SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Division of Cebu Province
DMEA REPORT 2016
Division Profile
1 • No. of Elementary Schools
2 • No. of Secondary Schools
3 • TOTAL
4 •No. of Districts
894
239
1,133
55
Division Profile
1 • No. of Districts
2 • No. of Teachers
3 • No. of Municipalities
4 •Congressional Districts
15,306
55
44
7
DMEA SCOPE
Total No. of LARDO per Grade Level
Total Number of Schools with LARDO in each Quadrant
(ELEMENTARY)
Total Number of Schools with LARDO in each Quadrant
(SECONDARY)
Number of Learners with Mastery Level in each Quadrant
(KINDERGARTEN)
Number of Learners with Mastery Level in each Quadrant
(GRADE 1-3 (READING, FILIPINO, MTB)
CONCERNS/ISSUES/GAPS/PROBLEMS (CIGPs)
Grade Level BOSY 2016-2017
Enrolment
No. of PARDOs/
SARDOs
Percentage of
PARDOs/
SARDOs
Kinder 32581 101 0.31
1 48205 343 0.71
2 49047 229 0.47
3 50383 260 0.52
4 50887 280 0.55
5 60809 298 0.49
6 48976 180 0.37
7 41064 107 0.26
8 37734 60 0.16
9 33064 76 0.23
10 29372 49 0.17
11 20667 0 0.00
12 0 0.00
Total Number of LARDOs per Grade Level
Percentage of LARDO per Grade Level
Series1
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.31
0.71
0.47
0.52 0.55
0.49
0.37
0.26
0.16
0.23
0.17
0.00 0.00
Percentage of LARDOs per Grade Level
Percentage of LARDO by Congressional
District - ELEMENTARY
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
FIRST
DISTRICT
SECOND
DISTRICT
THIRD
DISTRICT
FOURTH
DISTRICT
FIFTH
DISTRICT
SIXTH
DISTRICT
SEVENTH
DISTRICT
OVERALL
0.75
1.12
1.32
0.62
0.56 0.57
0.1
0.81
Percentage of LARDO by Congressional
District - SECONDARY
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
FIRST
DISTRICT
SECOND
DISTRICT
THIRD
DISTRICT
FOURTH
DISTRICT
FIFTH
DISTRICT
SIXTH
DISTRICT
SEVENTH
DISTRICT
OVERALL
1.8
2.22
1.1 1.14
0.58
1.95 2
1.57
Total Number of Schools with LARDO in
each Quadrant (ELEMENTARY)
with 0 LARDOs with 1-5 LARDOs
with 6-10 LARDOs
with 11 and above
LARDOs
599 143
89 63
ELEMENTARY-
894
1
• With O LARDOs
2
• With 1-5 LARDOs
3
• With 6-10 LARDOs
4
• With 11 & above
LARDOs
Total Number of Schools with LARDO in
each Quadrant (SECONDARY)
with 0 LARDOs with 1-5 LARDOs
with 6-10 LARDOs
with 11 and above
LARDOs
177 24
17 21
SECONDARY-
239
1
• With O LARDOs
2
• With 1-5 LARDOs
3
• With 6-10 LARDOs
4
• With 11 & above
LARDOs
Total Number of Teacher RESPONDENTS
Who conducted a meeting with Parents of LARDO
NONE with SOME
with MANY with ALL
2,140
(36.59%)
1,660
(28.39%)
666
(11.39%)
1,383
(26.65%)
Was conducting a meeting with parents effective?
YES NO
% 83.45 16.55
Peer Guidance Home Visits
13.76 % 34.19 % 52.05 %
Number of Learners with Mastery Level in Each
Quadrant
KINDERGARTEN
Enrolment Beginning Developing Consistent
32,581 8,145 12,707 11,729
25.00
39.00
36.00
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
45.00
Beginning Developing Consistent
Percentage of Learners (Mastery Level)-
KINDERGARTEN
Number of Learners with Mastery
Level in Each Quadrant
GRADE 1-3 (READING)
Grade
Level
Enrolment Poor Frustration Instructiona
l
Independen
t
1 48,205 17,900 14,821 10,085 5,400
2 49,047 7,463 14,852 20,352 6,380
3 50,383 5,105 16,741 22,005 6,531
ENGLISH
37.13
30.74
20.92
11.20
15.22
30.28
41.49
13.01
10.13
33.23
43.68
12.96
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
45.00
50.00
Poor Frustration Instructional Independent
Percentage of Learners with Mastery Level
READING-ENGLISH
GRADE 1 GRADE 2 GRADE 3
Number of Learners with Mastery Level in Each
Quadrant
GRADE 1-3 (READING)
Grade
Level
Enrolmen
t
Poor Frustration Instruction
al
Independe
nt
1 48,205 14,049 13,951 13,584 6,621
2 49,047 5,500 13,125 21,617 8,805
3 50,383 3,582 14,179 23,142 9,480
FILIPINO
29.14 28.94 28.18
13.74
11.21
26.76
44.07
17.95
7.11
28.14
45.93
18.82
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
45.00
50.00
Poor Frustration Instructional Independent
Percentage of Learners with Mastery Level
READING-FILIPINO
GRADE 1 GRADE 2 GRADE 3
Number of Learners with Mastery
Level in Each Quadrant
GRADE 1-3 (READING)
Grade
Level
Enrolmen
t
Poor Frustration Instruction
al
Independe
nt
1 48,205 10,678 15,804 14,197 7,526
2 49,047 5063 12,762 21,339 9,883
3 50,383 3,313 13,183 22,798 11,088
MTB
22.15
32.79
29.45
15.61
10.32
26.02
43.51
20.15
6.58
26.17
45.25
22.01
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
45.00
50.00
Poor Frustration Instructional Independent
Percentage of Learners with Mastery Level
READING-MTB
GRADE 1 GRADE 2 GRADE 3
Policies in K to 12
None 1-3 4-6 7-9 10
more
If NO what?
Home Visits More
meetings
Performance
contract
others
3159 733 212 155
Was Intervention conducted YES NO
7441 592
POLICY COMPLIANCE
ALWAYS MOST OF
THE TIME
SOMETIMES NONE
Drill/ Mastery 4069 5859 1135 39
Reward/Punishment 1925 3453 4933 465
Lecture 2685 5249 2692 183
Textbook 2097 4658 3763 293
Interactive 4257 5276 1241 9
Groupings 2459 5419 2975 38
Guided Discovery 2781 5313 2820 65
Manipulative 778 1792 6680 1491
Demonstration 4377 5118 1191 20
Constructivism 4159 5163 1465 35
Inquiry 2327 5059 3198 88
Reflective 3009 4913 2514 166
Journals 367 1106 5924 3124
Integration 3004 4692 2808 201
Policies in K to 12
None 1-3 4-6 7-9 10
more
Failures 4563 2752 1129 365 918
Student you’ve
meet
3836 3027 1136 393 715
Parents you’ve
