The feedback provided suggestions to improve the design and layout of the magazine cover and interior pages. For the cover, it was suggested to use multiple smaller images instead of one large image, and to adjust the font color for better readability. For interior pages, it was advised to provide more detailed instructions and content, use consistent formatting and font styles between pages for clarity, and add borders around all images for visual balance. The article content itself received positive feedback with no changes suggested.

1. Feedback
Cover Design: The way I have laid out the front cover is to have it in sections,
having the title, the main part of the photo and the smaller/brief information at
the bottom. Using the leading lines from the photo as organisation was
something said to improve the cover and is something which could be possible,
and could be effective if I were to change the covers layout, it would depend on
what would be in place of the pathway to make it all readable.
Photographs: Instead of having one big image as the front cover criticism said
that I could use smaller images to fill up the page instead of the one big one,
which could work with the idea behind the magazine, possibly having a small
preview of edits or camera equipment to add a bit more to the cover instead of
one big image being the main/only attraction to draw people to the magazine.
Text and Font: The text at the bottom of the cover page in big and in a nice font,
however the darkness from the photo seems to make it a bit harder to read than
I would like, so it is something I would change if I were to redo the magazine so
that there wouldn’t be any kind of problems when people go up to it.
Magazine Content: The content of the magazine is said to be very brief so with
this in mind I would add more to what I have, more information and more
photos in order to give people useful information they have paid for.
Double Page Spread Design: On the double page there is information on a simple
and easy way to add filters to an image in Photoshop to bring out some more of
the colour and potential from the photo, however in criticism it said that the
writing merges into each other and may not be clear what is mean for each step,
so I would space them out more to make it clear which step is first to last and
what information goes with it.
Photographs: On one of the pages I have framed the images to make them stand
out, however I didn’t do it on the other page, which is something I would change
if I remade the double page, filling the photo more with the boarders.
Text and Font: The different use of font on the two double pages changes, on the
first page it’s slanted and slightly more difficult to read also floating in a white
space, to change this I would make it the same font as the other page and put a
slight grey background to take it out of the white space. On the other page the
font changes to make it easier to read and allow people to see the steps for
Photoshop with easy instead of having difficulties reading it and work with
Photoshop at the same time. If I did remake the double page I would have it as
the same font and make it easier to read all over instead of having the font
change.
Article Content: As a full article no criticism was given, comments said it was
generic and appropriate so as a whole the magazine worked but some things
could be changed to take it to its full potential.