Feed is very vital part in the animal nutrition. The classification pertains to a clear cut stratification in terms of their nutrient content mainly depending upon the digestible crude protein content.
Feed is very vital part in the animal nutrition. The classification pertains to a clear cut stratification in terms of their nutrient content mainly depending upon the digestible crude protein content.
Protein quality determination in monogastric animals, we can determine which protein is better in case of monogastric animals, Sri Venkateswara veterinary university, Animal nutrition, Vishnu Vardhan Reddy
This slides contains information on precision feeding in dairy cattle and requirement of energy, protein, fat, minerals and vitamins of a dairy cattle during lactation. Precision feeding protects reproductive health and milk production while reducing the nutrient loss in manure.
Only 25-35% of the N in feed goes into milk, with the rest excreted in feces and urine.
Dairy diets often have 120-160% of the P and that the excess is excreted in the manure.
Cost of feed can be reduced.
Precision feeding helps to improve water quality
Improving the efficiency of use of feed N.
Reduce SARA condition.
Controlled-release urea in dairy cattle feed.
Straw treatment-Ammoniation.
Reducing Enteric Methane Losses from Ruminant Livestock.
Phase feeding in dairy cattle.
Feeding bypass fat in early lactation.
Use of chelated minerals in dairy animals.
Nutraceuticals in dairy animal precision feeding.
10. Use of area specific mineral mixture to precise dairy animal nutrition.
11. TMR in precision nutrition.
12. Manipulation of dietary CAD.
Five distinct feeding phases can be defined to attain optimum production, reproduction and health of dairy cows:
Early lactation—0 to 70 days (peak milk production) after calving (postpartum).
Peak DM intake—70 to 140 days (declining milk production) postpartum.
Mid and late lactation—140 to 305 days (declining milk production) postpartum.
Dry period—60 days before the next lactation.
Transition or close-up period—14 days before to parturition.
Feed top quality forage.
Make sure the diet contains adequate amounts of CP, DIP and UIP.
Increase grain intake at a constant rate after calving.
Consider adding fat (0.4-0.6 kg/cow/day) to diets.
Allow constant access to feed.
Minimize stress conditions.
Limit urea to 80-160g/day.
Buffers, such as Na bicarbonate alone or in combination with Mg oxide (rumen pH)
In Transition period
Increase grain feeding, so cows are consuming 4.5-6 kg grain/day at calving (1% of B.wt)
Increase protein in the ration to between 14 - 15 % of the ration DM
Limit fat in the ration to 0.1kg. High fat feeding will depress DM intake.
Maintain 2.5-4kg of long hay in the ration to stimulate rumination.
Feed a low-Ca ration (< 0.20%, reduce Ca intake to 14 to 18 g/d)
Also, feed a diet with a negative dietary electrolyte balance (-10 to -15meq/100 g DM) may alleviate milk fever problems
Niacin (to control ketosis) and/or anionic salts (to help prevent milk fever) should be included in the ration during this period.
Different methods to calculateEnergy requirement for maintenance, growth, pregnancy, and lactation in ruminants
Sri Venkateswara veterinary university, Animal nutrition, Vishnu Vardhan Reddy
Protein quality determination in monogastric animals, we can determine which protein is better in case of monogastric animals, Sri Venkateswara veterinary university, Animal nutrition, Vishnu Vardhan Reddy
This slides contains information on precision feeding in dairy cattle and requirement of energy, protein, fat, minerals and vitamins of a dairy cattle during lactation. Precision feeding protects reproductive health and milk production while reducing the nutrient loss in manure.
Only 25-35% of the N in feed goes into milk, with the rest excreted in feces and urine.
Dairy diets often have 120-160% of the P and that the excess is excreted in the manure.
Cost of feed can be reduced.
Precision feeding helps to improve water quality
Improving the efficiency of use of feed N.
Reduce SARA condition.
Controlled-release urea in dairy cattle feed.
Straw treatment-Ammoniation.
Reducing Enteric Methane Losses from Ruminant Livestock.
Phase feeding in dairy cattle.
Feeding bypass fat in early lactation.
Use of chelated minerals in dairy animals.
Nutraceuticals in dairy animal precision feeding.
10. Use of area specific mineral mixture to precise dairy animal nutrition.
11. TMR in precision nutrition.
12. Manipulation of dietary CAD.
Five distinct feeding phases can be defined to attain optimum production, reproduction and health of dairy cows:
Early lactation—0 to 70 days (peak milk production) after calving (postpartum).
Peak DM intake—70 to 140 days (declining milk production) postpartum.
Mid and late lactation—140 to 305 days (declining milk production) postpartum.
