GPGPU Computation

GPGPU Computation
Introduction, Performance Analysis
and optimization
A Tutorial
Giannis Tsagatakis
jtsagata@gmail.com
Msc in Informatics & Multimedia
Department of Informatics Engineering TEI of Crete

2
Warning
In GP-GPU computing we deal with HUGE numbers
– In number of threads
– In Teraflops
– In number of “cores”
– In throughput
– And in number of slides
It’s more a tutorial / handout
There are better slides out there

Do you have a
sound blaster card
in your PC ?
Why not ?
Remember the days you have one?
Do you have a graphics card in your PC?
Why ?

Agenda
●
General purpose GPU Computing
– Not about computer graphics
●
Vendor Specific (NVIDIA CUDA)
– With a bit of OpenCL and OpenACC
●
Not focus on parallel algorithms
●
Touch some optimization topics
– Mostly on memory bandwidth optimization
●
I try to be self contained
– No previous experience need it
– But there is a lot to cover

9
The road to GP GPU Computing
●
Let’s use shaders to do computation
●
Problems:
– Describe problem in native language
– Bad floating point computations
– Limited memory access patterns
●
GP GPU
– Better hardware
– CUDA, OpenCL, openACC
Where is my
Sound Blaster ?

10
A brief History
●
The fixed graphics
pipeline era
– 1980 OpenGL Expensive
Graphics Workstations
(50.000$)
– 1990 DirectX PC graphics
(200$)
●
The programmable
Graphics pipeline era
– 2001, NVIDIA NV20 (GeForce 3)
– 2002 ATI Radeon 9700
– Shader Languages
Cg, GLSL, HLSL
– Direct X8/9
●
Unified Graphics and
Computing era
– 2006, GeForce 8800
– CUDA, OpenCL
– OpenACC
– Direct X10,
– Vulkan
– Direct Compute
– OpenGL 4.X
●
Deep Learning
●
The bright future
– GPUs ? TPUs? FPGAs ?

11
NVIDIA Timeline
●
1999 GeForce 256
●
2001 GeForce 2
Programmable
●
2004 Scalable Link
Interface
●
2006 CUDA
●
2007 Tesla
– Unified shader model
●
2009 Fermi
– Fused multiply add
●
2013 Kepler
– Dynamic parallelism
– Unified memory
●
2014 Maxwell
●
2016 Pascal
– Page mitigation engine
– High bandwidth memory
– NVLink
●
2017 Volta
– Tensor cores

12
The death of CPU Scaling
●
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-
2680
– Cores 14
– Threads 28
●
Single thread utilization
– Advanced Vector
Extensions
– AVX2 (256 bits)
8 x 32bit
28 x 8 =224, X2 = 448
– Single Thread: 0.22% max
– AVX-512
●
Is that a lot of
computation ;

13
The rise (and limits) of Many-Core

14
High Performance Computing (HPA)
GPUs, TPUs, FPGAs, ASICs

15
CPU vs GPU
Latency oriented design Throughput oriented design

16
Massive Parallelism
Pascal GP100 Block Diagram

17
Streaming Multiprocessor
Pascal GP100 Streaming Multiprocessor
Special
Function
Unit
LD/ST
Load/Store
Unit
Double
Precision
Unit

19
Tensor Cores on Volta
https://devblogs.nvidia.com/programming-tensor-cores-cuda-9/

20
Volta GV100
●
5,376 32-bit integer cores
●
5,376 32-bit floating point cores
●
2,688 64-bit floating point cores
●
672 Tensor Cores
●
336 texture units
●
4096bit memory bus width
●
21.1 Billion Transistors / 815 mm2 / 12nm
●
300 Watt
●
$9,269.00 & FREE shipping 32GB Bulk (Amazon).

