Information & Knowledge
      Management
Knowledge Management State of The Art

              Marielba Zacarias
             Prof. Auxiliar DEEI
         FCT I, Gab 2.69, Ext. 7749
              mzacaria@ualg.pt
         http://w3.ualg.pt/~mzacaria
Summary
Why invest in Knowledge Management
Knowledge and Leadership
Organizational Culture
Knowledge sharing between organizations
Knowledge sharing vulnerabilities
Knowledge Property
“Infoglut”
Tool section: Wikis
Basic assumption
We continuously challenge our knowledge
and how we apply it
When knowledge stops evolving,
transforms into opinions or dogmas
 Thomas Davenport and Larry Prusak
Knowledge Management Value
 Essential questions

    How to be competitive?

    How can we accelerate “time-to-market” cycles?

    How to maximize new products production rate?

    How to minimize production costs or re-working?

    How to eliminate inconsistencies that

       hinder customer satisfaction?

       represent organizational risks?
Intellectual Capital Value
 Difficult to measure
    skills, relationship with clients, motivation and support
    structures

 Skandia AFS insurance company made important progress
 in this matter

 Principle:

    It is better to be approximately right than precisely wrong

 Three types of human capital
Human Capital
                                      Edvinsson & Stewart
Intellectual
   Sum of employee knowledge
   Value = cost of recreating it
   Internal awareness
Client
   External awareness
   Value of relationship with clients
       brand loyalty, ability of understanding their needs and requirements
   Cost of getting new clients (6 vs 1 of maintaining clients)
Structural
   Value of the services, products and systems created by the human capital
Example
USA government “Lobbyist”
Need of improving employee productivity
  Researchers spent 20% of their time searching existing knowledge out of
  the organization

  Employees spent 5 years in achieving expertise in identifying and efficiently
  exploiting internal resources

  Solution: intranet technology accelerated search and problem research
  leaving more time to production and innovation tasks.
Knowledge and Leadership

  Essential element in adopting a
 knowledge management strategy
  Creation of a culture of trust and
  collaboration
Implications
Redefine the ways of measuring value
creation
Change the ways people approach work
Change organizational culture
This requires a POWERFUL chief
 CKO (Chief Knowledge Officer)
It also requires...
Knowledge Engineers
Knowledge Analysts
Knowledge Managers
Knowledge stewards
Knowledge Engineers
Tactical/procedural approach
Responsible for eliciting and converting
explicit knowledge in replicable instructions
and procedures in order to allow its
codification within applications
Problems:
  Temptation of exaggerating the function
  More coded -> more difficult to change
Knowledge Analyst
Fosters good practices
Responsible for the collection, organization and
dissemination of knowledge typically on demand
Human repositories of good practices
Problems:
  they leave, they go with them!

