Acute Stress Disorder is now listed here G04
PTSD is now listed here G05
Adjustment Disorders are now listed here G06
69. Specific Changes Per Diagnostic
Category in DSM-5
Dissociative Disorders
Depersonalization/Derealization Disorder renamed
in H00
Dissociative Fugue has been removed from this
category
70. Specific Changes Per Diagnostic
Category in DSM-5
Somatic Symptom Disorder
Replaced Somatiform Disorders with this category
Eliminated the following: Somatization Disorder;
Pain Disorder; and Hypochondriasis
Added Complex Somatic Symptom Disorder J00
Added Simple Somatic Symptom Disorder J01
Added Illness Anxiety Disorder J02
Conversion Disorder renamed Functional
Neurological Disorder J03
71. Specific Changes Per Diagnostic
Category in DSM-5
Feeding and Eating Disorders
Pica K00 moved to this category
Rumination Disorder K01 moved to this category
Added Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder
K02
Added Binge Eating Disorder K05
72. Specific Changes Per Diagnostic
Category in DSM-5
Elimination Disorders
This category was created as freestanding
category
Enuresis moved to this category L00
Encopresis moved to this category L01
73. Specific Changes Per Diagnostic
Category in DSM-5
Sleep-Wake Disorders (1)
Primary Insomnia renamed Insomnia Disorder M00
Primary Hypersomnia joined with Narcolepsy
without Cataplexy M01
Added Kleine Levin Syndrome M02 (intermittent
excessive sleep with behavior change)
Added Obstructive Sleep Apnea Hypopnea
Syndrome M03
Added Primary Central Sleep Apnea M04
74. Specific Changes Per Diagnostic
Category in DSM-5
Sleep-Wake Disorders (2)
Added Primary Alveolar Hypoventiation M05
Added Disorder of Arousal M08
Added Rapid Eye Movement Behavior Disorder
M09
Added Restless Leg Syndrome M10
Eliminated: Sleep Terror Disorder & Sleepwalking
Disorder
75. Specific Changes Per Diagnostic
Category in DSM-5
Sexual Dysfunction
Male orgasmic disorder renamed Delay Ejaculation
N02
Premature Ejaculation renamed Early Ejaculation
N03
Dyspareunia and Vaginismus combined into
Genito-Pelvic Pain/Penetraion Disorder N06
Sexual Aversion Disorder combined in other
categories
76. Specific Changes Per Diagnostic
Category in DSM-5
Disruptive Impulse Control and Conduct
Disorders
Gambling removed from this category
Oppositional Defiant Disorder Q00 was moved
Trichotillomania removed from this category
Conduct Disorder Q06 was moved
Antisocial Personality Disorder renamed Dyssocial
Personality Disorder Q07 moved to this category
77. Specific Changes Per Diagnostic
Category in DSM-5
Substance Abuse and Addictive Disorders
Only 3 qualifiers are used in the category: Use replaces both abuse and dependence while
Intoxication and Withdrawal remain the same
Nicotine Related renamed Tobacco Use Disorder R09
Added Caffeine Withdrawal R24
Added Cannabis Withdrawal R25
Polysubstance Abuse categories discontinued
Added Gambling R31 added to category
78. Specific Changes Per Diagnostic
Category in DSM-5
Neurocognitive Disorders
Category replaces Delirium, Dementia, and Amnestic and Other
Cognitive Disorders Category
Now distinguishes between Minor and Major Disorders
Replace wording of Dementia due to ... with Neurocognitive
Disorder Associated with for all the conditions listed
Added Fronto-Temporal Lobar Degeneration S15/S27; Traumatic
Brain Injury S16/S28; Lewy Body Disease S17/S29
Renamed Head Trauma to Traumatic Brain Injury
Renamed Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease to Prion Disease
79. Specific Changes Per Diagnostic
Category in DSM-5
Personality Disorders
Only six Personality Disorders remain in this category:
Borderline T00; Obsessive-Compulsive T01; Avoidant T02;
Schizotypal T03; Antisocial T04; Narcissistic T05
Schizotypal Personality Disorder T03 also under Schizophrenia
and Other Psychotic Disorders B02
Antisocial Personality Disorder T04 also under Disruptive
Impulse Control and Conduct Disorders as Dyssocial
Personality Disorder Q07
This category no longer stands alone as another AXIS II but
rather as a diagnosed category with dimensions
80. Specific Changes Per Diagnostic
Category in DSM-5
Paraphilias
They all carry over to the DSM-5 new names
U00 Exhibitionistic Disorder; U01 Fetishistic Disorder;
U02 Frotieuristic Disorder; U03 Pedophilic Disorder;
U04 Sexual Masochism Disorder; U05 Sexual
Sadism Disorder; U06 Tranvestic Disorder; U07
Voyeuristic Disorder
81. Possible New DSM-5 Disorders
Not added to date:
Dissociative Trance Disorder
Anxious Depression
Complicated /Prolonged Grief
Factitious disorder imposed on another
Non-suicidal Self Injury
Hypersexual Disorder
Olfactory Reference Syndrome
Paraphilic Coercive Disorder
83. Critique of B06
Attenuated Psychosis Syndrome
British Psychological Society (2011) stated the
concept of “attenuated psychosis system” appears
very worrying; it could be seen as an opportunity to
stigmatize eccentric people, and to lower the
threshold for achieving a diagnosis of psychosis.
