The document is a marking scheme for a Year 4 mathematics exam consisting of Paper 1 and Paper 2. It provides the answers to questions 1 through 40 for Paper 1 and a detailed marking scheme for multiple choice and structured questions for Paper 2, including the breakdown of sub-marks and full marks awarded for parts of questions. The marking scheme serves as a guide for examiners to use in a consistent manner when evaluating and scoring student responses.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and InclusionTechSoup
Let’s explore the intersection of technology and equity in the final session of our DEI series. Discover how AI tools, like ChatGPT, can be used to support and enhance your nonprofit's DEI initiatives. Participants will gain insights into practical AI applications and get tips for leveraging technology to advance their DEI goals.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold MethodCeline George
Odoo provides an option for creating a module by using a single line command. By using this command the user can make a whole structure of a module. It is very easy for a beginner to make a module. There is no need to make each file manually. This slide will show how to create a module using the scaffold method.
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
Thinking of getting a dog? Be aware that breeds like Pit Bulls, Rottweilers, and German Shepherds can be loyal and dangerous. Proper training and socialization are crucial to preventing aggressive behaviors. Ensure safety by understanding their needs and always supervising interactions. Stay safe, and enjoy your furry friends!
MATATAG CURRICULUM: ASSESSING THE READINESS OF ELEM. PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHERS I...NelTorrente
In this research, it concludes that while the readiness of teachers in Caloocan City to implement the MATATAG Curriculum is generally positive, targeted efforts in professional development, resource distribution, support networks, and comprehensive preparation can address the existing gaps and ensure successful curriculum implementation.
A Survey of Techniques for Maximizing LLM Performance.pptx
F4 Final Sbp 2006 Math Skema P 1 & P 2
1. ppr maths nbk
SEKTOR SEKOLAH BERASRAMA PENUH
BAHAGIAN SEKOLAH
KEMENTERIAN PELAJARAN MALAYSIA
PEPERIKSAAN AKHIR TAHUN
TINGKATAN 4, 2006
MARKING SCHEME
MATHEMATICS
PAPER 1 & PAPER 2
NOTE
This marking scheme serves as a guide only. Other method which are equivalent and
suitable may also be adapted and used in the awarding of marks.
Paper 1: 40 marks
x
Paper 2: × 60
100
Total Mark: P1 + P2
THANK YOU
This marking scheme consists of 7 printed pages
PEPERIKSAAN AKHIR TAHUN INGKATAN 4, SBP 2006
SKEMA JAWAPAN MATEMATIK KERTAS 1
2. ppr maths nbk
Q Answer Q Answer
1. B 21. D
2. B 22. D
3. C 23. D
4. A 24. A
5. A 25. B
6. C 26. C
7. A 27. B
8. A 28. D
9. A 29. D
10. B 30. C
11. C 31. D
12. C 32. C
13. D 33. C
14. A 34. C
15. B 35. A
16. C 36. C
17. D 37. B
18. C 38. B
19. D 39. A
20. C 40. A
3. ppr maths nbk
PEPERIKSAAN PERTENGAHAN TINGKATAN 4, SBP 2006
SKEMA JAWAPAN MATEMATIK KERTAS 2
Sub Full
Q Marking Scheme
mark mark
1 4p2 – 3p – 10 = 0 P1
(4p + 5)(p – 2) = 0 K1
5
p= − ,2 N1N1 4
4
2 p + 4q = 26 or equivalent K1
4p = 24 or equivalent K1
p=6 N1
q=5
N1 4
3 ∠PTQ or ∠QTP P2
9
tan ∠PTQ = K1
12
∠PTQ = 36 52’ or 36.9
0 0 N1 4
4 (a) –2 P1
(b) -2 = -2(4) + c K1
c=6 K1
y = – 2x + 6 N1
y-intecept = 6 P1 5
5 (a) 15 P1
or equivalent
50
(b) 1
× 50
5 K1
10 N1
(c) 10 + 10
60 K1
20
or equivalent N1 5
60
6 1 22
V= × × 8 × 12 × 15 K1
3 7
V = 480 N1
22 2
× 7 × h = 480 K1
7
240 4
h= or 3.12 N1
77
4. ppr maths nbk
Sub Full
Q Marking Scheme
mark mark
7 (a) 90 22 60 22
A1 = × × 14 × 14 and A2 = × ×7×7 K1K1
360 7 360 7
A1 – A2 K1
1
128 N1
3
(b) 90 22 180 22
P1 = × 2 × × 14 or P2 = ×2× ×7 K1
360 7 360 7
P1 + P2 + 14 K1
58 N1 7
8 (a) Statement. False statement P1P1
(b) 3 is not a factor of 15. False P1P1
(c) Some triangles have a right angle P1 5
P P1
9 (a) Q
R
(b) P P2
Q
R
3
10 (a) 110 P1
(b) 20 P2
(c) 40 P2 5
11 (a) (i) – 0.91 P1
(ii) –0.42 – 1 K1
–1.42 N1
(c) (i) 20 N1
(ii) 5
13 N2 6
12 (a) (i) x
y= −2 K1
2
N1
y-intercept = – 2
(ii) 2m = 8 – 4 K1
m=2 N1
(iii) 1
mPQ= mRS = P1
2
1 K1
y – 5 = (x – 4)
2
2y = x + 6 N1
5. ppr maths nbk
Sub Full
Q Marking Scheme
mark mark
12 (b) (i) y – 10 = 2(x – 4) or y = 2x – 8 + 10 K1
y = 2x + 2 N1
(ii) (0, –8) P1
(iii) 10 + 8 K1
4−0 N1
9
12
2
13 (a) (i) 10 P1
(ii) Identify ∠EPF P1
7
Tan ∠EPF = K1
10
0
34 59’ N1
(iii) ∠UQV P2
5 K1
(b) (i) Tan ∠PKM =
10
∠PKM = 26.60 or 26057’ N1
(ii) 10 tan 38o K1
h = 5 + 10 tan 38o K1K1
12.81 N1
14 (a) (i) (a) or P1
(b) or P1
(ii) 5∉ A ∪ B. N2
(iii) 3n 2 + 1, n = 2, 3, 4, 5, … K1N1
(b) (i) 3 P1
(ii) 11 P1
(iii) 13 P2
(iv) 9 K1N1
6. ppr maths nbk
Sub Full
Q Marking Scheme
mark mark
15 (a) Distance Midpoint Frequency
(km)
11 – 20 15.5 5
21 – 30 25.5 3
31 – 40 35.5 3
41 – 50 45.5 4
51 – 60 55.5 10
61 – 70 65.5 8
71 – 80 75.5 4
81 – 90 85.5 1
91 – 100 95.5 2
Column 1 – P1
Column 2 – P1
Column 3 – P2
(b) 81 N1
15.5(5) + 25.5(3) + 35.5(3) + 45.5(4) + 55.5(10) + 65.5(8) + 75.5(4) + 85.5(1) + 95.5(2)
(c)
40
2100
or K2
40
52.5
N1
(d) Refer to the graph given
9 plotted points P2
Joining points P1
A straight line from point (5.5, 0) to point (15.5, 5) and 12
(95.5, 1) and (105.5, 0) P1