meet
3080 3324 1150 418 635
Was the meeting effective? YES NO
7515 619
Policies in K to 12
None 1-3 4-6 7-9 10
more
If NO what?
Home Visits More
meetings
Performance
contract
others
3159 733 212 155
Was Intervention conducted YES NO
7441 592
CIGPs that Contribute to the School Performance
Areas of
Concern
Implementation
CIGP
TYPE OF CIGP Action taken/ to
be taken
Proposed
Resolution
structure Trigger person New/
recurring
LEARNERS LARDO’s Institutional PSDS, SH,
Teachers
recurring Mapping/
Data Mining,
identification
of schools/
teachers/
Learners
with CIGP
Home
visitation
ICT Integration
Remedial reading
Designated
DSS
Rewards
System
Capacitate
SH/Teachers
on :Varied
instructional
delivery,
conduct of
remediation
Failures Institutional PSDS, SH,
Teachers
recurring
Reading Mastery technical EPS, PSDS, SH,
Teachers
recurring
TEACHERS Instructional
Competence
technical SDS, ASDS,
PSDS, SH,
Teachers
recurring Conduct
orientation,
Induction,
Training and LAC
sessions
Intensify
Capacity
Building and
LAC Session
activitieds
Time on task technical PSDS, SH,
Teachers
recurring Intensify Time-on-
Task Policy
Constant
Monitoring
21st skills
Integration
technical PSDS, SH,
Teachers
new Conduct Training
Needs Analysis on
ICT Skills
Conduct
Capacity
Building
Training on
identified
CIGPs that Contribute to the School Performance
Areas of
Concern
Implementation
CIGP
TYPE OF CIGP Action taken/
to be taken
Proposed
Resolution
structure Trigger person New/
recurring
Sch. HEADS/
Managers
Time on Task Technical/
institution
al
SH, PSDS, recurring Observance of
the required
number of
observations
to be
conducted
monthly
Constant
technical
assistance
given to
School Heads
on
Instructional
supervision,
Resource
generation
and
mobilization,
SIP
preparation,
review and
revalidation,
Regular
Division
Executive
Conference in
3 batches
Report
Management
Technical SH, PSDS, EPS Recurring Capacity
building/
Training on
Report
Management,
Monitoring
and
evaluation,
Instructional
supervision
M and E Technical SH, PSDS, EPS Recurring
Instructional
Supervision
Technical SH, PSDS, EPS Recurring
Managerial
competence
Technical SH, PSDS, EPS Recurring
CIGPs that Contribute to the School Performance
Areas of
Concern
Implementation
CIGP
TYPE OF CIGP Action taken/
to be taken
Proposed
Resolution
structure Trigger
person
New/
recurring
IM/Learning
Materials
Adequacy/
availability
Institutional SH,
PSDS,EPS
recurring *In-house
production of
Grade 5 and
Grade 11
Learners’
materials and
Teachers’
guides
*hiring of
personnel
assigned to
manned in the
production of
the materials
*utilization of
the LRMDS
portal and
Division
website
*Intensify
production of
Learners’
materials and
Teachers’
guides for all
grade levels
*Maximize
the use of
LRMDS portal
and Division
website for
uploading and
downloading
of learners’
materials
*School-to-
School
Partnership(
318 recipient
schools)
Maximizing use Institutional SH,
PSDS,EPS
recurring
Institutional SH,
PSDS,EPS
recurring
CIGPs that Contribute to the School Performance
Areas of
Concern
Implementation
CIGP
TYPE OF CIGP Action
taken/ to be
taken
Proposed
Resolution
structure Trigger
person
New/
recurring
Learning
Facilities
Classroom Needs Institutional SH,
PSDS,EPS
recurring *Coordinate
with the
Physical
Facility In-
charge
*Tap
possible
partners
from Private
institutions
(eg. RAFI,
Basa
Pilipinas,
VECO, Rotary
Club,
AFLATOUN
Project-
Lamac
Coop.)
*Chinese
Chamber of
Commerce
• Intensify
Public-
Private
partnerships
• Allocation of
school
buildings
using SEF
Fund (35M)
• Allocation of
other
facilities
using LGU
SEF Fund
• Intensify
Adopt-a-
School
Program
• Giving of
Plaque of
Appreciation
to Donors
and partners
Blackboard Institutional SH,
PSDS,EPS
recurring
Physical
Facilities
CR adequacy Institutional SH,
PSDS,EPS
recurring
Water Institutional SH,
PSDS,EPS
recurring
Electricity Institutional SH,
PSDS,EPS
recurring
CIGPs that Contribute to the School Performance
Areas of
Concern
Implementation
CIGP
TYPE OF CIGP Action taken/
to be taken
Proposed
Resolution
structure Trigger
person
New/
recurring
Financial
Management
Resource
mobilization
Institutional,
technical
SH, PSDS,
Disbursing
Officer,
Acountant,
Bookkeeper,
Property
Custodian,
BAC
recurring
Training of
newly-hired
bookkeepers,
In-house
Training (COA)
PHILGEPS,
Developed
Scheme on
liquidation,
Assigned
bookkeepers
to check
liquidation
reports
*Intensify
capacity
building of
bookkeepers,
accountant,
budget officer
Resource
Generation
Liquidation of
Funds
Late SARO Institutional,
technical
FUNDS ALLOCATION
AND UTILIZATION
ALLOTMENT
RECEIVED
OBLIGATIONS
INCURRED
UNOBLIGATED
ALLOTMENT
PS (GAS &
OPERATION)
3,925,967,000.00 2,911,122,790.09 1,014,844,209.91
TOTAL PS 4,972,687,367.86 3,572,131,579.36 1,400,555,788.50
TOTAL MOOE 439,911,593.84 316,591,626.26 123,319,967.58
CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,000,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00
GRAND TOTAL 5,413,598,961.70 3,889,223,205.62 1,524,375,756.08
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
PS (GAS &
OPERATION)
TOTAL PS TOTAL
MOOE
CAPITAL
OUTLAY
GRAND
TOTAL
74.15 71.84 71.97
50.00
71.84
PERCENTAGE UTILIZATION OF FUNDS
final_updated-mea-presentation-tool-cebu-province-v-1.1.pptx