Dry period—60 days before the next lactation.
Transition or close-up period—14 days before to parturition.
Feed top quality forage.
Make sure the diet contains adequate amounts of CP, DIP and UIP.
Increase grain intake at a constant rate after calving.
Consider adding fat (0.4-0.6 kg/cow/day) to diets.
Allow constant access to feed.
Minimize stress conditions.
Limit urea to 80-160g/day.
Buffers, such as Na bicarbonate alone or in combination with Mg oxide (rumen pH)
In Transition period
Increase grain feeding, so cows are consuming 4.5-6 kg grain/day at calving (1% of B.wt)
Increase protein in the ration to between 14 - 15 % of the ration DM
Limit fat in the ration to 0.1kg. High fat feeding will depress DM intake.
Maintain 2.5-4kg of long hay in the ration to stimulate rumination.
Feed a low-Ca ration (< 0.20%, reduce Ca intake to 14 to 18 g/d)
Also, feed a diet with a negative dietary electrolyte balance (-10 to -15meq/100 g DM) may alleviate milk fever problems
Niacin (to control ketosis) and/or anionic salts (to help prevent milk fever) should be included in the ration during this period.
Different methods to calculateEnergy requirement for maintenance, growth, pregnancy, and lactation in ruminants
Sri Venkateswara veterinary university, Animal nutrition, Vishnu Vardhan Reddy
Title: Feeding standard (Comparative Type)
By Dr. Rahul Kumar Dangi
What is feeding standard
Feedings standards are the tables showing the quantities of nutrients to be fed to the various classes of livestock for different physiological functions like growth, maintenance, lactation, egg production and wool growth.
Feeding standards may be expressed in quantities of nutrients or in dietary proportions. The nutrient requirements are generally expressed separately for each function or an overall figure for the combined functions. In case of dairy animal, nutrient requirements are generally expressed for the separate body functions but in case of poultry and pigs combined requirements of maintenance and other body functions are given.
Objectives of Feeding Standards
To Guide Farmers to selecting properly balanced rations for their livestock.
To classify different physiological functions like growth , maintenance , lactation , egg production and wool growth.
Considering individual animal for preparation of FS due to their ability to digest and utilize feed.
Glossary of terms
Nutrient requirement: A nutrient requirement is the average amount required for a particular function,
Nutrient allowance: A nutrient allowance is greater than this by a safety margin designed primarily to allow for variations in the requirement between individual animals.
Albuminoid ratio: Albuminoid ratio is the ratio of digestible protein to digestible
carbohydrate used. The term was used in Wolff’s Feeding Standard.
Nutritive ratio : Nutritive ratio is the sum of the digestible carbohydrate, digestible
protein, and 2.25 × digestible fat, divided by digestible protein.
Nutritive ratio: (Digestible carbohydrate + Digestible ether extract X 2.4)
Digestible protein
Physiological Fuel Value (PFV) : Physiological Fuel Value is "available fuel values" of the feeds, which is obtained by multiplying gross energy of the nutrients by digestibility coefficient. Physiological Fuel Values are 4.0 kcal/g for carbohydrates, 9.0 kcal/g for fat and 4.0 kcal/g for protein.
Various units are used for feeding standards
The energy requirements of ruminants may be stated in terms of
Net energy (NE),
Metabolisable energy (ME),
Digestible energy (DE) or feed units
Protein requirements in terms of crude protein (CP),
Digestible crude protein (DCP)
Metabolisable protein (MP) etc.
COMPARATIVE TYPE FEEDING STANDARD
1. Hay standard
In 1810 German scientist Albert Thaer gave a concept of “hay equivalent” as measures of relative value based on determining the materials in feed extractable with water or other solvents.
He suggested that different feeds should be compared using meadow hay as a unit.
Thaer, in selecting hay, states: "As hay is more known and more used than any of the other kinds of fodder, I shall make that article the standard by which all the others may be compared."
He gave the
Validation of the dry matter intake formula of Spartan 3 Ration Evaluator / B...nacaa
Robb, G.W. * 1, VandeHaar, M.J. 2, Bucholtz, H.F.2, Michigan State University
1 Senior Extension Educator, Michigan State University, 12220 Fillmore St. Suite 122, West Olive, MI 494602 Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, 2265J Anthony Hall, E. Lansing, MI 48824
this presentation is in two sections, 1st one is about protein quality estimation and 2nd is about novel protein sources.
hope it would be helpful for u guys...
