Presentation in GNOME Asia 2015 which focus in the topic of "In Memory Computing" with the tittle An Overview, Maximize the Ability of The GNU/LINUX Operating System using In Memory Computation for Academic, Business and Government. This paper are mainly focus in moving the root file system from storage device into memory (RAM) device, minimizing bottleneck and maximizing performance, benchmarking and a little snippet script how to do that.

1. An Overview, Maximize The Ability of
The GNU/Linux Operating System Using
"In Memory Computation"
for Academic, Business and Government
Anton Siswo Raharjo Ansori

2. A little of Myself
Member of KLAS
(Komunitas Linux Arek Suroboyo)
2008 - Now
Lecturer at Telkom University
March, 2015
Born : May, 11th 1987
Live in Bandung, Come from Pasuruan
Mobile Number : +6282233932728
Email : raharjo@telkomuniversity.ac.id
masgandhul@gmail.com

3. Who had done it
Using application which
whole processing is
in memory
Using General OS
More and More Company
Image from http://www.welltech.in.ua/images/Linux_Family.jpg

4. Who had done it

5. Who had done it

6. Who had done it

7. Who had done it

8. Example

9. Let's talk about
In Memory Computing
What is it?
Why we need it?
Where it can be applied?
Cost reduction and calculation
Computer Component
Network Topology with and Without HDD
How we build it
What next research
Technical Specs
Benchmarking
Live and Video Demo

10. What is In Memory Computing

11. What is In Memory Computing
Whole OS in Memory

12. What is In Memory Computing
All OS
Processes

13. What is In Memory Computing
Critical Process Only

14. What is In Memory Computing
Become Storage as HDD

15. What is In Memory Computing
Whole OS in Memory
All OS
Processes
Critical Process Only
Become Storage as HDD
OR

16. What is In Memory Computing
Put simply, in-memory computing primarily relies on
keeping data in a server's RAM as a means of
processing at faster speeds. In-memory computing
especially applies to processing problems that
require extensive access to data–analytics, reporting
or data warehousing, and big data applications.
-- IBM --

17. Put it Simply

18. Put it Simply
Whole OS in Memory

19. Put it Simply
Whole OS in Memory

20. Put it Simply
Intention?
Whole OS in Memory

21. Put it Simply
Get the maximum performance
with the minimum bottleneck
Intention?
Whole OS in Memory

22. CONS of In Memory Computing
(1)
At this moment:
●
Not yet implemented Data Sync between
“HOST” and “In Memory” computer
●
Temporary file system
– data loss at electricity failure –

23. CONS of In Memory Computing
(2)
●
Limited Disk at max memory capacity in
16GB for single Notebook
●
Mounting local disk manually

24. Why we need it
●
Better, faster, decision making. This includes
the ability to reduce cost, identify competitive
opportunities, grow revenue, become more
efficient and reduce risk.
-- IBM --
●
General and Specific Purposes
●
System for Realtime processing

25. Why we need it
Green Technology
Easier Maintenance
Less Electricity, Less temperature
Minimum Drive and OS Error

26. Areas which need the most
Bottleneck of Storage, Memory and Processor in :
– Computing
– Intensive tasks
– Databases

27. Where it can be applied
Academic

28. Where it can be applied
Business

29. Where it can be applied
Government

30. Where it can be applied
Software Developer

31. Where it can be applied
Academic
Business
Government Software Developer
Business

32. More specific purposes
●
In daily activity
●
In research for HPC areas
●
Lower cost and greener Labs
●
In Public computer at campus

33. More specific purposes
●
For business which need realtime
processing
●
For handling big data processing
●
Using in memory computing to minimize
hardware maintenance and cost
reduction