More Related Content

Similar to final_updated-mea-presentation-tool-cebu-province-v-1.1.pptx

LASD Survey Highlights 2015-16
LASD Survey Highlights 2015-16LASD Survey Highlights 2015-16
LASD Survey Highlights 2015-16
Anna Kjos
 
Oerc 3 27-2014 overall ppt final
Oerc 3 27-2014 overall ppt finalOerc 3 27-2014 overall ppt final
Oerc 3 27-2014 overall ppt final
Ohio Education Research Center
 
Principal's Presentation to Board on Norfolk High School
Principal's Presentation to Board on Norfolk High SchoolPrincipal's Presentation to Board on Norfolk High School
Principal's Presentation to Board on Norfolk High School
Dr. James Lake
 
priority areas 2022.pptx
priority areas 2022.pptxpriority areas 2022.pptx
priority areas 2022.pptx
junalynADajotoy
 
Accountability update
Accountability updateAccountability update
Accountability updateKeith Eades
 
Materials for Outcomes Workgroup March 31 2015
Materials for Outcomes Workgroup March 31 2015Materials for Outcomes Workgroup March 31 2015
Materials for Outcomes Workgroup March 31 2015
Geneva2020
 
Seizing the agenda | Being data-informed and measuring what we value
Seizing the agenda | Being data-informed and measuring what we valueSeizing the agenda | Being data-informed and measuring what we value
Seizing the agenda | Being data-informed and measuring what we value
Wholeeducation
 