21
Communication Patterns
Eight GPU hybrid cube mesh architecture with NVLink.

23
NVidia Accelerating Computing

24
What is CUDA
●
Development Tools
●
Performance
Analysis Tools
●
CUDA
– Compute Unified
Device Architecture
– Parallel computing
platform and API
– C/C++/Fortran
– OpenACC, OpenCL
compatible

25
CUDA Parallel Computing Platform

26
The many ways to GPU Acceleration
●
Libraries
– Drop in replacements
– Minimal code changes
●
OpenACC Directives
– Easily Accelerate
Applications
●
Programming
Languages
– C/C++, Fortran, LLVM
– MATLAB, Mathematica,
LabVIEW
– Maximum Flexibility
●
Parallel languages
– Copperhead (python)
– Halide (image
processing)
●
Software stacks
Deep learning stack
– Keras
●
Tensor Flow
– CUDA libararies
●
CUDAnn, Digits, cuBlas

27
Domain Specific Libraries
Heterogeneous CPU
GPU-based architectures
CUDA, Intel Xeon Phi,
OpenCL
From the writers of
LAPACK
BSD License

33
Heterogeneous Architectures

35
Compute Capabilities
https://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/cuda-c-programming-guide/index.html#compute-capabilities
Compute capability is about capabilities and not about computation power

37
SIMD
// SIMD ???
if (x>a) {
y=2*x;
} else {
y=2*(x+1);
}
/* t=0 */ z=bool(x>a);
/* t=1 */ y1 = 2 * x;
/* t=2 */ t = x +1;
/* t=3 */ y2 = 2 *t;
/* t=4 */ y = z *y1;
/* t=5 */ y += not(z) *y1;
Branches
If every thread
choose a different
path we have to
do double work.
In CUDA every 32 threads form a warp.
Its good not to have thread diversity within a wrap.

38
Systematic Optimization
Weak ScalingWeak Scaling: Run a larger
problem
Strong ScalingStrong Scaling : Run a problem
faster

39
The Big Picture
●
Optimize throughput
– Not latency
●
Choose an algorithm that
– Keeps all threads busy
– Keeps all SMs busy
– Optimize memory transfers
●
Must know parallel algorithms
– Not the same as serial ones
– Not in your Data Structures and Algorithms book
Image from : Efficient Parallel Algorithms (CS329) Warwick University

40
Appetizer
A First Taste of Cuda

41
A Simple Cuda Kernel
SAXPY stands for “Single-Precision A·X Plus Y”. It is a function
in the standard Basic Linear Algebra Subroutines (BLAS)library.
SAXPY is a combination of scalar multiplication and vector
addition, and it’s very simple: it takes as input two vectors of
32-bit floats X and Y with N elements each, and a scalar value A.
It multiplies each element X[i] by A and adds the result to Y[i].
__global__
void saxpy(int n, float a, float *x, float *y)
{
int i = blockIdx.x*blockDim.x + threadIdx.x;
if (i < n) y[i] = a*x[i] + y[i];
}
// Perform SAXPY on 1M elements
int N = 1<<20;
saxpy<<<<<<40964096, 256, 256>>>>>>(N, 2.0f, d_x, d_y);

42
Kernel instance parameters
●
gridDim.{x,y,z}
The dimensions of the grid
●
blockDim.{x,y,z}
The dimensions of the block
●
blockIdx.{x,y,z}
The index of the current block within the grid
●
threadIdx.{x,y,z}
The index of the current thread with the block

43
Configuring the kernel launch
// Run kernel on 1M elements on the GPU
int N = 1<<20;
int blockSize = 256;
int numBlocks = (N + blockSize - 1) / blockSize;
squaresquare<<<<<<numBlocks, blockSizenumBlocks, blockSize>>>>>>(N, input, output);(N, input, output);
Number of blocks to run
Maximum Number of
Threads/block
(max 1024 on newer GPUs)
Conceptual model:
●
All threads starts at the same time
●
Threads wraps (n usually 32)
●
Synchronization and memory sharing within a block
●
Threads can be execute in any order
●
Scalability by using a more expensive GPU

