5 Factor Affecting Usage of LLS 
NURUL AKMAR BT MOHAMAD NOOR 
A150551
LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY 
A high level of proficiency has been associated with 
an increased use of both direct and indirect strategies 
( Chang, 1990; Green and Oxford, 1995; Park, 1997; 
Chen, 2002; among others.(Ku, 1995; Peacock and 
Ho, 2003), shows that cognitive and metacognitive 
have high correlations with high language proficiency 
levels.Study showed that there are significant 
correlations between strategy use and proficiency 
level by 1006 English for Academic Purpose students 
in eight different majors in Hong Kong (Peacock and 
Ho, 2003)
Chen (1990) found that low proficiency students 
employed more communication strategies that the 
high proficiency levels because high proficiency 
learners mainly employed linguistics-based 
communication strategies more frequently than low 
proficiency learners, while latter mainly made use of 
knowledge-based strategies.
MOTIVATION 
Oxford and Nykes (1989), found latter as the single 
most important factor influencing strategies use. 
McIntyre and Noels (1996) reported that compared 
with less motivated learners, those who were 
substantially motivated, tended to adopt more 
learning strategies and used them more 
frequently.Yang (1999) studied the relationship 
between self perceived motivation and their use of 
LLS and the results showed a positive correlation 
between the level of motivation and the use of LLS
MOTIVATION 
McLeod (2002), found out that the strategy use was 
not affected by participant’s particular motivational 
orientation, but, rather by motivational level.
LEARNING STYLES 
Individual learning styles preferences influence the 
types of LLS they use (Ehrman and Oxford ,1990; 
Rossi-Lee, 1995; among others)Extroverts show a 
strong preference for social strategies while introverts 
use more of metacognitive strategies (Ehrman and 
Oxford, 1995)Rossi-Lee, 1995) stated that social and 
interactive strategies was used more by learners who 
favored group learning.
GENDER 
Studies stated that female have consistently using 
LLS more frequently than males. (Politzer, 1983; 
Hashim and Salih, 1994; Sy, 1994; Wharton, 
2000)Trans (1998), study of Vietnamese immigrant 
show s that, males from age 19 to 92, in USA, made 
greater use of LLS to learn and improve their 
language skills.
EXPERIENCE IN STUDYING 
Ramirez (1986) showed that the years of language 
learning affected the use of nine (out of 50) strategies 
indicated in the inventory.Ok (2003), investigated the 
effect of school on LLS use but found no evidence 
that learners LLS use in all six categories during a 
certain school year. Third-year students had higher 
mean scores than first-year students in two strategy 
groups, namely, compensation and memory.
THANK YOU =)
THANK YOU =)

5 Factor Affecting the Usage of LLS

  • 1.
    5 Factor AffectingUsage of LLS NURUL AKMAR BT MOHAMAD NOOR A150551
  • 2.
    LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY A high level of proficiency has been associated with an increased use of both direct and indirect strategies ( Chang, 1990; Green and Oxford, 1995; Park, 1997; Chen, 2002; among others.(Ku, 1995; Peacock and Ho, 2003), shows that cognitive and metacognitive have high correlations with high language proficiency levels.Study showed that there are significant correlations between strategy use and proficiency level by 1006 English for Academic Purpose students in eight different majors in Hong Kong (Peacock and Ho, 2003)
  • 3.
    Chen (1990) foundthat low proficiency students employed more communication strategies that the high proficiency levels because high proficiency learners mainly employed linguistics-based communication strategies more frequently than low proficiency learners, while latter mainly made use of knowledge-based strategies.
  • 4.
    MOTIVATION Oxford andNykes (1989), found latter as the single most important factor influencing strategies use. McIntyre and Noels (1996) reported that compared with less motivated learners, those who were substantially motivated, tended to adopt more learning strategies and used them more frequently.Yang (1999) studied the relationship between self perceived motivation and their use of LLS and the results showed a positive correlation between the level of motivation and the use of LLS
  • 5.
    MOTIVATION McLeod (2002),found out that the strategy use was not affected by participant’s particular motivational orientation, but, rather by motivational level.
  • 6.
    LEARNING STYLES Individuallearning styles preferences influence the types of LLS they use (Ehrman and Oxford ,1990; Rossi-Lee, 1995; among others)Extroverts show a strong preference for social strategies while introverts use more of metacognitive strategies (Ehrman and Oxford, 1995)Rossi-Lee, 1995) stated that social and interactive strategies was used more by learners who favored group learning.
  • 7.
    GENDER Studies statedthat female have consistently using LLS more frequently than males. (Politzer, 1983; Hashim and Salih, 1994; Sy, 1994; Wharton, 2000)Trans (1998), study of Vietnamese immigrant show s that, males from age 19 to 92, in USA, made greater use of LLS to learn and improve their language skills.
  • 8.
    EXPERIENCE IN STUDYING Ramirez (1986) showed that the years of language learning affected the use of nine (out of 50) strategies indicated in the inventory.Ok (2003), investigated the effect of school on LLS use but found no evidence that learners LLS use in all six categories during a certain school year. Third-year students had higher mean scores than first-year students in two strategy groups, namely, compensation and memory.
  • 9.
  • 10.