Glenn Hills Middle Smart Teams Smart School Faculty Meeting
Glenn Hills Middle Smart Teams Smart School Faculty MeetingGlenn Hills Middle Smart Teams Smart School Faculty Meeting
Glenn Hills Middle Smart Teams Smart School Faculty MeetingTFulmer1980
 
MARK-LESTER-SUSI-1.pptx
MARK-LESTER-SUSI-1.pptxMARK-LESTER-SUSI-1.pptx
MARK-LESTER-SUSI-1.pptx
MarkLesterSusi1
 
School Wide Focus
School Wide FocusSchool Wide Focus
School Wide Focusguest10349b
 
Survey Results-UNC adjunct & non-tenured faculty
Survey Results-UNC adjunct & non-tenured facultySurvey Results-UNC adjunct & non-tenured faculty
Survey Results-UNC adjunct & non-tenured facultyMichael Weddington
 
LSC Online - Brief Intro
LSC Online - Brief IntroLSC Online - Brief Intro
LSC Online - Brief Intro
Barry Dahl
 
Design and Technology Association’s 3rd Annual Consultant Conference
Design and Technology Association’s 3rd Annual Consultant ConferenceDesign and Technology Association’s 3rd Annual Consultant Conference
Design and Technology Association’s 3rd Annual Consultant Conference
Ofsted
 
CrICET: Collective Impact
CrICET: Collective ImpactCrICET: Collective Impact
CrICET: Collective Impact
edcocp
 
ALS DASHBOARD CY 2017 Q-4
ALS DASHBOARD CY 2017 Q-4ALS DASHBOARD CY 2017 Q-4
ALS DASHBOARD CY 2017 Q-4
Vicente Antofina
 
Growing Up with Naviance
Growing Up with NavianceGrowing Up with Naviance
Growing Up with NavianceNaviance
 
1st-Quarter-SMEA-2019 (1).pptx
1st-Quarter-SMEA-2019 (1).pptx1st-Quarter-SMEA-2019 (1).pptx
1st-Quarter-SMEA-2019 (1).pptx
jonadhe mondeja
 
23-24-STEPS-Litpro-Pretest-Results-Presentation.pdf
23-24-STEPS-Litpro-Pretest-Results-Presentation.pdf23-24-STEPS-Litpro-Pretest-Results-Presentation.pdf
23-24-STEPS-Litpro-Pretest-Results-Presentation.pdf
stepskristinemonderi
 
21st century learning 6 12
21st century learning 6 1221st century learning 6 12
21st century learning 6 12mcpsruark
 
Mod 3 data packs
Mod 3 data packsMod 3 data packs
Mod 3 data packs
Nazia Goraya
 

Similar to final_updated-mea-presentation-tool-cebu-province-v-1.1.pptx (20)

LASD Survey Highlights 2015-16
LASD Survey Highlights 2015-16LASD Survey Highlights 2015-16
LASD Survey Highlights 2015-16
 
Oerc 3 27-2014 overall ppt final
Oerc 3 27-2014 overall ppt finalOerc 3 27-2014 overall ppt final
Oerc 3 27-2014 overall ppt final
 
Principal's Presentation to Board on Norfolk High School
Principal's Presentation to Board on Norfolk High SchoolPrincipal's Presentation to Board on Norfolk High School
Principal's Presentation to Board on Norfolk High School
 
priority areas 2022.pptx
priority areas 2022.pptxpriority areas 2022.pptx
priority areas 2022.pptx
 
Accountability update
Accountability updateAccountability update
Accountability update
 
Materials for Outcomes Workgroup March 31 2015
Materials for Outcomes Workgroup March 31 2015Materials for Outcomes Workgroup March 31 2015
Materials for Outcomes Workgroup March 31 2015
 
Seizing the agenda | Being data-informed and measuring what we value
Seizing the agenda | Being data-informed and measuring what we valueSeizing the agenda | Being data-informed and measuring what we value
Seizing the agenda | Being data-informed and measuring what we value
 
Glenn Hills Middle Smart Teams Smart School Faculty Meeting
Glenn Hills Middle Smart Teams Smart School Faculty MeetingGlenn Hills Middle Smart Teams Smart School Faculty Meeting
Glenn Hills Middle Smart Teams Smart School Faculty Meeting
 
MARK-LESTER-SUSI-1.pptx
MARK-LESTER-SUSI-1.pptxMARK-LESTER-SUSI-1.pptx
MARK-LESTER-SUSI-1.pptx
 
School Wide Focus
School Wide FocusSchool Wide Focus
School Wide Focus
 
Survey Results-UNC adjunct & non-tenured faculty
Survey Results-UNC adjunct & non-tenured facultySurvey Results-UNC adjunct & non-tenured faculty
Survey Results-UNC adjunct & non-tenured faculty
 
LSC Online - Brief Intro
LSC Online - Brief IntroLSC Online - Brief Intro
LSC Online - Brief Intro
 