44
Block grid configurations
/** 1D grid of 1D blocks **/
__device__ int getGlobalIdx_1D_1D()
{
return blockIdxblockIdx.x *blockDimblockDim.x + threadIdxthreadIdx.x;
}
/* 2D grid of 2D blocks */
{
int blockId = blockIdx.x + blockIdx.y * gridDim.x;
int threadId = blockId * (blockDim.x * blockDim.y) +
(threadIdx.y * blockDim.x) + threadIdx.x;
return threadId;
}
/* . . . . . . . . . . */
/* 3D grid of 3D blocks */
{
int blockId = blockIdx.x
+ blockIdx.y * gridDim.x
+ gridDim.x * gridDim.y * blockIdx.z;
int threadId = blockId * (blockDim.x * blockDim.y * blockDim.z)
+ (threadIdx.z * (blockDim.x * blockDim.y))
+ (threadIdx.y * blockDim.x)
+ threadIdx.x;
return threadId;
}

45
Choose size
●
Match data organization
●
Maximize occupancy (active threads)
– Shared memory usage
– Register usage
– Multiplies of 32 (warp size)
●
A black art

46
The 3 steps to CUDA acceleration
cudaMemcpy(d_x, x, N*sizeof(float),
cudaMemcpyHostToDevicecudaMemcpyHostToDevice);
cudaMemcpy(d_y, y, N*sizeof(float),
cudaMemcpyHostToDevicecudaMemcpyHostToDevice);
Images from NVIDIA, and Tasos Maragkos (tasmar)

47
The 3 steps to CUDA accelaration
saxpy<<<100, 256>>>(N, 2.0f, d_x, d_y);

48
The 3 steps to CUDA accelaration v
cudaMemcpy(y, d_y, N*sizeof(float),
cudaMemcpyDeviceToHostcudaMemcpyDeviceToHost);

49
Calling the Kernel, The hard way
int main(void) {
int N = 1<<20;
float *x, *y, *d_x, *d_y;
x = (float*)malloc(N*sizeof(float));
y = (float*)malloc(N*sizeof(float));
cudaMalloc(&d_x, N*sizeof(float));
cudaMalloc(&d_y, N*sizeof(float));
for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) {x[i] = 1.0f; y[i] = 2.0f;}
cudaMemcpy(d_x, x, N*sizeof(float), cudaMemcpyHostToDevice);
cudaMemcpy(d_y, y, N*sizeof(float), cudaMemcpyHostToDevice);
saxpy<<<(N+255)/256, 256>>>(N, 2.0f, d_x, d_y);
cudaMemcpy(y, d_y, N*sizeof(float), cudaMemcpyDeviceToHost);
float maxError = 0.0f;
for (int i = 0; i < N; i++){ maxError = max(maxError, abs(y[i]-4.0f));}
printf("Max error: %fn", maxError);
cudaFree(d_x); cudaFree(d_y); free(x); free(y);
}

51
Calling the Kernel, The easy way
int main(void)
{
int N = 1<<20; // 1M elements
// Allocate Unified Memory -- accessible from CPU or GPU
float *x, *y;
cudaMallocManaged(&x, N*sizeof(float));
cudaMallocManaged(&y, N*sizeof(float));
// Init arrays ....
saxpy<<<(N+255)/256, 256>>>(N, 2.0f, x, y);
// Wait for GPU to finish before accessing on host
cudaDeviceSynchronize();
float maxError = 0.0f;
for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
maxError = max(maxError, abs(y[i]-4.0f));
printf("Max error: %fn", maxError);
// Free memory
cudaFree(x);
cudaFree(y);
}
https://devblogs.nvidia.com/even-easier-introduction-cuda/
Unified memoryUnified memory
architecturearchitecture
https://devblogs.nvidia.com/unified-memory-in-cuda-6/

52
Unified memory architecture
●
Kepler GPU: no page fault support, limited virtual space, CUDA-6
●
Pascal GPU: page fault support, extended virtual address space (48-bit),
CUDA-8
●
Volta GPU: Access counters, NVLINK2

53
“Basic” Profiling with nvprof
Lots of other metrics
nvprof –-query-metrics

54
Speedup! Initialize with a Kernel
__global__ void init_kernel(int n, NUMBER *x, NUMBER *y)
{
if (i < n) {
x[i] = 1.0f;
y[i] = 2.0f;
}
}
https://devblogs.nvidia.com/unified-memory-cuda-beginners/