Society for Humanistic Psychology (2011) stated
Attenuated Psychosis Syndrome describes
experiences common in general population, which
was developed from a “risk” concept with strikingly
low predictive validity for conversion to full
psychosis.
84. Critique of D00 Disruptive Mood
Dysregulation Disorder
Society for Humanistic Psychology (2011) stated Children and
adolescents will be particularly susceptible to receiving a
diagnosis of Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder or
Attenuated Psychosis Syndrome.
The British Psychological Society (2011) stated putative
diagnoses such as Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder
presented in DSM-5 are clearly based largely on social norms,
with 'symptoms' that all rely on subjective judgments, with little
confirmatory physical 'signs' or evidence of biological
causation. They stated that the criteria used for this diagnosis
in the DSM-5 are not value-free, but rather reflect current
normative social expectations.
85. Support for DSM-5 (1)
Kupfer, Regier & Kuhl (2008) reassured the mental
health community that the creators of the DSM-5
followed a set of revision principals to guide the
efforts of the DSM-V Work Groups: grounding
recommendations in empirical evidence;
maintaining continuity with previous editions of
DSM; removing a priori limitations on the amount of
changes DSM-V may incur; and maintaining DSM’s
status as a living document.
86. Support for DSM-5 (2)
Middleton (2008) stated that from a clinical
viewpoint it is reasonable to hope that the DSM-5
would provide a scheme of diagnostic classification
to determine whether or not a particular set of
symptoms reflects 'mental illness’ (case definition),
provides an effective way of improving public health
by detecting 'hidden’ cases for treatment (case
detection), and identifies indications for particular
forms of treatment (guide treatment).
87. Support for DSM-5 (3)
Maser, Norman, Zisook, Everall, Stein, Shettler & Judd
(2009) pointed out changes in criterion in DSM-5 will
reduce comorbidity, allow symptom weighting, introduce
non-criterion symptoms, eliminate NOS categories &
provide new directions to biological researchers. They
suggested reevaluating threshold concept & use of
quality-of-life assessment with framework for such a
revision. Drawbacks to changes coming from DSM-5
include retraining of clinicians & administrative & policy
changes
88. Support for DSM-5 (4)
Regier, Kuhl, Kupfer & McNulty (2010) reassured
the public in using the following quote “In pursuit of
increasing the accuracy and clinical utility of the
DSM, we need people with mental illness to help us
understand what they are struggling with and how
best to identify it.”
89. Support for DSM-5 (6)
British Psychological Association (2011) did support
the rating of the severity of different symptoms
called “the dimensional classifications, which are
proposed in the DSM-5. They supported that use of
dimensions because it would take away the focus
on specific problems and recognize the variability
among symptoms in the diagnosing process. But did
criticize as well.
90. Critique of DSM-5 (1)
Kraemer, Shrout & Rubio-Stipec (2007) : Disorder represents something of a
medical concern in patient, abnormality, injury, aberration, word is used when
etiology or pathological process leading to disorder is unknown.
Disease generally indicates known pathological process.
Disorder may comprise two or more separate diseases, or one disease may
actually be viewed as two or more separate disorders, an issue of concern
because of well-known comorbidity of psychiatric disorders
Diagnosis procedure to decide whether or not certain disorder or disease is
present in patient so a disorder or disease is characteristic of patient
Diagnosis is opinion that disorder or disease is present. Quality of diagnosis
depends on how well opinion relates to characteristics of patient, issue of
concern in reliability & validity assessments
91. Critique of DSM-5 (2)
Dalal & Sivakumar (2009) warned that a classification is as
good as its theory. They pointed out that the etiology of
psychiatric disorders is still not clearly known, and that we
still define them categorically by their clinical syndrome. They
stated that there are doubts if they are valid discrete disease
entities and if dimensional models are better to study them.