Design and Technology Association’s 3rd Annual Consultant Conference
Design and Technology Association’s 3rd Annual Consultant ConferenceDesign and Technology Association’s 3rd Annual Consultant Conference
Design and Technology Association’s 3rd Annual Consultant Conference
 
CrICET: Collective Impact
CrICET: Collective ImpactCrICET: Collective Impact
CrICET: Collective Impact
 
ALS DASHBOARD CY 2017 Q-4
ALS DASHBOARD CY 2017 Q-4ALS DASHBOARD CY 2017 Q-4
ALS DASHBOARD CY 2017 Q-4
 
Growing Up with Naviance
Growing Up with NavianceGrowing Up with Naviance
Growing Up with Naviance
 
1st-Quarter-SMEA-2019 (1).pptx
1st-Quarter-SMEA-2019 (1).pptx1st-Quarter-SMEA-2019 (1).pptx
1st-Quarter-SMEA-2019 (1).pptx
 
23-24-STEPS-Litpro-Pretest-Results-Presentation.pdf
23-24-STEPS-Litpro-Pretest-Results-Presentation.pdf23-24-STEPS-Litpro-Pretest-Results-Presentation.pdf
23-24-STEPS-Litpro-Pretest-Results-Presentation.pdf
 
21st century learning 6 12
21st century learning 6 1221st century learning 6 12
21st century learning 6 12
 
Mod 3 data packs
Mod 3 data packsMod 3 data packs
Mod 3 data packs
 

More from runaylanan1

Taking a stand on different critical issues.pptx
Taking a stand on different critical issues.pptxTaking a stand on different critical issues.pptx
Taking a stand on different critical issues.pptx
runaylanan1
 
Persuasive Techniques: logos, pathos, ethos [Recovered].pptx
Persuasive Techniques: logos, pathos, ethos [Recovered].pptxPersuasive Techniques: logos, pathos, ethos [Recovered].pptx
Persuasive Techniques: logos, pathos, ethos [Recovered].pptx
runaylanan1
 
CATCH UP FRIDAY – Drop Everything and Read1.pptx
CATCH UP FRIDAY – Drop Everything and Read1.pptxCATCH UP FRIDAY – Drop Everything and Read1.pptx
CATCH UP FRIDAY – Drop Everything and Read1.pptx
runaylanan1
 
ENG 9 Q3W2.pptx
ENG 9 Q3W2.pptxENG 9 Q3W2.pptx
ENG 9 Q3W2.pptx
runaylanan1
 
E-SIM (YLANAN, R.).pptx
E-SIM (YLANAN, R.).pptxE-SIM (YLANAN, R.).pptx
E-SIM (YLANAN, R.).pptx
runaylanan1
 
7225564.ppt
7225564.ppt7225564.ppt
7225564.ppt
runaylanan1
 

More from runaylanan1 (6)

Taking a stand on different critical issues.pptx
Taking a stand on different critical issues.pptxTaking a stand on different critical issues.pptx
Taking a stand on different critical issues.pptx
 
Persuasive Techniques: logos, pathos, ethos [Recovered].pptx
Persuasive Techniques: logos, pathos, ethos [Recovered].pptxPersuasive Techniques: logos, pathos, ethos [Recovered].pptx
Persuasive Techniques: logos, pathos, ethos [Recovered].pptx
 
CATCH UP FRIDAY – Drop Everything and Read1.pptx
CATCH UP FRIDAY – Drop Everything and Read1.pptxCATCH UP FRIDAY – Drop Everything and Read1.pptx
CATCH UP FRIDAY – Drop Everything and Read1.pptx
 
ENG 9 Q3W2.pptx
ENG 9 Q3W2.pptxENG 9 Q3W2.pptx
ENG 9 Q3W2.pptx
 
E-SIM (YLANAN, R.).pptx
E-SIM (YLANAN, R.).pptxE-SIM (YLANAN, R.).pptx
E-SIM (YLANAN, R.).pptx
 
7225564.ppt
7225564.ppt7225564.ppt
7225564.ppt
 

Recently uploaded

Best Digital Marketing Institute In NOIDA
Best Digital Marketing Institute In NOIDABest Digital Marketing Institute In NOIDA
Best Digital Marketing Institute In NOIDA
deeptiverma2406
 
The Accursed House by Émile Gaboriau.pptx
The Accursed House by Émile Gaboriau.pptxThe Accursed House by Émile Gaboriau.pptx
The Accursed House by Émile Gaboriau.pptx
DhatriParmar
 
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free downloadThe French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
Vivekanand Anglo Vedic Academy
 
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
Celine George
 
Digital Artifact 2 - Investigating Pavilion Designs
Digital Artifact 2 - Investigating Pavilion DesignsDigital Artifact 2 - Investigating Pavilion Designs
Digital Artifact 2 - Investigating Pavilion Designs
chanes7
 