  may stay strapped to that position
Knowledge Managers
They supervise the process
Approach work well when distributed among
several individuals throughout the organization
Coordenam esforços dos engenheiros e analistas do
conhecimento
Useful in big organizations where the sharing
process risks fragmentation and isolation
Problems:
  Risk of appearing “feudal” territories
CKO
Hierarchical top-down approach
Global coordination of knowledge
management efforts
Leadership role
Problem:
 Create the function before creating a
 knowledge sharing culture
Knowledge Steward
Useful in distributed knowledge
management approaches
Minimal but continuous support of
knowledge management efforts
Provide expertise in using knowledge
management tools, practices and methods
The role of Culture
 “The greatest challenge is not in
convincing people of adopting new
ideas but in convincing them in
abandoning the old ones”
 John Maynard Keynes
Culture as an obstacle to
knowledge management
Has been referred as the main obstacle to
knowledge management efforts...
...when they are not appropriate for such
efforts, for example in
  change resistance, risk aversion, or
  individualistic environments
Universal challenges
Build a community of “knowledge sharers”
Knowledge ownership
 knowledge & information means power!
Incentive management
Knowledge Base
To be valuable must be used throughout
the organization
Creation and maintenance of sharing
communities...
...without them no attempt to propagate
knowledge will succeed
Example 1
At the USA “lobbyist”, while managers
constantly spoke about sharing knowledge
All their actions in meetings and memos
promoted inter-department rivalry
  Budgeting policy: everyone competed for the
  same dollars
Example 2
In an aerospatial company, they asked employees to
innovate more but...
.. they publicly discouraged such innovation
because...
New products were frequently rejected for not
going in the same direction of the enterprise mission
(that no one new)
Example 3
In pharmaceutical company with a strong
community spirit
  groups with common causes
    put drugs in market
  those groups were regarded as “family”
Together with a open climate created a group
dynamics that was used in creating knowledge
sharing communities
Globalization
Regional Cultures difficult knowledge
management efforts in transnational
companies...
But the problem will always be the
existence of an appropriate culture
Example 1
In a metallurgic company, english was
imposed as the official work language in all
countries
Knowledge sharing sites in countries with
different languages were not fed due to the
translation effort required
Example 2
Transnational Pharmaceutical where
 americans seen as “cowboys” who
 “shoot” (act) before thinking
 englishmen seen as“over-thinkers” who
 “sit” (reflect) on a subject months before
 doing anything
Example 2 (cont)
An organizational culture of
openness and trust, and an effective
group leadership that fostered frequent
social meetings between team
members of both countries created
a strong team notion, that allowed to
overcome the differences between the two
countries
Critical success factor
Ignore traditional organizational constructs
such as departments or business units or
regions and focus on common interest areas
Acknowledge the existence of formal or
informal groups sharing common interests
Support them through knowledge management
processes and tools
Inter-organizational
     environments
The interest in knowledge management and
internet has also triggered knowledge sharing
between organizations
So, today we can also find inter-organizational
knowledge sharing environments
A more intimate relationship with clients, suppliers
and other partners (including competitors!)
Vulnerabilities
When we build sharing networks where knowledge
providers and consumers do not know each other
Trust and responsibility are critical
Credibility is also critical
  Proper privacy and security mechanisms are
  essential
Liabilities are critical in inter-organizational
environments
Knowledge Property
If knowledge is inside human minds, can it be
managed?, when..
Management entails external control and
ownership
The goal should then be
  foster sharing and a collective knowledge
  base
  Cultivate rather than Managing
“Information politics”
 Monarchy
 Feudalism
 Federalism
 Technocratic Utopia
 Anarchy
“Infoglut”
Happens when the knowledge supplier does not know
well the requirements of knowledge consumers
Problems with
  Categorization
  Organization
  Struture
  Search
Technical solution: The semantic Web
Tool section
   Wikis
Wikis
Wiki = fast (hawaian)
Website
Creation and edition of inter-linked web
pages
Using
  wysiwyg
  html
PBWorks