55
Speedup! The fastest
__global__
void barrier_kernel(int n, NUMBER a, NUMBER *x, NUMBER *y)
{
if (i < n) { y[i] = a*x[i] + y[i];
x[i] = 1.0f;
y[i] = 2.0f;
// Not really need it here
__syncthreads();
y[i] = a*x[i] + y[i];
}
}
https://devblogs.nvidia.com/unified-memory-cuda-beginners/

56
The Timings
CPU Simple Kernel Easy Kernel Implace Easy Implace Prefeched Barrier
0
2000000
4000000
6000000
8000000
10000000
12000000
0
2000000
4000000
6000000
8000000
10000000
12000000
Time
Min
Max
Mean

57
Advanced Profiling using
NVIDIA Visual Profiler
Nvvp
or
nSight
IDE

59
Verdict : Memory statistics

61
Open CL
●
Khronos Group
– Apple, Altera, AMD, ARM, Xilinx, Intel, Creative, ...
●
Heterogeneous Platform
– CPUs, GPUs, DSPs, FPGAs,
– Accelerators (Intel Movidius, Adapteva)
●
Active development
– OpenCL 2.2 (2017)
●
To be merged with Vulkan
●
There is also OpenGL Compute Shaders
●
More complex to code
– Maximize portability, easy implementation

62
An OpenCL Kernel
●
The Kernel
__kernel void vector_add(__global const int *A, __global const int *B, __global int *C) {
// Get the index of the current element to be processed
int i = get_global_id(0);
// Do the operation
C[i] = A[i] + B[i];
}
// 100 Lines of Code
// Create a program from the kernel source
cl_program program = clCreateProgramWithSource(context, 1,
(const char **)&source_str, (const size_t *)&source_size, &ret);
// Build the program
ret = clBuildProgram(program, 1, &device_id, NULL, NULL, NULL);
// Create the OpenCL kernel
cl_kernel kernel = clCreateKernel(program, "vector_add", &ret);
// Set the arguments of the kernel
ret = clSetKernelArg(kernel, 0, sizeof(cl_mem), (void *)&a_mem_obj);
ret = clSetKernelArg(kernel, 1, sizeof(cl_mem), (void *)&b_mem_obj);
ret = clSetKernelArg(kernel, 2, sizeof(cl_mem), (void *)&c_mem_obj);
// Execute the OpenCL kernel on the list
size_t global_item_size = LIST_SIZE; // Process the entire lists
size_t local_item_size = 64; // Divide work items into groups of 64
ret = clEnqueueNDRangeKernel(command_queue, kernel, 1, NULL,
&global_item_size, &local_item_size, 0, NULL, NULL);
https://www.eriksmistad.no/getting-started-with-opencl-and-gpu-computing/
●
The Setup
– AMD SDK
– Intel OpenCL
SDK
– Cuda
– Xilinx
SDAccel
●
The Driver

63
The C++ Way: THRUST
●
Analogous to C++ STL
– Containers, iterators, algorithms
●
Template power to CUDA programming
● thrust::device_vector
– sorting: thrust::sort and thrust::sort_by_key
– transformations: thrust::transform
– reductions: thrust::reduce and thrust::transform_reduce
– scans: thrust::inclusive_scan, thrust::exclusive_scan,
thrust::transform_inclusive_scan
●
CUDA, OpenMP, TBB
●
Apache License v 2.0
https://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/thrust/index.html