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th SemesterGuidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
Atul Kumar Singh
 
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
EugeneSaldivar
 
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
Levi Shapiro
 
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptxThe approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
Jisc
 
Marketing internship report file for MBA
Marketing internship report file for MBAMarketing internship report file for MBA
Marketing internship report file for MBA
gb193092
 
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxSynthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Pavel ( NSTU)
 
Chapter -12, Antibiotics (One Page Notes).pdf
Chapter -12, Antibiotics (One Page Notes).pdfChapter -12, Antibiotics (One Page Notes).pdf
Chapter -12, Antibiotics (One Page Notes).pdf
Kartik Tiwari
 
Model Attribute Check Company Auto Property
Model Attribute  Check Company Auto PropertyModel Attribute  Check Company Auto Property
Model Attribute Check Company Auto Property
Celine George
 
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with MechanismOverview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
DeeptiGupta154
 
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama UniversityNatural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
Akanksha trivedi rama nursing college kanpur.
 
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativeEmbracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
Peter Windle
 
Pride Month Slides 2024 David Douglas School District
Pride Month Slides 2024 David Douglas School DistrictPride Month Slides 2024 David Douglas School District
Pride Month Slides 2024 David Douglas School District
David Douglas School District
 
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...
Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
 
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
Sandy Millin
 
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
MysoreMuleSoftMeetup
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Best Digital Marketing Institute In NOIDA
Best Digital Marketing Institute In NOIDABest Digital Marketing Institute In NOIDA
Best Digital Marketing Institute In NOIDA
 
The Accursed House by Émile Gaboriau.pptx
The Accursed House by Émile Gaboriau.pptxThe Accursed House by Émile Gaboriau.pptx
The Accursed House by Émile Gaboriau.pptx
 
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free downloadThe French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
 
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
 
Digital Artifact 2 - Investigating Pavilion Designs
Digital Artifact 2 - Investigating Pavilion DesignsDigital Artifact 2 - Investigating Pavilion Designs
Digital Artifact 2 - Investigating Pavilion Designs
 
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th SemesterGuidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
 
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
 
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
 
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptxThe approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
 
Marketing internship report file for MBA
Marketing internship report file for MBAMarketing internship report file for MBA
Marketing internship report file for MBA
 
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxSynthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
 
Chapter -12, Antibiotics (One Page Notes).pdf
Chapter -12, Antibiotics (One Page Notes).pdfChapter -12, Antibiotics (One Page Notes).pdf
Chapter -12, Antibiotics (One Page Notes).pdf
 
Model Attribute Check Company Auto Property
Model Attribute  Check Company Auto PropertyModel Attribute  Check Company Auto Property
Model Attribute Check Company Auto Property
 
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with MechanismOverview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
 
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama UniversityNatural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
 
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativeEmbracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
 
Pride Month Slides 2024 David Douglas School District
Pride Month Slides 2024 David Douglas School DistrictPride Month Slides 2024 David Douglas School District
Pride Month Slides 2024 David Douglas School District
 
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...
 