Gic2011 aula05-ingles

  • 1.
    Information & Knowledge Management Knowledge Management State of The Art Marielba Zacarias Prof. Auxiliar DEEI FCT I, Gab 2.69, Ext. 7749 mzacaria@ualg.pt http://w3.ualg.pt/~mzacaria
  • 2.
    Summary Why invest inKnowledge Management Knowledge and Leadership Organizational Culture Knowledge sharing between organizations Knowledge sharing vulnerabilities Knowledge Property “Infoglut” Tool section: Wikis
  • 3.
    Basic assumption We continuouslychallenge our knowledge and how we apply it When knowledge stops evolving, transforms into opinions or dogmas Thomas Davenport and Larry Prusak
  • 4.
    Knowledge Management Value Essential questions How to be competitive? How can we accelerate “time-to-market” cycles? How to maximize new products production rate? How to minimize production costs or re-working? How to eliminate inconsistencies that hinder customer satisfaction? represent organizational risks?
  • 5.
    Intellectual Capital Value Difficult to measure skills, relationship with clients, motivation and support structures Skandia AFS insurance company made important progress in this matter Principle: It is better to be approximately right than precisely wrong Three types of human capital
  • 6.
    Human Capital Edvinsson & Stewart Intellectual Sum of employee knowledge Value = cost of recreating it Internal awareness Client External awareness Value of relationship with clients brand loyalty, ability of understanding their needs and requirements Cost of getting new clients (6 vs 1 of maintaining clients) Structural Value of the services, products and systems created by the human capital
  • 7.
    Example USA government “Lobbyist” Needof improving employee productivity Researchers spent 20% of their time searching existing knowledge out of the organization Employees spent 5 years in achieving expertise in identifying and efficiently exploiting internal resources Solution: intranet technology accelerated search and problem research leaving more time to production and innovation tasks.
  • 8.
    Knowledge and Leadership Essential element in adopting a knowledge management strategy Creation of a culture of trust and collaboration
  • 9.
    Implications Redefine the waysof measuring value creation Change the ways people approach work Change organizational culture This requires a POWERFUL chief CKO (Chief Knowledge Officer)
  • 10.
    It also requires... KnowledgeEngineers Knowledge Analysts Knowledge Managers Knowledge stewards
  • 11.
    Knowledge Engineers Tactical/procedural approach Responsiblefor eliciting and converting explicit knowledge in replicable instructions and procedures in order to allow its codification within applications Problems: Temptation of exaggerating the function More coded -> more difficult to change
  • 12.
    Knowledge Analyst Fosters goodpractices Responsible for the collection, organization and dissemination of knowledge typically on demand Human repositories of good practices Problems: they leave, they go with them! may stay strapped to that position
  • 13.
    Knowledge Managers They supervisethe process Approach work well when distributed among several individuals throughout the organization Coordenam esforços dos engenheiros e analistas do conhecimento Useful in big organizations where the sharing process risks fragmentation and isolation Problems: Risk of appearing “feudal” territories
  • 14.
    CKO Hierarchical top-down approach Globalcoordination of knowledge management efforts Leadership role Problem: Create the function before creating a knowledge sharing culture
  • 15.
    Knowledge Steward Useful indistributed knowledge management approaches Minimal but continuous support of knowledge management efforts Provide expertise in using knowledge management tools, practices and methods
  • 16.
    The role ofCulture “The greatest challenge is not in convincing people of adopting new ideas but in convincing them in abandoning the old ones” John Maynard Keynes
  • 17.
    Culture as anobstacle to knowledge management Has been referred as the main obstacle to knowledge management efforts... ...when they are not appropriate for such efforts, for example in change resistance, risk aversion, or individualistic environments
  • 18.
    Universal challenges Build acommunity of “knowledge sharers” Knowledge ownership knowledge & information means power! Incentive management
  • 19.
    Knowledge Base To bevaluable must be used throughout the organization Creation and maintenance of sharing communities... ...without them no attempt to propagate knowledge will succeed
  • 20.
    Example 1 At theUSA “lobbyist”, while managers constantly spoke about sharing knowledge All their actions in meetings and memos promoted inter-department rivalry Budgeting policy: everyone competed for the same dollars
  • 21.
    Example 2 In anaerospatial company, they asked employees to innovate more but... .. they publicly discouraged such innovation because... New products were frequently rejected for not going in the same direction of the enterprise mission (that no one new)
  • 22.
    Example 3 In pharmaceuticalcompany with a strong community spirit groups with common causes put drugs in market those groups were regarded as “family” Together with a open climate created a group dynamics that was used in creating knowledge sharing communities
  • 23.
    Globalization Regional Cultures difficultknowledge management efforts in transnational companies... But the problem will always be the existence of an appropriate culture
  • 24.
    Example 1 In ametallurgic company, english was imposed as the official work language in all countries Knowledge sharing sites in countries with different languages were not fed due to the translation effort required
  • 25.
    Example 2 Transnational Pharmaceuticalwhere americans seen as “cowboys” who “shoot” (act) before thinking englishmen seen as“over-thinkers” who “sit” (reflect) on a subject months before doing anything
  • 26.
    Example 2 (cont) Anorganizational culture of openness and trust, and an effective group leadership that fostered frequent social meetings between team members of both countries created a strong team notion, that allowed to overcome the differences between the two countries
  • 27.
    Critical success factor Ignoretraditional organizational constructs such as departments or business units or regions and focus on common interest areas Acknowledge the existence of formal or informal groups sharing common interests Support them through knowledge management processes and tools
  • 28.
    Inter-organizational environments The interest in knowledge management and internet has also triggered knowledge sharing between organizations So, today we can also find inter-organizational knowledge sharing environments A more intimate relationship with clients, suppliers and other partners (including competitors!)
  • 29.
    Vulnerabilities When we buildsharing networks where knowledge providers and consumers do not know each other Trust and responsibility are critical Credibility is also critical Proper privacy and security mechanisms are essential Liabilities are critical in inter-organizational environments
  • 30.
    Knowledge Property If knowledgeis inside human minds, can it be managed?, when.. Management entails external control and ownership The goal should then be foster sharing and a collective knowledge base Cultivate rather than Managing
  • 31.
    “Information politics” Monarchy Feudalism Federalism Technocratic Utopia Anarchy
  • 32.
    “Infoglut” Happens when theknowledge supplier does not know well the requirements of knowledge consumers Problems with Categorization Organization Struture Search Technical solution: The semantic Web
  • 33.
  • 34.
    Wikis Wiki = fast(hawaian) Website Creation and edition of inter-linked web pages Using wysiwyg html
  • 39.