Five Factors Affecting 
Language Learning 
Strategies 
By : Nursyafiqa A’in binti Abd Shukor 
(A151293)
The Factors Affecting LLS 
Mohammad Razimi, Abdolmehdi Riazi & 
Shahrzad Saif (2008) 
1) Level of language proficiency 
2) Motivation 
3) Learning style 
4) Gender
Wu Lin-Fang (2013) 
1) Motivation 
2) Family background 
3) Vocabulary learning strategies 
4) Language learning strategies 
Attapol Khamkhien (2010) 
1) Gender 
2) Motivation 
3) Experiences in studying a language
1) MOTIVATION 
Compared to less motivated learners, 
those who were substantially motivated, 
tended to adopt more learning strategies 
and used them more frequently (Rahimi, 
Riazi & Saif, 2008). 
Motivation is one of the most important 
factors which affect students’ language 
learning achievement (Wu, 2013). 
Integrative motivation is hypothesized to 
be a complex of attitudinal, goal directed
1) MOTIVATION 
The total number of learning strategies 
were associated with motivational level 
(Chang & Huang, 1999). 
Motivation and attitudes are the primary 
sources contributing to individual 
language learning (Gardner, 1985). 
Motivation can be the matter explaining 
why people decide to do something, how 
long they are willing to sustain the 
activity, and how hard they are going to 
pursue it (Dornyei, 2001).
2) GENDER 
Females have consistently been reported 
as using LLSs more frequently than males 
(Rahimi, Riazi & Saif, 2008). 
Female students used Compensation and 
Affective strategies more frequently than 
male ones (Khamkhien, 2010). 
Female participants reported using Social 
and Metacognitive strategies most and 
Memory strategies the least, while males 
favoured the use of Metacognitive and
2) GENDER 
Foreign language and second language 
studies using the SILL in various countries 
have found significantly more frequent 
strategies used by females (Wen & Wang, 
1996). 
Gender was one of the factors affecting 
the choices of language learning 
strategies. That is, females used Memory 
and Metacognitive strategies more 
frequently than males.
3) LEVEL OF LANGUAGE 
PROFICIENCY 
 A high level of proficiency has been associated 
with an increased use of both direct and indirect 
strategies (Rahimi, Riazi & Saif, 2008). 
 Cognitive and Metacognitive strategies show high 
correlations with high language proficiency levels 
(Ku, 1995; Peacock & Ho, 2003). 
 Study on the relationship between 
communication strategies and the proficiency 
level of L2 learners found that low-proficiency 
students employed more communication 
strategies than high-proficiency ones (Chen, 
1990).
3) LEVEL OF LANGUAGE 
PROFICIENCY 
 High proficiency learners mainly employed 
linguistic-based communication strategies (such 
as using synonyms) more frequently than low-proficiency 
learners, while the latter mainly made 
use of knowledge-based strategies (Chen, 1990). 
 Cognitive and Metacognitive strategies showed 
very high correlations with the proficiency level of 
the participants and were used by high-proficiency 
learners. Compensation strategies, 
however, were shown to be favoured by both 
high- and low-proficiency students, with low-proficiency 
students outperforming the high-proficiency 
ones in their use of such strategies.
4) LEARNING STYLE/ 
LANGUAGE LEARNING 
STRATEGIES 
 Studies in the learning style area point to the fact 
that an individual’s learning style preferences 
influence the type of LLSs they use (Ehrman & 
Oxford, 1990). 
 Learners who favour group study are shown to 
use social and interactive strategies, such as 
working with peers or requesting clarification 
(Rossi-Le, 1995). 
 Learning strategies are the basic tools for active, 
self-directed involvement needed for developing 
L2 communicative ability (O’Malley &
5) FAMILY BACKGROUND, 
SIBLINGS SIZE AND 
ACHIEVEMENT 
Family background is one of the important 
factors affecting foreign language 
proficiency (Wu, 2013). 
Men come from privileged families with 
large siblings size would suffer less 
educational loss than men from less 
privileged families with large siblings size 
(Blake, 1989). 
The educational aspirations among young
5) FAMILY BACKGROUND, 
SIBLINGS SIZE AND 
ACHIEVEMENT 
High socioeconomic status results not only 
in more intellectual ability and better 
performance in school, but that high 
status parents provide more 
encouragement and support for 
postsecondary education than do low 
status parents (Blake, 1989). 