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
 
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
 

final_updated-mea-presentation-tool-cebu-province-v-1.1.pptx

  • 1. Division of Cebu Province DMEA REPORT 2016
  • 2. Division Profile 1 • No. of Elementary Schools 2 • No. of Secondary Schools 3 • TOTAL 4 •No. of Districts 894 239 1,133 55
  • 3. Division Profile 1 • No. of Districts 2 • No. of Teachers 3 • No. of Municipalities 4 •Congressional Districts 15,306 55 44 7
  • 4. DMEA SCOPE Total No. of LARDO per Grade Level Total Number of Schools with LARDO in each Quadrant (ELEMENTARY) Total Number of Schools with LARDO in each Quadrant (SECONDARY) Number of Learners with Mastery Level in each Quadrant (KINDERGARTEN) Number of Learners with Mastery Level in each Quadrant (GRADE 1-3 (READING, FILIPINO, MTB) CONCERNS/ISSUES/GAPS/PROBLEMS (CIGPs)
  • 5. Grade Level BOSY 2016-2017 Enrolment No. of PARDOs/ SARDOs Percentage of PARDOs/ SARDOs Kinder 32581 101 0.31 1 48205 343 0.71 2 49047 229 0.47 3 50383 260 0.52 4 50887 280 0.55 5 60809 298 0.49 6 48976 180 0.37 7 41064 107 0.26 8 37734 60 0.16 9 33064 76 0.23 10 29372 49 0.17 11 20667 0 0.00 12 0 0.00 Total Number of LARDOs per Grade Level
  • 6. Percentage of LARDO per Grade Level Series1 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.31 0.71 0.47 0.52 0.55 0.49 0.37 0.26 0.16 0.23 0.17 0.00 0.00 Percentage of LARDOs per Grade Level
  • 7. Percentage of LARDO by Congressional District - ELEMENTARY 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 FIRST DISTRICT SECOND DISTRICT THIRD DISTRICT FOURTH DISTRICT FIFTH DISTRICT SIXTH DISTRICT SEVENTH DISTRICT OVERALL 0.75 1.12 1.32 0.62 0.56 0.57 0.1 0.81
  • 8. Percentage of LARDO by Congressional District - SECONDARY 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 FIRST DISTRICT SECOND DISTRICT THIRD DISTRICT FOURTH DISTRICT FIFTH DISTRICT SIXTH DISTRICT SEVENTH DISTRICT OVERALL 1.8 2.22 1.1 1.14 0.58 1.95 2 1.57
  • 9. Total Number of Schools with LARDO in each Quadrant (ELEMENTARY) with 0 LARDOs with 1-5 LARDOs with 6-10 LARDOs with 11 and above LARDOs 599 143 89 63 ELEMENTARY- 894 1 • With O LARDOs 2 • With 1-5 LARDOs 3 • With 6-10 LARDOs 4 • With 11 & above LARDOs
  • 10. Total Number of Schools with LARDO in each Quadrant (SECONDARY) with 0 LARDOs with 1-5 LARDOs with 6-10 LARDOs with 11 and above LARDOs 177 24 17 21 SECONDARY- 239 1 • With O LARDOs 2 • With 1-5 LARDOs 3 • With 6-10 LARDOs 4 • With 11 & above LARDOs
  • 11. Total Number of Teacher RESPONDENTS Who conducted a meeting with Parents of LARDO NONE with SOME with MANY with ALL 2,140 (36.59%) 1,660 (28.39%) 666 (11.39%) 1,383 (26.65%)
  • 12. Was conducting a meeting with parents effective? YES NO % 83.45 16.55 Peer Guidance Home Visits 13.76 % 34.19 % 52.05 %
  • 13. Number of Learners with Mastery Level in Each Quadrant KINDERGARTEN Enrolment Beginning Developing Consistent 32,581 8,145 12,707 11,729
  • 15. Number of Learners with Mastery Level in Each Quadrant GRADE 1-3 (READING) Grade Level Enrolment Poor Frustration Instructiona l Independen t 1 48,205 17,900 14,821 10,085 5,400 2 49,047 7,463 14,852 20,352 6,380 3 50,383 5,105 16,741 22,005 6,531 ENGLISH
  • 17. Number of Learners with Mastery Level in Each Quadrant GRADE 1-3 (READING) Grade Level Enrolmen t Poor Frustration Instruction al Independe nt 1 48,205 14,049 13,951 13,584 6,621 2 49,047 5,500 13,125 21,617 8,805 3 50,383 3,582 14,179 23,142 9,480 FILIPINO
  • 18. 29.14 28.94 28.18 13.74 11.21 26.76 44.07 17.95 7.11 28.14 45.93 18.82 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00 Poor Frustration Instructional Independent Percentage of Learners with Mastery Level READING-FILIPINO GRADE 1 GRADE 2 GRADE 3
  • 19. Number of Learners with Mastery Level in Each Quadrant GRADE 1-3 (READING) Grade Level Enrolmen t Poor Frustration Instruction al Independe nt 1 48,205 10,678 15,804 14,197 7,526 2 49,047 5063 12,762 21,339 9,883 3 50,383 3,313 13,183 22,798 11,088 MTB
  • 21. Policies in K to 12 None 1-3 4-6 7-9 10 more If NO what? Home Visits More meetings Performance contract others 3159 733 212 155 Was Intervention conducted YES NO 7441 592
  • 22. POLICY COMPLIANCE ALWAYS MOST OF THE TIME SOMETIMES NONE Drill/ Mastery 4069 5859 1135 39 Reward/Punishment 1925 3453 4933 465 Lecture 2685 5249 2692 183 Textbook 2097 4658 3763 293 Interactive 4257 5276 1241 9 Groupings 2459 5419 2975 38 Guided Discovery 2781 5313 2820 65 Manipulative 778 1792 6680 1491 Demonstration 4377 5118 1191 20 Constructivism 4159 5163 1465 35 Inquiry 2327 5059 3198 88 Reflective 3009 4913 2514 166 Journals 367 1106 5924 3124 Integration 3004 4692 2808 201
  • 23. Policies in K to 12 None 1-3 4-6 7-9 10 more Failures 4563 2752 1129 365 918 Student you’ve meet 3836 3027 1136 393 715 Parents you’ve meet 3080 3324 1150 418 635 Was the meeting effective? YES NO 7515 619
  • 24. Policies in K to 12 None 1-3 4-6 7-9 10 more If NO what? Home Visits More meetings Performance contract others 3159 733 212 155 Was Intervention conducted YES NO 7441 592