OSTA TRAINING-introduction [Autosaved].pptxDeguTolera
Poultry nutrition is an integral part of poultry production. It has changed drastically as a consequence of developments in the other disciplines of animal science and also because of changes in poultry husbandry practices.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
1. Dr. Pramod Kumar
Assistant Professor-cum-Junior Scientist
Department Of Livestock Farm Complex
Bihar Veterinary College
Patna-14
1
2. What is feeding standards?
Feeding standards are the statements of the amount of
nutrients required by animals.
Feeding standards may be expressed in quantities of
nutrients present in dietary proportions.
Feeding standards should be consider as guides and
flexible rules in computation of rations to individual
animals and groups of animals in farm.
2
3. Objectives of Feeding Standards
To Guide Farmers to selecting properly balanced
rations for their livestock.
To classify different physiological functions like
growth , maintenance , lactation , egg production and
wool growth.
Considering individual animal for preparation of FS
due to their ability to digest and utilize feed.
3
4. Name Protein Energy
NRC(USA) CP ,DCP TDN,DE,ME,NE
ARC(UK) DCP,AP DE,ME
USSR DCP TDN,OU
Scandinavia(Denmark,
Norway, Sweden)
DTP FU
German DCP SE
Japanese CP,DCP TDN ,DE
India DCP TDN,SE
Various Feeding Standards of World
Ap=Available Protein
OU=Oat Unit
FU=Feed Unit
SE=Starch Equivalent
DE=Digestible Energy
ME=Metabolizable Energy
NE=Net Energy
4
6. Old Days Feeding Standard
Thear’s Feeding
Standard
1810 Hay equivalent(meadow hay to
compare other feeds)
Magendie’ and his
coworkers
1836 Essentiality of food nitrogen
Grouven’s FS 1859 1st FS contain protein, carbohydrate
and fat
Wolff’s FS 1864 Based on Digestible Protein, fats and
carbohydrates
Not considering
maintenance and
production
requirements
Kuhan’s FS 1867 considering maintenance, production,
allowances for milk quantity
requirements
Scandanavian FS 1884 Similar to hay equivalent 1 pound of common
grain such as maize,
barley, wheat as 1unit
for comparing 6
7. Middle Days Feeding Standard
Wolff-Lehmann FS 1864 Digestive protein,
digestive fat and digestive
carbohydrate.
Haecker’ FS 1903-1914 FS not only with quantity of
milk also depends on quality
of milk.
Savage’ FS 1912 Requirements express in
terms of DCP and TDN.
Frap’s Fs Based on DM ,DCP and
Productive value.
Kellner’s FS 1907 Starch Equivalent, which is
based on Net energy and
digestible true protein.
Armsby ‘ FS 1917 Based on true potein and net
energy.(Net Energy System)
7
8. Present Day Feeding Standards
Morrison’ FS 1915 Based on DM,DCP and
TDN
National Research
council’s Standard
1943 Nutrient requirement of
live stocks
Agricultural Research
Council Standard
1965 Based on Starch
equivalent
Japanese Feeding
Standard
1975 Based on protein, energy,
mineral and vitamins
Indian Feeding
Standard(ICAR)
1998 Based on Mid Morrison's
value
8
9. Agricultural Research Council Standard
The agriculture research council of UK with its
technical committee on the nutrient requirement
published a bulletin of ration for livestock and poultry
nutrition in 1865-67.
In this standard starch equivalent has been taken as a
unit expressing energy requirements of cattle in place
of TDN/ME/NE.
Rumen degradable and undegradable protein system
proposed by ARC(1980).
9
10. National Research Council
In USA National Research council and US Department
of Agriculture(USDA) has been publishing the
nutrient requirements for all types of farm animals
since 1945.
The nutrient requirement is based on size of the
animal and unit of production to be achieved.
These standards are being followed for practical
feeding of the livestock in number of countries.
10
11. Indian Feeding Standard
On the basis of work carried out in india, Sen and Ray
published nutrient requirements for cattle and
buffaloes in 1964 and revised by Ray and Ranjan
in1978.
Nutrient requirements of Indian livestock and poultry
was ultimately published by ICAR in1985.
11
12. Morrison’s Feeding Standard
He published his own FS in 1915.
Its also called ‘Modified Wolff and Lehmann
standard’.
Morrison FS indicate the nutrition requirement of
an animals in range rather than in one figure.
It is based on DM,DCP and TDN.
Morrison include the allowances for Ca, P,
Carotene.
The average of Morrison’ FS have been accepted for
Indian livestock.
12
13. Armsby Feeding Standard
Armsby published FS based on true protein
and net energy values in 1917.
By used of respiration calorimeter he
determined the net energy.
Armsby standard is not as widely used as are
the standard based on digestible nutrient.
13