Poster prepared by Hung Nguyen-Viet, Sinh Dang-Xuan, Tran Thi Tuyet Hanh, Pham Duc Phuc, Delia Grace, Fred Unger and Kohei Makita for the Safe Pork conference, Porto, Portugal, 7-10 September 2015.

1. Risk-based approach for food safety applied
to pork value chain in Vietnam
Introduction
• Food-borne disease is a major public health issue in
Vietnam and the contamination of popular foods can
occur along the entire food value chain.
• Risk-based approach contains tools for managing food
safety (e.g. risk assessment) , however in Vietnam it is
rarely used and the capacity for application is still limited.
• We assessed the health risks related to pork consumption
in the context of small scale pig value chains and pork
traded in informal markets.
Methods
We applied the quantitative risk assessment with biological
and chemical sampling and analyses, coupled with practice
along the pig value chain and pork consumption assessment
and modelling.
Hung Nguyen-Viet – Scientist Food Safety and Ecohealth
h.nguyen@cgiar.org ● ILRI Vietnam
17a Nguyen Khang, Trung Hoa, Cau Giay, Hanoi, Vietnam ● ilri.org
This document is licensed for use under a Creative Commons Attribution –Non commercial-Share Alike 3.0
Unported License September 2015
September 2015
Hung Nguyen-Viet1, Sinh Dang-Xuan2, Tran Thi Tuyet Hanh3, Pham Duc Phuc2, Delia Grace1, Fred Unger1,
Kohei Makita4
1 International Livestock Research Institute, Hanoi, Vietnam & Nairobi, Kenya; 2 Center for Public Health and Ecosystem Research,
Hanoi School of Public Health, Hanoi, Vietnam; 3 Environmental Health Department, Hanoi School of Public Health, Hanoi,
Vietnam; 4 Rakuno Gakuen University, Ebetsu, Hokkaido, Japan
Salmonella
(n=1,275)
ISO 6579:2002
Biological analysis
(All sample types)
Study locations and sampling
Market
Pig
slaughter-
houses
Smallholder
pig farms
Hung Yen and
Nghe An province
Small scale pig value chain
and related informal markets
- Pen floor swab
- Drinking water
- Waste water
- Mesenteric lymph node
- Rectal feces
- Carcass swabs
- Slaughterhouse floor swabs
- Cleaning / washing water
- Cutting board swab
- Cut pork
Chemical analysis
(Pork samples)
Heavy metals
(n=18, pooled)
AAS
E. coli
(n=1,256)
Plate count
Growth promoter
(n=18, pooled)
ELISA and LC-MS/MS
Antibiotic residue
(n=18, pooled)
ELISA and LC-MS/MS
Acknowledgement
The research is under PigRISK project (2012-2017) funded by Australian Center
for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) and the CGIAR Research
Program (CRP) on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health (A4NH), and
coordinated by the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI).
Lab analyses: microbial and chemical focus
• High values for E. coli presence indicates general poor
hygiene along the chain.
• High levels of Salmonella in the final pork at market and
presence of the banned chemicals (sulfonamid and
chloramphenicol) can induce potential health risks for the
consumers.
• These data will serve as inputs for more in-depth health risk
assessments related to pork consumption.
Key findings
Salmonella and E. coli contamination
Chemical contamination from pooled pork samples
31.5
33.4
36.0
44.75.3
2.9
3.3
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Pig farms Slaughterhouses Pork shops Cut pork
3.4
Salmonellacontaminationprevalence
E.colicontaminationload(LogCFU/cm2or/g)
Figure 1. Overall Salmonella contamination prevalence ( , left axis)
and E. coli average loads ( , right axis) along different points of the
chain at pig farms, slaughterhouses, pork shops, pork.
Chemical
No. positive or
detected/n (%)
Residue µ (min-max)
(µg/kg)
Lead 5/18 (28) 74.1 (70.14-78.7)
Cadmium, Arsenic 0/18 (0) -
β-agonist group 1/18 (5) 1.09a
Tetracycline group 0/18 (0) -
Flourquinolones group 0/18 (0) -
Sulfonamides group 9/18 (50) 155.5 (35.6-263.2)b
Chloramphenicol 3/18 (16.7) 0.54 (0.34-0.76)
Table 1. Prevalence and residue level of analysed chemical on pork
a Salbutamol, bSulfamethazine
Conclusion and next steps
Salmonella in pork from the markets was 11.4±23.9 MPN/g