  • 25. CIGPs that Contribute to the School Performance Areas of Concern Implementation CIGP TYPE OF CIGP Action taken/ to be taken Proposed Resolution structure Trigger person New/ recurring LEARNERS LARDO’s Institutional PSDS, SH, Teachers recurring Mapping/ Data Mining, identification of schools/ teachers/ Learners with CIGP Home visitation ICT Integration Remedial reading Designated DSS Rewards System Capacitate SH/Teachers on :Varied instructional delivery, conduct of remediation Failures Institutional PSDS, SH, Teachers recurring Reading Mastery technical EPS, PSDS, SH, Teachers recurring TEACHERS Instructional Competence technical SDS, ASDS, PSDS, SH, Teachers recurring Conduct orientation, Induction, Training and LAC sessions Intensify Capacity Building and LAC Session activitieds Time on task technical PSDS, SH, Teachers recurring Intensify Time-on- Task Policy Constant Monitoring 21st skills Integration technical PSDS, SH, Teachers new Conduct Training Needs Analysis on ICT Skills Conduct Capacity Building Training on identified
  • 26. CIGPs that Contribute to the School Performance Areas of Concern Implementation CIGP TYPE OF CIGP Action taken/ to be taken Proposed Resolution structure Trigger person New/ recurring Sch. HEADS/ Managers Time on Task Technical/ institution al SH, PSDS, recurring Observance of the required number of observations to be conducted monthly Constant technical assistance given to School Heads on Instructional supervision, Resource generation and mobilization, SIP preparation, review and revalidation, Regular Division Executive Conference in 3 batches Report Management Technical SH, PSDS, EPS Recurring Capacity building/ Training on Report Management, Monitoring and evaluation, Instructional supervision M and E Technical SH, PSDS, EPS Recurring Instructional Supervision Technical SH, PSDS, EPS Recurring Managerial competence Technical SH, PSDS, EPS Recurring
  • 27. CIGPs that Contribute to the School Performance Areas of Concern Implementation CIGP TYPE OF CIGP Action taken/ to be taken Proposed Resolution structure Trigger person New/ recurring IM/Learning Materials Adequacy/ availability Institutional SH, PSDS,EPS recurring *In-house production of Grade 5 and Grade 11 Learners’ materials and Teachers’ guides *hiring of personnel assigned to manned in the production of the materials *utilization of the LRMDS portal and Division website *Intensify production of Learners’ materials and Teachers’ guides for all grade levels *Maximize the use of LRMDS portal and Division website for uploading and downloading of learners’ materials *School-to- School Partnership( 318 recipient schools) Maximizing use Institutional SH, PSDS,EPS recurring Institutional SH, PSDS,EPS recurring
  • 28. CIGPs that Contribute to the School Performance Areas of Concern Implementation CIGP TYPE OF CIGP Action taken/ to be taken Proposed Resolution structure Trigger person New/ recurring Learning Facilities Classroom Needs Institutional SH, PSDS,EPS recurring *Coordinate with the Physical Facility In- charge *Tap possible partners from Private institutions (eg. RAFI, Basa Pilipinas, VECO, Rotary Club, AFLATOUN Project- Lamac Coop.) *Chinese Chamber of Commerce • Intensify Public- Private partnerships • Allocation of school buildings using SEF Fund (35M) • Allocation of other facilities using LGU SEF Fund • Intensify Adopt-a- School Program • Giving of Plaque of Appreciation to Donors and partners Blackboard Institutional SH, PSDS,EPS recurring Physical Facilities CR adequacy Institutional SH, PSDS,EPS recurring Water Institutional SH, PSDS,EPS recurring Electricity Institutional SH, PSDS,EPS recurring
  • 29. CIGPs that Contribute to the School Performance Areas of Concern Implementation CIGP TYPE OF CIGP Action taken/ to be taken Proposed Resolution structure Trigger person New/ recurring Financial Management Resource mobilization Institutional, technical SH, PSDS, Disbursing Officer, Acountant, Bookkeeper, Property Custodian, BAC recurring Training of newly-hired bookkeepers, In-house Training (COA) PHILGEPS, Developed Scheme on liquidation, Assigned bookkeepers to check liquidation reports *Intensify capacity building of bookkeepers, accountant, budget officer Resource Generation Liquidation of Funds Late SARO Institutional, technical
  • 31. ALLOTMENT RECEIVED OBLIGATIONS INCURRED UNOBLIGATED ALLOTMENT PS (GAS & OPERATION) 3,925,967,000.00 2,911,122,790.09 1,014,844,209.91 TOTAL PS 4,972,687,367.86 3,572,131,579.36 1,400,555,788.50 TOTAL MOOE 439,911,593.84 316,591,626.26 123,319,967.58 CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,000,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 GRAND TOTAL 5,413,598,961.70 3,889,223,205.62 1,524,375,756.08
  • 32. 0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00 80.00 PS (GAS & OPERATION) TOTAL PS TOTAL MOOE CAPITAL OUTLAY GRAND TOTAL 74.15 71.84 71.97 50.00 71.84 PERCENTAGE UTILIZATION OF FUNDS