64
Alternative Ways to SAXPY
Thrust & cuBLAS
using thrust::placeholders;
int N = 1<<20;
thrust::host_vector x(N), y(N);
...
// alloc and copy host to device
thrust::device_vector d_x = x;
thrust::device_vector d_y = y;
// Perform SAXPY C++ STLC++ STL Way
thrust::transform(d_x.begin(), d_x.end(),
d_y.begin(), d_y.begin(), 2.0f * _1 + _2);
// copy results to the host vector
y = d_y;
int N = 1<<20;
cublasInit();
cublasSetVector(N, sizeof(x[0]), x, 1, d_x, 1);
cublasSetVector(N, sizeof(y[0]), y, 1, d_y, 1);
cublasSaxpy(N, 2.0, d_x, 1, d_y, 1);
cublasGetVector(N, sizeof(y[0]), d_y, 1, y, 1);
cublasShutdown();
https://devblogs.nvidia.com/six-ways-saxpy/
ThrustThrust

65
Open ACC
void
saxpy(int n, float a, float * restrict x,
float * restrict y) {
#pragma acc kernels
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i)
y[i] = a*x[i] + y[i];
}
...
// Looks like a normal C call
saxpy(1<<20, 2.0, x, y);
#pragma acc kernels
#pragma acc parallel
#pragma acc data
#pragma acc loop
#pragma acc cache
#pragma acc update
#pragma acc declare
#pragma acc wait
https://www.openacc.org/
●
Directive based
●
Cray, Nvidia, PGI
●
Extension of openMP
– Will be merged

66
Even More Ways to SAXPY
Python & Fortran
module mymodule contains
attributes(global) subroutine saxpy(n, a, x, y)
real :: x(:), y(:), a
integer :: n, i
attributes(value) :: a, n
i = threadIdx%x+(blockIdx%x-1)*blockDim%x
if (i<=n) y(i) = a*x(i)+y(i)
end subroutine saxpy
end module mymodule
program main
use cudafor; use mymodule
real, device :: x_d(2**20), y_d(2**20)
x_d = 1.0, y_d = 2.0
! Perform SAXPY on 1M elements
call saxpy<<<4096, 256>>>(2**20, 2.0, x_d, y_d)
end program main
from copperhead import *
import numpy as np
@cu
def saxpy(a, x, y):
return [a * xi + yi for xi, yi in zip(x, y)]
x = np.arange(2**20, dtype=np.float32)
y = np.arange(2**20, dtype=np.float32)
with places.gpu0:
gpu_result = saxpy(2.0, x, y)
with places.openmp:
cpu_result = saxpy(2.0, x, y)
https://devblogs.nvidia.com/six-ways-saxpy/
Copperhead (Python)Copperhead (Python) FortranFortran

67
Main Dish
Optimizing Memory Transfers

68
Matrix Transpose Problem
10 n-1
// CPU code
void transpose_CPU(float in[], float
out[]{
for(int j=0; j < N; j++)
for(int i=0; i < N; i++)
// out(j,i) = in(i,j)
out[j + i*N] = in[i + j*N];
}
// Single Thread
__global__ void
transpose_serial(float in[], float out[])
{
for(int i=0; i < N; i++)
}
transpose_serial<<<1,1>>>(d_in, d_out);
N = 1024
https://devblogs.nvidia.com/efficient-matrix-transpose-cuda-cc/
1 Thread
2 Inner Loops
No parallelism

69
Some Parallelism
10 n-1
// 1 Thread per row
__global__ void
transpose_parallel_per_row(float in[], float out[])
{
int i = threadIdx.x;
// out(j,i) = in(i,j)
}
transpose_parallel_per_row<<<1,N>>>(d_in, d_out);
Why not :transpose_parallel_per_row<<<N,1>>>(d_in, d_out)??
1 Block
1024 Threads
1 Loop
Some Parallelism

70
First performance gains
10 n-1
Serial: 173.164 ns
per_row: 1.37914 ns
What is the
next optimization step ?

71
Going full parallel
__global__ void
transpose_parallel_per_element(float in[], float out[]) {
int i = blockIdx.x * K + threadIdx.x;
int j = blockIdx.y * K + threadIdx.y;
}
dim3 blocks(N/K,N/K);
dim3 threads(K,K);
transpose_parallel_per_element<<<blocks,threads>>>(d_in, d_out);
Warning: Maximum parallelism not always gives the best performance
32 X 32 Blocks
32 X 32 Threads/Block
Maximum parallelism
No Loops

72
Full parallel performance
Serial: 173.164 ns
per_row: 1.37914
ns
par_per_el: 0.090304 ms
Can we get more performance ?