Parents’ background will affect grades 
positively because higher-educated 
parents will place more emphasis on
Thank You

Five factors affecting language learning strategies

  • 1.
    Five Factors Affecting Language Learning Strategies By : Nursyafiqa A’in binti Abd Shukor (A151293)
  • 2.
    The Factors AffectingLLS Mohammad Razimi, Abdolmehdi Riazi & Shahrzad Saif (2008) 1) Level of language proficiency 2) Motivation 3) Learning style 4) Gender
  • 3.
    Wu Lin-Fang (2013) 1) Motivation 2) Family background 3) Vocabulary learning strategies 4) Language learning strategies Attapol Khamkhien (2010) 1) Gender 2) Motivation 3) Experiences in studying a language
  • 4.
    1) MOTIVATION Comparedto less motivated learners, those who were substantially motivated, tended to adopt more learning strategies and used them more frequently (Rahimi, Riazi & Saif, 2008). Motivation is one of the most important factors which affect students’ language learning achievement (Wu, 2013). Integrative motivation is hypothesized to be a complex of attitudinal, goal directed
  • 5.
    1) MOTIVATION Thetotal number of learning strategies were associated with motivational level (Chang & Huang, 1999). Motivation and attitudes are the primary sources contributing to individual language learning (Gardner, 1985). Motivation can be the matter explaining why people decide to do something, how long they are willing to sustain the activity, and how hard they are going to pursue it (Dornyei, 2001).
  • 6.
    2) GENDER Femaleshave consistently been reported as using LLSs more frequently than males (Rahimi, Riazi & Saif, 2008). Female students used Compensation and Affective strategies more frequently than male ones (Khamkhien, 2010). Female participants reported using Social and Metacognitive strategies most and Memory strategies the least, while males favoured the use of Metacognitive and
  • 7.
    2) GENDER Foreignlanguage and second language studies using the SILL in various countries have found significantly more frequent strategies used by females (Wen & Wang, 1996). Gender was one of the factors affecting the choices of language learning strategies. That is, females used Memory and Metacognitive strategies more frequently than males.
  • 8.
    3) LEVEL OFLANGUAGE PROFICIENCY  A high level of proficiency has been associated with an increased use of both direct and indirect strategies (Rahimi, Riazi & Saif, 2008).  Cognitive and Metacognitive strategies show high correlations with high language proficiency levels (Ku, 1995; Peacock & Ho, 2003).  Study on the relationship between communication strategies and the proficiency level of L2 learners found that low-proficiency students employed more communication strategies than high-proficiency ones (Chen, 1990).
  • 9.
    3) LEVEL OFLANGUAGE PROFICIENCY  High proficiency learners mainly employed linguistic-based communication strategies (such as using synonyms) more frequently than low-proficiency learners, while the latter mainly made use of knowledge-based strategies (Chen, 1990).  Cognitive and Metacognitive strategies showed very high correlations with the proficiency level of the participants and were used by high-proficiency learners. Compensation strategies, however, were shown to be favoured by both high- and low-proficiency students, with low-proficiency students outperforming the high-proficiency ones in their use of such strategies.
  • 10.
    4) LEARNING STYLE/ LANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGIES  Studies in the learning style area point to the fact that an individual’s learning style preferences influence the type of LLSs they use (Ehrman & Oxford, 1990).  Learners who favour group study are shown to use social and interactive strategies, such as working with peers or requesting clarification (Rossi-Le, 1995).  Learning strategies are the basic tools for active, self-directed involvement needed for developing L2 communicative ability (O’Malley &
  • 11.
    5) FAMILY BACKGROUND, SIBLINGS SIZE AND ACHIEVEMENT Family background is one of the important factors affecting foreign language proficiency (Wu, 2013). Men come from privileged families with large siblings size would suffer less educational loss than men from less privileged families with large siblings size (Blake, 1989). The educational aspirations among young
  • 12.
    5) FAMILY BACKGROUND, SIBLINGS SIZE AND ACHIEVEMENT High socioeconomic status results not only in more intellectual ability and better performance in school, but that high status parents provide more encouragement and support for postsecondary education than do low status parents (Blake, 1989). Parents’ background will affect grades positively because higher-educated parents will place more emphasis on
  • 13.