34. More specific purposes
●
Faster compiling
●
Testing system
●
Developing
●
Benchmarking

35. Common Computer Component

36. Common Computer Network
Topology with HDD
Computer Computer Computer Computer

37. Common Computer Network
Topology with HDD
Computer
switch
Computer Computer Computer

38. Common Computer Network
Topology with HDD
switch
Server Server Server

39. Common Computer Network
Topology with HDD
Computer
switch
Server
Computer Computer Computer
Server Server

40. Proposed Computer Network
Topology For Non Storage Drive

41. Computer Computer Computer Computer

42. Computer Computer Computer Computer
switch

43. Computer
Server For
Non-Storage Client
Computer Computer Computer
switch

44. Computer
switch
Server For
Non-Storage Client
Computer Computer Computer
switch

45. Computer
switch
Server For
Non-Storage Client
Computer Computer Computer
Server Web
Server
Datacenter
switch

46. What next is Benchmarking

47. Phoronix Benchmarking
Disk Suite
Processor Suite
Memory Suite

48. Benchmarking
MemoryHDD

49. Benchmarking
SQLite Fail
HDD
PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMMB/s, More Is Better
AIO-Stress v0.21
Random Write
disk-51
700 1400 2100 2800 3500
SE +/- 84.95
3076.56
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -laio
PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMSeconds, Less Is Better
SQLite v3.7.3
12,500 INSERTs
disk-51
300 600 900 1200 1500
SE +/- 51.27
1420.52
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ldl -lpthread
PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMMB/s, More Is Better
AIO-Stress v0.21
Test: Random Write
aio-stress-mem
1200 2400 3600 4800 6000
SE +/- 50.86
5450.16
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -laio
Memory

50. PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMFiles/s, More Is Better
FS-Mark v3.3
1000 Files, 1MB Size
disk-51
6 12 18 24 30
SE +/- 0.43
23.23
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
1. (CC) gcc options: -static
Benchmarking
MemoryHDD
PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMFiles/s, More Is Better
FS-Mark v3.3
Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size
fs-mark-mem
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
SE +/- 20.48
4871.33
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
1. (CC) gcc options: -static

51. PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMMB/s, More Is Better
Dbench v4.0
48 Clients
disk-51
20 40 60 80 100
SE +/- 1.15
82.23
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
1. (CC) gcc options: -lpopt -O2
PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMMB/s, More Is Better
Dbench v4.0
128 Clients
disk-51
20 40 60 80 100
SE +/- 1.27
97.14
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
1. (CC) gcc options: -lpopt -O2
PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMMB/s, More Is Better
Dbench v4.0
Client Count: 256
dbench-mem
1500 3000 4500 6000 7500
SE +/- 38.13
7176.82
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
1. (CC) gcc options: -lpopt -O2
PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMMB/s, More Is Better
Dbench v4.0
12 Clients
disk-51
11 22 33 44 55
SE +/- 0.13
48.62
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
1. (CC) gcc options: -lpopt -O2

52. PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMMB/s, More Is Better
IOzone v3.405
8GB Read Performance
disk-51
2000 4000 6000 8000 10000
SE +/- 88.67
8136.12
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMMB/s, More Is Better
IOzone v3.405
8GB Write Performance
disk-51
20 40 60 80 100
SE +/- 0.29
82.65
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMMB/s, More Is Better
IOzone v3.405
Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance
iozone-mem
2000 4000 6000 8000 10000
SE +/- 18.54
8598.22
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMMB/s, More Is Better
IOzone v3.405
Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance
iozone-mem
1100 2200 3300 4400 5500
SE +/- 44.10
5299.84
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
1. (CC) gcc options: -O3

53. PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMMB/s, More Is Better
Threaded I/O Tester v0.3.3
64MB Random Read - 32 Threads
disk-51
3000 6000 9000 12000 15000
SE +/- 86.29
15038.89
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMMB/s, More Is Better
Threaded I/O Tester v0.3.3
64MB Random Write - 32 Threads
disk-51
0.1215 0.243 0.3645 0.486 0.6075
SE +/- 0.00
0.54
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMMB/s, More Is Better
Threaded I/O Tester v0.3.3
Test: Random Read - Size Per Thread: 256MB - Thread Count: 32
thread-io-test-mem
3000 6000 9000 12000 15000
SE +/- 213.59
13907.61
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0

54. PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMMB/s, More Is Better
Compile Bench v0.6
Test: Initial Create
disk-51
70 140 210 280 350
SE +/- 7.65
303.04
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMMB/s, More Is Better
Compile Bench v0.6
Test: Read Compiled Tree
disk-51
200 400 600 800 1000
SE +/- 0.15
955.16
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMMB/s, More Is Better
Compile Bench v0.6
Test: Compile
disk-51
130 260 390 520 650
SE +/- 1.05
584.58
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
In Memory side - Failure

55. PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMSeconds, Less Is Better
Unpacking The Linux Kernel
linux-2.6.32.tar.bz2
disk-51
3 6 9 12 15
SE +/- 0.12
9.07
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMTPS, More Is Better
PostMark v1.51
Disk Transaction Performance
disk-51
1200 2400 3600 4800 6000
SE +/- 38.33
5396
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMSeconds, Less Is Better
Unpacking The Linux Kernel
linux-2.6.32.tar.bz2
unpack-kernel-mem
2 4 6 8 10
SE +/- 0.02
8.90
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMTPS, More Is Better
PostMark v1.51
Disk Transaction Performance
postmark-mem
2000 4000 6000 8000 10000
SE +/- 95.67
8429
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
1. (CC) gcc options: -O3

56. Benchmarking
HDD
PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMSeconds, Less Is Better
Gzip Compression
2GB File Compression
disk-51
3 6 9 12 15
SE +/- 0.64
13.57
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMRequests Per Second, More Is Better
Apache Benchmark v2.4.7
Static Web Page Serving
disk-51
8000 16000 24000 32000 40000
SE +/- 632.92
39242.25
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
1. (CC) gcc options: -shared -fPIC -O2 -pthread
PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMSeconds, Less Is Better
Gzip Compression
2GB File Compression
gzip-mem
3 6 9 12 15
SE +/- 0.01
12.95
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMRequests Per Second, More Is Better
Apache Benchmark v2.4.7
Static Web Page Serving
apache-mem
9000 18000 27000 36000 45000
SE +/- 66.56
41255.76
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
1. (CC) gcc options: -shared -fPIC -O2 -pthread

57. Benchmarking
Memory Suite in HDD
and
Memory Suite in Memory

58. PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMMB/s, More Is Better
RAMspeed SMP v3.5.0
Integer Add
mem-suite-test
3000 6000 9000 12000 15000
SE +/- 0.00
13818.12
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMMB/s, More Is Better
RAMspeed SMP v3.5.0
Integer Copy
mem-suite-test
3000 6000 9000 12000 15000
SE +/- 0.00
14320.51
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMMB/s, More Is Better
RAMspeed SMP v3.5.0
Integer Add
mem-suite-mem
3000 6000 9000 12000 15000
SE +/- 0.00
13813.87
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMMB/s, More Is Better
RAMspeed SMP v3.5.0
Integer Copy
mem-suite-mem
3000 6000 9000 12000 15000
SE +/- 0.00
14221.83
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0

59. PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMMB/s, More Is Better
RAMspeed SMP v3.5.0
Integer Scale
mem-suite-test
3000 6000 9000 12000 15000
SE +/- 0.00
14288.12
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMMB/s, More Is Better
RAMspeed SMP v3.5.0
Floating-Point Add
mem-suite-test
3000 6000 9000 12000 15000
SE +/- 0.00
15690.93
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMMB/s, More Is Better
RAMspeed SMP v3.5.0
Integer Scale
mem-suite-mem
3000 6000 9000 12000 15000
SE +/- 0.00
14202.47
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMMB/s, More Is Better
RAMspeed SMP v3.5.0
Floating-Point Add
mem-suite-mem
3000 6000 9000 12000 15000
SE +/- 0.00
15538.87
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0

60. PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMMB/s, More Is Better
Stream v2013-01-17
Add
mem-suite-test
3000 6000 9000 12000 15000
SE +/- 7.76
16334.69
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp
PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMMB/s, More Is Better
Stream v2013-01-17
Copy
mem-suite-test
3000 6000 9000 12000 15000
SE +/- 9.10
14579.18
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp
PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMMB/s, More Is Better
Stream v2013-01-17
Add
mem-suite-mem
3000 6000 9000 12000 15000
SE +/- 17.77
16215.08
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp
PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMMB/s, More Is Better
Stream v2013-01-17
Copy
mem-suite-mem
3000 6000 9000 12000 15000
SE +/- 11.72
14462.49
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp

61. PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMMB/s, More Is Better
Stream v2013-01-17
Scale
mem-suite-test
3000 6000 9000 12000 15000
SE +/- 6.20
14485.59
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp
PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMMB/s, More Is Better
CacheBench
Read Cache
mem-suite-test
600 1200 1800 2400 3000
SE +/- 3.99
2785.24
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
1. (CC) gcc options: -lrt
PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMMB/s, More Is Better
Stream v2013-01-17
Scale
mem-suite-mem
3000 6000 9000 12000 15000
SE +/- 13.77
14357.91
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp
PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMMB/s, More Is Better
CacheBench
Read Cache
mem-suite-mem
600 1200 1800 2400 3000
SE +/- 0.14
2791.91
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
1. (CC) gcc options: -lrt

62. PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMMB/s, More Is Better
CacheBench
Write Cache
mem-suite-test
3000 6000 9000 12000 15000
SE +/- 11.08
14896.86
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
1. (CC) gcc options: -lrt
PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMMB/s, More Is Better
CacheBench
Write Cache
mem-suite-mem
3000 6000 9000 12000 15000
SE +/- 7.20
14910.62
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
1. (CC) gcc options: -lrt

63. Benchmarking
MemoryHDD
mem-suite
RAMspeed SMP
RAMspeed SMP
RAMspeed SMP
RAMspeed SMP
Stream
Stream
Stream
CacheBench
CacheBench
mem-suite-test
13818.12
14320.51
14288.12
15690.93
16334.69
14579.18
14485.59
2785.24
14896.86
PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COM
mem-suite-mem
RAMspeed SMP
RAMspeed SMP
RAMspeed SMP
RAMspeed SMP
Stream
Stream
Stream
CacheBench
CacheBench
mem-suite-mem
13813.87
14221.83
14202.47
15538.87
16215.08
14462.49
14357.91
2791.91
14910.62
PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COM

64. Processor Benchmarking
Memory
HDD
PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMSeconds, Less Is Better
Smallpt v1.0
Global Illumination Renderer; 100 Samples
smalpt
20 40 60 80 100
SE +/- 1.15
104
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp
PHORONIX-TEST-SUITE.COMSeconds, Less Is Better
Smallpt v1.0
Global Illumination Renderer; 100 Samples
smalpt-mem
20 40 60 80 100
SE +/- 0.88
104
Phoronix Test Suite 5.6.0
1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp

65. How we build it
Linux In Memory Computing

66. How we build it
LOCK
Install

67. How we build it
LOCK
Load Linux to Memory at Start Up

68. How we build it
When Finish, Your Linux at Your RAM

69. How we build it
LOCK

70. Let's demo It
Building in GNU/Linux OS

72. Let's demo It
Transfer session at boot up cost up to 10 minutes for 5.3 GB

73. Let's demo It
Proof of “In Memory Computing”

74. We are Searching for Partnership
Research
Project
and
Collaboration

75. Tribute to:
●
KLAS (Komunitas Linux Arek Suroboyo) –
klas.or.id
●
Tel-U (Telkom University) –
telkomuniversity.ac.id
●
Free and Open Source Licence image
●
Gnome Asia Summit 2015
●
Everyone who cannot be written their name in
here

76. Sayonara....
Thank You....
Terima Kasih....
Question Answer
and
Improvement Sections