73
Lemon juice the GPU
What is the
next optimization step ?
Can we get more performance ?

74
More Optimizations
●
Wait!
Time to Stop Optimizing and
Start Thinking
●
Did we get the performance we seek ?
●
Did we have the same hot-spot ?
NOT

75
Memory bandwidth
./deviceQuery
GPU Max Clock rate: 1683 MHz (1.68 GHz)
Memory Clock rate: 5505 Mhz
Memory Bus Width: 352-bit
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Memory Clock: 5.505 * 10-6 clocks
/sec
Memory bus: 352 bits = 44 bytes
Maximum bandwith 242.220 GB/sec
Memory Clock: 5.505 * 10-6 clocks
/sec
Memory bus: 352 bits = 44 bytes
Maximum bandwith 242.220 GB/sec
< 40%
Bad
40-60%
OK
60-75%
Good
> 75 %
Excellent!
N = 1024, time = 0.67 ms
1024 * 1024 * 4 * 2 / (0.67 * 10-3
) = 1.25 * 1010
= 12.5 GB/sec
N = 1024, time = 0.67 ms
1024 * 1024 * 4 * 2 / (0.67 * 10-3
) = 1.25 * 1010
= 12.5 GB/sec

76
Memory Coalescing
CPU: xx GB/sec
0.1%
Serial: xx GB/sec
1%
per_row: xx GB/sec
4.5%
per_elem: xx GB/sec
31%
https://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/cuda-c-best-practices-guide/index.html
GOOD!
GOOD!
BABA
D!D!

77
NVidia Visual Profiler
●
Demo

78
Tiling
●
Problem: coalesced reads, scattered writes
●
Goal: coalesced reads, coalesced writes
●
Solution:
Input Output
Shared memory
K=32

79
Tilling Code
const int N= 1024; // matrix size is NxN
const int K= 32; // tile size is KxK
__global__ void
transpose_parallel_per_element_tiled(float in[], float out[])
{
// (i,j) locations of the tile corners for input & output matrices:
int in_corner_i = blockIdx.x * K, in_corner_j = blockIdx.y * K;
int out_corner_i = blockIdx.y * K, out_corner_j = blockIdx.x * K;
int x = threadIdx.x, y = threadIdx.y;
__shared__ float tile[K][K];
// coalesced read from global mem, TRANSPOSED write into shared mem:
tile[y][x] = in[(in_corner_i + x) + (in_corner_j + y)*N];
__syncthreads();
// read from shared mem, coalesced write to global mem:
out[(out_corner_i + x) + (out_corner_j + y)*N] = tile[x][y];
}
dim3 blocks16x16(N/K,N/K); // blocks per grid
dim3 threads16x16(K,K); // threads per block
transpose_parallel_per_element_tiled<<<blocks,threads>>>(d_in, d_out);
// to be launched with one thread per element, in (tilesize)x(tilesize) threadblocks
// thread blocks read & write tiles, in coalesced fashion
// adjacent threads read adjacent input elements, write adjacent output elmts
Shared
synchonize

80
NVidia Visual Profiler
●
Demo

81
Little’s Law
Udacity: Into to Parallel Programming

83
Tilling Code
const int N= 1024;
const int K= 32;
__global__ void
transpose_parallel_per_element_tiled(float in[], float out[])
{
// (i,j) locations of the tile corners for input & output matrices:
int in_corner_i = blockIdx.x * K, in_corner_j = blockIdx.y * K;
int out_corner_i = blockIdx.y * K, out_corner_j = blockIdx.x * K;
int x = threadIdx.x, y = threadIdx.y;
__shared__ float tile[K][K];
// coalesced read from global mem, TRANSPOSED write into shared mem:
tile[y][x] = in[(in_corner_i + x) + (in_corner_j + y)*N];
__syncthreads();
// read from shared mem, coalesced write to global mem:
out[(out_corner_i + x) + (out_corner_j + y)*N] = tile[x][y];
}
dim3 blocks16x16(N/K,N/K); // blocks per grid
dim3 threads16x16(K,K); // threads per block
transpose_parallel_per_element_tiled<<<blocks,threads>>>(d_in, d_out);
Shared
synchonize
Increase number of blocks per streaming processor
Reduce number of threads
Total amount of shared memory per block: 49152 bytes
Total number of registers available per block: 65536
Maximum number of threads per multiprocessor: 2048
Maximum number of threads per block: 1024