They concluded that we have come a long way till ICD-10
and DSM-IV, but there are shortcomings and that with
advances in genetics and neurobiology in the future,
classification of psychiatric disorders should improve further.
92. Critique of DSM-5 (3)
Moller (2009) stated that the dimensional
perspective recommended to be used in the DSM-5
needs to be pursued cautiously given that using
such a perspective would mean that syndromes
would have to be assessed in a standardized way
for each person seeking help from the psychiatric
service system. Therefore this system would need
to be multi-dimensional assessment covering all
syndromes existing within different psychiatric
disorders.
93. Critique of DSM-5 (4)
McLaren (2010) held that it does not matter if the language in
the DSM-5 is updated. It is of no account if categories are
reshuffled, broadened, blurred, or loosened; the faults are
conceptual, not operational, a case of old wine in new bottles.
The DSM-5 Task Force has spent some 3 million hours so far
(600 people at 10 hours per week for 10 years), and the
biggest jobs are still to come. It has been 3 million wasted
hours, just as all those psychoanalytic textbooks and
conferences, plus the therapeutic hours on the analyst’s
couch, were wasted. It is the wrong model.
94. Critique of DSM-5 (5)
Ben-Zeev, Young & Corrigan (2010) explored the
relationship between diagnostic labels and stigma
in the context of the DSM-5. They looked at three
types of negative outcomes – public stigma, selfstigma, and label avoidance. They concluded that
a clinical diagnosis under the DSM-5 may
exacerbate these forms of stigma through sociocognitive processes of groupness, homogeneity,
and stability.
95. Critique of DSM-5 (6)
Andrews, Sunderland & Kemp (2010) concluded
that the diagnostic thresholds for social phobia and
for obsessive–compulsive disorder are less
stringent than that for the other disorders and
require revision in DSM-V. The concern is for
Bracket Creep.
96. Critique of DSM-5 (7)
Wittchen (2010) in her criticism of the process
pointed out that the barriers to having women’s
issues addressed in the DSM-5 is the
fragmentation of the field of women's mental
health research, lack of emphasis on diagnostic
classificatory issues beyond a few selected clinical
conditions, and finally, the “current rules of game”
used by the current DSM-V Task Forces in the
revision process of DSM-5.
97. Critique of DSM-5 (8a)
The British Psychological Society (2011) put out a
major critique of the DSM-5.
Their concern: clients and general public are
negatively affected by “medicalization of their natural
and normal responses to their experiences;
responses which undoubtedly have distressing
consequences which demand helping responses, but
which do not reflect illnesses so much as normal
individual variation.”
98. Critique of DSM-5 (8b)
The BPS (2011)also stated that putative diagnoses
presented in DSM-5 are clearly based largely on social
norms, with 'symptoms' that all rely on subjective
judgments, with little confirmatory physical 'signs' or
evidence of biological causation. They stated that criteria
used in DSM-5 are not value-free, but rather reflect
current normative social expectations. The BPA pointed
out that researchers have pointed out that psychiatric
diagnoses are plagued by problems of reliability, validity,
prognostic value, and co-morbidity.
99. Critique of DSM-5 (9a)
The Society for Humanistic Psychology (2011) questioned the
proposed changes to the definition(s) of mental disorder that
deemphasize sociocultural variation while placing more
emphasis on biological theory. They stated that in light of the
growing empirical evidence that neurobiology does not fully
account for the emergence of mental distress, as well as new
longitudinal studies revealing long-term hazards of standard
neurobiological (psychotropic) treatment, “we believe that
these changes pose substantial risks to patients/clients,
practitioners, and the mental health professions in general.”
100. Critique of DSM-5 (9b)
The Society for Humanistic Psychology (2011) pointed out:
The proposed removal of Major Depressive Disorder’s
bereavement exclusion, which currently prevents the
pathologization of grief, a normal life process.
The reduction in the number of criteria necessary for the
diagnosis of Attention Deficit Disorder, a diagnosis that is
already subject to epidemiological inflation.
The reduction in symptomatic duration and the number of
necessary criteria for the diagnosis of Generalized Anxiety
Disorder.
101. Critique of DSM-5 (10)
ACA Blog (2012) K. Dayle Jones points out: very few
substantive changes have been made in response to public
comments since first drafts were posted-despite fact so many
proposals have been so heavily criticized. Final public
comment period originally scheduled for September- October
2011, has been twice postponed because everything is so far
behind–first to January-February 2012 and now to May 2012.
Given the late date, new public feedback will almost certainly
have no impact whatever on DSM-5 & appears to be no more
than a public relations gimmick.