85
Comparison Analysis
Serial Per Row Per Element Tiled 32 Tiled 16
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
Serial Per Row Per Element Tiled 32 Tiled 16

86
Memory Coalescing
in transpose_parallel_per_element
10 n-1
const int N= 1024; // matrix size is NxN
const int K= 32; // tile size is KxK
__global__ void
transpose_parallel_per_element(float in[], float out[])
{
int i = blockIdx.x * K + threadIdx.x;
int j = blockIdx.y * K + threadIdx.y;
}
32X32
BAD!
BAD!
N = 1024
N = 1024
Most GPU codes are bandwith limitedMost GPU codes are bandwith limited
copy
shared memory copy
naive transpose
coalesced transpose
conflict-free transpose
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
< 40%
Bad
40-60%
OK
60-75%
Good
> 75 %
Excellent!

87
Optimization Verdict
●
Never optimize in vacuum. Know when to stop
●
Use existing robust libraries
●
Measure & improve memory bandwidth
– Assure sufficient occupancy
– Coalesce global memory accesses
– Minimize latency between accesses
●
Minimize thread divergence
– Avoid branchy code
– Avoid thread workload imbalance
●
Use fast math intrinsics, and double precision
●
Split workload into streams
●
Learn Nvidia CUDA Visual Profiler (nvvp)
Udacity CS344: Intro to Parallel Programming

88
All of CUDA
●
CUDA atomic operations
●
CUDA streams
●
CUDA textures
●
CUDA Dynamic parallelism
●
Floating point calculations
●
Instincts
●
Important algorithms
map, reduce, scan, gather, scatter, stencil, histogram
●
Multi GPU programming
●
Multi GPU/CPU and OpenMP
NOT

89
For more Info
Cuda C Best Practices
Cuda Documentation
Heterogeneous Parallel Programming , University of Illinois, Co
Udacity CS344: Intro to Parallel Programming (NVidia)

Will your next
computer have a
graphics card ?
Why ?

A genie gives you
1,000 more
computing power.
How you gonna use
it?
If it gives you 100,000 more ?

92
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
CUDA Driver Version / Runtime Version 9.2 / 9.2
CUDA Capability Major/Minor version number: 6.1
Total amount of global memory: 11177 MBytes
(28) Multiprocessors, (128) CUDA Cores/MP: 3584 CUDA Cores
GPU Max Clock rate: 1683 MHz (1.68 GHz)
Memory Clock rate: 5505 Mhz
Memory Bus Width: 352-bit
L2 Cache Size: 2883584 bytes
Maximum Texture Dimension Size (x,y,z) 1D=(131072), 2D=(131072, 65536),
3D=(16384, 16384, 16384)
Maximum Layered 1D Texture Size, (num) layers 1D=(32768), 2048 layers
Maximum Layered 2D Texture Size, (num) layers 2D=(32768, 32768), 2048 layers
Total amount of constant memory: 65536 bytes
Total amount of shared memory per block: 49152 bytes
Total number of registers available per block: 65536
Warp size: 32
Maximum number of threads per multiprocessor: 2048
Maximum number of threads per block: 1024
Max dimension size of a thread block (x,y,z): (1024, 1024, 64)
Max dimension size of a grid size (x,y,z): (2147483647, 65535, 65535)
./deviceQuery

93
Thanks for your patience
Any
Questions ?
Any
Questions ?

GPGPU Computation

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to GPGPU Computation

Similar to GPGPU Computation (20)

More from jtsagata

More from jtsagata (17)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

GPGPU Computation